Resolution-PC 89-140~. .. , e. ~. ' ~ i ~~ ~,r:;, f~~~" ~~~~;'. ~ ri:i
~ ,~ta~:r~ /~ti~' '!
. ~ i
R~F.~QL~I~l ~._.NQ,~?C09-].40
A RESOLUTION OE' TH~ ANI~H~IM CITY PLANNING CC1t~ISSION
TfiAT PETITION FOR R~::LASSIFICATION N0. 8Q•-89-56 HE GRANTED
WH~R'EAS, tho Anaheim City Plnnn3ng Commi.ssion did receive a
veriii.ed peLition for Roclasssfination from ST~A5H MOMENY, 2002 c3~tsin.es~ Cen~er
Drive. Anaheim, CA 92807, owner, aizd MICHA~L FRAZX~R, 18200 Yartsa Linda,
Suite 201, Yorba i~~.ndfl, CA 92ti86, ag~nt for cerrain real pcoper~,•~ situatecl in
the City of AnahQim, County of Orange, State of. C~lifornia doscribe.° as:
THE WEST ON~-HALF, MGASURBD AL,ONG THE SOUTH LINE OF
LOT 21, OF 1'FtACT 743, IN T1H~ CITY OF ANAH~IM, COUNTY
OF ORANGE~ STATE OI' CAL:[~ORNIA, AS SHOWN Ol3 A MAP
RECOItDFD IN BOOIC 2'l PAGF. 10 OI' MISCELLANEOUS biAPS,
RECORDS OF ORANGE CUiJPiTY, CALIFORNIT..
WHEREAS, the Gity Planning Commission did hold a pub'lic hearin~
a~ the Civic CeY-ter in the Cit~~ of Anahe.im on May 22, ~.989 at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said ~~iblic hearing havincr besn duly given as re~ixir.ed by l~w and in
accordance with the provisions oP the Anaheirn Municipal Cocle. Chapter. 18.03,
to hear ~nd cons;i.der evi.clonce for ~,n~ agaix~st said proposEid reclassiFication
and ta inve::tig~te and m~ke findings and recammendati~~n~ in cotinection
therewith; anu
WHEREAS, said Commxssion, a~:ter due inspection, investigation
and study mada by itsal~ ancl in its behalf, and aftt~r due consideration of, all
evidenc.Q a~id reports offerr~d at ~aid hearirig, does find and detQrmine the
following facts:
1. That tho pc~titioner pro~oaes rer.lassi£icat3.on of subje~Gt
pro~E~rty from the RS-A-•43.~00 (Residentir.l/Agric~:itural) ZonQ to the RM-].200
(Residential, Mult:iple-Family) Zone.
2. Th~t the Anaheam ~aaQral Plan designates subject pxoperCy
:Eor l~w mediwn ~nd/or medium donsity residential land uses.
3. Thr~t the proposed roclas4ificatlon uf r~ubject praparty is
necessary and/or dRSiruble £or ~he orderly and proper dev~].opment ut the
community.
4. That the proposed reclassifica~iat: of sabject property does
properly relate to the zones and t2ieir pormiL-ted usos loc~lly established in
close proximity to sv.bject p.roparty and to the zones ~nd their permitted us~s
generally e~tabli~hQd throu~hout the community.
5. Thut the propo5ed recla~sification of subject propexty
req•uiros imprcvement of the abutting streot in accorclance with tha Circulation
Element oE the General Plan, due to th~ anticipated increase in traffic which
wi11 be generatoa by the intensification of land use.
6.
public hearinq;
subjact petition.
That one inkerested porson indicated his presence at said
and tt;at no correspondence was receSved in opposikion to
0868r -1- PC89-14a
~~
Y
~AZ~IF ,~NIA FNVIRQNM,~,NTAL_ A~ITY ACT FIN~N~C: Tha~ the Anaht~im Git~•
Planning Cummissi~n has review~,~ ~he proposa]. to reclassify subjact pxoperty
fr~m thQ RS-A-43,000 (Residc~ntial/Agricultural) Zoi~e to thQ RM-1200
(Fesi~3enY.ia1, Multip7.e-F~ni.ly) Zone with w~ivers ~f maximum structural hQi,ght
and maximum site coveraqe to c~rstruct a 3-stn±:y, 12-•uni~ apartment complex on
un irregularly-shapc~d parce7. nF land ccnsisting of apprpxi.mately 0.35 acre
havin! a. frontac~e of approximat~ly 65 EeeC ~n the narth side caf,. Savanna
StreQt, havinc~ a maximum depth of appraximaL-ely 290 teeL, bein~ l~cated
approximately 115 feet wost of tli~ cer.terline ~~ Mazian Way and fur~.her
described as 3625 Savanna Stre~t; and does hereby approve the N~gative
Declaration upon finding that it has considered the Negative Declaration
togetheY with any cammQnL•s recoived during the publia rgview process and
furth.er fincliny on thR bar~i:, of the initial stucly and any comments received
that there is no substant.i~l evidenc~ that the project will have a significant
eff.ect on the ~nvir~:zment.
NUW, THrREFQRE, Fi~: Ix RF:SOLVIsD that tlis Anaheim C~ty Planning
C~mmission does hereby gran~ subject Petition ior Ftec].asai:ication and, by so
doing, that Tit.le 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Cod6 be amended to
e~cclude the above described property £rom the RS-1~-43,OQ0 (Residenti3l/
Agricultural) Zona and to incoxpor~te said describe8 property 3nto the RM••-1200
(Resident.ial, Mu1Ciple-Farriily) Zor-e upon lhe following conditions which are
Yiere'by fotznc~ t;o be a necessary prereguisite ~o the proposed use of subject
pr,perty in order to preserve tne safety and genEral welfare of the Ci.tizens
of the Cily of Anaheim:
1, That street lightinq faciliLic~~ along Savanna Street sh~ll be instal'led
as requ~red b,y the Utilities General M~nager :in accordance with
specifications ori file in the Oftico oE UtiZitioa Gerieral Managers or
that securitg in the form or'. a bond, cpctificate of deposit, 1t~tLer of
credi~, or cas2i, in an amount and form satisfactory to tho (:ity ai
~naheim, shall be posted with thQ Cit,y to ~guaL•antec~ ~he satisfactory
comp~~txon of r.hd above-menti~ned improvements. Said security shall be
posted with thQ CiCy of Anahe.im prioz• to tho introductiorA of- an ordinance
rezoning subject ~;roperty. The ab~v~-requireci impr~vements sha11 be
installed prior to occupancy.
2. Thal: a foe ~hall be paid to ~ho City of l~naheim for tree planting along
Savanna £Y,reet in an amount as escabl.isheel by~ City Council rQSOluL•:ton,
3. That prior to intxaduction of an urdi.n~:.ca rRZOning subject prop~rty, the
legal propert-.y owner sha1J. preparG and recor~ an unsuborclinated covonant
limitir_g uccupar.cy of each a~artmant unit to nn more khan t~ro (Z) persons
~othar thun children under ~he age of two (2) years) per bec7room. Said
limttati~n shall be i.nc:luded in ~t~ch lease/renCa.: agreemelt. A cup,y of
the covenHnt shall be submitted ko and appr~ved by the City Attorney
pricr to recordation. A:opy oi tho recordod covAnant shall be furnished
to th~ Znning nivision.
4. 'rhat a covenant shall be recnrded agre~5.ng to r~rotride the rente.r of each
dwellinq unit with written information Qbtained from the School
Uistr.ict(s) pertaining to pos3iblQ ovorcrowded conditions and busing
status ot' the schocl(s) sorviny tho dwelliiig unit.
_Z_
PC89-140
~'i~' ~ifi(~~t
d,4
r;( ~
'~;~:
I 1! ff~~j~
,,~ , . . . . . . . . ~ . . . ~ . ~ . ' . ~ ~ , . ~ . . . ~ i ~ ~ ~~''~U3,
~` i ~7~}i
~ • . . ~.~, ' ~. ~
~
~t.~ ~ . . ~ . ,~r
~ ~;
r, ~
5. Th~t pri.or to +:he introdur.tion of an ord3.nunce rc~zon:tng subject proparty
or witha.n a parior~ af one (1) year from the date oE this resolution,
which~ver occurs firs~, Ccndition Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, above-mentioned,
~hall be com~lQted. '.Ch9 uxavisions or r,ights granted by this resolu~~nn
shall become nul]. and voSd by action of t.he Planning Commissior_ unlsss
said conditions are complisd with within one year from Lhe date ot' rhis
r~solur_iun, or sucb. furthgr t:ime as t~ie Plann:ing Commissi~n may c~rant.
~~i 6. ":hat approval of this a,pplication const.it•u~es approval nf tha ~roposed
,
request only t~ the extan*., that it aomp].ies with the Analieim Mun.icipal
Zoning Code and any c,~her applicable City requlations. Approval 8ues not
include any action pr f.indings as to compliance ar ~pproval o£ the
roquest rQgarding any al:her applicablo ordinance, regulatian or.
requirement.
IIG IT FURTH~R RESOL'VEn thai: the Anahe~.m City P'lan:~ing Commission
does heraby find ar~d dPCermine that adoption or this Resolution is ~xnressly
~redicated upon applicant'3 complianco with ~ach and aJ.l of tihe conditiuns
;i heroinabov~ ~et £orth. ~hould any such condi~ions, or any part f:hpr~of~ be
"~ decl~red :invalid or un~nforceab~Q by tt,e £inal judgment of any cuurL of
~'~ competent jurasdictiun, ther~ this Rosolution, and any approvals herein
;,;'; cor,tained, ~hall bP deemed null and void.
THE FOkEGOING P.ESOLUTION is siqned ~nd approve~9 by ma thiS 22nd day
° o~ May, 1989. •i
~ ,~, ~~ ;
' J~ ~>
. ~,~ ~ ,(' f ~t-/ ~ i '' fr~Yf-~'.,~ ..
~ ~ . ~~~.~:{
CHAZRWAMAN, ~AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMl'SSION :~,y,~.
,;.'' ,f~
>:: `.`t
ATTESTt
'~ .__-_ ~ 46[~~' °'~..i_~`1~~._ ._.r.. ,,
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CaTY PLANN.TNG C.UI~SISSIUN ,,
STATE OF CALI~'~RN:[A }
CC~i7NTY Or ORAI~TGE ) ss.
CITY OF A:ZAHEIM )
I, Ed.ith L. ~Iarris, SecrQtazy ot the Anaheim Cit,y Planning
Commission, do hereby cer4:ify that tho foregoanq resolution w~:s passed and
adopte~ at a meeting oE the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on Ma~r 22,
19A9, by the fo]lowing vo~e ok the members th~reof:
AY~;Ss CONQdISSIONERSs BOUAS, CARUSILLO, FELDHAUS, MC BURt1FY, MES5E
N~ES: COMMIS5IDZTERS: BOYDSTUN, HERBST
ABSENT: COMMISSIO~TERS: NON~
IN WI~NESS W'HEREOr, I have h~reunto set my harid this 22nd day of r:~
~~ .-..,iI,F
May~ 1909. ,.;;,,
s:
n.
.
k. ~ r~~Wr~ r rfi
` __.. ~ r ~IL 3,'
'
SECR~TA1tY, ANAHEIM CITX PLANNING COMMISSI4N „~•'~;;4
~i` -3- FCa9-190 ;;~
~s' , ?.;~
;,~
1i
:i~
1
~n
a~} i:.<, . ....._ -..,.. ..... . .. .. .. .. , _ . ~ . ^r~
H .~.w,r..C~.+S:tr'1rrtr,:r .~J'1. .~: i..i r..i~~.,~..,, . . , . , . . . . . . .. . ~
. . . . . . . . - .. . . . . - .. ~ . , _~.r.:~~.~...~~{~.i..'.:.:!:,r,.,:ff.~~%iXAiS~7Cl~1~'