PC 88-322~,
I ~ a~z1 ~~~}E
~ . , .,~ ~, :~
,
,
RE L T~9 i~~,,~~ 88-32? ,
A REuOLUTION OF THE ANAFIEIM CITY PLANNING COMMTSS:[ON
MODIF'YING CQNnITIONAL USR PERMIT N0. 2~20
WHEREA5, on Saptember 3Q, 1985, th~ An~heim City Plannin~
Commission adopted Qes~,lution No. PC85-216 in connecti.~n with the granting of
Condxtional CI~e P~rmi.t No. ~720 to construct a 179-unit senior citizons'
~`' reL•iremeni; facility and 99-bed skilled nursiiaa £acility with wafver of
required lot frontage on approximately 75 acres located Un the nurth side of
Modi.cal Center Drivcs, appruximately 585 feeti we:~t of the centerline of Euc].id
Srreet; an8
WHEREAS, the petit'.onor }i~c~ reguasted additional waivors of the
Eol7owing to complete construc~ion of the f.acility: (A) Mi~imum r~umber of
parking s~,aces f.or Parcel ~io. 1(the Senior Citizens Retirement E'acility) and
;i (B) Required height and type of fence for 1~arcel Nos. 1 and 2(the Senior
Citizens Retiremont F~cility and tkie Skilled NurSing F'acility).
WHEREAS, the petitloner request5 modificatiun of the fo].lowiny
conclir.ion~ of Resolution No. PC 85-216: No. 7 of Part 1(th~ Senior Ci4:izens
, Retirement Facility) and No. 6 af Part 2~the Skilled Nursing FaciliLy)
pertaining to foncing along the wQSterly, northerl~ and easr.erly property
lines; and No. 8 of Part 1(the Senicr Citizens Retirement Eacility) anQ No. 7
of Part 2(tho Skilled Nurs9.ng Facility) perta.ininc~ to recipr4ca3 Uarking
ayreements.
WHEREAS, Cb.o City Plannxng Commission did hold a public hearinq at
~he Civic Cc~n~er in the City of Anahoim on November 21, 1988, at 1:30 ~.m.,
notice of said pub]ic hearinq having bean cluly given as requirecl by law and in
~sccordance with the provisions of thQ Anaheim Municipal Cude, Chaptor 18.03,
t•o hear ar.d consider evidence fax~ and aqainst said proposQd amendment a~id Co
inv~stigatQ and make findings and recommen~'at-l~ns in conxiection therewitht and
V-H~REAS, said Co-nmission, after du~ inspection, investigation and
study ~nadQ by itse7.f and in its beht~lf, and after due consideration oT: all
evidence and reports o.Ef.ered at aaid hearing, ~loes L•ind and determine tl~e
followinq Pacts:
1. That the pe~itioner propases acidirional waivers o:E' the followfrg
to c~mplete consc:ruction ~f a previous.ly approved '179-un.it s~nior ci~:izens
retirement tacilzty anZ 9g-bed skilled nursing Eaci2ity:
f A) ~E~~~4~~~~4.~ ~.2~4~~ - Mi'Li.2L 'L~! ~!L?n_~~_4f_.P3s~~??~d_~P.~gs ~or
.~$.~St:..4.~4 Ps?r_c.c~l I~,~ 1• (~~ spacos required:
~.~.~,~a•_4SL4~54 .~.4. spaces prupoaA~l)
';:
(1~ ) ~~?'.~ 4N.~ ~.$.~~~4~~7 ~ - ~ ~~~~?~ ' ~ nS~XP.~Qf _~~~9.~2 r
~ri~ 1$~9sA2~~. P~~~~~~_ ~ ~~t~i.
.L.~ fuot ~_y~:3...~~4~~~-sZ~~ required alnng
residential zone boundariea;
~.€4.4~._.}-}.ig~M~.~~L..p.~~. ax.isting alonq westerly
RS-A-43,000 Zone boun~ary) ~S I~a r~r_¢~Q~7
03U~b
PC 88-322
~
~
• o
~
~
2. Tha~ the requesteci w~aiv~r (A) is hereby gra:~ted on the basfs that
the p~rking waiver will no~ cc~use an increaso in tr~ff3c cnngegt3on in the
immeQiate vicinity nor ~dversoly a£foct any adjoininq land uses and grauting
oE the parking waiver under. the cond3tions imposed, if, any, wi11 no~ bo
detrimeiitttl to the peace, hsa1L•h, safety and generil welfare of t2ie citizens
of ~he C:lty of ~nakieim.
3. That the re~uested waiv~r (B) is horeby grai:tod on thg bas.is that
thare are spQCia1 circumstances applicable to 'the property such a~s s3ae,
shape, togography, Socation and ~urrou~ndings whick~ do not apply to other.
identically zoned p.roperty in the sama vicinii:v; and that strict application
of the Zoning CoQo deprivos the prop~:rty o£ grivilages enjoyed by othar
properties in the identical zone and classiEication in kh~- vicinity.
~~ ~LT~QRNIA ~,NVIRQNMENTAL Q~ALITY ACT FT.ND,~: 'rhat the Negative
Doclara~ion graviously approvad in connQCtion with said aoiidxtional use permit
~ is adequate to sorve as enviromQnt.al documc~ntati.on i:~ connect3on wlth the
. requested modi.fications.
' NOW, THER~E'ORE, BF. IT FESOLVED that tho Anareim City Planning
` Cnmmission d~es heroby grant the request~d moclification to ResoYut3.on No.
~' PC85-2I6 adopted in connection with Conditional LJsc~ Permit No. 2720, amending
~
' the aforemenl:ioned ~onditions in their entirety, to read as follows:
"Par~, 1-- ni r Citaz~}r s Re~ir~r ~r t Fa~:ilitv:
7. 'Phat a six (6)-fnot high block wa11 s2ia11 be constructed and
. permanently maintained adjacent to the northexly~ and easterly
property linc~s, and that 2. minimum six (6) 9R five (5) L•oot hiqh
blo~k or metal wa11 aha12 be p~rRanently maS.ntaiii~d adjacent to the
westex•ly Nro~,erty line.
8. Tha~ ir~ the svent a pacel map i:
reciprocal accosa agroement, in
Attarney, shall be recorded with
Rec.order. A r,apy of the r.ecor.d~d
to the Planning Department.
~X~ 2 - Ski1le~NUrsing._F~i~il}ty:
recorded on subject proper.•ty, a
~ form satisfactory to the Cfty
~he~ Office of tlie Orange Cnunty
~greement shall then be subrnitted
6. That a six (6)-:Eoo~ high b~ock wall snall be cons~ructed and
permanently maintaxned adjacent to thc~ ensterly property lir.e,
ex~epting the r~quirc~d frant setback area which shall be three (3)
~eet iri height, ~nd that rs miaimwn six ( ti)-foot htgk~ block or metal
c~al], shall be p~rmangntly maintained adjacent to the westerly
property line, excopting L•he required front sekback.
7. ThRr in the event a pace), map i.;
reciprocal access agreemenC, in
At~orney, shall be rocorded wiCh
Recordor. A copy of the racorded
to the P].anninq De~artmeni• . "
-2-
reccrded on subject property, a
a form satisfactocy to the City
the Office of the ~ranqe County
z-greement shall then be submitted
E~C 88-322
r. ~ ~
. ~~•
< • ~
~,+'.f
r , i'
~
~f,: . 5 +i71Y~r f4
a aF~.
~r ~
T ,y
. ~ . , ,'.~'.~jrS
BE TT E'URTHCIt RESULVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commiss,~on does
hareby fina and determ3ne th,at adoption a£ this 12e~olution is expressly
predicated upon app].icant's compliance with eACh and a11 of l;he amonded
c~ndi.tions txereinabove set forth a; w~ll as the r~maining conditiona o£
kesoluti~n No. PC85-216. Shoald any such conditions, or any part thereof, be
declarod invalid or unenforceable by the final judc~me.nt of any courk oE
com~eCent jurisdic~ion, then this Ito~olution, and any approvals herain
contained, sha11 be desmed null and void.
d
THE I'OREGOING RESOLUTION is signed an,d approve~l by me thi.~ 21st day o~ ,1
November, 1988.
l ! 4 ~. ,5~r~.; -~r'.:__-% '
..'~ ,~.
CHAIRWOMAN, ANAHEIM ~ITy pLl+NNING COMMISSION
~ ATTEST: ' //~~ ~
'~ [~/ ~. . . ~Y~
/ /l
~~ ~ ~ ~~~ . ~ ~ ~v~~
SECRETAR , ANAHETDf C.ITY P[,ANNING C~I~fMISSI~N
;.': STATL OF CALTFORNIA )
~;, COU2dTX OF UF2ANGE ) s s.
y CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edit2~ J.,. I3nrris, SaCretazy of t2,e T~naheim Cit~ ~lannir~g
Comn.ission, do hereby certify r.hat the toreqoing resolutiun waS passQd and
~dopted at a meeting of the Anal~eim City Plan~ing Commisr~ion tield an *Iovomber
2].st, 1988, by thQ following vote of the members ~hereof:
AXES: CO'dMISSIONERC; FiOUAS, BOXDSTUN, CAFtUSILLO, F~;LDI~AUS, HERHST,
MC BURNBY, MESSE
NOES: f.'OMMISSIONERS: NONE ~1
ABSENT: CQMM~SS.ONERS; NOI1E
IN h'ITNESS WHERf;OF, £ havE har~unto set my hand this 2Xst clay pi
November, 1908.
C'
~.. ,
~.G:.~ - ~- if .GZ.v-.,,-.~.~
SECRF.SARY, I.NAHEIM CT~Y PLANNI;iG COMMISSTON
~~
-3- PC 88-322
`r;~
, ~ ~..
;,t,~ . , ; x'
.
,...
. . . . . . . ..... .. .._~~. l.'e:1~~V: ,