Loading...
PC 88-342.. t~ , ~ ~ RESCIL~CJTION N0. PC$$-34?, s:~ A RESOI.,UTTODT OF TEiE ANAHEIM CITX PLANNING COMMIS5ION THAT F~TIiI0t3 POR VARIATICE NC. 3874 BE GRANT~D~ IN PART ;r , {t~s. ~ ,,~~5 f,~ n'~~ ~ _!~ WHEP.~AS, the Anaheim Ci_y Planniiig Commission did receiye a vox~ifiecl ~otitiox~ ~or Variance from Itichard L. Pierce, 14771 P1a2a Drive, Suite "G", Tustin, CA 92680, awner, oE certain r~al property si.tuated in the Ci~y of Anaheim; C~un~y of Orange, State of Calitornia described as: L~OT 31. BLOCK E Or THE LOItELE~ 'TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COtfNTY OF ORANG~„ S~ATE OF CAL:[FORNIA, ~S PEF MAP RrCORDED IN BOOK 29, PAGE 2A INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, IN THE OFFIC~ OF THE COUNTY RFCORDER OF 5AID COUNTX. WH~RFAS, the City Planning Commissian did hold a public neariny at t,h~ Civic Centor in the City of Anaheim on Novembar 21, 1988, at 1:30 p.m., r~otice of• said public hoaring having been duly given as required by law and in accorclance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Coc~e, Chapter 18.03, to hQar and consider evidence L-~r and against said propased variance and to investigat.e and rnake fi.ndings and rQCOmmendations in connecta.on therewith; and said gublic hearing was contix~ued to the mec~ting AeaQmher I9, 1388: and WIiF:REAS, ~aid Commission, after due inspec~ion, investigata.on and stuc~y made by itseli~ anc~ i~e its behalf, and after ~ue consideration of all evidence and reports c~£fered at said h~aring, does £ind and determin~ the following fa~ts: 1. That the pekiY.io~ex roquests waiver o~ the following undsr suthnrity of California Government Code SQCtion, 65915 co con~t.ruct a 2-story, 4 unit "af:for.aable" apartme~t groject: f A) E TI N 1$. ~2. 0~k.l • O10 - ~finim b i din site '~.re'~1_~e~ dwell3~ uni~,. (2 40p ,5~,_f~,_ Qermitted; 1, 52~ 8C7. ft~ propos~d) (g) ~B~T?~7 1$.~2_..Q6?•~2~ - M~xximum ~it~cover~ge_. (9~ permitted; .~ proposed) 2. That the proposed waiver (A) is hereby yranted pursuant to California Government Code Section 65915. ~<<: ~~:' a59sz u• ~-,, :s~. ' : .;~s~,' ~, ~`~,~G~ , `~ ,.. 5 , -1- PCSa-342 :-~'~. _ ,`;-~; .;~f ~S s ~~ . _. .:~~,~.: ~r;~ t+,i; ~,n1~?~ ~ , . . ~ ~~, + i ~ 7y ~~ ~ ~~~ 3. That the requestQd wa.iver (B) is hereby Cenied on the basis that i~ was deleted in connection with rev~ised p].ans submitte3 s~absequent ~~ - the ori.ginal public advertisement. 4. Tha.t tY~are ai•e exceptior.al or extraor~]inary circumstances ~r conditions applicable to the pr4pQrty involved or to the intended use of the ;:: i property thafi. do not apply generally 'to the propertx or class oE use in the ""~ same vicinity an~l zone. ,; 5. That the requested varianr.e, as qraiit~d, wiJ.:l not be material2y d~trimental to the public welfare o.r iiijurious to the property or improvemeats „ in such vicinit.y an3 zone in which tlie properLp i.s l~cated. i 6. That eight ~8) persons indicate~l thair px•esence at the December 19th public hearing and nine (9} per~ons indicated thei~ presence at the ;~ November ~].sr public hoar~~ng in opposition; and that na correspondence was ~ received in apposition ta subject petition. ~ALIFQRNIA ~NVIRI~NMEftTA'L QUALITY' ACT FTND'lNG: Th~t the Anaheim CiL-y Planniri~ CommissiQn has reviewed *_he proposal to c~nstruct a 2-stor~, 4-unit "affordab7.e" apartment praject with cva.ivers of minimum building site area per dwelling un~t and ma.ximum site coverag~ on a rectangularly-shaped parcel rf land consisting of ~.ppro~rimately 7,750 square feet, having a ~rantage of a~proximately 50 fQet on the easY si.de of F3ush Stroat, being Iocated approximately 275 faet suuth oE the centerline of Brua2lway z~nd further described as 322 South fiush Street; and doos hereby approve the Negative Ueclaration upun ~inciing that it ~ias considered the Negative Declaration togettier with any comments received durinq the public review process and further findin,q on the basis of the initial s~udy and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project wiZ1 have a signif.icant eEfect on the en~ironment. . 2?OW, THERErORE, BE YT RESOLVED tliat the Anaheim C,ity Flanning Commission doas h~reby grant subject Petition L•or Variance, upon the ~" fol~owing conditfons which are hereby found to be a necessary PrQrequisite to 'j, the proposed usR of the subject properky in orne•r to preserve the saEety and general welfare of the Citizen3 oE th~ City ot An~heim: l. Th3t ~ feP shall be pai.d to the C.ity oE Anaheixn Cor street; lighting alang Aush Street in an amount as dQtermined by City Council reso].ution. '~`t; -~ 2. That a fQe sha11 be paid to the Ci.ty of Anaheim Eor tree p7.anting along '~ Bush Str~at in an ~r~ount as determined by City Coitncil resolution. .~ ?. That pr.ior ta issuance of a building permit, appropriato park ~nd ~ recreatiun in-lieu f.eos sha17. be paia to the City of Anaheim in an amount 1`~;' as determined by the City Co~uncil. l' y Y~J ~ rre~y+n .. . . ~ ~ . s;! ~ 7 i 1f.v~~5' V S ~ f~ ~~;i ~ ~1~ 4. Tlict prior to assuance oE a building permit, the appropriate trafEic , signal assessment fee sha11 be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount as cletermined by City Counezl rasolution. 5. That thc~ legal ~wner of sub;ect, property shall acqui.re a recorae~ c~venant granting an access easemen~ fram thE 1ec~a1 awner o£ the property ' immediaCely north o.f subject property for ingress and agress purpnses to '._~ :-i ~„ suY,ject proQer~y. Said easement shall be designed in a manner satisfactory to the City TzaPfic Engineer and said covenant shall be in a Eorm saCis£actory to the City At~orney. A copy of the recaxded covenant shall be submitted ~o the Zoning Divisiun. `~, 6. That gates s2iall not be installe8 across the driveway i.n a manner which may advexsely affact vehicular traf.fic in the adjacent public stre~t. '.~ ' Installation of any gates sha_1 con£orm to the Engineering Division's ~ Standard Plan No. ~102 and shall be sub~ect to the review and approval of '~~ ~ the City Traifi.c ~n~ineer. 7. That trash storago areas tihall be provided and maintained in a location acceptable to the Str~ot. Mairitenance and Sani~ation Division and in accordan~e with approved plans on file with said Div,isiun. 8. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 9o rhat ari~r to :ssuance of a buildiuq pErmit~ the legaJ. pxaperty owner shall preparc and recor~ an unsubordinated covenant li:ni.ting aacupancy of each apartment un.it• to no more than two (2) persons (other than ahildren under the age of two (2) years) per bedroom. 5aid 'limitation sha11 be included in each 1Qase%rQntal agrecment. A aopy of the r.ove~.an~ shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney prior to record~•~ion. A capy oF the rocord~d covenant shall be furnished to the Z~ning Division. 10. That a covsnant sk~ail be recorded agreoing to prov.ide the renter of each awelling uni.t wzth written i.nformatian obtainc~d frum the School '; Di~tri.ct(s) pertaining to possible overcro,,dr•a co~xditions and uusing ; status of the schaoltsj serving the dwelling unit. ~ ' 1 11. That a~ire flow test of the water system ~o determine adequate wrater !'I; '~ ~ ~ prassure shall be conduct~d to the satisfaction of the Cit;y~ Water '" ~ r~ ,; a ~ ~ngineering Division. ';'i ; 7.2. Thxt, if requir.ed by the Fixe Departmen~ an.d Polic~ D~partment, all <~ ` r lockable podestrian and vehinular acc~ss q~tes shal'1 he aqu3.pped with a ' "knox box" devicc~ to the sakis~action of the City Fire Depar~ment t~nd the `~` '„; City Police Departm~ent. y, ' ! t~ , ;` } 13. That all air condiL•.ioning faci]ities and ~ther r.aot• and ground rnounted ~;S ~~~~ equipment sht~ll be properly shieldec: f.rom view and the sound buFferecl ~ from adjacenk residential nroperties. ''% 14. Tha4: subject property sha11 be dpvelopea substantiall~ in ar:cordance with ='i plans aiid specif.ications on file with the City of. Anah~im marY.ad Exhiyit r ~ ~ ' , Nos. 1 thrnugh 3. . ~ ~ . '~"~~ 0596r ;~(i i~ i ~,i~,'~~ ~ -3- PC88-342 >a; ~ ,~ ~~~ w;c . Mpy;sr.r r ,. , ,. ,Y~~f,,~ , , ~.~(:. ~ -,,.,, ror . . , . .. . .., . . .. ~ ... . .~~.' , i . '' ~ ~.. , . , ~ ' ::.:,~ '. . .. ,'~ _~., , 1 ~ ~ . . . . . . .. . ..... .. . .. . ... ,. , . , .,. .... . ~. ,,.~ „ _ .,., . .~, ,. ., . , i ~ i+, e'~;~~ ._ . . ., b'~f+ , , . ? B~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ n a~t , ~ ~ ,. 4,~ 1,` I 15. Thst: prior to isRUance ~f a builcling permit, or within ~ por3od oE ona year Er~m the Qate of this resolution, which~ver occure first, Condi~ion Nos. 1, ?., 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 r~na 11, abovo-ment3oned, shnll be compliecl with. ~xtensions for fttrther }imc~ to complare sald conditfona may be gr~n~od in accordanca with 5sction 18.03.090 of the A.;:aheim Municipn7. Code. 16. That prior t~ final bulldin~ and zonfng inspecLions, Condition Noa. 6, 7, 8, 12, I3 and 14, abova-mantionod, ~hall be compliad with. 1'l. That ,approval of t] request or.1y to the Zoning Code and any inclt~.de anl ac~ion re~Iuest regarding requirement. zis a~~licatlon cons~itutes approvc~l of the propose~ Qste.nt that it complieg witt~ the Anahe3m Municipal oCher applicable City requla~ions. Apprav~l does nat or findi,ngs as to comp.lir~nca ~r approval of the any otih~r anpl.icable ordinanco, regulatio; or BF IT FUFTFiER &ESOLVF.D t1-at thc~ Anaheim City Plaz~ning Commiasion doas horoby find and determine ~.hat adoprion of this Resolutio-i is expressly predicatod upon applicant':t t;ompliance with eacY; and t~l? of the condSL•ions hereinabovc~ set for~.h. Shot:ld a.ny such r_onclitzori;~, or any part therouf, be declarad ir~valid or uneniorceable by the fina2 judgment of any court of compQtent jurisdiction, then this Res~l.ution, aad any approvals herein con~ainod, 3ha11 be deemed null and voicl. THE FUREGOTl7G RESCLUTION is siynec3 snd appro~~ed by mF this 19th day of Decem'ver, 1988. , , •, ; ~~ J `~ - ; ~%`.1.;'~_..~:::: .!~: < <..~i_.:' CHAIkWphtAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNTNG COMMISSIOtv ATTEST: '~ ---- ~.~.~..~ _~ ,/ ~:`,___ SECRETAR , ANAIIGxM CITX PLAN. ZNG COt~SZSSION STATE OF CALIFC~RNIA ) COIJNTY OF ORANGE ) ~ s . CITY OF IWAHEYD; ) ~ ~. Edlth L. Harris, SecreL•ary of tt~o Anahe3.r,i C.ity Plannir~q ~ Commis3ion, do herobt curtify that the forec~oing resoluti~>n was pass9d and ~ adopteS aL• a mehting of r_hQ anaheim City Pla~ning Commission helci or. Dc~cember ? 19, 19A8, by the followinq vote ot the mambers thereor: AYES: C4NQY(ISSIONEKS: BOYDST(JN, CARU5ILL0, FF.LfiHA.US, MC HUR27~Y, MF.SSF ! NOES: COMMISSIONERSt IiOUAS, HBRBa"T a + ABSENT: COMMICSSUNERS: NONE IN WI1;t~.;S ~7~{~<<~Op, T have h~reur.to set my hn~.d th1~a 19th Qa~~ o~ Dect~mbor, 1988. °~ . J > ~ _._ ~~~.~.~=~ ,~'.~.1` ,d~,, - SE~RETARY, ANAf3EIM C:TY PLANNI~IC COMMISS 0 -- , ~,•. , . ~ ~. ...'~a:)~i