Resolution-PC 89-185„
~~
RE~ TIQN NG__,__k~~89--18~
~'~
A RESOLUTIOIv OF THE ANAFIEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSTON
APPROVING S.P~CIFIC PLANS FOR COI3DITTON~eL USE PEFhlIT N0. 2g45
Wfi~RSAS, tY,e Anaheim Ciky PlannincJ Commissipn did recei.v~e a f.rorn the
potitiuner, IIurger Fir,r restaurant, far apgroval of. spoci~'ic plans ~or the
third of three 3rive-through r~staurAnts which were conceptually approved hy
the City ~ouncil under Canclirional Use Permit No. 2845 anra Var3ance IJa. 3603
anc~ which rostaurarit include~ the addition of 315 squars fee~ tb ti~~
previously ~i~proved 2, l0U sqiiare f.oot rQS~auranL•; and:
WHERE~,S, the CitX Planning Commissian did hold a publ ic hearings at
the Civic Ceriter in the City o~ Aiiah~im on Jiily 5, 1G13g~ ati 1;30 p.m., nokicQ
of said public Yiearings having boen duly giv~n a~ required by 1aw and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim I~unicipal Code~ ChaptQr lg,p3~
to h~ar ar~d consider evidence for and a~a:inst said pr~posed spacific plans for
subjecr conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings arad
r.ecemm~ndat~ons in connectioii therewith; arid said petition was continued ~o
the mae~.ing o£ Jtt1y 17. 1.gg9: and
~.'rIEREAS, said Commi..,s.i.on, aff:er due ins~ecrion, inve~tigaL•ion and
study made by itself aizd in its behalf, and a1Et~r due consideration oE aJl
eviclence and repc~rL•s offered at sazd hearing, does find and determine the
~nlluwing f~:cts:
7. Tha~ Cot~aitinn No. 5 0£ Resolution N~. 86R-b26 rec~uires that
the Planning Commission review and ~apiirove speciEic plans Eor ths drive
through re~taurants prior t;o the issuance oL• building permi~~.
z• That L•he specific p].an, for subjact drive-through restaurant
which was conceptu~lly approved by the City Couricil under Conditional Use
I?ermit No. 2845 (Res~lution No. 86R-526), and which includos the addition oE
315 square~ f.yet to the previ~usly approved 2,100 squar.e fo~t restaurant are
substant~.ally in ~:anfox•mance with the previous a~proval.
3• That no one indicated their presence a~ said public hearinq ii~
opposition; anci that no corxesponclencc~ was rec~ived in o~pusii:ion to subiect
petition.
~L7F I2N~A ENVTRONMEtJ~'AL~~zTY AC'T FINDIN :
Planning Commission does hersby find that the re-v~iou,,l hA a tiho Anaheim City
Declarat.i.on appro~ed ,in r.onjunctiion with Condztional Use YPerirp t`No. r28 5 1is
adequat~ to serve as environmental documQntation for th~ proposed project.
TFiE FOkEGOING RE~OLUTJON is s.iyne~ and approved by me h.his '17th d~y
of July. 1985. ~::
____;~,'~:~~ ,~' , f ~~
~ --~-~_ ==~-z. : ~' ..~L~
CHAIRMI~T, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CU'~II~IISSTON
ATTEST: ,
-- t=~=~ ._. ~.-~.~
S6CRETALt , ANAHETM CITY PLANN NG CObIIQISSION
U960r
-1-
~y~',.
,iP9~j~Yf y' 'i ~ i ~
1'C89-'1C5
i
i'
~;;
..
;:
~~ :~
~''^~,
~
t,. ~,~ it~~~.~
~ ~~~~ ~„ ;,;:ti~
;~~
,:,4,
;n
;~.
cY
S'l'AT.E OF CALIF'ORNIA ) s
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CTTX f?F' ANAHEIM ) ~
~
I, Edith L. Flarrzs, 5earetary of hhc~ Ar,aheam City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that thQ farogoing resolution was passed and
adaptecl at a mQeting ot the Anahexm CitX Ylanning Commission held on JuYy ~.7,
19A9, by tiae fo.llowirig vote of the membr~rs thereof: `r~~
'u
A'YFS: COMMISSIOc7EFtS; $OL1AS, BOYDST.UI3, CARUSILLQ, FEi.,DHAU5, HERBST,
1.
MESSE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABS~NT: COMMISS:[ONERS: MC BURNEY
+f
IN WTTNEfiS WHEREOr, I have liereunto sel: my Y~and this 17~h day o.f
July. 1989.
~" ~
~~_ `J ~ ^ . .,.',;:
~! c ~~,+~~~ , ~
SEGRGTAIt , ANAFiF:fM CITY FLANNINC COMMISSION
;;r
~i
r,
,. ~
i.: ,
-Z-
Pca9-iss
; ,e~
,_,~
;,;`
~;;~
;;f~
.. ,,,
_ ~:.~