PC 88-334',` ,. ~.. t~:+t~ i o:: ~• i ~
1,?~, + . , , ,1 , i ,;~
, ~ : :r , ~ ,=i
~'
'.; a:~
~p •'~i~
~.F.~OLUTIOid Np. PC8 -334
A R~SOLC7TION Gi THE ANAHEIM CITY pL~1bTNING COI~Lti1ISSI0Yd
THA:i' PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 3863 BE GRANTiD, IN PA~2T
. WHERhAS, the Anaheim City Plannin
g Commission did receive a
<•? verified Petition for Variance L•'rom MEI,VyN LANE HENKIN kND rAITH HENKIN,
:'' ~3. Pico B~ulevarcl, ~2Q1, Los Augeles, ~A
FRANIC, 735 La;sme Avenue, Wilmingt~n, ~A q 9a064 10951
. owners, and SPESCO C/p ~K
situatQd in the City of AnaheS.m 074~' agent, oF certain real ~roperty
c~esc.ribed as: ~ Coun~y of Orange, Sta~e Af California
;; PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN t1N A MAp ~'i ;,ED IN BUOK 100, FAGES
~ 1? AND 1F3 Ur PARCEL MApS II1 THE OFFICE OF TFiE COUNTY
; RECORDEH pF~ ONT.N~E COJNTX, CALIFORNIA.
~
; PARCEL~ :1 AS SHOWN ON TITAT CERTAIN LpT LINE ADJLTSTMENT
PI'~AT RF.'CORDEI7 FEBRUARY t,, 1979 Ip B00~ ~3026, p~~;g
1493 Or OFFTCIAL RECqRDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, C~LIFORNTA.
at the Civic Cen e~r Ain the City of p,n3heimomon SNovembe a nold a
notice of said publir, hearin Public hearing
q having been dul ~' 1~88• a* 1:30 p.m~,
Y given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Ar.aheim Municipal Code, Crapter 18.03,
to hear and consider ev~iden~e fdr and a
gainst said proposed variance and to
investigaCe and m~ke findings and recommendations in connectior, therewith; ~n
said publi~: hearing was continuerl to the mee~i,ng of December 5
d
, 1988; a.nd
WHERFAS, said Commission
and shucly made by itself, anQ in its b~half f ter due inspeation, investa~qation
evidence alld r.eports off.exed ~ a~d after diiR con~icler~tion
followin at said heariny, a~es find and det~rmin f al:l
g fac~s: the
~• T:at the petxtionar ~LOposes waivers of the folZowiny to
can~±:ruct one (1) free _stand.ing sign and 3 wa11 siqns:
~A) SE~T1427~18~9-~Q.~1.O1Q
1 ~~rQ91~Q14
n 1 -$.`~QS 2 .._4.~
~B) S~C,.~zoN~18.U~. ] 02
~n 18.84.0~ 62 U4Q
- Permit -~~ s}~~ inq~~~_l~ n ~~ic~ion,
tune 20 squaxe_Foo~ Qign on a 3~ iiich High
daccrat:Lve wa11 permi.tted in the Scenic
Corriclor; one 16a square-fant 20 foct high
f.reo-stanC~iz~g sign proposed)
- ~rmi~t d wa)~1~~n~.
(.1_ per business ma_n entrance psxm.itted;
3 pruposed for Aazon Bx•others Art M
art)
Z• Thar t;he abave-mentionec3 wai ~er A
.y grant~d to permit one
42-Q.~uare foot monument siqn subject to approvalhof.eth~ Gi~y ~rafEi
~~~d qranti.ng w8i~er ~g~ on the basis that there are speci~l circumstance
a~plicable to the Propert C~ngineer
surroundings whicYz d~ not a ~uch ds szze, shlpe, topographv, location aiid
same vicinit Pp Y'~~ other identically xar~ed pso~ert
Y% and thst strict applicution ox ~~xe zonin Y in thR
properry of Qrivileges enjoyed by other prQp~rties in thsg identi al rzane and
classification in the vicinity.
0572r
-1-
PC88-334
- :';i:
",
., ~
~Y
~.
,'i:
,~:
;~~,`,~,'; ;
r~ <'
, . ~i~
,; ..
~b: t <!~. . . . .. .
r
, ... ~
y ~ i~'.~~`~ i~':
. . .,.t". ~ t
,>i
r ~~~ -`~
3. That there ~re exce~tional or extxaordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the property invelved or to t~he intent7eci use of tYle
property that do not apply generally to ~ht~ prop~~-' y or class o~ use in th~
sa:~~e viciniCy anfi zone.
4. That the requested variancc~ is necessary for the preservation
and enjoynent of a substantial property riyht possessod by otb.er property in
the same viciriity and zone, and d~nied to the properi:y in question.
5. That the req~~ested varianca wi11 riot be materially de~rimental
to the public welfare or injurious to the gropexty or improvements in such
vicinity and zor.e in which the pr.operty is located.
6. Thac no ane indicated their presenco at said publi.c hearing ir~
oppasit•ion; and thQt no corr~spondence wa$ received in oppor,ition to subject
p~ti~ion.
~ALII'QRNIA E;NVIR 23MENTAL t~UALIT'Y ACT FIidllING: Thar the Anaheim
City Plunniny Commissic.~n has reviewed the proposal to construct one (1)
freostanding siqn and 3~vall signs with waivers ac permitted shopping center
identz.Eicat-,ion and pexmit;:ed wall Siqns on an irregularly-shaped parcel of
J.and consisting of appro~cima~tely 6.5 acres located at the soutliwest corn~r oF
La Palma Avenue and Imperial Iiiqhway and furthor dsscribed as 5640 East T,a
Palma Avenue; and ~oos hereby approve the Negative lleclaration upon ~i.nding
that it has considered ~he Neqative Declaration togekher with any c~mments
received during the puhiic review proress and Eurther f,inding on th~ basis o~
Che initial study and any comment; receiv~l that ther$ is no substantiial
eviclence thal-. the project wi11 have a significant e£fect on h.ho environment.
NOW, '1'FILREFO~?E, BE iT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commissi4i1 does hereby grant Qubjoct Petition for Variance, upox~ the
tollowing conditions which are hereby~ found to be a necessary prerequisi.te to
tk~e proposeci ~xse of the s~abject pxoperty in orcler to presex•ve the safety and
ye:neral welfar~ of the CiL-izens of the Cit:y af Anaheim:
1. That the new co:ist.ruction authorized by t:~is resolutian shall be s~rvec3 by
undErground utilities.
2. That the legal owner oF subject property sh~ll irrevocably offer to
dedic;ate to the City oi Anaheim ~n additiuna'~ strip ~€ land a?ang La Pa1ma
Avenue, measured wesL•~ir1y from the u:.timate righ~,-o.f=way line at tl:e
corner of the inCersectian of La Palma Avenue ana Imperial I?ie~h~aay, and
~~ar~-in5 in width from twelvQ (Z2} feet~ fnr tk~.e Pirst three-hundred (300)
i~eL• and tY~en tiansitaoning f.rom tweive (12) feet to p feet for the next
three-hunclred (300) feet.
3. That unlcss a varianc.e is appliod for and granted, lighting of ~ignage Eor
subject prop~rty shall be prohibited between the hou:s ot- midizight to 6:30
A.M. as ~pecified by Zoninq Code SecCioii 19.05.Q91.052.
4. That the owner of subjec~ property shall submit a letter rAquesting
tarminaCion of VarzanaP No. 3090 to tY.~e Zoning Division.
`2- PC88-334
~ ~ ~'~'
inr
;, .
,;(f. i r+ :~, ~ :~` ,,,, ; ~ a ,e, :~ , ., . ,
. . ~ ~~. i.: . ~: ! 4 . . ~~.. ,-.. ~ . ~. . ~ . • ~. 1
~. ~ .. ~ ..`i~ ~ ..
~ . . ~...~ . ~. ~. ~~~: ~. . ... . ~..... .,r
. . . . .., . . . . . .. . . , 1. . ~ . . . , .. ...
Y~~, ~~
;~,~:
~'~
.;
~
~ `r
, ~i
5. That an encroachment ~,ermit shall be ~btai_ied from the Citp o£ Anaheim for
the freestandir~g sign on La Palma AvPi~ue, which sign is located witha.n the
azea of critical ,inY,ersectian dedication required ir~ connect~.on with
Coi~dition No. 2, above-mentioned.
6. That ~ubject proparty shall be devel~ped subs~antially in accordance with
plaus and specifications on ~ile with the Citv of Axiaheim i~~arkQd Exhibit
Nos. 1 through 3; provided, however, that a maximum of ~ne forty two (142j
square fooi: monument sign sha11 be permitted subjQCL to approval of the
City Traffie Engineer, insteacl of. tk~e proposed pole sigii .
7. That, grior to i ssuance af a bu9.lding pe~rmit, or within a period of pne
year from the date of tY.is xesolction, whi~he•rer occurs first, Condi~ion
Nos. 2, 4 and 5, abov~-mPntioned, shall be complied with. ~xteasions for
fur~her tim~~ to complei:e said conditions may b~ gxanteci in a~cordance with
Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim MunicipaZ Code.
8. That prior to final building and zonirsg inspoctions, Condition Nos. 1 and
G, abcve-mentioned, shall be complied with.
9. Tk.at appraval. of this applicatian consL-itutes approval af the p-0p63@C~
request or~ly to Y.he extenL- that it compZias ~with the Ana}ieim Diunicipal
2oning Cor3e arid any other applica?~le City regu.lations. Apriroval does not
include any action or iind~ngs as to compliance or approva7. vf the YQCjIi@St
regarding any ot;her ap~licab?e ordinance, .regulation or requirement.
DE TT FLJ~2THER RESt~LVED that t~1a .F.naheim City P~ anna.ng Co~runissi~n
does herFby find arid u~t.~rmine that adoption of this Re~~lution is egpressly
predicaLed ~~~or. applicanC's complisn~e wiCh eact~ and a'I ~f ;,i~e conditions
herein~bnve set fortn. Should any stxch conditions, ar any part therea~, be
declared invalir~ or unenforceable by the £inal judgrnent oE c.ay c4urt of.
competent jur.isdiction, then this Resolution, and arzy approvals l~erGin
cuntai.ned, shall ,he deemed Yiull and void.
TAE FORGGOI*TG RES~LUxION is signed and approved by me thi;; 5th da~r
of D~cember. 19R8. r ,:'
~ ~l,, ~%~r.t,t~ i%~ ~f~.-"'~Y=r~ L
Cf~AIItWGMAN', ANAHEI,~ CITY PI,AN'NING COMhlIS~ION
A7"I'E ST : „ i:'
--- ~--'~~`~~L~!~? --- • ~:
:;
=;,r
~ ~ ~,'~i ~~
~ ,~?~4
: ~
,"~
-:~~
.';{;
PC88-33~ {
' ~;
~ ;~~
r
~.r;,.
r ~f r.
~
~
_ _ __ _ _ ,.. ~ .~.!lts,~~
SECRETI~RX, At7AI~IEIM ~I'~Y PLANNING CQMMISSION
-3-
i~i7~
I`t `
. . ~ .-'~j;~~
'i
~ ~~~~:~:~
<s':
`:;;i
~;y
,r
s~:
.~~,,
STATE QF CALIFORNIA ~
~
COCJNTY OF Ok2ANl;~ ) ss.
CIxY OF ANAHEIM ) ~~'r
I, Edirh I,. Harris, Secrr~tary of the Anaheirn Cizy Planning _ ,1r
Cammission, do hereb,y certi£y tY:at the foregoing resalutio~ was passc~d and
adopted at a mQer.ing of the Anaheim City Flanning Commission hQld on De~csmber >'~;;
5th, 1988, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONE&&: BAL.~.S, BOY'BSTiTN, CAR~JSILLO, rELDHAUS~ HERBST, MESSE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MC ~1?RNEY '. ,:;;
ABSENT: CUMMISSIONERS: NOIdE ~ '-i
'.,
'i
Itt WIiNESS WHE~F.OF, T ha~e hereunto ~et my hand this 5th day^ of f'
December, 1958. l~/~~-~"-' -~'~ ,~~~1~ -
SECEtETA Y, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISc~IUN `-'-
~:
;
: :';:
o,
`1M
~f`,
tl,~
~~:~
. ~ '~~;.i1,
: yt
i;r~
: ~`r:
';i
f~
; . ,~
r;
~ ~~:
t~
,~
,j..a1''.;~.,~ -~ ~ , . ,.. , . . . ~... . ~ . ..
~1:k,
>:j:;
/' : y,'~
;~
';'~
F'.;~
xr
;,/a.
~~•'Y
.~~~
... ~':.;i
rl~:
' ..~.1~:~.
~ry
ii(?;~
";;
' ~~'i
-4- PC88-334 :a~~
, r~t
~, a ~
,
, ~. i .~~+,4
. . . . . . . , . ~ . ~ . . . :, ~r. J .:,fl