PC 88-37r'""" f
RE~LiJ'LIOt~ N0. ~' ~ ~~Z
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PL1~NN'ING COMMISSION
THAT PETITIUN FOR ~rARIANCE N0. 3748 B~ GRl.NTrll
WH~RFAS, the Anaheim City Planning Gommission did reroive a
verified Qetition f.or Variance fr.om IIALDWIN BUILDING ~OMPANY, .'~ GEPlERAL
PARTNER5HIP, 16a11 ha18 Avanu~, Irvine, CA 92714, owner, anc~ DTANA FIOARD, TIiE,
IiALDWIN COMP1~t'!Y. 1681n the C tiy e of.IrA lahQimA Cout ty oferi Orang~cer. 5~~~@rQOi:
property situated i
Califoxnia dP:~Cr.ibed as:
PFOPOSEU TRACT N0. 1326% BEING A SUBDIVIS70N OF THE
r^OLLOWITIG:
TRACT NQ. 2 OF THE LAND ALC,UTTSD TO T'ELYPE YOFtBA I2~
THE DECREE OF E'ARTITION OF THE RANCHO SANTIAGO DE
SANTA 7~NA, R~CORDED IN HOOK "B" OF JUDGMENTS OF THE
17TH JUDICIAL uISTRICT COURT OF CAL~IFCR~ZIA, 7N T:iG
CUUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, M~RE
PART'LCUT~AItLY 1~ESCRIE3EU AS FOLLOWS:
BGGINNlNG AT THB SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE T.RACT OF
THOMAS XQRIiA AS PER SAID DEGREE; TH~NC~ SOIITH 2%
DEGREE5 08' EAST 1254.00 FE~T; THENCE NUkTH 52
DIEGREES 52' EAuT 6955.74 ~'EET TO TFiE TiQRTHEAaT
BOUNDARY LIT(E OF THE P~;RALTA YOI~BA TkACT AS PER SAID
U~GkF.E; TFiENCE NORTH 27 DEG. 08' WEST '125~I.OU F£ET;
TFiFNCE SOUTH 62 DEGREES 52' WEST 6955.74 FEE'r TO THE
POINT O1F BFGIKNING•
'i ;t,~
WHEREAS, L•he City Pl~nriinq Commission did hold a publi.c he~arir-g
~t h.he Czvic CenLer in the City of An~heitt~ un Eebrunry l, 1968, at :L:30 p.m, ,
naL-zce oP said public hearing having boan duly givan as require~d by 1aw E-nd :.n
Chapter :L8 . Q:1.
accordance with tha pravisions of the Anaheim Manicipal Cuae,
to hear and consider evidence for and ta~ainst. sa:i.d proposed variance z~nd ~:o
invosti~ate ~nd make tinding~ and recommendations in conzi~cticn therew3th; ar~~i
WF;EREAS, said Commission, aEter due ~nspection, in~vestig~+ti~~n
und study maae by itsel[ anc~ in its bgha].f, anr~ a~ter 3ue c.onsideratio~ ~~E all
evidence and reports offered ak said hQaX•ing, does find and deternii~le t':~e
fullowing facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes waive~rs of ~he fol~.uwing kc~
establish a la6-lnt, RS-500()(SC), sinc~lo-family residential subdivision:
A187r
nC88-37
,~~ , ;
~~ ,
Yf;:
.!,,' ~ t .,.i v~
:~ .
f ~ :
~ ~ ir'1
dAr4~G.+n~ ~ , .. 1 . ,.,. , . .~, , , ,. ',', i~ ~ L~~,~.~~
.... !e.",. ..r , , ~ ,~ - . . . , +.7Y,
~r
,
, ,
, . :. ~ ~,. ,.,;,
.. ~;:.;
;:. ~. , . ~ , . . ~ .. . _ . , . ..
,..wT>.
(A) ~E. TT.ON 18.27.061,Q?Q Minimum Buildin,~c~,i~g Width
(.~0 f~. roquired; 2 lotg at
16 ft. pzoposed)
(B) SF'TI .T~.1~.27,Q61,021. inim~m Huildina SzteY. Wic~;;~h for
~,~1-~1e-5ac and Knu~kla Lo~s
(~l~ f~. requixed; 8 lots at 20 to 40
f~. Froposed)
f,C) SECTION 18.27,Q~.O.LU Pexmit~ed Orientation~~E Structures
(Structur~s required tn r~r-on
arterial highways;~ at~rucr_ure on I,ot
No. 75 proposed to s~e-on to Serrano
Avenue)
2. That the above-mentioned waivQrs are hereb;- granted on tho
basis that there are special c9.rc:umstances appJ.icable to the property such as
size, shape, topugr~tphy, location anQ surroun3ings which do not appyy to other
identically zoned proporty in the same viciniLy; and that strict application
of Lhe 7.oning Cocle deprives the pro~Certy of privileges enjoyed by other
pruperti~:s in the identical zone ~+nd classification in the vicinity.
3. Th~~ there are exceptianal or extraoi•dinary ci~~cumstances
or cunditions applicablE to the pr.~perty znvclved or to the intended use of
the property ~hat do not app].y generally t~ th~ proper~y or c:lass of use in
the same vicinity and r.orie.
4. That the requestecJ variance is iiecessary fox the
y~reser•vation anc7 enjoyment of a s~~bstantial proper~y righk possess~d by other
proporty 3.n the same vicix~ity and zona, and denied to thp proporty i.n ques*ion.
5. That tho r~questad variancg will not be ma~~ria~ly
detrimental to t;he public welfare or injurious to th~ property or improvemerats
in such v~icinity and zone in which the property is lc~cated.
6. That no one indicated their presonce at sai~ public hearing
in oppo~iti4:i; and that n~ correspondence was roceivad in oppositir~n t~
subject pet.ition.
~I~LIFORNI,~,1 FNV~RONMENTAi~ ALTTY_ 1~~T F'INDItJC~: That the Ana2ieim
'~;~>~r
~ ~Vy~ ~'
±~1}'.:
' ',; ~
:';r
4.'.-~
f ;^,
~' ~
City Plann.ing Cummission has raviQwed thQ proposal to establish a 156-1ot, .;;;;
RS-5000(SC), szngle-family resident:ial subdiviaion with wctivers o.f minimum
buildiz~g site widtl~., minimwn builaing site wiu'th for cul-de-sac and knuck~e
1ots, and permitted orioncation of ntructures on an irregularly-shaped parcel
of land located at the no.rthwestarly CoYner oL• the Oak fIiLls Ranch, to the '~
easL- of ~he Hiqh].axids at Anaheim Hills, and to the south of- Sycamore Canyon
Gnd further deccribed as pro~osed Tent3tive Tract: iTa. 1325%; and daes k~ereby
appzovE t1iQ tJeyative Declaration upon finc]ing that i.l-. has considered t;ha
`
-2_. ~C89-37 .
,,.~
<;_r1
::~,
. . .. . ..~~~
~r ~
;.
_ .,. .. , ...,.,.~z~,.~~~
,
ii t,7~
~ ~', ti~~
y '~!
~ ~ '~.~1
Nega~ive ~eclarar,ion toget.her with any cnmments roceived during the public
review process and further IlI1CX1T1CJ on khe bas.is of the xnitial stucly and any
conunents receivod that thare is no substantial ovicience that the projpct will
have a signiiicant eFfect ori the enviranment.
DTOW, THERGFOFE, BE IT RESOLVED that th~ Anaheim City Planning
Commission dees hereby
r
ar
t
b
g
.
.
~ti
ject Petition f~r Vari~nce, upon the
tollowing ~onditions whiclY are hereby found to be a
,,,
. necessary prex•ec{uisite to
the proposed use of ~he sut~ject properly in ordex to
reserv~ th
p
e safaty ans
general welfare ct the Citizens of the C.ity af Anaheim:
`~'
. '.;';;
Z. That a trac~ map to record L•he division oF siibject ~roparty r
sha11 be aubmitted to and appruved by the Cit*~ af Anan~im and
then be recorded in tho Oftice of the Oz•anqe County Recorder.
2. That f.ire s~rinklers sha11 ba iustallod for th~se residenc~s ~,'~
located Further than one hundred fi.fty (150} £eet frpm a publir.
str~~t.
3. That the legal ownex• of subject property shall record a -
rec:iprocal acces~ agreement between Lots 73 and 74, as shown on
Exhibit No. 1, to quaranL-ue a min~rnum twenty (20) Faot wide
shared dcces,,way from the pub:lie stree; .
4. That subjE~ct propex•ty shall be deve:oped substantially in
accordance with plans anrl sp~cificati.ar~, on t'ile with the Cit
y
of A.naheim mar.ked ExhibiL No, 1.
";~
,
:s
5. ThaL• pricr Lo commencement o.f the activuty apFroved hQrein, or
prior to issuanco of a bui].ding permit, or within a period ~f' '~~
one year from the daCe o£ thi.s resolu~ion, whichever occurs
f:i
rst
C
,`
.
,
ondilion N~s. 1 and 3, above-mentionecl, sh~xll be ,
compliecl wi th. Extensions Eor furl-.hc~r tirne to complete said
r.onditions m~y be granted in a~cordance with SeGtiori 18.03
090
.
of the AnahQim Municipal Code.
6. That prior to final build3.ng and zonin~ inspections, Condition
Noa~. 2 nnd 4, above-men~ioiiecl, shall be complie3 with. :~
7. That approval o£ this appli.catiun constitutes approval of the °
~~
proposed re,;uest on.ly to the extent'-. that it compli.es with tho
A .
;:}
naheim tdunicip~l Zoning Code anQ any o~her applicable City ~~
xegulations. .\pproval ao~s nat inc:iude any actian or findings ,
°",.f
as to compliance or approval cf khe requesk regarding any ~ther '
y
a~~plicable oxdin~nce, regiilation ~r requirement. '
r;+
BE TT FUfiTHER RESOLVED tha~ the Anaheim City P1.anr~ing Commission
d.oes hereby find a:xc~ detsrminP that a~opti~n of this Fte~alution is c~xpressly
predic~ted upon applfcant's complianae with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such condi~ions, or any parr ~hereo~, be
~eclared invalid or unRnforcQable by tha Fina1 judgment of any court of
competer~t jurisdiction, thon this f?esolutian, and any~ approval~ herQin -''''~
contained, shall. be dAC~macl null and vuid.
, -3- PC88-37
~:::
v~ ~ ~ . ~ . !
'~s - _ _ - - , ,,,:~'v~ ~s~.>yi:;~'i.l~As4;z,r sf::r.~.~tt'/,a.^'/$?~
;,sn`r'1
;riy `r lr~r~~ 1
~
< < ~!, ~
~ ;;:
_ .. ~'r'
. . .. ~;`;ri s
;'ii
•,1.
' THE FOREGOING RESOLUyION is sianed and ap~roved by me th°_; lst day
of: I'ebruary, 1988. ~
~
L.~'i,~.e~~ ~
~/ // ~ ' ..~ ..~_
.•r~~- ;~:
CHAIkMAN, ANA~iETM CITY PL NNING COMMISSIOi~ ~
:?,.:;
:,':;
r+V A^_'TEST: ;
~'. ~~
`" ' " .~
,~
,,,;
,
r..
~~ ~~-~ ...
.
,
~ ~
SFCRETA~Y, ADTAHEIM ~.
CITY' PLANNING C~MMISS:LON
i',:' STATE OF CAL:[FORNIA )
„! COUNZ'X CF ORANGF ) ss.
~ '~
,; CITX OF 1~1NAHELM )
T, ~C~lt~l i„ Harris, Secr~~ary of the Anaheim Citp Planning ?
Commission, do h~,reby certify that the foregoing resolu+:ion wa~ pass4d and ,%
adoptec~ at a meeting of the Anahaim City Planning Commission he].d an February ;';;~,
1, 198d, by ~lae following voke of the members thersoP: ~;`<;;?~
AXES: COMMIS5IaNERS: SOUAS, BOYDSTUN, (:ARUSILLO, FEI:,DHAU5, HERBST, ,^;
MC BUFNEY, MESSE ; ;,~;;,;
NOES: CQMMISSTONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE • •;•t;
IN WITN~;5S WFIEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand this lst dav of ~i
February, 19Fl6. ~;r
..~ % ~ ; :? ~ ,'''
l/ ~~t='-~~~ '' ' ,;
. "~ ' -~C.~r..c., !
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CJTY PLANNING COMM.ISSION ~'"~"
; ''9fi
:~-~
;:.y
;r
':~,'..
. . .. .,.:.:::~.
~r
_g_ ~ .:~:~,.
PC.gB-37 `?;~;:
~ .; ,,;,
;';'~!
~ ~,.,.
`: ti
;:~,~.
~,.~~
.
<<'~~
~~„~»~.~.~ ,,...~~.~.,...~.,.,~,.;, ~ M.~.,.~:~ ~„~ _ .. . : , .,.... ... S,
~ ~. /JT.,1N~::;wT~ .. . . ~r~~y...y.~~ . ....,,.,. ,..~,; _.. '..~.:rrr~ ,. ....,.~. , .,..:,...,~.... ~....,....,.. ......... . . .. , . :. ~~~r
- _ . . . . . ._... . . 1
i~