PC 88-98
.
H~sc ~rr r~o. pcs: -9a
~
~
A RESOLiJTION OF T ',nHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMTSSTON `
~'
T.HAT PETITION ~OR COtdDITIUi USE PERMIT NA. 2985 HE GFtA2dTED, ~N rART ~
~'
WHEREAS, the Analioim t Plannin Commission
Y g did rac~ive a verifie~ ~1
I<
Perition for Conditi.onal Use ~rmit from EAST ~1NAHEIM EN'PERpEtIS~S and SAMUEL ~~~
d?
A~ HARAI~G~, 2100 Howell Ave .e, Sui~e 109, Anaheim,
CA 92807, ATT~i: Fred ,
;"'i
Seligman, owner and JrTZRY and CONNIG CALIENDO, 465 S. Pasao Bandexa, Anaheim,
CA 92807 , agent for certain real property situated i n the City o£ Anaheim,
County of Orange, Sta~e of Californza, described as: .!;~;,
~:.
~
i;,~
PARCET~ Z~ AS SHOWN ON A M~P FILED IN BOOK °L04, PAGES "'I
~5 AND 46 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE QFFICE OF THE COUNTY ~~
. +I
RECORDER OF' ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ,Q]
WHEREAS, the City PlaniYing Commissior~ did r,old a public hearing at ~
the Civic Center in the CiL-y of Anr,heim or Apri1 11, 1988 at 1:30 p.m., no::ice ~
of ,aid public hearing having been duly givon as required icy law and in ~
accordance with the provisions o£ the ~nahezm Municipal Code, Chapter 18.U3, 'i~
~o hsar and conside: evidenc~ for and a~ainst said proposed condit3.ona]. use
permit and to investigate and make findiags and recommendations in cannec~icn `~
therewith; anci ?
WH~REAS, said Comm3.ssion, after due inspection, investigai:ion and
study madQ by iCself and in its beha].f, and after due considerarion of all
ovidpnce and reports offered at said hearing, daes find and detgrrnine the
followizi~ £acts:
1. ~rat r.he proposAd use is properly ons for vrhich a conditianal
use pormit is authorized by A.naheirn Municipal Code SQCtion 18.61.05Q.611 to
wit: to permit a r~st~urant with on-sale alcohol wi~h tha following waiver:
E,~f'TIQNS 1$.Q4.050,021 - M~nimum numbe~ ~f ~,arki~
:1~s.4.~.~.~?? ~P~€~. •
18•af~,.Q,5QQ231 (452 required: ~, Pr'oposed?
.I~,._06. 050. 031
1~E •O6•O80
antl ~~~;.4~.~~Q.
2. That the parking waivc•r will nnt cause an increaae in tra£fic
congestion in ~hQ immeciiate vicinity nor adversely atfect any adjoinin~ land
use3 aazd granting af the parking waivar under tha conditions imposed, if any, :;f
will not be detrimental to the peace, he~lth, safety and gener,al welt~re of
the citizens of, the CiLy o£ Anaheim.
3. That the proposed use will not adversal~ affecL• the adjuiniag
land uses and the grawth and developmenr r~f ~ho araa in which it is proposed '`
ta be lr~cated. ,
,~
0256r PCaB-96 ;,
~
i
C. _
1 ~
f. ~ :.;i . ... .:.~r~.~~;~, .,.... . ... ~.. . . , , , .
;'~
~ ~ . . , _.. v~~!
. . .. . . . ~ . . . . - } ~' y^ }F~~~~
. . . . . . ~ . ~~, ~~~~
~ ~ ~ . . ~ i .,.~ I
r
~~i
r`~
4. That the proposed use is hereby gxa~ted, in part, subj~ct to ~he `'':~~i
restriction that there sha11 be no sa].e of beer, wir~e or alcohnl whatsoever. `'~~
5. That whe size and shape of hhe si~e proposed Eor tche use is
adequate to allow th~ tull develapment oF the proposed u~e in a manner not :~
detrir er_tal r.o the particular area nor to the peace, b•ealth, safety and °y
gQneral welfare o£ the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. '=~
6. That the c~ranting of tY,e Conditional Use P~rmit under the
canclitions impasect •aill no~. be detrimental to the p~ace. ~ealth, safety and
general wel~are of the Ci~izons of the City of Anaheim. ,~
~
7. That the txaffic generated by tals prop~sed use will no~ impose ~
an undue burden upo,n. the stre~:ts and highways designed and improvad ta aa•rry ;
tlie traffic in ~he area. ~
8. That one gerso~n indicatad their Fresen~e at said ~ublic hearing
in opposition; and that no cor.respondence was received in op~os~~9on to the
subjec~ petiLion,
CALIFQRNI~ ~t~QNNENTAL OUALITY ACT FIhDING: That the Anaheim
City PYanning Commission ha:a reviewea the proposa~ ta permit an 1800 square
foot• r.estaurant ;including on-•s~le alcUhol) with waiver Q~ minirnum n~bE'" of
par~ix~g spaces on an irregularly-shaped parcel of ~and consistln5 of ~`'
approximately 6.3 aares, having a frc,ntaga o~ approximate.l~• 402 feet on tho '`''~
~outh side ~f La Palma Avenue, and being 1.ocate3 immediately east of the "~~
c~nterline of the southerly terminus oE Kaa.logg Dxive and Eurthor described '~
as 5I.20 ~ast La Palma Avenue; and does hereby approve the Negat.ivo "';
Declaratiori upc~n finding ~ha~ it has considc~rAd the Negati~-e Declarati~n
together with any comments re~~eivRd during the public rev5.ew process and .`.'~';.;
further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments rece5yed
that there is no substantxal evidence tha~ the project wi11 have ~ ~,';;
signiiicant sffe~t nn the envircnment..
NOW, xg~REI'ORE, g~ IT R~SO'LVED th~t the Anaheim C~.ty Flanning
Commission does hereby grant subj~ct Petitaon for Conditional Use Permi~,
upon the followzng conditions wk~icti are heroby found to be a necessary '1`
preroguisite ~o the propased usc~ of the subject ~roperty in order to px'esorve `:'.~
the safety and gQneral welfare o;~ i:Fie Citizens oi ttie City of Anaheim: '.;t
1. That prior to issuance oP a building permit, a txatfic signal ?`~;;
assa~smQnt foe equaZing the differencQ between t~g industrial ~`
ar.d commercial assassment fees sha11 be paid to ti~e City og ~`;;~~,
Anaheim in an amount as dEtermined by tha City Council. .!x,
2• That trasl~ St~rage areas shall be providQ~ ~r•ci r. aznt.aii~ed in
accordanr? with approved plans on fil.e with ths c~treet
tdazntananc~ and Sanitatic~n DYVision.
3. That a7.1 air condit9.onxng fac.:Iiti9s and other roof anc'i ground
mounted equipment sha11 3~e properly shielded £rom viQ~w.
,,;,F;
_,.,'~
;~s:a
' ;'+.,<_:
._2- PC88-4A ~~`,,`•'~?
r
;~
. `,; j';;~~
:~
_ .._._,:,.,.,.. _ :.. ,., , . _ , n 1~
e;~tj3~',,~;+fUd~d~~n,-~~C~ j.i~.G;{~ i..~itirl.:i i yJ;F~~`ii ~i ~ Ii:; 'y-';~i"~v`~d5 ~..~~'nf~ . itl'..~ci7y~.;¢~..;~ ,:.i~..:f . .. . . . :'.^~ ~ -.~i~: f.r i v ~1 ~ ~
a. . . ~ .. - ~~7iR1`k ~d~~~."Q''`r
}` r . . , • - ~ i,~i +r~t
'i~ ',~ . .' ~ - a
tt.'~ ' , ~ ~ .
4. That thd proposal shal~ comply with. a11 3igning rQquirements of
the ML(SC) Zone, unless a variance allowing sign waivers is
approved by the City Counci?, Planning Commission or Zoning
; Admi':..istrator.
5. Tha~ subject properr.y shall be develop~d ~ubstantially in
?r.r,~rdance with plans and specifications on file with the City
of Anaheim mar)sed Exhibit Nos. 1 through 3.
f, That prior to tho issuance of a building permiL-, or prior to
t~a commencemen~ of tht~ activity authoxized by this rosolukion,
or within a period of one yea.z ~rom the da~e of this
resoliation, whichever oc;curs fir:;t, Condi~ion No. l,
above-mentioned, sh~ll be com~lied with. Extensions for
further ~ime to complete said conditions may be grar_ted in
accorclance with Sectz~n 18.03.d90 of the t~naheim Municipal Code.
7. That prior to the commencemc~nt of' the activity autborize~ by
this resolution, or fiizal huilding and zoning inspections
whichever occurs L-irst, Condi*_ion Nos. 2, 3 ~,nd 5,
above_mentioned, sha].1 be complied with.
g. That approval of this ~pplication cnn5titutas aQproval of t:he
proposed request on'ly to the axten~ L•hat it c;omp:ltes with the
AnahNim Municipal Zoning Code and any other apnliaable City
regulations. Apprnval doe~ not inalude any a.;;tion or findings
as to compliance or approval of the request regarcizng any o~h~r
applicable ordinan~e, re~ulatzon or raquir.emen~.
g. That there shall be no nn-•sale of beer and wine or other
alcoho?ic beversges in connec~ion w.ith subjec~ re~taura~t.
BE I~ FURTAER RESO~VF;D that the A;~alaeim City I'lanning Commission
does hereby find and determine that ~doption o~ thi^, Resolutiori is expressly
predicated upon a~,plicant's compliance wi~k~ e~ch and a11 of th~ co~ditions
hereinabot~e set forth. Should any such ~unditi.ons, or any part thereof, bE
declared invalid or unen~orceablg '~y the f.inal judgment of ~ny aourt of
c;ompatent jurisdiction, then t:i:s Resolu*i.on, and axiy agprovals hr.rein
contained, sh~11 be deemsd niilJ, and void.
"' THE FOR~,GOING REaOLU~~p~T is si nea and approved by me this llth 3ay r~
~ of April, 198~. ~ ~ x.i
~ ~- ~ ~!
- __L______
CH,AIRM,AN. AN'AI3EIM CITY LANNING COhII~SIS~IOIJ `:~;~.
~ ~,
'~ ATTEST:
' ' ~~ --
~~ ' _ - . ;
ti~, SE~RE~'A.kY~ANAH~IDi CITY PI,AIdNING COMMISSiON ;'~~
~::
r> - ;i.
~'+~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~''
k.:, _ •.~
~t
; ,°
~ '~ ~ -3- PC88-98 ~ ~ ~~~-
s~-: ~ ~~
h ;at
~; i~
ff~ r.,~ ' ~ ~ ~ '~, i~
x r~ ~ +'.
a~r'Y ;f
,
,, . , , ,, ~, ,
~i+~ ~ . . `~ ~ . . .. I t,~ ~I~~)~t ~L~A'4{~1YS1~~'Y~~ltA1(~yp,~y;u~ .
~
'
'
y ` . , , ' ~
~ . . ' ~ f ~~~ ~ y f
~!;~k-f
rQ~
fi
. r
J
°
~
r
.
- . . . . . ' _ , f, . ~
~~
40
y
n
. . . . , 411
7)
~~t~,t
~
~r
l
~ ~t~1
ti4
y<I
'r~~
5 ?iRQ
~
; r
_ ~ ~:
~ ~
~ ST~.TE OF CALIFORNIA ) „~.~~~~
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. ,;"~~
'
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) s~~
,~2
`
T, Edith L. Harris, Soc::etary of the .~iahRim C:ity Plauning ,;r.:
;;:_~;~
rT'
Y Commission, do hQreby certifv that~ the foregoing rssolution aas passed and' .,;~
~ adeptod at a meeting of the An~hezm City P~.anning Commission held on `~~
~ April 11, 1988, by tha following votg of the mombers thereof: '~
, ~~~i a
:;:~
j AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, CARUSILLO, FELDHAUS, HERis5`r, ~3
? MC BURNEY, MESSE '~
NOES : COMMISSI~JNERS: NONE ~~
,; ~~.
h ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: NONE '~'~~h
~
s
' IN WITNESS WHERFOF, I have hereunto set my Fiand this ].lth day nf sr
:~
~~
April, 1988. ±~a
;~
~~ ~ / ' '~
E~
~
r~ ~ _ ~e. .~ ~•,,
~,~ SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLP.NNING COMMIS53~ON :~
; ~
~r
~;' '~~
~ :-s:
"
-{
:;~' r
~~a i
f~r
'
i•,
~ . C
. ~.'~r
i~ ;^~
' ~
`
'.`' ;
v~~
.,
~ iyC~
~
,j A~
~K~ . . ~•il~'~3
. r;;~
'i
i~
~ '
z
r
xi o
r-~
1~
1'y
+ I~
h•~ ~L
~ ~'~~
7.~~~
~;.. ~ .
~
'
;.11
..
i.
i . . .
~, .
~'~ f~^
,
~ r ~r~
,~
.
). .. ,
t~
4
A
f.~ ~
}
~i
{
~~ ~ }.} .
ti
t
'
:
~,
3 ~ ~
K
~ t
:~
r ; ,
.
~,
~ ijya
~ ~
`~11`
~ ~~' ~ . ~
. . . {t~{~
~7)~
~`
?^
~~ /' `
~
t~
.. ,
. .:,_, . . . .
~
. . . . . . . . . _ . . ..
. .. .. .. .:. ' ~~
~) _
~~s• ,
~'~,
~
~
~ ~I
~
~ •
-4- PC88-98 '
~
~
'
.
„ ,r
' k,.
~r,
s
~
,,~
~ •
~
~
~ ~~
„E
, 4;~
,
f
~
~ . . . . ' . . .
.
;% t I ~; ~} ~Y` %
. i '
~ 1
~ ~:
.,_ ~ . . . . . . .
'
' .. . ~ . . ' . . . . . . .
~
'tt f
, ':
~
'..,:~... ~_.....~av. ,
._ ..~.._ ._,..: , ,,,.,,..,.~, ~~:.,_,. . , .. ,.
u .... . ...... . . ... . _ _ __ ~
~
4
, , ., i. 1 .