Resolution-PC 89-135~
,~.}' ~ ~ ~ j1An ~~~
~
XtE~41.~~1TI~LN~. PC 89-Y35
A RES~LUTION UF THE ANAHEYM CITY pLANNTNC COh4~SISSION
THAT PE:T~x'ION F'OR RECLASSIFTC.ATION N0. Fi8-8g_42 Hk~ GRAN~gp
WHEREAS, tlio Anahoim Clty Planniny Commission dia rac~ive a
verified petition for Reclas~ificati~n Prom EDGA ENTERPRISES, A GENERAL
'~ PARTNERSHTP, Attnc Les L~aerer, 19g0 Wostwood B1vd., 3rd El~ar, L~os Anc~eles,
,~ CA 90025-4614, owner, and LOARA HIGFI SCHOOL BAND BOqSTER5, INC., 1765 W.
Cerritos Avenuo, Anatieim~ CA 92802, z~g~nr, for certain real pro,perty si~uated
in the City cf Anaheim, County of r~range, Si:~te of California, doscribod as
follows:
1HAT PORTTp*1 OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF TF~E
h'URTHWRST QUART.FK OF S~CTION 23, TOWNSIiTP 4 54UTH,
RANGE 10 W~ST, IN THE RANCHO SI+N JUAN CAJON DE SANTA
ANA, AS SHOWN Ot7 A MAP RECORDEA IN BOUK 51, PAGE YO
~ OF MISCELLANL•'QUS MAP~ IN THE OFFICE OF THE COU~ITY
i RECORDEF~ OF SAIU COUNTY, llE;SCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE IN'?'ERSE~TION OF THE ~ENT~F LINE OF
CERRITOS STREET AND THE CENTCR LII3E OF U.a. HIGHWAY
101 (LOS )~PTGGLES STI;EET), AS SAID :CNTERSECxION IS
SHO!dPT ON A MAP F:[LED TN BOOK 35, PAGE 39, OF RECORD
OF SURVEYS IN TFiE OFFICE OF THE Cf1UNTF RECORDEP. OF
SAID COUNTY, TH~tv*CE NORTH 6 DEGREES 55' 00" WEST
~21.6r FEET; THCt7CE EAST 300.3" FEET, PARALLEL WITH
TIiE CErITER LINE OE' C~RRITOS S'PREET; THENCE S~UTH
220.00 FEET TO THE ~EN:fER L7NE OF CERRITOS STREET;
TFiFNCE WEST SOUTIi 220.00 FERT TO TH~ CGNTER LINE OF'
C~RRITOS STREI;Tf rHENCE WE5T 273.58 FEET ALONG SAID
CENxER L7NE TO THE POl'NT ~JF BEGINNTNG.
EXCEI~T THAT PORTI027 THEHEOF L7CING WCSTERLY OF TCiE
FOLLOWIt7G bESCRIBED LIN~:
BE:GINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHEASTF,RLY
LINE 0~' THAT CERTAIN STRTP OF LAND 60.00 FEET JN
WTDTH, DESCRII~ED IN THF: U~ED TO TFIE uTATS OF
~: CALIFORNIA., RECORDED JUL'Y 10, 1914 IN BOOK 258, PAGE
66 OF' DEEDS, WITH THE CENTEF. LINE OF SAID CERRITOS
j AVENUE; SAID INTERSECTION BBING ON A CUEtVF, CONCAVE
WF.:STE~RLY, HAVING A RI~LIYUS Oc^ G30.OG F~E~; THENCE
NOkTt~ERLY ALQNG SAID CURV~ TO ALINE PA12AL' LEL WITH AND
~' NORTHF.RLY 20.00 FEET E'ROM T.FIB CENTrR LINE AF SAID
CEt2RITOS AVENUE, A RI~DIAL LINE THTtOUGFi SAID POIZiT
BEARS NORTH 82 DGGRFES 54' 41" EASTf THENCE
CONTINUTNG AL~:JG SAID CURV~, 50.81 FEET THROUCH A
CENTR1tL ANGI.E Q~ 4 DEGREES 37' 14" TO THE SOUTIiERLY
C~RNER OF GAND DESCRTAED IN TfiE DEEU TO THE S'.fAT~: OF
GALIFORNZA, REi:ARDED APRIL 13, 1929 IN DOOiC 257, PAG~
962 OE' OrFICIAL RECGRAS; THENCE N4RTH 6 DEGREES 55'
' 00" W~ST ALOtIG TfiE EAST~FtLX LINE OF SAID I.AND OF THE
'^ STATE OF CALICORNIA, TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID
; LAND AROVk; DESCRIBED.
,,
r' ( 2 r
-1-
PC89-135
fY4Y.e
~ '~ 1
'AFiEREAS, tha Ci~y Planning Commission c~i.a hold a publfc hearinq
at tYie Civi~ Center in L•he City of. Anaheim un February 27, 1985 at 1:3U p.m.,
notice o[ saicl publ ic hQnring hzvinq bAen iiuly given ~is required by 1aw and i.i
accordancc~ with the pr.ovisions of the Anaheim Municipol Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and c.onsider c~vitlence for and against said proposed rer,lassification
and l.o inves~iqate and make findings and racommendatiuns in connec~i.on
therewith; and said pei:it3on was continued ~t~o the meetiz~gs of April 24, 1.989
and May 8, 1989; and
WFIEREAS, said Commiss•Ion, after due inspection, iiive$tigation
and ~tudy mads by itsel£ and in its behal~, an~ rafter due consideration oi all
evidence and rapurts of.ferec] at said $t33ring, does find and detexmine the
fol].owing facts:
1. '~hat th~ petitio:ier proposes reclassificati~n oF subject
property from thb ML (Limited Industrial) Zane to the CL (Commercial, Lim.ited)
or a less intense zone.
2. That the Anak~eim General P1an designatey subject prap~rty
for Gen~:ral Cammercial ].and uses.
3. That the proposed recJ.assification of subjact pruperty is
necessary and/or ~esirak~lQ £or L•he orderlv and p:•oper development of Che
community.
4. Th~.st the proposed rec].assiFicatio•a of subject property doas
properly relate to the zones and L•}ieir pormitted u:as locally establishod in
close proxim5.ky ro s~ibject property and to the zonos and their p~rmittad uses
generally est-ablished throuqhout th~~ comrr:unity.
5. That no one indicatad thexr prosence at said pu'vli~ hearing
in oppositioni Chat twenty (20) people inclicated their presence in fr~vor of
the request; ancl that uc, correspcndence was received in oppositaou to suk~ject
petition.
~LIFORNIA ENV7RON~fE,.~,I 'AL dTJ~i ~C ~T~~~IN,~: That the Anaheim
City Planning Commission has reviQwefl ttie proposal k~ raclassify eubject
nro~erty fram ML (Limited Induskriul} Zone ta the CL {Commercial, L3mited)
Zone and to waivo minimum number of parkinc~ spaces allow bir.~o operataons in
ar. existing entRrtainmon~ facility for teenaqars on an irrPgularly- shaped
parcel of land consi~ting r~f approximntely 0.15 acre locatafl :it th~ nartheast
corner of. Corritos Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard, and further c~ascribed as
'1490 SouL•h Anah+eim RoulRVai~c1 (Zzap - Thc~ NighCclub); and does herebX approvo
tho Negative Declaration upoci finding t}iai: it has considered th~ Negative
Declaration together wit•h any comments recaivod ~iuring tha public :eview
pro~oss an3 :~urtkier tinditig on the basis o£ the initxal ~LUdy and any
commanta received tht+t ther4 is no substantial Qvidenco that the project will
have a significant offect on ~~he environment.
-?.- PC89 -135
;,~ ;
~ ';,~
': ~;
I
;'~
'!
y~'.
il'~
1
~ '
j ,~ t.
~~
~t`r! ~
~ ~ ;;~~~
x~~ ~r-.~,-.
, , .
l~~~
~ - , ~ la ;r~~,~f
~. ~ . i ~q \~Y~~
~ },},
~ '
° ;s
'.~
~ ~~~,~
NOW, THEREFOR~, Bks T1' RESQLVED that tho Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant sub;jeLt Petition f:or REClassification a~id, bp so
cJ.oing, that Tit1e 19•-Zrning of the 1~naheim Munici.pal Gode be amended to ;,;f
excludP tha above-de3cribed property from the ML (Limitad Industrial) Zone
and to incarparat~ said described property inta the the CL (Cornmercia~, '`'1
~ ~ •;-i
I,imi~ed) Zone. :
B~ it further resolved that appcoval af L-h1s applica~ion const~itutes approval
of. the proposed requost only to ~he extenC tY~nL it camplies with the AYiahaim
Municipal Zoning Code and any othor applicable City regulations. Approval
does not include any action or fznding~ as to compi.iancQ or a~prov3l of the
requosL- regarding any other applicable r~rdi.aance, requlation or requirement.
F3F IT B'URTHER RESOLVED tha~. the Anahei,~ Ca.ty Planning Commission
does hereby find and determine that adoption oL this R~solu~ion is axpressly
predzcatpd upon applicant's compliancQ with ear.h and all of the conclitions
hereinabove set forth. Sho~:1d any such c~nditians, o,r any part Cherc~of, be
declared invalid or unentoxceable by tlze final judqment of any court of
cpmpatent jurisdiction, thQn this Resolutiun, and any app.raval5 herein
contained, shall be deomed null and void,
THE FnREGGING R~50LUTTON is signed and approved b,y me this 8th day
of May, 19E3y.
' i;'!t'',-~..~1- /{:., .ic!/r"a_~:.,~;~.
CAAtRPiOk~N, ANAHEIM CtTY PLA~TNING COMMISSION
v'
ATTEST: ~ , .
~-
P d~-~-~.~ ~ _~
SECRETARY, ANAIiEIM CfTY PLANNZNG COMMISSION
~TATE OF CALIFORPTIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CI'PY OF ANIIHEIM )
I, EdiC2a L. Harris, SQCrt~tary of the Anaheim Ci~y PZanniny
Co~runis~ion, do hereby cortify thaC ~Yxe Eoregoing rosolution was pas~ecl a;nd
~-dupted ar a meeting of the Anaheim Cicy Planninc~ ~ommission hel~. on uay i3,
7.969, by the following vote o~ the members thar4of:
AYES: ~OMMISSlONERS: BOUAS, BOXDSTUN, CARUSILLO, HERB5T, MESSE
WOES: COMM2CSIONER5: ~10DIE
ABSENT: COMMTSSIONERS: FELDHAUS~ MC F3URNEY
X989.
IN WITtJESS WHEREOF, I have hQreunto set my hand this 8th. day of May,
_ ~.1~i1~i_ ~,~ N~'~~v~.,~^'°~
S~CR~TARY, ANAHETM CzT'Y PLANNII3G CAMMISSION
1F'.
~~{'
=k~:~:;,
-3-
PC89-135