Resolution-PC 89-144' ~~1
,~
K~;~ t, ~i_ rr rr4,._..~~4 ~.
~
A R~;SOLUTION OF TFiE ANAF.(EIM CI~Y pL~1NNItvG COMMT~SZON
TFiAT PF:CITTON F'OR VARIANCE N0. ~951 B~ GRANZ'Ell
WHERFAS, tho An~hoim City Planning Conuniasion did roaoivo a
veri.fied k~etition Eor Vari ance from RAY:•tOND ASSOCI~TGS, 81x W. 7tYi StreeC,
Suite 310, Los AngQlea, CA 9f1017, ownc~r, nnd BOWER PEREZ ASSOCIATES, 811 S~.
7L•h 5~re~C, SuitQ 310, L~~s Angeles, CA 9U07.7, agent fur certai.n real property
sitvated in ~he City a.E Ariaheim, County of Orango, Stat.e oP Calif•orn.ia
described as:
~'HAT PORTIO-1 OE TNE k'RACTZQNAL NORTFiEAST. QUARTEE2 OF
SECTION 3, TOWNSEITP 4 SOUZ'FI, RI~NGE :LO WEST, TN 1'HC
R~~NCHO SAN JUA23 GAJON DF SANTA ANX-, IN TAE CITY OF
AN~(EIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STAT~ OF CALIFORNXA, AS
PER MAP RE~URDED IN IiUOK 57., PAGE lU OF M'ISCELLANEUUS
MI~PS, TN THE O~FICG OF THE COUNTY RECORDGR OF SAIb
COL'NTY, DESCRIBGA AS FOI~I,pWS;
,~ bEGINNING AT A POIPIT 10 CHAINS ~OUTH OF THE NORTHEAST
• CO1tNER OF SAID SECTION 3, 1'I?GNCE SOUTH 10 CHAFNS
AI~ONG THF SEC:2IQt~T iINE; THENC~ WEST 20 CHAINS
PP.RAI~LC[, TO TEiE N022THERLX LINE OF SATD SCC'PIUN;
THENC~ NORTH 10 CHAINS AND TEiENCE GAST 20 CHAINS TO
THE PUtNT OF BEGINNING.
u0T A AI' TRACT N0. 6383, I~Y THE CITY 03? ANAH~ID1,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHQWN ON A
MA:~ FcECORDED IN HOOK 244, PAGE 48 OF MISCELLANEQUS
hiAPS, RECORDS OF ORA2IGE COUNTY, CAI.IL'ORNIA, LYINC
WITHIN TENTATtVE PARCEL MI~P 64-142.
WEiEREAS, the City Planning Commi.~sion did hold a pixblic hearing
at tne Civic Canter in the City of Anaheim ou May ?.2, lggg, at 1:30 p.m.,
noticc o~ said public hgariny }iavznq been duly gzven as required by law ~,nd 3n
acc~rdance with the provisicns oE the Anaheim Municipal Codo, Chapter 18.03,
to hoar and consider av~dQnce for and against said proposed var.iance and to
investi~ate and make findings and recommendations in connection there ..Ll~; a„d
WHk:kEAS, said CommiK~ion, aPter due inspecr.ion, invastigt~tion
aiid study macle by itsel~ an~l 3n its behalE', and afCer due consideration of all
ovidence and r,eports offc~red at said hQaring, doas ~ind and determine the
tollowang far,t•s:
I. That the petitiorior rP~uesls waivers of the follow3ng to
eQrablish a 16~1ot industrial s~abdivisio:::
0073r -1- PC99-144
~
~
i
~~A?!cPt.:.. ;.:..r.: /re.^rc - . . ... , _ . . ,
~yrn !~.
/k'+~~1~
~
,, ~
'I
~; ,
w^~
(A) ,~~~.~:I~N_ 1.4~4_~~~0 - R iixQ.$~~!'~.~~1.5~€~9Q•
(~.1__~Q~.,ry. required t~ abut a public stree~ pr
a11~y; I,~~,~1os. 2~~,r~ua 12 not ~butting
public stc•eot or a11ay)
(~) F:rzi~ 1~§i~o.5~~~:~1 -• Mi~iLn1~_~!_Fr4~~.~~~24L~k•
(.'~0 £eot;, roquiro8 along RaSnnond Avenue; ~~fg,Q~
propo~ad)
2. That the above-mentioned waivers axe hereby granted ~n ~he basis
tha~ thore arQ spc~ciaJ. circums~ancQS aFpl,icablQ ko the pruper'ty such ns size,
shape, t~pography, location and surr.ovndings whzch ao not apply tn other
identically zoned property in tho ~ame vicinity; that stric~ application of
the Zaning Code deprivbs the pro~erty of pri.vilggos enjoysd by other
propertzes in tho identi.cal zonQ and classification in the viai~nit;~, and that
private acco3s easements will be provided in ace~z•daiice wi~h City star~dards.
3. That there are exceptional ax extraordiriary circumstancas or
conditians applicable to tlir~ property invulved or ~o the ini:ended use o~ t2ie
p•-operty that do not apply generally to th~ property or class of use iYi the
~ame vicini.t,y and zone.
4. That the requested variance is necessary f.or the preservatian
a:zd enjoyment nP a substanti~,l p:operty right possessed by o~her pro;~erty in
the same vicinity and zone, and denied to tY-e propQrty in question.
5. That the requested vaxianco wi'l1 not ba materially detrimental
to the public welfare ~r injv.rious to tl:e property or imprnvomen~_s in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is locatad.
6. That no one indic~tad hheir prgsance a~ said public heari.ng in
onposition; and that n~ correspondence was zece.ived in opposition to stabject
pe~iti~n.
~A~,~~g~IIA EiNIR~tt~N:~,A~„QjLAT,~~X ACT FINDING; That the Anaheim
CiCy Pla:ining Commission has review~c~ tho proposal for waiver af requirod lor
fxontaqe and minimum front setback to e~tablish a 16•-1at indus~zial
subdiuision on a rectangularly-shaped pTrnel of l~nd consis~ing o~
approximaCely 18.6 acres locakad at the northwest corner of R~ymond A~enue
and Orangofair Lane an~d further doscribod as 1525-1547 27orth Raymond Avenue ;
and does hereby approve the Negative Decl~ration upon tinding that it has
c.onsidered khe NQgative Declaratic~n kogather ~,~it1i any commenCs raceived
during the publtc roview process and furth~r find.ing on the basis of ~he
initial ~tu~y and any commeiit3 received that there is na substant~al evidence
that the project will h~ve a signlficant eftoct on the env.ironmctnt;.
NOW, THEREFO~E, BE I'!' RESOLVBD that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby gi•ant subject Petition for VariancQ, upun the
following conditions ~hich arQ hereby found tc be a necessary prorequisite to
the pruposed use of the subject propRrty in or..er to preservo the safety an8
genarctl welfare of the Citizens o~ the City of Anahoims ._.
-Z-
PC89-144
S
`>'r.
4,ri ~ ' _ _ .. .. .. . . . ..... o.~~.~r-,•,yur~v.a1
~ `,'
' „
! 1
, Ad'~
1. That. prior to issuanco of a building pormit, ~hN approFrgate traffic
sa
gnal asse
.
ssmynt fao shull be p~id to the City of Anah~im in an amoun~t
as ostab7.ished bI~ City Council
resolution.
2. Tkiat sidewalka~ sha11 be installed along Raymond Avenue ss requiroc~ by ttie
City Engineer and i
!
~i
~ n aecoxdanc~ with standord plans t~nd spocifications ~n
£i1e in the Off.ice of the Ci~y Engir.oQr,
,, ~
3.
7'hat all drivoways an Raymon:i AvenuQ shall ba constructed With ton (1p)
foot radius a
b
ur
returns as require3 by th~ City Enc~ineer.
;.
, 4.
' That any fencing or y~tos installod anywhere on subject pro~erty sha11 be
reviowed a.nd approved by the F1
D
~
, YA
epartmon~, City Traif.ic Engiueer and
Zoning Div.ision.
,'' S.
' That all cirive ai.sles lFaading ho ~ruck do~rs shall be desigaed wiCh
m3nimum widthc of thirt~
t2~r
c
(33
~ y
;
e
~ feg~, ~ss required by the City Tra~fxr.
Engineer.
5. That s'treet lighting Fac~litx~s along Raymond Aver~ue shall be .in~tallsd
as roquired. by the Urilities General Manager in aacordance wx~h
spoci£icar_ions on file in tlie Offico of 'Jtilities General Manager; or
that security in the form of ~ bond, certific~te of denosit, letter of
credit, or cash, in an amount and form sati;;factiory to the Czty p~
Anaheir~, ~hall be posted with the Cit.y to guarantee the satisfactory
com~letion af the above-men~ioned improvements. Said s~curity shall bQ
posted with the City of An~heim prior to issu~ncs of a building permi,t.
The above-required improvernent;s shall be installed prior to ~ecupancy.
7. Th.at al1 lols within subject subdivision shall hQ served by undergroun~3
utilities.
8. That separate fir` service r.onnac~ions (backflowsj shall be provfded for
each building within subject subdi~rision, as requireci by thR City Ff.re
DoparL•mont.
9. That orior to commoncement of structur.al framirag, on-sitt~ fire hydrants
shall ba installed and charged as required and 3pproved by the City Fire
Department. An all-waather roaci must be providec~ to the hydrant and be
available a~ a11 times,
10. That fire sprinklers sYiall be insL-alled ~s requirod by the City Ffrc~
Depar tt~ent .
.11. That the water main sh~ll be t.ied in from property to the norkh to lnop ;
through subj~ct property, as required by Cho Water Enginoerxng Division. j
In a3~9fti.on, the exisCing FullertQn fire service shal]. be abandoned.
~
12. That a recipror,t~1 access agreoment, in a form satisfactory to the City 1
I
Attorney, shall be recc,rded with the pffice of the Orange County f
F?scorder. A copy oE th~ recorded agreement shall then be submitted to ~"~
the ?.on~ing Divi~ion.
-3- F'C89-144 ~
i
~ ' . ~ ~ ' . . . . " . . i . r .:~,t4~~.'I'.
f.
~ ~r.;;c...\ , .
, ~,r1,ke~ ~
Y;~S'
13, That tha vehicul~x access rights tio Raymond Avenue, except at app.xoved
access points, sY,all be dedicated tc~ the City oE Arlaheim.
1~. That drAinage c~f subject property sha11 be appravad in a rnanner
satisf3ctory to t:ho City Engineer.
15. That trash storage areas shall bE provided and ma.intained in a locat,ion
acce~~table to the Street Maintenance ~nd. San.itAtion Divis3c+n bnd in
accordance with approvQd p.lans on Eile wit2~ sai~ Div3~ion. Such
inEormaL•ian shall ~ie specifically shown on the plan~ submitted for
building permits.
16. That all ~ir. condiCioning facilities a.nd uther roof nnd ground mo~:nkeci
equipment shall be properly shi.elded from view. Such xnformation sha11
be specifzcal:ly shown on thQ plans ~ub-nitL•ed for buildin~ p~rmits.
17. That the proposal sha11 ~~mply wi~h all signing requirement;s o~ ~hQ M1L
"InBustrial, Limitad" Zone, unless a vari.ance allowing sigr,~ waivers is
ap~roved by the Cit,y Counr.il, Planning Commi.ssion ar Zoning Admanistrator.
lt~. Tha~ a landsc~pe plan for subject property aha13, be subm,itted ~o the
Zaning Division fos rev.iew and apprav~l. Any decision made by the Zoning
niUision regarding saiil ~>~ ~n may b~ appaaled to the Planning Commis5cion
ancl/or City Cauncil.
19. ThaL subject pruperty sha11 bo dQVelopecl substantia].ly in aCCOrdance wi.th
plans and specifications or. fi1~ with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibil:
Nqs. 1 throug~ 8.
20. 'Phat priar ta issuar~ce af a bu,ilcling permit or wii:lzin a period of one (1)
yoar Prom tlie dnte o[ this resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition
Nos. 1, 5, 6, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 18, above-m~ntionad, sha11 be
compl ied with. Extensioris for fi-rther time tio com~lete said concliCions
may be grante~3 in accorciance with Section 1a.03.090 of tlie Anaheim
Municipal Coc~e.
21. That prior to final buildir,g and zoning inspections, Cor_dition No:a. 2, 3,
6, 7, 8, 10, 1~ and 19, above-mentioned, sha7.1 be compli~d wi~}l.
22. That approval of ~his application constitutos approva.l ~f the pr~posed
request on].y to the extent that it cam~lfes with the Anaheim :~unicigal
2oning Code and any other applicablfl City regulations. Approval floes not
i.nclude any action or findings as to complianao or ap~.~roval of t'tzo
reque~t rgg~r~3iiig any otha~r applicable ordinance, requlation or
requirement.
BE IT FUF.THER RESOLVED that the Anareim City Pl~anninq Commission
does hereby L•ind and cletermine that a8option of this Resolution is expressly
precl3cated upon applicant's compliamce~ with each and ~11 of the condit3ons
herei.nabove set forth. Should any such condit3~ns, or ariy part ~hereof, be
declared invalfd or unnnforceable by the Einal judqmont ot a~ny court of
competent juristiiction, then this Resoluhion, ancl any approvals heroin
cont~inod, shall be deemed null anci void.
'4- PC99-144
y
~1
. ;~
~~'~
~ ,
_ _ ~ ~I~'~~L~.-,..~:.r__ .
SECR~:IARY, ANAHEYM CITY PY,bNNING COMhlISSION
THF FUREGOTNG RESOLUTTQ:T zs signed and approved by me this 22nd day ~'~
of May, 1989. ~'
•~ ~ ~: ,
~~'r~l.d' % !J~`=c~.S2._.._ i
CHA OMAI~,,-~NAH~IM CITY P~,~NN'!NG COMMISSION `~
~~
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUtdTX OF ORA2:G~; ) ss.
CTTY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harri;;, Secrocary of tho Ianaheim Cit~y Planning
Commis~ion, d~ hereby certzfy that the foregoing resolution wms passed and
~dopted at a moeting of t,:ho Anaheim City Plannixig Commissznn hold on May 22,
1989, by the following vol:e of the members thereois
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, i30YDSTUN, CARUSILLO, FELD~iACTS, T.~IEREiST,
MC EiURN~Y, I~(ESSE
NCL'S: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: CON,I~SISSIONERS: NONE
IN WI'rNESS WFiEREOF, I tiave hereunr,o sQt my hancl this 22nd day of
May, 1909.
~ '`' ~ ~ .
.~~ __ ~
SECR~'fAR]f, ANAHEIM CTTY f'LANNING COt~4IISSI02i
~'
~5-
PC89-144
~;,i
~~
;
~i
;.;
"'/:
.;~
•,fi,
~ ;.,~~
;,.~;+v
~Y~
, .. . .. ~,..?~