PC 88-52. 4
~l~ N~.
1
E2FSOLUTION N0. PC88-52
~
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
'PHAT PETITION FOR CONDTTIUTTAL USE PERMZT N0. 2977 BE DFNIr^.D
!; WFiEREAS, the Anahoim City Planning Commission did receive a
° verifiec~ P~tition for Conditional Use Permit from WORLD OIL CO~IPANY, 93U2 S.
' Garfield, South Gate, Caliioxnia 90280, owner and THOMAS J. SHEPOS, 9302 S.
i Garfield, South Gate, California 90280, agent £or certain real property
situated in the City o£ Atiahe.im, County of Orange, State of California,
~ clescribed as:
i
+ THAT PGRT'!ON OF LOT 6 OF DSIL~~ RANCFiO, TN THE CITY OF
f ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORA,IGE, STATF OF CALII'ORNI.~, AS
~ SHOWN ON '1'HE MAP RECORD~D TN BOOK 4r PAGF 7 Or
MISCELT~AtvEQUS MAPS, IN THE UFrTCE OF TH~ COUNTY
, RECORA~R OE' SAID COUNTY, UESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BF.GINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT N0. 2302,
AS SHOWN QN A MAP RECGRUED IN ~OOK 76, PAGES 29 TO 31
INCLUSIVE OF MISCELLANROUS MAP5, RECORDS OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TI3ENCE NORTH 0 D~GREES 2p MINUTES
20 SECONDS WEST. 252.00 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLX LTNE
OF SAT.D TRACT N0. 2302 TO THE SOUTiiWEST CORNER OF
LAND DESCRZAED IN A DEED TA C.R, YOUNG AND SONS FILEU
APRIL 22, 1949, AS INSTRLMENT N0. 17a$9, IN THE
OFFIC~ OF THF. REGISTRAR OF TITLSS OF ORANGE CQUNTY,
CALIPORNIA; TAENCF NORTH 89 D~GREES 39 MINUTES 40
SECONDS EAST 15(1.OQ F~ET ~1~,ONG 'PH~ SOUTHERLY LINE OF
SAID LA1~'D OF C.R. YUUNG AND SON,.S, TO THE `r1ESiERLY
LINE OF SPADRA FOAA, AS SHOWi1 C'N SAIA MAP OF TRACT
N0. 2302; THEIICE SOUTIi 0 DRGR~ES 20 MINUTES 2Q '~'
SECONDS ~AS~ 252.00 FEET ALONG SAIA WESTERLY LTN~; 1'0 ;<`~;
THE CENTER I.INE OF ROMNEYA DRIVF., AS SHQWN ON SAID :`•;
MAP OF TRACT N0. 2302; THENCE SOUTH 89 nEGREES 39
MINUTES 40 SECONDS WGST 150.00 FEF~T TO THE YOIN'~ UF ~~
BEI;INNING. ~i.
"r,~^ WHERI~AS, the City P1.anninq Cnmmittsion i:id ho2d a public hearing ~
at tlie Civi.c CentQr in the Ci~y of Anahaim on January 1$, J.988 aL- 1:30 p.m. ,
::~ notice of sazd pubiic hearing havi.ng b~en duly given as required by law and in
?:, accordance wzth the provisions of the AnahRim Munieipal ~ode, Chapter 18.03,
~i to hear and consider evzdence for and against said pro~ospd con~.ition~l use
>y permit and to investagate and malce findings and racomm~ndations in connection
~ therewith; aucl s~-id public hearing was continued tc+ the meetings of
f rebru~ry 1~ 1~1, and February 18, 1~88; and
0204r PC88-52
~ ~;~.;;~;~:
;`;;
_ `i;
S'!
, .. . . ,,,+~~>a
.
~
~
I ,i~ ~ a~~ 15~
.. ~~~ ...f ~~ta
. ~ . . i ~' ~'i
1.~ :~fi
~,~
f.S
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due ir~spection, invesCigation
and s~u~`l,, made by :itsglf and in its behalf, and after due consideration of a11
avidence a.nd repori:s offered ~.t said h~aring, does Ein~ and determinp the
following iacts: ~~
,, :±
l. 7'hat the propos.~~ use is properly one for which a '~
conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municzpal Code Sections i
18.44.050.060 and 18.B7.Q23.0'l0 to wit: To permit a cunvenienc~ marl~et with ;:'i
gasolinQ sal~s and c~~°.f-sale of beer and wine in conjunation with a 3,570 ~
square foot commmerciaJ. cenker: >.I
S~ECTI NS 18_U,~050.G22 - Hiinimum number o£ gar}~inc~_s~ar.es,
AND 1.46.06h.050 (~4 required; 3]. proposedl
2. That the proposed use is hereby denied on the basis that
the concur.rent salp oE beer and wine in conjunc~ion with gasoline sales woald
patent~311y con~ribuCe to drivin7 and dr5.riking ~roblems,
3. Tlaat the proposed use is hereby denied on the basis that
thP parking waiver wi11 cause an increase in traffic congestion in the
immedi.at~ vicinity and adversely affQCt a».y adjoir_ing land uses ~nd granting
of the parlcing ~raiver will be ~letrzmentaZ to the peace, health, safety and
general w~lf are of the cit.izQns of the City af Anahezm.
4. That the proposerl use wil.l adversely afft~ct the adjoining
lanc~ uses and the grawth and dov~lopment of the area in which i~ is proposed
to bo 1oCai:ed.
5. Tl~at the size and shape of i;hP site proposed f~r the use is
not adequate to a11ow the fu13. dPVelopment of the propcsed uso in a manner no t
deL•rimental Y,o L-he particular area nor tu the p~ace, lsea].th, saEety and
general welFara ~f the Citiz~ns of the Citp of Anahaim.
6. That tYAe gran~ting aF L•he Conclitional Use Permit will be
deY.rimsntaZ to the pea:.e, health, ca.fety and general ~aslfare of• the Citizens
of the City of Anaheir~.
7. That the traffic generated b~• tlie groposed use will impose
an unduQ burden upon Lhe streets and highways desiyne~ and improved to carry
*he Lrattic in tho ar~a.
8. That no one indi.cated kk~e~ir presenc~ at said pvk+lic hearing
in opposition; and th~t .no r.orrasponcienca was receivod in opposition to the
subject petition.
'2' PC88-52
. ~
~"~~,
initial ;tudy and any corrun~nts received tha~ there i~ na substantial evi.dence
that the project will have a significant effect on t~ie enviranmPnt.
. . . _ .. . i i " "'.; ~ .~?rvx~n`r~T~
.`4v
~~ ;4~
;:x
>''i
. , ~~,fl
CALIFORNIA EN'JIR A ENTAL_QUALIT'Y ACT FINDTN~: That the Anahe3.m ;~
City Planning Commission has reviewed the pr~posal to permit a convenien~.e ,
marketi wich gasoline sal.es and o~"f-sale of beer ard wine in conjunction wzth '~~
a 3,570 square fQOt commeraial center with a waiver of minimum number o£ K
parking spaces on a rectangular.ly-shaped parcel of ].and consisting of :`,4
ap~r~.:imately 4.68 acre located at th~ northwesr corner of Romneya llrive and
,`;':
Harbur Boulevard and further ci9scriL~d as 1201 North HarYsor Boulevard; and ~,,;4
does hereby approve thE Negative Declaration upon finding that it Y~as :j
canszdered the Negative llec~.aration togei~;~er with any comments received `"~'~
durinq the public review process and £urther finding on the basis o£ the '~'
NUW, TFi~R~FORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby deny subject Fetition for Condition~l Use Permit, on
the basis of the aforernentioned findinas.
'.fHE FOIlEGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved b~~ mP this :17th
clay o£• February, 19a8.
> ~ /l,er~-~.-
CHf~tIRMAN, ANAHEIM. CT' PLANNIPTG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ - ' " ~~ v~~~ --
SEC~tETAR , ANAI~ETM CITY FLI~NNING COt~II•tISSi~N
STATE OP' CALIFORNI~ )
C4UNTY OF ORANGE } ss.
CIT.X OF A;.~TAH~IM )
I, *.:dzth L. H2rris, Secretary of. the Anaheim City P.lanninq
Commission, r]G hereby certifZ~ that the foregoi.ng resolutzon was passed and
acloptc~c3 2~t a meetii~g oi the Anahoim City Planning Commission h.e1d on F~bruary
17, 1988, by the fallowing vote of the members t~hereef:,
AYES: COhII~ISSTONERS: BnUAS, £OYDS'PLTN, FiEFiBS'!', MESS~
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CARUSILI.O, FELDHA'US, MC T~URNEY
AB5ENT: CpDiMISSTONERS: NOi1E
~ TN WITN~:SS WHEEtEOF, I have hereursto s~t my hand this 17th day ~y
of February, 1988, ~~.~
~ J '~~
~~'a _.~,~~ !'uLC.ccr/ ,' i
~f4., S~CP.ETARY, ANA.HEIM CITY PLANNT.NG COMMISSION ~;
I ~ 45
d~ y;;
_3_ .~
..: ._. . PC88-52 . . . :~
~~ ,,,
,~,
F i,~l
3 i f
i ~~
i ~
~
n r + ,,.
4P
:r ~
917 - ~ ~ r ~ -~{~
~Q#V t'~~~~yi( ~/ '' ... . . . .. _. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . }f~
.yX'3N+~1.Y7'.h~l. t . . . . ~ . . . .... . - . , ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~. . .. . , i'. t~,~k.