PC 88-335, ~ l~
~ ~'Ly
R E SQ_~.9T ~.Q.~._~~._~'S~Q_~.~ ~
: A RGSOL'JTION OF THB ANAHEIM CITY PLA2dNING COMMISSION
THAT PETJTIOt7 FOR RECLASSIFICATION 2d0, 88-89»22 BG GRI-NTED
WNERF.AS, the Anaheim Ci~y Planning Commissfon did receive a
verifiAd pet3 tion for P,eclassiticali.on fram DiJRFEF GARDcNS, FARTNERSHIP, 17pp
Raintree Ro.,d, Fiillerton, CA 92635, owner, and llR. RONALA -~ROWL~X, ].700
Rt~intreQ Roa-d, Fu1lQrton, CA y2G35, ager.t, or cQr~ain real proper.ty siCuated
in the City ot Anahoim, Coiinty oL• Or.ange, State nf (;alifornia, described as
fol2~ws:
BEGINNING AT A POTNT IN THE NORTFi LINE OF VTNFYARD
''J1 A-•l, AS $FI4WN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOGK 4, Y'AGF;S
i' 629 ANn 63U OF DEEAS, RGCORDu OF ~,OS ANGELES COUNTY,
~• CALTF'ORNI1~, SAID PTNT BEING 164 FEET WESTERLY OF THE
'' NORTHFAST CARNER THEREOF, R~lNNIrIG THE~TCE SUUTHERLY
} PARALLEL TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SATD L~T, 225 I'L:ET;
THENCE WES'TEkI~Y PARALLEL TU TEiE NARTFIERLY L'!NE OF
SATB LOT 75 FF,E1; THENCF, NORTHERLY PARALLEL TO SAxD
~:ASTERLY LI-~1°, 225 FEET TO A. POINT IN THE SATD
, NORTF3ERLY LINE; THEc1CR EASTEKLY AI,ONG ~AID NCRZFIERLY
L'It7E 75 FEET TO THE P~~INT OE BEGINNING.
THAT PORT.ION OF I,OT A-1 OF ANANEIM 'JINEYAfiD, IN THE
CI'PY OF ANAHEIM, COliNTY OF ORArIGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNTA, AS PF.R MAP RECORUEU IN Afl!)K 9 PAGES 629
AND 630 OF' DF.EDS, RECORUS OF LOS ANGEL~S COUNTY, TN
THE OFFICE OF TFiE COtINTY RECORDEI2 OE $AID COJNTY
DESC~TBED A
S ~OLI,OWS: ,
BEGINPIING AT A P~INT IN THE NORTH L.l'NC QF LOT A-I A5
SHOWN ON A_ FfAP RECnRDED IN }300K 4, PAGES b29 AND 630
OF DuGDS, RkCORDS OF LOS ANGELES COU~TY, CAL,TFORNIA,
SAID POYNT B~ING 239 FEET WcSTERLY OF TNE NORTHF.AST
CORIiER TIiEREOF, ltUNNING THEPtCL SOUTHERLY PARAi.LEL TQ
THF EASTERLY L7NB Ok' ~~ ID f,AT, 225 FFET; THENC~E
WF,STERLY PARALLEL TO :t1E NORTHBRLY LIl7E OF' SAID C,O.,
67.5 FEET; THENC~ NOETiiBRLY PARALLE:L TO SAID EASTFRC~Y
LIPiE 225 FEET TO A POINT IN SAID NORTHEHLY i.INE;
THENCE NORTII~f:LY PARA[.LE;L TO SAIA ~ASTERLY LINE 22~a
FEET TO A .POIN2' IN SAIU N~RTHERLY LINE; TIl~;NCF
EAuTETtLY t\LONG SAIU NOl2TFIERf.Y i,TNE 67.5 F~ET TO THE
POINT OE' IIGGINliTNG.
WNEREA~, tho riry Elannin~~ Commission did hold a puk>lic hearing ~,t
tlie Civic Cc~ntQr in the Cir.y oE Anah~.im an Novem~er 2I, 1~88, at 1:30 p.m.,
nuticQ oC said public hearing having boQn duly yiven as r.equiroci by law and i.n
accordanco wlth tho pr~vi3ions of the ~nahe.im Mur-i~ipa2 Coclo, CtiaptRr 18.C~,
to t~ear and co»si~d~r evidonce :Eor ancl against said pr~poseci reclassffication
and Lo in•~QUr.igar.o and make findir~gs and recommenc]ntfons in connecrion
the.c~wir.h; and aafr,i ~uhlic hcarinq w~s cuntinued ta t:he rt;eoting of Doc~mber 5,
29R8; ancl
05'l5r ~1_
PC88-335
: f:
;;.~
~ ~
a~ ~
~
~ ~
which ara hereby fou»d to be a noc~ssary prereguisiL•e to the praposed use of
subject property in order to proserve tho saf~sty and gon~ral welfar•e of the
Citiz~n~ o~ the City of Anaheims
1. That a E~e shall be paid to th~ City of An~heirn .for stree~ lAghting along
Norrh 5troet in an amount as r~stabli~had by City Cour,cil reaolution.
2. That the legal owner of subject property shal7. irravocably offer to
;~.;; dedicate to the Ci~y of l~naheim a strip of 11nd forty five (45) fee~ in
;; wiath irom the centQrline of. the sL•reet 31ong East StreeC for stret~t
widening purposes.
3. That a cash pzyment shall be made tfl the City of Anaheim for the cost of
the removal of existing sL•reet improvements along East Stroet and
reconstruc~ion/construction oE full street improvements at the ultimare
].ocatio.n.
4, That a fee shal7. be ~iaid tn the City of Anahoim for tree planting alqng
North and Gast Stceets in an amourit a3 ?stabli~k~od by City Council
resoiution.
5. Th~t t?ie owr~Qr of subject property stxa.ll submit a 1Qtter requestinq
termination oF Roclassif.icatiun No. RS-89-07 ana Variance 2Ia, 3822 to t.he
Zoninq Division.
6. 'fhat in the event a parcel map is not rc~corded combining the four (4)
existing lol:s, thQ leq~l property ownor shall furnish th~ 2oning Division
with a copy af a recorded covenant and agrc~ement in a form approvi:d by tne
City ht~orney agreeinq to hold subje~t property as one (1) parcgl.
7. That rr3.or to the introduction of an ordinance rexoning subject property,
Condition Nos. 1 through 6, above-•mentioned, shall be completod. ThQ
pr~visior,s or rights yranted by this resolution ,hall becone null and void
by acti.on ~f tti~ Planning Convnissip~i unlesz saicl conditions are complied
with within one year from rhe date of this r~tsolution, or such iurthor
timQ as the Flanning CornmissioY~ ma~ gran~,
8. That epproval ~f ;:his application constitute~s approval af tha pr4posed
reque~t only to Che eactent that it c~mplies with tho Anahe3.m Municfgal
Zoning Code and any ather applicable City r.eg~ilations. Approval doe:a not
include any act:an or f.indings aa to compliance or approva7. of the request
rRyprding any ~ther app73.cablE ordinance, regulation or requirem~nt.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anat~eim CfCy Planr.ing Commission does
horeby find and der.ermine that adopkion of rhas Rosolution is expressl}~
predicated u~on ~pplicant's compiiance with each and all of the conditi~ns
horeinabove seC forth. Should any such c~nditions, or any part theraof, be
d.eclar9d invali~l or unenEorceable by ti-o ffnal judgment ot any c;ourt of
compet~nt jurisdiction, then stiis Rosolution, and any approvzla herein
conta.ined, shall be do~med null ancl void.
__.:_~
'3" P(:Oa-335 -~~
.;.~,-r ::..; _ .
:,,,
.. ;;:
:,,
a ,~'
,~
% ~v~;•F1
WHEREAS, said Commission, aLter
and study mado bx i~sell and an its hQhal~, and
evicience and xepor.ts offdred at said ~~caring,
followinq facts:
~
due 3.n~pection, invQSt3,gatian
aflec due ~onsideration of s~ll
does ~incl and c~etermino the
l. That thQ petitioner proposc~s rec:.assif.ication of subjoct
~roper~.y from rhe RS-7200 (Rosidpntial, Singl~-~amily) Zone to the RM-3000
(FtQSidential, Mu.ltip]c~-Camily) or a le~ss int~nse zone.
2. That the An~heim General Plan designates suhject property
f.ar L~ow-Modium Dcnsity RQSiden~ial land us~s. As ap~,roved by the City
t:~uncil on 3antiary 2G, 19f18, under Gener~l Plan Amendment No. 23G.
3. Th3t t,he prop~.,ed reclassi£ication of subject property is
nec~ssary and/or desirabl9 for tne orderly and proper develn~,ment of the
communi~y.
4. That the proposed roclacsificatian of subjec~ property does
properly relate to tihe zones and Cheir permittecl uses loc~lly established in
c.lo5e proximity to subject pro,perty a~:d ~o the xones and their pe:mitited uses
generally establ.ished L-hroti~hn,~r r-,.. ~~~.M;;.-t ~...
...,.r .
5. That the pxoposed reclassif•ication cf aubject property
rHquires the dediaation and imprcvement of abuttiriq streets in accnrdance with
L•he C.irculation Element. of the General Plan~ due to the anticipato3 i.ncrQaso
in traffic wY-.ich will b_ gonerated by the intQnsification oP land use.
6. Z'hat twelve ('12} peop:Le inc3icatr~d their px•esence at said
public he:~ring in oppositi.on; and that no correspondence was receivad in
oppoe;ition to subaect ~etition.
~ALIF' RNIA __EIJVIRONM£NT'~_QUALITY A~T_FII?DIKrG: That the Anaheim
C.ity Planning Commission has reviawed tho proPos~l to raclassify subject
pr.aperty fLOm the RS~~2C0 (Residenti~~l Single-Family) 7.one to the RM-30U0
(Ra3idential, Multi-Family) or a.~ess iatense zon~ to permit a.1 and 2 story,
21-unit "afforclable" condominiiim complex with •.vaivecs o:f minim+un bui.ldir.g
site arE~t~ pgr iiwolling un.it, maximum structur•al height, minimum £ront yard
setbzick, minimum :-ear yard setback an~ minimum recraaCianal/leisure area or~
an irrcgularly-shaood parcol of land cox~sisti;~~ ~f approx3.mately 1.28 acres,
.located southwest of thQ sout}iwes~ carr~er o~ North and East Strc~ets having
approximato frontage: uf 145 feet on the west side oE East Street and 142
Eeet on the suuth side of North Stroet and further describod as 747-755 North
East Street; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon ~Eiradinq
that it has considc~red thcs Negative Declaration togPthAr wfth any comment~
recctived during the public revS.~w process and furCh~r Eindinq on the ba3Ss of
thQ iiiitial study and any r~orrrnonts received that th~re is no ~ubstantial
avidence th~.t the projec+:.-~i1.1 huve a sfgnifi~ant e~fect on the euvironmRnt.
2~OW, TEiEREI'OR~, BE IT RESOLVED that kho ~lnahe.im Ciky Planr~3ng
C~mmis~ion does hereby grant subject Fetiti~n for Reclas~ificaCion and, b~ so
doing, that Tit1e 18-Zoninq of ttie Anaheim Muni.eipal Cocle be amancied to
~xc:lude tho above-described pr~perty from the RS-7200 Zone an~ to incorF~orate
srsid describecl px•a~erty ir~to tho RM-3000 Zone uP~n thE fol:owing conditfor.s
°z- PCBtI-335
~
w
t~~~
~
~
. ' `,~ ~ ~ ~}
v•
4~
~
~.:
~',,
. .. ;:1;,'~
v
TH~ FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by mo this 5th dt~y af
Uecember, 19A8,
, ; / .•?
r'i '
._._ r GU-G ;• ~~. /l ~r~ +~=-~c._--..
CHAIEtWOMAN, •'ANAHFIM CTTY PLANNING COI~4+dISSIpN
~'
::} ATTEST: ' `;,:
,~ ~' ' ~ "
G, ~` , r~f ~,
__-~~ w-, :;;
; S~:Ck2ETARY, AIIAHEIM CIT'I PLANNI2dG COMMISSiON
~~' STATr OF CALIFORNIA )
r;, ~;
;~ COUNTY OF URANGE ) ss. 'i~.
~' CITY OF ANAFIETM ) ;
F
d I, Ectith L. Harris, Secrotary of the AnaYiei.m City Planninq "
'1 Gommission, do hc~raby cortify L•hat the forogaing resolutiun was nassed and ~~
+' adopted at a moehing ~~f tha Anahelm Ci.ty Planr.ing Commi~sion held on Docember
' Sth, 1988, by thQ followina vote of tne members theroox:
~
~',
AYES: COMMISSIONcR5: IIOUAu, BOYDSTUN, CARliSILLO, FELAHAUS, H~RBST, ~
r`;
MC. BuRNEY, MESSE;
NOES: CGbSMISSI6NERS: NONE
~ ABSB~IT: COI~MISSIONERS: NONE
IN AIITNE:SS hiHEREO~, I have hereunto s~t my hand this 5th day uE ~;
December, 1988. ..,
i { ~.~i~- ~J. C` ~-Y~.c.i
y--
'~ SECRETARY, AIi1~HEIN, CITY PLAN~ COMMISSION
~ ..
,
;'
'g' PC88-335 "''
'~I;:
a
{~rs
~ k.i~