Resolution-PC 89-1~~"~
S~ 41. I N~.~...~'.$~-U 1
A RESOLiJTION OI' THE ANhHEIN( CITY PLANNIN'G COMDIISSTON
TfIAT PETTTION FOR RE(:L~.SSIFICATTpN Nq. fS8-E9-24 BE GRAN7.'ED
WHEkEAS, the Anatieim Ci~y Flannin~ Commission iiia rec~ivR a
v~~~r:ifiad petitioii fnr Roclass.ification irom FIarold C. J. Caykendall, 2890 E.
La PA1mts, ~.naheim, CA 92006, owner, arid AndrQw Hom~s, 4~00 MacArtt~ur
Tioulavard, fR900, Newport Ee~ch, CA ~266U, agent, af cprtain real property
s.ii:uatc~~i a.n Zhe CxhX of Anaheim, Count;y o~ Orange, S~ate <~f Calif~rnia,
describQd as follows:
LOTS 9 ANn :LO OF TRACT N0. 255, EAST AN'AHEIM
SU~3DIVISION, IN THE CITY 0~' ANF-IiE7M, COUNTY pF
ORANGE, STATE OF CAL'IFURNI'A, AS PER MAF RECURDED IN
BOOK ld, YAGE 25, 0~ MIS(;ELL7~NEOUS MAPS, IN TH~
OFF'ICE OF THE C~Ut7TY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WFiEREAS, the Ci.t.y Planning Comm~ssion did hold a public hearing
at tkie Civic Cer~ter in the Ci~;.y of Anaheim ~n Docember 5, 19Af~, at• '1:30 p,m. ~
; not3ce of said p~ablic h~aring lidving been dul.y givon as require~3 by law and in
accord3nce with thg provisior-~r of the Anaheim 1~unir.ipal Codo, Chap~er 1fi.03,
to )zear and consider evidence for and against said propospr3 •recla~sificatiot~
and to inv~stigate and mRke findings and recommendations in cunnection
~herewiL•h; and said public hear5.ng was contiiiu~ad to ~he meetir~g of January 4,
1989; x~nd
~ ;:;{1e.~
ij;f:l
!r; ;
WHEc2EAS, s.~id Cammission, after due inspecti.on, investigation
arid st_~tdy made by its~J E and in its behalf, ~r~.~ aftar due considaration of ail
evi~9once and reports o.ff.ered ~t said h~aring, d~ES .find and detaxmine the
following ~a~~s;
~.. That the petitioner ~XGYO;R@3 recl.assification ~f subject
property from the RS-7200 (Residential, Sin~lo-Fami].y) T.one to the RMr12U0
(Resider~Ci~l, Multzple-Family) or a less intei,~e zone.
Z. That the AnahUim GQneral Plan closzgnates sub.ject pro~erty ~
for mediwn density residentia~l land usos.
i
necessary and/or desi abl.eo orz~~thed c derly zand~.~iro er subjec~ pro ert is
community, P P devQlopment p of y~he
4• That the rro~osc~d roclassificatic~n ~f subject property 8oes
pr~~eriy relate to the zonas ancl their perm:tted uses locally established in
close pr.oximity to subjec~ proparty and to the zones and thei= per~~~itted uaes
generall,y established throughc~ut the community.
5. That h.he propo3ed reclas:sificarion of subject propertl
requ.ires the dedicat:ion dnd improvQmpnt of abuttir.g ~ trec+ts in ~accordnnce with
th~ Circu.lat.ion Flemeiit of the General P~an, due to the ~ntfcipated ~ncrease
in trnf.xic rrhirh will be gQnerated bx the int~nsification of lsnd use.
060]. r
-1- PC il~_pl
- - - - _ , _ -- - ~:~
-Y`''~~~1
6. That t~•ro person~ indicat~ci thQir presence at said ~ublic
hearing in opposition; and that nu carrespondonce wns received in op~osiLion
to subjeCt peCiti~n.
(:AI,I~;~f~N~,1~ E 1~Vr~NMGNTJ~L~jjA~TY~T__~.~:ND~N~,: That thQ Aa~he.im
City Flanning Comm~.ssion has reviewed tt~e pro~osal to reclt~ssi.fy subject
property from the Tt5-7200 (Residential, Multaple-Familp) Zon~ to t2io RM•-1200
(Resldoritia7., Mult:iple-Family) Zor-e and ~o cozistiruct a 3-story, 20-unit
"afL•ordable" apartrnont bui].ding with waivers oE minimum buil.ding site area
per dwelling unit and maxi,~um structural hoight on a z~rctangularly-sh~sped
parcel of 2~rid c:on,isCing of approximately 0.53 o.cre, having a frontage of
~-nproximately 120 Leet on the ~asL sido of Cotfman Str~et, having a maximun
aepth oE appruximately 189 feet, being locat~d approximaL-ely ~190 f~eC north
of L•he center.line o~' CenCer Strec~t and further described as 206 North CoEfman
SLrQet; and doea hQreby ~pprove the Nagative Declaration upon findzng that it
Y:~s cons.idered the ~TegaL-ive Dec:larati.on together wiCh any commAnta receivod
during the public review proceas ar_d further Einding on the basis of the
initial study ar,d any commer,ts received that thoro is na subst~nti~l evidence
that th~ project will have a siqnif:ir.ant effect on the en~•ironment.
NOW, TIiCREFORE, B~ TT RESOLVED t2iat the Anaheirn Ciky Planriinq
Conunission daes hereby grAnt st~bject Petition for Reclnssification ancc, by so
duing, L•haL• 7:itle 18-Zoning of the Anahexm Municipal Code bQ ameride3 to
exclude thP above-described property from the I2S-7200 (Resitlantiat,
Single-Famzly) 2ono and ro incorporatR said desarib~~i ~roperty into the
RM-120f? (i:esidential, Mu~tip'ls-F~mi1y) Zone v.pon tnr~ following condition~
wliich are hereby found to be a nec.esssry prerequisit~r to the proposed use of
subjacL• property in ard~r to preserve Lhe safety and general w~Ifare of the
i;itizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. Thak streeY. li.ghtiiig facilitics along C~~ffn,an Str.•eet shal.l be installad as
requirad by the Util:i.ti~ss Goneral ttanager in accordance with
specif.ic~kions on f.i le in ?;he Office o1: Utili~ic~s General Manager; or that
security in the form of a bond, cart5.ficate vE depnsit, letter of crodit,
or casb., in an amount und form sar.isfactory tr~ the C.ity of 1~naheirn, shnl.l
be posted wit2i the City to guaran~e,e the sf~tisfactory coml~letion of tha
above-mentioned improvomr:nts. Said ~jecurity sha?1 be pnsteci with the City
of Aixahcir~i prior to inr_roductio:~ of ar~ ordinance reaoni.ng subjQC~
progerty. Th~ above-r~~c~i~irod irnprovomr,nt, shall be ?.nstalled p:ior to
occupancy.
2. That the lc~gal ownQr o~ subj~sc~
doclicato to the C.ity Uf Anahoim a
width from the center?.ine oE !;he
widoning uurpos~s.
prope:rty shall irrevocably offer Co
sCrip of land thirty two (32) f.eet in
street; alang Cof£man Stre~t f.or str.eeY.
3. That a faithful p~~rFormanco bond zn a:~ amount approved by the C3.L-y
Engineer sk~all be posted witl: the City of Anah~im prior to introdaction of
thQ ordinance rezoninq subject ~~roparty ko guarantee the removal oE
existinq sL~Qet improvements alonq Coffman Str~et and
reconstructioi:/~or.sf:ructfon of full strest impruvemants at the all•imat~
location when +-equired by Ctse City Engin.eer.
~~
~~~.~
;;ti.
.~.
;'.
•,~:
.;
,'
-~- PC 89-O1
~/~
~ ~~=s~µ ; `t
~ ;;;
4• That a feQ sliall be paid to the City of An~hc~im £~z tree planting
alony C~a.ffman Street in an arnov.nt a~ ~stablished by City Council
resolution.
5. 'fhat pzior to inCroducti~r. of ari ordinar.co razoning subject property,
lhe .legal properL•y ownQr shall prepare and recarc~ an unsubo.rdznat9d
covenanL• lim:Eting occupancy o~ each aparLmont unit to no more than
two ( 2) persons (other ttian childr~n unc7er the ag@ of two ( 2) year~ )
per bedroom. Said limiratzon shall be inclu~9s<. in each leasQ/renkal
actr.eemant.. A copy of tha covenant sha~1 be suLisni~ted to and approvsd
by the City Attorney prior to recordakion. A copy oE rha recorclod
covenant shall be furnishecl ta the Zoning Division.
4• That prior to t2ie introduction of an ordinance rezonzng aubjQCt
property, Conditi.on Vos. l, 2, 3, 4 and 5, above-mentioned, shall be
completed. Thg provisions or rights qranted by thzs r.esolution shall
become nu11 and void by action nf tho PXanni:ng Commission unles~ said
eonditians ar~ compl:ied with within one year ,Erom the c~ate of ~his
resolt-t3on, or ~uch ~ua•ther time as the Planna.ng Commission may grant.
'%. That approval of this appl:.caCion const.itutes ap~roval of tlia
proposed rQquest only to the ext~gnt that it complies with the Anahei.m
Municipal Zoning Code and any other appl?cak,~1Q City requlations.
Approval does r.ot include any action or fi.ndings as to compliance or
approval pf the reque,^,L• regar3ir.g any other applia~ble orcli.nance,
requlation or requiremont,
~E IT FURTHER RESOLVED t:h~t the Anaheim City P13nning Commi.ssion does
horeby find arici determine that ~~d~ptipn of this Res~luLion as oxpress]y
predicated upon applicant's compl.ic~nce wit}i each ~nd all of the conditions
herginabove set L•orth. Shoiild any such conditi~ns, or any pai•t thoreof, be
daclared invalid or uneni`~rceab].e by tkio ~inal judyrrent of any court of
competent jurisciiction, then this Rosnluti.on, and any approvals Y~orein
contai~ied, sha11 be deemed nulJ. and void.
TH~ FOR~GOTNG RESULUTION is signctd and approved by me this 4L-h ci$y o~
January, ~,gg~, ,
' ~ , ~~
_ •,,,, , ; ; . ",'.~ : ~__ i'
-, ~ .
CHAIRWOi~AN, ANAHEIM CITY FLANNINC, COb4r(TSSION
ATTEST: ~`
_ lt' ~~,~~ r 's
~~'~
SEC1tETARY, ANAHE;IM CtTY P~TN ~
c cor~.ir.sszorr ~'.
~3 PC 89-07.
`I~r
~ti ,
;V i
~,.; ,
i, ;
'~;i
r,
uww>Yanrri~tatr,~,11w;
. , ,. . ~ .,. . ,. , v . . , {•,~.
~~ { ~
~
~:k,K2
)'~~rpt~ i ~ ~.' ,`.(i ~l7tiir~ %~;
~ .. .,~.. . , . _.
S~'A,TE QF ~ALIFOkt]TA )
COIJNTY l7F QRANG~ ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHExM )
x. Fdith L. kiar~~~, Secretary of ~he Anaheim Cit,y Flanning
Cr~mmission, do hereby certif.y that the foregoing res~lution was passed and
adapted at a meoting of tha Annheim City Planning Comm33sion held on Janunry
~~ ].989, by r~e f~llowing vote of• the mQmbers therQOE;
AYFS: COhIIdISSIONERS: BOUAS, IIOYDSTUN, CARU5ILL0, F~LDFiALTS,
MC BURNEY, MESSE
NOES; COMMISSIONETtS: HERBST
ASSF.2dT; COhIIQTSSI02dERS: NONG
IN WITNESS WFYEREO~', I h~ve hereunto set my ?xand this 4th day of
January, 1989.
_._.~.~~ ~ ~., -
- - , J~.~.._~
SECRE'rARY, ANIHETM CITX` PLI~NlrIN~ COMMI;SION
-4-
PC A9~01