Resolution-PC 89-157~'t • ~~ ~
~?~.9.k.VT ~ 4N?39~_...k~.@9.`~Z
A RESOLUTION OF THE bNAHEIM CTTY PT,ANNING CpMMISSION
TFIAT P~'CIT30P; FOR CONpTTtONAL USE YERMIT IdO. 3156 H~ GRANT~b
WHEREAS, the Anahc~i,a City P1a.,ilning Commissdon did recaive a ver3ffecl
Petlkiun for Cpnc~ltional Usa P~rmit fro:n Vl~NDEftBIL1', I,rD„
SuiCo 400, MiSSion Viej~, CA 92691, ownPr, an~i STEVE DCJNDAR, 204 9 YorbaALinda
BoulQVard, Yorba Linda, CI# 93G~6, a gent for c a r ta. in rea l property situated in
t ho CiLy of. Anahc~im, Coun~y o£ Orange, Statc~ of CaliForr,3a, duecribad ast
PARCEI,S 8 AND 9 AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN HAOK 222,
PAC,ES 37 TQ 41 INCLUSlVE, OF P.\KCEL MAPS, IN THC
~FFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDEEt GF QItANGG COUNTY,
CALIPURNIA.
'; wi~~REA5, the Citl Planning Commis~ion 9id hald a public hearing at
the Civic Ce.nter in the City of. Anaheim on Ju:~e ~, 198g at 1:;0 p.m., notice
~ of said public hearing having heon rlul
~4, ~.ccor~lancQ with the provisions of the An liegmVMunacipal~ Code, Chagt~-r 18.03n
tu hear and consider ~v.idence for and aqainst said proposed conditlona.l usc~
i permit and to invost.~.~ete and m;~,.~~ Eindings and recommendations in c~nnection
~ thorewiU~l dnd
PTFiEREAS, said C~mmission, after due inspecrion, investigation and
stu3y mada by its~lf and in its behalf, and after due consideration of gll
c~videnee and reports offerQCi at said hoaring, cioes Flr.t3 and determine the
fo?:lowinq facts:
1• That the per,itioner re~quests approval of a conditional use
permit unde~ au~hority of Cocle Sections 1i3.03.0~0.U10 and 18.44.050.050 to
wit: t~ pormjt an animal hospital withi:i ~ p~oposed cammercial ro*ail conter.
2. That ~he prdpos~d usQ will not ~dvRrsely a~E'ecC the adjoininq
Iand uses and t:~~ growth and devel~~ment of the arc~a in which it is propos~8
to bo locrstQd.
3• rr,ar tlne siz~ and shape ot rhQ site proposed for rne usp is
adeqaate Lo all~K tha full develop~nent ot the proposod use in a mA.nner not
detrim~ntal to ti~e pnrr.icular area z~or to the ~eace, liealth, safety arac~
qeneral wel~are of th~ Citizens of t}~Q City of Ar,ahoim.
4• That the grantiny n~F the CondiCional IIae Permit undor the
candSCfons imposed, if any, Nill not Le c.letrlmental to the peace, health,
safetx and qeneral welfaro ~f the C.itizens nf the Ciry of Anaheim.
~. Th~t tho traffic ~~onerated by the proposed ~ase w;ll not impo3e
an undue bucclan upun the vtr.auta and hiqha~ys desi~n~d ar9 impr~vod to carry
the trafiic in the arna.
0891r
-1-
PC 69-157
r,va~
~ •
:ry,.
~~
6. That no one indir.aCei1 thoii• presonca at saic5 public hearing in
o~posir~.oT~1 and that no corrospondence wa~ rec~ive8 ln opgositlon to thR
sub;joct p~tition.
~,A~~Q.$j~}'A ENVIc'2Q1~(~'~iT~[~ OilA.~~f _~~_ 7~.NDxNs: That the An~sheim
CiLy P1~.~ining Cnmmi.ssion has revieweQ tho proposal to permit t~n animal
hucpital withfn a proposed cornmorcial retai'1 c~ntr~r on an 3rregularly-si~apad
parc:ol of land consisting of approximate]y 1.96 acres located at the
iior.thwpst corner of Woir Canyon Road and Santa Ana Canyon koad, having
approximate frontaqes ot 177 foet on ~he wost side aE Weir Canyon Rot~d nnd
391 Eec+C on the nurth siclc+ of Santa Ana Canyon Road, az-d furL•her describe~ as
82t~5-95 Santa Ana Canyon Road; and doe~ hereby appxove tlio Negative
Decl~ration upon finding that 'Y, has r.onsidored the Nogative Declaration
togetYior witii any commanta receivad during thQ public rov.iew procsss and
£~.~rtha~ fin~'' ng nn the basis of thR ini ~i.al study znd any comments receivaii
that there ia na substantial ovidonc~ that the projec.t will hav~o a
sfgnificant eFfocL• on tho environment.
NOW, TkiEREFORE, .BE I7' RESOLVEll t2iat tihe Anahaim ~;ity Planniag
" Commis~ion does .hezeby grant subject Pot3.tion for Condir_.tonal Use Permit,
upon the f~'1lowir~g condit3on3 wY~ich ~+ro kieroby fou.nc~ ko be a necest~ary
,'.
prerequisite to tho proposed use o~ the subj~ct property in o:d~r to presexve
~ the sa£ety and general wc~lEare: of the C.itlzens of the City of AnahQ3m:
1. Thar the owner uf subject property si~all submit a letter requestiing
terminat.ion of Variance No. ~383 to the Zoninq Divisiun.
2. That a tra~sh encloaur~ tor clouble units with gates shall be pr.ovidad and
maintained fn a l~cation accvptable to th4 Street Maintenance and
Sanit3Cion Divfsioi~ and in accardance with approved plans on ffle wfth
3aid Dfvini~n.
3. Tlsrat pr.tor to iS3U311CA ~~f a building permit, r_,tQ legaJ. or+ner of subjACZ
proporty shall dedicate tu tha City of Anahoim a five (5) foot wide
public ti~:ility oasement along the east 3ic~e of L•}ie Motropol.itan Water
Ai~tri.ct (MWD} easQment adjacenc to the proposod building. Suid easemont
ghall bo roco:ded with ~ho OEfice of the Oranqo (:ounty Recordor. proof
of said recordati~n shall %hon be submitted to the Zohiisg Uivision.
4. That the propo~al shall comply with al2 signit,g xegufrements Q~ the
CL~SC) "Commercial, Limit~d - 5c~nlc Corridor Overloy" Z~ne, unleas a
veriance a1low.ing sign waiv~rs is appcoveci by che City Cou::cil, Planning~
Commi~sion or zoning Ad:ninistraL•or.
5. That, as spc-cified in Anahetm MunicipTl Code Sucrion 13.84.~62.032, no
roof-mour-~.ed oquipmc~nt ~hall bs perrr~itted.
6. :Y.at the on-eite 1an13cr.pinq aha]1 be m~intainod in compliance a.fth City
s!:andards .
'J. xhat subje~t ~roperty shall be developed aubstantial.ly in accorCa»ce with
plans aa~G gpec~tficattona ~n fila r+ith tho City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
Naa. Y throuqh 3.
's
_Z..
PC 09-157
'%~:, , ;
~
~~
/~,,~
~:.
8. ~hat prlor to r.ommeii:~ement of tho act.ivit~ s~uthorized by rhis r~solution,
or prior to issuance of ~ building permi~, or wlthin a~~r3od of one (1)
year from the date oP this rosolut3An, whichever ocnura first. Conc~3~ion
Nos. 1 ancl 3, above-ment.i~ned, sha11 be cornpliod with. ~xtension3 For
Eurrher t;ime to c^~mpleka st~id c.onditions may be granted in accordance
wi~h Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municip~l Codc~.
9. That prior to tha commencement of thc~ activiry authorized by th3s
ra~olu~ion, or £inal buildi.nq ~:id zoning inspections whichevor occurs
first, Condition ~Ios. 2 and 7, above-mentionod, sliall be comp?.ied wi~h.
].0. ::hat approval af th;.s a}~~li.cation constitutas approval of the proposed
request only to the c:xtont that ar comp].ies with rhe Anaheim t4uniaipal
Zoning Code and sny nther appl3.cable City requl~tions. Approval doos not
include any acCi.on or findings as to compliance or approval of the
request regarding any c~thor a~aplicablo ordinance, ra~gulatian or
roqv.irement.
RE IT FURTHER Rh:SOLVF.D ~hat the Anaheim City Planninq Commission
~aes heroby find ar.d dotermine t}~at adoptinn of this Res~lution is oxpressly
predicated upon applicant's compliancd with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set £or•th. Should any such conditions, or any part thRr~oE, be
daclared invalid or unenforceuF~;c~ by the final judymant of any court oE
competent jurisdictioz~, then tl~is Resolution, ~ind bny appxovals herein
containQU, shall be deemod null and void.
7'FiF: FORFGOTNG RESOLUTI027 is siqnQd and approved by me t:~is 5th day
of June, 1989.
~~i i~
,
~`,' ~.-':~?:' f ~~ <<r~*!.,
.~____ .~. ,L-, _ ~~
CtiATFWOMAN, ANhHF.IM CZTY PLANNTNG CONQYSISSI01~
,
ATTEST: ~
.
_~~ '~----- /.{~`~~ l'`~r~. ----
S.F,CRETAR;C, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C0~4~tISSION
S'PATE ~JF rALIFOkNIA )
COUi7•TY Oi ORANGE ) :~s.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
Z, Edith L. 1[arris, Secretary of th8 Anaheim City Planning
l'omrr.is~.ton, d~ herebvi certify t2~at the f~regoinq resulution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of th~ Anaheim Cl~ty Planninq Commission held. on June 5,
1989, by l.he follawing vote of tho mQmbers thereof:
AYESs COMMISSInN~R5: BOUAS, BOYbSTUN, CARUSY[,LO, PELpHAUS, HERBST,
ME5SE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONC's
Af3S~NT: COA4dISSIONBRS: MC HURN~Y
IN WZTNESS WNER~i1E', I have hereunto set my hand this 5th Hoy of
Juue, 1989.
_ _--~~~-u-~, ~°•-_~~~ _.~..
SECRETARY, 71NAHEIM CITY PGA2JN1t7G COMMIuSION
-3- PC 89-157
,; ~