PC 88-55RE,~OL~iTION N0. PC88-55
~ a. u~ 1 1 u'~ ~~ 4~1 i 1'<'x ,~.
~~ ~y~ ~~~~
~ ~ i1 i ti Y 1~iF~v
.~ ~~ ( 1 ` + ~ .'
~
} ~?~
~ ~;31
' 1y~
j.r
1:i{
~"i~
C'r r
A RESOLUTION OF T:iE ANAH~IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION °.':;~r
THAT PETYTION rOR CONDITIONAL U'SE PEEtMIT NQ. 2984 BE DENIED :1`;:4;
WHER~AS, tkie Anaheim City Planning Commissi.on did raceive a
verifia3 Petition for Conditional Use Yermit from WONS~N KiM & HAE ~OOK KIM,
1].443 ~. Stapleton Court, Cerri~os, California 90701, owner and D. W. I(I2r4rIEL 'i{;
COAST INC., 747 S. Brea Bou;evard, Suite 33, B.rea, Califoz•nia 91621, agent '~
for r.ertain rea7. property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, ~;;:~
State of Cal.ifornia, describPd as: ,.';'.~~
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QiIARTER !?E' TH~;
~; SOUTHWEST QCJARiER OF S'F.CTIUN 5, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTFI,
b;, RI~NGr~ ].0 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, AS SHOWN ON
°' A MA~ RECORIIED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MTSC~LLANEOUS
,,
;~i MAPS, RECORDS Or O:RANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRTSr.D
~` aS ~OLLOWS:
BEGII~N'ING AT TFiE INTERSRC'r~ON OL' THE WEST LIN~ OI'
5AID SOUTFiWEST QUARTER 43TTH THE WESTERLY PROLONuATION
OF THE SOUTH LINE GF L,UTS 149 TO 152. INCLUSIVE OF
TRACT N0. 2J93, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN AOOIt
76, PAGES 45 TU 48 INCLUSIVE OF SAID MISCF.LT,ANEOUS
M.APS; T'HE~ICE .~iOUTH 0 AEG. 19' 44" WEST LINE 103.59
FEET; THENCE 1dORTH 89 D~G. 40' 16" EAST PI~fiALLEI~ WITH
SAID SOUTFI LINE 27~.00; TH~NCE TTORTH 0 DEG. 19' 44"
WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAIll WEST LINE 88.59 FEET; Tk:ENCE
NOR'PH 31 DEG. 17' 34" WEST 17.99 FBET TO AN ANGLE
POTNT ON THE SOUTHFRLY LINE OF LOT 152 OF SAID TRACT
N0. 2093; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEC,. 40' 16" VvESx, ALONG
SAIU SOUTH LII1E, 261.00 I'EET T.0 THE POIN'T OF
BEGINNING.
WHER~;AS, ~he C3.ty Planninq Cummission did kirrlti a public hettring
? at tne Civic Center in the City of An3heim on Februarv 17, '1988, at 1;3U p.m.,
notice of said public hearing hav.ing bepn du7.y given as requzred by law and in
'"' accordF~,~ace wiL•h the provisions oF the AnahQim Y~unicipal Code, ChapCer 18.03,
4;_r, to Yiear 3nd c~nsider evidence £or and pyainst said proposed condition~l use
°~.'s. permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendat;ions in r.onnection
~i~~ ~herewith; and
WH~P.EAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation ,',,;,'~
and st•.dy mada by itself• and in its behalf, and after due consideration o£ a11 '~
eviderice and reports ~ff4r~d at said he3rin«, does find and de~ermine the ~•"~~,
followinq facts: ;~~;t;,
~ . ~' ~;;,;
,~ :~;
020'7r
,
`~ . .
PCfiB-55 :;;~
~ :~;
',;~s;
.~~
_ ~,
~.,
'~'~
,1. ,
t~
k,
~ ~.
~,
~ r:^^~`s~
,
, ,, ,,~
a ..~, i .. . . ~ ~:, .~~,,}LunY4w~:VS7[~
.~
.,>
~
1. That the proposed use is properly one f.or which ~
conditional use permit is authorixed by AnaYiein~ Municipal Code Sea±ion
18•a4.U50.160 to wit: to construct a 2-story, 3o-unit motel with waivjlrs o~
the £ollowing:
(A) SE~TION l,g 9~r},~62~01'1 -
~B) SE TTONS 18,p6 p5~zp241,
7•8 . p6. 080 an~
1Q.4_4.066.050
Maximum at-ructural heiq)1~.
(~ feet permitted a3jacent to norrh
property line [abutting one-L•'arnily
re~idential zonix:~); 17 fe~t
proposed)
- Minimum nur_,~jex of arkin
_sp..a.;:es. lDeleted)
2. That thP rpquested waiver (A) i^, hereby denied on the basis
~h~~ there arR no speaial circumstancss applicable to th~ property such a,,
size~ shape, topogr~p;••~, :~QCation and surroundings whir,h do not apply to other
ider-tically zoned property i.n the sam~ viciziit
of th~ Zoning Code do~s noC de~r3.ve the property ~of hprivileges aen ,oy~~ 1by
other proparties in ~he i6entical zone and classiEicatiorz in the vicinity and
that approval of the waiver would have an adverse effect on the ac{jacer.t
single-~~ily resident;ial zon1,,,,
3• That t,he requested wz~~~r (g) is hereby denied on ~:~e
basis that it was deletec~ bp re•rised g.lans which wEr~ submit~eci .ubsequent to
the pub~ic natice.
4• That th~ proposed use is hereby dQnietl on the basxs that
the srea 2lreacly has an exisling traffic probl~m and ~h~t• the 2-s~ory motel
would increase the area ~xagEic and would have a:~ adverse efter.L un rtl~
adjacent singlc~_tamily residential neighborh~od,
land uses anc~ he g owth~andPdevelopmen~ f~he~area ein wh ~h ti~ heg aajoining
to be lqc~.t~d. ~r.oposed
~. That the s:ize and s2~a~e of tho site propased Eor the use is
~ot $~lequate to a11~w the fu11 developm~nt oL- tho proposed use in a manner nat
8etrimenCal to the particular area nor to the peace, healt.h, safety and „
general we1£are o~ the Citizens o£ ~he City of AnaY~eim.
r:~
7. Tk~at the granking of the Conditional Use Permit undQr tho
condil:ions imposod, if any, will be detrimental to the peace, heal~h, safety
and general welf.are of tha Citizens Qf the City of Anaheim.
~. Th~t the traff.ic generated by the proposed use wi11 imp~se
an unduo b~zrden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry
thc tra Ffic in the a;; ea.
-2-
PC88--55 ~'~
~
~
~ : ~ ~' ~~
~ ~ r~
~.~ 4 ~ ',.:r
~ a ;~
~, ~
;v
i
9. That 14 puopla indicaCed their prosence at said pub].3c
hoaring in oppnsition; and that no corrsy~por,denca was seceivod in oppr,~i3tlon
: t:o the subjocG petitton.
~kl%~F'4R~L~ ENV7RO~.IMLN~1~ ~Q(jpL~~Y AC~~'lNU,~I.¢o That the Anaheim
~' r_it,y Planning Commisszon has reviewed Che proposal to construct a 2~~;-COry,
;;~ 36-unit motol with wa3vars of maximum s~re~ctural height and minimum tiumber of
parking spaces (deleted) on an ir:egularly-shapcd parcel of land consisting
of approximaL•ely 0.54 acre on ~l~e aast sicie of Brookt-urst Strc~et,
anproxim~kely 103 fee~ souCh of the conterlino oE F~almo~ith Avanue ~nd furttxer
; doscribeti a~ i142 Nurth Brookhurs~ Streek; and does hereby approvo the
~ Ncgacive Declt:ration upon finding thar. it ;iase cotisidered erie N9gative
i Uecl9rat:oii togo~her w3L•h any comments receive~~ Quring the public areviow
~ process and further fin~ing on the btisis of the initial study ancl any
comments recQlved that there is na sub~tant.iul ~vidence that the project w311
havQ a significant effect on the environment.
:",^. NOW, TH~REFORE, BE IT R~;SOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
~`. Commi~sion does herQby deny sub;iect Petition for Conditional Use PQrmit, on
~ the k,~sis ~f the aforementioned f5.nclingn.
~~,
~'.' THE FOR~GOING RESOLUTTON :s signed and approved by me this 17th
day of February, 1988. /,
~'-.~ ~19'x"'" (~' ..~L~-c_
Cf~AIRMAN, ANAHEIM CI Y PLANNING CObQ+fIS5I0N
;
A'1'TE:ST: ~
f f
/ ' /
~ ~Jt-~~
i SEf:R~TARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CA?QMISSION
S2ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
C~UNTY UF ORANGP. ) ss.
x', CI L'Y OF ANAHEIt~! j
I, Edith L. Fiar.ris; Sec•rotary of th~ Ana~eim City Plannfng
Commi~ssion, do hac~eby Ccxtify that the foraqqing resolution was pa~sed and
n8opteci at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Comm..ss.ion held on February
17. 1988, by the fol'lnwing vote of the memb~rs thereaf.:
.'1YESt COMMISSTOITRRS: f30UAS, ~UtC~TUN, FiERBS!', MCSS~
NOES: COMI~ISSIDNS:2S: NONE
ABSEN.'C: COi~tISS10NERS: CA?tUSIi.LA, FELDFIAU5, MC BURt~~;Y
IN WITt:ESS t•iHEREOF, I have her~unto sec -r,y hand Chis 17th day
~~ of February, 1988.
,{
__~.._._::~..~~~_____~~~-~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_
~
t SECRETAFY, ANANEIM CI1'Y PL71n::''!~G COI~LM2,5SION "
~
~~ '3° PC88-55
.
;~
~:.p
^`t