PC 88-9/'41li~
~'
i
`i
~
. ~~'. ~d i~. ~ p
~v }~T
~
~ .. ,.. ,t.~i.'.
, i`1
FE~S L T10N N0. NC$f~~,~
A RESOLUTION OF TT3E ANAHEIM CITY PLANNiNU COMMI~SION
THAT PETITION FOR VARIAPICE NQ. ~736 BE GRANTED
~?~ WHEkEA5, the AnahQim City Planning Commiss~an dS.d recoiva 4
''"~ ~~erified Petition for Varia~ice f'rom B~TTY A. WHITFIF.LD, 710 S. Claudina
A~
~~~ 5tre~t, AnaYl2im, CA 928U5, owner and JAMrS N. KAPKO, 703 S. Philadelphia
Street, Anaheim, CA 92Ei05, agent for cerh,ain real prn~erty situatsd iri the
City ~f Anaheim, CounCy ~f 0-ange, SL•ate o{ C~I.iforniz, desaribed as:
LOT 10, :LN SLOCK "C" b~ TRACT 372,"CA.RkOLL
~ SUBDTUISIOPT", CITY OF AIIAFIETM, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
•r ~
~' STATE OF CAI,IFURNIA, AS SHOtiYN ON A MAP FEC012DED TN
,
1~` BOOK 15, PAGE 18 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, F2ECORDS bF
':'~ ORAHGE COUN~'Y, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAF, the City Planning Commission c3id hold a public Y-earing
at the Civic CenLer in the Cik.y of Anaheim nn necember 7, ].987, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of sai.cl public hearing having been c~ulx gaven as requi.red by law and in
accorc',ance wi~h the provisions of the Anaheim bfunicipal Code, Ch~pter ;8.03,
to hear anci consider evidence Eor and agai.nst said proposed vara.~ncc~ and to
inv~stigate and make fir~ding~ and recommendations in connection therewith; anc~
said puk~iic hearing having beeTi continued tu the meering of ~7anuary q, 1988;
an3
WHER~AS, said Commission, after ciue inspQCti~n, investigation
and si;udy made by itself and in its behalE, and after due consideration of all
eviclence ana report~ offered at said hearing, does Pind and determine the
fo11ow9.ng facts:
"
~~
~ 1. That the petitioner proposes waivers of the followi.na to
construc~ a sizigle-family dwell3.ng to rQplace the exzstin
d
lli
,;,
for conversion to a
granny unit: g
we
ng prop~~sed
' (A) ~SE~TIQN 18.2C~Ob3.01p - ?~iinimum_ fron~~a~ ack.
,p
' (25 feet required; 22.2 ~~e~
'• pr~posed.y .
~
~
~ (B) SECTTON 1~~2~~?i~4. -_in.imtlm floar s~~a 2f dwolliiiq uni~.
+
,, ( Z..,~2 2_ u r
5 sa .~.e fee~ required; ~4,~
f ~quarE fee proposed).
j 2. That ~he above-mention~d waivexs are hereby graxiked on the basis
, t.hat there aro special cixr.umstances dpplicable to the property such as size,
s2iape, topoqraphy, locaLian or surround3.ngs, whxch do not apply to oLher
identicallv zoneii properties in the vicinit~~; and tYia` strict application oE the
Zoning Code de.prives ~he ~.ropert}• of privileges enj~yQd by other pro~Qrties in
iclentical zoning cla~sificat.ion in the vi.cinity.
~ ,,,
0158r
:;, -, ,,, .
PC88-05
. . . , . ., '`~
;'i
; "~,
~
~
~
~ ~ 1!,, i M u
, ~ 1~~{~
~;;E;
.
3. ThaL there .re exceptiozial or exCrau.rd:.nar.y circum~ tanc~s or
conclitions applicabl.e to the property .involved or to thP intexided ~~se of the
property that do not apply g~nerally to the prop~rty or class of use in the same
vicinity and zone.
4. ThaL- the requested varianc~ is neaessary for tl:e preservation and
pnjayment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the
same vacznity and zone, and deni.ed ~o the property in quastian.
5. T.hat tYie xe~~uested variance will no'~ be material].y detrimental to
the public wel~are o: injurious to the property or improvements in such v.icinity
anft zone an which the property is located.
G. That no on~i indicatQd their presence at said nublic hearing in
opposiL•io:~; and that no corresporidence was received in opposition to subject
p~tition.
CALTFORNIA _ENVIRQNMENTAI_QUALTTY ACT FINDING: The Plam~ir~g
Director or his authorized representative has del:ermiiied that the proposed
project~ fa11s within the cleFinitian of CaLegorir.al Exemptions, Class 3, as
definecl i.n the State EIR Guidelines and is, tl2erefoze, categurica].~~ exempt
from the requirQment to prepare an EsIh.
NOy;, THEREFOF.~, BE IT. RF50LVED t~at the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby gr~nt subj~ct PeL•iCion f~r Varianc~. up~n the
L-ollowing conditior~s which are hereby EouYid to be a necessary prerEqu3.site to
the proposed u~e of ihe subject proper~y in order ha presQrve tha safety and
aeneral welfax•e of the CiCizer_s of L-he City of Anaheim:
~;
l. That the owrier of subjoct property sha7.1 irrevocably offer to
der_licate to the City of Anaheim a strip ~t land 10 fee~ in width
Erom the cen~c+rlinP oE the alley for alley widening puzposes.
2. Tx.at prior ta issuancA of a buil3ing permik, appropriate park and
recreation in-J.ieu fQes shall be paid to the City oE Anaheim in an
amount as determinerl by the City Council.
3. That prior to issuance of a builtl.ing permit, the appropriate traffac
sig.nal ass~ssmen~ fee shall bP paid to Lkie Cit:y of Anaheim in an
r~mount; as determiiied by the CiLy Council.
4. That the owner of subject proper~y sha~).1 pay to the City of Anaheim
a£ee for street lighting alon,q Philadelphia Street in an amount as
determinE3 hy the City Council.
5. That the owner o~ subject property ~hall pap t:o the Ca.ty of Anaheim
~z fee for Lr~:e planti.ng purposes along Phi :adelphi.a Street in an
amount as detarmir.ed }.iy the Ci~ty Council.
6. That the new construction author.ized by this resolution shall ba
served by underground utililies.
0158r
'~- ~~C88-09
``
, ~,
t.
;r~;.
~:';~
._.>~~~r:~~~ ..
~
c r
7. Tha~ suUjec'c property s;~all be dQVeloped subs~antially in accordance
with plans and specii:ication:+ on filQ witl~ the City ot Anaheim
mark~d Exhibit P7os. 1 chrough 4.
8. That px•ior to issuan~e of a building permit, or within a pariod af
one yr3ar from the ~.late of. thi.s resalution, whir.hever occurs first,
Conclition Nos. 1, :3, 3, 4, and 5, above-m~ntioned, sliala be complied
vrit'h. Extensions for fiirthEr time to complete sa.id conditian5 may
be e~ran.ted irz accnrdance wiL-h Section 18.03.Q90 of the Anaheam
Municio~ll Code.
9. That p:ior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos.
6 and 7, above-men~ioned, shall be complieci wS.th.
10. That approval of this a.pplication ccnstitutes approval of the
proposed reqttest only to ~the extent ~hat it complies with t-he
Anaheim Municin~], Zoning Coae and any other applicable City
regulations~ Apgroval C~OF3S not include any action or ~indings ~s to
comp].ianc~ or approval oP the request regarding ~ny other applicable
ordinance, regulation or requzrement.
BF.; IT L'URTHER RESOLVED t;~at the Anaheim City Planning Commission
do~s hereby find and del:ertt~ine that adopl:inn of this Resolutior~ is expressly
predicated upon ~pplicant.'s compliance wi.th each and a11 ~f the conditions
hereinabove seY. forth. Should any sur.h conditior.s, or arr~r part thereoE, be
decl~r.ed invalid or unenforceable by the fina?. judgmont oE ax~y aourt of
competent jurisdicti~n, then Ciiis Resolui:ion, az~d any approvals h~rein
contai.ned, slaall be deemed nu11 and void.
THE FORI;GOING R~SOLUTIUf1 is si.gne~ and approved by me this ~th day
of Januax•y, 19a8. `
~ ~~ ~ ~~~..
CHATRMAN, ANd~H~IM CIT PLANNIr'G COMMISSTON
ATTEST: l
~ ,._.~ _~ f ,
--~ ~Z~~~ ~ ~_~~~~_4- ~:~-'L'1.G
~ECRETAR , A.NAHEI2d CITY PLANP7ING COMMISSZON
0158z~
-3-
PC88-0~
f ~~i
~
;'r: "+
~~(:
'~.,i
. ~ - ~ ,~~~'~
, ';r
~~~,
~!
''r I
> ~:»
,'~
~~,'
l~
~
,, ~'` ~'r~~o~\r~r~7,"
. . i~'~~~1~
t~1
~ 1!i
i`rN I
~;
~'r
~i;:
~,,^
r'.
STATF OF CALIFORNIA ) ~'
COUNTY O F ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF A,1AI?EIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, SPCrekar~ of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, du `;~'
~ hereby certify that thc foregoing resolution was p~ssea and adopted ~t a
;~:~; meer_zng of the Anaheim City Planning Cummission held on January 4, ].988, by `'~
+^~
::; ~he z~ll owing vote of Che members tliereof:
AXES: CQM'~IISSIONERS: BOUAS, BOXDSTUN, CARUSILLU, FELDHAUS, IiERRST,
MC HURNEY, MESS~ ~~
';r.
NGES: COhIIvlISSION~RS: NONE ';;,
~a ABSENT: COMMISSIUNERS: NONE ':•M
~
~ ,~
{
{
'
r IN WTTNESS WHE REOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of ~
'
`,,: Janu~ry, 1988.
~
~
~
~.,~ ~ ~~~~
~~~' C
- -- -
, SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CQMMISSION ,
:~;
;
;;i
7iiyJ
,
~'r' ~,; . ~
r~~ r
~~.x~ry~",. 1 ~ ':. ~. ~
varaav
U158r
_,~ _
PC88-09 _.:.... ~;°.i