Resolution-PC 89-116. . . . . ~ ~ . , ' ~ '~M1i~~~;~~. ~y~~
I~ 7~"t
~"'": ~~ ~
gr L xz~ N.~.~4=?~.5~
A RESOLUTION O[' THE AI~AHEIM CITY PLANNINC COMMISSION' RECOIr4dFNDING
THAT PETIT:[ON FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3192 B~ GRANTED
W~ERETS, on the Anaheim City Plann3ng Comm3.sgion di~ receive a
varif:ied Petit3on for Conditional Use Perm~t Erom RONALD L. HERRICK, 3405
Arlington Avenue, Riverr~ide, CA 9250ti, owner, and EL POLLO LUCO, Attention:
Ric;hard Escalanto, :16700 Valley View Avc~nue, La Mirad~, CA 90637, agent for
certain real property situated in tli~ City of Anaheim, County of ~rango, State
of Cali[ornia, described a~:
LO't5 4, 5 I~ND 6 OH TRACT NU. 498, "F3ERGGR~HALF
ACR~S", AS PER M11P RECORDED IN BOOK 19, PAGE 24 OF
MISCELL,ANEOUS MA~S, IN THL OFFICF OF TNE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID (;OUNTY.
WHER~AS, the City Plannfng Commi3szon did ho7.d a Qublic h~aring at
the Civic CenCer in the City of Anaheim on April Z4, :.989 at 1:30 p.m., not.fce
of said public he~ring having been duly given a3 required bx l~aw and i,n
accordanc~ with the provisions of the Anah~im Municipal Cade, Cha~ter ~.8.03,
to hear and consider evidonce f~r and against said proposed conditional usd
permit and to invHStigate ~nd make Findings anc'. :ecommer,dations in connecti~n
therewith; an~
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itsolf and in its behalf, an~ after due cons3deratio.n of all
r~vi.dQnce and re~por~s offered at said hgarinq, does find and dQtermine the
f~liowing factss
1. xhat the~ petitionc~r request approval uf a Con~lit,ional Use
Permit under author.tty of CodP Section 18.48.050.2U~ to permit a drive-throi:gh
re~taurant.
2. That the propUSe~d use aill not• adversely aff~c~. the adjoininq
land uses niid the gi•owth and dev~lopmer.t of tho eroa in which it is prqposed
to be located.
3. ~hat Che sizo nnd shape of t2:e 3ite proposed for the use is
adaqustc to ~1J.ow the full devalopment oF the propoood use in a manner not
detrimental to the partic~slar area nor to the peac.e, health, safety and
cJoneral Wol.fare of the Citizons of. the City of Anaheim.
4. That the grantinq of the Cond'ztional tise Permit ~ander the
conditions imposed, if any, will not be dQtrimental to the Qeace, health,
safet~- and gonoral welfare oF the Citfzens uf the City uf A,naheim.
5. :hat khe traffic generated by t;1e prnpoROd use wil.l not impase
an unduo burdan ~lp~n t:he streetJ and hiqhways dosigned ~-n8 improveci to carry
the trafEic in the area.
0842r
_1_
PCBy-116
,,.
~ ~1
, ~~
~
~r'. '~{'
~
i .~,.•r}it 4 M~kk~~y4
i i ~
~~'~ ~ 1~ li.r .
51)~
i ~~r
':v ;
. . . .. :~i;!
r<rr
I' .
6. That na one indicated t~eir presence at sa3c~ public ha~rir.g in
opposi~ion; ax-d th~-t no c:o: respondence was received in uppo~ition i:o t'he
subject petition.
~LIFO~tNIILENV,tRQN~ T~AI~Qi~T.~Y ~CT ~~NDING; That the Anaheim
~City F?laniiing Cosnm.ission has reviQwed the proposa2 to perm3t; a drive-~hrough
restaur.ank (E1 Pol1o Loc~) on o. rertanc~ularly-shaped par.cei ~f land
consisting of approMimately 1.3]. acres locral-ed at the southwest corner of
Katella Way and Mountain View Avenue, having appti•oximate frontagos af. ;.16
f:eet on the sou*h side o£ Kutel?A Wax nnd 263 feet on the wASt side oE
Mountain View Avenue, and further dQSCribed as 3].U, 316, ar.d 320 Fast Katella
Way; and cioes hereby ~pprove the ZTegative Declaration upon findi.ng that it
Y~as considerod the Negative Declara~ian togethc~r w3.th any comments received
duriny the publie review procoss anc! further fincling on thQ basis oi the
initiul s~udy and any comm~nts recoiveA that there .is na aubstant;al eviclence
L•hat the project will ~iave a significant eff.QCt on the environment.
i NOW, THEREI'OP.E, BE IT RFSOLVED L-hat; the AnahQim City Planuing
; Commission doea here~y yrant suk~ject Pc~tiYion ~or Conditiona) Uso Permit,
; upon the following coridit3ons whic~ aro heraby found k~ bQ a necessary
~ prerec~uis.ite to the proposed use of the subjoct properL-y in ordar. to preserve
~ tho safety and gQnaral weltare ~f t.he Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
~ 1. That przo: to issuance of a bu31 ding pe:mit, the appxopriato traffic
signal as~sessrnent ~ee sht~11 be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount
as ~stablishad b~ City Council resolution.
2. Thnt the C~'_'1V@W~x' a-: the ~oint of the inter.sectior. with th~ public
right-of-way shall be betwQen twenty four (24) ancl thirty (30) fes¢ wride,
~~ as rt~quizod by the City Traffic; Engzneer.
~ 3. That the driveway shul.l be construct~d with tQn (10) foot radius curb
' returns as required by thP Ci~y Engint~er.
,
4. ~hat a Eeg aha11 be paid to the City of Anahe.im fnr. stree;: lighting along
M~untain View Avenue in an amourit as es~xblished by City Council
rPSOlution.
5. That a fee shall be aaid to tha City ot An~heim for tree plant.ing alonq
t Mountain View Avenue anci KateJ.la Way in an amount as establiohed b~r City
, Council resolution.
6. That street lightinq €acflities aloilg KaY.o11a Way shall be insta].lc3cl as
required by tha Utilities General Manaqc~r in accorc'~ance with
speciFicar,ions on f3.le in ~he Offxce of Utilit3eg General Mai~agert or
thxt security in the Eorm ot a bend, cortificate of deposft, letter of
c.reQit, or essh, in an amount and forrr st~tisfa~tory Lu t;he City o~
Anahofm, shall be post~d with the C3ty to guarantae the satis.factory
compl.etion cf the above-mentioned improvements. Said s~curil.y ohal]. be
pos~ed ~rith the City of Anaheim pri~r to .fssuance of a buildfng permit.
The ~-bove-required improvemenks shsll be in3ta~11c~d pr.ior to occupar.cy.
//~d
-2- PC89;,L2'r
;;.
,r
;
~f
- -- . . , .. ~.;-~i.~!... ':,'.
: ~;
~
iIC~ , -- ,;ri „i~ ~~~
w ~ ~~ ' `C~~
,~1~ ~
r '~~.
~ `'~ ~,
. ~ ~ ~;,t}j~
7. Tha~ subject property sht~ll be served by underground u~ilitfos; ~nd that
i
•
pr
nz
to issuance af a building permit, khe lagal owners of subjoct
r
p
op~r~y shall execute and record a covenant in A form approvad by the
City Attorno
y's OEfic
h
,
e w
erein su~ch ~wners agree not to conte~t the
formati~n of
an assessment di~trict(s) which ~n~y hereaf~er be farmecl
for
the
,
purpase oE Pinancing ~he undergrounding of ut3litie3 ~
n the
I`F .
Commercial Recreatior~ arRa, whick~ d3strict(~) could include subject
.,, ProPe.rty.
8. That the owner of ~ubject prohert}• shall submit a'laCter requesting
tc~rmination o£ Varia
N
neQ
oz. 808, 3217 and 210a to thR Zoning Division.
9. Thttt in thQ event a parcol map is not recorded ccmbir..ing the thre~ (3)
existing lots
th
,
e legal property owiier sha11 Eurnish ~he 2oning Divis3
on
with
_ .
a copy o£ ~arded covenant and a~r~ement in a Eorm approved by
the Czty Atturn~ ;r
eein
t
h
l
.
g
o
o
d sub~ect prt~perty as ~z~e (1) parcel.
10. That trash storage areas shall bo provided and ma3ntained in a ~ocation
acceptable L-o the Street Mai~tenance and Sanit~tian Division ~
nd i
.
n
accordance with approved plans on file wi~h eaia i)ivision.
11. That a11 air conditioning facilitiey and other roof and groun3 rnounted
eguipment .sha11 b
e pr~perly ~hielded from viewr.
12. That the p~opo3al sha11 comply with all signinq requiromente of thc~ CR
"Commerical .Recreation" Zone, unless a variance allowin,q sign waivers i,s
appruvQCl by khe City Council, Planniny Cammiss.ion ox Zoniny Admznistrator.
13. That thc~ on-•s.il•e land~caping shall be maintained in c~mplianco w3.th C.ity
standards.
l~. That ~ubjec~ praperty sha2l be develope~ substantia].ly in accordance with
pians and spe~ifications on fila with the Ci~y of Anaheim marked Exhibit
Nos. 1 througti 3.
15. Thar prior to issuance of a building permit or witrin a period of one (1)
year from the date af this resolution, whichever occurs first, Conditian
Noa. 1, 2 and 4 through 9, above-montioned, shail be aamplied wi~h.
Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be granted in
accordance with 5~ction 18.03.090 of the Anahoim Municipal Codo.
1G. That prior to final buil3ing and zuning iuspections, Conr~ition Noa. 2, 3,
6, 10, 11 and ~4, above-menti.oned, sha11 be complied with.
17. That approval o~ thi~s applic~tion constiCutes approva]. of the progosyci
request only to thQ extent that it complfes with thc~ Ant~hQim Municipal
2oninq Code and any other applicable City reguiations. Approval does not
include sriy action ar. tindings ms to comp7..iana~ cr approval ot the
requ~st r.egaxdsng any other applicable ordinanr2, xegulation ox
roquirement.
~~,
-3-
~ ~:~
^'
~u„~ i,. ~
~
PC89 ~7rI7 .
.1
~~
...,.vn.
0
•
f~
~ ~t
i
hereby i3,:id and determinQ that a~:option oE Chis Resolut.zun 3s expressly
orodi;ated upon ~pplicant'~ aanp:liana~ with e~ach and a11 of the cond3ti.ona
hereinabove get for.th. Shr~uld a.ny such conditians, or zny part thercaof, be
declt~red invalid or unenforcaable by~ the fxnul judgmont oE any court af
competgnt jurisdiction, ~,hen LY:is ktes~lut:ion, and any r~pprova~s herein
contained, sha11 be deameci null and void.
J. !
5E IT FURTHER E2ES~LV~D that the Anaheim Ciry Planiiing Commission doos ':~
THE FORF.GOING RESULUTtON is signed, and approved by me this 24th day oF
Apri]., I989.
/~.~
j •'~',.~ t.l% ~ /}~'~',r~;?y~_,
- ~ ....~.~1~~.
CHAIRWOMAN, 41NAFTEIM CITY PLAN~ITNG COMMTSSION
Y~ :
ATTEST:
; .
j -, _°'1~.Y"L-GL.t,'t..~..~~ __.
~ SECREiARY, ATTAHEIM CI:~Y PLAA'ININ~ COMMI55XON
STATE Ok' CAI,IFOF.NIA )
COUNTY QF ORANGF ) ~~.
CITY OF ANAHEiM ~
~~~ . ~
.~- ~'~:~~!_____ ~ln.c..~r% ,
SECRETARX, ANAFiEIM CITY PI.ANNING COMMJSfiI0P1
r~~ ,;
-4- PC89-]rl't ':``~
I, Edith G. FIarris, Secretary o~ the Anaheim City P1H~ariing
Commissiun, do hereby cerL•ify that the fort~qoing resoluricn was passed and
adoptdd at a meetinq of the AnahPim City Planning Comm3.ssi~n held on April 24,
1989, by the Eollowin~ vote of tha members L•hcreof:
AYEa: C~IrASISSIONk".Ru: BOUAS, J3JYDSTUN, ~'CLDFiAUS, HERBST, ?QES5S
NOES: COt~fISSI0NER5: NOr:e
ABSENT: COMM7SSIONERS: CARUSILI,b, MC BURNEY
Ik~ WTTi1FSS h'HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand th9.s 24th day of
Apr.il, 198~.
? ~yt
:.: ~
~;~
. ,. , ~~~