PC 88-83~
!1'~A:]LiiY~4~ `L`Lr~`.Y.t....5.y v.8 » 8 3
~
A RESOLZJTIOt~ OF' THE ANAFIBIM C1T1 PLANNT~'G CQh4rfSSSION
ADOPTItvG 1~iD RE(:Ob44ENDING TO ~:HE CITY CUUNCIL ADQPTION OF
GENERAI. Pi,AN AMENDMENT. NU. 227 - LAND UuF. ELEMENT
~~
~ - .•~~ ~~~,~~,
1~~~
i~}
3
4~
WI~EREAS, tha C.ity Council af the City of Anaheim did a~topt the
Anah~im Genaral Plan by Rpsolution No. 69R-G44, showing tho ganeral
dosc~~ption aiad exr.en~ of possible futur.e dove].cpment wi.thin the ci.ty; and
WHERET.S, pursuant: t~ itistruction Erom the Anahefm City Planning
Commission to considor an amendment t~ the Land tlse ~lement of tne Genecal
Pian redesiqna~iiig subject aroa from the cur.rQnt Modium Density Residontial to
Low-Medium Bpnsity R•»i~lontial, staff prc~pared a General Plan Amendment for
the study arQa consistfng of approximately 95.6 net acres (~1G.7 grass
including streets} q~nerally boundad by Anaheim BoulQVard to ~he west, ~ypress
S~reet ~o the south, the Union PaciEic Railway to the c~aat and I.a Pa1ma Avenue
to the north (excludin~ the araa boundad by WiJ.halm.ina Stc~eet to the nortih,
Sabina S~reet to the w~st, Sycam~re StreQt to the soul•h and the Union Pacxfic
Rail~•~ay to the east); and
4rHEREAS, the Pl.anning Dep~rtment deQmed it appropriaCe,
pursuant to the provisicns uf the California Bnrriror.mental Quality .A.r.t, after
re~iew of L•he proposal and Initia2 Study that there are no significant
envzronmenlal impac:ts ancl recommended that a Neqat.ive Declaration be approvQtl;
ar.d
WHER~AS, the AnahQim City planning Commi~sian clid h~~Id a publie
hearinq aL• tho Anaheim Civic Cenr.er, Councxl CY.amber, 2~0 South Anaheim
Boulevazd, in tho CiL-y ~f Anaheim on March 28. 198a, at 1:30 p.m., notice of
said public hearing having bean dulg givon as re~quirQd by law and in
accordance with the pr.ovisions of tt~e AnahQim Municipal ~ode, Chaptor 10.C3,
to haar and consider evidence for anc7 againsr_ said. propo~ed general p.lan
amendmenL• and to invostiqate and make findings and rec:ommendations in
connection thgrewitii; and
WHEREAS, s,xid Commi~sion, after duQ consider•aLi~n, inspc~ction,
investigation anN aL•udy made by itsc~lE, nnd after di:e con3ideration of all
~;vi.~lence and reports ofFered at sai~3 h3aring, DOCS HSREflY FIND:
l. Thar tho City Cou:icil requo~ted opini~ons of residonts in
subject study ar~a at the.fr Marcli 24, 19f37, mee~ing
rogardiny poL•ential chanqes in th~s land use designa~ion.
2. That nn Novemcer 20, 1987, the Central +~ity tJt~fghh~rhood
Council submittQrt fhc r~sul-_3 ot a GQneral Plan ~nd Zos~fng
Survey an3 corrosponding map to s1~ow noic~hborhood sul~rr~rt
C237c
PC88-B3
, .:=:a=~~
; ~~
~
~~
„,;
~
~f +ari tunen~~nont to the General Plan for reclasignt~tion f.om
Mediurn DorisiLy Residential to Low•-Med3um Donsity
Rcasiclan~ial lanc~ uses ancl a corrospondinq rer.lassi.fication
of portions of the subject study ~rea.
3. That approximatoly 75 p~rsons indica~ed thoir presanco in
favor of subjoct aroandment al: L•hr~ Mi~rch 20, 1983, public
hearing; 7 porsons indicat~ed thair presence in o~:pasttion
to subject amendment aL• the March 28, 1988, put~lic
hearing; pRtitions anc~ ].etters containing app~o7cimatAly 4Q
riqnaCuros were received in opposition to subject amendment
and approxfm~Cely 269 signattires wero received in favor of
subject ~nendment; and
4. That based on a 34'6 response raCe, ~pproximately 859~ of thg
responclents favorad an aunendment and reclassification
r8ducing the permitted densit.ies from 36 dwel3.ing units per
acre to 18 dwellittg unit;s per dcre.
5. That a lower density would reducQ demands f~r publir,
services.
f~• That ~tudy area curzently contains a mixtvre of residential
uses, all o£ which are nermitted under the current Medium
I)ensity Residential c3esignation.
7. That the aroa of single-f vnily resider.ces on Nort•h Strc~et
should be ~xcluded frorn this General Plan AmQndment ~tudy
arQa.
8. lhal• sufficient• evidQnce ~vas •resentod to substantiaL•e lho
ne~d for an amQndment to the Anaheim G~neral Plan - Land
Use Clemant - to Low-Msdtum Den3ity Residenti~l at this
tim3, and that adopCion ~f Exhibit A, redPSignating L•he
95.5 acras, ~xcluBing that portior. on North Stroet, for
Low-M3dium C~Qnsity Residantial is appropriato at this time.
~,
GAL~F~RNIA ~NV~gQt~~t~ ~h~,~~~~NpINGs ~hat the Anaheim
City Plannir.q Commiasion has revidwed the proposal to amend the Lan(1 Use
Elament of the Goneral Plen ko changa the currenk dRaignation of Medium
Density Resideu;.ial Go Low-Medium Density Rocidential land UII@3 on a~tudy
area ~rhich is generally rectanqularly-sh~pe9 anN consists of approxfmFtely
95.6 net acres (116 7 qr~ss acrds inclu~ing str-.ets) genorally bounded b,y
Anahaim Boulevard to tho west, Cypress Straet to the so+ath, thc~ Union Pacific
Railway to the east and La I~Almt~ AvQnue to the nortr. (exc2u8ing the area
n~»^~e3 by Wil: elmtna 5treet ~:n the nortih, Sabina Street to the west, Sycr.~r~ore
Streer_ to l•he south Ynd the U:iio~i Pucif{c Rnilway to the east)t anQ do~as
b.~reby a~pY~ove tho ~icgativc DoclnrAtfon upon finding that iC has considerocl
tt~e Noqat:iva Doclaration togettier with any comments received during the pub].ic
rov~ew prar.esa c-n1 furthor finding on the basis of the initi~l :.tudy and Any
comm~ents rcecofvad th~t thore 3s no subatantfal evidQnco that the pz•a~act will
have a significant af£r~ct on the environmcsnt.
"2' PC$8-83
~i~~ ~:,r u't ~~ ~ - ~ ,
,~~
`; ;!:~
' ;~
`. ,
;i
`~
7e..`b1 ,. ~%i11.41~ ~ ~::5tri,uiY h~a`~!~.4~ +,1'%r 'l~iY~lii;~ s~ ii ~ ~x.;
„ - . . ;1,~4~s 4 4 van~fr r , + -
. . _ . .... .. . _ . t, . . r. . ~ ,.?'t" ry. . ~'~.f ~ '~ ~,~;}; n~ X:8X1 i ~ ~ n~.rF~~,~~i ~~,~~,j ~Y~
, ~
~ _
~~'1~'~~
--anr
~
. ,
_,
.
~
~ ~ ~~
~'~~
~ ~:
r:
~~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT R:;SOLVFD, that pursuant to tha ahove
fxndings, Che Anahc,im City Ylanning Commissio
d
~k
y~
n
oe~s hereby ac3opt and recommond
to klie City Council of the City o£ Anaheim adoption of General plan Amendmont `.h
°`'~
No. 227 - Lt~na Use Elemen~ -- Exhibit A- tu redesignr~te study area L•rom Medium ';;;
Densitx l:esidential ~o Low-MQd,ium Dansity R~sidenh,ial. ,
"'':
THF FOREGOING RESOLUTIUN is signed and appro~~ed by me this 28th ~~`'~
day of Ma.rch, 1988. `r;
~ ~~
'
. \
/ /
~•~f~ tt ~
,
4
. !.!,~
:~
CHAIF2MAN, ANAH~IM C TY PLANNING COMMISSION ~ ~"
;,
ATTEST:
sp G~.c.-c.'G~~ •
----- -~-a
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLAITNi2:G (:OMMISSIOtt ,
~
STATE 9F CALIFQRNIA ) ;
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ~S ~`
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith I,. Harris, 5ecretary Qf the Anaheim Cit~ Planninq '
Commission, d~ heroby cerCiEy that the f~regoing resolution was passed anc~ ,-~;
adnptod at to moet~ng of the Anaheirn CiCy Planning Commis~ion held on
March 28, 1.98E, by the following vote of tnp members theraof:
AX~S: COI/,2~fISSIONERS: BOUAS, BOYDSTON, FELDF1AUS, HERRST, M~SSE,
CARUSII.'L0, D1C DURNF;Y
NOES: COMMISSTONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
TN WYTNCSS WfiBREOF, I have hort~unto set my hand this 28th day
of March, 1988.
--------~~~~!~aZ~~~-~~^(~ ~ rf`~ru''~-t--~%e c
S~:CRBTARY, ANAH~IM ~ITY PLANNI:IG COtrQrflSSZ0~1`
`~
r
~;
~ ~„~`,;
~;n
':
-~' PC88-83 `fi
~~
„ '.,.
r f,f~~,~
...~i°a~,.,.,...:_ ~:~