PC 88-86+r~
~ ~~?q ~
,;
:,
~iLQ~ N~Qs.~~~$4
~ A RESOLUTTON QF TFiE ANl~HFIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSTON
~ ~HAT I`ET'ITION FOR CONDSTIQNAL USG PERMZT N0. 2993 BE DCNYED
WH~RF.AS, the Anahoi~r City Planninq Commission did receiv~e a
varff.ied Petition for Conditional Use Pormit L•.;om ATLI-NTIC RICHFII~LD
CORPQRATTOtT, I7315 S~udebaker Road, Artesia, CA 90702-6911, owner and W.F.
~ REYNOLDS, 24705 LaGrima, Missiun ViQjo, CA 97.693, agent for cartain real
" property situat:E~d in the CfCy of Anaheim, County of Orange, State oE
Cali.fornia, doscribad as:
THAT PORTION OI' f.OT 30 OF laNl-IiEIN- EXT~NSION, IN THE
CITX ~P' F.NAHETM, AS SHOWN ON A MAP OF S[-RVEY MAI?E BY
WILLIAM FIAMEL A.*ID ~'ILED I,~ TH: OFFICE OF .'fHE COUNTY
RECORDER OF LOS JWGCLES COJNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNItJG AT A POINT IN TFI~ CF,NTER LINE OF WEST
STREET, 66 FEET IN WIBTFi, DISTANT THEREON ?.01.85 FEF.T
NOR2HERLY FROM THE INTERSECTIQN OF SAID CENTF:R LINE
WITFI THE CENTER LINE UF BALL ROAD, 60 FE~.ET IN WIATH,
AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTHFItG:' ALONG SATD CENTER LINE
OF WEST STREET, 201.85 FEET TA SAID CENTER LINE OF
BAGL ROA^u: TFIENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CFNTER LINE OF
AALL ROAD, 196,%0 FEET; THENCE HpRTHERLY AT RIGfiT
ANGLES TO SArD C~NTER LINE OF BALL RaAD, 1'0 AN
ItTPER~ECTION WtTH A LINE ~VFiICH IS AT RIGFiT ANGLF.S x0
SAID CBl7T~R Gi:1E OF WEST STREET AND WHICH PASSES
THROUGii THE Y4INT OF BEGINNING; THF.NCE EAST~;RLY TO
THE PQINT OF BEGINI3ING.
wFIERCAS, thcs C.iCy Planning Commission did hold a public hearinq
ah the Civic Cent~r in Lt.e Ciry uf Anuhe.im on March 28, 1988 at 1:30 p.m.,
riotica of said public liearfi:g having ~Qen duly qiven as required by law and i.n
~ccordance wikh tho provi~ions oE the t,naheim Muni.cipal. Code, Chag~er 1$.03,
to hear and con3ider evid~nce fur and ngain~t said proposed con~Itfonal use
permx~ and to LnvostigatQ 2nd make Eindings and r.ocommendati.ons in connaction
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after Que inspection, investiqatiun
anci study made by itsalf and in its behalf., snd ~-fter due conaideration of ~1;.
evidence und re~ortrs offered at sa.id hearing, doos fin: and iiet.ermin~ the
folloaing facts:
~,yv~-~j~ ~ ~4~L.
v~-"~ . . ~ ..:.5
'r5i
/':~
l. Th~t tho proposed us~ is propcrly ono for which a
conc~ition~sl u~e pc~rmit is authorize9 by An~hoim Munici.pal Codo Soctiions
18.d$.050.055 ~,nd 18.t17.023.020 t~ wit: permzt ~xp~ns3on ot an existing
convenience market with gasoline sa1Q~ anC witY~ waiver ~f mix~imum numbez~ of
pa.rkin~ spac~rs:
SE~'~I r~ 18,Q~,_Q~q~~22 - ini,mwn Num~r~E P,~rk~.~~pnces,
and ~~48.O~f~i~Q (11 rec~uiced; ~ proposed)
2. Thc~ re~7uested waiver is heroby deniod on the basis that the
parking variax~ce will cause an increase in traific c~ngesL.Iori in the immediate
vicinity and adversely af£ecC adjoining land usas; and that granting of the
, paLkinq variance will be detrimental to th~ peaca, health, s~fety and ganoral
~ welf:~ra of the citizens of ~he City of Anaheim; and f-~xCh~r on the basis tYiat
S~ ~hP petitionex indicated at the public hear.ing ttiat they intend to havR fast
~~ food services and se11 hat fuod iCcsms sucb as hnt dogg, hamburgor~, etc ,
'~ thereby requiring at least 5 more parking spaces, as specif.ied in a Zoning
Code amenclme»t currontly under consideration.
3. That the pruPosed u~o is hereby dor-ied on. the basis that it
would overbuild the s.iCe and is not in kQepinq w.irh the currcnt Comr,~erc:al
Recreatioria2 zonirig.
4. xliar. the size and sliane of the sitt~ proposod for tho use is
not adequate to a11ow the £ulI dsvelopmont of the propoc~ed use in a. manner not
detrimental to tlie partic+~l~r ~rea nor to thQ peace, health, sa£ety 2nd
g~neral wolfnre of th~ Citizens of tho City of Anaheim.
5. That the graYiking of thQ Conditional Use Permzt wi'il be
detrimental ~o the peace, hea:th, safeCy and qeneral welft~re of the Cttizens
nf the City of Anahoim.
6. T}~at the traF£ic qenerated by the proposad uae will impose
an unclue bur.den upon tho s~rPets and highways desiqned and imps•~1ved to carry
the tza~Eic in the area.
7. Thak no one inclicated their presenco at sai.d puhlic ho~ring
in opposft3.ons and ~hat no corraspondencc~ was receivE~i in oppotst~ion to thQ
sub~ect NeL-ii:i.on.
~%.l~~Q-I~~~..~~~iQN1_r1~4~4.U~j~:~__A " F..3~L~?~?Si: That tha Anaheim
City Plt~nninq Commiss~on has reviewed th~ propo3al to permit expansion of an
existinq convenience mazket with gasoline sales and with waiver of mfnimum
numb4r of parking spnces on a irrogularly-shaped parcel r~f land consisting of
approximataly 0.34 acre locat~sd ~t Che northwe3t corner af Ball Road and We~t
5troet haviuq fr~ntages of appr~ximately 136 fee~ on tha n~rth aido ~f Ball
Roa(1 anci 135 feet ~ri the +rest siQe of Warst Str~et and further desc:ribod as
1037 W. Ball Koad (AR~O AM/E~M); and Uoacc haroby apprcve tho Nagatfve
Doclaratiou upon fi.nding that ic: has con3idered r.he roqativa Declorakion
together w.ith any com.TOnt~- recoivad during the pub2ic review procesa and
further finfling un the basis oF the i:-itiul sGudy ana any comments xecoived
that there is n~ ~ubatantial e-vfUar,ce thzt thp project wil: have a
significant effoct o.: thQ ~:~ircinnent.
-~- PCBO••86
. . .. . . . . . t ~ °'`" 145
~
~
~•:, ~ t l,y
~
1~~ 1
~
~ ~
v~i; ~-~Y
+ d
~~
~ ~
.
~ ~~
ff
~
jr!
,. ~~
r~i
; ,»,.
NOW, THGREFORE, BL IT RE50LV~U tlia~ khe AnFiheim City Planninq `~
Cor~issSpn does hereby deny subjech Petition fo~ Conclit3onal Use PQrmi~, on `"
the basio of the aforementioned finding~. "°~'
J,-,
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed a.id approved by me this 2$th
day oE Mar.ch, 1988. ~
--__ / !?W ~~ " Q.~'$'Q'''_._.
CHAIRDiAN, ANAHEIM CTT ~
Y PLANNING COMMISSIQN
ATTEST: _ ~~
~ G
SECRBTARY', d.?IAHETM CITY' PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OI~' CALIFOI2NTA )
COUNTY OF ORANGR ) s~.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
Z, Edith L. Harris, Secrotary oF thE Anahoxm City Plannin,q
Commias.ion, do liereby certify that ~hc~ foreg~ing reaolution was passed n.nd
adoptQd at a me~ting of the Anaheim City Pianning Commissi.on hel~ on
Marrh 28, X988, by ~he follawing vo~e of the mambors thereof:
AYES: CON4riIS~TONERS: BqUAS, BOYDSTGN, CARUSILLO, F~LVHAUC, F~~RBS~,
MC FiURNEY, MCSSE
NOI3S: COMMISSIONERS: NOME
ABSENT: COb4tISSIONFRS: NONG
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto sdL• rny haijd this 28th day
of March, 198a. /
~~ .
^ ~ ~r ~
S~CRETA Y, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNZ G COMMISSION
-3" PCBB-86