Resolution-PC 89-105';`~r~ ~ . ~ . ~ . . ~~ ~ .
~>''~ ~~ , ' ` ~1?~
, ; ' ;;,.T4
,',
~. .
''s
$~~~TQ~I,.~~.~14 ? ,
; A RESOLZITTON OF '.CHC ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIMG C~hA~fISSTON
THAT PETITION FOR V'ARIANCE NQ, 3924 BE DF.NIED
~1HEFtEAS, thc~ Ax~aheim Ci~y P1ann3ng Commission dici rece~.~~r~ ~
<,~ ver.ified Petition for Vuri~nc~ trom DORR'Y pi,
"' Norwslk, CA 90650, awner uf certain real r operty~1sitiated sinnthe~City rbr
Anahe.im, CounL•y of Oranqe, Stare o£ California ~3escribo3 as;
THE W~~T 165,p0 FF.RT, MEASURED ALONG THk; NOP,TH LINE
OF THE SOUTFII:A~'T QUhRTER OF THF SOUTFIW~ST QUARTER QF
SF:CTTQN 9, TOWNSFIIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN TFIE
RArICHO SAN JtJAN CAJON DL•' SAN:CA ANA, CIT'.f OF AN'AI;CZM,
COUNTY Ur OR1~2~GE, STATE OF CALxFORNiA, AS SAIn
SGCTTON IS SHOWrT ON A MAp ftECqRDED IN BOOR 51, PAGE
10, MISCELLANF.OUS MAP~, xN T1HE OFFICE OF THE CQUNIY
RECpRDEK OF SAID COU~ITY, LYING NORTHFftGy OF THE
NORTHrAST~F.LY LINE OF T[iE LAND UESCR3~T;D IN THE DE~D
TU T.HF, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECQRD~D APRIL 26, 1954 TN
f300K ?.715, r~nr,E ~Z3, pt'gzCThL RECORDS.
WHEI2EAS, tY.e Ci~y Planning Commission dfd hold a
at thc~ Civic Center in kt-e Ci~y of An~heim on April 10, 1989, ptb 1 30 Qaring
notice of said oublic hearing having been d~ly givrn as reqtiired by law andmin
accordance with :ha provisions of the Anaheim Mu.nicipa2 Code, Chapter 18.Q3,
to hoaz• and consider ovidence f.or and against said proposed variance ~nd to
inves~igate and mal:e f.indings and recommendation:s in connection thQrewi~h; ancl
WHEREAS, said Commission, af~er due inspection, investigation
a~d study mada by it~elf and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidenca and re~ports offerod at said he~rinq, does ~ind and cle~ertnS.nc~ the
following facts:
1• That hhe petirioner requests waivers of rhp ,fpj],O~lI1C~ tp
con,~ruct a second story addition to ar_ existing oEfir_e buil.iing;
(a~ ~~x143~~@~4.~5?~2~41~ - M~~in~m stru~.u~.~.~}~i~~•
«~ ~~ permitled when lor,aC~d 22 fe~t from
RS-10, OOU aoninq; 2~4 f.~g~ F*opo~ecl)
( b ) ~~~~39~'L.18s.'1.~:~~. Q24
" ~1%.L~1I[~J__~~.F~~~~'~1 sot?~~s..
~.t f~t~ requirQd from Wilshi.re Avsnue;
?iQn~ proposocl)
0807r.
-1-
FCB~-105
,,,sF:•, ~~~',`,h
i ~'•'~~
2. Th~t the above-mentionecl waivers are hereby deiii~d on the ba~is
that thc~re ~ro n~ spocial cirrumst~xnces ap~liaabl2 to the Proporty such as
:,ize, s2xape, topography, loaaL-ion 2nd surro~andings which da not apply to other
+ ider~t5.cally zoned proporty in the same vicfn3ty; and that strict applica~ion
~ oE the Zoning Code dues not ~eprive L•he praperty of ~rivil~ges enjoyed by
~ othor proparkies in the idexitica'1 zone nn3 classificzt.ion .in the vicinity.
~:
,~
3. That thero are no exceptional or extraordinary a3.rcumstanaes or
conditions applica.ble to the proper*.y involved nr to the in~ended use of the
property that do not apply g~ner.atly tc th~ ~raper~y or alass o~ usd in the
same v::~inity and xone.
4. That the requested vfir.iancQ i.s n~t necessa~y for thQ
prc~servation and enjoyment of a substantial property :ight possessed by ~ther
property in tho same vicinity and zone, and denied to the prop~rty in ~uostion.
5. That the requestod varianr.e will be mztPrially detrimental to
tha public welfare or injurious to the pro~i~rty or improvement: in such
vicinity and zone in whiali l:Y:s property is located.
6. Th~t seven (7) peoF'le indicar.dd their presence at said public
h~aring in oppa~ition; and one (1) lerter of corresponaer,ce was received in
oppasition to sub~ect petiti~n.
' LTr RNII~~NVIRONMENTAC,__Q JLAGI,~x ACT~'INDI ~: That the Anaheim
C3.ty Planning Commission l~as reviewed ~hc;~ proposal to construct a second
story addition to an existinq of.ficQ t~uilding with waivers of maximum
structural height and minimum structur3l setback on an ir.r.~egularly-shape~d
paY•cel of land cnnsisting of approxiieat~ly 0.43 acre, hav.ing an approxim~te
frontage of 1'70 fgeY. on the r.orth side of Wil~hiz~~ Avenuo, having a maxim•,am
depth of approximately 139 fe~~, being located approxima~h.ely 660 .feet
southenst of the c:enterline of L~ara StrQet unci ~urther descr:ibed as 300
North Wil~hi.r.e Avenue; and does hercby a~prove th~ Neg~tive Declart~tion ucan
finc?ing tk~at it has cox~sidered the NagaCivo Declaration togother with any
co:nment~ received during the p~iblic review proceas and furtY-~r finding on the
bas.is of the iuitial G~11C1y and nny co~nments received that there is no
subsrantial gvidence tt-at the pro~ect wlll have a 3ignif.ican~ effect on tho
environment.
NOW,THERBFORE, BE iT RESOLVED th~t the Anahoim City Paanninq
Corr.mission does hereby dony ~ubject petiticn of JariaxicQ on the basio of the
aforementioned findings.
TH~ FOREGOING RESOLUTION is sign~8 anu approved by me this IOCh o£
Apri1, 1989.
~_ ...--.~.~lL .~,~ • ~• ' / ' ~rt'. f __ -
i,HAIEtWOirfAN,;IANA.I3EIM~ C PI,ANNING COMMISSION
y~,
ATT~STt
~' ~~~ / t.~'~~'(/,~ .-- ----
-~- ~
_, SECI2ETAR , AN'1~-HGIM CITY PLANi11N(~ CGI~MISSILN
-2-
•51!M1Y14~R~)
r;~
i~
PC89-105 ;`~,
;:~~I
, ,tii~i
r~}r
r
7` W i~'~+
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTX OE GRANGE ) s~.
CITY' OF ANAHEIM )
I, ~dith L. Harris, Secretary Af the Anariaim City Planning
Commission, do herery certiEy ~hat the Eor.egoin.g reaolutiott wa~ paes~d anfl
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City P.lanning Cammission held on A~ril
10, 1989, by L•he followi;~g vote of the mambers thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: B~YD~TUN, CAI2USILLO, FELAHAUS, HERBST~
MESS~, MC BURNLY
NOES: CO2~fI5SI0NERS: NOI3E
ABS~NT: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS
IN I~7TitES5 WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this lOth day o~
April, 1989. ~
~ ~~QJ~t~--____~2~~! ~~~'~'~~
SECRETARY, ANAIiEIM C'LANNING COMbIISSION
~ra
~
r
' t
-3--
PC89-lOS
,,f ,
:, `'s
1'~.'.. ' . . . , .. ~ ~ . . .. . . , .. fl ~.