Resolution-PC 89-125~ ,..+
ia'y.~ s~ . . . , ,,.,t,~
y~ 1
±~
. ;i
'i
i
~~4.4 TION~Q ~.~~..2~~
~ A RLSOGUTTqN UF 'PHE ANAFTEII+f CI1~y pLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PET1':L'rON FOR CONDITIONAL USE PGRM11 N0, 3141 BE GRI~NTED, IN PA~T
W-IERFAS, L•he Anaheirn City Pl.anning Cnmmission did rQCeive a verifie2l
;,, Petition Eor Gaxiditiun~l Use Permit from ANAFiGIM REDEVGLCPM~NT AG.ENCX, A~TN:
+~ Tom Kupfrian, 300 5. Harbor Bpulevard, Sui.re AOQ, Anaheim, CA 92805, owner,
and DICK ENLO~ ANJ LAliREL ENLUE, 523 S. Lemon Street, An~heim, CA 92805,
~qents Por cert;ain roal propert;y si~uahed in the City ot Anaheim, County of
Oz•ange, 5ka~c~ of CaliCornia, c3ascribed as:
LOT 5 IN IILQCK "A" UF THF SUBBCVISION 0~ VIN~YARD LQT
D-3, '[N xHE CTTY OF ANAHEIM, COUN~Y ~F ORANG~, STATE
O[' ~'*.LIEURNTA, AS P5R MAp RECORDED IN BOOK 34~ PAGF
~92 OF UEF.DS, RECORAS OF LOS ArTGELES COiJN'.fY,
' C~LIHURNIA.
WEiEREAS, the City Planning Commis5ion did hold a pu'blic hearing at
the Civic Centor in tho City of Anaheim on Apri]. 10, 1989 at 1:30 p.m., notica
of said public hearing havinq been dulr gxven as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions af the AnahE~im Municipal CodQ, C.~,v.p~or 18.03,
to hear ancl consider evide:ice f~r. and ~gainst said proposed con~?.iti4nal use
permit an3 Co investig~te and make firiilings and recommQndation~ in c~nnection
ttierewitli; and said petition was continusd to the meeting of May 8, 1989; and
WFiEREA5, saiQ Commission, Aftc~r due inspgct3.on, invostigation ~nd
„ atudy madQ by itse].f and in its beha~F, and aPter dua considerati~n of al?
evidence and reports offared at said hQaring, does find and determine tho
fullowing £acts:
; 1. Thnt thc~ petstioner requests appr~val of a Conditional Use
Permit undar authority of California Government Cod~ Section 65852.1 to permit
the construchion of a 427 sq.rt. "granny" unit in conju~nction w3th the cnove-on
of a singlQ-famil,y rasi.dential structure wi.t:~ waive.r of the roilowing:
~A) SF(TI.QN~~$.~~G~4 0 - rtin"ta num_front y~.~,9~.~t~~k~
~-~.~~.'~,..4_.?4~4 (2~ ~~~, requirc~~: ~~f ~~ Proposed)
~ tB) ~E~TIQN~ 1~.2.f..U63.02Q - Minim~m~~~_y~r~_~~k~~k•
. .~n~~~.~!~y~2~ : 43Q
(C) ~~' ..~4N~~$~~~'.~U.~Q~4 - bl~nim..i~[n..x~zr ~.SS~ ~FLk1~~4~•
.d~~$.34.A20.,4~4 (12.,~eet reqiiired: 3 Feg~ Prapo~ed)
Z. Tha; th~r proposed use is hezeby granted pursuant lo Califor.nia
Gavernment Code SQCt•ion 65852.1.
3. That tho reques~Qd waivor (B~ is herQby dcr:ii~d on t:~e basis that
revfsed plc~ns ware submitted elimin^ting the tiead for suid waivctr.
, 0852z
yl~ PC89-125
i.i. .... . ... . . . .
i~ ..'rr .1. . . . ' ~ . ... , . . . ' . . . ~ . ~ . . , , ~ . ,'.i t 9i~t~il`i•9t W~tf~S~n~!
~~ . .. . . . . . , . . . . . . .. . . , ~ . , . ., , . . . . : •.~~
~ ~i
~. That the rQquesteci waivar on (A) and {C) are her~Y~y granted ori
the basis that th~re are special circiunstances appl3cablc~ to the graperty such
as si;,o, shape, ~opography, locatiori anu surroundings which do not apply to
otk~er iaen~ically :onec~ property in the same vicinityJ and that atr3ct
applicat~on of the 2onirig Code depr.ivos tho properLy oE ~ariviloges enjnyRd by
ot2:er propc~rti~:s in th~r 3.dantical zonQ and classiEicmtion in thA vicinity.
5. '~hat the proposQd use will not advers~ly affeet the adjoiniiig
land use3 and the g•rowth and dQVelopment of the area in 4r}iicY: it is proposed
t0 ~lf: ZUC~ti@C~.
6. That the sxze ancl shapQ o[ the site propased for the use is
adequate t~ allow the ~ul]..devalopm~nt of th~ pXOposed uae in a manner not
d~trimental to the particular area nor ro the peuce, health, safety nncl
general welfare of th~ Citizr~iis of the C.ity of Anaheim.
7. That- the granting of L•ho Condi~ional Use Permit undor the
con~itioiis imposed, if any, will not bo dotrimental ~o the peare, hea~th,
; safety and genexai welfare of ~he Citiz~ns of the City of Anehe3m.
o. Th~t ~.he ~raff.i~ gen~ra~ed by the 1>z•Upose~ use wiZl not impose
: a1 undue burden upon the streets t~nd higliways ~QSigned and impro~ved to carry
t?ia tr.affic in the aren.
9. That one inter~sted person indicat.ed her presence at safii
public hearing; an~' that no corresponc]ence was receivQd in oppositfc~ri to the
sub}~c~: per.ition.
SA~ I,, FQt'.~I~_ ENV7RQ T~'N~AL QgALITX AC7' INDTN~: That the Anaho.im
City Planning Commission has reviowed the proposal ko permit the consCruchion
o£ a 427 squ~ro-foot "gi~anny" unit in conju:iction with the move-on o~ a
single-famil.y st;ruct~ure with wa3.vers of mznimum frant yard setback, mia3mum
side yar.d setback and miri3mum rear yard setback on n rectangularly-st~apecl
parasl of land consistiny oE approximatoly 8,107 (previoiisly 5,376) sqvar.P
foaC located at the southeast corner oE ry~ress ~traet and Philadelphia
6traet, and f:~rther deacciLed as 3Q2 F;~st Cyprsss Street; ~,nd doen herehy
approve the tiegative Dac:.~rat-ion upon findinq L•hat it has considerad the
Negative Aer.laration togEL-har with ~ny comments received during th~ pubYic:
review process and furthPr finclir~g o:l the basis of the initial stu~y ~an~'i any
~omments rer.eivecl that ihere is no subsranCial evidence that tha pr.uject will
tiav~ a significai~,t effert on ~hQ environmen~.
NOW, THEREFOl2E, IIE IT RESOLVED t}iat the Anaheim City Planninq
Commission does hPreby gr.ant s~bjoct Petition for Conditaonal Use Permit,
ugon the following concli~ions which are hereby found to be a nocASSary
prerc~qui~ite to ~he proposed usc: of tho subject pxoperty in order to preserve
th~ gaf.ety anc~ genera] walfare of thQ Citizer.s of the City of Anaheimt
1. Tk-at prior ta is~uaace of a bv.ilding permit, the appropriato traffic
sfgnal assessment fee shall bo paici to t2ie Citx of Anaheim i;S ai~ smotint
as eAt~sblishQtl by Clky Council reso,ution.
-2" PC8^-125
~ . . , i ~ .,.~.i ~if,''t,'a , , ~ .,. ,. . .
, ' r~~r
~::%;h _
F'
2. That the legal ocan~r o~ subjec~ property s2aa11 irrevocably offer ro
dedicate to the City aF Anah6im a~t•rip o~ land thir~ty (30) fee~ in w3dL•h
Eran tkio cent•erlina oE the street 1]ong Cvpress and Philadetphitt Streets
including a fiftoQn (15) foot radius corner return Eor street widening
pt~rposes .
3. xhar a cash payment sha11 bo maae to the City of Anaheim for the cost of
the removal of oxistizig street improvements along C ress and
Philadelphia Stroets and reconstruction/construc~ion oE ull street
improvement~ at Che ultimate location, Said paymenC shall be made prlar
to iss~iance cf a building pRrmzt.
4• That a ro] ~•_up garago door shal]. be instal.led ~snd maintained.
5. That subject: propc~rty shall be served b~ underground u~il3t;ies,
6. That streel: lightinc~ facilities along Cypress and Philadelphia Streets
shall be inst~lled as required by the LTti].ities Geiieral Manager in
accordancp with specifications on iilr~ in +
Manager; ~r r_hat security in the form of a bond,lc e tificatQtofsdeposit1
lotter o£ crodit, or cash, in an amou.nt and for.m satisfackory to the City
of Anaheim, shall be poste~ with the City t~o g4~rantee the satisfbctory
camplotioxi of ttie abnvQ••mQnY.icnod improvement•s. Said security ;~•:dll be
posted with khe Cit;y of Anaheim prior ~o iasuance of a buildi.nq pQrmit L•o
guarr~nt~e 3.nstallation prior to ocaupanay.
7. T~at a~ee sha11 be paid to the City o~ Anahei.m for tree p~.anting alonq
Cypre~s ar..9 Philadel.ph.ia Sc:reets in an amounr. as established by City
Cu~incil res~lution.
a. Tha~ prior ko is3uance of a buildinq ~ermi't, appioprfate pt,rk and
rocreation in-lic~u fees shall be gaid to Che City of Anaheim in an a~nount
as d~termined by L•he City Cauncil.
9. Tha~ a11 mir conditioning fflcilitie:~ ~r.d otht~r roof t~nd ground mounted
equ;i»menC shall be properly shielded ~rom view, and the soun3 bufE'ered
from adjacent re;,identi;~l propar~ie.3.
1U. ThaC prior to issuaneo of a building p~rmat, avidence shall be prh~ented
satisfactory ~o the Huildiny Division t•h~h the proposed projc~ct a.s i.n
confarrnance with ~ouncil Policy N~~ntbar 542 "Sound Attenuation ~n
Residential Projects" and with 2~oise Insulati~n Standards speci:ied .in
the Califoc•n;a Admini.strative Ced~, Tit1a 2,.
?.l. That the legal ownor of subjec;t pr~yperty shr~Il restrict the occ~~.
the granny unit to one (1) ~r two (2) adults, both of whom ara sixtnCy of
years of age or older, anci furCharmqre, ohall record a r,ovenant nqainst
L•he property so .re~tricti.ng the ~~ccupai-cy of said unit. Said covonant
shalt, be submitted L•o the Zoninq Uivision for transmittal to th~ City
Attorney'4 Offi~e Eor review and ap~roval prior to recordation. Proo[ of
recordation sha11 then brs submiL-Ced to the ?.nn.ing Div;sion.
-3-
PC89-125
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~~ ' . '~`f~;
I . ~ ~ ~ .. ~ `'a
12. Tht~t a~ot Lane Adjustment Lo record tho con.Eigurat3.on oE 3ubjeat
nroparty, ae sJlown on Revx.sion No. 1 of Exhib:it No. 1, sht~11 be submitted
t~ and approved by ~he CiCy uf An~theim and then be rACOxdod in the office
of the ~lrange Courity Reeo:.c]er.
1~. That subjecL• property ;~h~l~ be developed subst.antially in accorc1anc:e writh
plans and specifications ~n filg with the City o~ Anaheim marked Revzsion
No, 1 of Exhibit Kos. 1 through 5.
14. That pri~~r• ta issuance of a building ~ermit, or uithin a period oE orae
(1) yAar from the date o.t Lhis resolution, whichever occurs first,
Condi~ion Nus. 1, ?., 3, 6, 7, a, 10, 11 ~nd 12, ak~ove-menL•ioned, shall be
cflmplied w;th. F;u.tensions Eor further time ta complet~ said conditians
may be grantsd in accordanco with Section 18.03,090 of the Anaheim
Mvnicipal Cocie.
15. ~hat prior to final bui.tdinu and zonrng inapoct3.ons, Condition Nos. 4, 5,
6, 9 a.1d "J_3 ubove-mentior.,~d, shRll be complied witt,.
16. That approval of thi~ appl3.ca;:ion cansL•itutAs approval of the pr~posed
rc~quest o:.~y to ~he extent :hat it complies with the Anaheim Municipal
~oning Code and any othei• applicabte City regulatioYis. Approval doe~ not
.incl.ude any aataoa~ c; t'iadings as to complianr,o or approval o~ the
request regarding any other applicab].e ordinance, regulation or
roquiramenL.
B~ IT F'URT:,ER RESOLVF~ that zne wnaheim Citiy PlanniY-g ~'ommission
dr~ss hereby find anri der.errnine that adopL-~.an of ~his Itc~soi+~~3~~1~ is exprossly
~~redicated upon applicant'a compliance w~*.?~ e~cn and all o[ tbe co~adi~iong
hE~reinabove set forth. Shou>>? o~,y such c~nditions, or any pnrt thereof, be
d~clarc~d invalid n: unenfarceable by tha final judgrr~ent :,f any cpurt of
competent jurisdiction, then this ~teso.lu~iun, and ~ny ~y~pruvals herein
coYitn.~ned, shall bc~ dcomed nuil and vbi3.
7'HE FORE^OTNG kESOLUT'IQN i5 ~:~ ;:,~ru artc~ aQprovecl by mt~ this 8th ~ay
of rSay, '1~389.
, ~~
' ~%;/ / ,,.: ,,.
_.._...~: l~ ~'•G~1. ' '~ , / i i(' ;•~ ll~'i
-~--+.L~-.L:_..- .
CHAII2WOM AN'AHFIM CT'YY PT~h.ii;'vItl(i COMMISSION
~,
AT'iEST: ~7
- ~Q14.~'`~"~ .~~ ~/-~~!./C-~
~F.CRETAFY, ANA.`iEIM C:LTY PL:-NNING COt~SISSIUN
'4" PC89-125
?"14..~1'~~^'dVT i,.;.~".. ..,~,. . .. . . . ., ~
~, .
....;.., ,~1. ~.. ,;.~ ~ '/+4,i'~`-+ ~~M1~rr~~~l /"xY~'1.a`i' ~ .' ' _
., , .,~ .t , ~~ ,.~ ,~ , ...~ , . »,~ ,~,yr ~'eiT''~,s.ft+x
, , ~ fi~~ _ . ..
S:PATE OF CALIFORNIA )
G'Ot1N'.~Y QF ORANG~ ) ss.
CTTY OF ANAI~TEIM )
I. Erlith L, Hdrris, Seccetary o~ tlie ~iahoim C3ry Planning
Commission, do heroby certiEy tha~ the fore oin rt~~
adopted at t~ mee~ing nf the Anah~im Ci~y P1 nni g Comm ssion hdldponsMay~B,~
19~9• by t}ie fo].lowing voL•o of. the mernbQr3 thereof s
AYES: CQMM:ISSIONFRS; BOUAS, E10yDgTUN, CARUSILLO, F~LDHA,US, H~ftBS'r,
NOES: COMMISSI~N~RS: NONE~R~~Y~ ~`'~ESSE
ABSENT: COhAlISS:CONFRS: NONE
IN WITNCSS WF~EREOF, I have hareunto set my hand this i3th ri~Y a£ May~
1989.
`'C.d '
~`~" • ' -~ '" ~'l-'L.~'~_
SECRETARY, A1~IAFiEIM GITY PLANIdING COMMT5SION
-5-
PC89-125