Resolution-PC 89-143_ ~% QL.~~QN NO . ~'~.$Q ~.4~
A R~SOLUTI4N OF 1HE ANr~FIEIM CITY PLANNIN~ CUt~4fISSION
THAT PETIT'[ON COR 'IAP,IANCE N0~ 3956 ~3E GRAN1'ED
WHER~AS,
verified Petitiaix for
Boul~vard, Orangc~, CA
Gwatney, 634 S. I.oara
propPrty si.tuatQd in
Cali£orni.a, describod a
the AnahQa.m City P1~nning Commissioaa did racoive ~a
Variance from Paul Et. (:hiavatti,, 489 N. wnahei.m
92bf>8, owner, and 1-NACAL ~HGTNEEI2ING, Attn: G1en
Street, Anahoim, CA 928U2, agent for certain real
the City of Anaheim, County ofi Orange, State of
s follo~+s :
A POR1'TON OF i'HE WEST HALF OF THE EAST I3ALF OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF LOT 48 OF ANAF~EIM EXTENSION, AS
::I~Oh'N ON A MAE' OF SURVFY M31DE BY WIF,LII~hi HAMEL, A.ND
FILED IN THE OE'FICE OF 'T.FIE COUINTY RECO~DER OF Lb5
ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCEIBED AS FOLLOWS:
I3EGINiJI27G AT TFiE SOCJTHGAST COIt.NER OF LOT 18 OF T42ACT
N0. 1544, IN TH~ CITY OE' ANAEiEIM, C(IUNTY Ol' ORAN~~;iE~
S'SATE OF CALIFOR;IIA, AS : HUWN ON ]~ MAP RECORDEA TN
AOOK 47, PAGE 30 OF MISCELLANEOUS MI~P5, EZECORCI5 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALr:ORNIA; THENCE SOUTH 0° 11' 37"
F;AST, ALONG THE SOIITHERLY pROLONGAxTON OF THE
EASTF.RLY LINE UF SAID TRACT N0. 1544, TO A POINT UN
THE CENTER LINF: OF A 60 E'OOT STRb;ET ICNOWAT AS CRONE
AVE2NE, AS SHOWN ON SAIA MAP OF TRACT N0. 15~34;
THENCE SOUTS 89° 10' 00" WEST ALONG xHE C~NTER LINE
aF SA'[p CRONE AVEIv'UE, 164.11 FC~T Tn A POT_NT ON TFiE
SOUTHERLY E]CTENSION ~F THF DSOST EA~TERLY LINE OF LUT
15 OF SA:[D TkACT NQ. 1544 j THEtiCF NOP.TFi 0'D 09' 5~!"
WF.ST, ~~,ONG SAID SOUTH~RLY EXTEN57(ON l~ND THE MOST
EAS'P~ItLY i,INE OF SAID LOT 15; 328.88 FEET TO AN 't.NGLE
PUINT IN SAID TRACT N0. Y544; THENCE NORTii 89° 14'
~7" EAST, ALONG :CHE SQUTH LINE OF LOTS 16, 17 AND 18
OF SAID TRACT N0. 1544, 163.93 FF~,T TO T}iE POINT OI'
BEGINNING;
EXCFPTING THEREFROri TIiE EaST 80 ~EET;
AL50 EX~EPTING THERCFROM THA~ PORTION LYING SOUTH OF
'CiiF. NdRTH LJNE qF THAT CEitTAIN STRIP OF' LAND CONVEYED
BY C.W. HEUGES AtJD OTHERS TU TEIE CIZ'Y OF ANAFiEIM, BY
DE~DS RECORDED MARCH 2, 1908 IN BOOK 157, PAGES 334
AND 335, RESPk;CTIVET,Y UF DEEDS.
WFIEREA5, the City Planning Commisaion did hold a public hoar.ing
at the Cfvi.c C~nter in rhe City uf A,nali~im on May 22, 19E39, at 1:30 p.m.,
not.ice ~f said public hasring having bevn duly given as required by ~aw and in
accordanc~ witk the provisious of the Ax~aheim rSuni.c~pR.l Code, Chapter 18.03,
t~ hear and consider c~vidence f~r nnd against sa.td propoaQd v ar.iance ~snd to
inve5t.iqAte anci~nakn f~ndinys z-nd rocommen?latxons in conn~c;rion thorewith; ~nd
0872r
-1~
PC$9-143
~:'r
,.' ~
e~ ., ;,x
~~,
+
WHERr\S, said Cammission, c~f.t~r due inspoatioli, investigation
and study mnde by itself• and i.n its behalE, ~nd aE~er due c~nsidert~tion of a11
Rvidence t~nd reporC~s off.ored at said heaY~Ing, d~es Eind and dAterminQ the
following facts:
l. Tnar the petitioner. requesta waiver ~f t'~e folloWing to
establish ~ 3-l~t sub~livision to construct 2 airigla-f~rnily homt~sa
A
~~~T7~._?_$.s..S1~1~Q - R~uir~~~ ~r~t~~.
(A:il 1~, required to abut a publ_s.c street or alley; ,~
?.ots without frnnt~tge pr~pasad)
2. That the nbave-mentionr~d waivPrs are he.reby grantad on the basis
i:hat ther.Q ara special circums~aricos applicr~ble to Che~ property such as size,
shape, topogr~phy, location ~nd surraunding:~ which r3.o not apply t:a other
identir.ally zone~d Qropcrty in tt;e :;ame vicinity; that atrict aQplic~,t3on oE
ths Zonxng Codo deprives L•he proper~.y of: privileg~s enjoyed by other
' ~roperties in the identical zone and classification in ~ho vicinity anc! that a
private acce:;s eas~rnent in accordance with Ciky sCandards will be pro~ri~~ad.,
'
'`' 3. That there are excer~t;.nnal or extraordinary circums':ancEt; ur
' conditzons applicahle to tha proporty involved or to ~he ii~tended use of the
y.
~r~perty L•hat do not apply yenorally to .:he proper*y or class o.E usa in the
scvne vic,initp and zonQ.
4. Th~t tbe requested variance is necessary ~or trP ~Sreaervat.£on
and enjoyment of a subsrant.ial prc~porty x•ight possossed by other proper~y xiz
Che same vicinity and zono, anrl deniec~ to the property i.n quesC.ion.
5. ~'hat tlze r.onuested varitince will nut be.t materially deCrimantal
ro the public welfar.e or injurious to the praperty or impr~vements .~n such
via~nity ancl zone .in which thQ property is locatad.
6. '.tha~ five (5) people indicated their prosence at said public
heari.ng in apposition; an~. that no c~rresponden~e was received in opposition
to subject pc~tition.
~~~QRjI':A ENy,IRQJ t~E I,~~T_QUAI, xX ACT ~'~1QINC: Zhat th~ Anat~eim
City Flai~ning t^omm~asian has reviQwed thQ proposal to rPc. ~ssify sub;ec~
prop~rty from tra RS~A-43,000 (Resiflential/Agr'cultur~l) Znnr, ..o the RS -720U
(R~sidc~ntial, Singl~-Fam.xly) Zone to construc_ a 3-lot 3ubdivision with
waiver or reguirecl lot frontage on a r.•ectangularly-shaped parcel of l~nd
con~isting of approximat~l.y 25,093 s~uare feot, having a frontage oF.
approximatgly a4 foot on t'l~e north s.ide of Crone AvtT17~U@~ having a maximum
depth of ap~iox9.ma4ely 300 feet, being l~catc~d ~p~roximately 243 feet west af
the centerline of Pythias Avenue and further described as 1421 West ~rone
avenue; and does h~reb~• approve the N~qative Declaration upon finding that it
has c~nsidered the Negr~tive Declt•.atiun tugethar with any comments r~ceived
during the pnblic review proces~ ar.d ~urther finding on the basis of the
i,~ir.i~i studg and any comments received that there is no substant•ial eviden.:e
that the praject wil.l havo a signi.tican~ effect on the environment.
, , i ;~
~a„~:
,.1'
t.
~2- PC89-Y43
~
~ti
, _ . ..,,,, t,v,~,n,,,
,:~~
NOF1, ~FiEREFORE, HE I'1' RESOLVED that the .A,2aheim City Planning
Commiss3nn does hareby grant subjec~ k~eti~zon Eor Varxance, upon the
followii~g condi~ions which ar~ horeby fuund to ba a.necessary prerequis3i:e to
the proposeG u5c~ of the su5ject propeL~ty in ordar to preserve the sa£et~ and
• ganeral walfare of Che Citizens aE the City ~of Anaheim:
~ ~, ;
l. That sidewalk ,, curbs an~ giitters sha:ll be rer,a3.red along CronE~ Avonue
aa r.equirod by the C:ity Engin~er ~n~i i.n accordz . with standard p]ana
and specifications on fiJ.e in the O~fice ui•' khe City E;~igineer.
2. 'Phat priar to issuance of. a building permiL-, the appropx~iate traff.ic
~igz~al asskssment £ee shall be paid to tho City n£ Anahe3.m in an amount
as ~:stablished by City Council resolut3on.
3. 7.'hat gatQS shall not bQ ir~stalled across the drfveway in a manner which
may adversely affect vehicular traff•ic in the t~djacont public str.eet.
Tnstall~tion of ~ny gutes sh~11 con.Eorm to Lhe Er.gineering nepartmemt's
, Standard Pl~n Nn. 90? and shail be subject ta th~ rev3ew ~-nd approval of
the Gi.ty Traffic Engineer.
~' 4. That f.ire sprinklers ~hall be installe3 as reguired by tk~e City Fire
, Departmeut.
5. ThaL• drainage of subjQCt property shall be approvcd 3n ~ manner
satisfactozy ta tihe City Fngineer.
6. '1`hat all lots within subject subdivision sha11 be served by unc~.erground
txtzlitiss,
'7. Th~t all air conditioning facilit:.es and other xoof and ground mounted
oquipment shall b~ propezly shieldeci :~rum view anc~ the sound buffered
.f.rom adjacent res.idential properties.
8. Tb.,at prior to 3.ssuance of a building permit, Qvidexice sh~:7. be submitted
to the 9ui.lding Division showing that the proposod project is in
conforrnance with Counai I Policy Niimbc~r 542 "5ound ~,tt~-n~uation in
kesidential Pro;jects" and with Noise Insula~:ion Standard~ specified in
the California Adrninistrative Co~e, Title 25.
9. That subjecr_ propQrty shRll be clevo:lopeci substantially in accordance
with Qlans and ,pecif,cationg on Eile with the C3~y of Anaheim marked
Exhibit No. 1.
10. That prior to issuance of a buil.ding perm{t oc withir. a~,~eriod o~E one
(1) year from the date of l;his reacclut:ion, whichever occurs first,
Condi~ion Nos. 2, 5 and ~3, above-mentioned, shall bc~ compliod with.
Rxtensio~xs for ~urthex time to comgleto sai.d condit3ons ma;- be qranted
in accor.tiance with Sc;atien 1fl.03.09Q of the Anahc~im Municipal Cotie.
il. xhat prior to final buildir.g anfl zoninq inspec~ions, Condition No~. 1,
4, 6, 1 and 9, above-montioned~ A~381.I. be comp].iod with.
-3-
PC89-143
r;
''~
~.~,~
';;
~~~
'r;,
,ry;d
~,4
": i
, ,,
;i
~;
;.
,,
~
~.
12. Th~t approval of this applfcation constitutes approval of the pr~pus~d
request only to tha c~xtont that i.t r.omplias with the Annheim Municlpal
'Loning Code and any ~thor applicable Cit,y regulnti4~s. Approvc+7 doos
n~t include any acti~~n or f.i.ndings r~s t~~ complt~.nce or c-pproval of the
raquent rogarding i~ny othar applicable orainnnce~, regulation ox
requir~ment.
BE IT FURTFiE~ R~SOLVED that tho Anaheim City planning Convnission
does horeby find and detormine that: adoption of this Resolutlon is expresaly
prc~dic~tgd upon app2icant's compliance with oach and all of ~he ~~ondi~ions
hereinabnve set L•ortl~. Should any such coriditions, or any p~trt thereof, be
dQClared invnlfd or unenforceable by the final ju~3gment of any court of
competent jurisdiction~ thon this kesoTution, and any approvals hexein
contain~d, shal'1 ba deemQd nu11 anci void.
~2iE FORE;GOlNG RE:SOLUTIOr1 is siqxied and approved by mo this 22nd day
of idav, 1989.
,.,,., ~; ,~
---------~•' '.!';'~ i /~¢ix:~r, _~_
CHAiRWrJM1,N,; ANAHEIM CITX PGJINNING COMhiIuSION
ATTEST:
-- ' ` ~ ~ti7e/-~~±~~_-.~_~..._---
uECRETARY, ANl.HEIM CTTY PLI~NNTNC CUMt~'ISSION
STATE OI' CALIFOPNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGG ) ss.
CITY OF ANAFI~IM )
I, Edith L. fiarris, Sacretary of tha~ Anaheim City Plraninq
Commission, do hvreby cer*.ify that ttie forer,oing xesolution was passed and
adoptad at a mertiny of the Ar.aheim CiC},- Plr~nning Cortaniseion hald on Mey 22,
1989, by th~s fo:lowing vote oE C!~Q members Choreof:
AYES: COMMlSS'LONERS: BOUAS, BOYDSTUZT, CARUSZ~,LO, HERB~T,
~~ MC BURNEY, MESSE
NOES: COh4IZSSIONERS: FELDHAUS
~ ' ABSEt7T: C01~4riISSIONERS: NON~
It3 WITNF,SS WHEF.EOF, I have her~t~unto aet my hand this 22nd day of
'" May, 1989.
.,.+....~ ~?{~~~~~l.t...~_ __~
S~CRETAYt , ANdHEIM CITY PLl~NtiING COIr4rtI5SY0N
-~- PC89-143
y. , -;
~a-',
,,
; ~ ~`;
~ `i
~:~: