PC 88-72~
:,~
RESOL 2'TQN NO PClif3-72
WHEREAS, the AnafieS.m City Planning Commission, P.O. Box 3222,
Anaheim, California 92803, did initiato a ver•If.ied peti~ioa for
ReclassiEication for certain real property sit•uareci in t~he City of Anaheim,
County oE Or.anqe, State oE California, described as follows:
A RESOLUTTUtv Or THE ANAHEIM CTTY 1~L.\NNxNG COMMI5SION
THAT PETIT'!ON FpR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 87-{~8-41 }IE GRANT~D, UNCONAITIONALLY
ALI~ THAT CERT.AIN LANI? SI'TUA'J.'^aD IN THE ClTY OF
ANNiEIM, COUDTTY OI' ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFOkNI~-,
DESCRTBED AS FOL~,OWS:
LOT qNE (1) Or^ TRACT NO 3027., AS SHOWN UN A M~1P
RFCURDLD IN BOOK 97, PAGES 4 AND 5 OF MISC:ELLANEOU~
iriAPB, RECdRDS OF SAID ORANGE CGUNTY.
WHEItEAS, tho City planning Commission did hold a public hearing
at the Civic Center in the Ci~y of Anaheim on March 14, 198& at 1:3U p.m.,
notice of said public hear.ing tiaving beon ciuly given as roquirecl by law ~.nd an
~ccordartce with the provtsiens at the Anaheim Municipal Codo. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and aga.insC said pr~posed reclassification
and to invesriqata and make fi.ndings ~nd recommend2tinns in connection
th~rewih.h, and
WHERF.AS, said Commzssian, a:ter due inspection, investigation
and skudy mado by itself and in its bQha1F, and aEter due consideration of a11
ev.idQnce and reNorts offered at said heariny, does find and determine the
fellowing Facts:
1. That thF3 City Flanni.ng Comm:s;~ion. p.ropo.3es recl~gsifzcatxon
of 3u~ joct property f!:URI RM-1200 (Residential, Mtilt.iple-1'amily) Zona to the
RM-29U0 (RQSidenti~l, Mulriple FGrni.ly) or a].ess inten~e zoi~e.
2• That Lhe Anaheim General Plan designaies subject p•r.operty
tor Medium Aensity Resaden~ial.
3, That the pr.oposed rec.lassiiication ot subjoct, propert:y 3s
neces3ary nnd/dr d~sirable for the orderly artd prapQr d~~velopmeiit oL• the
community.
~
~
,~; p ~r~,yr~
, ~,
.:~.
:1. °
: ~,
,~
4. That the proposed c~eclassitication oE subject property does
properly rRlate Co the zones and their nermittetl use3 locally astablished in
c).oso proximity to subject propo~ty and t~ th~ r.o~,~~ and L•heir garm:It~od us~s
yen~rally QstabliaheQ througtiout the corrununlty.
0224r
PC88-72
`e
i:
O,
/ '.le.ti.ilF P i'i1,~„ . . . . ~ . , ,
4
~
~
~
. ~,, ~
r'~
5. That tho praposed reclassific~~ion of. sub~sct prc,per~y
raquires the dedication ancl improvement of aaut~ing streots and a11~ay~ in
accordance with ~he Circul~t:ion Element of tlie Gener~l Plan, due to thc~
Znticipated incre~se in trafPic which will be generated bx the in~ensi'~ica~ion
o.f land use.
6. Thar. no one indic~ted th~ir pres~nco at saicl ~ub'lic hearing
in opposit:ion; and L•hat nu corresnondence was raceived in oppo~ition ta
subject peL•ition.
~I_ FORNZA ~NVI~t~TIMENT~L OUAL~TY ACT F~~jUIN~: That ~he Anahoim
City Ylanning Commission has revxQwed the praposal to reclassify subjer.t
prorerty from ~he ItM-1200 (R~siden~ial, Mul~iple-Family) zone t~ RM-2400
(Resideni;ial, Multiple-Fam:ily) aone on an irregularly-•shapefl p~raol of lancl
consist,ing of agpro~:imately 9 acr~s loca~ecl ~t th~a norther~st cc~rner of Ball
Road and Cm~irQ StreQt and f:urChex de;;cribed as 2045 West Hall Road; 3nd does
he.reby approve khe Ne~~aGive Declaration upon findir~g th~t it has considared
t,he Nagativ~ neclaration togetixer witt~ any comments raceived during the
public review process und furthar i'inding an the basis of the inirxal study
ana al1y c~mments rQCeived ~hat there i3 no substantial evidence that the
projec~ wi3.1 have a sic~nitic~nt eEfect- on l•ho environrtient.
vr,~r, TIiEREFORE, EiL IT RESOLVEA ~hat the Anaheim City Plt~nninc~
Comm~ssion does herPby grant subject Petition For Recla3sifiaat.'soz~
un~ondiCiona].ly and, by so cloir.g, that Tii:le 1$-Zoning of the Anaheim
Municipal Code be amonded to exclude Lho abovQ-desc.rS.bed proper~y from ~he
RM-1200 (R~sidential, Multiple-Family) r.one and to incor~orate said dQSCribed
~r4pesty int~ tho RM-2400 (Residenlial, Multiple-Family) zarie.
THE FORE~OIPTG RESOLUTION is signecl arid approved by ma this 14th day
oE March, 1988. ~
~~
. ~ ~~
~;' ~
C:,wIRMAN, ANAHFTM iTY PLANNING COt~IIYfISSION
ATTEST; /~-j
~-~~, ` ~- ~/ //
~ i l~-'~-~ ~~'1.~;_
SECKETARX; ANNIEIrf CZTY PLAA''NING COMMISSSON
-2-
PC88-72
~;,,.
,.
. f.:
"J
,.,~
~;
t
~.i
~ ~;
,,..
;.
;
~
,i
~~ ` ~
:.a
.~, ,
,
•r?'~:,
y:~.,
%,.
,. ,
.~ r
.,.rt1; .i •:`I . i~~t . . ,~t.:. ~ i~ . r; ;-
. . _ ...:!r . ::i~ v i ~
,'~~it'. h . ' r84i .r_;i .
:i,.~c
` ~n- ,
~:~.' ^gF` i, '~~~,
.. .
~ ~ ~ ~
~
; ~~ r' `'~~ A~
. ~i
STATE CF CALIT'pRNIa )
COUNTY OF ORA.N'Gk: ) ss.
CITY OF ANAI3ETM )
j. I:dith L. Harris,
Cammission, do hereby certii:
t S~ecret:aa^y of thc~ Arzaheim City ~lanning
hat I
y
adoptecl at a mceting of the
' :he foregoing resolution was pas;~ed and
Anatiai.m Cit
y Plannin
C
i
Marc
h 14, 19a8, by the fallow~ing ,
g
omm
ssion held on
vote oi the members thereof:
A'tES: COMMISSIONERS; AOUI~S, B()Y7)~;TUN, C~4RUSILT,O, FFLDHAUS, HLRBST
DSESSE ,
NOES: COt~ITSSIONERS: NONE
ABSENi': COMMl^aSION'ERS: MC ;BURNEX
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,, I
Dfarch~ 1988. have hereuni,a set my Y~and this 14th day of
~1
.
~
f
--•...__.Y. 1
~
~
~-'!-C.ac........_..
S EC i:ETAR~
AiiE I
hf CI'rY PLANNING COMMISSTON