PC 88-305~
~.S_4.~.L%.~I ti t~,~.$.~~9~
~
A RGSOLUTION OF THE ANI~HGIM CLT'1 PL~ANNITTG COt~fIS5I0N
TF3AT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USF. PI;RMIT NQ. 3083 BE DENIED
rjt71~ t
~lt
..1~,
WNEREAS, the Anahoim City Pl~nning Co~tunis~lon did recei.vo ~
verified Petition £ar Coiiditional Usa Permit from Bsisrol Company, 865
Comstock Av~nue, 17-D, West Los Angeles, CA 90024, owner,fo~dcertiA n real
Butts, 2133 Victory Boulevard, Canoga Park, CA 91303, aqent~
~roperty situated in tl~Q City oF Anaheaim, County of Urange, State oE
Cal3fornia, de~cribed as:
B~GIN.dING AT A PUINT ON THE SOUTEI LINE OF SD.ID
SOUxHWEST QUAItTER, NORTIi 89 DEGR~ES 21' 20" EASx
600.8ti FEET FROM TH~; SOUTHWEST CORNER THEROF; THENCE
NORTH 0 DEGREES 38' 4U" WEST 479.5ti CEET TO THE
SOUTh"WESTERLY LINE OF THE 100.OQ-FOOT SOUTHErN
PACIFIC RAIL~ROAD RZGHT OF WAY CONVEYED TO W~ST~RN
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY' BY DEED kECORDEi~ JUNE 12, 187E IN
BOOK 94. PAGE 996 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; TiiENCE SOUTA 57 DEGREES 13' 30"
~;AST 861.89 FE~T ALONG SAID SOUTHWEST~RLY LINE TQ THE
EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHSVEST QUAR'PER; THENCE SOUTH 0
DEGREES 45' S5" ~A.~'iT ~k.86 FI'sG'P AT.ONG SAIU ~AS`I' i.INE
TO THE SOUTIi LINE OI' SAIII SECTIUN; TFiEr1CE SOUTH 89
DEGREES 21' 20" WEST 719.40 FEET TO TEiE POINT OF
$EG7N2~ING .
WHEREAS, tha City Pl~r.ni:-g C~nunission did hold a publi.c hearing
at the Civic Center in the City of T.naheim ~n OVe~bas re'uired by 1~Yoandmin
nnticR of said public hearir.g having been duly g' ~I
. accordance with the provisions of- r.2ie Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03~
to hear and considar. evidc~nce for and aga.irYSt sr.ir. proPosed c~nditi.onal use
permit and to investigate and makP findings and recommondations in connectiun
therewith; arid
WFiLRET.S, said Commis~ior~, after ciuQ iuspection, 3nvestiga~ion
an~i studl~ mado by itself ancl i.n its beh~slt, ann after due car~sider~tior o£ a~l
eviclencg and raports off~rea at said heering, does find ox~d de~ermine tlie
foll.owing facts:
l. 7'hat tchQ ~ropo~ad u~c is properly o~e for whir,h a
r.nnditlonal45u to witt i to pc~rrnithretail Salo~~3ntl co•njunction aui*h~an exfsting
1(3.61.Q50.1
wholesale husiness in L•ho Mt~ Zone.
0537r
-1-
PC 88-30~
~. i.
, .,.. .._.~`,~v,t~
1 ~~';;' • ,1
~
~
~ . ~d.,: i .r.,,a~. 1h51§3i~~,~~tr .
' ' ( ~~( 1t a~o1
`~r,:'t;, .
t~( fi
jfi
~ ,,; ,,.
,
2. That the proposed usr~ consisting of a 3000 square foot
shoo~room £or t:~e retail sale of luggttge :.s h~reby aenfed on the basis that
said rstai'1 sales do not przmar3ly serv~ and are not compa~ible wi~h
industria7. uses in the underlying industrial zone.
3. T.hat th~ propos~d use will adversely afEact the adjoininq
lan3 uses nnd tho qrowth and davelopmont of Lhe area in which ;t is proposod
to be locat~d.
4. Tliat the size and sh~pe of the site proposed for the use is
not adequate ~o aZlow thQ fu11 develapment of the pr~pused u~e zn a manner not
dc~trimental to ~he particular area nor to the peace, health, sa£ety and
general we~.fare o£ the Citizens of the City oE Anaheim.
S. That ttiQ granting of the Conditional Use Permit, will ba
detrimen~al to the peace, health, safety and general wel.ft~re of the Citzzens
of the City oE Anaheirt~.
G. That lhe traftic qenerated by the pr~~posed use will imposo
an undue burden upon thQ stroet~ and highways designed an:~ improved to carry
the traffic in the area.
~~
7. That no one indicated their prPSence at sa.id puhli~c hearing
in oppositionj and th~,t no correspondonce was received i:~ opposition t4 the
subject ~etition.
~ ~LTFORN~?~FttV7RONMc^,NTAL O~AL,~~X ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim
'; City Planning Commissi.on has roviewed th~ pro~osal to permit retail sales in
~' coi:junction with an Qxisting wholosale business in the ML (In3ustria].,
I' Lami~ed) Zone on an irregularly-shaped parael of 1an.d consisting of
approx?mately 3 acres, tiaving a frontagQ af approximatel.y 630 feet on the
north siae of Lt~ Palma Aver.ue, having a maxinum depth of approximately 420
fest, and being located appro~cimatr~ly 590 feet e~st of the cenL•erline of
Gilbert Street and further described as 2311 W. La Palma Avenue; and does
hereb,y apgrov~ the Negative nec:laration upon findinc~ that ii: has considared
the NQgative Declaration tagethor with any c~mments received durinq the
;; public review procoss ~nd £urrher fi.ndi:ig on the bas.is of tho initial study
„ ~nd any comments received Chal there is na substantial. evidence that the
, groject will have a significant eff~ct on the anviror~menk,
NOW, THEREFORE, BF TT FtESOLVED that L-he Anaheim Gity Planning
~~ Commission does hereby deny subje~ct Petition for Conditionttl Usa Permit on
the basia of the aforementioxied findings.
~
THE FOfiEGOING R£SQI.UTION is signed ancl approved by me this 29th
day of October, 1988.
,
/:i~i GJ.,.:,.•.i ,,. ~,!i ~,':.._. r _._.
_~.,c_ ( • ' _~-,,r..__.
CHAIRWOM~T~ ANAHEIM CIiY PLANbiTNG C01~4+lISS:[ON
, ~~
~~.~.
t '~~
~~h.~.y . , . . ,. . .
~ }„
_2_
~~
i
PC 88-3A5 ''''~
, .:;~
, ;c
M1'~t
~r ~5V
.~/ + yJ,`~(
~ ~.:'~.. ..,.. ~ Ai ~41 ~.~:l.l~~~Y1 {f1E
~~~
r . ^~
~
ATTEST: ~
,~ r ~ ~ ~''~ / , -
. ~--____ ~ ~
SECR~TAR ;~ ANAFIgIM CI ~X rL7~~z~G ~p~ S Ip~
STATE AF CALIE'pRNIA )
CvL'~~T° OI' ORANGE ) S~~
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
1, Eaith L. Harris~ Serretary of the Anaheim C:,ty Planning
Commission, do ~~eroby cQrti:Ey ~hat the for~gaing resolution was passed aud
adopted a*_ a meeting o~ the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on October
24~ ~~BB. by tlie Fo].lowing vote oF the membors *hereoE:
AX~S; COMMISSIONEKS: IIOL'AS, HOYDSTUN, CARUSILLO, EiEFtBST,
NOES~ M~sSE
COMMiSSIONERS: NONE
ABSEN'T: COMMIS~IOIVER5: FELDHAUS, MC BU'RNEY
TN WITNESS n]HERBOF, I hav~e hereuntq set rny hand this 2~1th day
of October, 1988.
~~ ` ~p
-----______~--~--v~~~ '~~-
SECRETAR3C, ANAggTM CITY pLANNING COMMISSION
-3-
PC 88-305
~ . .. .;~ ~ 4~,~:~a~i~
~,~r
,,
~ r~'•.,+r~ f „~
:{5
r~;~
;:;(!;
; ,i~.,
,_d~~
,~
,;;
,~
; ;i~'
'a~U
~:}a
'~R;
~ ;,a
•~
.'~
,s
~
, -. ,. .
~ - ;•, r .~
, , , . <~..~,'r.,