Resolution-PC 89-167~
' RESQLZJTT~N NO,,~PC$~ ~,¢~
~
~ } "~' ' i 'E", ii.`,
A RESOLUTIQN QF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSTON
TIiA7.' PETITION FOR CQI~llTTIONAL US~ PERMI7' N0. 31'14 BE GRANTE;D, IN PART
WHERFAS, tho Anaheam City Planning Commissiox~ did rgceivo a verit,iscl
P9tition for Canditional Uso F~oxmit trom K r'1ND D PROPERT:TES, 2691 E. Tg£t
Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92806, owner and THOMAS E. STGINFELD, 2182 12a1eigh
;;, Av~nue, Costa Me~a, CA 92627, agent for cer~ain real property situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, Statie of Califorr_ia, c~esr,ribed as:
PARCEL 2 IbT THE CITY OF ANAHFIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CALIFOkNIA, AS SHOWN bN A.I~AP FILED IN BAOIC
200, PAGES 9 AND 20 OF PARCRL MAPS, ItT THE QE'FICE OF
THE COUNT.Y RECORDER OF OkAN'GE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the City P.lax~niny Cammis~ion did hold a public hearzng ati
' the Civic Chnter in th~ Cxty of Anah~im an Juxie 19, 1989 ak 1:30 p.m., notice
~' af sazd public hearing having baen duly given as required by 7.aw and in
'i a~aordance with the provision~ of th~ Anaheim Mu;lacipal Code, Chap~er 18.03,
~ to hear and consider evzdence for and ayainst said propnsed conditional use
perm3.t and to investigata and make .f3.ndings IIT1L~ recommendations in connoctiorl
„ ~I~erewith; ancl
WHEREAS, said Commission, afLer clue inspection, inv~~tigation and
study made ~y iLsolf ard in it3 ba'ha1P, an~3 afte~r flue consideration. of a11
eva.dence and reporta offRred at said haaring, does f?nd and determinQ the
following £acts:
1. That ~he pctitioner requco~s approval of a conditiox-al u~e
permit under r~utharity of Code Sections 18.61.05U.070, 18.61.a50.5G2 and
18.61.050.514 to perr.~it the congtruction of ofiEice and sl-.orage bui~dinr~s
' w~thin an existi.ng cantractor's aL•arnge yard and maintRnancs faciliL•y, anci
with waivers of the f~llowing:
(Aj SECTTON ]_$s~¢Z.06.~,,Q.l_1 - t~inim~xm. st~uc t~i~....~e~back.
(b) ~ r~._~~,..4~~Q3.Q - ~?~.~~.~~~~~r~.aE outdo4r uses..
(6 fqot h~,qh ~~i~ li~ f.ence w.~th rg¢wood ~r
ce~ar slats roqui.red; ¢~foot hiq~un31&tk~
F fQny~~ oxisting)
2. That Lhe rerue~ted waiver (a) 3s hereby denied on the basis
that revised plans ware submitted subs~quent t~ public notification,
aliminating the neQd for the waivar.
3. That the requested waivor is 2~ereby gra~~ted on the basis that
there are special cireumstanc.es applicabl~s to the property such a~s sixc~,
sh~ge, ~apography, location and surr~undings which do nut applx to other
identically zoned prope:ty in *he same vir.inity; and that strict application
of the Zon'.ng Code deprives the property of privileg~s enjoyed by ather
pr.opertios in the identical zone c~nd clas~iEica~ion in the vi.cinity.
f:`,' ,
09A9r -1- ~C 89-167
,,.
:'~
,:~~;.
•,~,
`~' c ,r" •t; ~ ~
„ •~,1~:;
~
~
c,~~
^ t;,~(~
`?,k'~
'S
,`;
4. That tl,e propasc~d uso will not ndver~ely affe~t the adjoining
land usos and thQ qrowth and development of the ax•ea in which 3t is proposed
to ba locat~ad.
5. That the ~ize and shape 4f the sz~e proposad ~Et:r the use is
adequate ta a~'low the fu11 dev~lopment of the proposed use .in a manner no~
detrimtintal to the partir.ular araa nor Y.o the peace, health, safety axid
general wel~are of th~ Citizens of the City o£ Ar~ah~im.
6. That the grant:ing of the Conditional Use Porm3C under the
cor_ditions impo3ed, if nny, will not be detrzmen'tal to the peace, heaZth,
safety and general k~elfare of the Citizens of the Cit.y of Anahoim.
7. That the traffic generater~ by the proposed use wi1J. not impose
+~n unda.e burden upon the streots and highways designoa and imProved to carry
ths CraEfic in thQ area.
8. That no or,c~ indicated the.'.r presence at said public hearing in
npposition; and that no correspondsnce ws;s received in opposition to the
subject petition.
~L~FORNIA ENVIRONhtFNTAL Q~;1A'L TY ~T FINDLN : That tihe Anaheim
Cit,y Yianning Commission has reviewed the proposal to perm.it lhs cons~ruction
of office and storage buildinys within an existing cantr.act;or's storage ya~~d
and maintenance facility with waivers of minianum structural setback and
required enclosure of oiitdoor uses on an irregu].arly•-shapea parcel oE l~nd
consistxnq a~ appcoximately 2.5 acres having a fror-kage of appr~ximat,eiy 394
~ fee~ on the wor,t side of Lewis ~t;reet, l3aving ~ maximum depth ~f.
approximate:~y 203 feek, beinc~ located appruximc:ctely y15 feQt north af ti:s
cQnterline of Cerrita~ Avenue and f.urt:ier described as 142Q SouL•h Allec
Street; and does hereby ap~rove the Nogative naa:lara~taon upon finding ~hat it
has conaidered the Negative Declaration tog~ther wi~h any comments rece3ved
; d~:ring the pvblic revie~v pro~cess and further finaxng on the basis of the
initial study and any comments received that there is; no substantic~l eviderice
tk~at tt~,a project will hava ~s s.igsiificant effsct on the environment.
NOV~, TFiEREFORE, DE TT RESOLVED L-hat the AnaL~eim City 1P1ann.ing
Cun-mission does hereby granL subject Peritiori Eor Conditional'Us~ Permit,
upon the folloaing condiCions whioh are hsreby €ound ta be a ndcessary
prerequisi~e ro ths pro~osed uso of the aubject groperry in order to preserve
the aafe~y and gene~s~1 w~~.fare of ~he Citizens af Lhe City pf Annh~.im:
^~r
1. That. water metora sha11 be ~laced i.n a location easily 3cr.essib~.e during
normal work3ng hours (:~ot noressarily on Allec Stree~), and shall be
subjQCt L•o the prior approval of th~ Water Engineering Division.
'L. 1'hat fire sprinklers shall be installed as required by the City Fi•re ';~~
Departmenk. ';'
3. That prior. to c~mmencement of stru~tural framing, on-site fire hydrants ~
shall be ins:.alled ~nd chf~rgQd as required aud approved by the C3.ty Fire "
Depa: L•menh,.
4. That thQ owner/applicant sha11 p:ovide separate fire water service for
the parcel (backflow preventoc). ;'t
,,
-2- PC89-167 ,
, ~~~~~ti~~
---:i"_'rtY ~
~;1 m. ,~~ . .. : ....... . . ..... ... . .... .. ,.
__ , +. . ._
~•.
r v ~ r iY,.'
,~ ,p~"'1~ ~~ ~,Yi
~l"
~ . e;' , ~ :i9
;:~i
';i
~ 5. That an adequnte, unob5tructecl fire txuak ~urn-around aroa stiall be
provi3ed on-site as roqu.ixed by and approvad by the Cit;y FirQ Dr~partment. ~
6. That subject proposal authurized by th's resolu~ion shaZl be servoc3 hy
underground utilities.
7. That prior to issuance of a builcting permit, the appropriate ~raf£ic
signal assessmQnt fee shal~ be paid to the City of 1~naheim in aa amount
a~ esr.ablished by Ci.ty Counc~l r~:;4lution.
8. ThAt subject property sha11 b~ developaa siibstant~.ally in accordance
with plans and specificdticns on f.ile with the Citx of. Anaheim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 througli 4.
9. That thp own~r of sub~ect praperty shall submii: a lei:ter requesting
termin~tion of Condi.tional Use Permit No. 2668 to the Zoning Uivision.
10, That prior Lo issuance of. a bui].dxng permit or within a period of one
(1) year from the date of this resolu~ion, whichever occurs Eirst,
Condition Nos. 7 and 9, above-mentioned, shall be compliod with.
Exteusion~ for fur~her time to complete said cunditions may be granked
in accordancF with Section 18.03.090 oE the Anaheim Muni~ipal Code.
I1, Tha~ prior t~ final building and zoninq inspectian3, Condi.tion Nos. 1,
2, 4, 5, 6 and 8, above-mentiuned, sh~11 be complieci with.
12. Tha~ approval of this applicatioii cor.stztutes ap~roval of tY-e propnsed
request o:ily to the ext~ent that it complies witlz the~ Aiaaheim Munici~al
Zoning Cod~ and any other appJ.i.cabl~ Cit,y requlations. A~~roval does
not include any action or findirigs as t~ compiiance or approval ~f tho
request regardinq any oth~x appl.icable ordinan~;~, rc~~rulati~in or
requir.ement.
BE IT P'URTHER RESO'LVED thaC tn~: Anaheim ~~ity P'lanning Cammzssion ~io~s
hereby Eind and dotermix~e that adopti~n c~ *.hi.s R~;;olutic~n is ~xpressly~
preciicated uron applicant's complir~nr,e T~;ii:,; vaci~ and all of the condiCions
hereanabovo set forth. Should any suc.:i condikioz~s, or any pt~r.t thereof, be
decl3red invalid or unenfarcaable by the final judqment of auy court of
~, r.ompeten~ jurisdiction, then this Re:.olution, anci any appr~v~ls herein
contained, shall bc~ doemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RRSOLUTION is siqned and approved by mQ this 19th day oF
J'une, 1989.
~, , . ~
~. •~C : :j'~~~ ..~-b ~ ~ ~e~%'%f~t~.
CHRTRFIOMAN~AIIEIM CITY PL~123NING CO2+~SISSION
~
ATTEST: ~~ ~ ~
_ ~ .~_.1-G~z~
~=Q
uECRETARY, ANAHEIbS CITY PLANNING CGMMISSIGN
-3- PC89-167
'«
"i~.
~'~~
-';~
~ ~ ~ i '
~`~~it~w . w,. .. .._a
Y
uTATF OF ~A,i,:(FORI3IA
~
~.r
: ~ ' : ~~1 i d i 1 ~~la~fllN~~'
'~:~. +;i~4~ry~y~
U'~ . . . ~ f~l~,
COUNTX OF ORA2dGE J s~ . `;:;r
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) '`'~
l!
i~.
I, Edii:h L. Harri~, Socretary o~' the Anaheim City Pl~nning Commisaion, ,
da hsreby cartify that the forogoing reaolution was ~assed and adopted a~ a „s"-'r,.
meeting of the Anaheim City Planxiing Commisfiioxi held on June 19, 19R9, by tre "i
£ollowin~ vote oE the memherE thereo~: ,~
AYES: COMMISSI(?27ER5: BtiL1AS, BOYDSTUN, CARUSILLn, F~LDHAL'S, HERBST, :~
~`~C B[TRNEY, MESSE
NOESt CUMMISSTQNER5: NUNE
AIISENT: CCIMMISSIpNERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHER~.dF,~ I have hereunto set my hand tlzis 19th ~1ay of ```
;;une. 1989.
~a --~ . /;,~' i
ca 4C.. ~l ~~~"
SECRETA.RY, ?~NAFIETM CITY PLANNING CUMMISSrON
~;;'~
- , .;,t
• ,>i:
;,'~
,";~
:~!.
:'13
~~~i~
z1~N
~'~~+f~
~s';`~
i. u'
~~
.~yt
~3,
~y4y~~~
''.'!S'
~jnr.. .. .. .
'rI ~
&"~~'1'.A ~ .~, . .. . .
-4-
. . . . .. .. . ~. A~~
~;j
.- aa„'
I~.
PC89-167 ~~
F{
r~ ~~.
, .i
'tyU,~
r~
y c
~ ,~~
':; ~