Resolution-PC 89-123,t '
~
ItESOLL~T'IQ,_N P $9_:12~
^
; ;;~;
;;
A RFSOLLJTION OF THE ANAT•IEIM CITY PLANNINC COMMTSSION
TEIAT PETITION I'OR RECLASSIFICA'PION N0. 88-539-32 BE GRANTEI)
hTIiCRRAS, the Anahaim City Plannin~ Commission did raceive a
~ veri£ied petati~n for ReclassiFication from Linda I,ee Sprague, 1305 1/2 W.
1`" Nor~h Street, Arlaheim, CA 92803, owner of csrtain re~l prpperty si.tuated in
the Gity c,£ Anaheim, Counky of Orange, State o€ CaliPoxnia, desc:ribed as
Follows:
PARCEi~ 1: TNAT PORTION OF SECTION 9, TOWNuFiIP 4
SOUTfi, R~IG~ :LO WEST, IN 1'HE RANCFiO SAN JUAN CAJQN DE
SANTA ANA, IN THE CITX OF ANAHEIM, AS SfiOWN ON A MAP
RECOitDED IN BOUK 51, FAGE 10, MISCELLANEUUS MAPS,
REC,ORDS OI' SAID ORAN~G COUDTTY, DESCRIBED AS FULLOWS:
BEGI2INING AT A POINT UN THE tJORTFiERLY LIt7E OF LUT 4,
AS SHOWN ON A LICENSED SURVr.YOR's MAP OF PnRTION OF
SAID SCCTION 9, MADE FOR F.W. FLEISCHMANN AND AS
SHUWN ON A MAP OF SUFVGY RECORDCD IN BOOK 1, PAGG 56.
RECORD OF SURVEY.~, 289.82 FEET WESTERLY EROM THE
CL~TTER LINr OF WF;ST STREE'P, AS SFiOWN ON SAIA DiAP;
TFIENCE SOTJTFTERLY 1,176.4 FEBT PARALLEL, WITH THE
WESTERLY LINE OF' 1'H~ W~ST HALF OH THE NORTHWES~
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION T~ THE SOfJTHERLY LIIJF:, TO TFiE
:CRUE POINT OF BE:GI2INING; THENCE NOfi;HERLX 426 FEET
PAf.2AL'LE~. PIITH THE EASTL•'RLX LINE QF THE WGST ~IALF OF
'~HE NORTF!WGST QUARTER OF' SAID SECTION 9; 1'YiENCE
WGSTERLY 110 FEE1 PARALLSI. WITH THE SOUTHRR'LY LINE OF
SAID LOT 41 THENCE SOUTHGRLX 198.00 FEET TO 7'fiE
NORTHyVEST CORNEF OE' THE LAND C(3NVEY~L TO EDP7ARA A.
TUF.NER AND WTFE, BY DErD RECORDED J~1rTUARY 30, .1951 IN
IIOOK Z137, PAGE 11, QFF'ICIAL RECOkDS; THENCE EASTEI2LY
6~'E~T PARALL~L WITI~ TIiE SOUTH~RLY LINE OF SAIU GOT 4
TO THB NORTHEASTERLY CnRNER OF THE L1~ND CON~lEYCD TO
TURNER; THENCE SOUTHGRLY 228.00 FEET ALONG THE
EAST~RLY LTNE OF S1~ID LAND CONV~YED TO TURN~R TO TFiE
SOUTHER'LY LINE C'~F SAID LOT 4; TEIENCE FASTERLY 104
FEEm ALONG SAID SO(1TFiER LINE TO TNE POTNT OE
BF.GINNING.
PARCEL 2 S THAT POR'1'SON C~F SECTION 9 r IN TOWNSHIP 4
o, SOUTH, R7,NGE 1U WEST, SAN HERNARUIt70 BASE AND
MERIDII-N, IN 'THL CTTY 0~ ANN~iEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CALIFG`RNIA, DESCftIBED AS F'OLLOWS:
BEGINNING Ax A PCINT IIJ THE NORTHERLY LIiIE OI' LOT 4,
~ AS SHOWN ON A LICENSEU SUkVEYdR' S, :dAP OF A POR'PION
+. ~F SAID ~ECTION 9, MADE F012 E'.W. FLEISCEiMAN AND FILF~D
IN HOOK 1, PA~E 56, OI' RECORLI OF SURVEYS, IN ITS
,.
OFFICE OF TH~ COUNTX RECORDER OF SAID ORANGE Cfl(1NTY,
289.82 rEE;T WESTERLY FROM THG C~NTER LINE OF WFST
5TR~;~T, AS SHOWN ON SAIU MAP; THENCE SOUTHERLY
PARAL'LEI. bJITH THE EASTERLX LINE OF THE WEST HALc^ pF
° THE NORTHCAST QUAR7'ER OF SAID SECTION, 1176.4 FEET IN
0850r -I- PC89-123
~a
~;, :
~~
~~
TF3L SOUTHERLY LINF 01 SAID LOT 4; TI3~NCE WESTERLY
AL~NG SAIll SOUTHEFLY GINE 67E1 FE~T TO THE TRUE POINT
OI' ~EGINNING dF T.HE BOUNDARY OF THE LAND FiEREIN
DESCRIBED; THENCE NORTHERLY PARALLEL W]:TH THE
EASTGRLY C,]:NE OF THE WI:ST HALF nF T.HE ~10RTFiWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SEC?.'ION 9, 228.U0 FEFT; THFNCE
WEST~RLY P1~.RALLEL 'WITH THE SOUTHF:RLY. LINE OF SAID LOT
4, 6:1 FEEt; THENCE 50UTH~:RLY PARALLEL WITFi THE
EAST~;RLY LINC OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAIn SECTIOtI 9, 228.00 FEET TO THE
SOU'PHERI:Y LINE QF SATD LOT 4; TH~NCE EASTERLY AGONG
SAID SOUTfIERLY LTNE OF LOT 4, 61 ~GET TO THE TRUG
POINT Qk' fsEGINZTING OF 7.'HIS DESCRIPTION.
WH~REAS, the City Planriing Commission did hald public hearings
at the Civfc Center in the C~~~y of Anaheim on January 16, 1989 at 1:30 p.m.
and continueil the haaring to February 27, 1989 and wnsreas subject petition
was readvertised for March 13, 1989 at 1:30 p.n~., notice of said publ:ia
hearinys havinq been duly qiven as requiic~3 by law and in accozdance with the
provisions o£ the Anahaim Municipnl Code, ~h~pter 18.03, ~o '~ear and consider
eviclancca Lor ar~d against said proposad reclassiFication and to invostigate and
make L•indinqs and recommendations in e~n:~ectiun tharewith; and said petiti~n
was continued tc the meeCing~ of Apzil 1Q, 1989 and May 8, 19~9; and
~1FtE12EA5, said Commission, after duR inspection, in~ :stigation az~d
study made by itself and in its b~half, and after due cansidaration of all
evidc~nc:e arid reports oEfersd at said haariT.g, doe ~~ind and dFtermzrie the
followiu~3 factb:
l. T2iat the pQtitioner pr.~pos~s rQCla~sification of subject
propezty From the RS--10,000 (R~sidentill, Sinqle-Fami.ly) zono to the RM-3000
(Rosidentia]., Multiple-Fami.ty) Zone.
i. Th~tt subjec;t reclassificaCion was originally acivertised for
reclassification to khe RM-1200 (Resido:itial, Multiple-Family) 2one for the
Janaur,y 16, 1989, public heariny; however, rovi~od pl~ana were submitt6d at the
Planniiig Comminsion's reguest to reclassify the prop~rty to the RM-30U0
(F~osiden~ial, Multiplo-Famil,y) ~one and ~subject petition was L•herefore
readvertised L•or March 13, Y989.
3. That khe Anaheim General Plan designates subject propert,y for a.
medium density residgntial land uses, pormitting up to 36 dwell:iny units per
gross acre; and t2-.at subject r.equest is for ].2 dwellinq units per gross acro.
4. Tha~ the propo3ed recl~ssifi.cation of aubject pro~e.rhy is
iiec~ssary and/n.r desirable for. the ordQrly and proper deve7.npment of thR
community.
5. Tliat the proposed reclass.ification of subject property does
properly r.e'late to the zones and t}iefr permittQd use~ locally established in
close prox~mity to subject property and to thr~ zones and tztefr permitted uses
generally established khr~ugh~ut the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subjecG property requfres
the dedication an~ .improveme~zt of abutting streets in accor~ance with the
Circulation Elernent of the General Plan, due to tho anticipated increase in
r.raffic which wi],l be generated by L•he intensiEi.aation of land use.
t~ !.'I1NjJ,`~`
: i:
1.
~
;
~
~.
,.
-.:_~
;
;i
~
5." 4
,~;~; _ . __._._
~"'
, ~ ~ . ~/~~` . . . . ~..: y~15~~'~
~ A
, ..... . ,1:'~!rv4
~ ,, , . . ... ~ ' f ~ ~;'~
7. That twalve (12) peopla indicated ~heir piesencc~ at said public
hearing i~z opposiL•ion; and thaC na corrospondez~ce was received in oppas3t3on
to subject pe~ition.
~ALIFORN:.A ~t1VIRUNMEN!`AI,~~ALIT1.- A,CT FI~pIN~: Ttlat the Anahe3m City
Planning C'ommission has reviewed the proposal to r.eclassi~y subject pro ezt
from the RS-10,000 (RpsicionCial, Single-Family) Zon~ to ~he RMP3000
(Residential, Multiple-Far.iilyl (previously RM-12~0 •- Rasic~ential, Mul~iple
Farnily~ or a less intense zone with wa•l.vers of minimwn ~ite area per dwelling
unit, maximum s~ruc~ural hc~ight, minimum structural setback, miriimum '`,''~
recrea~i4na1/leisuro araa on an irreqularly-shaped parcel of land consistinq
of approximately 0.9 acxe having a fr.onGage of approxi.mately 165 feet on the '~
nortn sidP oL• North Street, hav3ng a maximum drxpth of approximatal~ 2~l6 feot,
bQing lar.ated approxa.mately 21~? feet east of the centerlina of Gido I,ane and
further c~escribed as 1305 and 1307 West North Street; and does hereby approve
the N~gative Aeclaration upan Einding rhat it has cc~nsid~red the NegaLive
Doclaration together with any comrnents recoived dur,i.ng thN ~ublic reviow
process and further finding cn i;he basi3 of the initial study and any commonts
received th,at thare is no subst:antial evidence tha~ the ~roject will have a
significant AEfect an r_hQ an~vxronment. -
NOTV~ THER~FORE, BF IT RESOLVED th~~t the Anaheim Ci~;y Planning
Co~mnission duss hereby grari~ subject Petitia~a £<~r Rer,las3i¢icat~.on and, by so
doing, that TiMl~ la-Zoning of the Anahe:.m t4unicipal Code be amended to
excZude' tli~ al~ovo-describeci prnperty from the RS-1Q,000 (Residential,
Single-I'~,mily) Zane and ~o incorporate said doscribed pr.operty into thP to the
RM-3U00 (Resident;ial, MultipXe-Family) Zone upon the following conditions
which are hpreby fnund to be u necessary +~reroquisiCe to the proposod use of
subject; propcarty :~n r,rdez• to preserva the safoty and general welft~re o£ the
Citiz~ns ~f the City o1` An~heim:
1. That L•he 1Qga'1 ownor of subject pr~perty ,1ha11 irze~~ocably ofF~r to
dsdicate to the Cit:y of Anaheim a srrip of land thir~y two (3?..) faet 3,n
width £rom the centerline ~f the street along Nurth Street for street
wic~ening purposes.
2. That streQt lighting facilzties along Norrh Streat ahall be xnst;allod as
required by the Utilit,ies Genaral Manaqar ixi accordance wi,th
specifications on file in the QEfice of Utflities General Manager; or
tk~aC security in t;ha form nt a bond, certi£icatW or deposit, letter oE
cred3t, or cash, in an am~ur.~, and ~orm satisfactory t~ the City of
Anaheim, shall be ~o~ted with the City to guaranGee ~he sarisfactor~•
complr~tion of th~ above-•mentioned i.mprovemer.~s. Sai.d sec~~•riky gh811 be
posteii wi~h th~e City oE Anaheim pri~r to the introfluction of an
ardinance rezoning ~ubject property, :Che above-required improvements
:~hall be installed prior to occu~ancy.~
3• 'Phat a Fae shall~ be paid to the City of Anaheim for treo planting along
North Stregt in an, amount as established by City Council resolution..
4. That grior to khe inkroduction of an ordinance rezoning aubject
property, Condition Nos. ~, 2 and 3, above-rr~entioned, shall bs
complet~d. Th~ provisions or rights grante6 by this resolution shall '~
becoma null and void by action of ~he Planning Commission unlass said `
condition9 are complied with within une (1) year frqm tho date of thi~
resolution o~ suGh further time a~ the Plr~nning Commissio~ may grant. '
-3- PC89-12~ '~
1 ." , ' ~ ~
. _::.:. .~.:. ,...-..~;:.. ~ , ..,~tr~..+., ti+1~7v ~ 1 u . .
....,N,~ ~~pli M, , r"~~qi d 1~^-,~~ ..
. . ~ ,1. . . . ~ . . , ~.~ i~~
. . . .. ;r .. , .. , .. . . ,~ ;i~,yt v i;i''„
~ ~Fat~ _
5• That a~proval of ~h9,s app~ication constitut:a:~ a
Pprov~l of the proposed
reqUeSti °~lx t° the extent thaL• it complie~ with the Anaheim MuniciQal
Zoning Code and an,y other applicable City regu.lat.ions.
not inc:l•.ide ~ny ar.tion or f3.nding~ as ta complianre or a roval c~f
request rogardin APproval does
~ a~y ~tllei applicable ordinanco P~ the
reqlzirement. . regulat3•~n or
BE IT FURTH~R RESOLVED that the Anaheim City pla~aa~in
does hereby find and determine that adflp~ion of this Resolution is ex ress
predi~cated upon a , ~J ~nm-nission
ppla.cant s compliance with each and a11 of ~Y~e conditin~s
hereinabove se~ forth. ;hauld an.y such conditions, o~ ~n ,,
declarod invalid ar unenforceabl~ bp LhQ final
comQetent jurisdiction, tlzc~n this Resolution, and 1ri y Pa.r ~hg~,~~£, be
containod, shal'1 be deemed nu11 and void. Jua~e~~ ~~ a~y coux•t o~
y aPFrava1s herein
TIiE FOREGt3TNG ItESOLUTIqN is sxqne~ an~ ap~,roved b~ me ~his gth ~a~,
oE May, 1989.
~~ ; ~
'" • M : . / , ~/~"//)/!~~.
~_--~.~-.~~~~ ~li.'_:'.__./ /~!~/~' ~"t''~'l'~'~
CHAIRWQMI~I1 f ~~EIM_ Ty ~p~~NIyG CCMMxSSIQ11
ATTEST: ~
~~= `=~
3ECRET,A~ty AN.AHEIM CLTY PLANNIN C SY~~N
STATE OF CALIFOkNIA ;
COUNTY 0~' ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAT3ETM )
~. EdiCh L. Harris,
Comm.i5sion, do hereby ~sxti~f Secretary c,f tkie Anzheim Cit
adopL•ed at a meetxx~q af the An he m CityEplannin ~ p~'~`~n~ng
9 5 reso.lution war~ pass~d and
1989, by the fol~ow3ns~ vote oi` the members ~he~.eOE Commissi~n lielcl on May 8,
AYES: CpMMISSTONERS: BOUAS, $ ~m
OYD.,_1JTI, CARUSILLO, FELDHAUS, I~IERHST;
NOESs MC BURNGY, MESS~
COhIIdTSSIONERS; NOIJE
ABSEt3T: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
19A4.
zN WITNESS WHEgEpF~ I hav~ hQreunto set my hand thi~ g~h da
y o f• May,
SECRETARY ~---'-`~~~~~~?
, ANAHETbf CITY piANNINv CQ~{TSSIQN
-4-
PC89-12~
'ri :vtt
. .~ ;',S'.iyr
~ . '..J.~}Pl
'~g~
,;.
';i~»~
,4
";
ii;l
`,:.;.i
~ ~~:?'~
'`;~
;°g
.; `
: i,