Resolution-PC 89-10~''i~..t~
~~J:..~~ . ,. . .. . . ~ _ . . . ~r i',~ . ~,; ~ o ~ ±.~att u~, 1 V '1l7 'ir..~~~~ t ~i~rr' a r:~i;~.Y ~ ~l „'3'P1+ ~~ ~~i',~i~~{,~~Vrh
.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . .. . .
` 1~
~~~r~
FtC JT. QN__t7Q. p~~2-~
A ItF,50LU1'ION OF TIiL A23AHEIM CITY F~r,ANP1TNG COMMISSION
THAr PETITION FOR VARIANC~ N0. 3f38g BE GRANTrD
Wh~REAS, the Anaheim City Planning t~~mm3.ssion dici receive a
veri£.ied Petl.tiou for Variance Erom 38f39 FiAR:iOR CLTFF PARTNERSHIP,. WES'rFRN
NATIONAL PRUPERTI~S, 630 T.ha City Dr.:ve, Arango, CA 92667, owner, ~n~ ,~~~
WATSON, 1316 Allec Streot, Ana.h3im, CA 92603, agenC tor certa.in rcal property
situatc~d in Che Ci.ty oE Analic~im, Coun'ty of Or~nge, State oE CaliEornia
cle~cribed ~s;
TXiAT ~~ORTION OF TFiE SOUTH I~ALF OF' T13E NOR'PHWEST
~ QUATc1'ER OF THE SOUTI~EAST QUA1tTER OF SECTION 2'7,
'.COW'NSHIY 4 SOUTH, RANGfi lU WEST, PARTLY [N' TFIE RANCHO
~ LAS BOLSAS AND rARTLY IN 1HE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE
' SANTA ANA, I?7 TH~ CTTY OF ANAHETM, COUrTTY OF UR~INCE,
, STATE OF CAP7FORN'IA, AS SAID SECTION IS SHCWN OF A
MAP RECORDi:P~ IN H(1pK 51 PAGL YO OR MISCELLAI~TEOUS
MApS. Itd T?it; OFFZCE OF 1'H~ COUNTY R~CORDE22 OI' SAID
COL'NTY, D~SCR,TSL•`D AS FOLLOWS:
HEGT:~NING AT 1'IiE NORTHWEST CORNER ~R SAl T) SOUTH HALF. ,
THENCF SOUTH 0 DFGFF.ES 42 MINUTES 47 $ECONDS EAST
200.00 F~ET ALONG TFIL W~ST LINE OF SAID SOUTS HALE TO
T.HE xRUE pOIN'f OF BEGINNING, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGRF;ES
3$ MYN'JTCS 0? SECONDS FAST 3GA.00 FEET PARALI,~L Tp
TH~ NURTFI LINE OE' SAID SOU'PIi HALE, THENCE NOR'rH 0
DEGRFES 42 MTNUTES 47 SCGONDS WEST 200.00 FFET
PRRALLEL TO THE WEST LTNF OF SAID SOUTH HALF TO THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID SOItTH HALF, THENCE SOUTH 87
DEGREES 38 MINUTGS J~ SFCONDS EAST, 450.00 FEET
ALOVG SAID 2JORTH LI"', T.HFNC:E SO(1TH 0 DEGKEES 42
MINUTF.S 47 SFCONDS ~:A5T, 439.02 F~E7: PARALLEI, TA THE
WEST LINF OF SATD SOUTH HALF OF A T,INE PAF2ALLEL WITFI
AND DISTANT 221.00 F~:ET M~;ASURED AT 12IGHT A~I(;LES
NORTHF~tLY ~F0~4 THF; SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTFiEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTI02~ 27,
THEt7C~ NOF2TH 89 DEGREES 3F3 MINUTES 14 SECnNDS WEST,
450.00 FEE'P ALONG SAID PARAT,LEL LTNE, TfiENCE NORTH 0
DEGREES 42 MINUTES 4T SECONDS W~ST 200.04 FEET
PARALLF;L TO TI?F. ~IEST LING OF SAID SOUTFi HALF TO A
L;.*IF, PARAGLEL WI~H AND DISTAIv: 239.00 FE;GT, MEASURED
AT I2IGHT ANGLf:S 60(1xHERLY FROM TFIB NORTH LTNE OF SAID
SOUTH HALF, THENCE NORTH 89 UEGREES 39 1QIN[JTES 07
SECON~S WES'1.' 3Q9.09 FEET ALONG SAID PAItALL,~L i.YNE ~~
THE W~ST L1NE OF SAID aOUTFii HAL~~, xHFNCL ~IARTH 0
DF.GR~ES 9.2 MINCTxES 47 SECONDS WF.ST 39. QO F'GBT TO TFIF
TRUE POIN:C OF B~GINN'lNG.
0618r
-1-
PC 89•-10
~', ~ "~
::~
__ . ~ E~~~
H~~~ ~
~ ,
WHERGAS, the C:.ty ~:lanning Comrt~ission did hold ~t publ3c ht~ari».c~
at the C.ivic. Canter. in thc City oF Anaheim on January 16, 1989, at 1t30 p.n;.,
no~iae of said publie hearing havinq been duly yivon as requirec] by law mnd 3n
accordr~nce with the provisions of ~ha Anahaim Municipal Codo, Ch~pt;er 18.03,
to hear 1nd cons3d~r evidence for snd against ~aid propased variance anc3 t~
invesL•igata and make findi.ngs and rocommendatians in r.onnection therewith; and
WFIEREAS, said CommYSSion, after 11ue inspectian, inve3tir~~~ion
and study made by it5e1P and in its bahalF, and aftc~r r~u~ consideration of all
ovidence aiid reports o£fered at said hear:ing, do~s £ind and determine the
following facts:
^
1. That ~he potiL-ioner praposes waiver of thQ tallowing under
authoxxty of Codo 5ec.tion 18.05.042 to retain aii 84 3c~.ft. freestanding
i3enti~ication sfgn.
~ A } ~~Nr~. 1 ~.z.Q~y~~ ~Q2 Q
.~~~$~.~4 ~'L
~ B ~ ~-~ ~T'~Q~t- ~ 9 ~..~4~9~R..~2 -
~n~l 18.3~.06? Q,~2
" Maximum~rQ~of rRn~raaz~.~•
(?:9- ~a. f~,. sign panel permitteds 23.5
,sa. f.~.~. oxist3xig)
M~x lm,~-nLr-g~-2f ~g~.f f i c at i n
n s .i an~,
~?~2,~~. sign panel pgr.mitted; 60.5
~~.t f~ existing)
2. That tho proposod var•.~.~rica .is hereby qranted, in part, to
PBxmit c~ne sev~nty sQVen (~~) square foot sign ~n Harbor IIoulovard.
3. That the above-mentioned waivers are Yiereby granted on the
basis that there arR special circumstances appllcabla to the property such a~
size, vha~e, topography, locakion and su~round.ings whicl~ do noL- apply to ather
ident.ically zoned prop~rtx in the same vicinz~y; and tk~at strlct applicaL•ion
oE the Zoning Coda deprives Lhe proporty oE privilogc~s enjoyed by ather
gropert3es in the idenl:.ical zon~ and classification in the vicinity.
4. That thora are excepLional or extraorcdinary circumstances
or conditions applicabla to th~ property involved or to the intended use of
the property that Qo not apply genera.lly ~u the proporty or class of use in
the same vicinity and zone.
5. Tliat lhe requested variance, as granted, is ne~essary for
tho preaervation and onjoyment of a suhstantial propgrty riqht possosaed by
other property in the same ~riciiiity and zone, and denied to tho property in
question.
6. That the requeaSced varianc~, aa granted, will nat be
materially detrimt~ntal to the public wslfare or i.njuriou~ to t-he property or
improvem4nts in such vicinity and znnc~ in whach rhQ property is locatecl.
_2_
PC89-lU
~; yp
, :;';.i,!
,~;~,
'f;`
e.:
.~~.. ,. .v~.1:: .Ml1'.t~..,,~ ~, .
.. . . . .. . .... ~ 1 h"~ ( i~..4~!~.~~t . .. ~ '!; t `
.. . f`j~~' ~~~ t ~~~ +tY/~Nid'N~~1 ftiiHl~'~yy
, }'~; ~ '7r~,~,~~'+rr ,
, .,,.
~rti~'~ ~ f~
~~
7. That no one indicated their pros~nce at
in oppositipn; r~ncl that nn narrespondonce was receivedU 3,n ou~~~'~ hearing '
subject gr~Citiun, pposition to ,~
~AT~z .r'.4H.NiA ENVIRQ_„_ E~lTAL, AL'TX T FT ~,T
Direator or h3s auth~rized r.eprasentative ha~tQrmz~ned thatTthe propo~oc~
project falls wi,thin the de£inition of Categorical Exemptians, C1ass 11, $s
defined in thc~ State E:IR GuidNli,iies an~ is, theretore, categoci.cally exemPt
fxom the .requirement Co prepRre an EIR.
rrow,THEREFI~RE, BE T7' R~SO~VED that th~ Anaheim City Pl~snninc~
Commission do~s hereby gr~nt in p2.t subjoct petftiun fax Variance~ upon the
foZ].owiny conditinns which are hereby ~ound tc, be a k:ecessary prereguiszke to
the proposed use of tri~ subject property in urder to preserve the safRty and
gQneral wQlfare of th~ Citi~ens of the CiL-y oL AnahQim:
1. Tiiat tk~~ bottommost portion of subject freestiandittg siyn shal] be na
closer than eight (8) i•eat to the ground leve]. dix~ectly below.
z. That subject property shall be d~vglopec~ substantially 3,n accordauce with
plsns and specif'.icatians on fzle with tho City of Analieim marked of
Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, provided, however, t-hat the maximum area shall not
esceeded soventy s~ven (77j square feet,
3. ~hat Condi.tion Nos. ], and 2, above-mQnti,nned, shall be completea withiii ~
perio@ of thirty (30) days from tti~ clate of this resolution.
4• ~hat apprcval of th,is application coustitutes t~pproval of the proposa~]
rc~quest only to the ~xtent that it compl,ies w~~~h the 1-naheim Munic3.pa1
Zoning Code snd any other app].ic~le Ci~y~ regula+tions. T.pproval does not
incYur3e an,y act.ion ~r f~,ndings a~ to cornplisnce or a
request rogarding axiy other appliGable ord,inanco, PregL latiori ~or
rPquirAment,
BE T'~ FUI2'rHGR R~SOLVED that the Anahoim City Plann.ing Commiasion dpes
her.~by find and cteterminb l;hat hdoption of. tl~is Resolu~ion is expres~ly
predic~ted upon applicanr.'s compliance with each and all of. the rondikions
h~reine~bnve sc~t focth. Sho~iid any such conditions, or any part thereof, be
declarod invalid or ~anenEorceablo by ths fina.l judgment ~f an•
compete~.t jurisdiction, then this Renoluti.on, and an ~ 1 court bf
contai.ned, ~hal.l be do~med nu~l. and voi~. Y PProvals herein
THE FOF:LGOING RESOLU'1`IOlJ i~ ~ignecl and ~pproveJ by me th~ s 16th day oP
January, ~ggg, :
,
, • 7 ;i
----_..~r. ~~~' -L- , ' _`;i', ,,~ ~,
CH.I~IRWOMAN, AN,~Igzt„i CITY PLA2~ININ~ COD4fISSI02T
ATTES~: ~
' ,cv1i.• ~ r I ' ;
- r~ ~L~~
~
S~CRE ARY, ANAHEIM CITX PI,ANN'lt1G COMMISSION ? v
~..'
-3- PC89-In `
i .-.
} ,
~.
-_ _ _ -. . ' . . .. . .. . .:FI
ti1F.dbWM'h1"JA~l;ri1'µl'4M 1 t1 ~ ~, . ~~T^i4~r~v.x.. '. . ~. .,. ,. . . ., ~.. .. . ..... ... . . . . .
~ ~ , ~;,
r ~,r~ ~y"' r~
,
E ~r i~ ~
"r n
~~
.
;
~
,,~
'~";~J ~:~
,;ti~
.
~ , ~,
,,.~
i _
'~ ~:
;,;
~ ~ , ;_,';;:
~<
',;!
`.':a
STATE OF CALIFO.RNIA ) ~°'''
COUrITY OF ORANGE ) ss. ~ ~ ~'r`;
CITX OF A2dAHEIM ) '' l~
,;
i T, Edith T,. Harri~, Secrotary of the Anaheim C~ty Planning =~
~ Commissior-, do hereby r.orti~y that the foregoing resolution wa~s p~ssod and ''
q ~c~aptod a~ a meeting of t.he Anaheim City P].anninq Cammiasion hexcl n~ Januar~+ ~~~f.
~ 16, 7.939, by the folI.owing vote of the mer„b9rs i:hereof: '~
,'~~
AYES: COMMTSSiONETtS: BOtJAS, BOYUSTUN, ^ARi15ILL0, FELAHAUS,
~iERB3T, `j.
?
MC BURN~X, MESSE ' s.;
NOES: CObIIriISSI0N~F5t NONE ~~~
AIISFNT: COMMISSTONERS: NOTIE ''t
;s~
`'.~ IN WITt7ESS WFIERROE', I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day~ oE,
'i ].989 . ``
' ~
~
i
i .R.~f/1.~.
.L.l.~ ~ /
~
~ SECR£TARY, A4iAHF]:M CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ;
;i
,.~ S':;
~';;a
~ '!.'1>'
'V
° ~,X
;
. ,~
~
s,~ii
', y,1
~r
,i`.
',4~.
;`i~
. 4:
il1
~;'r~
d~y
;r
;~.
~ ~ ;;j,
.: ~'.''r'.
'y
~'}d
`: r
`~
l1_I~
~~~,lr.
,;4~
~ ntR
la~r .
+.':~~
n
F . .:.
fl
;~
-a-
pca9-~.
. ... _ t-
`r
,;,+~
'"
~
~~
,.y
,
s ;
~
s~~ .
1;~,
,,
~.,
;~.,, :z
_ O
;,f ;.
~~ .
,,
, ,~
,~
~,~;;~~ ,