PC 88-06~
~,,
'1
~
I
~
s~
ftE OLUTION NQ~ PC88-Of>_
~
A RGSOLiJTI OF THE ANAHEIid CITY FLANNING COMMISSIpN
THAT PETITIC~~ r'OR RECLASSZFICATION N0. 87-88-33 BE llENIED
WHEREA t~ze Anaheim City Pl.anning Commission did reaeiv~ a
verified pet5.tion for Reclassification from LA QIITTA J. K'YNDA, 3603 Savanna
Street, Anaheim, CA ~2801, CONNIE RAE HALL, 3621 Savanna Stre~t, Analieim, CA
92801, LUCIQN W. AND BARFiARA B. MYLES, 3fiQ9 Savanna Straet. AY~aheim, CA
J2801, ROBEkT AND LINDA ALIA~R, 3613 Sacann.. Street, Anaheim, CA 92801, o~•-^.ers
and MAUGY HANNA, 4000 MacArL•hur Blvd., !l680, Newport Aeach, 92660, agent, fox
certain real ,property situated in the City of. Anaheim, Coun~y of Orange, Stai:e
of California, described as Follows:
7'HE L1\ND REFLRRED TO IN THI5 RE°OKT IS SITUATED TN
THE STATE OF CALTFORPTIA, COiJNTY OF ORANGE, CITY OF
ANAHEIM, ~.ND IS DESCRIBED AS FO~,LOridS:
LOT 19 OF TRACT NC. 74~, AS PER MAP RFCORDF.D I~I BOOK
22, PAGE lOr OI' MISCEI,Li~NEOUS MAPS, IN TF1k; OFFICE UF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID CO'JNTY.
EXCEP7'ING T,HEREFROM THE WESTERL`.~ 43.48 FEET THEREOI'.
y; :
;4
~..:
r~ ~
•;. i
+~'~~~ ;
M'
~~:J: ~
WF~ERE~.:,, the City Planning Commission did hola a public h~ax•ing
aY. the Civic Cen~ter in the Ci~,y of Anaheim on Novem~sr 23, 1987 a~ 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public liearxng having heen. duly given as required by~ law an.d ia
accordance wi'tk~ thQ provisions of the An3heim Municipa]. ~ode, Chapter 18.03,
~o hear arid c:aii~ider evid~ence for and agai.nst said proposed real~ssificat~.on
and t~ inv~stigate and make findings and r.Qaommendations in. connection
therew:.th; ~snd said ge~ii:ion hav.ing been con;.inued to i:he mesting of
Janu.3r; 4, 148E; and
WFiEREAS, said Comcnission, after due inspecLi~n, investigation
and study made by itself aixa in ikw behali, and after ciue consider~tion of a11
eviclence and reports offered at saxd hearing, doe~ find and determine the
following tacts:
l. That the petiti~ner proposes reclassi.Eication o~ subject
pz•ope~rty £rom the RS-A-43,OOG (Re~icie~L-iaZ, A,gricu].tural} 7one to the RM-1200
(ResidenL•ia2, Multiple-Ftimily) or a less intense Zone.
2. That the Anaheim Gnneral Plari designates subjQCt property
£c~r Low-Medi.um Uensity Residential land uses.
3. Tha~ the propossd rec:lassiPScatian of subject property is
not ncacessary nar desirable for the orderly ancl proper devalopment oF the
c~mmunity. '
4. That the propo~~d reclassi£i.cation of subject property aoes
not properly relaCe to the zone9 ax~d their permittecl uses locally estabtished
in cZosQ proximity to subject property and to ihe zones aricl tih~ix permitted
uses gonera2ly established throughout thQ commiinity,
0155r
PC88-06
,
^ ~ ;;.
,~'F~.~
~ ;,~
_ „J
~
-;•','
.;
~ !z;~:
'?
:r,
,,;
}~?,
. ~,
;;,;;;~'
,,;
~'~
;~
~
';;
•; i
~
1~~~
I
6. ThaL- 10 persons indicated their ~resence at the ~iovember '`~I
23, 1987 public hearinq ~nd ~.0 people at tl.e January 4, 1988 public hPar.ing in
opposit~.on; and tha~ a petition containing ap~roximately 39 sig~~'_ures N~as
xeceived in opposition to suhject pe~.it.ion. ``
ALI~_QRNIA ENVIRONMFNTAL~ _QU_ALITY' ACT i'INDIN~; Tha~ the Anahsim
Ciry Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify su,bject
property iram the BS-A-43,pU0 (Resic~ential, Agricultural) Zone ~o the RM-120Q
(Residential, Multi~J.e-Familyy Zone to construct an 86-unit, 3-story
aparkment complex with waiver o.~ maximum structurai height an an
irregularly-shapecl parcP]. or land corzsisting of approximately 2.39 acres,
located on i:he north side of Savanna Streef, having an approximate f'rontage:;•
oE 332 feet orz the nottb. sicle o~ Savanna S~reet and a max.imum depth of
apprnximately 38~ feet and being 1ocaL-ed approximately 660 feet west af the
centerline of Kno#:t Street and ~ur~Yier described as 3603, 3609~ 3613 ~na 362I
Savanna StxPet; and do~es hereby approve the NeqativP Declaratiion upon findinr,
that it has considered the Nagative Declara~ion together wirh any commenks
received 3uring the p~iblic .r~view pror.ess and further finding on the basis oP
the initial studX and anp comments received that there is no suhstantiial
evidence that ttle project wxll rave a significant effect on the envi.ronment.
NO~V, THEREFOR~, BE rT RESOLVED that tk~e Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby d~ny Petitioxi ~or Reclassi..f.icaL•ion an the basis of the
af~rc-:m~ntioriecl findings.
THF. F~RE~OTNG RFSOLi1TTdN is signed anrl approved by~ me this 4th
day ot January, 1~88. .,
-- ~~~?~~%l~~~p
CHI~IRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY ~LANNING C4MMISSION
A.TTEST: ~
_ ~,~ ~C~~~~- .,~'~,.J ,~~~ .
-~~~ , ~ , __
SECRETARY, ANATiEIM CITY PI,ANNING COi~1ISSI0N'
,:.~
Oi55r
-'l. -
PC88-06
;~ :,r-
,;,;
.;~
;!
••NS~~Vkd4M4.Y.'1(!d.^..Y'1~'r.~ ...~,i..~.~.~ '.~~.-..~,..:.:n .......:... ......~.._...... ....._ .. ........ . . . ~ .v~ I4^~,
f;
s
..^~
;'r ~r~r~
~Lt !s`;~,'v 3~4
~ . . 7! ~ '~""
' pY
• ~'`~~
, A., ~~a?i
~''^,~
~;'''t
;t.. r.e
S1'ATE dF CALIk'ORNIA ) . . .`.. '::':n:!
;<<~~,~.
COU:TTY OF ORANGE ) SS ~ ~ ~''
~
(.ZTY UH AN'AHEIr.
) ::'
'~
:
,
s
,
;':,
Commissi
I, Edith
on, do hereby c
L. FIarris, Secretarx of the Anaheim City Planning
~rt
if
th
t
h 'r
~~~
adopted
at a meeting o~ .
y
a
Y.
e toregoing resolution was passed and
the Anaheim City Plannixz
C
i
i ~~
4, 1988
by tlze Fnllowing g
omm
ss
ori held on January
vate of the members thereof :
~'~"~
~
AYES:
NQES COblMISSIOIvExZS: $f}YI7STLTN, CARUSILLLO, H~RBST, MESSE, 1+
: CCMMISSIQNERS: HOUAS, FELDHAIJS, MC BURNEY "'~"
ABSENT: COMMrSSIONERS: NON~
January. Iri WITNESS
1988. WH~REOF, I ha~ve hereunto set my hand this 4th day o£
,~
;y~ ~
~ ~ ~
y
~~~
~•;
,
C(h ,, ,
.
.
,, L
..r,
S~CRETARY, AN,AHEIM C'LTV~LAIvNTNG COMI~;TS3?pN
:: ~;
(' '
'
'•,, .
~~
.. U15~r
tF ~t;;;
;iC~i~;~
6;~~'i';",i
. a~..:
-3-