PC 88-299a ur s'p7.9. . J, t~
~ °~~ a
t '~ ' . ~~ 4S~e4~ ~ ~ r
.~aRf~
~
. x~soz.vTZO~ rr rro.~~,~~~
l: R~SOLUTION OF' THE ANAHEIM CiTY PL]\NNING COMMISSLqN
TH.AT PF.TITION FOR VARJANCE N0. 3857 gG GRANTED
,.. WHEREAS, tt:a Ar.ahoim Ci~y Flanninq Commission dic~ receive a
vorified Peti,kion for Variance from La Pal.na Husiness Park, T2io Ko7.1 Compzny
""' and Koll BusitiQS~ Centers,
~- La Pa1md, A Cali.forni.a General Paxtnership, 2g~p E.
La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92ap6, o~~rner, and John Bishop-Fisch Sishop
Design, 22C Nei,rport Center Drive, {t22p, Newpcrt Beach, CA 92660, agent, of
certmin raal properL•y situated in thQ Cit; af Anaheim, County of Orange, Stato
oE California described as:
,, L~'.~ 1 OF TRACT N0, 11810, IN TFiE COUNTX' UF ORANGE,
;, STATE OF CALIFO~tNIA, AS SHpWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN
~;~• BOOK 533 YAGE5 31 AN~ 32 OF MTSCELL1atTE0US MApS, IN
THE Or`FICF OF THC COUNTY RECORDER GF SAID COUNTY.
~ PARCEL ~
"' NAI2CELS 1., 2, 3, F,, 6. 7. $ I~TD 9 I:TL'L:JSI~IE~ IN TFiE
CITY OF ANAHEIhf, ~OUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS ST30WI~I ON A MAp FILED IN BOOK 7.23,
PAC~S 46 AND 47 OF PAF.CEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF TFiE
COUNTY RECORDER 0~' SATD JRANGE I;QU~TTy,
WHEBEAS, tYae City Planning Commissian did iiald a public hearing
at thQ Civic ~Center in tl~e Ci~~y of. Anahe;m on October 29, 198$, a~ 1:30
;' netice of said public k~earing having been duly given as ro uiY p•m~,
,` accordance wlth the grovisions of rhe Anahe:~m Municfpal ~Qde d hapter 18a03,~
~ to h~ar ai:d consid~r evidanc~ for and agair~st said proposed variance and ~~
; iuv~st.igate and makc~ findings aiici recommendations in connecti.on therewith; attd
, ~~H~AS• said Commission, ~zft~r due inapectxon, invosr.igatiAn
an~ study made by it;self and xn its boY~alf, anc~ after due COriS1C14Y'A~.1pL1 of all
evidence and r~por'ts ofFerec3 at sai~ hearing, doos Find and dotarmint~ the
following facLs:
1. That the pet.itiori~r propose~ .raivers o~ the :~llowing to
conytrur_t a 27-square foot, double-~~;,~g freest~nding sfgn;
~~~-~Q~~145 _4~ 2 1- Min~ID,~m dis ar~
~---~~L@en frees~and.ina_Grg,~~a.
~~ ~ ~ reguired; ]~qs r•ee - proposed).
l. That tY~e ab~ve-mentioned waivor is nereby qranted on the basis
that thore ~Sre special circiimstance~ applicable to the property such as size,
shape, topography, lacation and surrounQing~ w}iich do not a 1
identicalxy xoned property in ehQ same vicinit Pp y t4 other
of khe Zoning Code deprives the property uf ~ privileqes ~njoyea Pay{cothor
propc~rtfos in t2ie identical zone ar~d classiPication in the vi.cinity.
0532r
-1-
PC 88-299
r~ t . ...,
. . ~ ~. .. .c~~i`,
. , . . .. ... ~"7r~•~.
~. .
ihr"`'~~~
3. xhat thore are exooptional or estraurdinary circtunstances ur
conditians applicable to the propertiy involved or ta the i.ntended use of ~he
property that da noc apply yenerally ko the Z~Y•operty or c~~~s of uae in the
same vieinity and zone.
4. That tl~.e requested variance is nocessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other propexty in the
~ame vicinity ~nd zone, and denzed to the property in question,
5. That th~ req~xested variar•~e will not be materimlly detirimental to
the public welfare oz• ixijurious to the pz•operty or ir.~provements in such
vieinity and zone in which the property is loc~cted.
6. That no one iridicat~d their presenc~~ at said public he3ririg in
opposation; and that no c~rrespendence ~vas received in opposition to subject
petition.
:~ CA'L,IFORNIA EtTVIRONMk~NTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: xhs PZanning
~: Birec~or or P,~.s authorized representative has determined that t2-.e proposed
` pro3ect fa11s within the definition a£ Categorical L'xemptions, Class 11, as
clefinQd in the State EIR Guide7.ines anfl is, therefore, c~tegorically oxempt
from the xequirement to pre~are an EIR.
NOW, THL•'REF012E, BE IT R~SOLVED that tkze Anaheim City Planning
Conunission does hereby nrant subject Petition for VariancP, upon the
follawing conditions which are hereby found t~ bg a ziecessary prerequisite to
tha pr~posed use of the subject proparty in ardQr to prca~erve the safety and
general welfa.re of tk~e Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
l. ThaL• the legal ownor at subject propor~y sh•~11 ir.revocabl~ offer to
dedicsto to the City o£ A.naheim a strip of lanc witiin the area extending
sixty (60) f~et nor~h from the Route 91 rir~ht-~f• .1 line.
2. Tkiat in the ovent a parcel map is not recorded cnmbining the eight (8)
F~xisr_ing lots, tha legal gzoperty owner stiall furnish i:he Zoning Division
witti a copy of a recorded covenant and agrQement in a form approve3 by
the City Attorney agreeing to hold subject propprty as one parcel.
3. That subject property shall b~ developed suY~stantially in accordance with
plans and sp~cifications on fi?a with the CiLy o£ Anaheim marked Exhibit
No. 1.
4. That prior ~o issuance of ~tie necessary permii: by the Buildinq Division,
or witYlin a period of one year from tlie date o~ Chis resaZutaon,
whichever occurr~ fir~-~, Condition Nas. 1 and 2, abave-mentioned, shall be
compliod wi-:h. Exr ::ions for ~urther ti.me to complete sazd cc~nditions
may be granted i accordance with Section 18.03.090 of tha AnaY~ef.m
Manicipal Code.
j~~~~
.~~
,~,,
~:;
-2-
PC 88-299
f: ~:~,,'; ~S
`;;:
'..in
; a.
+~
,,,,
_ . •:~r.i
~
~..
~!~
~
.~.~
. ~~ ( 4«I'i1~
{yt~
,: r:
_ ~, ~~~
~ ~~~~~,r:,;
.''
5. That prior ta final bv%?.:~ing and zoni~~~ ir.~spections, Condition No. 3,
nbove-menti.onecl, sha11 b~, complisd with.
~ G. That appraval o.t this ~pplication aonstitutes aF~proval oP the gropasad
1 request onlg to thQ extezit that i~ complic~s with the Anaheim t~unicipal
Zoning Code mnd any other applicable City regulations. Apprcval does n~t
' include any aetion ox findings as ta compliance ar approval of the
:;
f reque~t regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulatic~n or
requirement.
BE iT FURTHE~2 RESOLVE~D ti:~t the Anaheim City Plunning Commission
doas hereb~ find z.nd detormine that adoption of :.hi:i RQSOluti.on is expressly
~! predicated upon applicant's ccmplianc:e with each arid all of the conditions
~i horei.nabove set fcrth. Should any such conditions, er any part ~hereof, be
-b declared invalid or unenf:orce~~:te by the final judgment af any court of
'; competent jurisdiction, then ;.his Resolution, and any approva~s herein
;i ~ontained, shall be deemed n~i11 and void.
~ T.HF I'0&EGOING RESOLUTION is signed and ~.pproved b,y me khis 24th day
° of October, 1988.
!A
7
, ,; ,~ ' ~:~r
~ ~ !. j; /.::.~-t-'/ r r~'. ~!i'~~ ~-f! ~...-~~ .
T CHATRWOid1~P7,/\NAFIEIM CITY FLANNING COMMISSION
:?i ATTEST: '
~~ Q~ /~~J~ '
~ ~' -- ~~'-`~.~ G~_L ___.__ 'i
S~~ SECR~:TARYI, ANAHEZtyI ClTY PLANNING COMMI;iSI027
aTATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY l7F ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AN1tHEINx )
T, Edith L. Harris, Secretary og thc~ Anaheim City Planninc~ Commission, do
hereby certify that tho foregoing rQSO].utian wa:; passed and a~~ptect a~ a
meeti.ng of t'.7e Andheim City Planning Commission hQ1d on ~c~ober 2~, 1988, by
the followinrJ vot:e of ~che members thereof:
~~ AYE3: COMr4ISSIANERS: B6UAS, DOYDSTUN, CARUSILLO, HEREsS'r, '
r
°°~ D5C HURriFY, MGSSE ;;~,
'", NOES: CO':~IIrIlSStONERS: NOrTE
' ABSc~NT: CC~.'.rIMISSIONERS: F~.LDHAUS
k!
~1-.i
;r
IN V~I';N~S~ WHEREOr . I hav~ :zereunto set my hand this 24th 8ay ~f Oc~ober, ~ i}
1988. . `1
~,,~ ~ , t
-~--e~~~' .~ ,
;;, SECRET~AY, ANAHEIM CITY PLA.~iNING COMMISSION ~
~`'i ; ;
;;
~*; i
:~
M.i . .. ... .
", -3- PC 88•-299
~~ ~'
::~ ; j.
~~
+~~
.. ~.
~ ~~.:, .~. . . „,,
wdyt4'Y(7(,Y.:.~1e°~,'!..i``i ... - ....: ~ _. .. ... . . .. ~ . . . . . .. ,.._ ~. . ... _~~. ~ .. ... .. ... ....n ~
. ... . ~. . . .. . , ... ...w~