PC 88-97;;•.
~ ~
!~Y'
' 1~.
i. .,
.,
~fnlf~Yl
_ , . . , , , . . .. . , ~n,{_•i ~ ' ~ ~lt~ ~i~'° .^~~~ry
~ _ i{~ ti~l ~~~1 {
~ . ~ . . ' i ~..f,
~ ~,~1
.' . . . ..,~,
1~ ~
~~ts~37~~~rs..= ~r3t.sC~,ZL .. . .: ,i
A RESOLUTTON OF THE ANAHETM CITY PL)~iNING COMMISSrON
THAT PETTTIUN FOR VA??iANCc', N0. 3777 BE GRANTED, IN PART
WHEREAS, the Anaheim CiL•y Planninc~ Commission did receive s~
verafisd Yetitio
P
V ~~~
n
or
ariance from DR. R.S. MINNICK and JAN W. MINNICK, 122G9
Sky Lane, Los AngelQS, CA 90049 '~'~:
, owner, of certain real property situated in
the City af Anaheim, Caunty ox Orange, State of Calif
i ;`' ~;~
'`~
oxn
a describod as; '~,,x
'.fHB WE5~ 118.71 F~;ET OF xHE NORTH 7.88.00 FEET qF TIiE ;';'`~
'~'~
NORxHEAST QUARTEk OF T.HE NORTY•,'WEST QUARTER OF SECTION I~°
'
3, TOWNSHIP 4 SOU1'H, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCFIO S.AlT , ;
~i
:
JUAN CAJON DE S~N;CA ANA, PARxI~Y IN THF CI',fY OF ~
'
ANAHEIM, PARTLY IN THE C1TY OF FULLERTON, ALL IN THE '•`i~
COUNTY OT' ORAtvGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PF.R MAP '''~I
RECORDEA IrT BOOK 51 PAGE 10 QF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, TN ~'~~
THE qFFlCE OF TFiE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. "'F
WHEREAS, tho City Plan.ni.ng Commi~sion did ho~d a public hearinq
at the Ci
vic Cent
i ~;~
~,~~
.
er
n the City of Analieim on A~iril 11, 1988, at 1:30 p.m.,
no~ice of said public hearing having been duly q.iven as re
uir
d b
~~
q
o
y law and in
accor~anr,Q with the ~,rovisions r~f• the Axiahei.m Municipal Code, Chapter 18
0~ '
~~
;~,i;
.
,
to hesr ancl consider evidence for and against said proposod variance and to
invpsti
ate a
d
k
i '~`,:;
g
n
ma
e f
ndinys and rocommendations in cennaction therowith; and '``''~
WHEREAS, said Commission, afrer due inspection, investigation ,~~!~
xnd studX made by itsPlf and in its Y,eh~lf, and aftor due consideration nE a11
evid ~~(
anc~ and reports offered at said hoaring, does £.ind and determinc~ tre
fullowing £acts: ~'1,~;;
~~:
,,
1. That the peti*;ioner proposes waiver of the following to
construct a commercial bui7.ding: ~'`
;1
,SE~IQN~1~.04.08Q•02p - Rgquf.red Improvemen Q~~_ht-of_W~
X. 'i
,
and 18.44.100 (Payme~it of costs for uEE-aite
improvements r~quired; none propased)
2. That tho req~,~estod wai.ver i~ hereb
the applicant being requared t
r
r
~
W `
~
o pay fo.: tlie .fallowing
i pravemonts
o
f
the
right-of.-way, not ta excaea a tuCal of $35,4UO.GOs '
;f
;
i
1. Remove/construcL curb & qutter $ 2,538 ~;:
;,~~
2. Remove/oonsCrucC drive ap~raach $ 2,850 `'~`
3. Romove/construct: sidewalk ~ ~
p~~ =~~~
~
~
4. Remove/construct catch basfn
$ 6
000 r
' ~~
,
5. ~U~ of rhe cost for relocating ,1~
traffac signa? ~10,00Q
6. Stractural placament oF street ~~,3,p 'sr
7. 10~ Engineering fee $ 3,783 ''
II. 1A~ con~ingency ~ 3.783 `f
''i
..
'"OTAL (NOT TO EX~EED)----____.._____ ~35,400 =~
-,
_...._.
'~
0254r
PCH8-97 ~i~
y "i~:. ~ .. . . ,
~ ~ . ;;
:`i
. .. .. :.l,.~u~
~ a.~[Yl 'Y'.N i7 W
~
~
3. T.hat the above-me.nti.oned waivor is heroby gran~ed on the
basis that the costs of the raquirecl l.mprovements are proportionate],y lii~h
relative to the value oE the proposed commercial bui.lding, az~d. tnat there are
special circw~~stances applicable to tho property suck~ as ~izo, shape,
~opography, location and surroundings wliich do not agply to other identically
zaned praperty in the ;ame vicxnity; and thaC strict application oE t~he 2oning
Code deprivas the pr~perty af privileges onjoyec~ by other prapertiRS in the
identical zone and classification in the vicinity.
4. That therQ are ox.ceptional or extraordinary circumstances
or conditions applica~ile to the ~roperty involved ar to the intended use of
the property that do not apply genorally to the propert;~ or class o:E use in
thA same vicinity and zone.
5. That the requested variance is n~cessary for the
praservation and enjoym~nt oE a substantial px•oparty righ~ possessed by other
pz~~perty in the :ame vicinity and zone, and denied to the rroperty in question.
6. That the requested variance will iiot be mat~rially
detrimertal ~a the public welfare or injurious to thQ praper+cy or improvements
in such ~•icini.ty and zone in which the property is located,
7. Zhat no onR indicated thQir presence at saici pub~ic hearinq
iu opposition; and that no correspandence was r.eceived in cpposition to
subjec:t petitian.
~A~FORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL~~LITY ACT FIND1~: That the, Anal-.eim
Cil-y l~lanning Commission ha~ raviewRd the prapo~s~l to cona;:ract a commarcia?.
building with waiver ~f r~quired improvemQnL- oP right-cf--way on a
roctangularSy-shaped parcel of land coi-sisting of approximately 0.43 acre
locatod at the southQast corner c,f Oranqethurpe Avenue and L~emon sicreet
having appro~imata frontages o.E .14U Eeet on the sauth side og QranqQthor~e
Avenuo and 135 fest on tho eaat s3de of Lemon StreQt; and duos hareby ~pprove
the Negative Declaratiun upon L•inding tha~ it has considerer3 the Negative
lleclaratlon together with ranl comments received during the public review
pracess and furthQr Eindi.ng on thQ basis ai: t~he initial study and a~ny
comments reaeived tha~ there is n~ substantial evidence that the project will
have a significarlt effect on the enviranment.
NOW, THERBFORC, BE IT RGS~LVED that the I~naheim City Planning
L.
"; Commission does tiereby grant subjQCL• Petition for VariancQ, upon the
k following condi.~ions which are heraby faund ko t~o a necessaxy prerequisite to
~ the propo~ed use of Y.ho sulyject property~ in order to presorve tne ~afety and
gener~.l welEare of the Citi.zens af t2ie City of Anaheim:
1. That priar to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate
traf~ic signal assessmen~ fpo shall be paid ta the City of
Anaheim ~.n an a~nounC as datermined by Cho City ~ouncil.
t Ktt,'1
~ . ~ . ,~1'~~i
~ ~:
.
~`~~~
'~%
-2-
~COS-97
,~'+~
;
~~~
_ . ~~~
F~.
.i . ~
. ,
~ ~~ . . .. ~ ~ , . . .
. . . . , . . . . , : ~ .~ . .
. ' . ~ y~
R' I ti~Yt~
_"'' ,~
i~
~~._ • '
~ .
~ ~ . . .
~ ~
/}.
~~I~
~ ~
~ . . ~ . ~ . ~
r.~~
1~'.
~ 2. That the ownez~ of subjer.~ hroperty sha11 irrQVOCably ofEer to ~'~
~ dedicate to thn City of Anaheim a strip oE land 60 feet in °;~!:;
~ width from Lhe centerline of the street along Orangethorpe '3
~ X~venue for street widening purposes. :;
.
y +
~
;
"s.
That the owner cC subject proporty shal]. pay to the Ci~.y of
'';?
Anaheixr a fee for tree g].an~ing purposes along T.,eman S~reeL and 'w
Orange~thor.pe Avonue in an amount as dotermined by thP City
F' Council . ;:~
ii ~> `
;; 4o That the existi.ng most northerly driveway on I,emon ~treet and. ~.,'.~
most w~sterly driveway on Oran.gethorpe AvenuQ shall be removed ;i;
and replaced with a stanclard curb, gutt~r, si~ewalk and "i
'
landscapin,q. ~
r: f
;~,
~
i 5. That all driveways sha17. be reconstructed to accommod3te ten '`;
,
ra,
(10) fooL radius curb reL-urns. Existing broken or cracked
?; driveways shall be r9moved and replacefl as required by the City
~ Er.gzneer. "~;
'~:>
!~ 6. Th4t drainage af c~ibjact property shall be disposed of in a ;"~.f
'1 manner sati3factory to th~ ~ity Engine~r~ ,
`
;;{
~,' ,
~ 7. Tr.at a right oE en~ry shall be g•rantiQd to pexmit the City o~ r:`:i
'"
i Fullerr_on to enter on the prop~rty to widPn Lemon Street. ~~~+
' ~i,
ti 8. That subject propartl shall be serv~d by ~xnderground utilities. `
:;~
k
T ,
~
f
"'
~,; 9. That trash atora e areas sh~ll be
g prr~vided and maintainad in '
;~
~
~~~ accordance wir_h approved vlans on file witYi the Street ?i
~~
Mainter.anco and Sanitation Aivision. >,~.~~;
r„
~V
''
~~
10~
That all air ~•onditionang facilities (and other roof and ground
,'.~:
`~~
r mcunted equipment) shall be properly shislded itrQm view. ,;~~:
.
,j~ ,,,!;;,
~~ 11. That the proposal shall comply w3.th a'll signing requirt~ments ot `';}
~:.
tkie CL Zoxte, unJ.ess a varianae allowing sigr, rraivers is : ;:;;r~
:r approved by the Ci4y Council, Planning Commission or Zoning ~~~
:,
~, l~dministrator. ,r~
12. That subject proparry sh~ll be clevelopQd substantially in ~;`%
x.ccordance ait•h plans ~nd sp~ca.rications an file with t2to City
of Anaheim marked Ex2iibit No. 1.
;,r
13. That prior to issuance of a building permit, or within ~ period ;~
o~ ono year fram the da~e of this decision, whichevec nGCUrs
first, Condi~ion Nos. l, 2, 3 and 7, above-mentioned, s.hall be ,;;;~;~
complied wi~h. Extensions for Eu:~her time to complete said ,`~
conditions may be yrantoel in accorclance w~ith Section 1g.03.Og0 'Y~
of, the Anaheim Municzpal Coda. -`?,~;
. r,
14. That prior to £inal buildinq and zoning inspections, Condition ''''
~;
Nos. 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 12 abov~-mon~ianed, shall bo !'~~~J'',
Vf' ' h
cqmplied wit:~. ,^~,
,, .
, _ .~
}~:_
,~ `' i
~
:'
~ ~ ~,,-~~
r.~ ~'
;~'` -3- PC88-97 `„~j
^; ~,~~
a ~
~, ,
~~ ~~
3
_ _.._ .. _ _. , ,.;:-~ s,1~-i~
'~~
~~
. . ., _.. . q~yr~;~,~
. . . . . . . ... ~ .. . i~ t ~ y ~ 1 ~;C~f7?i~.F6
8
Yi
.
~ ~n~ , ~
~~ ;
t
~.~~
'•;jH ~~ 1
Y
i
.
. , . .
. . . . 1t
~t
~'~ T
~
;{ii~
.
K {tF
15. That, approva.l of ~h3s appliaation constitutes approval of the ~ li
r`
proponed regue~t only to the extent that it complies with the ''~
AuahQim Municipal Zoning Code and any other 3pplicable City ~i
rpgulations. Approval d0@y not inc].ude any action or findings "
as to compJ.iance or approval of. the request regarding any other "";
~-pplicabl~ ordir.ance, regulation or roquirement. ;';;
,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that khe F~nalieim City Planxiing Commission ~~
does hc~re~y Eand and deCermine that a~Aption of this Resolution is expressly ;~::i'
predicated upon appli.;ant's compliance with each and a13. af the conditions ;;i
hareinabove set forth. Should any such conditions~ or any part thereof, be ;
~
declared invalid or. unenforceable by ~he final judgmenk of an~r aourt oE ,
,,'~
;'
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein~ ,
`~'~
conY.ained, shall be deemed null a.zd void. ~~'
i
mHE FOREGOIN~ R~S4Lt1TI~N is signed and approved by ma khis 1].th day ~.
~~
':'t~
of ~pril, 1988. i ,~
~ t
4~~ s~~
. _
CHAIRMAN. AIvAHEI CTTY' PLANN'I.dG COMMISSIOIT
~-.i
ATTBST: . `/ ' ~I
~
~,~f
'-~.
~ '~a
_. -
SECRET~fiY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COt~hiISaIQN ~r:'f',
.~
:a
i_:i;
STb'rE OF CALIFORNIA ) '.':'~~
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. ~ ~~:'.~:;`'~;
CZTY OF AI~lAF3FIhi ) ~~ ~~';'`:?'~;
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City P1annS.ng ~
Commission, do hareby certify that the toregoing resolut.ioii was passed an8
adopt~d at a moeting of the AnahQim Cit~ Plarlning Commission held on
April 11, 1988, by tho £o1l.owing vote of the mt~mbers thereo£: ;~
AYE~: COMMISS.LONERS: BOI7AS, BGYD$TUN, CARUSZL~O, FELAHAUS~ h~RRST, ~°''
MC F3LiRNEY, ME;SSF
NOES: COMMISSTdNERS: NONF
; •;,
ABSLNT: COMMISSTONERS: NONF ~.
IN WTTPtESS WHEREOr, I hava hQreunto set my ha.nd this llth day o~
April, 1988.
,
c~ ,~ ~ ~
s~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLllNNING C02rIIrIISS70N
"`~` PC88-97
;, r ; .~
~. ~
r,c.
%:
_._. .._::x:
~,~3
,; ~t
~i,~:
`~}r
~~i~,;
-;,.,~,,
~, ~ r
;:r~
~J~•~
;~' t
: i ~ , ~ a-;~,:r~r: