Resolution-PC 89-128~
"t'~7`.',r
~;~
RE~.2.4~9~~`!4~@2 -x a e
A. RESOLUTION OE' THE ANAHEIM CIZ'Y PLANNING CQMhSISSION
TIiAT PETITION FOR 'VARIANC~ N0. 3908 BE GRAN'rEI7
WHEREAS, tho Ana2~Rim City PlAnning Cnmmission did roceiv~ a vc~rifiHd
~ Pc~~ition for Variance from CARL 2ABY, 444 W. Katalla Avenue, Anahein-, CA
92802, owner, und JAMES YQWELL, 350 W, Katella Avenue, 3~na2i¢~im, CA 92802,
agent, of certain real pxapert~y s.ituaL•od in the Ci.ty uE ~nah.~im, C~unty r.E
Orange, St4te of CaliEornia doscribed as:
THAT PORTION OF THF: NUf2THWCST QiJAT.<TER nF TIiL
NORTHEAST QUARTER OI' SECTION 27, TOWN~SHIP 4 SOU'~H,
RANGH 10 WGST, IN THE RANCHO SI~N JUAN CAJUN DE SANTA,
ANA, IN THG CI1'Y OF ANAEiBIM, COUNTY OF' ORANGE, S7.'ATE
GF CALIFURNIA, AS SEIOWN ON A MAP RECOEtDED IN BOOK 51,
PAG~ 10 OF MISCELLI~NEOUS MAPS, RECGRD,r, OF Oi~I~NGE
COUNTY, CALIFOL211IA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
RFGINNINC AT A PUINT iN THE NO~2THEFtLY LINE OF SAID•
NQRTHEAST QUARTER DIS~AI3T NORTH 89 DEG. 54' 30" EAST'
890.00 FEF.T FROM THE NORTFIWEST CORNER OI' SAIC~
NORTHEAST QUA'r?Z'FR; ThENCR ALQNG SAIa NORTHERLY LINE;
NORTH 8U DEG. 54' 30" EAST. 227.80 FEET TO TI~IE:
NOR.THWEST CORNER OF THE LAND llESCRI:BFD IN bEED TG
ANG~LO ZABY AND CARL ZABY RECORUEb JL'LY 27, 1962 Irf
BOOK 6192, PAGE 727 OC OF~ICIAL REf:ORDS OF SAII-
ORANGF COUNTY; THElTCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAII1
ZABY LAND, SO-lTH O1 'JEG. 21' 00" EAST TO A LINE:
PARAI~I.~L WITH AND SOUTFiBRLY 265.00 FEET FItOM SAII)
NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LIt1E SGIJTii
; 09 D~G. 54' 30" WEST 227.80 FEET TO A LI:IE THA'~ BEARIi
SOUTH G1 AE:C. 21' 00" EAST ~'ROM THE POTN~' Ol?
BEGINNING; TIiRNCE t70RTH U1 DGG. 21' Ob" WEST '165.Q~5
E'EET TO TiiE POINT OF Se.G:[NNING.
WHEREAS, tht~ City Planning Commis3ion c9id hold a public hearinq ~t
the Civic Canter in tho City of An:,heim on Msy 8, ~989, at 1z30 p.rn., no~ice
of said public heari:.q having be~n ciuly given as raguirecl by Iaw and in
acr.ordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to laear and considar evidence for and a•~ainst said propo~ed variance and to
investigate and mv.ke findinqs and rQCOmmendations in connoction therewith; and
^
" WHCREAS, said Commiasion, after due inspoction, in~~estigatio;: and
study mado by itself antl in iks bohal~, and ~xftar due con~idezaCfon a£ all
avidence and reports o~Eered at s~.td hear.ing, does find and determinr, the
followinq facts:
0855r
-1-
PC89-128
_r'
~:i
. . . . .. ,.. ~ , . .r~.r.'t~.~~ ~ 1 %.i~::.~ v~~ d 1
1.~';.,1 ~ ~y514f~1
a;.s,:~; ~ 1I~~?f`" ~^'~s?y, dd
* ~ , '~ ~rctih. ~ '. ~;''`'~i
. I , . . ~r,1~
1. That the petitionar requests waiyer of tha fo21ow1nq to I
four froest~nc~in,q signs: .~tain '"''
~A) ,~~~~.~QN,~.~~Q.~"~,Q~ - MaxiM~, nura -
.~.~8.48 Q.~'1..Q_~Q k~9~ 9-~--€.~'ee enc~ima Qta~.
~~~ian parmitted; 4 ~c r~, c~xis~inq)
t~~ ~~~T~O~~.~4.~.~.~73~, - ni
~.__' mu-.-~3~~~.~..~2etw-eet1.~~~~1~in.~gll;a ~
~d x-.~-4~.~R7_,~~ ~~Q~,f~~ iequirec~; ~
I•, existing) 'z`_'3'Q~-~L~- 7,~Q_,__f~
(C) ~~TIONS 19.p5 091i~ _ n
~n_~.~.~0~7~ ~ ~`~-~~~~~.g~freesta•n ~na sa
~Q .~-~-.~.4P~~X.--~~.5.. '.crns
~.~~~ revuired to east and weat prop~rty
.lines. 20, 29 an~ ~3 fee . existingt anc3 ~2,
.~.~~, regu.ired to south proporty line, 50 f~
,~ existing)
Z. Thn~ the abovo-metit:ioned waivers are horeb
:; triat tharo axe spec:ial circumstancc~s ar~plicable to the pr pR t,y such as sizes
: shape, topography, location and surr.ound.ings wl~3ch do not a 1
; identically zor,ed prop~rty in thw samr~ v.icinit pp y tO ath8x
^? oF tho Zoning Code de riv, s thA Y% and that strict applicati~r~
~
propert.tes an the ic;entical zozie and classif.ic t r~nrin thegv~cinityed ~Y °ther
3• rhat the existing si.gns are intended t~ provtd~ :.nfoz~matfon on
` sorvicQS and prices Lo tha car wash customers And not to 2ttract Che travelin
, public.
' 9
~ 4• That t.hd pr~posed variance is heroby gx•~n~ea for a
~wO ~ 2 ~ Y@ax::. to t;erminate on June 30, 1991, upon te~rmination aE t~ ee curr ent
lease on the prc;L ertr~.
~ 5. That the:o nrR exceprional or Qxt~rsordinary cirr,umg~nnCeB ar
7 conditions applir.abie to r.ho proporty involved or to the inL•c3aded usQ of the
property that do not apply qener~-lly Lo tho property nr class of use ia the
srune vicin~ty and zone.
6. ThaC L•hc ro~uestod variance ia r~ecessary fqr th~ preservation
and enjoyment of a r~ubstar~tial properhy right possessed by otYier
~ the samQ vzcinity and zono, and denied to L•he propert iri property in
Y q4oetian.
7. That the requeslr.ed variance will not be matoriaZly detrimanta2
to the publiC welfare or injurious ~o the property or improvement~ in sucla
vics.nicy anc3 zone in which t;he i~roperty fs ~ucated.
8. Thak ao one indicated their presenca at s~id public hearing i~
~ppogition; and that no correspaudence Nas rKCeived in opposftion to subjer.t
petition.
~ -~L~FORNIA EN~7~4~.~~~Q~
Uirector or his authorizod re resc~.ntat ~~ra~~~~~~~i Trle P1ann.ing
project falls withfn the clefinition ot• Categor cel rExQmptions~ Clnas rll~sas
defined in the State EZR Guidelines an.d in, ~I;orefore, aategorically exempt
from t~ie requirement to prepare An EIR.
.~_
PC89-•128
~rrs~ e~h~~:,;w~:.~,.,,,,.
,~ , ,
~:~;.
~
,,. .,
;
<<,,,~
- ,;a,,a
,;,
,;~,
:s
~ ~ ~':~i
N~W, THEPEF()RE, BG IT FESOLVED that ~tho Anaheim City Flanning
Commfssion does hereby grant subject Petitia~n fo_ Variance, upon, the
Eollowiiig conditinns wtiich ar~ horeby foun~ to be a necessary pr9requ3site to
the propqsed use of the subjec~ pr~per~y in order to preserve ~'.e sa£eCy ~nd
qeneral wel£aro nf the Citiaens ot ~he City af Ana:aeim:
1. That damac~ed anrl/or hazardnus sir~ewalks shall be rega:red along Katel'la
Avanue as required by the City F.ngineer and :in accox~aucQ witk~ stands~rd
p1an~ and spaci~icationa on file iu the Office nf the Cit, EnginePr.
2. ThaL• th~ dritreway on hrsrella Avonue snal.l be reconstructed to
acc~mmodaf:Q ter- (lq) fooC radius cur.b returns. Lxisting Ureken ar
cracked driveways shall be i•emoved and rQplaced as required by tk~o City
Enqine~z.
~. That, as requirad by t;he City Traffic Engineer, the sign closear to
Katella Avenue shal'1 bo:
(a) Located at least seven (7) feet bQhind Lhe public atreet
right-of-way; or
(b) The lowest F~ortion ok said sign shall be a mirximum of e.ight (Sj
;Ceel- above the fini.sh~c~ qrade; or
(c) The maximum overall height ~lxall not exc~ed two (~) Eeet.
4. Trat a f~e sha17. be pai3 to the City of Anahoim for strAet lighting
along Kntalla Avanue in an ~mount as F~stablished by City Council
rasolution,
5. That: tha legal ownor of subject propQrty shall ~urnish the City af
Anahei.m with an agrAOment, in a form ap~xoved by ~he ~'ity Attorney,
wherein such owner agzRes t~ remove the four (4) ~igns specifi.cal7.y
approvod ir. ~onnoctiou Nith subject vr.riance at his/her expensa if such
rem~val is requir.ecl by the City~ of A.iaheim t~s a result of amc~ndment to
the Anaheim Municipal roge modifyiny permikkea business siqnaye i.n thQ
~R "Commercial, Racreation" Zono (for i:iatancR, to prohibiL• suah
signs). Said agreemeiat sha11 be recorded in the Office oF the Orange
County Re~urder and a copy of the recor~ad agreemont shall ~hen be
submitr~d co the Zoning Division.
6. That the ~wner of subject property shall submiL• a YeCter rgqueatibg
termination ot Conc~itional Use Permit No. 757 to the Zoning Division.
7. That subjact property sha11 be dQVeloped, substantia].ly ir. acc:Ardance
with plans and s~,ecific~tions on file with Che City af Anaheim markdCi
Exhibit ?IOS, 1 and 2.
8. Ti~ai. C.cndition Noa. 1 th.rough 7, t~bove•-mentioned, shall be complete8
within ~a pQriod of ninety (90) fl~ys fxom thR date of this rRSOlution.
9. That, this vaciance s}sall terminate on ~Tune 30, 1991, upon t~arm3natfon of
khe curre~nt lease on ttie property.
-3-
r~.~ ... ::;s 1~ =;;t~~~~~
PCBB-128
_. ;
i
;r
.:~4a:JN1111
~,YA~4~
10. Tna~ ~+~proval of tkiis applic~tion consC3tu~es ~pproval of the propos9d
request only to tlie extent that it complios with tha :~n,aheim Municxpal
7,oniti.g Co~e and any other appliaable City regu.lntiuna. Appraval c1oas
not include any action or L•indings as to complzance or a~proval of the
request regarcling t~ny other applicable ord.inance, reyulati.on or
r sqi~i rement .
BF IT FURTEIER RESOLVED that the l~naheim City Plannir~g Commission
CIOQS heroby Einc~ and dQtermine that aciopti~n ~f this ltesolui:ian i~ expressly
predicated upon app]ican~t's campli~nce with ebch rznd all af the conditions
herein~bove set Eorth, Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, ba
declared invalid ~r unonforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisilictiou, ther~ ~this Resolution, and any approvals herein
containecl, shall be deemed nu11 ~z-d void.
THF~ FOREGOING RLSOLUTION is signed and n~prove~3 by tae this 8th day
of May, 1989.
__._._.~ "._..~ :.c~._> ~%~ / t'~:.• ,~~,_
--r-- - - ~
CAA7T2WOMAFI,,' ANAXiETM CITY. PLANNTNG COI~AMISSION
ATTEST:
..._ _. •~~l~ .
SECR~lAR , ANAHEIM CIT'f PLANNING CUt~fI5SIG11
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
CQUNTY ~F ORA.ti'~E ) g~ ,
CITX Or A27ATiEIM }
I, Edith L. Harria, Secretary of tha Anaheim City plannix~g
Commission, do h~ereby certify that thca foregoing resolution was passed and
ado~~taQ r~t a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Cammissi.on he.id nn May 8,
1989, by the follnwing vot~ of the membors ther~of:
AYES: C~MMTSSIONERSt BOUAS, aOYDSTUN, CANliSIL[.0, FELDHAU5, HERBST,
MC BURNBY, MESSF
NOES: COMMTSSI~IN~RS: NQNF
ABSElIT: (;02~lMtSSIC1~IERS: NONL•'
IN WITNESS WfiEREqF, I hava haro+znto set my hand this 8th day o~ May,
1989.
~ ` ~ ~
_~_...._ ' .__._ .r. ~, .~ i
SECRETA,RX, A.NAH~IM CITX PLANNTr1G CO:N(MISSION
-4-
PC83-128
~`V
~ (?.i
+~
~~: i
~;,;i
ti
~.
;
t~?
', ,<
, .;;,
rr
:,
, :~
!