Loading...
PC 2021/11/08.pdf City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Monday, November 8, 2021 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California • Chairperson: Natalie Meeks • Chairperson Pro-Tempore: Dave Vadodaria • Commissioners: Kimberly Keys, Lucille Kring, LuisAndres Perez, Steve White • Call To Order - 5:00 p.m. • Pledge Of Allegiance • Roll Call • Items of Public Interest Oath or Affirmation of Allegiance: Swearing in of Planning Commissioner Phillip Wolfgramm • Appreciation Plaque presented to Commissioner Keys • Public Comments • Public Hearing Items • Commission Updates • Discussion • Adjournment For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary. A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday, November 8, 2021, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the Planning and Building Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, during regular business hours. You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net November 8, 2021 Page 2 of 5 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations, Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M. Public Comments This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or provide public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items. November 8, 2021 Page 3 of 5 Public Hearing Items ITEM NO. 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06104 AND DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00157 (DEV2021-00118) Location: 2666 West Lincoln Boulevard Request: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit and a determination of public convenience or necessity to permit the sales of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption (Type 21 Off-Sale General ABC License) in conjunction with an existing convenience store. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Thomas Gorham tgorham@anaheim.net November 8, 2021 Page 4 of 5 ITEM NO. 3 SANTA ANA RIVER REORGANIZATION (DEV2021-00203) Location: The subject properties are located within City of Orange along the Santa Ana River from approximately 1,000 feet south of Katella Avenue to 1,000 feet south of Orangewood Avenue, east of the Anaheim/Orange city boundary to the top of the western levee of the Santa Ana River. Request: A City-initiated General Plan Amendment and Zoning Reclassification to facilitate the realignment of a portion of the municipal boundary between the City of Anaheim and City of Orange along the Santa Ana River, north and south of Orangewood Avenue. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider if an addendum to the previously certified Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, and its subsequent addenda, is the appropriate environmental documentation to comply with CEQA. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Charles Guiam CMGuiam@anaheim.net Adjourn to Monday, November 22, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. November 8, 2021 Page 5 of 5 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: 2 p.m. November 4, 2021 (TIME) (DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK Z SIGNED: ___________________ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning and Building Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 8:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 8:00 de la mañana un día hábil antes de la reunión programada. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: November 8, 2021 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06104; PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00157 LOCATION: 2666 West Lincoln Boulevard (Amerigo Market) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Joseph Ismael, and the property owner is Shawn Slayton Trust. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit and a determination of public convenience or necessity to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption (Type 21 Off-Sale General ABC License) in conjunction with an existing convenience store. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities), and approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06104 and Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2021-00157 subject to the recommended conditions of approval. BACKGROUND: The 1,753 square foot convenience store is located within a 5,781 square foot multi-tenant one-story commercial building on a 20,766 square foot property. In addition to the convenience store, a bar and a restaurant occupy the building. The property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone, and the General Plan designates this property for Residential-Low Medium land uses. The property is surrounded by the following land uses: North: Commercial retail and multi-family residential South: Single-family and multi-family residential West: Multi-family residential East: A motel and multi-family residential The applicant proposes the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises (off-sale) consumption, which requires approval of a conditional use permit pursuant to the Section 18.08.030 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC). In addition, a determination of public convenience or necessity is required for this application because this property is located within a census tract with a crime rate above the citywide average. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06104; PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00157 November 8, 2021 Page 2 of 9 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the sale of alcoholic beverages (beer, wine, and spirits) for off-premises (off-sale) consumption in conjunction with an existing 1,753 square foot convenience store. The State of California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) will require a Type 21 Off-Sale General ABC License which are issued for grocery stores, markets, and convenience stores. The existing convenience store currently sells a range of everyday items including snack foods, bottled beverages, groceries, over-the-counter medications, and toiletries. In addition, the store offers notary services and DMV registration services. The convenience store’s existing hours of operation are 10:00 am to 10:00 pm daily and would stay the same as part of the subject proposal. As indicated on the floor plan below, the display of beer and other malt beverages would occur in two coolers. The display of spirits would occur behind the service counter/register area and only be accessible to store personnel. In addition, alcoholic beverages not on display would be stored in the storage room that would not be accessible to the public. The total percentage of store floor area that would be dedicated to alcohol display is around 10 percent. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06104; PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00157 November 8, 2021 Page 3 of 9 Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this Zoning Code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06104; PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00157 November 8, 2021 Page 4 of 9 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Convenience stores with the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit in the General Commercial (C-G) zone to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses, and to ensure that the use would not be detrimental to the general health and safety of the community. Through the conditional use permit process, conditions of approval may be imposed to ensure that the subject use would operate in a manner that does not create nuisances, affect the general health and welfare of the community, and not adversely affect surrounding properties. Typical nuisances that may be associated with alcohol sales include loitering, public drunkenness, graffiti, noise, and trash. Staff has reviewed the subject application in detail, visited the site, and has spoken to the applicant regarding the proposed use. In addition, the subject application was reviewed by internal City departments including the Anaheim Police Department and Code Enforcement. As noted above, the subject convenience store is located in a retail center that includes a bar and a restaurant. The restaurant does not sell alcoholic beverages. The bars hours of operation vary, but is generally in operation daily from the afternoon until 1:30 am – 2:00 am. As outlined on the site plan, the subject property is a corner lot and has parking in front of the building as well behind the building. The rear parking is enclosed with a wrought iron fence and gate that is closed after hours. There is no landscaping on the subject property, and the building contains various signage including illuminated cabinet wall signs, painted wall signs, a free-standing pole sign, banners and window signs. The Anaheim Police Department and the Code Enforcement Division has indicated that the subject property and the immediate area has had issues with graffiti, loitering, and transients. The applicant has worked pro-actively with both Police and Code Enforcement to address these issues. At the suggestion of Code Enforcement, the applicant installed the fence and gate at the rear of the property to help keep out transients in the rear parking lot after hours. In addition, the applicant has help to abate graffiti on the building. View of subject property looking south from Lincoln Avenue In its review of the subject application and proposed use, staff has identified a number of issues related to the subject property, the existing convenience store, and the proposed sale of alcoholic CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06104; PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00157 November 8, 2021 Page 5 of 9 beverages that should be addressed through conditions of approval of the subject conditional use permit. These include the following: Signage: As noted above the subject building includes numerous signs including a number of nonconforming signs. The subject convenience store has extensive window signs that occupy more than 20% maximum of the window area permitted by the AMC. Further, the existing wall signage above the storefront includes a stencil painted “Market” sign and a list of services stenciled on the wall. In addition, a cabinet sign for “Sara’s Boutique” which previously occupied a portion of the subject tenant space and is no longer in business remains. There are also unpermitted banner signs. Staff has included in the draft resolution a condition of approval to address the nonconforming signage. The condition requires the following: View of Existing Signage • Within 30 days following the approval of the conditional use permit, the applicant shall remove the existing “Sara’s Boutique” cabinet sign, remove any non-permitted banner signs, and remove all nonconforming window signage. • Within 60 days following the approval of the conditional use permit the applicant shall remove the existing stencil painted signs and install a code compliant permanent wall sign above the storefront, subject to review and approval of the Planning and Building Department. • Window signs shall comply with the maximum area allowed by the Zoning Code. At no time shall window signs exceed 20% of the window area. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06104; PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00157 November 8, 2021 Page 6 of 9 Unpermitted Use: The applicant runs a U-Haul truck rental business out of the subject convenience store. Staff has observed and site photos confirm that rental trucks and vehicles are routinely parked in the subject parking lot. The AMC requires a conditional use permit to operate a vehicle rental facility in the CG zone. Staff has included in the draft resolution a condition of approval to address the unpermitted use. The condition requires the following: • The vehicle rental business operated by the applicant shall cease operations immediately, and all rental vehicles shall be removed from the subject property until and unless the applicant applies for and secures approval of a conditional use permit. Landscaping. As noted, the subject property is void of any on-site landscaping. In order to visually enhance the subject property staff recommends a condition of approval that the applicant work with the property owner to install some landscaping on the subject site. The condition requires the following: • The applicant shall encourage and work with the property owner to install and continuously maintain onsite landscaping including drought tolerant plants and replace in a timely manner in the event that said landscaping is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Within 90 days of approval of this conditional use permit, the applicant shall provide Planning staff written evidence of efforts and progress to install landscaping on-site. Operations: In order to ensure that the sale of alcoholic beverages does not does not create nuisances, affect the general health and welfare of the community, and not adversely affect surrounding properties; a number of operational conditions are included in the draft resolution. These include the following: • The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the storefront and the parking area and shall install and maintain a trash receptacle in front of the storefront.. • The area of alcoholic beverage displays shall not exceed 25% of the total display area in the store and shall be consistent with the floor plan approved as part of the subject conditional use permit. • The petitioner shall store all hard alcohol on shelves behind the cash register. • The business shall operate only between the hours of 10:00 am and 10:00 pm. • The sales of beer or malt beverages in quantities of quarts, 22 oz., 32 oz., 40 oz., or similar size containers is prohibited. No beer or malt beverages shall be sold in quantities of less than a pre-packaged three pack per sale. • The display and sale of airplane service sized bottles of alcohol (approximately 50 milliliters in size) shall be prohibited. • The operator shall lock the beer cabinets at 4:00 pm and have an employee assist with purchase after 4:00 pm. • There shall be no display of alcoholic beverages located outside of the store or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to the store. • The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers and the consumption of alcoholic beverages are prohibited on or around the premises. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06104; PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00157 November 8, 2021 Page 7 of 9 • Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours. • The Petitioner(s) shall police the area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons around the premises. • There shall be no pay to play amusement machines or video game devices maintained upon the premises at any time. • There shall be no exterior advertising or sign of any kind or type, including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages or signs which are clearly visible to the exterior shall constitute a violation of this condition. • Managers/Owners shall contact the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program), RBS, or similar certificate training for themselves and register employees. • The Petitioner(s) shall post and maintain a professional quality sign facing the premises parking lot(s) that reads as follows: NO LOITERING, NO LITTERING NO DRINKING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO ARREST The sign shall be at least two feet square with two-inch block lettering. The sign shall be in English and Spanish. Monitoring and Compliance: In order to ensure and monitor compliance with any imposed conditions of approval and monitor operations of the proposed use, staff has included a recommended condition of approval that requires the following: • Planning and Code Enforcement staff shall conduct an inspection of the subject site at six months and one year following the effective date of the conditional use permit approval and/or as determined as necessary before or thereafter. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Division a written summary of compliance with all applicable conditions six months and one year following the effective date of the conditional use permit approval for review by the Planning and Building Director. If it is determined that the applicant is not complying with said conditions and/or it is determined that the proposed use is creating a nuisance, affecting the health and safety of the community, and/or having an adverse impact on the surrounding land uses the Planning Director pursuant to AMC Section 18.60.200 – Revocation or Modification of Permits, may initiate revocation or modification of the subject conditional use permit and schedule a hearing before the Planning Commission and/or City Council for consideration of revocation and/or modification. Traffic: Access to the site is provided by a driveway off Lincoln Avenue and Stinson Street. The traffic generated by the proposed use would not impose an undue burden on streets and highways in the area. It is not expected that the addition of off-site alcohol sales to the existing convenience store would increase the traffic load from what currently exists on the site. Effect on adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area: The proposed project does not involve any new construction or expansion of the existing convenience store. The existing hours of operation 10:00 am to 10:00 pm daily would remain the same. The existing parking lot will not change as a result of the proposed use nor will the proposed use increase the demand for parking. As such and with implementation of the recommended conditions of approval, the CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06104; PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00157 November 8, 2021 Page 8 of 9 Planning Commission should determine if the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety. Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN): State law limits the issuance of new alcohol sales licenses when a license is requested in a police reporting district with a crime rate above the City average or when there is an overconcentration in the number of ABC licenses within a census tract. A determination of Public Convenience or Necessity is required for this application because this property is located within a reporting district with a crime rate above the City average. State law also states that such restrictions can be waived if the local jurisdiction makes a determination that the proposed business would serve "public convenience or necessity." The subject location is in Census Tract Number 870.01 which has a population of 5,537. This population allows for 7 on-sale Alcoholic Beverage Control licenses and there are presently 2 licenses in the tract. It also allows for 3 off-sale licenses and there are presently no licenses in the tract. This subject location is within Police Reporting District 1717 which is 133% above the city average in crime. There have been many calls for service to this location in the last year, the owner has been very pro-active in calling the police to assist him in cleaning up the transient and loitering issue that exists in the area. The ¼ mile radius surrounding this location is 207% above the city average in crime. The calls for service primarily consisted of: 41 vandalisms, 109 petty thefts, 38 burglaries, and 43 simple assaults. As outlined in the applicant’s justification letter (Attachment No. 3) there is one other business which sells alcohol in the immediate area, Stagecoach Liquor located at 2701 West Lincoln Avenue immediately north of the subject property. The applicant contends that Stagecoach Liquor is not easily reachable for patrons traveling in vehicles from the south or walking to the site. The applicant further contends that patrons often illegally and unsafely cross Lincoln Avenue which often has heavy traffic, in order to reach said store. The applicant’s justification for public convenience or necessity states that the approval of a liquor license for his convenience store would be a convenience to the public by providing them with a closer location to purchase alcohol that is more easily and safely reachable by foot and by patrons in vehicles coming from the neighborhood to the south. In addition, the applicant has submitted a petition (Attachment No. 5) with signatures of his customers supporting the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the subject convenience store. Based on staff’s review and the conditions of approval proposed for this permit, staff supports the request for Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity. Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). The Class 1 exemption consists of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of the use beyond that existing at the time of this determination. The proposed project is a request to allow the offsite sale of alcoholic beverages in CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06104; PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00157 November 8, 2021 Page 9 of 9 conjunction with an existing convenience store. The proposal does not include any physical changes to the building or the property that staff anticipates would result in a significant impact on the environment. Therefore, staff has determined that this would be a negligible expansion of the existing use. Pursuant to Section 15300.2 (c) and 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project would be categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: Subject to the recommended conditions of approval, staff believes that the proposed sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the existing convenience store for off- site consumption would be compatible with surrounding uses and the general vicinity, would not be detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety of the community, and would provide a public convenience or necessity. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the Draft Conditional Use Permit Public Convenience or Necessity Resolution (Attachment No. 1) and the recommended conditions of approval contained therein. Prepared by, Submitted by, Thomas Gorham Niki Wetzel, AICP Contract Planner Deputy Director of Planning and Building Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Public Convenience or Necessity Resolution 2. Applicant Letter of Request 3. Applicant Letter of Public Convenience or Necessity 4. Police Memorandum 5. Applicant Submitted Petition 6. Project Plans C-G DEV 2021-00118 RETAIL T SO UTHERN CALI FO RNIA EDISON CO. EASEMENT RM-4 MOROCCO APARTMENTS 35 DU RM-4 APARTMENTS 56 DU RM-4 APARTMENTS 56 DU RM-3 CONDOMINIUMS/ TOWNHOUSES 41 DU T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. EASEMENT RM-4 APARTMENTS 70 DU C-G CAR WASH C-G RETAIL C-G RETAIL C-G RETAIL C-G RETAIL RM-2 CONDOS 95 DU RM-2 CONDOS 95 DU RM-4 CONDO 34 DU T NURSERY OS VACANT RM-4 APARTMENTS 42 DU RM-4 APARTMENTS 48 DU T SO UTHERN CALI FO RNIA EDISON CO. EASEMENT O.C.F.C.D. O.C.F.C.D. RM-4 DUPLEX 6 DU RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-4 APARTMENTS 18 DU T CREST MOTEL RM-4 APARTMENTS 63 DU C-G VALENCIA INN RM-4 APARTMENTS 117 DU RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-4 APARTMENTS 26 DU RM-4 APARTMENTS 24 DU RM-4 APARTMENTS 24 DU RM-4 APARTMENTS 18 DU C-G RETAIL O.C.F.C.D. C-G DUPLEX 6 DU RM-4 SFR W LI NC OLN AVE W LINCOLN AVE W S ER EN O PLN LA REINA CIRN NEW LIFE WAYN NEW LIFE WAY W. LINCOLN AVE W. BROADWAY W. ORANGE AVE W. CRESCENT AVE N. DALE AVE. CRESCENT AVE N. MAGNOLIA AVES. BROOKHURST STN. BROOKHURST STW. LINCOLN AVE 1 5 6 0 S o u t h L e w is S t r e e t D E V N o . 2 0 2 1 -0 0 1 1 8 Subject Property APN: 126-031-14 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Ph oto : Ma y 2 02 0 W LI NC OLN AVE W LINCOLN AVE S STINSON STW S ER EN O PLN LA REINA CIRN NEW LIFE WAYN NEW LIFE WAY W. LINCOLN AVE W. BROADWAY W. ORANGE AVE W. CRESCENT AVE N. DALE AVE. CRESCENT AVE N. MAGNOLIA AVES. BROOKHURST STN. BROOKHURST STW. LINCOLN AVE 1 5 6 0 S o u t h L e w is S t r e e t D E V N o . 2 0 2 1 -0 0 1 1 8 Subject Property APN: 126-031-14 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Ph oto : Ma y 2 02 0 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2021-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2021-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06104, AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00157, AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2021-00118) (2666 West Lincoln Boulevard) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve (i) Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06104 and (ii) Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2021-00157 to permit the sales of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption (Type 21 Off-Sale General ABC License) in conjunction with an existing convenience Store (referred to herein as the "Proposed Project"), at a certain real property located at 2666 West Lincoln Boulevard in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 20,766 square feet in area and is developed with an approximately 5,781 square foot multi-tenant one-story commercial building. The subject tenant space is 1,753 square feet in area. The Property is designated for Residential-Low Medium land uses by the Anaheim General Plan. The Property is located in the "CG" Commercial General Zone and is, therefore, subject to the zoning and development standards set forth in Chapter 18.08 Commercial Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (“AMC”); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on November 8, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. and notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the AMC, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06104 and Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2021-00157 and to investigate and make findings and recommendation in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to - 2 - PC2021-*** Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2021- 06104, does find and determine the following: 1. The proposed sales of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption in conjunction with an existing convenience store is an allowable use within the "C-G" General Commercial Zone under Section 18.08.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Code, subject to a conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of the "C-G" General Commercial Zone. 2. The existing 1,753 square foot convenience store is located within a 5,781 square foot multi-tenant one-story commercial building on a 20,766 square foot property. In addition to the convenience store, a bar, and a restaurant that does not sell alcoholic beverages occupy the subject building. The sale of alcoholic beverages (beer, wine, and spirits) for off-premises (off-sale) consumption in conjunction with the existing convenience store will require a Type 21 Off-Sale General License from the State of California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) which are issued for grocery stores, markets, and convenience stores. The existing convenience store currently sells a range of everyday items including snack foods, bottled beverages, groceries, over the counter medications, and toiletries. In addition, the store offers notary services and DMV registration services. The convenience store’s existing hours of operation are 10:00 am to 10:00 pm daily and would stay the same as part of the subject proposal. As indicated on the floor plan, the display of beer and other malt beverages would occur in two coolers. The display of spirits would occur behind the service counter/register area and only be accessible to store personnel. In addition, alcoholic beverages not on display would be stored in the storage room that would not be accessible to the public. The total percentage of store floor area that would be dedicated to alcohol display is around 10 percent. The Project will result in minor alterations to the interior of the store and as required by the conditions of approval, existing nonconforming signs will be abated and new code compliant signage will be installed. Landscaping will be installed on the subject property if feasible. Further, an existing non-permitted vehicle rental use will be abated. As outlined herein and subject to the imposed conditions of approval, the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located. 3. The proposed project does not involve any new construction or expansion of the existing convenience store. The existing hours of operation 10:00 am to 10:00 pm daily would remain the same. The existing parking lot will not change as a result - 3 - PC2021-*** of the proposed use nor will the proposed use increase the demand for parking. With implementation of the conditions of approval, the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety. 4. The traffic generated by the use proposed under the conditions imposed, will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways. Adequate access to the site is provided by driveways off Lincoln Avenue and Stinson Street. The addition of off- site alcohol sales to the existing convenience store would not increase the traffic load from what currently exists on the site. 5. The granting of the conditional use permit to allow the off-site sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction within an existing convenience store subject to the conditions of approval imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of Anaheim and will provide an added convenience to the immediate neighborhood. Conditions imposed on the project will ensure that potential nuisances associated with the proposed use will be minimized, and the use would compatible with surrounding land uses. Further, Staff shall conduct an inspection of the subject site at six months and one year following the effective date of the conditional use permit approval or as deemed necessary, and the applicant shall submit to the Planning Division a written summary of compliance with all applicable conditions at six months and one year following the effective date of the conditional use permit approval for review by the Planning Director. If it is determined that the applicant is not complying with said conditions and/or it is determined that the proposed use is creating a nuisance, affecting the health and safety of the community, and/or having an adverse impact on the surrounding land uses the Planning Director pursuant to AMC Section 18.60.200 – Revocation or Modification of Permits, may initiate revocation or modification of the subject conditional use permit and schedule a hearing before the Planning Commission and/or City Council for consideration of revocation and/or modification; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2021-00157, does find and determine the following facts: 1. On July 11, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95R-134 establishing procedures and delegating certain responsibilities to the Planning Commission relating to the determination of "Public Convenience or Necessity" on those certain applications requiring that such determination be made by the local governing body pursuant to applicable provisions of the Business and Professions Code, and prior to the issuance of a license by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control ("ABC"). 2. Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code provides that the ABC shall deny an application for a license if issuance of that license would tend to create a law enforcement problem, or if issuance would result in or add to an "undue concentration" of licenses, except when an applicant has demonstrated that "public convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance of a license. For purposes of - 4 - PC2021-*** Section 23958.4, "undue concentration" means the case in which the Property is located in an area where any of the following conditions exist: (a) The Property is located in a crime reporting district that has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes than the average number of “reported crimes” (as defined in Section 23958.4), as determined from all crime reporting districts within the City of Anaheim. (b) As to on-sale retail license applications, the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the Property is located exceeds the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the county in which the applicant premises are located. (c) As to off-sale retail license applications, the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the Property is located exceeds the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the county. 3. Notwithstanding the existence of the above-referenced conditions, ABC may issue a license if the Planning Commission determines that the "public convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance. 4. Resolution No. 95R-134 authorizes the City of Anaheim Police Department to make recommendations related to "public convenience or necessity" determinations; and, when the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption is permitted by the Code, said recommendations shall take the form of conditions of approval to be imposed on the determination in order to ensure that the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages does not adversely affect any adjoining land use or the growth and development of the surrounding area. 5. The subject location is in Census Tract Number 870.01, which has a population of 5,537. This population allows for 7 on-sale Alcoholic Beverage Control licenses and there are presently 2 licenses in the tract. It also allows for 3 off-sale licenses and there are presently no licenses in the tract. This subject location is within Police Reporting District 1717, which is 133% above the city average in crime. There have been many calls for service to this location in the last year; the owner has been very pro-active in calling the police to assist him in cleaning up the transient and loitering issue that exists in the area. The ¼-mile radius surrounding this location is 207% above the city average in crime. Since the crime rate is above the citywide average, a determination of "public convenience or necessity" is required. 6. The request to permit alcoholic beverage sales for off-premises consumption in conjunction with a convenience store subject to the conditions of approval imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of Anaheim would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed and will provide an added convenience to the immediate neighborhood. Conditions imposed on the project will ensure that potential nuisances associated with the proposed use will be minimized, and the use would compatible to surrounding land uses. Further, Staff shall conduct an inspection of the subject site at six - 5 - PC2021-*** months and one year following the effective date of the conditional use permit approval or as deemed necessary and the applicant shall submit to the Planning Division a written summary of compliance with all applicable conditions at six months and one year following the effective date of the conditional use permit approval for review by the Planning Director. If it is determined that the applicant is not complying with said conditions and/or it is determined that the proposed use is creating a nuisance, affecting the health and safety of the community, and/or having an adverse impact on the surrounding land uses the Planning Director, pursuant to AMC Section 18.60.200 – Revocation or Modification of Permits, may initiate revocation or modification of the subject conditional use permit and schedule a hearing before the Planning Commission and/or City Council for consideration of revocation and/or modification. 7. The determination of "Public Convenience or Necessity" can be made based on the finding that the license requested is consistent with the Planning Commission guidelines for such determinations and further that the granting of the determination of Public Convenience or Necessity, under the conditions imposed, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim, and; WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, this Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06104 and Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2021-00157, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of that portion of the Property for which Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06104 and Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2021-00157 is applicable in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. - 6 - PC2021-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of November 8, 2021. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Laverne Ortiz, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on November 8, 2021, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: - 7 - PC2021-*** IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of November, 2021. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 8 - PC2021-*** - 9 - PC2021-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06104; AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2021-00157 (DEV2021-00118) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the business premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the business owner shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied or discovered by the business owner. Planning & Building Department, Code Enforcement Division 2. The business shall be operated in accordance with the Letter of Request submitted as part of this application. Any changes to the business operation, as described in that document, shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with the Letter of Request and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division 3. The area of alcoholic beverage displays shall not exceed 25% of the total display area in a subject tenant space and shall be consistent with the floor plan approved as part of the subject conditional use permit. Police Department 4. The petitioner shall store all hard alcohol on shelves behind the cash register. Police Department 5. The hours of operation for the subject convenience store shall be 10:00 am to 10:00 pm daily. Police Department Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division 6. The sales of beer or malt beverages in quantities of quarts, 22 oz., 32 oz., 40 oz., or similar size containers is prohibited. No beer or malt beverages shall be sold in quantities of less than a pre-packaged three pack per sale. Police Department Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division 7. The display and sale of airplane service sized bottles of alcohol (approximately 50 milliliters in size) shall be prohibited. Police Department Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division 8. The operator shall lock the beer cabinets at 4:00 pm and have an employee assist with purchase. Police Department 9. No display of alcoholic beverages shall be located outside of a building or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to the building. Police Department - 10 - PC2021-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 10. The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers and the consumption of alcoholic beverages are prohibited on or around these premises. Police Department 11. The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the storefront and the parking area; and shall install a trash receptacle in front of the storefront. Police Department 12. Petitioner(s) shall police the area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons around the premises. Police Department 13. There shall be no pay to play amusement machines or video game devices maintained upon the premises at any time. Police Department 14. There shall be no exterior advertising or sign of any kind or type, including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages or signs which are clearly visible to the exterior shall constitute a violation of this condition. Police Department 15. Managers/Owners shall contact the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program), RBS, or similar certificate training for themselves and register employees. The contact number for ABC is 657-205-3533. Police Department 16. The Petitioner(s) shall post and maintain a professional quality sign facing the premises parking lot(s) that reads as follows: NO LOITERING, NO LITTERING NO DRINKING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO ARREST The sign shall be at least two feet square with two-inch block lettering. The sign shall be in English and Spanish. Police Department 17. There shall be no tables or seating for customers, no serving of meals or beverages on-site, and no sale of open containers, pre-prepared or mixed alcoholic beverages. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 18. The vehicle rental business operated by the applicant shall cease operations immediately and all rental vehicles shall be removed from the subject property until and unless the applicant applies for and secures approval of a conditional use permit. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division 19. Within 30 days following the approval of the conditional use permit, the applicant shall remove the existing Sara’s Boutique” cabinet sign, remove any non-permitted banner signs and remove all nonconforming window signage. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division - 11 - PC2021-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 20. Within 60 days following the approval of the conditional use permit, the applicant shall remove the existing stencil painted signs and install a code compliant permanent wall sign above the storefront, subject to review and approval of the Planning and Building Department. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division 21. Window signs shall comply with the maximum area allowed by the Zoning Code. At no time shall window signs exceed 20% of the window area. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 22. The applicant shall encourage and work with the property owner to install and continuously maintain onsite landscaping including drought tolerant plants and replace in a timely manner in the event that said landscaping is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Within 90 days of approval of this conditional use permit, the applicant shall provide Planning staff written evidence of efforts and progress to install landscaping on-site. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 23. Planning and Code Enforcement staff shall conduct an inspection of the subject site at six months and one year following the effective date of the conditional use permit approval and/or as determined as necessary before or thereafter. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Division a written summary of compliance with all applicable conditions six months and one year following the effective date of the conditional use permit approval for review by the Planning Director. If it is determined that the applicant is not complying with said conditions and/or it is determined that the proposed use is creating a nuisance, affecting the health and safety of the community, and/or having an adverse impact on the surrounding land uses the Planning Director pursuant to AMC Section 18.60.200 – Revocation or Modification of Permits, may initiate revocation or modification of the subject conditional use permit and schedule a hearing before the Planning Commission and/or City Council for consideration of revocation and/or modification. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division Code Enforcement Division 24. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division - 12 - PC2021-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. 25. The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division 26. The business premises shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner, which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division ATTACHMENT 2 -Page 1- JUSTIFICATION FOR PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING SERVICES DIVISION Revised 4/2008 The State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) is charged with the responsibility under state statute to review and issue licenses for the sale and/or manufacture of alcoholic beverages. State law provides that ABC shall deny an application for a license if the issuance of that license would either create a law enforcement problem, or result in or add to an undue concentration of licenses, unless a determination is made that public convenience or necessity would be served by the issuance of that license. The City has been designated to make determinations of public convenience or necessity for all applications except for non-retail, hotel, motel, restaurant, and manufacturing establishments if the proposed license is located in an area of high crime or overconcentration of licenses. Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) is a discretionary action decided by the Planning Commission or City Council only after reviewing the location, need, and surrounding land uses. It is the responsibility of the applicant to justify the Public Convenience or Necessity for alcohol sales. The City Council has established procedures for the determination of Public Convenience or Necessity and has delegated the responsibility for making such determinations to the Anaheim Planning Commission. In order to assist the Planning Commission in its deliberations as to whether the public convenience or necessity would be served by permitting an additional alcohol establishment within an area containing an over concentration of licenses and/or high crime rate, please provide a letter of justification to answer the following questions. 1.What is the primary purpose of your business? Is the sale of alcohol an essential part of the primary purpose of the business? The primary purpose of my business is to sell a variety of products to shoppers who are on the go and are wanting to make quick purchases. As my business is a convenience store, I sell a range of everyday items that includes snack foods, bottled beverages, over-the-counter drugs, and toiletries to my neighboring community. In being able to sell these essentials and other such items, I believe that the sale of alcohol is an essential part of the primary purpose of convenience stores as alcohol is a product that people are often looking to make quick shopping trips for. 2.Are there similar businesses or a concentration of alcohol outlets in the immediate area that already provide alcohol service? If so, how would the public convenience or necessity be served by permitting an additional license within the census tract? There is one other business that is able to sell alcohol in the immediate area. That business is not easily reachable to my customers who are looking to go out and purchase alcohol on foot however. They often illegally and unsafely cross a nearby street and intersection, which often has heavy traffic, in order to reach that store. As it is a long and dangerous walk for them, the additional permission of a ATTACHMENT 3 CITY OF ANAHEIM JUSTIFICATION FOR A VARIANCE OR CODE WAIVER Page 2 of 3 liquor license to my store would convenience the public by providing them with a closer location to purchase alcohol that is more easily and safely reachable by foot. My customers would no longer have to endanger their lives by having to take a long dangerous walk in order to make a quick purchase of alcohol. 3. Is there a residential neighborhood or school adjacent to the property for which you are requesting a public convenience or necessity determination? If so, please explain how permitting an additional license would not disproportionately impact an adjacent residential neighborhood or school. There is a residential neighborhood further back behind my business property. The permission of an additional license would not disproportionately impact that neighborhood because they would simply be purchasing their alcohol from a store that is nearer to them rather than from the aforementioned business that is further away. And going to safe neighborhood lifes to crossing the street illegally or way 400- 600 ft to nearest liquor store 4. What percentage of your business do you anticipate will be alcohol sales? Given that alcohol is one of the three most sold items sold at convenience stores alongside lottery tickets and tobacco products according to many sources, I anticipate that at least 50% of my business would become alcohol sales. As I often have existing customers request for my store to sell alcohol and new customers ask if my store sells it, I fully anticipate that a large percentage of my business would go to alcohol sales based on the demand for it that I have seen. In addition, alcohol sales had recently surged amid all the events surrounding the Coronavirus according to news reports, so I have further reason to believe that alcohol would sell highly. 5. Does your business cater to a specific need or specialty which is not currently available in the area? My business does offer other services that are not widely available in the immediate area. Besides being a convenience store, my business also provides DMV registration services as well as other legal services to the local community. As such, it serves as a one-stop shop for quick purchases and other services that convenience the community. 6. Are you proposing any specific operational measures to eliminate or limit any potential negative consequences from the sale of alcoholic beverages? My store will employ a number of operational measures in order to limit the potential negative consequences from selling alcoholic beverages. Some of the measures that will be put in place include rules prohibiting drinking on the business premises, prohibiting having open containers on the property, and prohibiting loitering on the property. In addition, my store will limit the hours that CITY OF ANAHEIM JUSTIFICATION FOR A VARIANCE OR CODE WAIVER Page 3 of 3 alcohol would be available for purchase to avoid problems associated with late night purchases of alcohol. I would limit the purchase of alcohol to be between the hours of 10am-11pm on Sundays through Thursdays and between the hours of 10am-12am on Fridays and Saturdays. 7. What type of license are you requesting from ABC? Is it an existing license? Where is the license being purchased from? I am requesting a new liquor license for the sale of liquor for consumption off the premises. p ATTACHMENT 4 (TITLE 24, PART 6) ENERGY 2019 T-24 ENERGY STANDARDS 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC) 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC) 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC) APPLICABLE BUILDINGS STANDARDS BUILDING 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC) PLUMBING MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL 2019 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE (CRC)RESIDENTIAL 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (CFC)FIRE 2019 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE(E) BUILDING 2019 CALIFORNIA REFERENCE STANDARD CODEREFERENCE REMOVE INTERIOR PARTITION WALL SCOPE OF WORK NSIDEWALK123.00' P.L.174.00' P.L. #2664 174.00' P.L.123.00' P.L.#2666 PATH OF #2662 #2660 TRAVEL1 9 3 2 5 7 6 4 10 11 8 9'-0"47'-6"27'-0"16'-9"31'-9"7'-0"30'-0"30'-0"24'-0"56'-0" 1 3 2 5 4A6 A6A6A61 2 A6 SIDEWALK81'-0" 55'-9" 37'-3"8'-0"20'-0" 33'-0"21'-0"21'-0"81'-0"51'-9"73'-0"8'-0"37'-3"12'-0"PATH OF TRAVELSTINTON ST.LINCOLN AVE.LOCATION:1 SHEET JOB DRAWIN SHEETOF SCALE DATEVazquez DesignsDRAFTING & BLUE PRINTSE-MAIL:designsv@yahoo.comFAX. (562) 928 - 1863TEL. (562) 928 - 9175EXCEPT BY WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITHTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONSTHE VAZQUEZ DESIGNS.ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHTOF THE VAZQUEZ DESIGNS AND SHALLNOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK BUILDING DESIGN & CONSULTINGENERGY CALCULATIONS8050 E.FLORENCE AVE.SUITE 34 NDOWNEY, CA 90240BYREVISIONS 2664 / 2666 W. LINCOLN AVE. "A"ANAHEIM, CA. 90706(714) 743-0825 SITE PLAN SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" SLAYTON, LEILA LOUISE TR 0.5 ACRES APN:126-031-14 PROPERTY SIZE: SITE OWNERSHIP: RESIDENTIAL - LOW MEDIUM (R-LM) GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-G)ZONING: GENERAL PLAN: NONE RETAIL USEEXISTING LAND USE: REDEVELOPMENT AREA: SLAYTON DECEDENT TR PROPERTY INFO 12. 4'-0"SIDE WALK SIDE WALK 4'-0" MOCCUPANCY III-ATYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ZERO CURB LINEBUILDING SPRINKLED NO ONE STORY BUILDING (E) TRUNCATED DOMES SHEET INDEX #1 SITE PLAN & PROPERTY INFO. #2 FLOOR PLAN PATH OF TRAVEL DOES NOT EXEED 5% IN SLOPE OR 2% IN CROSS SLOPE 207 1 3 5 4 2 6 A6A6A620'0''6' HIGH GATE IRON FENCE 6' HIGH IRON FENCE 8 9 10 10'0''8'6''18'0''(TYP)33'0'' 4'-0" BACK UP BETWEEN # 2664 & 2666 COMBINE RETAIL SPACES # 2664 & 2666 INTO #2664 PROJECTAMERIGO(E) APPROVED ADA PARKING AND SIGNAGE9'0''9'0''ADA LANDING AREA NO PARKING ALL EGRESS HARDWARE SHALL BE SINGLE ACTION, NO KNOLEDGE HARDWARESTOREFRONTSTOREFRONT SEE PAGE 3 FOR DETAILS AND SIGNAGE TOW AWAY SIGN LOCATION SEE PAGER #3 FOR THRESHOLD DETAIL Existing Convenience Store LOCATION:2 SHEET JOB DRAWIN SHEETOF SCALE DATEVazquez DesignsDRAFTING & BLUE PRINTSE-MAIL:designsv@yahoo.comFAX. (562) 928 - 1863TEL. (562) 928 - 9175EXCEPT BY WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITHTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONSTHE VAZQUEZ DESIGNS.ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHTOF THE VAZQUEZ DESIGNS AND SHALLNOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK BUILDING DESIGN & CONSULTINGENERGY CALCULATIONS8050 E.FLORENCE AVE.SUITE 34 NDOWNEY, CA 90240BYREVISIONS 2664 / 2666 W. LINCOLN AVE. "A"ANAHEIM, CA. 90706EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING WALLS EXISTING WALLS NEW WALLS (E) WALL LEGEND:(714) 743-0825STORE FRONTCOLUMN (E) COLUMN (E)1'-6"1'-9"1'-9"3'-0"1'-9"3'-9"3'-6"3'-9"6'-6"3'-4"24'-5"3'-0"0'-11"15'-6"14'-6" ELECTRICAL PANELS (E)2666 A2666 BEXISTING(N) RESTROOM (E) ADA STORE FRONT0'-11"3'-0"13'-1"36'-3" 4'-3"4'-3"5'-0"16'-6"37'-3" (E) FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0"3'-0"2'-0"GFI FL Ø5'-0 "8'-0"1'-6" 6'-9" 1 TYPE DOOR SCHEDULE No. 1 DIMENSION DESCRIPTION 2 3'-0"X6'-8"COREHOLLOW 8'-0" 3'-0" COLUMN (E) SCOPE OF WORK: REMOVE INTERIOR PARTITION WALL AMERIGOPROJECT(E) APPROVED ADA ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM 60'' MIN 1'-6" Ø5'-0 " FL 60'' MINGFI 1 7'-6"4'-4"4'-4"2'-10"2- COOLERS SHELFS 6'-0"SHELFSDISPLAY COUNTERS CASHIER6'-0"DESK4'-0"6'-0"COUNTER15'-0"16'-0"SHELFS6'-0"DEEPFREEZERATMCOOLERCOOLERDEEPFREEZERATMSTORAGESHELFSSHELFSCOOLERCOOLER5'-0"4'-0"SHELFS2'-0"4'-0" 4'-0"8'-0"4'-0" 4'-0"Storage of alcoholic beveragesDisplay of beer and other malt beveragesDisplay of spirits behind counter Subject Propoerty NEW CORRESPONDENCE NEW CORRESPONDENCE 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: NOVEMBER 8, 2021 SUBJECT: SANTA ANA RIVER REORGANIZATION (DEV2021-00203) LOCATION: The subject properties are located within City of Orange along the Santa Ana River from approximately 1,000 feet south of Katella Avenue to 1,000 feet south of Orangewood Avenue, east of the Anaheim/Orange city boundaries to the top of the western levee of the Santa Ana River. APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: City of Anaheim. REQUEST: This is a City-initiated General Plan Amendment and Zoning Reclassification to facilitate the realignment of a portion of the municipal boundary between the cities of Anaheim and Orange, along the Santa Ana River, north and south of Orangewood Avenue (Proposed Project). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1) By resolution (Attachment 1), recommend that the City Council approve a General Plan Amendment to amend the Land Use Element for the Proposed Project; 2) By motion, recommend that the City Council approve an ordinance (Attachment 2) to reclassify the subject properties for the Proposed Project; and, 3) By motion, recommend that the City Council determine that an addendum (Attachment 3) to the previously certified Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, and its subsequent addenda, is the appropriate environmental documentation for the above actions under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). BACKGROUND: The City of Anaheim is proposing a city boundary reorganization with the City Orange, as shown on the map on the following page, to facilitate the following activities: SANTA ANA RIVER REORGANIZATION DEV2021-00203 November 8, 2021 Page 2 of 8 • Areas 1 and 1A: The North Net Training Authority, of which the cities of Anaheim and Orange are members through a cooperative agreement, plans to expand its North Net Training Center, located in Anaheim, onto properties, located in the City of Orange. • Area 2: The City plans to purchase property, which is currently located in the City of Orange, from the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) for park purposes. • Area 3: The City plans to widen and improve Orangewood Avenue, including portions of the street that are located in the City of Orange. Subject Properties The City has separately processed a city boundary reorganization for Area 2A, which the Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) approved on October 13, 2021. SANTA ANA RIVER REORGANIZATION DEV2021-00203 November 8, 2021 Page 3 of 8 The following flow chart shows the multiple steps required to process a city boundary reorganization. Prior to the review and approval of a reorganization by the LAFCO, the City is required to amend its General Plan to reflect the intended use of the subject properties. LAFCO also requires the City to “pre-zone” the territory that is to be annexed. The City completes this pre- zone requirement through the Planning Commission’s recommendation of the draft zoning reclassification ordinance to the City Council. Subsequent to LAFCO’s approval of the boundary reorganization, the City Council will consider the introduction and adoption of the ordinance. City Boundary Reorganization Process The following is a more detailed description of each of the areas and their intended use: Area 1 - OCFCD Excess South of Orangewood Avenue: This property is south of Orangewood Avenue and bound by North Net Training Center (2400 E. Orangewood Ave., Anaheim, CA 92806) and the Santa Ana River Trail. North Net is in the process of acquiring property from OCFCD for continued operational use for the North Net Training Center. Area 1A - North Net Sliver: The proposed reorganization would realign a sliver of the North Net Training Center property to allow the entire parcel to be located within the Anaheim city limits. This sliver would continue to provide operational use for North Net and incorporated with the proposed acquisition. Area 2 - OCFCD Excess North of Orangewood Avenue: This property is located between Orangewood Avenue and approximately 100 feet south of the State Route 57 freeway. Area 2 consists of a regional bike trail and landscaping. The City is currently studying the potential to purchase Area 2 from the OCFCD for the development of a park as part of a future, separate and independent project. City Approves General Plan Land Use Designation and Pre-Zoning CEQA Compliance Application to LAFCO Property Tax Exchange LAFCO Application LAFCO Staff Review LAFCO Public Hearing Recordation of Certificate of Completion City Finalizes Zoning SANTA ANA RIVER REORGANIZATION DEV2021-00203 November 8, 2021 Page 4 of 8 Area 3 – Orangewood Avenue: Orangewood Avenue is currently a five-lane existing roadway and designated by the City’s General Plan as a Primary Arterial. The City is currently working on the Orangewood Avenue Improvements Project to expand the roadway to a six-lane divided facility to provide expanded bicycle and pedestrian access from the Santa Ana River. This will require widening the bridge structure over the Santa Ana River. Remaining Area: The remaining area includes land between the existing City boundary and proposed City boundary, which is generally the top of the western levee of the Santa Ana River, excluding Areas 1, 1A, 2, and 3. The remaining area located north of Orangewood Avenue consists of a regional bike trail and landscaping. The remaining area located south of Orangewood Avenue includes a continuation of the regional bike trail, landscaping, and a small area with play equipment, benches, and a shade structure. LAFCO requested inclusion of this area to create a more uniform boundary than what would occur using the above areas as the city boundary. PROPOSAL: The following table shows the existing and proposed General Plan land use designations and zoning for the subject properties. Area Subject to Reorganization Existing General Plan Designation Existing Zoning Proposed General Plan Designation Proposed Zoning Area 1 OCFCD Excess (south of Orangewood Avenue) Area 1A North Net Sliver Open Space None Mixed-Use Urban Core Public Recreational (PR) Zone Platinum Triangle Mixed- Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone Orangewood District Sub Area B Area 2 OCFCD Excess (north of Orangewood Avenue) Open Space None Park Public Recreational (PR) Zone Area 3 Orangewood Avenue Primary Arterial Not Applicable Primary Arterial (No Change) Not Applicable Remaining Area Open Space None Open Space (No Change) Open Space (OS) Zone Government Code Section 65300 requires each county and city to adopt a comprehensive, long- term general plan for the physical development of the county or city, and certain land outside its boundaries, referred to as its “sphere of influence.” The subject properties have existing General Plan land use designations because they are within Anaheim’s “sphere of influence.” The subject properties do not have zoning because they are not within the City of Anaheim; and therefore, are not subject to Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: The General Plan is the guide for the City’s future development. It designates the distribution and location of specific land uses and establishes the permitted densities for each land use designation. Government Code Section 65860 requires a county or city’s zoning to be consistent with the General Plan. SANTA ANA RIVER REORGANIZATION DEV2021-00203 November 8, 2021 Page 5 of 8 Before the Planning Commission can recommend approval of a General Plan Amendment to the City Council, it must make the following findings: a) The proposed amendment maintains the internal consistency of the General Plan; b) The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; c) The proposed amendment would maintain the balance of land uses within the City; and d) If the amendment is to the General Plan Land Use Map, the subject property is physically suitable to accommodate the proposed modification, including but not limited to, access, physical constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility with surrounding land uses. As further described below, the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Land Use Element which include: • Planning for and accommodating projected growth to enhance the quality of life for residents, • Clarifying land use designations to provide the public with a reliable estimate of the type and intensity of future development, and • Ensuring compatibility between adjacent land uses by allowing the City to apply zoning policies and study potential uses to reduce the potential for land use conflicts within the project area. In addition, the following analysis also describes the consistency between the proposed zoning and the General Plan. Areas 1 (OCFCD Excess South of Orangewood Avenue) and 1A (North Net Sliver): Staff proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation for Areas 1 and 1A from Open Space to Mixed-Use Urban Core. In addition, staff recommends placing Areas 1 and 1A in the “PR” Public Recreational Zone and the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone, which implements the Mixed-Use Urban Core land use designation. The proposed land use designation and zoning are the same as that of the adjacent North Net Training Center. • The Mixed-Use Urban Core land use designation allows a mix of uses including residential, commercial, services, hotel, and professional office uses in a high-quality environment. The focus of this designation is on creating a pedestrian-friendly environment, including increased connectivity and community gathering spaces. Uses and activities are in an integrated fashion to create a dynamic urban environment. Continuous commercial street frontage on the first and, perhaps, second floors, supported by residential and/or office uses above, is the typical pattern of vertically mixed land use. Uses may also mix in a horizontal or multi-use pattern. Stand-alone uses within a multi-use project need to integrate into an SANTA ANA RIVER REORGANIZATION DEV2021-00203 November 8, 2021 Page 6 of 8 overall project design and connected to other adjoining uses by plazas, promenades, and landscaped corridors; and, should include common architectural themes and signage. Typical residential uses could include stacked flats, live-work units, and artist-style lofts. Residential development in these areas emphasizes quality and offers a variety of amenities. The maximum density for the residential component of mixed-use development is up to 100 dwelling units per acre. The maximum floor area ratio for the non-residential component of mixed-use development is 3.00. The implementing zones are The Downtown Mixed-Use Overlay; The Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use Overlay; and, for areas outside of The Platinum Triangle or Downtown areas, the Mixed Use Overlay Zone. • The intent of the PR Zone is to establish for the benefit of the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of Anaheim and its visitors, a zone to preserve, regulate and control the orderly use and enjoyment of City-owned properties and facilities and adjacent private property. Property within the purview of the PR Zone includes City-owned property, whether the City occupies the property or the City allows others to use the property on the basis of some agreement with or concession by the City. • The intent of the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone is to provide opportunities for well-designed development projects that combine residential with non- residential uses. The non-residential uses include office, retail, business services, personal services, public spaces and uses, and other community amenities within the portions of the Platinum Triangle designated with the Mixed-Use, Office High and Office Low land use designations in the City of Anaheim General Plan, and consistent with the policy direction in the General Plan. The anticipated expansion and continued use of the North Net Training Center is consistent with the intent of the PR Zone. The City’s long-term plan for the site is consistent with the intent of the Mixed-Use Urban Core land use designation and the PTMU Overlay Zone, which implements this General Plan designation. The existing North Net Training Center is within Sub-Area B of the Orangewood District of the PTMU Overlay Zone. The proposed reclassification of Areas 1 and 1a into the PTMU Overlay Zone would also place these areas within Sub-Area B of the Orangewood District of the PTMU Overlay Zone. The PTMU Overlay Zone allows the development of up to 321 dwelling units within this sub-area. With the proposed reclassification, the maximum development intensity of 321 dwelling units would continue to apply to all of Sub-Area B, including the existing North Net Training Center and Areas 1 and 1A. Area 2 (OCFCD Excess North of Orangewood Avenue): Staff proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation for Area 2 from Open Space to Parks. In addition, staff recommends placing Area 2 in the “PR” Public Recreational Zone, which implements the Parks land use designation. This recommendation meets the required findings for General Plan Amendments by promoting the expansion of accessible public parks, open space amenities, and recreational opportunities along the Santa Ana River, while allowing for the potential improvement of the City’s trail and bicycle network for local and regional connections. SANTA ANA RIVER REORGANIZATION DEV2021-00203 November 8, 2021 Page 7 of 8 • The Parks land use designation allows for active and passive recreational uses such as parks, trails, athletic fields, interpretive centers, and golf courses. The Parks land use designation permits a maximum floor area ratio of 0.10. • As described above, the intent of the PR zone is to establish for the benefit of the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Anaheim and its visitors, a zone to preserve, regulate, and control the orderly use and enjoyment of City-owned properties and facilities and adjacent private property. The proposed land use designation for this area promotes the General Plan Green Element Goal 18.1 to provide for sufficient parks and recreation opportunities for existing and future residents and employees. To support the implementation of Goal 18.1, the proposed land use changes and anticipated boundary adjustment follow the associated policies which encourages development of park facilities in areas of high employment concentrations and where opportunities for land acquisition exist. Area 3 Orangewood Avenue: Staff is not proposing any change to the street’s existing designation as a primary arterial; or, adding zoning because zoning would not be applicable to this area. Remaining Area: The General Plan designates the remaining area that is the subject of the city boundary reorganization for Open Space land use. Staff proposes to reclassify this area to the “OS” Open Space Zone, which implements the Open Space General Plan land use designation. • The Open Space land use designation applies to properties intended to remain in natural open space; utility easements that will provide recreational and trail access to Anaheim’s residents; heavily landscaped freeway remnant parcels, and land areas surrounding major water features. This designation permits a maximum floor area ratio of 0.10. • The intent of the OS Zone is to protect and preserve open space for the preservation of natural resources, for the conservation and managed production of other resources, for outdoor recreation and education, and for public health and safety. This zone often applies to permanent easements, public and semi-public land and agricultural land. Pursuant to the above analysis, staff recommends the General Plan land use designations and zoning shown in the table on page four and identified in the attached draft resolution and ordinance. Environmental Impact Analysis: Addendum No. 9 to the previously-certified Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project and its subsequent addendum (collectively referred to as “SEIR No. 339”) has been prepared to include an analysis of the implementation of the proposed General Plan land use designations and zoning. The addendum analyzed the proposed changes and determined that the proposed project would not result in any substantial increase or any new significant impacts than those that SEIR No. 339 has previously analyzed. This project’s potential impacts would be the same or less than those previously described by these documents, and thus does not require the preparation of a subsequent SANTA ANA RIVER REORGANIZATION DEV2021-00203 November 8, 2021 Page 8 of 8 or supplemental EIR. Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council determine the addendum is the appropriate environmental documentation for the above actions under CEQA. CONCLUSION: Staff believes that the proposed General Plan Amendment and zoning will facilitate a future City boundary adjustment that will allow for future development of the subject properties consistent with the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code and the anticipated future use of these sites. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the proposed project. Prepared by, Submitted by, Charles Guiam Niki Wetzel, AICP Planner Deputy Planning and Building Director Attachments: 1. Draft Planning Commission General Plan Amendment Resolution 2. Draft City Council Reclassification Ordinance 3. Addendum No. 9 !!!!!!$$!!!!!!$$DOUGLASSRDORANGEWOOD AVE KATELLA AVE City of Anaheim City of Orange North Net Angel Stadium 01,000500 Feet¯ City of Anaheim GIS Central 10/19/2021 6338 57 DEV2021-00203 Santa Ana River Reorganization Key to Features Project Site City Boundary Proposed City Boundary Parcel Boundary ~ 1000 ft ~ 1000 ft DOUGLASSRDORANGEW OOD AVE KATELLA AVE City of Anaheim City of Orange North Net Angel Stadium 0 1,000500 Feet¯ City of Anaheim GIS Central 11/4/2021 6338 57 DEV2021-00203 Santa Ana River Reorganization Key to Features Project Site City Boundary Parcel Boundary Aerial: May 2021 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2021-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2021-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVE AND ADOPT PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (DEV2021-00203) (SANTA ANA REORGANIZATION PROJECT) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim (the "City Council") intends to re-designate that certain real property located within City of Orange along the Santa Ana River from approximately 1,000 feet south of Katella Avenue to 1,000 feet south of Orangewood Avenue, east of the Anaheim/Orange city boundary to the top of the western levee of the Santa Ana River, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A1 and Exhibit A2 and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property") to facilitate the realignment of said Property; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 8.34 acres in size and the majority of the Property is not designated within the Zoning Map of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed General Plan Amendment proposes to amend "Figure LU-4: Land Use Plan” of the Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan to re-designate Area 1 and 1A from Open Space to Mixed-Used Urban Core General Plan Land use and Area 2 from Open Space to Parks General Plan land use, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit B1 and Exhibit B2; and WHEREAS, the proposed General Plan Amendment is proposed in conjunction with a zoning reclassification of Area 1, Area 1A, and Area 2 to the “PR” Public Recreational Zone and remaining portions of the subject properties encompassed within the Property to the “OS” Open Space zone, as generally depicted on the maps attached hereto as Exhibit C1 and Exhibit C2 and shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15367, the City has discretionary authority over the Proposed Project and is the Lead Agency in the preparation of Addendum No. 9 (“Addendum”) to the previously-certified Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project (“SEIR No. 339”), and its subsequent addenda, and any additional environmental documentation required for the Proposed Project. The Addendum utilizes analysis from the previously-certified SEIR No. 339, which was certified by the Anaheim City Council on October 26, 2010. In addition, - 2 - PC2021-*** since approval of SEIR No. 339, eight addenda to SEIR No. 339 have been prepared related to various projects developed since adoption of FSEIR No. 339. The Addendum collectively refers to the previously-certified Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, and its subsequent addenda as the “Certified EIR”. The Addendum compares the Proposed Project's effects with the analysis in the Certified EIR and assists the Lead Agency in the evaluation of potential environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. Mitigation measures from the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106C, referred to as “MMP No. 106C” or “Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339”, from the Certified EIR that are applicable to the Proposed Project are included in the Addendum; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that an addendum pursuant to Section 15164 (Addendum to an EIR or Negative Declaration) of the CEQA Guidelines is the appropriate environmental review for this request under CEQA; and, that the Proposed Project requires preparation of an Addendum to a previously-certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred; and WHEREAS, based upon the analysis included in the Addendum to the Certified EIR prepared in connection with the Proposed Project, the Planning Commission has concluded that the Proposed Project will not result in new significant impacts or substantial increases in the severity of previously identified significant impacts and no supplemental or subsequent environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 9 addresses the environmental effects associated only with the changes in environmental setting or circumstances since certification of SEIR No. 339, and its subsequent addenda, and the conclusions of the analysis in Addendum No. 9 are not substantially different from those made in SEIR No. 339, and its subsequent addenda, and the same unavoidable significant impacts identified in SEIR No. 339, and its subsequent addenda, remain and no new significant impacts will result and no substantial increase in severity of impacts will result from those previously identified in SEIR No. 339, and its subsequent addenda; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does hereby find: 1. That the proposed General Plan Amendment maintains the internal consistency of the General Plan, as the Proposed Project is consistent with the objectives of the Land Use Element which include planning for and accommodating projected growth to enhance the quality of life for residents; and 2. That the proposed General Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City in that the proposed amendment to the Anaheim General Plan would clarify land use designations to provide the public with a reliable estimate of the type and intensity of future development; and - 3 - PC2021-*** 3. That the proposed General Plan Amendment would maintain the balance of land uses within the City because the proposed amendment would ensure compatibility between adjacent land uses by allowing the City to apply Zoning policies and study potential uses to reduce the potential for land use conflicts within the project area; and 4. That the Property is physically suitable to accommodate the proposed modification, including but not limited to, access, physical constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility with surrounding land uses because the Property is anticipated to be served by the City of Anaheim upon annexation and reclassification of the Property and future development proposals will be required to comply with development standards required by the General Plan and implementing Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, the Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of Anaheim approve and adopt the proposed General Plan Amendment. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of November 8, 2021. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. - 4 - PC2021-*** CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Laverne Ortiz, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on November 8, 2021, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of November, 2021. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 5 - Exhibt A1 - 6 - Exhibt A2 - 7 - - 8 - Exhibt B1 - 9 - Exhibt B2 - 10 - Exhibt C1 - 11 - Exhibt C2 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (DEV2019-00013) SANTA ANA RIVER REORGANIZATION WHEREAS, State law permits a city to pre-zone property adjoining the city for the purpose of determining zoning that will apply to such property in the event of subsequent annexation to the city. Pre-zoning becomes effective at the same time that the annexation becomes effective; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim (the "City Council") intends to pre- zone that certain real property located within City of Orange along the Santa Ana River from approximately 1,000 feet south of Katella Avenue to 1,000 feet south of Orangewood Avenue, east of the Anaheim/Orange city boundary to the top of the western levee of the Santa Ana River, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A1 and Exhibit A2 and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property") to facilitate the realignment of said Property; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 8.34 acres in size and the majority of the Property is not designated within the Zoning Map of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed reclassification proposes to pre-zone Area 1, Area 1A, and Area 2 to the “PR” Public Recreational Zone and remaining portions of the subject properties encompassed within the Property to the “OS” Open Space zone, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit B1 and Exhibit B2; and WHEREAS, the proposed reclassification is proposed in conjunction with a General Plan Amendment to redesignate Area 1 and 1A from Open Space to Mixed-Used Urban Core General Plan Land use and Area 2 from Open Space to Parks General Plan land use, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit C1 and Exhibit C2 and shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15367, the City has discretionary authority over the Proposed Project and is the Lead Agency in the preparation of Addendum No. 9 (“Addendum”) to the previously-certified Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project (“SEIR No. 339”), and its subsequent addenda, and any additional environmental documentation required for the Proposed Project. The Addendum utilizes analysis from the previously-certified SEIR No. 339, which was certified by the Anaheim City Council on October 26, 2010. In addition, - 2 - since approval of SEIR No. 339, eight addenda to SEIR No. 339 have been prepared related to various projects developed since adoption of FSEIR No. 339. The Addendum collectively refers to the previously-certified Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, and its subsequent addenda as the “Certified EIR”. The Addendum compares the Proposed Project's effects with the analysis in the Certified EIR and assists the Lead Agency in the evaluation of potential environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. Mitigation measures from the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106C, referred to as “MMP No. 106C” or “Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339”, from the Certified EIR that are applicable to the proposed project are included in the Addendum; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that an addendum pursuant to Section 15164 (Addendum to an EIR or Negative Declaration) of the CEQA Guidelines is the appropriate environmental review for this request under CEQA; and, that the Proposed Project requires preparation of an Addendum to a previously-certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred; and WHEREAS, based upon the analysis included in the Addendum to the Certified EIR prepared in connection with the Proposed Project, the Planning Commission has concluded that the Project will not result in new significant impacts or substantial increases in the severity of previously identified significant impacts and no supplemental or subsequent environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 9 addresses the environmental effects associated only with the changes in environmental setting or circumstances since certification of SEIR No. 339, and its subsequent addenda, and the conclusions of the analysis in Addendum No. 9 are not substantially different from those made in SEIR No. 339, and its subsequent addenda, and the same unavoidable significant impacts identified in SEIR No. 339, and its subsequent addenda, remain and no new significant impacts will result and no substantial increase in severity of impacts will result from those previously identified in SEIR No. 339, and its subsequent addenda; and WHEREAS, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and in its behalf, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports offered at said hearing relating to Proposed Project, the Planning Commission, by motion, recommended that the City Council approve and adopt the proposed Reclassification, in the form presented at the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Planning Commission recommendation, made by motion, the City Council did fix the ___ day of _____, 2021, as the time, and the City Council Chamber in the Civic Center, as the place, for a public hearing on the Proposed Project, and did give notice thereof in the manner and as provided by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does hereby find and determine as follows: 1. The proposed pre-zone of the Property by reclassifying Area 1, Area 1A, and Area 2 to the “PR” Public Recreational Zone and remaining portions of the subject properties encompassed within the Property to the “OS” Open Space zone, - 3 - is necessary in that City records indicate that the property is not designated within the Zoning Map of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 2. The proposed pre-zone of the Property by designating Area 1, Area 1A, and Area 2 to the “PR” Public Recreational Zone and remaining portions of the subject properties encompassed within the Property to the “OS” Open Space zone, would be consistent with the Property’s existing and proposed land use designations in the General Plan. 3. The proposed pre-zone of the Property is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the Proposed Project and is compatible with the surrounding properties; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Ordinance, that the facts stated in this Ordinance are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Ordinance. The City Council expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Map referred to in Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code be, and the same is hereby, amended by reclassifying the Area 1, Area 1A, and Area 2 to the “PR” Public Recreational Zone and remaining portions of the subject properties encompassed within the subject Property to the “OS” Open Space zone as described above effective upon annexation of the Property. SECTION 2. Effective upon annexation of the Property, The City Zoning Map shall be, and the same is hereby, amended and the above-described Property shall be excluded from the zone in which it is now situated and incorporated in and made a part of the zone or zones as above set forth, and said City Zoning Map, as amended, is hereby adopted and the Planning Department is hereby directed to prepare a sectional zoning map to be added to the City Zoning Map showing the changes hereby approved and adopted. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be printed once within fifteen (15) days after its adoption in the Anaheim Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Anaheim, and thirty (30) days from and after its final passage, it shall take effect and be in full force. - 4 - THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the ____ day of ______________, 2021, and thereafter passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the ____ day of ______________, 2021, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN CITY OF ANAHEIM _________________________________ MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: _____________________________________ CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 5 - Exhibt A1 - 6 - Exhibt A2 - 7 - - 8 - Exhibt B1 - 9 - Exhibt B2 - 10 - Exhibt C1 - 11 - Exhibt C2 FINAL  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM  Orangewood Avenue Improvements From the Santa Ana River to the East of SR-57 and Reorganization of Jurisdictional Boundaries Lead Agency:  CITY OF ANAHEIM 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162  Anaheim, California 92805  Contact:  Andy Uk  714.765.5238  auk@anaheim.net  Prepared by:  MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500  Santa Ana, California 92707  Contact:  Mr. Alan Ashimine  949.472.3505  November 2021  JN 159416 ATTACHMENT 3     The format of this document is for double‐sided printing to conserve natural resources.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 iii Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1‐1  1.1 California Environmental Quality Act .................................................................................. 1‐2  1.1.1 CEQA Requirements For Preparation Of An Addendum ........................................ 1‐2  1.1.2 Type of CEQA Compliance Document and Level of Analysis ................................. 1‐3  1.2 Project Summary ................................................................................................................. 1‐5  1.3 Project Background ............................................................................................................. 1‐6  1.4 Format and Content of this Addendum ............................................................................ 1‐10  1.5 Environmental Checklist.................................................................................................... 1‐10  1.6 Documents Incorporated by Reference .......................................................................... 1‐111  2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 2‐1  2.1 Project Location .................................................................................................................. 2‐1  2.2 Environmental Setting ......................................................................................................... 2‐1  2.3 Proposed Project ................................................................................................................. 2‐4  2.3.1 Orangewood Avenue Right‐of‐Way Acquisition .................................................... 2‐8  2.3.2 Bridge Structure Improvements ............................................................................ 2‐8  2.3.3 Trail and Stormwater Facility Improvements ........................................................ 2‐8  2.3.4 Pipe Line Connection ............................................................................................. 2‐9  2.3.5 Construction and Phasing ...................................................................................... 2‐9  2.3.6 Santa Ana River Reorganization ............................................................................. 2‐9  2.3.7 Project Approvals ................................................................................................. 2‐17  3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ................................................................................................. 3‐1  3.1 Aesthetics ............................................................................................................................ 3‐3  3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources .................................................................................... 3‐7  3.3 Air Quality ......................................................................................................................... 3‐11  3.4 Biological Resources .......................................................................................................... 3‐21  3.5 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................ 3‐27  3.6 Energy................................................................................................................................ 3‐31  3.7 Geology and Soils .............................................................................................................. 3‐35  3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................................................... 3‐43  3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials .................................................................................... 3‐49  3.10 Hydrology and Water Quality ........................................................................................... 3‐57  3.11 Land Use and Planning ...................................................................................................... 3‐67  3.12 Mineral Resources ............................................................................................................. 3‐71  3.13 Noise ................................................................................................................................. 3‐73  3.14 Population and Housing .................................................................................................... 3‐79  3.15 Public Services ................................................................................................................... 3‐81  3.16 Recreation ......................................................................................................................... 3‐85  3.17 Transportation .................................................................................................................. 3‐87  3.18 Tribal Cultural Resources .................................................................................................. 3‐93  3.19 Utilities And Service Systems ............................................................................................ 3‐97  3.20 Wildfire ............................................................................................................................ 3‐105  3.21 Mandatory Findings Of Significance ............................................................................... 3‐109  4.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 4‐1  5.0 PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORS ......................................................................................... 5‐1  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 iv Table of Contents 6.0 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................ 6‐1  LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 2‐1 Regional Vicinity .................................................................................................................. 2‐2  Exhibit 2‐2 Site Vicinity .......................................................................................................................... 2‐3  Exhibit 2‐3 Site Plan ............................................................................................................................... 2‐5  Exhibit 2‐4 Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan – Orangewood Avenue Improvements ............... 2‐6  Exhibit 2‐5 Santa Ana River Reorganization Area ............................................................................... 2‐10  Exhibit 2‐6 Existing General Plan Land Use Map ................................................................................. 2‐11  Exhibit 2‐7 Proposed General Plan Land Use Map .............................................................................. 2‐12  Exhibit 2‐8 Existing Zoning Map .......................................................................................................... 2‐13  Exhibit 2‐9 Proposed Zoning Map ....................................................................................................... 2‐14  Exhibit 2‐10 Proposed Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan .......................................................... 2‐18         SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 v Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES Table  1‐1 SEIR No. 339 Addenda Summary Table  ............................................................................... 1‐7  Table 1‐2 SCEA Summary Table .......................................................................................................... 1‐9  Table 2‐1 Santa Ana River Reorganization ........................................................................................ 2‐15  Table 3.8‐1 Consistency with SCAG’s 2020‐2045 Regional Transportation Plan/  Sustainable Communities Strategy Goals ......................................................................... 3‐45  Table 3.13‐1 Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Construction Equipment ...................................... 3‐74  Table 3.19‐1 Landfills Summary ........................................................................................................... 3‐101               SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 vi Table of Contents   LIST OF APPENDICES  Appendix A Biological Resources Assessment  Appendix B Jurisdictional Delineation  Appendix C Phase I Environmental Site Assessment  Appendix D Basis of Design Report  Appendix E SB 18 Consultation Memorandum    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 1-1 Introduction 1.0 INTRODUCTION   The City of Anaheim (City) proposes to widen Orangewood Avenue from a five‐lane roadway to a six‐lane  divided facility to provide expanded bicycle and pedestrian access from the Santa Ana River to just east  of State Route 57 (SR‐57) at the SR‐57/Orangewood Avenue interchange. In general, the Orangewood  Avenue Improvements Project (“Proposed Project”) would incorporate an additional westbound  through lane through the Project Site boundaries.  The Proposed Project would also include a water pipe  line connection in Orangewood Avenue right‐of‐way, generally beginning at Rampart Street and ending  to the east at Eckhoff Street. In addition, the Proposed Project includes a change to the jurisdictional  boundaries between the City of Anaheim and the City of Orange, west of the western levee of the Santa  Ana River, north and south or Orangewood Avenue. This proposed reorganization includes amendments  to the General Plan, Zoning Map, the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP), and other  related documents to reflect the new City boundary and potential future use of the affected property.    The City, as the Lead Agency, has prepared Addendum No. 9 (Addendum) to the Final Subsequent  Environmental Impact Report No. 339 (State Clearinghouse No. 2004121045) and Addendum Nos. 1  through 8, and 10 (herein collectively referred to as SEIR No. 339).1  The Anaheim City Council certified  and approved SEIR No. 339 for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project in 2010.  This document  refers to Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including all subsequent amendments analyzed by  Addendum Nos. 1 through 8 and 10, as the “Approved Project.”  The City has prepared this Addendum in  accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public  Resources Code [PRC] Sections 21000 et seq.); the State CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, California Code of  Regulations [CCR] Sections 15000 et seq.); and the rules, regulations, and procedures for implementing  CEQA as set forth by the City of Anaheim. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15367, the City is  the lead agency with principal responsibility for considering the Proposed Project for approval.    This introduction discusses:    1. The requirements of CEQA;     2. The primary purpose of an addendum to a previously certified environmental impact report  (EIR);     3. The standards for adequacy of an addendum pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines;     4. SEIR No. 339;     5. The format and content of this Addendum;     6. The City’s processing requirements to consider the Proposed Project for approval;     7. An explanation of the Environmental Checklist provided in Section 3.0, Environmental Analysis;  and,    8. A summary of the documents that this addendum incorporates by reference and points of contact  for the Proposed Project.    1     One additional addendum and a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) were under  preparation at the time of the preparation of this Addendum; refer to Table 1‐1, SEIR No. 339 Addenda Summary Table.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 1-2 Introduction   1.1 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT   CEQA, a statewide environmental law contained in PRC Sections 21000–21177, applies to most public  agency decisions which carry out, authorize, or approve actions that have the potential to adversely  affect the environment.  The CEQA Guidelines allow for updating and using a previously certified EIR  for projects that have changed or are different from the previous project or conditions analyzed in the  certified EIR.  In cases where changes or additions occur with no new significant environmental impacts,  an addendum to a previously certified EIR may be prepared, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section  15164.  The City has prepared this Addendum in accordance with Section 21166 of CEQA and Sections  15162 and 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines.    1.1.1 CEQA REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATION OF AN ADDENDUM   Section 15164(a) of the CEQA Guidelines states that “the lead agency or a responsible agency shall  prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none  of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have  occurred.” Pursuant to Section 15162(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, a subsequent EIR or Negative  Declaration is only required when:    (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous  EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a  substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;    (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is  undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to  the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity  of previously identified significant effects; or    (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been  known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as  complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:    (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or  negative declaration;    (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in  the previous EIR;    (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be  feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but  the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or    (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed  in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the  environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or  alternative.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 1-3 Introduction The following describes the requirements of an addendum, as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15164:    a. The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if  some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162  calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.    b. An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical  changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling  for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred.    c. An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the  final EIR or adopted negative declaration.    d. The decision making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative  declaration prior to making a decision on the project.    e. A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162  should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency’s findings on the project, or  elsewhere in the record.  The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence.    If none of these circumstances is present, and only minor technical changes or additions are necessary to  update the previously certified EIR, an addendum may be prepared, consistent with CEQA Guidelines  Section 15164.  Based on the analysis and evaluation provided in this Addendum, no new significant  impacts would occur because of the Proposed Project nor any substantial increase in the severity of any  previously‐identified significant environmental impact.  In addition, no new information of substantial  importance shows that mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously found infeasible or that  are considerably different from those analyzed for SEIR No. 339 would substantially reduce one or more  significant effects on the environment.  Therefore, no conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA  Guidelines has occurred.  For this reason, an addendum is the appropriate document that will comply  with CEQA requirements for the Proposed Project.    1.1.2 TYPE OF CEQA COMPLIANCE DOCUMENT AND LEVEL OF ANALYSIS    The purpose of this Addendum is to analyze any potential differences between the impacts identified in  SEIR No. 339 for the Approved Project and those that would be associated with the Proposed Project.    Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City of Anaheim is the Lead Agency  charged with the responsibility of deciding whether to approve the Proposed Project.  As part of its  decision‐making process, the City is required to review and consider whether the Proposed Project would  create new significant impacts or significant impacts that would be substantially more severe than those  disclosed in SEIR No. 339.  The Proposed Project would only trigger additional CEQA review beyond this  Addendum if the Proposed Project creates new significant impacts or impacts that are more severe than  those disclosed in SEIR No. 339 for the Approved Project.  To use an addendum as the appropriate CEQA  document for the Proposed Project, the City must find that major revisions of the SEIR No. 339 are not  necessary and that none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the  preparation of additional CEQA documentation has occurred.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 1-4 Introduction CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(a) states that a Program EIR is appropriate for a series of actions,  characterized as one large project, and are related either:    1. Geographically;    2. A logical parts [sic] in the chain of contemplated actions;    3. In connection with issuance of rules, regulations, plans, or other general criteria to govern the  conduct of a continuing program; or    4. As individual activities carried out under the same authorizing statutory or regulatory authority  and having generally similar environmental effects which can be mitigated in similar ways.    As discussed in Section 2.0, the Proposed Project would allow for the widening and improvements to  a segment of Orangewood Avenue. In addition, the Proposed Project includes a change to the  jurisdictional boundaries between the City of Anaheim and the City of Orange. As detailed herein, the  Proposed Project would not result in any new significant impacts that were not analyzed in SEIR No. 339,  nor would the Project cause a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified  environmental impacts.  The potential impacts associated with this Proposed Project would either be  the same or less than those described in SEIR No. 339.  In addition, there are no substantial changes to  the circumstances, under which the City would undertake the Proposed Project that would result in  new or more severe environmental impacts than previously addressed in SEIR No. 339.  Furthermore,  this Addendum does not identify any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe  significant environmental impacts been identified.  Therefore, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines  Section 15164, this Addendum to the previously certified SEIR No. 339 is the appropriate  environmental documentation for the Proposed Project.  In acting on any of the approvals for the  Proposed Project, the decision‐making body must consider the whole of the data presented in the  SEIR No. 339 as augmented by this Addendum.  In addition, the decision making body must consider all  applicable mitigation from the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106C (also  referred to as “MMP No. 106C” and “Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339”) approved in conjunction  with SEIR No. 339.    If the City finds that, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no new effects could occur and no  new mitigation is required, the City can approve the activity as being within the scope of SEIR No. 339.   As such, SEIR No. 339 clearly anticipated environmental impacts associated with projects such as the  Proposed Project, and, thus, the SEIR was intended to serve as the Program EIR to be used in preparing  CEQA compliance documentation for future projects.    CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c) states that the decision making body must examine subsequent  activities undertaken pursuant to a Program EIR in light of the Program EIR to determine whether an  additional environmental document must be prepared.  Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section  15168(c)(4), “Where the subsequent activities involve site specific operations, the agency should use a  written checklist or similar device to document the evaluation of the site and the activity to determine  whether the environmental effects of the operation were covered in the Program EIR.”    This Addendum provides the environmental information necessary for the City to make an informed  decision about the Proposed Project.  The City has determined that an Addendum to SEIR No. 339 should  be prepared, rather than a Supplemental or Subsequent EIR, based on the following facts:    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 1-5 Introduction a. As demonstrated in the accompanying Environmental Checklist (see Section 3.0, Environmental  Analysis), the Proposed Project would not require major revisions to the previously certified  SEIR No. 339 because the Project would not result in any new significant impacts to the physical  environment nor would it create substantial increases in the severity of the environmental  impacts previously disclosed in SEIR No. 339.    b. Subsequent to SEIR No. 339, no substantial changes occurred in the circumstances under which  the Proposed Project would be undertaken.    c. Subsequent to SEIR No. 339, no new information of substantial importance has become  available that was not known at the time SEIR No. 339 was prepared.    d. The Proposed Project’s discretionary actions would not result in any new or substantially more  severe significant environmental impacts beyond those disclosed in SEIR No. 339.  The reasonable  consequence of the Proposed Project through approval of the various discretionary and  ministerial actions would also not result in any new or substantially more severe significant  environmental impacts beyond those disclosed in SEIR No. 339.    e. Subsequent to SEIR No. 339, no new mitigation measures or alternatives have been identified that  were infeasible at the time the SEIR was certified and that would substantially reduce the  Approved Project’s significant and unavoidable impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions,  land use and planning, noise, and transportation and traffic.    f. Subsequent to SEIR No. 339, no new mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably  different from those analyzed in the SEIR have been identified to reduce the Approved Project’s  significant and unavoidable impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, land use and  planning, noise, and transportation and traffic.    g. Technical reports that evaluate the environmental impacts that could result from implementation  of the Proposed Project were prepared: Appendix A, Biological Resources Assessment;  Appendix B, Jurisdictional Delineation; Appendix C, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment; and  Appendix D, Basis of Design Report.  These technical reports do not identify any new impacts  or substantial increases in impacts to the environment beyond those disclosed in SEIR No. 339.    Based on these facts, the City determined that an addendum to SEIR No. 339 is the appropriate type  of CEQA document to prepare for the Proposed Project.  The purpose of this Addendum is to evaluate  the Proposed Project’s level of impact on the environment in comparison to the existing condition and  Approved Project and SEIR No. 339.    1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY   The Proposed Project would widen Orangewood Avenue from a five‐lane roadway to a six‐lane divided  facility to provide expanded bicycle and pedestrian access from the Santa Ana River to just east of State  Route 57 (SR‐57) at the SR‐57/Orangewood Avenue interchange.  In general, the Project would  incorporate an additional westbound through lane through the Project Site boundaries.  The Project  would also include a pipe line connection in Orangewood Avenue right‐of‐way, generally beginning at  Rampart Street and ending to the east at Eckhoff Street.  In addition, the Proposed Project includes a  change to the jurisdictional boundaries between the City of Anaheim and the City of Orange, west of the  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 1-6 Introduction western levee of the Santa Ana River, north and south or Orangewood Avenue. This proposed  reorganization includes amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map, the Platinum Triangle Master  Land Use Plan (PTMLUP), and other related documents to reflect the new City boundary and potential  future use of the affected property.    1.3 PROJECT BACKGROUND   In October 2010, the City approved the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, which included the  following discretionary approvals: (1) Platinum Triangle Water Supply Assessment; (2) Anaheim  General Plan Amendment No. 2008‐00471; (3) amendments to The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use  Plan (PTMLUP), including The Platinum Triangle Standardized Development Agreement Form; (4)  amendments to The Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone; and (5) Zoning Reclassification  No. 2008‐00222.  SEIR No. 339, which was prepared to evaluate the potential impacts of the Revised  Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, was certified by the Anaheim City Council on October 26, 2010.   As a result of the land use approvals by the City, the development intensities of the PTMU Overlay Zone  were increased to allow up to 18,909 residential units, 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses,  14,340,522 square feet of office uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses.  In addition to the  increase in development intensity, the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project also identified  upgrades to existing infrastructure to serve the proposed increased intensity of land uses.  The  upgrades included roadway improvements, sewer upgrades, two new water wells, a new electrical  substation, natural gas infrastructure improvements, and an additional fire station.    As part of its certification of SEIR No. 339, the City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding  Considerations to address significant and unavoidable environmental impacts that would result from  implementation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project.  These unavoidable impacts  included the following:     Air Quality  o Construction activities associated with the Approved Project would generate  substantially more short‐term air pollutants compared to the Adopted Master Land Use  Plan and would continue to exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District’s  regional significance thresholds.   o Implementation of the Approved Project would generate substantially more long‐term  air pollutants compared to the Adopted Master Land Use Plan and would continue to  exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District’s regional significance thresholds.    o Construction activities would potentially expose sensitive receptors to substantial  pollutant concentrations of NOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5.  o Sensitive land uses within 500 feet of SR‐57 and I‐5 or within the recommended buffer  distances to facilities emitting toxic air contaminants (TACs) may be exposed to  substantial pollutant concentrations.     Greenhouse Gas Emissions  o The Approved Project would generate substantially more greenhouse gas emissions  compared to the Adopted Master Land Use Plan and cumulatively contribute to climate  change impacts in California.  However, the Approved Project would be consistent  statewide and regional greenhouse gas reductions goals.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 1-7 Introduction  Land Use and Planning  o Some development pursuant to the Approved Project would not be compatible with the  Southern California Gas Company’s existing microwave tower.     Noise  o Build‐out of the Approved Project would result in a substantial, permanent increase in  ambient traffic noise levels within the vicinity of existing noise‐sensitive receptors.  o Noise‐sensitive residential units proposed within the Platinum Triangle may be exposed  to mobile‐ and stationary‐source noise levels that exceed State and/or City standards.  o Construction of the Approved Project would generate substantial levels of groundborne  vibration and groundborne noise in the vicinity of vibration‐sensitive land uses.  o Development within the Platinum Triangle could result in a substantial temporary  increase in noise levels in the vicinity of existing noise‐sensitive land uses during  construction activities.     Transportation and Traffic  o Project‐related trip generation would impact levels of service for the area roadway  system.  o The Approved Project would increase traffic volumes on Caltrans facilities.    Nine addenda have been prepared to SEIR No. 339.  Table 1‐1, SEIR No. 339 Addenda Summary Table,  provides a brief summary for each project within the Platinum Triangle for which the City Council  approved an addendum.  The City Council approved amendments to the land use assumptions in Revised  Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, in conjunction with Addendum No. 2‐6, through the approval of  amendments to the Anaheim General Plan, the Platinum Triangle Master Plan Use Plan, and PTMU  Overlay Zone.  These documents, as amended, currently permit development of up to 17,501 residential  units; 4,782,243 square feet of commercial uses; 13,659,103 square feet of office uses, and 1,500,000  square feet of institutional uses. In addition, in 2020 a Sustainable Communities Environmental  Assessment (SCEA) was approved for the Stadium District Sub‐Area A Project, which creates the  framework for the development of Sub‐Area A of the Stadium District of the PTMU Overlay Zone  pursuant to a Disposition and Development Agreement between the City of Anaheim and the Applicant  and a Master Site Plan; refer to Table 1‐2, SCEA Summary Table. It is acknowledged that two addenda  were under preparation at the time of the preparation of this Addendum.    Table  1‐1  SEIR No. 339 Addenda Summary Table     Addendum Title Project Summary Addendum 1: Katella Avenue/ Interstate 5 Undercrossing Improvements Project April 2012 Widen Katella Avenue at the undercrossing with the I-5 between Anaheim Way and Manchester Avenue and to create a fourth through lane of traffic in each direction of travel. Maintain dual left-turn pockets at both intersections. The project area spans approximately 1,000 feet along Katella Avenue, with an area of disturbance encompassing approximately 1.95 acres. SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 1-8 Introduction Addendum Title Project Summary Addendum 2: Platinum Gateway Project December 2012 Develop a 4-story wrap-style residential building with 399 dwelling units, a 5-story parking structure, and public park on 7.01 acres. Amend the Anaheim General Plan and the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) to increase the total number of dwelling units to 18,988 dwelling units; reduce the commercial square footage to 4,795,111 square feet; reduce the office square footage to 14,131,103 square feet; and no change to institutional uses: 1,500,000 square feet. Addendum 3: Platinum Vista Apartments Project October 2014 Develop a 5-story wrap-style residential apartment building with 389 units and a 6-story parking structure (including one subterranean parking level). Amend the Anaheim General Plan and the PTMLUP to allow up to 19,027 dwelling units; 4,735,111 square feet of commercial uses; 14,131,103 square feet of office uses; and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Addendum 4: Amended A- Town Metro Master Site Plan August 2015 Construct eight neighborhood Development Areas ranging in size from 3.1 acres to 5.6 acres on the 43.2-acre site. Develop between 1,400 and 1,746 residential dwelling units; up to 50,000 square feet of commercial/retail uses; and two public parks. Addendum 5: Jefferson Stadium Park Project June 2016 Develop a mixed-use community with 1,079 residential apartments; 14,600 square feet of retail uses; and a 1.11-acre public park. Building 1 is a 5-story wrap-style building with 370 units; Building 2 is a 5-story wrap-style building with 376 units; Building 3 is a 4-story podium building with 333 units and 14,600 square feet of retail space. Amend the Anaheim General Plan to relocate and combine two park sites into one park site. Amend the PTMLUP to allow for 18,909 dwelling units; 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses; 14,340,522 square feet of office uses; and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Addendum 6: LT Platinum Center Development Project September 2016 Mixed-use development with 405 dwelling units; 433,000 gross square feet of commercial uses; a 200-room hotel; 77,000 gross square feet of office uses. Amend the Anaheim General Plan and the PTMLUP to revise the district boundaries to change the LT Platinum Center site from the Gateway District to the Stadium District; reduce the maximum dwelling units to 17,348 units; increase the maximum commercial uses to 4,782,243 square feet; reduce the maximum office space to 9,180,747 square feet; and remove the designation of a public park from the site. Addendum 7: Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard Improvements Project March 2017 Widen Gene Autry Way from four lanes to six lanes with medians and storm drain and stormwater improvements; to widen the west side of State College Boulevard between Gateway Office and Artisan Court to accommodate a southbound right-turn lane and a third through-lane; and to make improvements to the east side of the intersection of State College Boulevard at Gene Autry Way, which is the west entrance to Angel Stadium of Anaheim (Angel Stadium). Additionally, a new intersection on Gene Autry at Union Street would be constructed to provide access to planned development areas. Addendum 8: Orangewood Avenue Improvements (From State College Boulevard to the Santa Ana River) and Eastside of State College Boulevard Improvements (From Orangewood Avenue to Artisan Court) March 2018 Widen Orangewood Avenue from State College Boulevard to Dupont Drive and from Dupont Drive to the Santa Ana River from four lanes to six lanes with the addition of right- turn lanes. Widen State College Boulevard to four lanes between Orangewood Avenue and Artisan Court; north of Artisan Court, the outside lane would become a right-turn pocket into the Angel Stadium of Anaheim parking lots. Road widening to add a new northbound right-turn lane at the Orangewood Avenue Intersection with Rampart Street. Roadway improvements (sidewalk, relocated utilities, landscape planters, block walls, etc.) that were not considered in SEIR No. 339 are also analyzed. SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 1-9 Introduction Addendum Title Project Summary Addendum 9: Orangewood Avenue Improvements (From the Santa Ana River to East of SR-57) Subject Document Subject Project: Widen Orangewood Avenue from a five‐lane roadway to a six‐lane divided facility to provide expanded bicycle and pedestrian access from the Santa Ana River to just east of State Route 57 (SR-57) at the SR-57/Orangewood Avenue interchange. The Proposed Project would also include a water pipe line connection in Orangewood Avenue right-of-way, generally beginning at Rampart Street and ending to the east at Eckhoff Street. In addition, the Proposed Project includes a change to the jurisdictional boundaries between the City of Anaheim and the City of Orange, west of the western levee of the Santa Ana River, north and south or Orangewood Avenue. This proposed reorganization includes amendments to the Anaheim General Plan, Anaheim Zoning Map, and PTMLUP, and other related documents to reflect the new City boundary and potential future use of the affected property.  Addendum 10: 710 E. Katella General Plan, Zoning Map and Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) Amendments (under preparation) Amend the Anaheim General Plan, Anaheim Zoning Map, and PTMLUP to allow the development of up to 120 dwelling units at 710–818 East Katella Avenue and 1815 South Lewis Street. Development of the project site would be subject to the requirements of the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone, including but not limited to, subsequent City Council approval of a Development Agreement. Addendum 11: OC V!be Project General Plan, Zoning Map and Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) Amendments (under preparation) Amend the Anaheim General Plan, Anaheim Zoning Map, and PTMLUP to allow the development of proposed new homes, shopping, dining, entertainment, parks and open spaces around Honda Center and ARTIC transit center   Table  1‐2   SCEA Summary Table   Addendum Title Project Summary SCEA: Stadium District Sub-Area A Project September 2020 The Stadium District Sub-Area A Project creates the framework for the development of Sub-Area A of the Stadium District of the PTMU Overlay Zone pursuant to a Disposition and Development Agreement between the City of Anaheim and the Applicant and a Master Site Plan to allow development of Sub-Area of the Stadium District with up to the development intensities described. Land Use Stadium District Sub-Area A Project Residential (dwelling units) 5,175 Commercial (square feet) 1,750,000 Office (square feet) 2,700,000 Stadium (seats) 45,500 Public Parks (acres) 10-13 Fire Station One station on 1.5 acres     SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 1-10 Introduction 1.4 FORMAT AND CONTENT OF THIS ADDENDUM   The following components comprise this Addendum:    a. Section 1.0, Introduction and Section 2.0, Project Description.    b. The completed Environmental Checklist and its associated analyses (Section 3.0), which  conclude that the Proposed Project would not result in any new significant environmental  impacts or substantially increase the severity of environmental impacts beyond the levels  disclosed in SEIR No. 339.    c. Technical reports and other documentation that evaluate the Proposed Project and/or Project  Site, which are appendices to this Addendum:     Appendix A, Biological Resources Assessment (Michael Baker International, September  2017);     Appendix B, Jurisdictional Delineation (Michael Baker International, January 2018);     Appendix C, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Michael Baker International,  October 2017); and     Appendix D, Basis of Design Report (Michael Baker International, March 2020).    1.5 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST   The City prepared the Proposed Project’s Environmental Checklist per CEQA Guidelines Section  15063(d)(3) and Section 15168(c)(4).  The CEQA Guidelines include a suggested checklist to indicate  whether the conditions set forth in its Section 15162, which would require a Subsequent or Supplemental  EIR, are met, and whether there would be new significant impacts resulting from the Project not examined  in SEIR No. 339.  The checklist is found in Section 3.0 of this Addendum, along with an explanation and  discussion of each significance determination made in the checklist.    For this Addendum, four possible responses to each of the individual environmental issue areas are  included on the checklist:  1. New Significant Impact.  This response indicates when the currently Proposed Project has  changed to such an extent that major revisions of SEIR No. 339 are required due to the  presence of new significant environmental effects.  2. More Severe Impacts.  This response indicates when the circumstances under which the currently  Proposed Project is undertaken have changed to such an extent that major revisions of SEIR No.  339 are required because the severity of previously identified significant effects would  substantially increase.  3. New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact.  This response indicates when new  information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with  the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time SEIR No. 339 was certified indicates that there  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 1-11 Introduction are new mitigation measures or alternatives available to substantially reduce significant  environmental impacts of the currently Proposed Project.  4. No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis.  This response indicates that the currently  Proposed Project would not create a new impact or substantially increase the severity of the  previously identified environmental impact disclosed in SEIR No. 339.    The Environmental Checklist and accompanying explanation of checklist responses provide the  information and analysis necessary to assess relative environmental impacts of the currently Proposed  Project in the context of environmental impacts addressed in SEIR No. 339.  In doing so, the City will  determine the extent of additional environmental review, if any, for the currently Proposed Project.    1.6 DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE   CEQA Guidelines Sections 15150 and 15168(c)(3) and (d)(2) permit and encourage environmental  documents to incorporate by reference other documents that provide relevant data.  The following  documents are incorporated by reference herein and are available for review upon request at the City of  Anaheim (online via email to planning@anaheim.net or by phone [714] 765‐5139) or City of Orange  (online via email to CDInfo@cityoforange.org or by phone [714] 744‐7220):    General Plan for the City of Anaheim:  The General Plan for the City of Anaheim (Anaheim General Plan),  dated May 2004, is a comprehensive, long‐term plan that is a blueprint for the City of Anaheim’s growth  and development.  It covers issues ranging from the physical development of the jurisdiction, such as  general locations, and extent of land uses and supporting infrastructure, to social concerns.  It is  organized into ten Elements (Land Use, Circulation, Green, Public Services and Facilities, Growth  Management, Safety, Noise, Economic Development, Housing, and Community Design Elements) that  address a wide range of subjects and provide goals and policies.     Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Environmental Impact Report No. 330, State Clearinghouse  Number 2003041105:  The Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Environmental Impact Report  No. 330, State Clearinghouse Number 2003041105 (Anaheim General Plan EIR), certified May 25, 2004,  prepared by The Planning Center, addressed the environmental effects associated with the  implementation of the Anaheim General Plan and City of Anaheim Zoning Code Update.  It provided  information pertaining to existing and future environmental settings within the City’s jurisdiction.    Anaheim Municipal Code:  The Anaheim Municipal Code, current through Ordinance 6480, passed March  10, 2020, consists of regulatory, penal, and administrative ordinances of the City of Anaheim.  These  include standards intended to regulate land use, development, health and sanitation, water quality,  public facilities, and public safety.  Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Zoning (Anaheim Zoning  Code), is utilized to promote growth of the City in an orderly manner, and to promote and protect the  public health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare in conformance with the Anaheim General  Plan.    The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, August 2004, EDAW, Inc., as amended:  The Platinum  Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP), dated August 2004, as amended, prepared by EDAW, Inc.,  serves as the blueprint for development within the Platinum Triangle. It establishes planning principles,  applicable land use policies, allowable development intensities, and design guidelines.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 1-12 Introduction The Platinum Triangle Subsequent EIR No. 332, State Clearinghouse No. 2004121045:  The Platinum  Triangle Subsequent EIR No. 332, State Clearinghouse No. 2004121045 (SEIR No. 332), dated 2005,  prepared by The Planning Center, addressed the environmental effects associated with adopting the  PTMLUP.  It provided information pertaining to existing and future environmental settings within the City’s  jurisdiction.    The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339,  August 2010, The Planning Center:  The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent  Environmental Impact Report No. 339 (SEIR No. 339), dated 2005, prepared by The Planning Center,  addressed the environmental effects associated with the implementation of the Revised Platinum  Triangle Expansion Project (herein referenced as the Approved Project) in the City of Anaheim,  California.  The City of Anaheim proposed to increase the amount of residential, commercial, office,  and institutional development intensities permitted in the Platinum Triangle.  The Approved Project  reduced the amount of office and commercial square footage and increased the number of residential  units being requested as compared to the previous Platinum Triangle Expansion Project analyzed in  Final SEIR No. 334.  These modifications were made to improve the overall jobs/housing balance in  the Platinum Triangle at buildout, encourage a full range of transit‐oriented development  opportunities for the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC), and reduce traffic  impacts to the City of Orange.  Since this time, the SEIR No. 339 has been amended as a result of eight  subsequent addenda.      Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan:  The City of Anaheim Public Works Department drafted the  Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan (PTIP), originally drafted in August 2006, and subsequently  updated most recently as Update No. 4, dated March 2016.  The PTIP was based on the PTMLUP and  associated documentation and includes descriptions of necessary street, sewer, and storm drain  improvements to support PTMLUP development.  The PTIP is intended as a planning tool for programming  and funding decisions based on development patterns and intensity and foreseeable revenue streams  available.       Orange General Plan:  The Orange General Plan, dated March 2010, is the primary source of long‐range  planning and policy direction that is used to guide growth and change, and to preserve and enhance the  quality of life within the City of Orange.  It is organized into 11 Elements (Land Use, Circulation and  Mobility, Housing, Natural Resources, Public Safety, Noise, Cultural Resources and Historic Preservation,  Infrastructure, Economic Development, Urban Design, and Growth Management Elements) that address  a wide range of subjects and provide goals and policies.     Orange General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report:  The Orange General Plan Program  Environmental Impact Report (Orange General Plan PEIR), State Clearinghouse No. 2006031117, dated  March 2010, prepared by EDAW, Inc., addressed the environmental effects associated with the  implementation of the Orange General Plan and City of Orange Zoning Code Update (Orange Zoning Code).   It provided information pertaining to existing and future environmental settings within the City’s  jurisdiction.    Orange Municipal Code:  The Orange Municipal Code, current through Ordinance No. 06‐20, adopted  February 11, 2020 (Supp. No. 42, 4/20), consists of regulatory, penal, and administrative ordinances of  the City of Orange.  These include standards intended to regulate land use, development, health and  sanitation, water quality, public facilities, and public safety.  Title 17 of the Orange Municipal Code, Zoning  (Orange Zoning Code), is utilized to promote public safety, health, convenience, comfort, prosperity, or  general welfare.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 2-1 Project Description 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION   2.1 PROJECT LOCATION   The Proposed Project is west of, the SR‐57/Orangewood Avenue interchange, approximately 0.63‐mile  east of I‐5; refer to Exhibit 2‐1, Regional Vicinity, and Exhibit 2‐2, Site Vicinity.   Specifically, the Project  Site is located in the City of Anaheim and the City of Orange, within Orange County Flood Control District  (OCFCD) rights‐of‐way.  The municipal boundary for the cities of Anaheim and Orange is along the  western right‐of‐way boundary of the Santa Ana River.  Although the Project Site is in both the City of  Anaheim and the City of Orange, the City of Anaheim is the Project sponsor, and the Lead Agency for the  purposes of CEQA.  The SR‐57/Orangewood Avenue interchange serves as a major gateway to the City of  Anaheim and the Project would serve future increases in vehicles in the Project areas because of future  development of Platinum Triangle in the City of Anaheim.      2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The Project Site and surrounding vicinity is located within an urbanized area of the cities of Orange and  Anaheim.  Currently, the Project Site encompasses Orangewood Avenue, with five travel lanes (two  westbound lanes and three eastbound lanes).  In addition, the Proposed Project includes a change to the  jurisdictional boundaries between the City of Anaheim and the City of Orange, west of the western levee  of the Santa Ana River, north and south of Orangewood Avenue, from the southern City of Anaheim  boundary to the SR‐57. The Santa Ana River traverses the western portion of the Project Site and flows  in a southern direction.  The Santa Ana River Trail includes existing paved bike and pedestrian trail access  along both sides of the Santa Ana River.  Orangewood Avenue provides access to the trail from the west  side of the Santa Ana River.  At the Santa Ana River, Orangewood Avenue consists of an existing bridge  structure constructed in 1966 and widened in 1981 (on the south side only).  The trail under‐crosses the  Orangewood Avenue bridge structure in this location.  To the east of the Orangewood Avenue bridge  structure, the SR‐57/Orangewood Avenue interchange, which includes the Orangewood Avenue  Undercrossing bridge structure, is present.        Existing land uses near the Project Site consist of the following institutional and commercial uses:     North:  Upstream areas of the Santa Ana River are present to the north.  SR‐57 also continues  north of the Project Site.  Both City of Anaheim and City of Orange planning documents identify  the Santa Ana River; however, the river in this location is located within the City of Orange.  The  Anaheim General Plan designates the Santa Ana River as Open Space; however, since it is not  located within the City of Anaheim, the Anaheim Municipal Code does not identify a zone for this  area.  The Orange Zoning Code zones the Santa Ana River as Recreational Open Space (R‐O), and  the Orange General Plan designates the site as Open Space (OS).  Angel Stadium of Anaheim  [Angel Stadium]) and the associated parking lot are located to the north of the Project Site.  The  Anaheim General Plan designates this property for Mixed‐Use Urban Core land use, and it is  within “PR” Public Recreational Zone and Sub‐Area A of the Stadium District of the PTMU Overlay  Zone of the Anaheim Zoning Map.  Commercial/office uses are present to the north of the  eastern portion of the Project Site, within the City of Orange; the Orange General Plan designates  these properties for Neighborhood Office Professional (NOP) land use at a maximum 0.5 FAR;  and, they are within the Office Professional (O‐P) Zone of the Orange Zoning Map.       PACI F IC OCEAN ORANGE COUNTY SAN DIEGO COUNTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOS ANGELES COUNTY 261 241 241 142 1 1 22 39 5 5 5 133 55 405 405 605 15 5 57 91 72 91 71 90 74 73 IMPERIAL HWY. EDINGER AVE. WARNER AVE. IR VIN E B L V D. CROWN VALLEY P K W Y. E A S T E RN TRANS. CORR. W HITTIE R BLVD. BEACH BLVD. EL TO R O RD. S ANTIA GO CA N Y O N RD. CHAPMAN AVE. I RVIN E CENTER DR. MOULTON PRKY. STREET OF THE G OLDEN LANTERN JAM BOREE RD. MAC ARTHUR BLVD. O LD NEW PO R T BL V D . Y O RBA LINDA BLVD . S A N JOAQUIN HILLS TRA NS. CORRIDOR PROP. FOOT HI L L TRANS. CORRIDOR HARBOR BLVD. KATELLA AVE. Newport Beach San Clemente Santa Ana Anaheim Fullerton La Habra Brea Cypress Buena Park Yorba Linda Villa Park Anaheim Hills Mission Viejo Lake Forest Laguna Beach Dana Point San Juan Capistrano Laguna Niguel Orange Huntington Beach Costa Mesa Seal Beach Garden Grove Tustin Irvine Los Alamitos - Project Site Project Site ORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Exhibit 2-1 Regional Vicinity NOT TO SCALE 11/17 | JN 159416 ORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Exhibit 2-2 Site Vicinity NOT TO SCALE 06/21 | JN 159416 Temporary Impacts Permanent Impacts Proposed City Boundary Santa Ana River Reorganization Area Source: Aerial - Google Earth Pro, June 2021. SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 2-4 Project Description  East:  Orangewood Avenue continues east of the Project Site.  Commercial (office) uses are  present to the east of the Project Site.  These properties are within the City of Orange; the Orange  General Plan designates these properties for NOP land use; and the properties are within the O‐ P and Commercial Professional (C‐P) Zone of the Orange Zoning Map.       South:  The North Net Fire Training Facility is located southwest of the Project Site.  This property  is within the City of Anaheim; the Anaheim General Plan designates this property for Mixed‐Use  Urban Core land use; and, it is within the “PR” Public Recreational Zone and Sub‐Area B of the  Orangewood District of the PTMU Overlay Zoe of the Anaheim Zoning Map.  The Santa Ana River  flows south of the Project Site.  The Anaheim General Plan designates this area for Open Space  land use; as discussed above, the property is not within any identified zone on the Anaheim  Zoning Map.  This area is also within the R‐O Zone of the Orange Zoning Map, and designated as  OS in the Orange General Plan.  SR‐57 is also present to the south of the Project Site.  Further  southeast of the interchange, single‐family residential uses (designated by the Orange General  Plan as Low Density Residential 02‐6 DU/AC [LDR] and zoned by the Orange Zoning Code as Single  Family Residential 6,000 square feet [R‐1‐6]) are present.     West:  Orangewood Avenue continues west of the Project Site.  Commercial, office, and industrial  uses (Karl Strauss Brewing Company and the Orangewood Stadium Business Park) are present to  the southwest of the Project Site.  The Anaheim General Plan designates these properties for  Mixed‐Use Urban Code land‐use; the properties are within the   “C‐G” General Commercial, “O‐L” Low‐Intensity Office, “I” industrial Zones, and Sub‐Area A of  the Orangewood District of the PTMU Overlay Zone of the Anaheim Zoning Map.      2.3 PROPOSED PROJECT   The City proposes to widen Orangewood Avenue from a five‐lane roadway to a six‐lane divided facility to  provide expanded vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian access; refer to Exhibit 2‐3, Site Plan.  The Proposed  Project would incorporate an additional westbound through lane through the Project Site boundaries.   In order to widen the roadway, the Project would widen the existing Orangewood Avenue bridge  structure over the Santa Ana River.  Bridge widening improvements would involve widening the bridge  approximately 30 to 35 feet on the north side to accommodate the proposed six travel lanes and  associated bicycle lane/sidewalk.  The proposed total bridge length would be 348 feet, 6 inches.  In  addition, the Proposed Project includes a change to the jurisdictional boundaries between the City of  Anaheim and the City of Orange, west of the western levee of the Santa Ana River, north and south or  Orangewood Avenue. This proposed reorganization includes amendments to the General Plan, Zoning  Map, PTMLUP, and other related documents to reflect the new City boundary and potential future use  of the affected property.    SEIR No. 339 describes roadway improvements for potential intersection mitigation and fair‐share  improvements necessary for development of Platinum Triangle (referenced herein as the “Approved  Project”.  Upon certification of SEIR No. 339, the City of Anaheim prepared the Platinum Triangle  Implementation Plan (PTIP).  As discussed in Section 1.6, Documents Incorporated by Reference, the PTIP  includes descriptions of necessary street, sewer, and storm drain improvements to support PTMLUP  development.  As such, the PTIP, and associated SEIR No. 339, considered development of necessary  street improvements, which included “Project 3D”, the widening of Orangewood Avenue from the City’s  municipal boundaries to the SR‐57 interchange; refer to Exhibit 2‐4, Platinum Triangle Implementation  Plan – Orangewood Avenue Improvements.  The PTIP proposed these improvements to ensure   ORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Exhibit 2-3 Site Plan NOT TO SCALE 05/20 | JN 159416 N. ECKHOFF STREET ORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Exhibit 2-4 Plantinum Triangle Implementation Plan - Orangewood Avenue Improvements NOT TO SCALE 11/17 | JN 159416 Source: City of Anaheim, Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan Orangewood Avenue Alignment East City Limit to 400’E/O SR-57, Sheets O-4 and O-5, dated October 2015. SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 2-7 Project Description acceptable operations through the area and accommodate the Approved Project’s land use intensities.   Project 3D improvements (the Approved Project) addressed under SEIR No. 339 included widening the  existing Orangewood Avenue bridge structure 24 feet, from five lanes (71 feet width) to six lanes (95 feet  width).  The Approved Project proposed widening with the addition of a new westbound travel lane  beginning at the City of Anaheim municipal boundary and trending east, ending just west of the SR‐ 57/Orangewood Avenue northbound off‐ramp.  The roadway widening would occur along a segment of  the existing roadway, spanning approximately a half mile.  Project 3D also proposed the installation of an  approximately 70‐foot long, three‐foot‐tall retaining wall within Caltrans jurisdiction along the north side  of the Orangewood Avenue Undercrossing.        This Addendum identifies specific project changes that are necessary to accommodate the existing and  proposed PTMLUP development intensities.  These changes include additional widening of the bridge  structure over the Santa Ana River, new property acquisition in OCFCD right‐of‐way, Santa Ana River Trail  realignment, drainage facility relocation in the Santa Ana River, a water pipe line connection, and a  change to the jurisdictional boundaries of land along the Santa Ana River more particularly described  below.  This Project, as proposed, would not construct the widening and retaining wall within Caltrans  right‐of‐way, which were considered as part of the Approved Project.  The specific Project design  information, not known at the time of certification of the SEIR No. 339, is available at this time and  detailed in Section 2.3.1, Orangewood Avenue Right‐Of‐Way Acquisition, through Section 2.3.4, Pipe Line  Connection, below.      As referenced in the previous paragraph, the Proposed Project includes a realignment of a portion of the  municipal boundary between the City of Anaheim and City of Orange along the Santa Ana River between  approximately 1,000 feet south of Orangewood Avenue and approximately 1,000 feet south of Katella  Avenue.  The boundary adjustment would annex outside land from the City of Orange, into the City of  Anaheim’s city boundaries.  Prior to the review and approval of the reorganization by the Orange County  Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), the City is required to amend its General Plan and Zoning  Map (“Reclassification) to reflect the intended use of the subject properties (as described below, in  Section 2.3.6, Santa Ana River Reorganization).  This process has already been completed for a portion  of the Angel Stadium property, referred to as Area 2A (Stadium Sliver) and has yet to be completed for  the remainder of the area subject to the boundary reorganization; however, all properties are within the  City’s sphere of influence and designated for certain land uses in the City’s General Plan.  As shown below  in Section 2.3.6 Table 2‐1, Santa Ana River Reorganization, indicates the General Plan and  Reclassifications that are a part of the Proposed Project.  In addition to amendments to the General Plan  Land Use Element and the Zoning Map, the Proposed Project would amend the City boundaries, as  depicted in the General Plan and on the Zoning Map, to reflect the reorganization; and, amend the  Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, to expand the boundaries of the Platinum Triangle to  incorporate the Proposed Project.    SEIR No. 339 Section 4.3.1, Location and Land Use, describes the Platinum Triangle as:  “The Platinum Triangle is an 820‐acre area located within the City of Anaheim.  The project area  is comprised of the Angel Stadium of Anaheim, Honda Center, the Anaheim Stadium  Metrolink/Amtrak Station, various light industrial uses, industrial parks, distribution facilities,  offices, hotels, public recreation areas, and residential and supporting retail uses.  The project  area is bounded by the Santa Ana River to the east, the Anaheim City Limit to the south  (approximately Orangewood Avenue and State College Boulevard), I‐5 to the west, SR‐57 to the  east, and the Southern California Edison easement (approximately Cerritos Avenue) to the north.   The project area is accessible by motor vehicles from I‐5, SR‐57, Katella Avenue, State College  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 2-8 Project Description Boulevard, Orangewood Avenue, Lewis Street, and Anaheim Way.  Additional access is provided  through the Anaheim Stadium Metrolink/Amtrak station adjacent to the stadium.”  The proposed realignment of a portion of the city boundary between the City of Anaheim and City of  Orange, would maintain the eastern boundary of the Platinum Triangle as the Santa Ana River.   However, the Proposed Project would slightly increase the area of the Platinum Triangle to encompass  the portion of the property currently within City of Orange that is the subject of this realignment.  As  described in Section 2.3.6, the Proposed Project would amend the General Plan, Zoning Map, and  Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan to reflect the anticipated future use of this area within the  City of Anaheim.  As described in this Addendum, the implementation of these amendments would  result in nominal changes in land use in comparison to the existing use and future use of the subject  area, as currently permitted by General Plan, Zoning, and Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan.    2.3.1 ORANGEWOOD AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION   The Approved Project considered the widening of Orangewood Avenue from the City’s municipal  boundaries to the SR‐57 interchange within the existing roadway right‐of‐way; refer to Exhibit 2‐4.   However, to accommodate these improvements, the City would need to acquire new right‐of‐way from  OCFCD.  Construction activities associated with the Orangewood Avenue right‐of‐way acquisition would  temporarily impact an approximately 1.12‐acre area of the Santa Ana River.  Temporary activities  occurring within this area would include placement of shoring, driving of foundation piles, construction  of bent caps and piers, construction of the bridge, scour countermeasure (e.g., modified bridge footings  or placement of a permeable articulated concrete block [ACB] mat, or other alternative), and relocation  of an existing drainage outfall.        Although the Project would require some areas of permanent take within the Santa Ana River, the Project  would not require any permanent right‐of‐way acquisition of private properties.  Other than those  improvements within the Santa Ana River, all permanent improvements would occur within existing  roadway rights‐of‐way.    2.3.2 BRIDGE STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS   The Approved Project considered widening the bridge structure by 24 feet and restriping the roadway  to accommodate an additional westbound travel lane.  However, the Proposed Project would widen the  north side of the Orangewood Avenue bridge structure over the Santa Ana River approximately 30 to  35 feet to accommodate the bicycle and sidewalk facilities.  The proposed total bridge length would be  348 feet, 6 inches.  The Proposed Project would expand six existing bridge pier walls and install five new  debris noses to support the proposed bridge widening.      2.3.3 TRAIL AND STORMWATER FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS   The Approved Project did not specifically consider necessary improvements in order to maintain existing  access to the Santa Ana River Trail and stormwater facilities.  In order to accommodate the new bridge  widening, the Santa Ana River Trail would need to be realigned along the western portion of the Santa  Ana River, and reconstructed in‐place at the eastern portion.  New retaining walls would be installed  along the eastern portion of the trail under the widened Orangewood Avenue bridge structure.  Also, the  existing drainage facility located at the eastern portion of the Santa Ana River would need to be relocated  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 2-9 Project Description slightly north of the existing location; as depicted on Exhibit 2‐3.  Existing access to the Santa Ana River  Trail from Orangewood Avenue would be maintained.      2.3.4 PIPE LINE CONNECTION   The Approved Project considered construction of new subsurface water facilities in Orangewood  Avenue right‐of‐way (a proposed 16‐inch water pipe line) as far east as the City’s municipal boundary  (PTIP Project 3C).  However, the Approved Project did not consider extension of this 16‐inch pipe line  through the Project site.  The Proposed Project would construct a new 16‐inch ductile iron water pipe  line in Orangewood Avenue right‐of‐way, generally beginning at the City’s municipal boundary and  ending to the east at Eckhoff Street.  This new pipe line would connect the proposed 16‐inch water pipe  line, being constructed as PTIP Project 3C, to the existing 10‐inch water pipe line in the City of Orange  (in Eckhoff Street right‐of‐way).  The new pipe line connection would enhance the City of Orange’s  existing water system, providing redundancy should failure arise in other areas of the system.  The water  line would affect an approximately half‐mile segment of Orangewood Avenue as shown on Exhibit 2‐3.      2.3.5 CONSTRUCTION AND PHASING   Construction activities associated with the Proposed Project would occur following acquisition of the  required parcels.  The Project proposes a 12‐month construction period (anticipated to begin March 2022  and completed by February 2023).      2.3.6 SANTA ANA RIVER REORGANIZATION   The Project proposes to reorganize land within the Project area through a municipal boundary adjustment  within the Project limits to annex land outside of the City limits (currently in the City of Orange) into the  City of Anaheim, incorporating properties within the City’s sphere of influence and expanding the  boundaries of Platinum Triangle; see Exhibit 2‐5, Santa Ana River Reorganization Area. The proposed  boundary adjustment would require review and approval by the LAFCO.  Prior to review and approval of  the boundary adjustment by the LAFCO, the City is required to amend the land use designations and  zoning on the properties proposed for annexation to reflect their intended uses.  As such, Table 2‐1, Santa  Ana River Reorganization, shows the existing and proposed land use designations and zoning for the areas  proposed for annexation.      Area 1A and Area 1    As shown on Exhibit 2‐5, “Area 1A North Net Sliver” (Area 1A) and “Area 1 OCFCD Excess” (Area 1) are  located south of Orangewood Avenue and bound by North Net Training Center (2400 Orangewood  Avenue) to the west and the Santa Ana River Trail to the east.  The proposed reorganization would realign  a sliver of the North Net Training Center property to allow the entire parcel to be located within the  Anaheim city limits.  This sliver would continue to provide operational use for the North Net Training  Center and would be incorporated with the proposed acquisition.  North Net is currently in the process of  acquiring property from OCFCD for its continued use.    As shown on Exhibit 2‐6, Existing General Plan Land Use Map, and Exhibit 2‐7, Proposed General Plan Land  Use Map, the General Plan land use designation for Areas 1 and 1A would be amended from Open Space  to Mixed‐Use Urban Core.  As shown on Exhibit 2‐8, Existing Zoning Map, and Exhibit 2‐9, Proposed Zoning  Map, Areas 1 and 1A would be zoned “PR” Public Recreational Zone and Sub Area B of the  ORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS Exhibit 2-5 Santa Ana River Reorganizational Area 10/2021 JN 159416 ORANGEWOOD AVE RAMP A R T STD OU GL AS S RDDUPONT DRTOWNE CENTRE P L AREA 2 OCFCD EXCESS AREA 2A STADIUM SLIVER (Not a part of the project) AREA 1 OCFCD EXCESS AREA 1A NORTH NET SLIVER AREA 3 CITY OF ORANGE ROADCity of Anaheim City of Orange North Net Angel Stadium 0 800400 Feet Key to Features 57 3 2A 2 1A 1 Area Project Site City Boundary Proposed City Boundary Parcel Boundary ORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Exhibit 2-6 Existing General Plan Land Use Map 10/2021 JN 159416 ORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Exhibit 2-7 Proposed General Plan Land Use Map 10/2021 JN 159416 ORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Exhibit 2-8 Existing Zoning Map 10/2021 JN 159416 ORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Exhibit 2-9 Proposed Zoning Map 10/2021 JN 159416 SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 2-15 Project Description Table  2‐1  Santa Ana River Reorganization    Area Subject to Reorganization Existing General Plan Designation Existing Zoning Proposed General Plan Designation Proposed Zoning Area 1 OCFCD Excess Area 1A North Net Sliver Open Space None Mixed-Use Urban Core Public Recreational (PR) Zone Platinum Triangle Mixed- Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone Orangewood District Sub Area B Area 2 OCFCD Excess Open Space None Park Public Recreational (PR) Zone Area 3 City of Orange Road Primary Arterial Not Applicable Primary Arterial (No Change) Not Applicable Remaining Area Open Space None Open Space (No Change) Open Space (OS) Zone   Orangewood District of the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone.  This is the same General  Plan land use designation and zoning as the existing North Net Training Center.    The Mixed‐Use Urban Core designation allows a mix of uses including residential, commercial, services,  hotel, and professional office uses in a high‐quality environment.  The focus of this designation is on  creating a pedestrian‐friendly environment, including increased connectivity and community gathering  spaces.  Uses may mix in a vertical, horizontal, or multi‐use pattern.  Stand‐alone uses within a multi‐use  project need to integrate into an overall project design and connected to other adjoining uses by plazas,  promenades, and landscaped corridors; and, should include common architectural themes and signage.   Typical residential uses could include stacked flats, live‐work units, and artist‐style lofts.  The maximum  density for the residential component of mixed‐use development is up to 100 dwelling units per acre.  The  maximum floor area ratio for the nonresidential component of mixed‐use development is 3.00.     The intent of the PTMU Overlay Zone is to provide opportunities for well‐designed development projects  that combine residential with non‐residential uses.  The non‐residential uses include office, retail,  business services, personal services, public spaces and uses, and other community amenities within the  portions of the Platinum Triangle designated with the Mixed‐Use, Office High and Office Low land use  designations in the Anaheim General Plan, and consistent with the policy direction in the Anaheim General  Plan.  The PTMU Overlay Zone has the following major objectives:     Create a unique integrated, walkable urban environment that encourages pedestrian activity and  reduces dependence on the automobile for everyday needs, through a connected streetscape  that is attractive, safe, and engaging;   Develop an overall urban design framework to ensure that the appearance and effects of  buildings, improvements, and uses are harmonious with the character of the area in which they  are located;   Encourage compatibility between residential, office, commercial and sports entertainment uses;   Reinforce Transit Oriented Development (TOD) opportunities around the Anaheim Regional  Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC) station;  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 2-16 Project Description  Maintain and enhance connectivity and linkages with convenience services, dining, retail, and  recreation facilities within walking distance, by providing ground floor commercial uses in key  locations;   Provide a mix of housing types;   Create great long‐lasting neighborhoods that maintain value through buildings with architectural  qualities that create attractive street scenes;   Provide a variety of open space, including private, recreational‐leisure areas and public parks;   Create a balance of landscape and architecture by providing sufficient planting space; and   Encourage parking solutions that are incentives for creative planning and sustainable  neighborhood design.    The proposed reclassification to the PTMU Overlay Zone would not increase the maximum permitted  development above the 321 dwelling units previously analyzed in the SEIR No. 339 for Sub Area B of the  Orangewood District of the PTMU Overlay Zone.  In the event the subject properties, including the existing  North Net Training Center, are considered for future development, the maximum development intensity  of 321 dwelling units would apply to all of Sub Area B.  However, this is not anticipated in the near future  at this time.    Area 2     “Area 2 OCFCD Excess” (Area 2) is located north of Orangewood Avenue and consists of a regional bike  trail and landscaping.  The City is currently studying the potential to purchase Area 2 from the OCFCD for  the development of a park as part of a future, separate and independent project. A General Plan  Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment would be required to change Area 2 land use designation from  Open Space to Parks and zoning to the “PR” Public Recreational Zone; refer to Exhibits 2‐6 through 2‐9.   The Parks designation allows for active and passive recreational uses such as parks, trails, athletic fields,  interpretive centers, and golf courses.  The Parks land designation permits a maximum floor area ratio of  0.10.  The PR zone implements the Parks land use designation.  The intent of the PR zone is to establish  for the benefit of the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Anaheim and its visitors, a zone  to preserve, regulate, and control the orderly use and enjoyment of City‐owned properties and facilities  and adjacent private property.  Properties within the purview of the PR zone include: (a) City‐owned  properties, whether the same is exclusively occupied by the City or is used by others on the basis of some  agreement with or concession by the City; and (b) adjacent private properties, whose uses and  development have an impact on the use and enjoyment of City‐owned properties and facilities.    Area 3 and Remaining Area    The General Plan Circulation Element would continue to designate Area 3, Orangewood Avenue, as a  Primary Arterial.  The General Plan Land Use Element would continue to designate the remaining area  north and south of Orangewood Avenue, between the Proposed City Boundary and Areas 1, 1A, 2 and 2A,  for Open Space land use. The Open Space land use designation applies to properties intended to remain  in natural open space; utility easements that will provide recreational and trail access to Anaheim’s  residents; heavily landscaped freeway remnant parcels, and land areas surrounding major water features.  The Proposed Project would apply the OS Zone to this area.  The OS Zone is the implementing Zone for  the General Plan Open Space land use designation and permits a maximum floor area ratio of 0.10.   Currently, the City of Anaheim Zoning Map does not include this area within any Zone.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 2-17 Project Description The changes to the City jurisdictional boundaries would require amendments to the General Plan Land  Use Element, Zoning Map, and Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan; refer to Exhibit 2‐10, Proposed  Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan.    2.3.7 PROJECT APPROVALS   This Addendum to SEIR No. 339 serves as the primary CEQA environmental document for all actions  associated with the Proposed Project, including all discretionary approvals requested or required to  implement the Project.  The actions and/or approvals by the City of Anaheim to implement the Project  include, but are not limited to, the following:    Approval of the Addendum No. 9 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent  Environmental Impact Report No. 339;   Right‐of‐Way Construction Permit.  The City is requesting issuance of a right‐of‐way construction  permit for construction activities.   Acquisition of Property.  The City is requesting approval for acquisition of OCFCD property for  construction activities and Project implementation.   General Plan Amendment.  The City is requesting to amend the City boundaries as depicted in  the General Plan to annex land outside of the City limits into Anaheim and designate the annexed  properties, as applicable, for their anticipated future land use.   Zoning Map Amendment (“Reclassification”).  The City is requesting to amend the City  boundaries as depicted on the Zoning Map to annex land outside of the City limits into Anaheim  and reclassify the annexed properties to the implementing zones for their General Plan land use  designations.   Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan Amendment.  The City is requesting to expand the  boundaries of the Platinum Triangle to incorporate land proposed for annexation into the  Anaheim City limits.   Property Tax Exchange Approval.  The City is requesting approval for the exchange of property  tax revenues associated with the land proposed for annexation between the City of Anaheim  and City of Orange.   City Boundary Reorganization approval/recommendation.   District 5 Incorporation Approval.  Approvals by other agencies would include, but may not be limited to, the following:   City of Orange Encroachment Permit;    City of Orange Property Tax Exchange Approval;   Caltrans Encroachment Permit;   City of Orange Property Tax Exchange Approval;   U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14 ‐ Linear Transportation Projects  and Section 408 Permit;   California Department of Fish and Wildlife 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement;   ORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Exhibit 2-10 Proposed Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan NOT TO SCALE 10/21 | JN 159416 SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 2-19 Project Description    Regional Water Quality Control Board Section 401 Water Quality Certification;    City and Regional Water Quality Control Board approvals of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention  Plan (SWPPP); and    Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) City Boundary Reorganization  Approval.      SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 2-20 Project Description This page intentionally left blank. SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-1 Environmental Analysis 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS   ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED   The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this Project, involving at least  one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.   Aesthetics  Mineral Resources   Agriculture and Forestry Resources  Noise   Air Quality  Population and Housing   Biological Resources  Public Services   Cultural Resources  Recreation   Energy  Transportation   Geology and Soils  Tribal Cultural Resources   Greenhouse Gas Emissions  Utilities and Service Systems   Hazards and Hazardous Materials  Wildfire   Hydrology and Water Quality  Mandatory Findings of Significance   Land Use and Planning      On the basis of this initial evaluation:     I find that the Proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a  NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.   I find that although the Proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there  will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or  agreed to by the project proponent.  A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.   I find that the Proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an  ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.   I find that the Proposed Project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially  significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been  adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has  been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached  sheets.  An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that  remain to be addressed.   I find that although the Proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment,  because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier  ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards,  and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT  or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the  Proposed Project, nothing further is required.      Signature      Date  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-2 Environmental Analysis This page intentionally left blank. SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-3 Environmental Analysis 3.1 AESTHETICS   Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?  b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?  c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?  d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?    a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 determined that the Approved  Project does not contain any scenic vistas that are officially recognized at a local, State, or Federal level.   The Initial Study concluded that impacts to scenic vistas would be less than significant and no mitigation  measures were necessary.  Because the Initial Study considered these impacts less than significant, they  were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis: Generally, scenic vistas are defined as a view of undisturbed natural lands  exhibiting a unique or unusual feature that comprises an important or dominant portion of the viewshed.   Scenic vistas may also be represented by a distant view that provides visual relief from less attractive  views of nearby features.  Other designated Federal and State lands, as well as local open space or  recreational areas, may also offer scenic vistas if they represent a valued aesthetic view within the  surrounding landscape of nearby features.  The Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element designates the  Santa Ana River, the Hill and Canyon Area, and open space areas as scenic resources and encourages the  preservation and protection of these areas.  The Orange General Plan Natural Resources Element  designates the Santiago Hills II and Irvine Lake, grassy valleys, rugged hillsides, rock outcroppings, and  winding canyons present in the east Orange portions of its planning area as scenic resources and  encourages the preservation and protection of these areas while still allowing development to occur.     The Proposed Project would occur within a highly urbanized area of Anaheim and Orange where existing  development blocks public views to Anaheim’s Hill and Canyon Area and open space and Orange’s scenic  resources (Santiago Hills II and east Orange resources).  Project construction activities associated with the  trail improvements and bridge improvements at Orangewood Avenue as it crosses the Santa Ana River  would involve short‐term visual impacts to public views of the River (an Anaheim‐designated scenic  resource) due to the presence of construction equipment and heavy‐duty vehicles, materials and debris  piles, and other general construction activities.  However, these impacts would be temporary and limited  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-4 Environmental Analysis to the Project’s construction duration.  Further, Project improvements would occur along a segment of  the Santa Ana River where channelization has already heavily degraded significant natural features.     The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana  River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  Any future development of these sites would be subject to CEQA and analyzed on  a per project basis.  However, given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be  similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact to  aesthetics would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Therefore, the Proposed Project would not obstruct views of the Santa Ana River over the long term.   Impacts to scenic vistas would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not substantially  increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.      b) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 determined that the Platinum  Triangle is not located within the viewshed of a State scenic highway.  The closest Officially Designated  State Scenic Highway to the Platinum Triangle is SR‐91 from SR‐55 to east of the City’s limit near Weir  Canyon.  The Initial Study concluded that impacts to scenic resources would be less than significant since  the Platinum Triangle is not visible from SR‐91, nor is SR‐91 visible from the Platinum Triangle.  Because  the Initial Study considered these impacts less than significant, they were not further analyzed in SEIR No.  339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  According to the California Department of Transportation’s (Caltrans)  California Scenic Highway Mapping System, the Project area does not contain any officially‐designated  scenic highways.2  As indicated in the Initial Study for SEIR No. 339, the nearest eligible scenic highway is  SR‐91, which is located more than four miles northeast of the Project Site.  The Project Site does not  provide views of SR‐91 due to intervening topography, structures, and vegetation.  Due to the absence of  designated scenic highways in the Project Site vicinity, no impact would occur, and the level of impact  would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    c) Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality??   This impact threshold was modified by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) in 2018.  The  changes to this threshold of significance consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Specifically, consideration of degradation of character or quality was clarified for urbanized areas.     2  California Department of Transportation Website, California Scenic Highway Mapping System,  http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/index.htm, Accessed October 11, 2017.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-5 Environmental Analysis Although the specific language for this threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered  in the SEIR No. 339 on page 5.1‐9 of SEIR No. 339.  Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 classifies the Platinum Triangle as an area  transitioning from light industrial to mixed use development in accordance with the adopted PTMLUP.   Despite the increased intensity of residential and nonresidential land uses, SEIR No. 339 found that  compliance with provisions of the adopted PTMLUP would ensure the individual projects are compatible  with existing and future land uses within the Platinum Triangle.  SEIR No. 339 concluded that impacts to  visual character and quality would be less than significant with the incorporation of SEIR No. 332  Mitigation Measure (MM) 5.1‐1, which requires a shade analysis for shadow‐sensitive properties.      Project-Specific Analysis:  As discussed in Section 2.0, the Project Site consists of paved asphalt  roadway right‐of‐way and a regional bike trail, surrounded by channelized portions of the Santa Ana River,  SR‐57, commercial, office, institutional, and residential land uses.  Based on the Project’s location within  an urban environment, the Proposed Project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character  or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings.  The following discussion analyzes the Proposed  Project’s potential to conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality.     No applicable municipal or other regulations governing scenic quality apply to the Project Site; refer to  Section 3.11, Land Use and Planning.  The Anaheim General Plan does not identify Orangewood Avenue  as a Scenic Expressway and the Orange General Plan does not identify it as a Viewscape Corridor.  Limited  permanent visual changes associated with the proposed roadway widening and associated infrastructure  and Santa Ana River reorganization would occur because of the Proposed Project.  As such, once  construction is complete, the roadway widening and realignment of jurisdictional boundaries of land  along the Santa Ana River would not significantly impact the visual character of the Project Site.  In  addition, the Proposed Project would not involve aboveground features which are substantially different  from existing conditions.  Visible changes associated with the Proposed Project would include additional  hardscapes associated with the widened Orangewood Avenue bridge structure.  The Proposed Project  would lengthen five existing bents situated along the Santa Ana River bottom to accommodate the  widening.  In addition, the Project would realign a portion of the Santa Ana River Trail along the western  portion of the Santa Ana River, and reconstruct in‐place at the eastern portion.  The Proposed Project  would install new trail walls under the widened Orangewood Avenue bridge structure.  The proposed  amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River  reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific development  project.  Any future development of these sites would be subject to CEQA and analyzed on a per project  basis.  However, given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be similar to what  was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact to groundwater  supplies would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Overall, these features would occur within a heavily disturbed segment of the River that has been subject  to channelization and is generally devoid of natural resources; refer to Section 3.4, Biological Resources.   Based on the similarity of these features to existing conditions, permanent visual changes associated with  the Proposed Project would not significantly impact the visual character of the Project Site.  The Project  also would not result in shade and shadow impacts to adjacent properties and SEIR No. 332 MM 5.1‐1 is  not applicable.  Less than significant impacts would occur in this regard, and the level of impact would not  substantially increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.     Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-6 Environmental Analysis d) Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?   Previous Significance Determination: According to the Initial Study for SEIR No. 339, buildout of the  PTMLUP would introduce numerous new sources of nighttime illumination, including those related to  buildings, pedestrian walkways, parking areas, park facilities, and roadways.  The Initial Study for SEIR No.  339 concluded that compliance with the provisions of the PTMLUP and SEIR No. 332 MM 5.1‐1 would  reduce light and glare impacts to less than significant with mitigation.      Project-Specific Analysis:  To accommodate widening at the Orangewood Avenue Santa Ana River  crossing, the Proposed Project would realign/reconstruct portions of the Santa Ana River Trail located  within OCFCD/City of Orange jurisdiction.  The Proposed Project would relocate existing street lights  occurring at the westerly Orangewood Avenue/SR‐57 signalized intersection to accommodate the new  travel lane.  The Proposed Project’s light sources would be installed to safeguard public safety of  motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists traveling along the affected segment of Orangewood Avenue and  trail users.  Lighting would be similar to existing lighting sources on‐site and along Orangewood Avenue  and designed to avoid light‐spillage onto surrounding uses.   SEIR No. 332 MM 5.1‐1 requires preparation  of a shade/shadow analysis for future development projects where adjacent uses are shadow sensitive.   As a roadway widening and annexation project, SEIR No. 332 MM 5.1‐1 would not be applicable.  The  proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River  reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific development  project.  Any future development of these sites would be subject to CEQA and analyzed on a per project  basis. However, given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be similar to what  was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact to aesthetics would  not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. For these reasons, impacts concerning light or glare  would be less than significant, and the level of impact associated with the Proposed Project would not  increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    3.1.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    SEIR No. 332 mitigation measures are not applicable to the Proposed Project.     Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 mitigation measures are not applicable to the Proposed Project.         SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-7 Environmental Analysis 3.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES   In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?  b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?  c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?  d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?  e. Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?    a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 determined that the Platinum  Triangle and its surrounding vicinity are not located within an area designated as Prime Farmland,  Farmland of Statewide Importance, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Local Importance.  Because there  were no impacts, these resources were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  According to the California Department of Conservation’s Farmland Mapping  and Monitoring Program (FMMP), the Project Site is not located within an area designated Prime  Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, or Farmland of Local Importance.  The affected segment of  Orangewood Avenue and the Santa Ana River reorganization area and all adjoining uses are designated  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-8 Environmental Analysis “Urban and Built‐Up Land.”3  No impact would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that  identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 determined that the Platinum  Triangle and its surrounding vicinity do not include areas zoned for agricultural use or active Williamson  Act contracts.  Because there were no impacts, these resources were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to Impact 3.2 (a) above.  Neither the Project Site, nor its adjoining uses  are zoned for agricultural use or are under a Williamson Act contract.4  Project implementation would not  conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract, and the level of impact would  not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    c) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?   Previous Significance Determination:  Since the Anaheim City Council certified SEIR No. 339, OPR has  revised the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G to include new forestry resources thresholds.  Accordingly, this  Addendum has conducted the review presented below.     Project-Specific Analysis:  Neither the Project Site, nor its adjoining uses are zoned as forest land (as  defined in PRC section 12220(g), timberland (as defined in PRC Section 4526), or timberland zoned  Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 4526) by the Anaheim or Orange Zoning  Codes.  No impacts associated with forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned as Timberland Production  would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No increase in significant impacts has resulted.    d) Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non- forest use?   Previous Significance Determination:  Since the Anaheim City Council certified SEIR No. 339, OPR has  revised the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G to include new forestry resources thresholds.  Accordingly, this  Addendum has conducted the review presented below.       3  California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, Orange County Important  Farmland 2012, January 2015.  4  California Department of Conservation, Agricultural Preserves 2004 (Williamson Act Parcels Orange County,  California), 2004.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-9 Environmental Analysis Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to Response 3.2 (c) above.  Project implementation would not result  in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non‐forest use, and the level of impact would not  increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No increase in significant impacts has resulted.    e) Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 determined that the Platinum  Triangle and its surrounding vicinity do not support agricultural lands.  Because there were no impacts,  this topic was not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.  Since the Anaheim City Council certified SEIR No. 339,  OPR has revised the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G to include new forestry resources thresholds.   Accordingly, this Addendum has conducted the review presented below.      Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to Responses 3.2 (a) and 3.2 (b) above.  Project implementation would  not involve changes in the existing environment which would result in conversion of Farmland to non‐ agricultural use or forestland to non‐forest use, and the level of impact would not increase from that  identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No increase in significant impacts has resulted.    3.2.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Since the Anaheim City Council certified SEIR No. 332 and SEIR No. 339, the State of California has revised  the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G to address forest and timberland resources.  Although SEIR No. 332 and  SEIR No. 339 did not evaluate these resources, no such resources are present within the Platinum Triangle  and its surrounding vicinity.  No impacts would occur and no mitigation is required.    Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    SEIR No. 332 does not include mitigation measures for agricultural and forestry resources.      Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 does not include mitigation measures for agricultural and forestry resources.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-10 Environmental Analysis This page intentionally left blank.   SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-11 Environmental Analysis 3.3 AIR QUALITY   Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?  b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?  c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?  d. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?    a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that although PTMLUP buildout could  result in an increase in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and trips in the local area, the PTMLUP would benefit  to the Southern California Association Government (SCAG) region as it would allow for housing  opportunities closer to employment centers.  SEIR No. 339 determined that the PTMLUP would therefore  be consistent with SCAG’s strategies to reduce VMT in the SCAG region and would be consistent with  Southern California Air Quality Management District’s 2007 Air Quality Management Plan (2007 AQMP),  which was the applicable air quality plan at the time.  Impacts concerning conflicting with or obstructing  implementation of the SCAQMD’s 2007 AQMP were identified as less than significant, and no mitigation  was identified.    Project-Specific Analysis:  The Proposed Project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin),  which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).  Pursuant  to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA), the SCAQMD is required to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for  which the Basin is in nonattainment: ozone (O3), coarse particulate matter (PM10), and fine particulate  matter (PM2.5).  These are considered criteria pollutants because they are three of several prevalent air  pollutants known to be hazardous to human health.      Since certification of SEIR No. 339, the SCAQMD has adopted the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016  AQMP) to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the Basin is in nonattainment.  The 2016 AQMP  is a regional and multi‐agency effort including the SCAQMD, the California Air Resources Board (CARB),  SCAG, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish a program of rules and  regulations directed at reducing air pollutant emissions and achieving State (California) and Federal air  quality standards.  The 2016 AQMP pollutant control strategies are based on the latest scientific and  technical information and planning assumptions, including SCAG’s 2016 Regional Transportation  Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), updated emission inventory methodologies for various  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-12 Environmental Analysis source categories, and SCAG’s latest growth forecasts.5  SCAG’s latest growth forecasts were defined in  consultation with local governments and with reference to local general plans.  The Project is subject to  the SCAQMD’s 2016 AQMP.    The Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP is defined by the following indicators:     Consistency Criterion No. 1: The Proposed Project would not result in an increase in the  frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, or cause or contribute to new violations,  or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions  specified in the AQMP.   Consistency Criterion No. 2: The Proposed Project would not exceed the assumptions in the  AQMP based on the years of project buildout phase.    Concerning Consistency Criterion No. 1, the Proposed Project would not involve a change of land use  which would increase the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, or cause or contribute to  new violations, or delay the timey attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions  specified in the 2016 AQMP.  The violations to which Consistency Criterion No. 1 refers are the California  ambient air quality standards (CAAQS) and the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).  The  Proposed Project involves the additional widening of the bridge structure over the Santa Ana River, new  property acquisition in OCFCD right‐of‐way, Santa Ana River Trail realignment, drainage facility relocation  in the Santa Ana River, a water line extension, and reorganization of municipal jurisdiction of land along  the Santa Ana River.  Based on the scope and scale of these improvements, Project implementation would  not exceed the short‐term construction or long‐term operational air quality standards beyond what SEIR  No. 339 evaluated for the Approved Project.  Thus, the Proposed Project would be consistent with  Consistency Criterion No. 1, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No.  339.     Concerning Consistency Criterion No. 2, the 2016 AQMP contains air pollutant reduction strategies and  demonstrates that the applicable ambient air quality standards can be achieved within the periods  required under Federal law.  Growth projections from local general plans adopted by cities in the district  are provided to SCAG, which develops regional growth forecasts that are used to develop future air quality  forecasts for the AQMP.  Development consistent with the growth projections in the Anaheim and Orange  General Plans is considered consistent with the AQMP.    As discussed, Project implementation would accommodate existing and predicted traffic patterns along  Orangewood Avenue.  The Proposed Project’s design accommodates additional traffic volumes; proposed  improvements would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the  roadway.     The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana  River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  The proposed amendments reflect anticipated future development of these areas,  which is similar in intensity to what the General Plan already permits. Currently the General Plan  designates the subject properties for Mixed Use Urban Core and Open Space land use. The proposed    5  SCAQMD is currently working on the next iteration of the AQMP, the 2022 Air Quality Management Plan (2022  AQMP).  The 2022 AQMP will incorporate the recently adopted SCAG’s 2020‐2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable  Communities Strategy (2020‐2045 RTP/SCS).  However, until the adoption of the 2022 AQMP, project AQMP consistency will be  analyzed off the 2016 AQMP and the RTP/SCS that was adopted at the time, the 2016‐2040 RTP/SCS.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-13 Environmental Analysis amendments for Area 1 and 1A would spread the intensities permitted General Plan Mixed‐Use Urban  Core land use designation over a slightly larger area; however, the amendments would not increase the  maximum intensities permitted by the General Plan for the Platinum Triangle. The proposed amendments  for Area 2 would change the land use designation for Open Space to Parks; the General Plan permits both  uses at the same maximum FAR of 0.10. Any future park project would be subject to CEQA. There would  be no change in the General Plan designations for the remainder of the area subject to the reorganization.   Given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐ analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that  identified in SEIR No. 339.    As a roadway improvement and annexation project, Project implementation would not conflict with the  population and employment growth assumptions identified in the 2016 AQMP.  For these reasons, the  Project would be consistent with Consistency Criterion No. 2, and Project implementation would not  conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 2016 AQMP.     Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    b) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 pages 5.2‐17 to  5.2‐19.   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that PTMLUP implementation had the  potential to result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the  project region is in non‐attainment under applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standards.   Despite incorporation of SEIR No. 339 MM 2‐1 through MM 2‐6, SEIR No. 339 found that construction  and operation would generate short‐term and long‐term air pollutants that would exceed SCAQMD’s  regional significance thresholds.  A significant and unavoidable impact was identified, and a Statement of  Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City Council at SEIR No. 339 certification.      Project-Specific Analysis:        Short‐Term Construction    Dust (PM10) is typically a major concern during rough grading activities.  Because such emissions are not  amenable to collection and discharge through a controlled source, they are called “fugitive emissions.”  Fugitive dust emission rates vary as a function of many parameters (e.g., soil silt, soil moisture, wind  speed, area disturbed, number of vehicles, depth of disturbance or excavation).  All development projects  in the Cities of Anaheim and Orange, including the Proposed Project, are subject to SCAQMD rules and  regulations to reduce fugitive dust emissions.     Project construction would be subject to compliance with the City of Orange Grading Ordinance (Orange  Municipal Code Chapter 16.40, Grading Requirements), which incorporates by reference the City of  Orange Manual of Grading.  The City of Orange Grading Ordinance establishes minimum requirements to  regulate excavation, grading, and earthwork construction, which act to reduce impacts concerning fugitive  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-14 Environmental Analysis dust.  In addition to City requirements, all grading operations, land clearing, loading, stockpiling,  landscaping, vehicular track‐out, and haul routes would be subject to compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403,  which is included in SEIR No. 339 as MM 2‐2.  SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) requires fugitive dust  sources to implement best available control measures for all sources, and all forms of visible particulate  matter are prohibited from crossing any property line.  SCAQMD adopted Rule 403 to reduce PM  emissions from any transportation, handling, construction, or storage activity that has the potential to  generate fugitive dust.  MM 2‐2 of SEIR No. 339 includes these PM suppression techniques.    In addition to the City of Orange Grading Ordinance and SEIR No. 339 MM 2‐2 (SCAQMD Rule 403), Project  construction would be subject to SCAQMD Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings); Rule 431.2 (Low Sulfur  Fuel); and Rule 1186/1186.1 (Street Sweepers), among others.  Project construction would also  demonstrate conformance with SEIR No. 339 MM 2‐1 and 2‐3 to reduce construction‐related emissions.   Based on the scope and scale of the Project’s proposed improvements, Project implementation would not  exceed the short‐term construction air quality standards beyond what SEIR No. 339 concluded, following  compliance with the City of Orange Grading Ordinance and relevant SCAQMD Rules.  Thus, the Project’s  construction‐generated criteria pollutant emissions would not exceed their respective thresholds and the  level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Long‐Term Operations    The Project does not include components which would generate permanent stationary (i.e., new  buildings) or new mobile sources of emissions.  Therefore, by its nature, the Project would not generate  quantifiable criteria emissions from long‐term operations.  The proposed roadway widening would  accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands in compliance with SEIR No. 339 MM 2‐5 and would  not directly generate new traffic or increase the numbers of vehicles along the roadway.  The Project’s  pedestrian sidewalks and bicycle lanes would improve non‐motorized transportation options.  As  discussed in Section 3.16, Transportation and Traffic, Project implementation would not impact existing  traffic conditions along Orangewood Avenue.      The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana  River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  The proposed amendments would result in land use that is similar in intensity to  what the General Plan currently permits. Currently the General Plan designates the subject properties for  Mixed‐Use Urban Core and Open Space land use. The proposed amendments for Area 1 and 1A would  spread the intensities permitted General Plan Mixed‐Use Urban Core land use designation over a slightly  larger area; however, the amendments would not increase the maximum intensities permitted by the  General Plan for the Platinum Triangle. The proposed amendments for Area 2 would change the land use  designation for Open Space to Parks; the General Plan permits both uses at the same maximum FAR of  0.10. There would be no change in the General Plan designations for the remainder of the area subject to  the reorganization.   Any future development of any of these sites would be subject to CEQA and analyzed  on a per project basis for short‐term construction and long‐term operational air quality impacts.  Given  that the permitted type and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed  by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR  No. 339.    Thus, the Project would not result in permanent stationary or mobile sources of emissions and the level  of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.       SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-15 Environmental Analysis Cumulative Impacts     Cumulatively considerable projects could contribute to an existing or projected air quality exceedance  since the SCAB is currently in nonattainment for O3 and PM2.5.  The improvements identified in Section  2.0 are not expected to substantially increase the PTMLUP’s short‐term and long‐term air pollutants  identified in SEIR No. 339.  All cumulative development occurring within the Basin would be subject to  compliance with applicable SCAQMD rules and regulations.  As the Project would not involve substantial  changes which would contribute a cumulatively considerable net increase in the region for any non‐ attainment criteria pollutant beyond that identified in SEIR No. 339, the level of impact would not  increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.      c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?   Previous Significance Determination:  Sensitive populations (sensitive receptors) are more  susceptible to air pollution effects than the general population.  Sensitive populations that are in  proximity to localized sources of toxics and CO are of particular concern.  Some land uses are considered  more sensitive to air quality changes than others, depending on the population groups and the activities  involved.  CARB identifies the following types of people as most likely to be adversely affected by air  pollution:  children under 14; elderly over 65; athletes; and, people with cardiovascular and chronic  respiratory diseases.  Locations with potential to contain a high concentration of these sensitive  population groups are called sensitive receptors and include residential areas, hospitals, day‐care  facilities, elder‐care facilities, places of worship, elementary schools, and parks.      SEIR No. 339 concluded that PTMLUP implementation could expose sensitive receptors to substantial  pollutant concentrations.  Despite implementation of MM 2‐1 through 2‐9, SEIR No. 339 found that: (1)  construction activities would potentially expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant  concentrations of NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5; and (2) sensitive land uses within 500 feet of SR‐57 and I‐5,  or within the recommended buffer distances to facilities emitting TACs, may be exposed to substantial  pollutant concentrations.  Impacts were determined to remain significant and unavoidable, and a  Statement of Overriding considerations was adopted by the City Council when SEIR No. 339 was certified.      Project-Specific Analysis:  Sensitive receptors within 500 feet of the Project area include a surgical  center (Orangewood Surgical Center) and residential uses to the north and south of the Project Site,  respectfully.       The Proposed Project involves the additional widening of the bridge structure over the Santa Ana River,  new property acquisition in OCFCD right‐of‐way, Santa Ana River Trail realignment, drainage facility  relocation in the Santa Ana River, a water line extension, and annexation of land along the Santa Ana  River.  Construction activities would involve incidental amounts of toxic substances such as oils, solvents,  paints, adhesives, and coatings.  The use and application of these substances would comply with all  applicable SCAQMD rules for their use, storage, and disposal.  The SCAQMD has established that impacts  to air quality are significant if there is a potential to contribute or cause localized exceedances of the  Federal and/or State ambient air quality standards (NAAQS/CAAQS).  Collectively, these are referred to as  localized significance thresholds (LSTs).  Based on the scope and scale of these improvements, it is not  anticipated that Project construction would involve LST construction impacts greater than those identified  in SEIR No. 339.  In accordance with SEIR No. 339 MM 2‐2, Project construction would also demonstrate  compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 to reduce impacts to nearby sensitive receptors.  In addition, the  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-16 Environmental Analysis Project would demonstrate compliance with SEIR No. 339 MM 2‐1 and MM 2‐3 to reduce onsite and  export‐related construction emissions.  Compliance with SEIR No. 339 MM 2‐1 through 2‐3 would reduce  LST construction impacts to a less than significant level.     The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana  River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  The proposed amendments would result in land use that is similar in intensity to  what the General Plan currently permits. Currently the General Plan designates the subject properties for  Mixed‐Use Urban Core and Open Space land use. The proposed amendments for Area 1 and 1A would  spread the intensities permitted General Plan Mixed‐Use Urban Core land use designation over a slightly  larger area; however, the amendments would not increase the maximum intensities permitted by the  General Plan for the Platinum Triangle. The proposed amendments for Area 2 would change the land use  designation for Open Space to Parks; the General Plan permits both uses at the same maximum FAR of  0.10. There would be no change in the General Plan designations for the remainder of the area subject to  the reorganization.   Any future development of any of these sites would be subject to CEQA. Given that  the permitted type and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by  SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR  No. 339.    Therefore, sensitive receptors would not be subject to a significant air quality impact during construction  and level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Carbon Monoxide Hotspots    CO emissions are a function of vehicle idling time, meteorological conditions, and traffic flow.  Under  certain extreme meteorological conditions, CO concentrations near a congested roadway or intersection  may reach unhealthful levels (i.e., adversely affecting residents, schoolchildren, hospital patients, the  elderly, etc.).  The SCAQMD requires a quantified assessment of CO hotspots when a Project increases the  volume‐to‐capacity ratio (also called the intersection capacity utilization [ICU]) by 0.02 (two percent) for  any intersection with an existing level of service LOS D or worse.  Because traffic congestion is highest at  intersections, where vehicles queue and are subject to reduced speeds, these hot spots are typically  produced at intersections.      The Project involves widening Orangewood Avenue and related improvements and would not generate  new vehicle trips beyond those identified in SEIR No. 339; refer to Section 3.17.  In compliance with SEIR  No. 339 MM 2‐5, Project implementation would reduce congestion and improve traffic flow along  Orangewood Avenue.   The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP  associated with the Santa Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas,  but not a specific development project.  The proposed amendments would result in land use that is similar  in intensity to what the General Plan currently permits. Currently the General Plan designates the subject  properties for Mixed‐Use Urban Core and Open Space land use. The proposed amendments for Area 1  and 1A would spread the intensities permitted General Plan Mixed‐Use Urban Core land use designation  over a slightly larger area; however, the amendments would not increase the maximum intensities  permitted by the General Plan for the Platinum Triangle. The proposed amendments for Area 2 would  change the land use designation for Open Space to Parks; the General Plan permits both uses at the same  maximum FAR of 0.10. There would be no change in the General Plan designations for the remainder of  the area subject to the reorganization.   Any future development of any of these sites would be subject to  CEQA and analyzed on a per project basis for short‐term construction and long‐term operational air  quality impacts. Given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be similar to what was  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-17 Environmental Analysis previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from  that identified in SEIR No. 339. Thus, the Proposed Project would not increase the ICU or nearby  intersections to warrant a CO hotspot analysis.  Impacts would be less than significant and the level of  impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    d) Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 on page 5.2‐27.   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that PTMLUP buildout would involve  less than significant impacts concerning objectionable odors with the incorporation of SEIR No. 339 MM  2‐10.  MM 2‐10 applies to projects located within 1,000 feet of an industrial facility that emits substantial  odors (e.g., wastewater treatment plants, food processing facilities, coffee roasters).      Project-Specific Analysis:  Land uses generally associated with odor complaints include agricultural  uses (livestock and farming), wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants,  composting operations, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding facilities.  The Project involves  roadway improvements and does not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable  odors. Potential odor sources associated with Project implementation may result from construction  equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt during construction activities.   However, standard  construction requirements would minimize odor impacts from construction.  Construction odor  emissions would be intermittent in nature over a temporary period, would disperse rapidly, would not  affect a substantial number of people, and would cease upon completion of the respective phase of  construction.  Additionally, construction activities would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402  to prevent occurrences of public nuisances.  As a roadway infrastructure and annexation project, Project  implementation would not create objectionable odors and MM 2‐10 is not required.      The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana  River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  The proposed amendments would result in land use that is similar in intensity to  what the General Plan currently permits. Currently the General Plan designates the subject properties for  Mixed‐Use Urban Core and Open Space land use. The proposed amendments for Area 1 and 1A would  spread the intensities permitted General Plan Mixed‐Use Urban Core land use designation over a slightly  larger area; however, the amendments would not increase the maximum intensities permitted by the  General Plan for the Platinum Triangle. The proposed amendments for Area 2 would change the land use  designation for Open Space to Parks; the General Plan permits both uses at the same maximum FAR of  0.10. There would be no change in the General Plan designations for the remainder of the area subject  to the reorganization.  Any future development of any of these sites would be subject to CEQA and  analyzed on a per project basis.   Given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be  similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would  not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-18 Environmental Analysis For the above reasons, the Project’s potential construction‐related and operational odor impacts are  considered less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR  No. 339.      Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    3.3.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    Refer to the Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339 below, which are based on adopted Mitigation  Measures from SEIR No. 332.     Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated development and infrastructure  improvements within the Platinum Triangle.  The following measures from SEIR No. 339 are applicable to  the Proposed Project.6 Any modifications to the original measures are shown in strikethrough for deleted  text and new, inserted text is underlined.    MM 2‐1 Ongoing during grading and construction, the property owner/developer City shall be  responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to reduce  construction‐related emissions; however, the resultant value is expected to remain  significant.    a. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced  and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations to reduce  operational emissions.    b. The contractor shall use Tier 3 or higher, as identified by the United States  Environmental Protection Agency, off‐road construction equipment with higher air  pollutant emissions standards for equipment greater than 50 horsepower, based on  manufacturer’s availability.    c. The contractor shall utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean‐fuel  generators rather than temporary diesel‐power generators, where feasible.    MM 2‐2 Ongoing during grading and construction, the property owner/developer City shall implement  the following measures in addition to the existing requirements for fugitive dust control under  South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 to further reduce PM10 and PM2.5  emissions.  To assure compliance, the City shall verify compliance that these measures have  been implemented during normal construction site inspections.  The measures to be  implemented are listed below:    a. During all grading activities, the property owner/developer City’s construction  contractor shall re‐establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding    6 Mitigation measure numbering corresponds to Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan Appendix C, Updated and  Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program Number 106C.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-19 Environmental Analysis and watering as quickly as possible to achieve a minimum control efficiency for PM10  of 5 percent.    b. During all grading activities, the property owner/developer City’s construction  contractor shall apply chemical soil stabilizers to on‐site haul roads to achieve a  control efficiency for PM10 of 85 percent compared to travel on unpaved, untreated  roads.    c. The property owner/developer City’s construction contractor shall phase grading to  prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time.    d. The property owner/developer City’s construction contractor shall schedule activities  to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work  periods.    e. During all construction activities, the property owner/developer City’s construction  contractor shall sweep streets with Rule 1186‐compliant PM10‐efficient vacuum units  on a daily basis if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a  result of hauling.    f. During active demolition and debris removal and grading, the property  owner/developer City’s construction contractor shall suspend demolition and grading  operations when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to achieve an emissions  control efficiency for PM10 under worst‐case wind conditions of 98 percent.    g. During all construction activities, the property owner/developer City’s construction  contractor shall maintain a minimum 12‐inch freeboard ratio on haul trucks hauling  dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials and tarp materials with a fabric cover or other  suitable means to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 91 percent.    h. During all construction activities, the property owner/developer City’s construction  contractor shall water exposed ground surfaces and disturbed areas a minimum of  every three hours on the construction site to achieve an emissions reduction control  efficiency for PM10 of 61 percent.    i. During active demolition and debris removal, the property owner/developer City’s  construction contractor shall apply water to disturbed soils at the end of each day to  achieve an emission control efficiency for PM10 of 10 percent.    j. During scraper unloading and loading, the property owner/developer City’s  construction contractor shall ensure that actively disturbed areas maintain a  minimum soil moisture content of 12 percent by use of a moveable sprinkler system  or water truck to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 69 percent.    k. During all construction activities, the property owner/developer City’s construction  contractor shall limit on‐site vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to no more than 15  miles per hour to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 57 percent.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-20 Environmental Analysis MM 2‐3 Prior to approval of each grading plan (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of  demolition permits (for Demolition Plans), the property owner/developer City shall submit  Demolition and Import/Export Plans detailing construction and demolition (C&D) recycling  and waste reduction measures to be implemented to recover C&D materials.  These plans  shall include identification of off‐site locations for materials export from the project and  options for disposal of excess material.  These options may include recycling of materials on‐ site or to an adjacent site, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity  or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within  Orange County.  The property owner/developer City shall offer recyclable building  materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies  for use in construction of other projects if not all can be reused at the project siteProject  Site.    MM 2‐5 In accordance with the timing required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager during  the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate phase, but no later than prior to the first final Building  and Zoning inspection, the Cityproperty owner/developer shall implement the following  measures to reduce long‐term operational CO, NOX, ROG, and PM10 emissions: (5.2‐5)     Traffic lane improvements and signalization as outlined in the Revised Platinum  Triangle Expansion Project Traffic Study Report by Parsons Brinkerhoff, August 2010,  and Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) shall be implemented as required by  the Traffic and Transportation Manager.     The property owner/developer City shall place bus benches and/or shelters as  required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager at locations along any site  frontage routes as needed.     SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-21 Environmental Analysis 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES   Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?  b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?  c. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?  d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?  e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?  f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?    This section is primarily based on the Results of a Biological Resources Assessment for the Orangewood  Avenue Bridge Widening Over Santa Ana River in the City of Orange, California (Biological Resources  Assessment) and Jurisdictional Delineation for the Orangewood Avenue Bridge Widening Over Santa Ana  River in the City of Orange, California (Jurisdictional Delineation) prepared by Michael Baker International,  dated September 28, 2017 and January 22, 2018, respectively; refer to Appendix A, Biological Resources  Assessment, and Appendix B, Jurisdictional Delineation.   a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that no native  biological resources exist within the Platinum Triangle due to the site’s developed and disturbed nature.   The Initial Study found that buildout of the PTMLUP would not impact candidate, sensitive, or special‐ status species and no mitigation was necessary.  Because there were no impacts, these resources were  not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-22 Environmental Analysis   Project-Specific Analysis:   A Biological Resources Assessment was prepared for the Proposed Project  and included a habitat assessment to survey existing biological conditions on and surrounding the Project  Site.  In addition to the habitat assessment, the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) was queried  for reported locations of listed and special‐status plant and wildlife species as well as special‐status  vegetation communities near the Project Site; refer to Appendix A.  A search of published records of these  species was conducted within this quadrangle using the CNDDB Rarefind5 online software.  The California  Native Plant Society (CNPS) Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants supplied information regarding the  distribution and habitats of plants in the Project vicinity.  The habitat assessment evaluated the ability of  the plant communities found on‐site to provide suitable habitat for relevant special‐status plant and  wildlife species.    Special‐Status Plant Species.  No special‐status plant species were observed on‐site during the habitat  assessment.  Based on the records search, a total of four special‐status plant species have been recorded  within the vicinity of the Project by the CNDDB and CNPS Online Inventory.  However, most of these  species have a low potential or are not expected to occur on‐site due to a lack of suitable habitat to  support them.  No impact would occur in this regard.     Special‐Status Wildlife Species.  No special‐status wildlife species were observed on‐site during the  habitat assessment.  Based on the records search, a total of 18 special‐status wildlife species have been  recorded within the vicinity of the Project by the CNDDB.  However, most of these species have a low  potential or are not expected to occur on‐site due to a lack of suitable habitat to support them.  No impact  would occur in this regard.     Special‐Status Plant Communities.  No special‐status plant communities were observed on‐site during  the habitat assessment.  Based on the results of the habitat assessment, no special‐status plan  communities occur within the Project area.  No impact would occur in this regard.     U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Critical Habitat.  No critical habitat has been mapped by the  USFWS within or adjacent to the Project Site.  Since the Proposed Project would not result in the loss or  adverse modification to Critical Habitat, consultation with the USFWS under Section 7 of the Federal  Endangered Species Act (FESA) would not be required and no impact would occur in this regard.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the Platinum  Triangle does not contain riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities; thus, PTMLUP buildout  would not impact riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities and no mitigation was  necessary.  Because there were no impacts, these resources were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  A Jurisdictional Delineation was prepared for the Proposed Project and  included a site visit to delineate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality  Control Board (Santa Ana RWQCB), and California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (CDFW) jurisdictional  authority located within the Project Site; refer to Appendix B.  Based on the Jurisdictional Delineation, the  Proposed Project would result in 0.03‐acre of permanent impacts and 1.12 acres of temporary impacts to  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-23 Environmental Analysis CDFW un‐vegetated streambed.  As a result, Project implementation would require the following State  and Federal permits: Corps Section 408 Permit and Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14 Linear  Transportation Projects, Regional Board Section 401 Water Quality Certification, and CDFW 1602  Streambed Alteration Agreement.  Following approval of the required State and Federal permits, no  impacts to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities would occur, and the level of impact  would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on State or Federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339  Appendix A, Notice  of Preparation and Initial Study.   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the Platinum  Triangle does not contain wetlands; thus, PTMLUP buildout would not impact federally protect wetlands  and no mitigation was necessary.  Because there were no impacts, these resources were not further  analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  No substantial change from previous analysis.  According to the Jurisdictional  Delineation, the Project Site does not support wetland features; refer to Appendix B.  Therefore, no  impacts associated with federally protected wetlands would occur, and the level of impact would not  increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the Platinum  Triangle does not contain areas associated with wildlife corridors or nursery sites; thus, PTMLUP buildout  would not impact migratory wildlife corridors and native wildlife nursery sites and no mitigation was  necessary.  Because there were no impacts, these resources were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  No substantial change from previous analysis.  Due to the highly disturbed  nature of the Project Site and surrounding areas, the Project Site does not currently function as a  migratory corridor or linkage.  In addition, the Santa Ana River is sand‐bottomed, regularly maintained,  and devoid of vegetation communities and does not function as a migratory corridor or linkage.  The  extensive amount of existing urban development along with the existing roadways, including Orangewood  Avenue, Gene Autry Way, and State College Boulevard, creates a highly fragmented, noncontiguous  landscape that is not conducive to substantial wildlife movement.  Therefore, no impacts associated with  wildlife movement corridors or nursery sites would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from  those levels identified in SEIR No. 339.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-24 Environmental Analysis Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the Platinum  Triangle area was not subject to a tree preservation ordinance or other local regulation protecting  biological resources; thus, PTMLUP buildout would not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting  biological resources and no mitigation was necessary.  Because there were no impacts, this topic not  further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  Pursuant to Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 11.12, Designation of  Landmark Trees, the Anaheim City Council has the authority to designate any tree on public property as a  landmark tree.  Anaheim Municipal Code Section 13.12.080, Interference with Street Trees – Permission  Required, states that no person shall remove a street tree without the written permission of the Anaheim  Director of Community Services.  Similarly, Orange Municipal Code Section 12.28.020, Permit – Required  for Removal or Planting, states that no person shall plant or remove any tree or shrub within public street  or right‐of‐way without having first obtained a permit from the City.     At the time of this writing, the Proposed Project does not include any tree removal activities.  Further, no  trees in the Project vicinity are designated as landmark trees as defined in Anaheim Municipal Code  Chapter 11.12.  Any tree removal, if deemed necessary, would occur in conformance with Anaheim  Municipal Code Section 13.12.080 and Orange Municipal Code Section 12.28.020.  Thus, the Proposed  Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources.  Therefore,  conformance with City requirements would ensure no impacts associated with local policies or ordinances  would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the Platinum  Triangle is not affected by a habitat conservation plan (HCP), natural community conservation plan  (NCCP), or other adopted local, regional, or State habitat conservation plant; thus, PTMLUP buildout  would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved local, regional, or  State habitat conservation plan and no mitigation was necessary.  Because there were no impacts, these  resources were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  According to the County of Orange (Central/Coastal) NCCP/HCP, the  Platinum Triangle is not affected by the NCCP/HCP conservation plan area.  Thus, Project implementation  would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other adopted local, regional, or State  habitat conservation plan, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-25 Environmental Analysis 3.4.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    SEIR No. 332 does not include mitigation measures for biological resources.    Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 does not include mitigation measures biological resources. SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-26 Environmental Analysis This page intentionally left blank. SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-27 Environmental Analysis 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES   Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5?  b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5?  d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?    a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 in Appendix A,  Notice of Preparation and Initial Study.   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the Platinum  Triangle does not contain any historical resources as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. The  Platinum Triangle is not located within the Anaheim Colony Historic District and none of the structures  within the PTMLUP area were identified on the Qualified Historic Structures list of the Anaheim Colony  Historic District Preservation Plan.  No known historic archaeological sites within the PTMLUP were  identified.  The Initial Study concluded that no impacts would occur and no mitigation was necessary.   Because there were no impacts, these resources were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  Historic resources generally consist of buildings, structures, improvements,  and remnants associated with a significant historic event or person(s) and/or having a historically  significant style, design, or achievement.  Damage to or demolition of such resources is typically a  significant impact.  Impacts to historic resources can occur through direct impacts, such as destruction or  removal, and through indirect impacts, such as a change in the setting of a historic resource.  According  to SEIR No. 339 Addendum No. 7, 13 National Register of Historic Places‐listed properties are located  within the City of Anaheim.  According to Orange General Plan EIR Figure 5.5‐1 (Designated Historic  Resources), 11 NRHP‐designated resources are located within the City of Orange.      The Project Site encompasses an approximately half‐mile long segment of Orangewood Avenue and the  Santa Ana River reorganizational area.  Based on SEIR No. 339 Addendum No. 7 and Orange General Plan  EIR Figure 5.5‐1, no known historic resources are located within or directly adjacent to the Proposed  Project.  Thus, Project implementation would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance  of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064, and the level of impact would not increase from that  identified in SEIR No. 339.      Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-28 Environmental Analysis b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the PTMLUP  area does not contain any known archaeological resources since the Platinum Triangle area has already  been disturbed and the potential for subsurface resource is remote.  There are no known  prehistoric/historic archaeological sites located within the PTMLUP area.  No impact to pre‐historic or  historic archaeological resources were identified and no mitigation was required.  Because there were no  impacts, these resources were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  Archaeological sites are locations that contain resources associated with  former human activities and may contain such resources as human skeletal remains, waste from tool  manufacture, tool concentrations, and/or discoloration or accumulation of soil or food remains.  As  concluded in SEIR No. 339 and its subsequent addendums, no pre‐historic or historic archaeological  resources have been identified in the PTMLUP area.  The Project would occur along a fully‐improved  segment of Orangewood Avenue surrounded by developed uses.  In addition, the Project’s proposed  Santa Ana River Trail improvements would occur within a heavily disturbed segment of the River that has  been subject to channelization and frequent human use.  Thus, Project‐related ground disturbing activities  would have a remote potential to uncover previously‐unknown buried resources.  Further, the proposed  amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River  reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific development  project. Any future development would be subject to CEQA and analyzed on a per project basis.  Given  that the permitted type and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed  by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR  No. 339.    Nonetheless, in compliance with 14 CCR Section 15064.5, if Project construction results in the inadvertent  discovery of subsurface archaeological resources, all construction activities within 100 feet of the find  would immediately halt until a qualified archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior’s  Professional Qualification Standards for Archaeology evaluates the significance of the find and determines  whether additional study is warranted.  Depending on the significance of the find, the archaeologist may  simply record the find and allow work to continue.  If the discovery proves significant under CEQA,  additional work, such as preparation of an archaeological treatment plan, testing, or data recovery, may  be warranted.  Compliance with existing State regulatory requirements would ensure impacts concerning  archaeological resources are less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from that  identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    c) Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 determined that the Platinum  Triangle does not contain human remains, including those outside of formal cemeteries since the PTMLUP  area has already been disturbed and the potential for any subsurface cultural resources is remote.  The  Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 determined that the PTMLUP would have no impact to human remains and  no mitigation was necessary.  Because there were no impacts, these resources were not further analyzed  in SEIR No. 339.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-29 Environmental Analysis Project-Specific Analysis:  Consistent with the findings of the Initial Study for SEIR No. 339, it is not  anticipated that human remains or informal cemetery areas are present on the Project Site; however, all  ground‐disturbing activities, such as grading or excavation have the potential to inadvertently disturb  human remains.  If human remains are found, those remains would require proper treatment in  accordance with applicable laws.  PRC Section 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code Sections 7050.5–7055  describe the general provisions regarding human remains, including the requirements if any human  remains are accidentally discovered during Project construction.    As required by State law, procedures set forth in PRC Section 5097.98 would be implemented, including  notification of the County Coroner, notification of the Native American Heritage Commission, and  consultation with the individual identified by the Native American Heritage Commission to be the “most  likely descendant.” Compliance with existing State regulations, which detail the appropriate actions  necessary in the unlikely event that human remains are uncovered, would ensure that Project  implementation does not impact human remains, and the level of impact would not increase from that  identified in SEIR No. 339.    3.5.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    SEIR No. 332 does not include mitigation measures for cultural resources.    Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 does not include mitigation measures for cultural resources.     SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-30 Environmental Analysis This page intentionally left blank.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-31 Environmental Analysis 3.6 ENERGY The previously certified SEIR No. 339 did not evaluate energy as it was not required in the CEQA Guidelines  at the time SEIR No. 339 was prepared.    On October 26, 2010, the City of Anaheim certified the SEIR No. 339 that analyzed the potential impacts  associated with development of the revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project.  Although this previous  environmental document did not include an energy analysis, a supplemental environmental analysis of  energy impacts cannot be required absent new information on that front.  The implementation of project  design features and mitigation measures related to energy efficiency have typically been incorporated  into a project’s air quality analysis.  Additionally, Public Resources Code Section 21100(b)(3) and CEQA  Guidelines Section 15126.4 require EIRs to describe, where relevant, the wasteful, inefficient, and  unnecessary consumption of energy caused by a project.  Thus, the effect of energy usage could have  been raised in 2010 when the City considered the EIR.  A challenge to an EIR must be brought within 30  days of the lead agency’s notice of approval.  (Pub. Resources Code, § 21167[b].)  Under Public Resources  Code Section 21166(c), an agency may not require a supplemental environmental review unless new  information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the EIR was approved,  becomes available.  After a project has been subjected to environmental review, the statutory  presumption flips in favor of the project proponent and against further review.  (Moss v. County of  Humboldt [2008] 162 Cal.App.4th 1041, 1049‐1050.)  “‘[S]ection 21166 comes into play precisely because  in‐depth review has already occurred [and] the time for challenging the sufficiency of the original EIR has  long since expired.’”  (Id., 1050.)  There is no competent evidence of new information of severe impact,  and thus the City may rely on an addendum.  Accordingly, the City finds that energy is not “new  information” under Public Resources Code Section 21166.    Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation?  b. Conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?    a) Would the project result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation?   Previous Significance Determination:  As detailed in SEIR No. 339, Project implementation would be  required to comply with mandated energy efficiency programs and regulations the California Building  Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24) of the California Building Code (CBC).  Future development of  structures would be required to submit energy calculations that demonstrate each new structure exceeds  Title 24 standards by 10 percent (SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measure 2‐6 and SEIR No. 332 Mitigation  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-32 Environmental Analysis Measure 10‐21) and would be subject to several specified Title 24 energy saving practices (SEIR No. 332  Mitigation Measure 10‐22).       Project-Specific Analysis:  The Project would not result in an increase in construction‐related or  operational energy demand beyond that anticipated for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project.   As a roadway widening and annexation project, the Project does not propose habitable structures and is  limited to widening an existing segment of Orangewood Avenue and associated utility infrastructure  improvements.  These types of improvements would not have the potential to result in a significant  environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources  during Project operation.  SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measure 2‐6 and SEIR No. 332 Mitigation Measures 10‐ 21 and 10‐22 would not apply to the Proposed Project in this regard.  Project lighting would be similar to  existing lighting sources along Orangewood Avenue and would be subject to the applicable energy  efficiency programs and regulations detailed above.  The proposed amendments to the General Plan,  Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future  development of these areas, but not a specific development project.  Any future development would be  subject to CEQA and analyzed on a per project basis. Given that the permitted type and intensity of  development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that  the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. Thus, the Proposed Project  would not result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or  unnecessary consumption of energy resources during Project construction or operation and a less than  significant impact would occur.  As noted above, the City has determined that energy does not constitute  new significant information under Public Resources Code Section 21166.    Significance Determination:  No increase in significant impacts has resulted.    b) Would the project conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 determined that the Project would be required to  comply with the California Building Energy Efficiency Standards of the CBC.  In addition, mitigation  measures were included in ensure structural development exceeds Title 24 standards by 10 percent and  is subject to Title 24 energy saving practices (SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measure 2‐6 and SEIR No. 332  Mitigation Measures 10‐21 and 10‐22).     Project-Specific Analysis:  As discussed, the Project would be required to comply with all applicable  energy efficiency programs and regulations.  Impacts in this regard would be less than significant. As a  roadway improvement and annexation project, the Project would not be subject to SEIR No. 339  Mitigation Measure 2‐6 and SEIR No. 332 Mitigation Measures 10‐21 and 10‐22.  As noted above, the City  has determined that energy does not constitute new information under Public Resources Code Section  21166.    Significance Determination:  No increase in significant impacts has resulted.    3.6.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    SEIR No. 332 mitigation measures are not applicable to the Proposed Project.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-33 Environmental Analysis Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 mitigation measures are not applicable to the Proposed Project.     SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-34 Environmental Analysis This page intentionally left blank.      SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-35 Environmental Analysis 3.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS   Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.  2) Strong seismic ground shaking?  3) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?  4) Landslides?  b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?  c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?  d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1- B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?  e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?  f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?    a) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 Appendix A.    i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the PTMLUP  area is not underlain by Alquist‐Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone; thus, PLMLUP buildout would not involve  impacts associated with earthquake fault rupture and no mitigation was necessary.  Because there were  no impacts, these impacts were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-36 Environmental Analysis Project-Specific Analysis:  The Project Site, like the rest of Southern California, is situated within a  seismically active region as the result of being located near the active margin between the North American  and Pacific tectonic plates.  However, the Project Site is not located within an Alquist‐Priolo Earthquake  Fault Zone.7  Further, no known or potentially active faults traverse the Project Site.  As indicated in SEIR  No. 339 Addendum No. 7, the El Modeno and Peralta Hill faults are the closest active faults to the Project  Site, which are located approximately three miles to the northeast.     As a roadway widening project, the Proposed Project does not propose habitable structures and is limited  to widening an existing segment of Orangewood Avenue and associated utility infrastructure  improvements.  These types of improvements are not particularly at‐risk to earthquake‐induced damage;  thus, Project implementation would not increase the risk of loss, injury, or death associated with fault  rupture.  The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the  Santa Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  Any future development would be subject to CEQA and analyzed on a per project  basis.  Given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be similar to what was  previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from  that identified in SEIR No. 339. Therefore, no impacts associated with fault rupture would result, and the  level of impact from the Proposed Project would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the PTMLUP  area may be exposed to impacts from earthquakes, including strong seismic ground shaking; thus, impacts  associated with strong seismic ground shaking would be less than significant.  Because there were less  than significant impacts, these impacts were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:      As indicated in Response 3.6 (a)(i), the El Modeno and Peralta Hill faults are in proximity to the Proposed  Project, both of which have the potential to induce strong seismic ground shaking.  The Project’s design,  engineering, and installation would be subject to all applicable seismic design requirements in place to  protect infrastructure from the effects of seismic ground shaking.  As described above, the proposed  roadway improvements do not involve the construction of habitable structures, and its implementation  would not increase the potential for human injury, loss, or death.  The proposed amendments to the  General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River reorganization reflect  anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific development project. Any future  development would be subject to CEQA and analyzed on a per project basis. Given that the permitted  type and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one  can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. For these  reasons, impacts concerning strong seismic ground shaking would be less than significant, and the level  of impact associated with the Proposed Project would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.      7 California Department of Conservation, Seismic Hazard Zone Map for the Anaheim Quadrangle, Released April 15,  1998.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-37 Environmental Analysis iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that impacts associated with seismic‐ related ground failure, including liquefaction would be less than significant following conformance with  required codes and SEIR No. 332 MM 5.3‐1 through MM 5.3‐6.  Because there were less than significant  impacts, these impacts were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  According to the Orange General Plan Figure 5.6‐2 (Environmental and  Natural Hazard Policy Map), portions of the Project Site generally east of the Orangewood Avenue/SR‐57  Interchange are prone to liquefaction.  Due to the nature of the Project’s proposed improvements,  settlement as the result of liquefaction following a seismic event would likely be minimal.  Nonetheless,  placement and compaction of fill would be subject to conformance with the City of Anaheim and City of  Orange Grading Standards to the satisfaction of a qualified geotechnical engineer (soil engineer) in  addition to SEIR No. 332 MM 5.3‐1 through MM 5.3‐4 and MM 5.3‐6.  SEIR No. 332 MM 5.3‐5 pertain to  habitable structures and thus is not applicable to the Proposed Project.  The roadway improvements  would not significantly expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the  risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic‐related ground failure. The proposed amendments to the  General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River reorganization reflect  anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific development project. Any future  development would be subject to CEQA and analyzed on a per project basis.  Given that the permitted  type and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one  can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. Impacts  concerning seismic‐related ground failure would be less than significant following conformance with SEIR  No. 332 MM 5.3‐1 through MM 5.3‐4 and MM 5.3‐6, and the level of impact for the Proposed Project  would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.     Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    iv) Landslides? Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for the SEIR No. 339 concluded that the  PTMLUP area does not contain any major slopes on or in the immediate vicinity which would represent a  landslide hazard; thus, PTMLUP buildout would not involve impacts associated with landslides and no  mitigation was necessary.  Because there were no impacts, these resources were not further analyzed in  SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:      According to the Orange General Plan Figure 5.6‐2, the Project Site is not located within an area  susceptible to seismically‐induced landslides.  Therefore, no impacts associated with landslides would  occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded soils within the  PTMLUP have a slight erosion potential, but buildout would involve less than significant impacts  concerning substantial soil erosion and loss of topsoil following conformance with existing regulatory  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-38 Environmental Analysis requirements for erosion control.  In addition, development projects involving one or more acres would  require compliance with a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and  implementation of a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) during construction for erosion  control.  Adherence to existing regulatory requirements would reduce erosion impacts to less than  significant.  Because there were less than significant impacts, these impacts were not further analyzed in  SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:     Soil erosion is most prevalent in unconsolidated alluvium and surficial soils and in areas that have slopes.   According to SEIR No. 339, the Project area includes soils with slight erosion potential.  The proposed  roadway improvements would occur along a generally flat segment of Orangewood Avenue where the  potential for soil erosion would be minimal.  However, construction activities occurring within the Santa  Ana River associated with the roadway widening would displace topsoils and temporarily increase the  potential for displaced soils to be subject to wind and water erosion.     To reduce the Project’s potential to result in loss of topsoil, the Project would be required to meet the  grading standards identified by the City of Anaheim and City of Orange, as applicable.  Further, in  accordance with NPDES requirements, Project implementation would require preparation of a SWPPP for  approval prior to grading activities.  The SWPPP would include site‐specific best management practices  (BMPs) to be implemented with the Project to prevent erosion, minimize siltation from impacting  downstream water bodies, and protect water quality. All grading operations, land clearing, loading,  stockpiling, landscaping, and construction haul routes would also be subject to SCAQMD Rule 403, Fugitive  Dust Emissions, as required by SEIR No. 339 MM 2‐2.  Compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403, as well as  preparation of a SWPPP would reduce the potential for on‐site and off‐site erosion impacts.  The proposed  amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River  reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific development  project.  Any future development would be subject to CEQA and analyzed on a per project basis. Given  that the permitted type and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed  by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR  No. 339. Therefore, impacts associated with erosion would be less than significant, and the level of impact  for the Proposed Project would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that impacts  associated with a geologic unit or soil that is unstable to be less than significant.  Because there were less  than significant impacts, these impacts were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  According to the SEIR No. 339, the near‐surface soils in the Platinum Triangle  area are generally medium‐dense, fine, and fine‐to‐medium‐dense sand with occasional traces of gravel  and infrequent seams of silt.  The expansion potential for these soils is considered low.  These soils are  part of hydrologic group A, which exhibits high infiltration properties.  The Orange General Plan EIR does  not identify the Project Site as located within an area subject to landslide hazards; refer also to Response  3.6 (a) (IV) above.  However, portions of the Project Site east of the Orangewood Avenue/SR‐57  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-39 Environmental Analysis Interchange (generally near the Santa Ana River) are prone to liquefaction according to the Orange  General Plan EIR; refer also to Response 3.6 (a) (III) above.  All Project improvements would be designed  and constructed in conformance with the California Building Standards Code seismic engineering  standards, as well as with City of Anaheim and City of Orange grading standards, as applicable, in addition  to SEIR No. 332 MM 5.3‐1 through MM 5.3‐4 and MM 5.3‐6.  Pursuant to SEIR No. 332 MM 5.3‐1,  development activities within a seismic hazard zone would require preparation of a site‐specific report in  compliance with DMG Special Publication 117, Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards.   Impacts would be less than significant following conformance with SEIR No. 332 MM 5.3‐1 through MM  5.3‐4 and MM 5.3‐6, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. The  proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River  reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific development  project. Any future development would be subject to CEQA and analyzed on a per project basis.  Given  that the permitted type and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed  by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR  No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 Appendix A.   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 indicated that the near‐surface  soils within the PTLMUP are generally medium‐dense, fine and fine‐to‐medium sand with occasional  traces of gravel and infrequent streams of silt.  Based on these characteristics, the expansion potential for  these soils is considered low.   In addition, development projects would require compliance with the  California Building Standards Code and Anaheim Municipal Code Title 17.  Adherence to existing regulatory  requirements would reduce expansive soil impacts to less than significant.  Therefore, this topic was not  further addressed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  Expansive soils are those that undergo volume changes as moisture content  fluctuates, swelling substantially when wet or shrinking when dry.  Soil expansion can damage structures  by cracking foundations, causing settlement, and distorting structural elements.  According to SEIR No.  339 Addendum No. 7, the expansion potential for surface soils within the Project area (primarily medium‐ dense, fine, and fine‐to‐medium sand with occasional traces of gravel and infrequent seams of silt) is  considered low.  As noted previously, the roadway improvements would not significantly expose people  or property to risk of expansive soils. Nonetheless, roadway construction would occur based on the  recommendations of a geotechnical engineer as part of the final design process.  Conformance with such  measures would ensure impacts concerning expansive soils would be less than significant, and the level  of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. The proposed amendments to the  General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River reorganization reflect  anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific development project.  Any future  development would be subject to CEQA and analyzed on a per project basis. Given that the permitted  type and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one  can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. Therefore,  the level of impact for the Proposed Project would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-40 Environmental Analysis   Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for the SEIR No. 339 concluded that the  Platinum Triangle would not use of septic tanks or alternative sewer disposal systems; thus, PTMLUP  buildout would not involve impacts associated with septic tanks or alternative sewer disposal systems and  no mitigation was necessary.  Therefore, this topic was not further addressed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  As a roadway widening project, alternative wastewater disposal systems are  not proposed nor required.  The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP  associated with the Santa Ana River reorganization portion of this project reflect anticipated future  development of these areas, but not a specific development project.  Any future development would be  subject to CEQA and analyzed on a per project basis. Given that the permitted type and intensity of  development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that  the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. Therefore, no impact would  occur, and the level of impact from the Proposed Project would not increase from that identified in SEIR  No. 339.      Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    f) Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the PTMLUP  area has already been disturbed and thus the potential for any subsurface paleontological resources is  remote; thus, PTMLUP buildout would not impact paleontological resources and no mitigation was  necessary.  Because there were no impacts, these resources were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis: The Project site includes a fully‐improved segment of Orangewood Avenue  and area along the Santa Ana River, surrounded by developed uses.  In addition, the Project’s proposed  Santa Ana River Trail improvements would occur within a heavily disturbed segment of the River that has  been subject to channelization and frequent human interference.  As the Project Site is located within a  developed area subject to past disturbance, the potential for the inadvertent discovery of paleontological  resources is considered remote.  The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and  PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River reorganization portion of this project reflect anticipated  future development of these areas, but not a specific development project.  Any future development  would be subject to CEQA and analyzed on a per project basis. Therefore, the Project would not impact  paleontological resources, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.     The Project Site is situated within a developed and urbanized area, and there are no unique geologic  features within the Project vicinity.  Therefore, the Project would not impact unique geologic features,  and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-41 Environmental Analysis 3.7.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    SEIR No. 332 includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated development and infrastructure  improvements within the Platinum Triangle.  The following measures from SEIR No. 332 are applicable to  the Proposed Project.8  Any modifications to the original measures are shown in strikethrough for deleted  text and new, inserted text is underlined.    5.3‐1 Prior to approval of a grading plan, if within a Seismic Hazard Zone, the property  owner/developer City shall submit to the Public Works Department a site‐specific report in  compliance with DMG Special Publication 117, Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating  Seismic Hazards in California.  The report shall be prepared by an engineering geologist and  geotechnical engineer.  All grading shall be in conformance with Title 17 of the Anaheim  Municipal Code.    5.3‐2 During the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate phase Prior to issuance of a building permit, the  property owner/developer City shall submit to the Planning Department, Building  Division,Public Works Department, Development Services Division, for review and approval,  detailed foundation design information for the proposed structuresbuildings, prepared by a  civil engineer, based on recommendations of a geotechnical engineer.    5.3‐3 During the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate phase Prior to issuance of a building permit, the  property owner/developer City shall submit to the Public Works Department, Development  Services Division,Planning Department, Building Division, a report prepared by a geotechnical  engineer for review and approval which shall investigate the subject foundation excavations.    5.3‐4 During the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate phase Prior to issuance of a building permit, the  property owner/developer City shall submit to the Public Works Department, Development  Services Division,Planning Department, Building Division, plans showing that the proposed  structure(s) has been analyzed for earthquake loading and designed according to the most  recent seismic standards in the Uniform Building Code adopted by the City of Anaheim.    5.3‐6 On‐going during grading operations, the property owner/developer City shall implement  standard practices from City Ordinance (Title 17) and policies to the satisfaction of the Public  Works Department, Field Engineering Division.    Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 does not include mitigation measures for geology and soils.    8 Mitigation measure numbering corresponds to the Final Platinum Triangle Subsequent Environmental Impact  Report Appendix A, Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program Number 106A, dated August 2005.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-42 Environmental Analysis This page intentionally left blank. SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-43 Environmental Analysis 3.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS   Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?  b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?      a) Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that PTMLUP buildout had the potential  to generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant  impact on the environment.  Specifically, SEIR No. 339 found that the project evaluated in the SEIR would  generate substantially more GHG emissions compared to the adopted PTMLUP and would cumulatively  contribute to climate change impacts in California.  Mitigation measures from several environmental  sections of SEIR No. 339 were identified to reduce GHG emissions, including:  MM 2‐3, MM 2‐5, MM 2‐6,  MM 9‐1, MM 9‐2, MM 9‐12, MM 9‐14, MM 10‐7, MM 10‐9, MM 10‐12, MM 10‐13, MM 10‐14, MM 10‐ 18, MM 10‐19, MM 10‐20, MM 10‐21, MM 10‐22, and MM 10‐24.  Despite implementation of the  abovementioned mitigation measures, impacts related to GHG emissions were determined to remain  significant and unavoidable, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City  Council when SEIR No. 339 was certified.      Project-Specific Analysis:  Roadway construction would generate GHG emissions, as GHGs would be  emitted through the operation of construction equipment and from worker and vendor vehicles, each of  which typically use fossil‐based fuels to operate.  The combustion of fossil‐based fuels creates GHG  emissions such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O).  Furthermore, CH4 is  emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment.  Despite the Project’s potential to generate construction‐ related GHGs, the changes proposed under this Addendum would not significantly worsen the Project’s  potential to result in direct or indirect construction‐related GHG emissions.  Construction activities would  be similar to those identified under SEIR No. 336 and impacts would be less than significant.     None of the Project components identified in Section 2.3, Proposed Project would represent a new  permanent stationary or mobile sources of GHG emissions.  The Project does not include any new  buildings which would represent a permanent source of stationary or energy source GHG emissions.   Further, once completed, the Project would not result in a permanent increase in traffic; refer to Section  3.17.  Project implementation would accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands associated  with buildout of the PTMLUP and would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of  vehicles along the roadway.  For these reasons, the Project would not generate quantifiable GHG  emissions from long‐term operations and SEIR No. 339 MM 2‐3, MM 2‐5, MM 2‐6, MM 9‐1, MM 9‐2, MM  9‐12, MM 9‐14, MM 10‐7, MM 10‐9, MM 10‐12, MM 10‐13, MM 10‐14, MM 10‐18, MM 10‐19, MM 10‐ SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-44 Environmental Analysis 21, MM 10‐22, and MM 10‐24 are not applicable to the Proposed Project. The Project would demonstrate  conformance with MM‐10‐20, included below, which requires preparation of a Demolition and  Import/Export Plan which identifies offsite locations for materials export and disposal.  Additionally, the  Project improves a non‐motorized transportation option by providing a sidewalk for pedestrians as well  as expanded bicycle facilities.      The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana  River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  The proposed amendments reflect anticipated future development of these areas,  which is similar in intensity to what the General Plan already permits. Currently the General Plan  designates the subject properties for Mixed Use Urban Core and Open Space land use. The proposed  amendments for Area 1 and 1A would spread the intensities permitted General Plan Mixed‐Use Urban  Core land use designation over a slightly larger area; however, the amendments would not increase the  maximum intensities permitted by the General Plan for the Platinum Triangle. The proposed amendments  for Area 2 would change the land use designation for Open Space to Parks; the General Plan permits both  uses at the same maximum FAR of 0.10. There would be no change in the General Plan designations for  the remainder of the area subject to the reorganization.  Any future development of the area subject to  the reorganization would be subject to CEQA and analyzed on a per project basis. Given that the permitted  type and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one  can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Therefore, the Project would not result in new permanent stationary or mobile sources of GHG emissions  and the level of impact from the Project would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that the Platinum Triangle would not  conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for reducing the emissions of GHGs, as the  Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would be consistent with Statewide and regional GHG  reduction goals.  A less than significant impact was identified.      Project-Specific Analysis:  Assembly Bill (AB) 32 is the legal mandate requiring that Statewide GHG  emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020.  In addition, Statewide goals for GHG reductions in the years  beyond 2020 have been recently codified into State law with the passage of Senate Bill (SB) 32.  Signed  into law on September 2016, SB 32 codifies the 2030 target in the recent Executive Order B 30 15 (40  percent below 1990 levels by 2030).  The bill authorizes the State board to adopt an interim GHG emissions  level target to be achieved by 2030.  SB 32 states that the intent is for the Legislature and appropriate  agencies to adopt complementary policies which ensure that the long‐term emissions reductions advance  specified criteria.  However, at the time of writing this Initial Study, no specific policies or emissions  reduction mechanisms have been established.    SCAG’s 2020‐2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy of the Southern  California Association of Governments – Connect SoCal (2020‐2045 RTP/SCS), adopted September 3, 2020,  is a long‐range visioning plan that balances future mobility and housing needs with economic,  environmental, and public health goals.  The 2020‐2045 RTP/SCS embodies a collective vision for the  region’s future and is developed with input from local governments, county transportation commissions,  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-45 Environmental Analysis tribal governments, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and local stakeholders in Imperial, Los Angeles,  Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties.  The 2020‐2045 RTP/SCS is forecast to help  California reach its GHG reduction goals by reducing GHG emissions from passenger cars by eight percent  below 2005 levels by 2020 and 19 percent by 2035 in accordance with the most recent CARB targets  adopted in March 2018.  The 2020‐2045 RTP/SCS contains over 4,000 transportation projects, including  highway improvements, railroad grade separations, bicycle lanes, new transit hubs, and replacement  bridges.  These future investments were included in county plans developed by the six‐county  transportation commissions and seek to reduce traffic bottlenecks, improve the efficiency of the region’s  network, and expand mobility choices.  The 2020‐2045 RTP/SCS is an important planning document for  the region, allowing project sponsors to qualify for Federal funding.  In addition, the 2020‐2045 RTP/SCS  is supported by a combination of transportation and land use strategies that help the region achieve State  GHG emission reduction goals and Federal CAA requirements, preserve open space areas, improve public  health and roadway safety, support the vital goods movement industry, and utilize resources more  efficiently.  The Proposed Project’s consistency with the 2020‐2045 RTP/SCS goals is analyzed in detail in  Table 3.8‐1, Consistency with SCAG’s 2020‐2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities  Strategy Goals.      Table 3.8‐1  Consistency with SCAG’s 2020‐2045 Regional Transportation   Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Goals    SCAG Goals Compliance With Goal Goal 1: Encourage regional economic prosperity and global competitiveness Not Applicable: Due to the nature of the proposed improvements, Goal 1 is not a project-specific goal which would be applicable to the Project. Goal 2: Improve mobility, accessibility, reliability, and travel safety for people and goods Consistent: The Project would widen Orangewood Avenue from a five-lane facility to six lanes and associated bicycle lane/sidewalk to accommodate existing and predicted traffic levels associated with buildout of the PTMLUP. Further, the proposed improvements would follow all applicable safety standards in applicable regulatory documents. Pedestrian walkways and bicycle routes must follow safety precautions and standards established by local (e.g., City of Anaheim and City of Orange) and regional (e.g., SCAG) agencies. Roadways for motorists must follow safety standards established for the local and regional plans. Thus, the Project would improve mobility and accessibility, as well as ensure travel safety and reliability for all people and goods in the region and would be consistent with Goal 2. Goal 3: Enhance the preservation, security, and resilience of the regional transportation system Consistent: Security issues involving roadways and evacuations are addressed in the City of Anaheim and City of Orange’s emergency management plans developed in accordance with State and Federal- mandated emergency management regulations. The Cities of Anaheim and Orange would continue to monitor Orangewood Avenue to determine the adequacy and safety of this roadway segment. Thus, the Project would enhance the preservation, security, and resilience of the transportation system and would be consistent with Goal 3. Goal 4: Increase person and goods movement and travel choices within the transportation system Consistent: The Project would widen Orangewood Avenue from a five-lane facility to six lanes to accommodate existing and predicted traffic levels associated with buildout of the PTMLUP. Additionally, the Project would accommodate bicycle and sidewalk facilities. Thus, Project implementation would increase person and goods movement, as well as travel choices, within the transportation system and the Project would be consistent with Goal 4. SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-46 Environmental Analysis Table 3.8‐1 (continued)  Consistency with SCAG’s 2020‐2045 Regional Transportation   Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Goals    SCAG Goals Compliance With Goal Goal 5: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality Consistent: The Project improves a non-motorized transportation option by providing a sidewalk for pedestrians and expands existing bicycle facilities. Therefore, the Project would encourage non-motorized transportation, reduce GHG emissions, and improve air quality. Thus, the Project would be consistent with Goal 5. Goal 6: Support healthy and equitable communities Consistent: Refer to Response to Goal 5. The Project would support alternative modes of transportation, including walking and bicycling. As a result, the Project would reduce GHG emissions and improve air quality. Therefore, the Project would promote healthy and equitable communities and be consistent with Goal 6. Goal 7: Adapt to a changing climate and support an integrated regional development pattern and transportation network Consistent: The Project would widen Orangewood Avenue from a five-lane facility to six lanes to accommodate existing and predicted traffic levels associated with buildout of the PTMLUP, as well as accommodate bicycle and sidewalk facilities. However, the Project would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the roadway. Therefore, the Project would encourage climate change adaption by reducing GHG emissions and encouraging non-motorized transportation. The Project improvements would support the regional transportation network by accommodating existing and predicted traffic demands. Thus, the Project would be consistent with Goal 7. Goal 8: Leverage new transportation technologies and data-driven solutions that result in more efficient travel Consistent: The Project would support efficient travel by widening Orangewood Avenue to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands. Thus, the Project would be consistent with Goal 8. Goal 9: Encourage development of diverse housing types in areas that are supported by multiple transportation options Not Applicable: Goal 9 focuses on housing supply and therefore does not apply to the proposed roadway improvement and annexation Project. Goal 10: Promote conservation of natural and agricultural lands and restoration of habitats Not Applicable: The Project does not include natural or agricultural lands. Therefore, Goal 10 does not apply to the proposed Project. Source: Southern California Association of Governments, 2025-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy – Connect SoCal, September 3, 2020.   As proposed, the Project would not conflict with the 2020‐2045 RTP/SCS goals.  Thus, the Project would  not conflict with an adopted plan, policy, or regulation pertaining to GHGs.  Further, it is acknowledged  that the proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa  Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  The proposed amendments reflect anticipated future development of these areas,  which is similar in intensity to what the General Plan already permits. Currently the General Plan  designates the subject properties for Mixed Use Urban Core and Open Space land use. The proposed  amendments for Area 1 and 1A would spread the intensities permitted General Plan Mixed‐Use Urban  Core land use designation over a slightly larger area; however, the amendments would not increase the  maximum intensities permitted by the General Plan for the Platinum Triangle. The proposed amendments  for Area 2 would change the land use designation for Open Space to Parks; the General Plan permits both  uses at the same maximum FAR of 0.10. There would be no change in the General Plan designations for  the remainder of the area subject to the reorganization.  Any future development of the area subject to  the reorganization would be subject to CEQA and analyzed on a per project basis. Given that the permitted  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-47 Environmental Analysis type and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one  can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. Therefore,  the Proposed Project would not result in new GHG impacts different from those identified for SEIR No.  339 and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    3.8.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    Refer to the Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339 below, which are based on adopted Mitigation  Measures from SEIR No. 332.     Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated the development and  infrastructure improvements within the Platinum Triangle.  SEIR No. 339 also includes measures related  to air quality, transportation and traffic, and utilities and service systems which would reduce GHG  emissions; refer to Sections 3.3, Air Quality; 3.17; and 3.19, Utilities and Service Systems of this  Addendum.  The following measures from SEIR No. 339 are applicable to the Proposed Project.9  Any  modifications to the original measures are shown in strikethrough for deleted text and new, inserted  text is underlined.  In addition to Air Quality MM 2‐3 and MM 2‐5, described above, the following measure  is applicable to the Proposed Project:    MM 10‐20 Prior to the approval of each grading plan (for import/export plan) and prior to issuance of  demolition permits (for demolition plans), the property owner/developer City shall submit a  Demolition and Import/Export Plans, if determined to be necessary by the Public Works  Department, Traffic Engineering Division and/or Street and Sanitation Division.  The plans shall  include identification of off‐site locations for material export from the project and options for  disposal of excess material.   These options may include recycling of materials on‐site, sale to  a broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally  cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County.   The property  owner/developer City shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for  sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if  all cannot be reused on the project siteProject Site.        9 Mitigation measure numbering corresponds to Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan Appendix C, Updated and  Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program Number 106C.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-48 Environmental Analysis This page intentionally left blank. SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-49 Environmental Analysis 3.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS   Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?  b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?  c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?  d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?  e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?  f. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?  g. Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?    This section is primarily based on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the Orangewood Avenue  Improvements Project located in the Cities of Anaheim and Orange, California (Phase I ESA), prepared by  Michael Baker International, dated October 2017; refer to Appendix C, Phase I Environmental Site  Assessment.   a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that PTMLUP  buildout would allow for the continued operation of businesses that use and store various hazardous  materials.  In addition, the PTMLUP has designated the northern periphery of the PTMLUP area as  industrial.  These areas may handle hazardous materials; however, businesses are required to obtain  permits and maintain records regarding the storage, use and disposal of hazardous material.  The Initial  Study concluded that development of the PTMLUP would not change the existing condition of the project  area and/or increase the use of hazardous materials in the area, and that adhering to the existing  permitting process would ensure that less than significant hazard to the public or the environment occur.   SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-50 Environmental Analysis Because these impacts were considered less than significant, they were not further analyzed in SEIR No.  339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  Roadway construction may involve temporary hazards related to hazardous  materials transport and use, including those used for typical construction activities (i.e., diesel fuel, motor  oil, etc.).  The Project’s construction contractor(s) would be required to uphold standard best  management practices to ensure that all hazardous materials are stored, transported, used, and disposed  of in accordance with Federal and State law.  Conformance with these standards would effectively avoid  and minimize significant hazards related to the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials and  would reduce the Project’s impacts to less than significant levels, and the level of impact would not  increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. Orangewood Avenue would operate consistent with its  existing condition relative to routine transport of hazardous materials.      The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana  River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  The proposed amendments reflect anticipated future development of these areas,  which is similar in intensity to what the General Plan already permits. Currently the General Plan  designates the subject properties for Mixed Use Urban Core and Open Space land use. The proposed  amendments for Area 1 and 1A would spread the intensities permitted General Plan Mixed‐Use Urban  Core land use designation over a slightly larger area; however, the amendments would not increase the  maximum intensities permitted by the General Plan for the Platinum Triangle. The proposed amendments  for Area 2 would change the land use designation for Open Space to Parks; the General Plan permits both  uses at the same maximum FAR of 0.10. There would be no change in the General Plan designations for  the remainder of the area subject to the reorganization.  Any future development of the area subject to  the reorganization would be subject to analysis, pursuant to CEQA, of hazards and hazardous materials  impacts and measures would be proposed to reduce impacts, if required.  However, the amendments do  not involve a land use which would create a significant hazard to the environment due to the routine  transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Given that the permitted type and intensity of  development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that  the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. Thus, Project operations would  not create a hazard related to the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials, and the level of  impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.     Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the Platinum  Triangle would not create a significant hazard to the public or environment due to accidental release of  hazardous materials following conformance with existing Federal and State regulations.  To further reduce  risk of accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment, the Initial Study for SEIR No. 339  recommends implementation of MMP No. 106A MM 5.4‐1 through MM 5.4‐7, prepared for SEIR No 332.   Because these impacts were considered less than significant, they were not further analyzed in SEIR No.  339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to Response 3.8 (a).  Project construction could result in the accidental  release of hazardous substances such as spilling of petroleum‐based fuels, lubricants, and other materials  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-51 Environmental Analysis used for construction equipment.  Use, storage, transport, and disposal of these materials would be  subject to standard construction standards safety procedures and controls that would avoid and minimize  the potential for accidental release of hazardous substances into the environment.  Standard construction  best management practices would be observed such that any hazardous materials released are  appropriately contained and remediated as required by local, State, and Federal law.  Conformance with  these standards would reduce impacts related to the accidental release of hazardous materials into the  environment to less than significant levels, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified  in SEIR No. 339.    In accordance with SEIR No. 332 MM 5.4‐6, Michael Baker prepared a Phase I ESA in conformance with  the scope and limitations of ASTM International (ASTM) E 1527‐13 Standard Practice for Environmental  Site Assessments.  The Phase I ESA evaluated the potential for known hazardous sites in the area to  potentially affect the subject site.    Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) indicates the presence or likely presence of any hazardous  substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: 1) due to release to the environment; 2) under  conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or 3) under conditions that pose a material threat  of a future release to the environment.  De minimis conditions are not considered RECs.       The Phase I ESA identified the following two RECs in connection with the Project Site:     Aerially Deposited Lead: Aerially deposited lead refers to lead deposited on highway shoulders  from past leaded fuel vehicle emissions.  Based on historical aerial photographs and United States  Geological Survey topographic maps, SR‐57 was constructed in 1977.  The potential for lead  contamination to exist within exposed soils on‐site due to aerially deposited lead is likely.  It is  Michael Baker's opinion that there is a REC on the subject site due to aerially deposited lead.     Groundwater Contamination: The adjacent property located at 2023 Collins Street (approximately  2,420 feet up gradient of the Project Site) was found to have groundwater contamination  extending to a maximum distance of 6,500 feet down gradient, which includes the Project Site  and areas of propose right‐of‐way acquisition.  For this reason, it is likely that the Project Site is  underlain by contaminated groundwater.  However, the groundwater is anticipated to be greater  than 80 feet below ground surface; therefore, proposed construction activities are not anticipated  to encounter groundwater.    Aerially Deposited Lead    Ground disturbance activities associated with Project construction activities could subject construction  workers to aerially deposited lead.  However, ground disturbance and spoils removal, transport, and  cleanup procedures would conform to California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)  guidelines.  In compliance with SEIR No. 332 MM 5.4‐1, if aerially deposited lead is discovered during site  preparation or construction, the City of Anaheim would ensure that the identified hazardous waste and/or  hazardous material is handled and disposed of in the manner specified by the State of California  Hazardous Substances Control Law (Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5) and according to  the requirements of the California Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 22.  In addition, the City would  report the finding of hazardous waste to the Orange County Health Care Agency and Anaheim Fire  Department (AFD).  Conformance with these standards would reduce impacts related to aerially deposited  lead to less than significant levels, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR  No. 339.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-52 Environmental Analysis   Groundwater Contamination    Ground disturbance activities associated with Project construction activities could result in the exposure  of construction workers to contaminated groundwater.  If dewatering discharge is piped to storm drains,  the requirements of the De Minimis Waste Discharge Requirements for the Santa Ana Region (Order No.  R8‐2015‐0004, NPDES No. CAG998001) would govern dewatering activities during construction.   Compliance with Order No. 2003‐0003‐DWQ/Order No. R8‐2015‐0004, NPDES No. CAG998001 would  ensure Project construction dewatering would not cause State waste discharge and Federal NPDES permit  requirements to be exceeded.  SEIR No. 332 MM 5.4‐1 would further reduce impacts related to  groundwater contamination to less than significant levels, and the level of impact would not increase from  that identified in SEIR No. 339.    In addition to the potential for aerially deposited lead and groundwater contamination, portions of the  Santa Ana River bridge overpass may include asbestos containing materials (ACM) and lead based paint  (LBP) and existing traffic striping along Orangewood Avenue may also include LBP.  The Phase I ESA does  not identify a REC for ACM or LBP; however, these hazardous materials are likely present within the  Project boundaries based on historical application.  Thus, there is potential for accidental release during  ground disturbance activities.  All disturbance activities would conform to DTSC guidelines as well as SEIR  No. 332 MM 5.4‐1 and MM 5.4‐7.  SEIR MM 5.4‐7 requires preparation of an asbestos survey.  If ACM is  identified, SEIR No. 332 MM 5.4‐7 requires remediation and mitigation procedures conform with the  Remediation Procedures Report, and in accordance with Federal, State, and local law.  SEIR No. 332 also  requires that structures constructed prior to 1973 are screened for LBP prior to demolition.  If LBP is  identified, SEIR No. 332 MM 5.4‐7 requires it is mitigated in accordance with the procedures set forth in  the Remediation Procedures Report.  Conformance with DTSC Guidelines, as well as SEIR No. 332 MM 5.4‐ 1 and MM 5.4‐7 would ensure impacts related to accidental release of ACM and LBP are less than  significant, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    The Orangewood Avenue and the local roadway system would continue to operate as it does presently,  except for the additional travel lane and other related Project improvements.  Roadway maintenance  activities could require limited quantities of hazardous materials, as needed; however, such activities  would be temporary in nature and would be similar to the roadway segment’s existing maintenance  practices.  No long‐term impacts would occur in this regard, and the level of impact would not increase  from that identified in SEIR No. 339.      The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana  River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  The proposed amendments reflect anticipated future development of these areas,  which is similar in intensity to what the General Plan already permits. Currently the General Plan  designates the subject properties for Mixed Use Urban Core and Open Space land use. The proposed  amendments for Area 1 and 1A would spread the intensities permitted General Plan Mixed‐Use Urban  Core land use designation over a slightly larger area; however, the amendments would not increase the  maximum intensities permitted by the General Plan for the Platinum Triangle. The proposed amendments  for Area 2 would change the land use designation for Open Space to Parks; the General Plan permits both  uses at the same maximum FAR of 0.10. There would be no change in the General Plan designations for  the remainder of the area subject to the reorganization.  Any future development of the area subject to  the reorganization would be subject to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted type and  intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can  anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. Therefore, no  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-53 Environmental Analysis long‐term impacts would occur in this regard, and the level of impact would not increase from that  identified in SEIR No. 339.      Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the use and  handling of hazardous materials, substances, and wastes within the PTMLUP would be subject to  conformance with appropriate State and Federal rules and regulations through the permitting process  and that no unauthorized use of hazardous materials would be allowed.  Thus, although proposed mixed‐ use developments could emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,  substances, or wastes within one‐quarter mile of an existing or proposed school, impacts would be less  than significant.  Because these impacts were considered less than significant, they were not further  analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  The nearest school, Sycamore Elementary School, is located approximately  0.29‐mile to the southeast of the Project Site at 340 Main Street in the City of Orange.  No schools are  located within one‐quarter mile of the Project Site.  Thus, no impacts associated with emitting hazardous  emissions or handling hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one‐quarter  mile of an existing or proposed school would result, and the level of impact would not increase from that  identified in SEIR No. 339.      Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    d) Would the project be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the Platinum  Triangle would not involve significant impacts concerning hazardous materials sites following  conformance with existing Federal and State regulations that govern hazardous material and waste  management.  To further reduce risk of accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment,  the Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 recommends implementation of MMP No. 106A MM 5.4‐1 through MM  5.4‐7, prepared for SEIR No. 332.  Because these impacts were considered less than significant, they were  not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.      Project-Specific Analysis:  According to the Phase I ESA, the Project Site is not listed pursuant to  Government Code Section 65962.5 (also known as the “Cortese Listing”).  No impacts would result in this  regard and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.      Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-54 Environmental Analysis   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 Appendix A.   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the PTMLUP is  not affected by the Airport Land Use Plan for the Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton  Municipal Airport; thus, PTMLUP buildout would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or  working in the project area and no mitigation was necessary.  Because there were no impacts, they were  not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 found that the PTMLUP area is not located  within an airport land use plan, nor is the area within two miles of a public airport.  As a roadway widening  and annexation project, the Project would not involve the installation of aboveground structures that  could represent a safety hazard to air traffic.  Therefore, no impacts associated with public airport safety  hazards would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    f) Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the City of  Anaheim’s emergency preparedness plan complied with State law and interfaced with other cities and  counties within Southern California and that the City also participates in the Standardized Emergency  Management System (SEMS).  The Initial Study concluded that although PTMLUP buildout would intensify  land uses within the Project area, impacts would be less than significant since all new development would  be required to accommodate emergency vehicle.  Because these impacts were considered less than  significant, they were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  The City of Anaheim’s Hazard Mitigation Plan and the City of Orange’s Multi‐ Hazard Functional Plan were prepared in response to the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 to outline the  operations and activities that would occur in the event of a disaster.  Although the Project would  temporarily impact traffic flow along Orangewood Avenue during construction, Project construction  would not substantially interfere with traffic circulation as Project construction would occur over a limited  timeframe and traffic lanes in each direction along Orangewood Avenue would remain open.  No new  development is proposed within the Santa Ana River reorganization area as part of this Project.      Over the long term, the roadway widening would improve traffic flows along the affected segment and  therefore may enhance the roadway’s function as an emergency access route, if necessary.  The proposed  Orangewood Avenue roadway widening is anticipated to improve area circulation opportunities.  Project  implementation would not require revisions to the City of Anaheim or City of Orange’s adopted  emergency response plans.  If development is proposed in the Santa Ana River reorganization area in the  future, analysis of hazards would be conducted at that time and measures would be proposed to reduce  impacts, if required.  Thus, impacts concerning emergency response or evacuation plans would be less  than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-55 Environmental Analysis g) Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 Appendix A.   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that PTMLUP  buildout would not expose people or structures to significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland  fires since the PTMLUP area is developed and no undeveloped wildland areas are in or adjacent to the  PTMLUP area.  Because there were no impacts, they were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  The Project Site is not identified as a Wildland Fire Hazard Area by Figure  5.6‐2 (Environmental and Natural Hazard Policy Map) of the Orange General Plan EIR.  The Project Site is  primarily surrounded by urban development in addition to a channelized portion of the Santa Ana River.   As a roadway improvement project, the Project would not involve the construction of habitable structures  which would expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury,  or death involving wildland fires. The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and  PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of  these areas, but not a specific development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the  reorganization would be subject to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted location, type  and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can  anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. Therefore, no  impacts associated with wildland fires would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that  identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    3.9.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    SEIR No. 332 includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated development and infrastructure  improvements within the Platinum Triangle.  The following measures from SEIR No. 332 are applicable to  the Proposed Project.10  Any modifications to the original measures are shown in strikethrough for deleted  text and new, inserted text is underlined.    5.4‐1 On‐going during demolition and construction, in the event that hazardous waste is discovered  during site preparation or construction, the property owner/developer City shall ensure that  the identified hazardous waste and/or hazardous material is handled and disposed of in the  manner specified by the State of California Hazardous Substances Control Law (Health and  Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5) and according to the requirements of the California  Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 22. In addition, the property owner/developer City shall  report the finding of hazardous waste to the Orange County Health Care Agency and Anaheim  Fire Department.      10 Mitigation measure numbering corresponds to the Final Platinum Triangle Subsequent Environmental Impact  Report Appendix A, Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program Number 106A, dated August 2005.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-56 Environmental Analysis 5.4‐2 On‐going during project operation, the applicant City shall handle and dispose of all hazardous  materials and wastes during the operation and maintenance of facilities in accordance with  the State codes identified in Mitigation Measure No. 5.4‐1 and under Anaheim Fire  Department supervision.    5.4‐6 Prior to issuance of grading permits for each development project, a Phase I Site Assessment  shall be prepared by the property owner/developer City and submitted to the City of Anaheim  Public Works Department, Development Services Division, for review and approval.  If actual  or potential impacts are identified by the Phase I, a Phase II ESA will be completed for the site  by the owner/developer City and the results will be submitted to the Planning Department.   During the Phase II ESA, samples from potential areas of concern will be collected and  submitted for laboratory analysis to confirm the nature and extent of potential impacts.  If  hazardous materials are identified during the site assessments, the property owner/developer  City shall notify the finding to the Anaheim Fire Department and the appropriate  response/remedial measures will be implemented in accordance with the directives of the  OCHCA and/or the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), as appropriate.  If soil is  encountered during site development that is suspected of being impacted by hazardous  materials, work will be halted and site conditions will be evaluated by a qualified  environmental professional.  The results of the evaluation will be submitted to OCHCA and/or  RWQCB, and the appropriate response/remedial measures will be implemented, as directed  by OCHCA, RWQCB, or other applicable oversight agency, until all specified requirements of  the oversight agencies are satisfied and a no‐further‐action status is attained.    5.4‐7 Prior to issuance of a grading permit or a demolition permit for any buildingDuring the Plans,  Specifications, and Estimate phase, an asbestos survey shall be conducted and submitted to  the Planning Department, Building Division,Public Works Department, Development Services  Division, by the property owner/developer City.  If the materials are found to contain asbestos  fibers, demolition shall be conducted in accordance with the remediation and mitigation  procedures detailed in Remediation Procedures Report, and in accordance with Federal,  State, and local law.  Buildings Structures constructed prior to 1973 shall be screened for lead‐ based paint prior to demolition.  If lead‐based paint is identified, it shall be mitigated in  accordance with the procedures set forth in the Remediation Procedures Report.    Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339  SEIR No. 339 does not include mitigation measures for hazards and hazardous materials.       SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-57 Environmental Analysis 3.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY   Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality?  b. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?  c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river or through the addition of impervious services, in a manner which would:  1) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? 2) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite? 3) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 4) Impede or redirect flood flows? d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?  e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?    A Basis of Design Report Santa Ana River at Orangewood Avenue Bridge Crossing, Anaheim, California  Scour Analysis (Basis of Design Report) was prepared by Michael Baker in March 2020.  This report is  included as Appendix D, Basis of Design Report, and is summarized below.     a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements  or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 Appendix A.   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that compliance  with current water quality regulations associated with the City of Anaheim’s Local Implementation Plan,  the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP), and the County area‐wide Storm Water  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-58 Environmental Analysis Runoff Permit would reduce potential water quality impacts to a less than significant level.  Because these  impacts were considered less than significant, they were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:      CONSTRUCTION‐RELATED IMPACTS    Surface water quality is subject to Federal, State, and local water quality requirements administered and  enforced by the EPA, the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), and the RWQCB with  cooperation from each county.  The principal law governing pollution of the nation’s surface waters is the  CWA (formerly the Federal Water Pollution Control Act).  Under the CWA, regulatory requirements for  industrial and municipal dischargers were set, as well as requirements for states to adopt water quality  standards.    The Proposed Project would widen an existing segment of Orangewood Avenue to accommodate a new  westbound travel lane and related improvements. The roadway improvements would increase impervious  surface areas along the affected segment of Orangewood Avenue which could consequently increase the  potential for surface runoff.  The Project would be subject to conformance with SEIR No. 339 MM 3‐2,  which requires compliance with NPDES General Construction Permit requirements, including preparation  of a SWPPP and incorporation of sediment control BMPs to reduce the potential for offsite and  downstream water quality impacts; refer also to Response 3.6 (b) above and SEIR No. 339 MM 3‐2 below.   Implementation of the SWPPP would reduce potential runoff and pollutants associated with Project  construction activities to the maximum extent feasible.  Further, grading activities associated with Project  construction would be required to demonstrate conformance with Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 17.04,  Grading, Excavations, Fills, Watercourses, and the City of Orange Grading Ordinance (Orange Municipal Code  Chapter 16.40).  Following conformance with SEIR No. 339 MM 3‐2, as well the Anaheim Municipal Code  and Orange Municipal Code grading requirements, the Project’s construction‐related impacts to water  quality standards would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from that  identified in SEIR No. 339. The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP  associated with the Santa Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas,  but not a specific development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization  would be subject to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted type and intensity of  development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that  the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    LONG‐TERM OPERATIONAL IMPACTS    Although the Proposed Project is not exempt from the requirements of the Orange County Model Water  Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the specific structural items, typically included in a WQMP for  mitigating the impacts of additional impervious surfaces created by a project, would be constructed as  part of the adjacent Orangewood Avenue Improvement Project (SCH #2004121045) located to the west  of the Proposed Project.  As the Orangewood Avenue Improvement Project would precede the  implementation of this Proposed Project, this Proposed Project’s additional impervious area would be  sufficiently mitigated when its construction begins.  Furthermore, the Project proposes improvements to  the local drainage system to capture flow from the widened bride and roadway improvements and convey  local drainage flow to the Santa Ana River.  Specifically, an existing drainage facility located at the eastern  portion of the Santa Ana River would be relocated slightly north of the existing location.  Roadway  widening activities would also install curb, gutter, and storm drain improvements along the affected  segment of Orangewood Avenue.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-59 Environmental Analysis   Following implementation of the proposed improvements to the local storm drainage system, stormwater  would be collected and treated such that long‐term operational impacts to water quality would be less  than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.     To determine the Project’s long‐term operational impacts to the Santa Ana River, a scour analysis was  prepared for the Proposed Project as part of the Basis of Design Report to ensure the design of the bridge  structure improvements would account for any potential removal of material along the channel as a result  of hydraulic forces; refer to Appendix D.  Currently, there are a series of existing grade control structures  in the Santa Ana River that currently protect the channel from long‐term scour.  However, based on the  scour analysis, the existing bridge is susceptible to local scour.      The proposed bridge structure improvements would increase the water surface elevation within the limits  of the Project resulting in an anticipated depth of total scour of 22.9 feet within the vicinity of the bridge.   With implementation of proposed scour countermeasures (e.g., modified bridge footings or placement of  a permeable articulated concrete block [ACB] mat), the Project would protect the existing and proposed  bridge foundations (i.e., bridge piers and pilings) from scour, improving the existing condition.  As such,  impacts related to scour would be less than significant in this regard.    b) Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 Appendix A.   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that impacts  concerning substantially interfering with groundwater recharge would be less than significant since the  Platinum Triangle is largely developed with urban uses and does not represent a substantial  groundwater recharging area.  SEIR No. 339 noted that an additional groundwater well would be constructed  within the PTMLUP area; however, this additional groundwater well would not substantially deplete  groundwater supplies based on its location near the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Groundwater Basin.   SEIR No. 339 determined that conformance with existing regulatory requirements and standard conditions of  approval would ensure the impacts related to groundwater supplies are less than significant.     Project-Specific Analysis:      GROUNDWATER SUPPLIES    During construction, limited water supplies would be required for dust control and maintenance of  construction vehicles and equipment.  Based on the Projects scope and limited construction duration, it  is not anticipated that construction would substantially deplete groundwater supplies.  The Project does  not propose the installation of landscaped medians or any other Project features which would require  public water service during operation.  The proposed water line extension is required to enhance the City  of Orange’s water system and create the redundancy necessary for existing capacity requirements.   Thus, the Project would not impact groundwater supplies such that it would impede sustainable  groundwater management of the basin, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified  in SEIR No. 339. The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-60 Environmental Analysis with the Santa Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a  specific development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would  be subject to analysis pursuant to CEQA. However, given that the permitted type and intensity of  development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR, one can anticipate that the level  of impact to groundwater supplies would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    GROUNDWATER RECHARGE    As a roadway widening project, long‐term operations of the Proposed Project would have the potential  to interfere with groundwater recharge due to Orangewood Avenue’s increase in impervious surfaces.   Although the Proposed Project would increase the amount of impervious surface area analyzed under  SEIR No. 339, the Project footprint would involve a segment of Orangewood Avenue which is already  largely built‐out with impervious surfaces.  Nonetheless, the Project would be designed such that it  minimizes grading and maintains the roadway’s existing drainage pattern to reduce potential impacts on  groundwater recharge.  The Project would implement design measures and BMPs to ensure that  stormwater runoff volumes from the site do not increase from existing conditions; refer to Response 3.9  (a).  The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa  Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would be subject  to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be  similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would  not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. Accordingly, the Project would not impact groundwater  recharge such that it would impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin, and the level of  impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 Appendix A.   1) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 noted that the runoff rates  are expected to remain approximately the same as existing conditions, since PTMLUP buildout would not  increase the runoff volume within the PTMLUP area.  The Initial Study concluded that compliance with  the design requirements of the City and the OCFCD would ensure that runoff is properly conveyed and  discharged as appropriate.  Therefore, potential impacts associated with increases in runoff, including  potential increased erosion or siltation, would be less than significant.  Because these impacts were  considered less than significant, they were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.     Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to Response 3.10 (a).      Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-61 Environmental Analysis 2) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite? Previous Significance Determination: The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that PTMLUP  buildout would not significantly increase the amount of impervious surface within the Platinum Triangle  and that runoff rates would remain approximately the same as existing conditions.  The Initial Study  determined that the Project would result in less than significant impacts concerning substantially altering  the existing drainage pattern of the site or area following compliance with the design requirements of the  City and the OCFCD.  Because these impacts were considered less than significant, they were not further  analyzed in SEIR No. 339.     Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to Response 3.9 (c), above.  As described in Section 2.0, Project  implementation would realign a segment of the Santa Ana River Trail along the western portion of the  Santa Ana River, and reconstruct a segment of the trail along the eastern portion of the River to facilitate  installation of new bridge support structures required for the bridge widening.  The Proposed Project  would not substantially alter the course of the Santa Ana River; the proposed improvements would be  designed and constructed to maintain free flow beneath the bridge structure in conformance with  OCFCD requirements.  The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP  associated with the Santa Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these  areas, but not a specific development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the  reorganization would be subject to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted type and  intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can  anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.  Therefore,  impacts associated with the Proposed Project would be less than significant, and the level of impact  would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    3) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Previous Significance Determination: The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that impacts to  water quality would be less than significant following compliance with the existing regulatory framework  (i.e., local grading ordinance, State General Construction Permit, and County area‐wide MS4 Storm Water  Runoff Permit) would ensure that impacts are reduced to less than significant levels.  The Initial Study  concluded that impacts concerning runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or  planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of pollutant runoff  would be less than significant.  Because these impacts were considered less than significant, they were  not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.     Project-Specific Analysis:  No substantial change from previous analysis.  Refer to Responses 3.9 (a) and  3.9 (c) above.  The Project would widen approximately a half‐mile segment of Orangewood Avenue and  thus would result in increased impervious surface area.  The Project would demonstrate conformance  with the State’s General Construction Permit, the Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 17.04 (Grading,  Excavations, Fills, Watercourses), and the City of Orange Grading Ordinance (Orange Municipal Code  Chapter 16.40).  Conformance with these measures would ensure Project construction does not result in  additional sources of polluted runoff.  The Project would include the annexation of land adjacent to the  Santa Ana River; however, no new development is proposed within the Santa Ana River reorganization  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-62 Environmental Analysis area as part of this Project.  Thus, Project implementation would not create or contribute runoff water  which would exceed the existing or planned stormwater drainage systems, and the level of impact would  not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Further, with the implementation of BMPs, and compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations the  Project would not substantially degrade water quality.  The Project would not result in substantial  additional sources of polluted runoff, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR  No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    4) Impede or redirect flood flows? Previous Significance Determination: Refer to Response 4.10 (c)(2) and 4.10 (c)(3).     Project-Specific Analysis:  No substantial change from previous analysis.  Refer to Response 4.10 (c)(2)  and 4.10 (c)(3).    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.  d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 Appendix A.     Previous Significance Determination:      Flood Hazard    The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the PTMLUP area is located within a Federal Emergency  Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Special Flood Hazard Area designated as  “Zone A99” and “X.”  Based on these designations, the Initial Study concluded that PTMLUP buildout  would involve less than significant impacts concerning potential flooding.  Because these impacts were  considered less than significant, they were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.  Nonetheless, SEIR No.  339 includes MM 3‐1 to require documentation that any structures must be at least 3 feet higher than  the 100‐year flood zone.      Tsunami    SEIR No. 339 did not evaluate the potential for PTMLUP buildout to be subject to tsunami‐related impacts.      Seiche    The PTMLUP area does not support surface water bodies capable of causing a seiching event.   Therefore,  the Initial Study determined that PTMLUP buildout would not be subject to seiche‐related impacts.   Because there were no impacts, they were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-63 Environmental Analysis Project-Specific Analysis:      Flood Hazard    Flood hazard areas identified on the FIRM are labeled “Special Flood Hazard Area” (SFHA).  FEMA  identifies SFHAs as high‐risk areas subject to inundation by one‐percent‐annual chance flood.11  The one‐ percent annual chance flood is also referred to as the base flood or 100‐year flood.  Federal floodplain  management regulations and mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements apply in these zones.   According to FEMA FIRM Panel 142, Map No. 06059C0142J (effective December 3, 2009), the Project Site  is located in two FEMA Flood Zones: Flood Zone “X (Other Flood Areas)” and Flood Zone “A.”      Most of the affected roadway segment is located in Flood Zone “X,” which FEMA defines as an area of  moderate flood hazard that has between a one percent and 0.2 percent chance of flooding within a given  year.  This is commonly described as the area subject to flooding between the 100‐year/base flood and  500‐year flood.  FEMA further identifies this area as protected from the one‐percent annual chance or  greater flood hazard by the Santa Ana River levee system.  Thus, roadway improvements occurring within  these areas would not place structures within a 100‐year flood hazard area and a less than significant  impact would occur.     The Orangewood Avenue bridge widening and Santa Ana River Trail improvements are located within  Flood Zone “A,” which FEMA defines as areas subject to inundation by the one‐percent annual chance  flood event.  Thus, these improvements would be sited in a 100‐year floodplain as designated by FEMA.   Although these improvements would be installed within a 100‐year floodplain, the bridge support and  Santa Ana River trail improvement would be designed such that impacts to the FEMA‐designated Flood  Zone are minimized and Santa Ana River flow is preserved; refer to Response 3.9 (d) above.  These  improvements would not reduce the functionality of the Santa Ana River’s existing levee system.      The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana  River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would be subject  to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted location, type and intensity of development would  be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact  would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. Thus, impacts concerning the placement of  structures within a 100‐year flood hazard area would be less than significant and the level of impact  would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.     No habitable aboveground structures are proposed under the Project and no new development would  occur as a result of the Santa Ana River reorganization area; thus, the Project would not place housing  within a 100‐year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance  Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map.  Thus, SEIR No. 339 MM 3‐1 is not applicable to the  Proposed Project.  No impact would occur in this regard, and the level of impact would not increase from  that identified in SEIR No. 339.       11 Federal Emergency Management Agency Website, FEMA Zone Definitions, http://www.floodadvocate.com/fema‐ zone‐definitions/?gclid=CjwKEAjw4vzKBRCt9Zmg8f2blgESJADN5fDgTspDzPxBH5dp9mar2pUN_suNf1cjN8Rj8Vko6HTHHxoCzGz  w_wcB, Accessed October 4, 2017.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-64 Environmental Analysis Tsunami    The Project Site is located nearly 12 miles inland of the Pacific Ocean.  As a result, the Project is located  at a sufficient distance so as not to be subject to tsunami impacts.  No impact would occur in this regard.     Seiche    The Project is not located by a large, confined water body capable of causing a seiching event.  Thus,  there would be no impact associated with exposure of people or structures to seiche, and the level of  impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.      Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    e) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?    This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 Appendix A.   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that impacts to  water quality would be less than significant following compliance with the existing regulatory framework  (i.e., local grading ordinance, State General Construction Permit, and County area‐wide MS4 Storm Water  Runoff Permit) would ensure that impacts are reduced to less than significant levels.  The Initial Study  concluded that impacts concerning runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or  planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of pollutant runoff  would be less than significant.  Because these impacts were considered less than significant, they were  not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to Responses 3.9 (a) and 3.9 (c) above.  The Project would widen  approximately a half‐mile segment of Orangewood Avenue and thus would result in increased  impervious surface area.  The Project would demonstrate conformance with the State’s General  Construction Permit, as well as the Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 17.04 (Grading, Excavations, Fills,  Watercourses) and the City of Orange Grading Ordinance (Orange Municipal Code Chapter 16.40).   Conformance with these measures would ensure Project construction does not result in additional sources  of polluted runoff.  As designed, the Project would not increase peak flow rates leaving the site, and  discharge velocities would not be increased when compared to existing conditions.  Thus, Project  implementation would not create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the existing or planned  stormwater drainage systems, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No.  339.  The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa  Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would be  subject to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted type and intensity of development would  be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact  would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. With the implementation of BMPs, and  compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations the Project would not substantially degrade water  quality.  The Project would not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, and the level of  impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-65 Environmental Analysis Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    3.10.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    Refer to the Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339 below, which are based on adopted Mitigation  Measures from SEIR No. 332.     Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated the development and  infrastructure improvements within the Platinum Triangle.  The following measure from SEIR No. 339 is  applicable to the Proposed Project.12  Any modifications to the original measure is shown in strikethrough  for deleted text and new, inserted text is underlined.    MM 3‐2 Prior to the initiation of grading activities, for projects greater than one acre, coverage for the  project must be obtained by electronically submitting permit registration documents to the  State or obtaining coverage via current general construction permit prescribed method by  the property owner/developer City pursuant to State and Federal National Pollution  Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements.  As part of the Notice of Intent, a  Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared.  The property  owner/developer City shall also prepare and submit to the Development Services Division  of the Public Works Department, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) in accordance  with the City’s municipal NPDES requirements and Chapter 7 of the Orange County Drainage  Area Management Plan.  The WQMP must be approved prior to issuance of grading permit.   The SWPPP, in conjunction with the WQMP, will describe the structural and nonstructural  best management practices (BMPs) that will be implemented during construction (short‐ term) within the Project Area as well as BMPs for long‐term operation of the Project Area  that address potential impacts to surface waters.      12 Mitigation measure numbering corresponds to Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan Appendix C, Updated and  Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program Number 106C.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-66 Environmental Analysis This page intentionally left blank.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-67 Environmental Analysis 3.11 LAND USE AND PLANNING   Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Physically divide an established community?  b. Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?    a) Would the project physically divide an established community?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that no physical  division of an established community would result from implementation of the PTMLUP and no  mitigation was required.  Because there were no impacts, this topic was not further analyzed in SEIR No.  339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  The Project Site involves an approximately half‐mile long segment of the  existing roadway (Orangewood Avenue) generally east of Rampart Street and ending just east of Eckhoff  Street, consists of improved roadway right‐of‐way, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and infrastructure  improvements.  The Project is surrounded by channelized portions of the Santa Ana River, and developed  areas consisting of SR‐57, commercial, and residential land uses.     Project implementation would not divide an established community.  Further, the proposed Orangewood  Avenue roadway widening is anticipated to improve area circulation opportunities along the affected  segment to further advance community connectivity.  Additionally, the proposed reorganization of  municipal jurisdiction along the Santa Ana River would not result in any development that could physically  divide an established community.  As such, no impacts concerning the division of an established  community would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.     Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    b) Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 on page 5.4‐5.   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that PTMLUP buildout would result  in less than significant impacts to City and SCAG land use plans, policies, and regulations following  conformance with existing regulatory requirements.  However, SEIR No. 339 concluded that the  PTMLUP would be inconsistent with the Anaheim General Plan’s Public Services and Facilities Element  Goal 8.1, as high‐rise residential towers (A‐Town Metro project) could potentially interfere with the  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-68 Environmental Analysis Southern California Gas Company’s microwave tower’s telecommunications function.  Impacts in this  regard were determined to remain significant and unavoidable, and a Statement of Overriding  Considerations was adopted by the City Council when SEIR No. 339 was certified.    Following SEIR No. 339 certification, SEIR No. 339 Addendum No. 4 evaluated the amended A‐Town Metro  Project which included a Development Agreement amendment, Anaheim General Plan amendment, and  PTMLUP amendment.  Addendum 4 found that A‐Town Metro Project would be consistent with all  applicable goals and policies of the General Plan’s Land Use, Economic Development, and Community  Design Elements.  Additionally, the Addendum 4 concluded that the A‐Town Metro included a  provision to limit the maximum height of buildings; however, impacts would continue to be significant  and unavoidable and no change to the level of significance from that of SEIR No. 339 would occur.      Project-Specific Analysis:  As a roadway segment, the Project Site (Orangewood Avenue) does not have  a City of Anaheim or City of Orange land use designation.  However, in addition to roadway improvements  along Orangewood Avenue, the Proposed Project would reorganize land within the Project area through  a municipal boundary adjustment within the Project limits to annex land outside of the City limits  (currently in the City of Orange) into the City of Anaheim, incorporating properties within the City’s  sphere of influence and expanding the boundaries of Platinum Triangle; refer to Exhibit 2‐5.  Table 2‐1  shows the existing and proposed land use designations and zoning for the areas proposed for annexation.   Refer also to Exhibits 2‐6 through Exhibit 2‐9 for proposed land use designations and zoning within the  reorganizational area, respectively.  In addition to LAFCO approval, the changes to the municipal  boundaries and proposed land use and zoning in the reorganizational area would require amendments  to the General Plan Land Use Element, Zoning Map, and Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan; refer  to Exhibit 2‐10.  The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated  with the Santa Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a  specific development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would  be subject to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted type and intensity of development  would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of  impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Area 1A and Area 1    As shown on Exhibit 2‐5, Area 1A and Area 1 are located south of Orangewood Avenue and bound by  North Net Training Center (2400 Orangewood Avenue) to the west and the Santa Ana River Trail to the  east.  The proposed reorganization would realign a sliver of the North Net Training Center property to  allow the entire parcel to be located within the Anaheim city limits and would continue to provide  operational use for the North Net Training Center. The Project proposes to amend the General Plan Land  Use Element to change the land use designation for Area 1A and Area 1 from Open Space to Mixed‐Use  Urban Core (refer to Exhibits 2‐6 and 2‐7). In addition, the Project would amend the Zoning Map to  reclassify Area 1A and Area 1 to the “PR” Public Recreational Zone and Sub Area B of the Orangewood  District of the PTMU Overlay Zone. The Project would also amend the PTMLUP to include Area 1A and 1  in Sub Area B of the Orangewood District.  The proposed amendments would be consistent with the  existing North Net Training Center.    The Mixed‐Use Urban Core designation is intended for a mix of uses, including residential, commercial,  services, hotel, and professional office uses in a high‐quality, pedestrian‐friendly environment.  The  maximum density for the residential component of mixed‐use development is up to 100 dwelling units  per acre.  The maximum floor area ratio for the non‐residential component of mixed‐use development is  3.00.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-69 Environmental Analysis The intent of the PTMU Overlay Zone is to provide opportunities for well‐designed development projects  that combine residential with non‐residential uses.  Non‐residential uses may office, retail, business  services, personal services, public spaces and uses, and other community amenities within the portions  of the Platinum Triangle designated with the Mixed‐Use, Office High, and Office Low designations in the  Anaheim General Plan.    The proposed amendments would not increase the maximum permitted development above the 321  dwelling units previously analyzed in the SEIR No. 339 for Sub Area B of the Orangewood District of the  PTMU Overlay Zone.  In the event the subject properties, including the existing North Net Training Center,  are considered for future development, the maximum development intensity of 321 dwelling units would  apply to all of Sub Area B.  However, this is not anticipated in the near future at this time.  As such, the  proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP for Area 1A and Area 1 would result  in a less than significant impact concerning conflicts with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation,  and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Area 2A Stadium Sliver    The proposed reorganization does not include a sliver of the Angel Stadium property (Area 2A) as depicted  in Exhibit 2‐5. The Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County (LAFCO) adopted Resolution  No. RO 21‐04 approving the “Santa Ana River Reorganization – Area 2A” on October 13, 2021.  Area 2A  continues to provide parking for Angel Stadium and no changes are proposed to Area 2A’s land use  designation or zoning, which were amended in 2007 in anticipation of this reorganization with the City of  Orange.  The Stadium District Sub‐Area A Project Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment  (Development Project No. 2020‐00127), prepared by LSA and dated July 2020, analyzed development of  this property consistent with its General Plan designation and zoning.      Area 2     As shown on Exhibit 2‐5, Area 2 is located north of Orangewood Avenue and consists of a regional bike  trail and landscaping. The City is currently studying the potential to purchase Area 2 from the OCFCD for  the development of a park as part of a future, separate and independent project. A General Plan  Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment would be required to change Area 2 land use designation from  Open Space to Parks and zoning to the PR Zone; refer to Exhibits 2‐6 through 2‐9.  The Parks designation  allows for active and passive recreational uses such as parks, trails, athletic fields, interpretive centers,  and golf courses.  The Parks land designation permits a maximum floor area ratio of 0.10.  The PR zone  implements the Parks land use designation.  The intent of the PR zone is to establish for the benefit of the  health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Anaheim and its visitors, a zone to preserve, regulate,  and control the orderly use and enjoyment of City‐owned properties and facilities and adjacent private  property.  Properties within the purview of the PR zone include: (a) City‐owned properties, whether the  same is exclusively occupied by the City or is used by others on the basis of some agreement with or  concession by the City; and (b) adjacent private properties, whose uses and development have an impact  on the use and enjoyment of City‐owned properties and facilities. As such, the proposed amendments  would not conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation, and the less than significant level  of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.   SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-70 Environmental Analysis Area 3 and Remaining Area    The General Plan Circulation Element would continue to designate Area 3, Orangewood Avenue, as a  Primary Arterial.  The General Plan Land Use Element would continue to designate the remaining area  north and south of Orangewood Avenue, between the Proposed City Boundary and Areas 1, 1A, 2 and 2A,  for Open Space land use. The Open Space land use designation applies to properties intended to remain  in natural open space; utility easements that will provide recreational and trail access to Anaheim’s  residents; heavily landscaped freeway remnant parcels, and land areas surrounding major water features.  The Proposed Project would apply the OS Zone to this area.  The OS Zone is the implementing Zone for  the General Plan Open Space land use designation and permits a maximum floor area ratio of 0.10.   Currently, the City of Anaheim Zoning Map does not include this area within any Zone.   Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    3.11.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    SEIR No. 332 does not include mitigation measures for land use and planning.    Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 mitigation measures are not applicable to the Proposed Project.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-71 Environmental Analysis 3.12 MINERAL RESOURCES   Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?  b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?    a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the PTMLUP  area does not include mineral resources and the PTMLUP area; thus, PTMLUP implementation would not  result in the loss of the availability of mineral resources that would be of regional value.  Because there  were no impacts, these resources were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  The Anaheim General Plan Green Element states that parts of East Anaheim,  Anaheim Canyon, and the Hill and Canyon Areas are included in Mineral Resources Zone (MRZ) MRZ‐ 2.  The Orange General Plan Natural Resources Element designates the sand and gravel resources  (aggregate) contained in and along the Santa Ana River as mineral resources.  The Project’s proposed  improvements along the Santa Ana River Trail would occur within an area designated by the Orange  General Plan as containing mineral resources.  However, these improvements would be limited to  realigning a small segment of the Santa Ana River Trail and relocating an existing drainage facility located  at the eastern portion of the Santa Ana River to accommodate the proposed bridge widening.  Five existing  bents situated along the River bottom would be lengthened for the widening and scour improvements  are proposed to protect the proposed bridge structure.  The nature of these improvements would not  change the availability of aggregate resources contained in and along the Santa Ana River.   The proposed  amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River  reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific development  project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would be subject to analysis  pursuant to CEQA. Given that the location and the permitted type and intensity of development would be  similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would  not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.  The City of Orange evaluates development within areas  containing aggregates or other deposits which are significant to the regional economy to ensure adequate  mitigation or preservation of these areas for future aggregate mining opportunities.  Thus, impacts  concerning the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and  the residents of the State would be less than significant, and the level of increase would not increase from  that identified in SEIR No. 339.     Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-72 Environmental Analysis b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the PTMLUP  area does not contain any mineral resources and that PTMLUP implementation would not result in the  loss of the availability of mineral resources that would be of regional value.  Because there were no  impacts, these resources were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  As discussed in Response 3.11 (a), above, the Project would not result in the  loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,  specific plan, or other land use plan, and the level of increase would not increase from that identified in  SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    3.12.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    SEIR No. 332 does not include mitigation measures for mineral resources.    Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 332 does not include mitigation measures for mineral resources.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-73 Environmental Analysis 3.13 NOISE   Would the project result in: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?  b. Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?  c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?    a) Would the project result in generation of substantial temporary or permanent increases in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 page 5.5‐19.   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 determined that PTMLUP implementation could  expose persons to, or generate, noise levels in excess of standards established in the Anaheim General  Plan and Anaheim Noise Ordinance (Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 6.70, Sound Pressure Levels).   Specifically, SEIR No. 339 concluded that PTMLUP buildout would result in a significant increase in noise  generated by vehicular traffic along Gene Autry Way from I‐5 to State College Boulevard and on State College  Boulevard from Orangewood Avenue to Gene Autry Drive.  SEIR No. 339 also determined that PTMLUP  buildout would allow for noise‐sensitive residential units which may be exposed to mobile and stationary  noise levels that exceed State and/or City standards and that building façades that are exposed to noise  levels that exceed 69 A‐weighted decibels (dBA) would require architectural improvements to achieve  the required 45 dBA community noise equivalent level (CNEL) interior noise level limits.    Despite implementation of SEIR No. 339 MMs 5‐1 through 5‐5 and MM 5‐7 through 5‐10, impacts  concerning exposure to mobile‐ and stationary‐source noise and vibration were determined to remain  significant and unavoidable, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City  Council when SEIR No. 339 was certified.      Project-Specific Analysis:  It is difficult to specify noise levels that are generally acceptable to everyone;  what is annoying to one person may be unnoticed by another.  Standards may be based on documented  complaints in response to documented noise levels, or based on studies of the ability of people to sleep,  talk, or work under various noise conditions; however, all such studies recognize that individual responses  vary considerably.  Standards usually address the needs of the majority of the general population.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-74 Environmental Analysis   SHORT‐TERM CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS    Construction activities generally are temporary and have a short duration, resulting in periodic increases  in the ambient noise environment.  Construction of the Proposed Project would occur over approximately  12 months and would include demolition, grading, paving, and roadway construction.  Groundborne  noise and other types of construction‐related noise impacts typically occur during the initial site  preparation.  This phase of construction has the potential to create the highest levels of noise; however,  it is generally the shortest of all construction phases.  Typical noise levels generated by construction  equipment are shown in Table 3.13‐1, Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Construction Equipment.   Operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve one or two minutes of full power  operation followed by three to four minutes at lower power settings.  Other primary sources of acoustical  disturbance would be due to random incidents, which would last less than one minute (such as dropping  large pieces of equipment or the hydraulic movement of machinery lifts).    Table 3.13‐1  Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Construction Equipment  Type of Equipment Acoustical Use Factor Lmax at 50 Feet (Dba) Concrete Saw 20 90 Concrete Mixer Truck 40 79 Backhoe 40 78 Dozer 40 82 Excavator 40 81 Forklift 40 78 Paver 50 77 Roller 20 80 Tractor 40 84 Water Truck 40 80 Grader 40 85 General Industrial Equipment 50 85 Jackhammer 20 89 Note: 1. Acoustical Use Factor (percent): Estimates the fraction of time each piece of construction equipment is operating at full power (i.e., its loudest condition) during a construction operation. Source: Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA-HEP-05-054), January 2006.     The closest sensitive uses in the Project area include a surgical center (Orangewood Surgical Center)  located approximately 70 feet to the northeast, and residential uses located approximately 20 feet to the  southeast.  These sensitive uses may be exposed to elevated noise levels during Project construction.   However, as the Project involves the widening of a roadway, construction noise would not be  concentrated in one location for extended periods of time, since construction equipment would move in  a linear fashion along the Project area.  The remainder of the Project Site is surrounded by commercial,  institutional, and industrial uses.     Construction noise is regulated by the Anaheim Municipal Code and Orange Municipal Code.  In  conformance with Anaheim Municipal Code, construction noise sources are exempted from the City’s  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-75 Environmental Analysis Noise Ordinance standards between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM.  Similarly, the Orange Municipal  Code exempts construction noise sources from the City’s Noise Ordinance standards between the hours  of 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM on weekdays.  The Proposed Project would be subject to compliance with the  construction time limitations identified in Anaheim Municipal Code Section 6.70.010 and Orange  Municipal Code Section 8.24.070.  Following adherence to the Municipal Code construction time  regulations as well as implementation of SEIR No. 339 MMs 5‐7 through 5‐10, short‐term construction  noise impacts would not result in new or significantly increased impacts as compared to the level  identified in SEIR No. 339.    LONG‐TERM OPERATIONAL IMPACTS    Project implementation would not introduce a new noise‐generating source.  As described above, Project  implementation would accommodate existing and future traffic levels associated with buildout of the  PTMLUP.  The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the  Santa Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would be subject  to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the location and the permitted type and intensity of development  would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of  impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.      Therefore, long‐term noise levels would be consistent with those analyzed as part of SEIR No. 339, as the  Project would not generate additional traffic beyond what was analyzed in SEIR No. 339 and its addenda;  refer to Section 3.17.  Generally, a 3 dBA change in the existing ambient noise level is required to instigate  a perceivable/noticeable difference in the ambient noise environment.  According to the Caltrans  Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol (2013), a doubling of traffic on a roadway  is required to result in an increase of 3 dB (a barely perceptible increase).  The proposed Orangewood  Avenue widening would not accommodate a doubling of existing traffic, and thus, would not result in a  perceptible increase in traffic noise levels.  No new long‐term noise impacts would occur as a result of  Project operations.  Following adherence to SEIR No. 339 MM 5‐7 through MM 5‐10, long‐term noise  impacts would not result in new or significantly increased impacts as compared to the level identified in  SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    b) Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 pages 5.5‐29 and  5.5‐31.   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that PTMLUP implementation had the  potential to result in exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or  groundborne noise levels.  Specifically, SEIR No. 339 found that PTMLUP construction activities would  generate substantial levels of groundborne vibration and groundborne noise in the vicinity of vibration‐ sensitive land uses and that vibration‐sensitive receptors could be exposed to substantial levels of  groundborne vibration and groundborne noise in the vicinity of the Amtrak/Metrolink line.  Despite  implementation of SEIR No. 339 mitigation measures, impacts related to generation of substantial levels  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-76 Environmental Analysis of groundborne vibration and groundborne noise in the vicinity of vibration‐sensitive land uses were  determined to remain significant and unavoidable, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was  adopted by the City Council when SEIR No. 339 was certified.    Project-Specific Analysis:      SHORT‐TERM CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS    Project construction would have the potential to result in varying degrees of temporary groundborne  vibration, depending on the specific construction equipment used and the operations involved.  Vibration  generated by construction equipment spreads through the ground and diminishes in magnitude with  increases in distance.  Construction vibration could represent a source of annoyance to the identified  sensitive receptors along the affected segment of Orangewood Avenue.  Construction activities would  occur as close as 100 feet from the Orangewood Surgical Center and 300 feet from the closest sensitive  receptors.  Based on reference vibration levels analyzed in SEIR No. 339, vibration levels from typical  construction equipment would diminish substantially at 100 feet and would not exceed thresholds for  structural damage or levels that are strongly perceptible as identified by the Federal Transit  Administration (FTA) and Caltrans.  Pile driving would occur for the modifications to the bridge structure  over the Santa Ana River.  However, these activities would occur more than 500 feet from the nearest  structure.  At this distance, construction vibration levels would diminish below the distinctly perceptible  level.  As such, short‐term construction vibration would not result in new or significantly increased  impacts as compared to the level identified in SEIR No. 339.  No mitigation would be required.    LONG‐TERM OPERATIONAL IMPACTS    As a roadway widening and annexation project, operations would not generate a new source of  groundborne vibration.  As indicated in Section 3.17, the proposed improvements would not increase  vehicular capacity of Orangewood Avenue.  Impacts would be less than significant, and long‐term  operational impacts would not result in new or significantly increased impacts as compared to the level  identified in SEIR No. 339.    In addition, the proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the  Santa Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would be subject  to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be  similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would  not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    c) Would the project be located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 page 5.5‐34.   SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-77 Environmental Analysis Previous Significance Determination:  As discussed in Section 3.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials,  SEIR No. 339 identified three existing locations within the vicinity of the Platinum Triangle that support  helicopter takeoffs/landings.  SEIR No. 339 also disclosed that future heliports/helipads could be  constructed in the Platinum Triangle area atop new high‐rise structures for fire and emergency response  use.  SEIR No. 339 determined that despite the potential for noise‐sensitive uses to be placed in proximity  to heliports/helipads and areas of helicopter activity, use of these heliports would be infrequent.   Therefore, SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with private airstrip/heliport/helipad noise to be less  than significant.    SEIR No. 339 determined that the Platinum Triangle area is not located within an airport land use plan or  within two miles of a public airport.  The nearest public airports to the Platinum Triangle Area include  John Wayne Airport, located approximately eight miles to the south, and Fullerton Municipal Airport,  located approximately eight miles to the northwest.  Therefore, SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts  associated with public airport noise would occur.    Project-Specific Analysis:  The western extent of the Project Site is adjacent to two City of Anaheim  heliports which could potentially pose helicopter safety hazards: Angels Stadium and the North Net Fire  Training Center.  In addition, the City of Orange includes three heliports: UC Irvine Medical Center;  Children’s Hospital of Orange County; and the SCE Serrano Substation; refer to Response 3.8 (f).    Roadway construction activities would involve temporary impacts to ambient noise.  However, based on  the degree of changes identified in Section 2.0, Project implementation would not expose people residing  or working in the Project area to excessive noise impacts beyond what was already analyzed within SEIR  No. 339.  Project operations would not introduce a new noise generating source.  For this reason, impacts  concerning helicopter noise levels would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339, and impacts  would be less than significant.     The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana  River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would be subject  to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be  similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would  not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    As stated above, the Platinum Triangle (including the Project Site) is not located within an airport land use  plan or within two miles of a public airport.  Therefore, no impacts associated with public airport noise  would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    3.13.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    Refer to the Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339 below, which are based on adopted Mitigation  Measures from SEIR No. 332.     SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-78 Environmental Analysis Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated the development and  infrastructure improvements within the Platinum Triangle.  The following measures from SEIR No. 339 are  applicable to the Proposed Project.13   Any modifications to the original measures are shown in  strikethrough for deleted text and new, inserted text is underlined.    MM 5‐7 Ongoing during grading, demolition, and construction, the property owner/developer City  shall be responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to limit  construction‐related noise:    a. Noise generated by construction, shall be limited by the property owner/developer  City to 60 dBA along the property boundaries, before 7:00 AM and after 7:00 PM, as  governed by Chapter 6.7, Sound Pressure Levels, of the Anaheim Municipal Code.    b. Limit the hours of operation of equipment that produces noise levels noticeably  above general construction noise levels to the hours of 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM.  c. All internal combustion engines on all of the construction equipment shall be properly  outfitted with well‐maintained muffler systems.    MM 5‐8 Ongoing during construction activities, the property owner/developer City shall be  responsible for requiring project contractors to properly maintain and tune all construction  equipment to minimize noise emissions.    MM 5‐9 Ongoing during construction activities, the property owner/developer City shall be  responsible for requiring project contractors to locate all stationary noise sources (e.g.,  generators, compressors, staging areas) as far from occupied noise‐sensitive receptors as is  feasible.    MM 5‐10 Ongoing during construction activities, material delivery, soil haul trucks, and equipment  servicing shall also be restricted to the hours set forth in the City of Anaheim Municipal Code,  Section 6.70.         13 Mitigation measure numbering corresponds to Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan Appendix C, Updated and  Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program Number 106C.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-79 Environmental Analysis 3.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING   Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?  b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?    a) Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 on page 5.6‐13.   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that the residential and non‐ residential development accommodated through PTMLUP implementation would directly and  indirectly induce population growth.  Although PTMLUP buildout would result in indirect and direct  population growth, the SEIR No. 339 concluded that it would be consistent with SCAG’s regional growth  management policies since its implementation would result in a more balanced jobs/housing ratio when  compared to existing conditions.  No impacts were identified and no mitigation was required.    Project-Specific Analysis:  As a roadway improvement and annexation project, the Proposed Project  would not directly induce substantial population growth in an area through the introduction of new  residential housing or businesses, as neither of these uses would occur with Project implementation.  The  Project does not involve roadway extensions, and would be limited to the introduction of a new  westbound travel lane (and associated improvements) to accommodate existing and anticipated  vehicular traffic associated with buildout of the PTMLUP. The proposed amendments to the General Plan,  Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future  development of these areas, but not a specific development project.  Any future development of the area  subject to the reorganization would be subject to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted  type and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339,  one can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.  As  such, the Project is not anticipated to induce substantial unplanned population growth in the area, either  indirectly or directly.  A less than significant impact would occur in this regard, and the level of impact  would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-80 Environmental Analysis b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 Appendix A.   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 determined that PTMLUP  implementation would not displace people or residential development.  As such, impacts in this regard  were not further analyzed in SEIR No 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  No housing units would be displaced as a result of Project implementation.   Existing residential land uses are present within the Project vicinity.  However, all Project improvements  would occur along an existing segment of Orangewood Avenue, OCFCD‐managed segments of the Santa  Ana River Trail, and Santa Ana River reorganization area, which is currently vacant land. The proposed  amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River  reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific development  project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would be subject to analysis  pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be similar to what  was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase  from that identified in SEIR No. 339.  As such, Project implementation would not displace any existing  housing units or people requiring the construction of additional replacement housing units elsewhere  and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.   Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    3.14.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    SEIR No. 332 does not include mitigation measures for population and housing.    Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 does not include mitigation measures for population and housing.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-81 Environmental Analysis 3.15 PUBLIC SERVICES   Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:  1) Fire protection?  2) Police protection?  3) Schools?  4) Parks?  5) Other public facilities?    a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services:   1) Fire Protection?    Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 determined that Platinum Triangle buildout would  necessitate additional fire facilities, delay the AFD’s response time for first engine response, and increase  demand for other operational sections of the AFD.  To mitigate these impacts to fire protection services, SEIR  No. 339 concluded that increases in property tax revenues generated by PTMLUP buildout would be used  for additional AFD staffing needs.  Furthermore, the Public Safety Impact Fee would be collected at the  time of issuance of building permits for projects in the Platinum Triangle, providing funds for the  construction of new fire facilities.  SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with fire protection facilities  to be less than significant with the incorporation of SEIR No. 339 MM 7‐1 and MM 7‐2.      Project-Specific Analysis:  The Proposed Project would not result in the construction of aboveground  structures which are at risk to fire and would not directly or indirectly induce significant population  growth; refer to Response 3.13 (a).  As a roadway widening and annexation project, the Project would  not result in the need for additional new or physically altered AFD or City of Orange Fire Department  (OFD) fire protection facilities.  In fact, Project implementation would result in a long‐term benefit to fire  protection services, as it would improve traffic flow along Orangewood Avenue through its addition of a  new westbound travel lane, thereby improving emergency response times.  As a roadway infrastructure  and annexation project, SEIR No. 339 MM 7‐1 and 7‐2 are not applicable to the Proposed Project since  the Project does not require fire sprinklers or require the payment of Public Safety Impact Fees.  No  impacts would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-82 Environmental Analysis Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    2) Police Protection?   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that PTMLUP buildout would require  an increase in police facilities and staffing at the Anaheim Police Department (APD).  To mitigate these  impacts to police protection services, SEIR No. 339 concluded that increases in property tax revenues  generated by PTMLUP buildout would be used to for additional APD staffing needs.  Furthermore, the  Public Safety Impact Fee would be collected at the time of issuance of building permits for projects in the  Platinum Triangle, providing funds for the construction of new police protection facilities.  The SEIR found  impacts associated with police protection facilities to be less than significant with the incorporation of  SEIR No. 339 MM 7‐3 through MM 7‐7.      Project-Specific Analysis:  The Proposed Project would not directly or indirectly induce significant  population growth; refer to Response 3.13 (a) above.  As a roadway widening and annexation project, the  Project would not result in the need for additional new or physically altered APD or Orange Police  Department (OPD) police protection facilities.  In fact, Project implementation would result in a long‐term  benefit to police protection services, as it would improve traffic flow along Orangewood Avenue through  its addition of a new westbound travel lane, thereby improving emergency response times.  As a roadway  infrastructure and annexation project, SEIR No. 339 MM 7‐3 through 7‐7 are not applicable to the  Proposed Project, since the Project does not require safety measures for crime prevention, does not  include parking lots or parking structures, and does not require the payment of Public Safety Impact Fees.   No impacts would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    3) Schools?   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that residential development within  the Platinum Triangle would generate additional students requiring school services in the Anaheim City  School District and Anaheim Union High School District.  To mitigate impacts to school services, SEIR  No. 339 concluded that developer payment of school fees levied by Anaheim City School District and  Anaheim Union High School District would reduce potential school‐related impacts to a less than  significant level.  SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with schools to be less than significant with the  incorporation of SEIR No. 339 MM 7‐8 and MM 7‐9.      Project-Specific Analysis:  As a roadway infrastructure and annexation project, the Proposed Project  would not directly or indirectly induce significant population growth; refer to Response 3.13 (a).  Thus,  the Project would not generate school‐aged students that would create a demand on local schools for  educational services.  As a roadway infrastructure and annexation project, SEIR No. 339 MM 7‐8 and 7‐9  are not applicable to the Proposed Project since the Project would not impact the school districts.  No  impacts would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    4) Parks?   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that PTMLUP buildout would generate  additional residents which would increase local demand for parks and recreational facilities and could  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-83 Environmental Analysis exacerbate existing overuse of parks in the City.  However, the SEIR concluded that compliance with  Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.20.110.010, which establishes requirements for recreational space  within the PTMU Overlay Zone, would ensure that recreational space would increase proportional to  population growth in the Platinum Triangle.  SEIR No. 339 concluded that impacts associated with parks  and recreational facilities would be less than significant following conformance with existing applicable  regulations and SEIR No. 339 MM 8‐1 through MM 8‐3.      Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer the responses above.  As a roadway widening and annexation project,  no new residents would be generated that would impact or create a need for additional local parks or  other public facilities.  Further, the Project would not increase the capacity of the road such that an  indirect population growth would result.   SEIR No. 339 MM 8‐1 through MM 8‐3 are not applicable to  the Proposed Project because the Project would not negatively affect parks or recreational facilities.  No  impact would occur in this regard, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in  SEIR No. 339. In fact, the Project would amend the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP to designate  additional land within the Platinum Triangle for future Park use. The future development of a Park use  would be subject to analysis pursuant to CEQA. However, given that development of the area proposed  for Park use would be similar in intensity to its current designation as Open Space, one can anticipate  that the level of impact would not increase significant from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    5) Other public facilities?   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 determined that PTMLUP buildout would generate  additional residents which would increase demands for other public facilities in the area, including  libraries.  SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with public facilities such as libraries to be less than  significant with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 MM 7‐10, which requires payment of development impact  fees which would pay for additional library materials and services needed to serve the PTMLUP area.       Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to the responses above.  As a roadway widening and annexation  project, no new residents would be generated that would impact or create a need for other public  facilities, such as libraries.  Further, the Project would not increase the capacity of the road such that an  indirect population growth would result.   SEIR No. 339 MM 7‐10 is not applicable to the Proposed  Project because the Project would not affect library services.  No impact would occur in this regard, and  the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    3.15.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    SEIR No. 332 does not include mitigation measures for public services.    Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 mitigation measures are not applicable to the Proposed Project.   SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-84 Environmental Analysis This page intentionally left blank.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-85 Environmental Analysis 3.16 RECREATION   Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?  b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?    a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 determined that PTMLUP buildout would generate  additional residents which would increase local demand for parks and other recreational amenities and  could exacerbate existing overuse of parks in the City.  However, SEIR No. 339 concluded that compliance  with Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.20.110.010, which establishes requirements for recreational  space within the PTMU Overlay Zone, would ensure that recreational space would increase proportional  to population growth in the Platinum Triangle.  SEIR No. 339 determined that PTMLUP buildout would  result in less than significant impacts to parks and recreational facilities following compliance with  applicable regulations and the incorporation of SEIR No. 339 MM 8‐1 through MM 8‐3.      Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to Response 3.15 (a)(4).  As a roadway widening and annexation  project, Project implementation would not involve substantial population growth or increased demand  for or use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities.  The Project does not  propose the construction or expansion of recreational facilities.  SEIR No. 339 MM 8‐1 through MM 8‐3  are not applicable to the Proposed Project because the Project would not negatively affect parks or  recreational facilities.  No impacts concerning parks and recreational facilities would occur in this regard,  and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. In fact, the Project would  amend the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP to designate additional land within the Platinum  Triangle for future Park use. The future development of a park would be subject to analysis pursuant to  CEQA. However, given that development of the area proposed for Park use would be similar in intensity  to its current designation as Open Space, one can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase  significant from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?   SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-86 Environmental Analysis Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 determined that PTMLUP buildout would generate  additional residents which would increase local demand for parks and other recreational amenities and  could exacerbate existing overuse of parks in the City.  However, the SEIR concluded that compliance with  Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.20.110.010, which establishes requirements for recreational space  within the PTMU Overlay Zone, would ensure that recreational space would increase proportional to  population growth in the Platinum Triangle.  SEIR No. 339 determined that PTMLUP buildout would result  in less than significant impacts to parks and recreational facilities following compliance with applicable  regulations and incorporation of SEIR No. 339 MM 8‐1 through MM 8‐3.      Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to Response 3.15 (a).  The Proposed Project would include the  construction of a bicycle lane along the widened Orangewood Avenue and realignment of the Santa Ana  River Trail.  Additionally, the Proposed Project would install new retaining walls under the Orangewood  Avenue bridge structure to maintain the existing trail.  The Project would also include the annexation of  land near the Santa Ana River; however, no new development is proposed within the Santa Ana River  reorganization area as part of this Project.  The Proposed Project’s potential environmental impacts  associated with the construction of the abovementioned recreational facilities are analyzed in this  Addendum.  Construction of the bicycle lane and the proposed trail improvements would be subject to  compliance with all applicable local, State, and Federal laws, ordinances, and regulations, as well as the  specific mitigation measures applicable to the Proposed Project identified within this Addendum.   Compliance with the relevant laws, ordinances, and regulations, as well as the specified mitigation  measures, would ensure the potential impacts associated with the proposed recreational facilities  improvements are considered less than significant.  Overall, the addition of bike lane would result in  beneficial impacts in regard to recreational opportunities and connectivity in the region.  As such, physical  effects on the environments as a result of the Proposed Project would be less than significant and the  level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    3.16.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    SEIR No. 332 mitigation measures are not applicable to the Proposed Project.      Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 mitigation measures are not applicable to the Proposed Project.   SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-87 Environmental Analysis 3.17 TRANSPORTATION   Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?  b. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?  c. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?  d. Result in inadequate emergency access?    As discussed in Section 3.0, Project implementation would widen Orangewood Avenue from a five‐lane  roadway to a six‐lane divided facility to provide expanded vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian access, and  annexation of land near the Santa Ana River; refer to Exhibit 2‐3.  The Project would incorporate an  additional westbound through lane through the Project Site boundaries to ensure acceptable operations  through the Project area and accommodate the PTMLUP’s proposed land use intensities.  Project  implementation would improve queuing along Orangewood Avenue; however, the proposed additional  westbound through lane would not increase roadway capacity along the affected segment.     Orangewood Avenue is a west‐east roadway with two travel lanes in each direction.  The posted speed  limit along the affected roadway segment is 40 miles per hour.  The Anaheim General Plan Circulation  Element identifies the roadway as a Primary Arterial and the Orange General Plan Circulation and  Mobility Element identifies the roadway as a Primary Arterial west of Eckhoff Street and a Major Arterial  east of Eckhoff Street.  The Orange General Plan and Anaheim General Plan designate the cross section  for a Primary Arterial as a four‐lane divided roadway with 115 feet of right‐of‐way and the Orange General  Plan designates the cross section for a Major Arterial as a six‐lane divided roadway.     The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana  River reorganization portion of the Project reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not  a specific development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would  be subject to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted type and intensity of development  would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of  impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.      a) Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 on page 5.9‐39.   SEIR No. 339 concluded that PTMLUP build‐out of would increase traffic volumes on Caltrans facilities  and thus would conflict with an applicable congestion management program.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-88 Environmental Analysis Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that PTMLUP build‐out of would  increase traffic volumes on Caltrans facilities and thus would conflict with an applicable congestion  management program.  SEIR No. 339 also concluded that PTMLUP buildout would impact the level of  service for the area roadway system and therefore would conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or  policy establishing the effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system.  Despite incorporation  of SEIR No. 339 MM 9‐1 through MM 9‐15, impacts related to the level of service for the area roadway  system and increased traffic volumes on Caltrans facilities were determined to remain significant and  unavoidable, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City Council when SEIR  No. 339 was certified.      Project-Specific Analysis:      LOCAL LEVEL OF SERVICE CONSISTENCY    The objective of the Proposed Project is to accommodate existing and predicted traffic flows associated  with PTMLUP buildout by widening Orangewood Avenue from a five‐lane facility to six lanes generally  from the Santa Ana River to just east of SR‐57 at the SR‐57/Orangewood Avenue interchange.  Although  the Project would be designed to accommodate additional traffic volumes, the proposed improvements  would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the roadway.   Additionally, as the Project would improve intersection level of service and reduce queueing, the Project  would not conflict with (i.e. lower) an established measure of effectiveness for performance of the system  (i.e. level of service).  Instead, Project implementation would improve conditions along the roadway,  allowing for improved traffic flows and circulation.  As a roadway widening Project, SEIR No. 339 MM 9‐ 1 through MM 9‐15 are not applicable to the Proposed Project because the Project implementation  would not result in traffic impacts.      The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana  River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would be subject  to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be  similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would  not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.      For the reasons above, the Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy  establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the affected circulation system and the  level of impacts would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.     REGIONAL CMP CONSISTENCY    Orange County Transportation Agency (OCTA) is charged with adopting the Orange County Congestion  Management Plan (CMP).  In the City of Anaheim, CMP facilities include Harbor Boulevard, State College  Boulevard, Katella Avenue, Tustin Avenue, Orangethorpe Avenue, Beach Boulevard, Imperial Highway, as  they intersect with I‐5, SR‐57, and SR‐91.  In the City of Orange, the only CMP facilities include the SR‐55  northbound and southbound ramps at Katella Avenue. 14         14 Orange County Transportation Authority, 2015 Orange County Congestion Management Program, Figure 4: CMP  Level of Service Chart, November 2015.   SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-89 Environmental Analysis The Proposed Project would affect an approximately half‐mile long segment of Orangewood Avenue,  which is not designated as a CMP facility by the OCTA.  The Project would widen a segment of  Orangewood Avenue to accommodate existing and predicted traffic associated with PTMLUP buildout.   Therefore, the proposed improvements would further the long‐term transportation needs identified by  SEIR No. 339 to ensure transportation infrastructure can adequately meet the demands associated with  PTMLUP buildout.  As discussed, SEIR No. 339 MM 9‐1 through MM 9‐15 are not applicable to the  Proposed Project because the Project implementation would not result in traffic impacts.  The Project  would not conflict with an applicable congestion management program, and the level of impact would  not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.       The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana  River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would be subject  to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be  similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would  not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.      Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.  b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? In September 2013, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) signed SB 743 into law, starting  a process that fundamentally changes the way transportation impact analysis is conducted under CEQA.   These changes include the elimination of auto delay, LOS, and similar measurements of vehicular roadway  capacity and traffic congestion as the basis for determining significant impacts.  The guidance identifies  Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) as the most appropriate CEQA transportation metric, along with the  elimination of auto delay and LOS for CEQA purposes.  The justification for this paradigm shift is that auto  delay/LOS impacts lead to improvements that increase roadway capacity and therefore induce more  traffic and greenhouse gas emissions.      The previously certified SEIR No. 339 did not evaluate VMT as it was not required in the CEQA Guidelines  at the time SEIR No. 339 was prepared.    On October 26, 2010, the City of Anaheim certified the SEIR No. 339 that analyzed the potential impacts  associated with development of the revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project.  Although this previous  environmental document did not include a VMT analysis, a supplemental environmental analysis of VMT  impacts cannot be required absent new information on that front.  The implementation of project design  features and mitigation measures related to vehicle emissions have typically been incorporated into air  quality and greenhouse gas emissions analyses.  Thus, the effect of increased VMT could have been raised  in 2010 when the City considered the EIR.  A challenge to an EIR must be brought within 30 days of the  lead agency’s notice of approval.  (Pub. Resources Code, § 21167[b].)  Under Public Resources Code  Section 21166(c), an agency may not require a supplemental environmental review unless new  information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the EIR was approved,  becomes available.  After a project has been subjected to environmental review, the statutory  presumption flips in favor of the project proponent and against further review.  (Moss v. County of  Humboldt [2008] 162 Cal.App.4th 1041, 1049‐1050.)  “‘[S]ection 21166 comes into play precisely because  in‐depth review has already occurred [and] the time for challenging the sufficiency of the original EIR has  long since expired.’”  (Id., 1050.)  There is no competent evidence of new information of severe impact,  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-90 Environmental Analysis and thus the City may rely on an addendum.  Accordingly, the City finds that VMT is not “new information”  under Public Resources Code Section 21166.  Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that although PTMLUP buildout could  result in an increase in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and trips in the local area, the PTMLUP would benefit  to the Southern California Association Government (SCAG) region as it would allow for housing  opportunities closer to employment centers.  SEIR No. 339 determined that the PTMLUP would therefore  be consistent with SCAG’s strategies to reduce VMT in the SCAG region and would be consistent with  Southern California Air Quality Management District’s 2007 Air Quality Management Plan (2007 AQMP),  which was the applicable air quality plan at the time.  Impacts concerning conflicting with or obstructing  implementation of the SCAQMD’s 2007 AQMP were identified as less than significant, and no mitigation  was identified.      SEIR No. 339 also concluded that PTMLUP buildout had the potential to generate greenhouse gas (GHG)  emissions, either directly or indirectly (including VMT consideration), that may have a significant impact  on the environment.  Specifically, SEIR No. 339 found that the project evaluated in the SEIR would  generate substantially more GHG emissions compared to the adopted PTMLUP and would cumulatively  contribute to climate change impacts in California.  Mitigation measures from several environmental  sections of SEIR No. 339 were identified to reduce GHG emissions, including:  MM 2‐3, MM 2‐5, MM 2‐6,  MM 9‐1, MM 9‐2, MM 9‐12, MM 9‐14, MM 10‐7, MM 10‐9, MM 10‐12, MM 10‐13, MM 10‐14, MM 10‐ 18, MM 10‐19, MM 10‐20, MM 10‐21, MM 10‐22, and MM 10‐24.  Despite implementation of the  abovementioned mitigation measures, impacts related to GHG emissions were determined to remain  significant and unavoidable, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City  Council when SEIR No. 339 was certified.      Project-Specific Analysis:  As discussed above, SEIR No. 339 did not address VMT as it was not required  in the CEQA Guidelines at the time SEIR No. 339 was prepared.  Construction of the Proposed Project  would widen the existing bridge structure to increase traffic flow through the Project area and increase  efficiency through the intersections.  The proposed roadway widening would accommodate existing and  predicted traffic demands in compliance with SEIR No. 339 MM 2‐5 and would not directly generate new  traffic or increase the numbers of vehicles along the roadway.  Further, it is acknowledged that OPR has  adopted VMT screening criteria to determine if a project requires a detailed VMT analysis pursuant to  the Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (Technical Advisory), dated April  16, 2018.  Per the Technical Advisory, projects that would not likely lead to a substantial or measurable  increase in vehicle travel, and therefore generally should not require an induced travel analysis, include:     Rehabilitation, maintenance, replacement and repair projects designed to improve the condition  of existing transportation assets (e.g., highways, roadways, bridges, culverts, tunnels, transit  systems, and assets that serve bicycle and pedestrian facilities) and that do not add additional  motor vehicle capacity.    As the Proposed Project is replacing the existing bridge structure, improving transportation assets  (including bicycle and pedestrian facilities), and would not add additional motor vehicle capacity beyond  what was considered in SEIR No. 339, a VMT analysis would not be required.  The proposed amendments  to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River reorganization reflect  anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific development project.  Any future  development of the area subject to the reorganization would be subject to analysis pursuant to CEQA.  Given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐ analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the Project would not generate additional VMT beyond  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-91 Environmental Analysis SEIR No. 339 conditions and would not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3,  subdivision (b).  No impact would occur in this regard.    Significance Determination:  No increase in significant impacts has resulted.    c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 page 5.9‐105.   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that PTMLUP implementation would  not create sharp curves, dangerous intersections, or any other inherently hazardous design features.  SEIR  No. 339 determined in accordance with MMP No. 106C, the property owner/developer would dedicate,  including necessary construction easements, the ultimate arterial highway rights‐of‐way as shown in the  Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan adjacent to their property to maintain adequate levels  of service and access with the Platinum Triangle.  Impacts associated with hazardous geometric design  features or incompatible land uses were considered less than significant with incorporation of SEIR No.  339 MM 9‐16 and MM 9‐17.      Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to Response 3.16 (a).  The Project would widen an existing linear  segment of Orangewood Avenue that does not presently include sharp curves.  In addition, the proposed  roadway improvements would not introduce a hazardous design feature such as sharp curves or  dangerous intersections.  Project implementation is intended to support existing and predicted traffic  levels associated with buildout of the PTMLUP, and would improve intersection LOS and reduce queueing  to improve safety on the roadway.  As discussed under Response 3.16 (a), SEIR No. 339 MM 9‐16 and  MM 9‐17 are not applicable to the Proposed Project.  Thus, Project implementation would not  substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible use and the level of  impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.     The land uses associated with the annexation of land in the Santa Ana River area would be compatible  with the existing land uses in the Project vicinity. The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning  Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future  development of these areas, but not a specific development project.  Any future development of the area  subject to the reorganization would be subject to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted  type and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339,  one can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.      Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access?   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that the PTMLUP’s proposed roadway  system is designed to accommodate the increased traffic volumes and each development project is  required to provide appropriate fire and emergency access, as approved by the AFD.  All vehicle access  would be designed and improved in accordance with the requirements of the City Engineer.  Impacts  concerning emergency access were determined to be less than significant.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-92 Environmental Analysis Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to Responses 3.16 (a) and 3.16 (b).  The Project would include  improvements along an approximately half‐mile segment of Orangewood Avenue.  Temporary lane  closures, if any, could have the potential to impact emergency vehicle access to adjacent properties due  to temporary lane closures.  However, Project implementation would contribute to enhanced emergency  access along Orangewood Avenue by improving existing traffic conditions and accommodating future  traffic generated from PTLUMP buildout.  Pursuant to Orange Municipal Code Section 12.64,  Encroachments in the Public Rights‐of‐Way, all improvements occurring within Orange right‐of‐way  would require an encroachment permit issued by the Director of Public Works.  All improvements  occurring within City of Anaheim right‐of‐way would require preparation of a Right‐of‐Way Construction  Application for approval by the Director of Public Works.  As Project construction would obtain all  necessary permits from each respective jurisdiction, the Project’s construction and operational impacts  concerning emergency access would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase  from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    The land uses associated with the annexation of land in the Santa Ana River area would be compatible  with the existing land uses in the Project vicinity. The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning  Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future  development of these areas, but not a specific development project.  Any future development of the area  subject to the reorganization would be subject to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted  type and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339,  one can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.      Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    3.17.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    SEIR No. 332 mitigation measures are not applicable to the Proposed Project.      Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 mitigation measures are not applicable to the Proposed Project.       SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-93 Environmental Analysis 3.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES   Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:  1) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or  2) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.    In 2004, the Governor of California signed into law Senate Bill 18 (SB18) which requires that, prior to the  adoption or amendment of a city or county’s general plan, the city or county conduct consultations with  California Native American tribes for the purpose of preserving specified places, features, and objects that  are located within the city or county’s jurisdiction.  SB 18 refers to PRC 5097.9 and 5097.995 (remunerated  to PRC 5097.993), which defines a cultural place as:     Any Native American Sanctified Cemetery, place of worship, religious or ceremonial site or sacred  shrine located on public property.  Native American historic, cultural, or sacred site, that is listed or may be eligible for listing in the  California Register of Historic Resources pursuant to Section 5024.1, including any historic or  prehistoric ruins, any burial ground, and any archaeological or historic site.   SB 18’s intent is to facilitate meaningful consultation between tribal governments and local governments  at the earliest point of the planning and application process. The Native American Heritage Commission  (NAHC) maintains a list of California Native American Tribes and pursuant to Government Code Section  65352.3, prior to the adoption or any amendment of a city’s or county’s general plan, proposed on or  after March 1, 2005, the city or county shall conduct consultations with California Native American tribes  that are on NAHC’s contact list. From the date of city or county who contacts the California Native  American tribe, the tribe has 90 days to request a consultation, unless that tribe has agreed to a shorter  timeframe. Additionally, pursuant to Government Code Section 65040.02, the city or county shall protect  the confidentiality of information concerning the specific identify, location, character and use of those  places, features, and objects.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-94 Environmental Analysis The City of Anaheim recognizes the requirements of SB 18 and the purpose of preserving, mitigating  impacts and identifying cultural places located on the project site and in relation to General Plan  Amendments associated with the proposed project. Implementation of these requirements is described  below.    In 2014, the governor of California approved AB 52, which expanded CEQA by establishing a formal  consultation process for California tribes within the CEQA process.  The bill specifies that any project may  affect or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource would require  a lead agency to “begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditional and  culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the Proposed Project.”  Section 21074 of AB 52 also defines  a new category of resources under CEQA called “tribal cultural resources.”  Tribal cultural resources are  defined as “sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a  California Native American tribe” and is either listed on or eligible for the California Register of Historical  Resources or a local historic register, or if the lead agency chooses to treat the resource as a tribal cultural  resource.      AB 52 specific that a project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance  of a tribal cultural resource, as defined, is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment.  The bill requires a lead agency to begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is  traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project, if the tribe  requested to the lead agency, in writing, to be informed by the lead agency of proposed projects in that  geographic area and the tribe requests consultation, prior to determining whether a negative declaration,  mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report is required for a project. These  requirements apply to projects that have a notice of preparation or a notice of negative declaration filed  or mitigated negative declaration on or after July 1, 2015.  Thus, since this is an addendum to a previously‐ certified EIR, AB 52 does not apply to this Project.      On Tuesday, May 25, 2021, the City submitted and initiated a Tribal Consultation List request for a list of  California Native American tribes’ contacts and a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search from the NAHC. On  Thursday, June 10, 2021, the NAHC responded to the City’s request and returned a populated Tribal  Consultation List with California Native American Tribes’ contact information for tribes that have  traditional lands or cultural places within the boundaries of the county (Orange County), which the project  site is located within. Additionally, NAHC returned results for the SLF and the results came back negative.  The City wrote SB 18 notification letters to all of the tribes listed on the Tribal Consultation List that NAHC  provided. The letters explain the proposed project, which includes General Plan amendments as part of  this City initiated action. On Tuesday, June 15, 2021, the City emailed and certified mailed physical copies  of these letters to the tribes on the Tribal Consultation List.  Refer to Appendix E, SB 18 Consultation  Memorandum.    To date, only two tribes have responded to the City’s SB 18 notification letters. The City also took effort  to facilitate consultation efforts, to ensure and confirm if any tribes contacted wanted to proceed with  consultation or defer not to have consultation. The City sent out follow up emails asking the tribes to  provide confirmation of consultation interest or deferral on Wednesday, July 21, 2021 and on Tuesday,  August 10, 2021. As mentioned previously, only two tribes responded to the City’s SB 18 notification  letters.     Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation (Kizh Nation): On Wednesday, June 16, 2021,  Kizh Nation responded to the City’s SB 18 notification via email, asking for clarifications behind  the proposed project’s activities. Upon the City clarifying details for Kizh Nation, they decided that  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-95 Environmental Analysis there would be no need for consultation and communicated that via email on Tuesday, June 22,  2021.    Pala Band of Mission Indians (Pala Band): On Wednesday, June 21, 2021, Pala Band responded to  the City’s July 21, 2021 SB 18 follow up email, with an attached letter stating, in summation – that  they would be not requesting consultation.     No other tribe has contacted the City since the latest August 10, 2021 follow up email.     The 90 day window for consultation request closed on September 14, 2021.    a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:   1) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or   Previous Significance Determination:  At the time of the release of the Notice of Preparation for SEIR  No. 339, Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines did not include environmental issues regarding potential  impacts to Native American‐related historical resources.  As discussed in Response 3.5 (a), the Initial Study  for SEIR No. 339 concluded that the Platinum Triangle does not contain any historical resources as defined  by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. The Platinum Triangle is not located within the Anaheim Colony  Historic District and none of the structures within the PTMLUP area were identified on the Qualified  Historic Structures list of the Anaheim Colony Historic District Preservation Plan.  No known historic  archaeological sites within the PTMLUP were identified.  The Initial Study concluded that no impacts would  occur and no mitigation was necessary.  Because there were no impacts, these resources were not further  analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  As discussed above, SEIR No. 339 did not address tribal cultural resources.   However, according FSEIR No. 332, the PTMLUP does not have any historical resources as defined in CEQA  Guidelines Section 15064.5.  Also, there are no historic archaeological sites located within the PTMLUP  and the potential for any subsurface cultural resources is considered remote.  According to Orange  General Plan EIR Figure 5.5‐1 (Designated Historic Resources) and Section 5.4, Cultural Resources, of the  Anaheim General Plan EIR, no historical or archaeological resources have been identified in the Project  vicinity.  As the Project involves a fully‐improved segment of Orangewood Avenue, a disturbed area near  the Santa Ana River (associated with the annexation of land adjacent to the Santa Ana River), as well as a  channelized portion of the Santa Ana River, the Project’s impacts concerning Native American‐related  historical resources would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from that  identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-96 Environmental Analysis 2) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.   Previous Significance Determination:  At the time of the release of the Notice of Preparation for SEIR  No. 339, CEQA Guidelines Appendix G did not include environmental issues regarding potential impacts  to tribal cultural resources.  Therefore, tribal cultural resources were not evaluated in SEIR No. 339.      Project-Specific Analysis:  As discussed above, the Project is not subject to AB 52 and did not undergo  the AB 52 consultation process.  Nonetheless, no Native American historical or archaeological resources  were identified within the Project vicinity as part of SEIR No. 339 and no new impacts have been identified  since certification of SEIR No. 339.  As the Project involves a fully‐improved segment of Orangewood  Avenue, a disturbed area near the Santa Ana River (associated with the annexation of land adjacent to  the Santa Ana River), as well as a channelized portion of the Santa Ana River, the Project’s impacts  concerning Native American‐resources would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not  increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.     Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis. 3.18.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    At the time of the release of the Notice of Preparation for SEIR No. 332, CEQA Guidelines Appendix G did  not include environmental issues regarding tribal cultural resources.  Therefore, tribal cultural resources  were not evaluated in SEIR No. 332.  No impacts would occur and no mitigation is required.    Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    At the time of the release of the Notice of Preparation for SEIR No. 339, CEQA Guidelines Appendix G did  not include environmental issues regarding tribal cultural resources.  Therefore, tribal cultural resources  were not evaluated in SEIR No. 339.  No impacts would occur and no mitigation is required.      SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-97 Environmental Analysis 3.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS   Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?  b. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years?  c. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?  d Generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?  e. Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?    The SEIR No. 339 identified the following utility agencies that provide service within the PTMLUP area.     Wastewater Treatment and Collection (Anaheim Public Utilities Department);   Water Supply and Distribution Systems (Anaheim Public Utilities Department);   Solid Waste (Republic Waste Services of Southern California, LLC);   Electricity (Anaheim Public Utilities Department);   Natural Gas (Southern California Gas Company); and   Communications (Time Warner and AT&T).    a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 on pages 5.10‐22,  5.10‐27, 5.10‐33, 5.10‐34, and 5.10‐36 of SEIR No. 339.   SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-98 Environmental Analysis Previous Significance Determination:      WATER FACILITIES    SEIR No. 339 determined that buildout of the PTMLUP would require the addition of new water  facilities.  The SEIR determined that compliance with Rule 15‐D would ensure that adequate water  facilities are provided to serve the PTMLUP.  SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with new or expanded  water facilities to be less than significant with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 MMs 10‐1 through 10‐16.      WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES    SEIR No. 339 determined that buildout of the PTMLUP would require sewer improvements.  With  implementation of improvements, the sewer system, including sewer treatment, was anticipated to  accommodate development within the PTMLUP area based on future buildout conditions.  SEIR No.  339 found impacts associated with new or expanded wastewater treatment facilities to be less than  significant with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 MMs 10‐1 through 10‐16.      STORMWATER DRAINAGE FACILITIES    SEIR No. 339 noted that the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel  Tributary Area identified that the existing storm drainage system was deficient under the existing  conditions in the PTMLUP area at the time the SEIR was prepared.  SEIR No. 339 concluded that  construction of storm drain facilities would occur in compliance with the standard engineering rules  and regulations and would not result in a significant environmental effect.  Impacts associated with  stormwater drainage facilities were determined to be less than significant with incorporation of SEIR No.  339 MM 10‐17.    DRY UTILITIES    According to SEIR No. 339, the PTMLUP area receives electricity, natural gas, and telecommunication  services from APUD, Southern California Gas Company (SoCal Gas), and Time Warner and AT&T,  respectively.  SEIR No. 339 determined that project implementation would require the construction of  electricity, natural gas, and telecommunication facilities.  Impacts associated with dry utilities were  determined to be less than significant with incorporation of SEIR No. 332 MM 10‐21 through 10‐24 and  SERI No. 339 MM 10‐25 through 10‐27.     Project-Specific Analysis:      WATER FACILITIES    Due to the nature of the Project (roadway widening and annexation of land adjacent to the Santa Ana  River), Project implementation would not require or result in the construction of new water facilities or  expansion of existing facilities.  The Project does not propose landscaped medians or any other  component which would require water connections.  The Project would install a water line connection  within Orangewood Avenue to enhance the City of Orange’s existing water system.  The proposed water  line connection would provide redundancy should failure arise in other areas of the system and would  not involve a capacity increase which would require or result in the construction of new water facilities or  expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause an environmental effect.  No impact  would occur in this regard, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-99 Environmental Analysis WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES    Due to the nature of the Project (roadway widening and annexation of land adjacent to the Santa Ana  River), Project implementation would not require or result in the construction of new wastewater  treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities.  No impact would occur in this regard, and the level  of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    STORMWATER DRAINAGE FACILITIES    To accommodate widening of the Orangewood Avenue bridge crossing, an existing drainage facility  located at the eastern portion of the Santa Ana River would need to be relocated slightly north of the  existing location.  Roadway widening activities would also install curb, gutter, and storm drain  improvements along the affected segment of Orangewood Avenue.  Excluding the existing Santa Ana  River Trial drainage facility, all storm drain improvements would occur within the existing heavily  disturbed roadway right‐of‐way.  Any potentially significant effects resulting from the Project’s storm  drain improvements are analyzed in this Addendum and SEIR No. 339 and mitigated as appropriate.  Thus,  although the Project would involve the construction and relocation of stormwater drainage facilities,  construction itself would not result in a significant environmental effect.  Impacts would be less than  significant in this regard, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    DRY UTILITIES    As a roadway widening and annexation project, Project implementation would not increase demands on  natural gas and telecommunication facilities.  As a result, the Project would not require or result in the  relocation or construction of new or expanded electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications  facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects.  No  impacts would occur in this regard, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR  No. 339.    Santa Ana River Reorganization    The land uses associated with the annexation of land in the Santa Ana River area would be compatible  with the existing land uses in the Project vicinity The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning  Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River reorganization reflect anticipated future  development of these areas, but not a specific development project.  Any future development of the area  subject to the reorganization would be subject to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted  type and intensity of development would be similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339,  one can anticipate that the level of impact to water, wastewater treatment and stormwater drainage  facilities, as well as dry utilities, would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.      Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 page 5.10‐27.   SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-100 Environmental Analysis Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 determined that based on the Water Supply  Assessment for the PTMLUP, there would be surplus water through the 20‐year planning period.  The SEIR  impacts associated with water supplies to be less than significant with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 MMs  10‐7 through 10‐16.      Project-Specific Analysis:  As a roadway widening and annexation project, Project implementation  would not increase demands on existing water service facilities.  The Project does not entail a land use  which would require the provision or expansion of water services.  Although minimal, water may be used  for dust suppression purposes during Project construction; however, sufficient water supplies are  available to serve such purposes from existing entitlements and resources.  As discussed, the Project does  not propose landscaped medians or any other component which would require water connections.  The  Project would install a water line connection within Orangewood Avenue to enhance the City of Orange’s  existing water system.  The proposed water line connection would provide redundancy should failure  arise in other areas of the system and would not involve a capacity increase which would require new or  expanded water supply entitlements.  No impact would occur in this regard, and the level of impact would  not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana  River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would be subject  to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be  similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would  not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 determined that buildout of the PTMLUP  would require sewer improvements.  With implementation of improvements, the sewer system, including  sewer treatment, was anticipated to accommodate development within the PTMLUP area based on  future buildout conditions.  SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with wastewater treatment service  to be less than significant with the incorporation of SEIR No. 339 MMs 10‐1 through 10‐6.      Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to Response 3.18 (b).  As a roadway widening project, the proposed  improvements would not increase demand on existing wastewater treatment facilities. The proposed  amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana River  reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific development  project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would be subject to analysis  pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be similar to what  was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would not increase  from that identified in SEIR No. 339. Therefore, no impact would occur and the level of impact associated  with the proposed project would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-101 Environmental Analysis d) Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 on page 5.10‐33.   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 determined that the Olinda Alpha Landfill is the  closest facility to the PTMLUP area and would be the solid waste facility most often receiving waste  from the area.  Implementation of the PTMLUP would increase the service demand for solid waste disposal  beyond existing conditions and would provide more solid waste to the Olinda Alpha Landfill.  The SEIR  concluded that there would be available landfill capacity in the Orange County landfill system to  accommodate the anticipated solid waste stream generated by implementation of the PTMLUP.  SEIR No.  339 found impacts associated with landfill capacity to be less than significant with the incorporation of  SEIR No. 339 MMs 10‐18 through 10‐20.      Project-Specific Analysis:  The City of Anaheim disposes over 99 percent of the City’s solid waste at the  five landfills identified in Table 3.19‐1, Landfills Summary.  The five landfills serving Anaheim have a total  permitted capacity of approximately 7.2 million cubic yards plus an additional 45,554 tons per day  permitted capacity and a remaining capacity of approximately 4.4 million cubic yards.    Table 3.19‐1  Landfills Summary  Facility Amount Disposed from Anaheim in 20181 Permitted Throughput (tons/day)2 Permitted Capacity (cubic yards, unless otherwise noted)2 Remaining Capacity (cubic yards)2 Azusa Land Reclamation Co. Landfill 2,558 8,000 80,571,760 51,512,201 El Sobrante Landfill 3,809 16,054 209,910,000 143,977,170 Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill 12,439 11,500 266,000,000 205,000,000 H.M. Holloway Inc. 70,040 2,000 12,600,000 7,522,934 Olinda Alpha Sanitary Landfill 386,433 8,000 148,800,000 34,200,000 TOTAL 475,279 45,554 717,881,760 442,212,305 Note: 1. CalRecycle Website, Disposal Reporting System (DRS): Jurisdiction Disposal and Alternative Daily Cover (ADC) Tons by Facility, https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/DisposalReporting/Destination/DisposalByFacility, Accessed August 28, 2019. 2. Solid Waste Information System (SWIS), Integrated Waste Management Board, https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/swfacilities/Directory/19-AA- 0013/Index, Accessed August 28, 2019.   Project construction would involve limited amounts of demolition/excavation of existing materials and  soils which would require solid waste hauling.  The volume of existing materials and soils is not  anticipated to be substantially larger than that identified in SEIR No. 339 such that surrounding landfills  identified in Table 3.19‐1 would be overburdened by the Project’s solid waste disposal needs.  The  disposal of excavation and construction debris would be subject to compliance with all Federal, State,  and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste, including the 50 percent diversion of solid waste  requirement pursuant to the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939).  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-102 Environmental Analysis Pursuant to AB 939, the City of Anaheim and the City of Orange have each prepared a Source Reduction  and Recycling Element (SSRE).  Both cities implement their SRRE to ensure that their respective solid  waste reduction goals continue to be met.  The proposed Project would be required to comply with such  goals stipulated under each City’s SRRE for diverting solid waste, as applicable.  With incorporation of  applicable mitigation measures identified under SEIR No. 339, impacts concerning compliance with the  statutes and regulations in place relative to solid waste disposal would be less than significant, and the  level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana  River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would be subject  to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be  similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would  not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    d) Would the project comply with Federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste ?   This impact threshold was modified by the OPR in 2018.  The changes to this threshold of significance  consist of refinements and clarifications of existing requirements.  Although the specific language for this  threshold of significance has changed, the analysis was considered in the SEIR No. 339 on page 5.10‐33  of SEIR No. 339.   Previous Significance Determination:  SEIR No. 339 concluded that implementation of the PTMLUP  would generate increased construction and operational solid waste in the area, so therefore each  development project in the PTMLUP area would be required to submit project plans to the Streets  and Sanitation Division of the Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans  comply with the Solid Waste Act of 1989 (AB 939) and the County of Orange and the City of Anaheim  Integrated Waste Management Program, as administered by the City of Anaheim. SEIR No. 339 found  impacts associated with solid waste statutes and regulations to be less than significant with  incorporation of SEIR No. 339 MMs 10‐18 through 10‐20.      Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to Response 3.19 (d).  Project construction would be subject to  conformance with the City of Anaheim and City of Orange’s adopted construction and solid waste  disposal programs and well as applicable Federal, State, and local regulations concerning solid waste.  A  less than significant impact would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified  in SEIR No. 339.    The proposed amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map and PTMLUP associated with the Santa Ana  River reorganization reflect anticipated future development of these areas, but not a specific  development project.  Any future development of the area subject to the reorganization would be subject  to analysis pursuant to CEQA. Given that the permitted type and intensity of development would be  similar to what was previously‐analyzed by SEIR No. 339, one can anticipate that the level of impact would  not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339.    Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-103 Environmental Analysis 3.19.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    Refer to the Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339 below, which are based on adopted Mitigation  Measures from SEIR No. 332.     Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 includes measures to reduce potential impacts associated the development and  infrastructure improvements within the Platinum Triangle.  The following mitigation measures are  applicable.15  Any modifications to the original measures are shown in strikethrough for deleted text and  new, inserted text is underlined.    MM 10‐2 Prior to the approval and ongoing during construction of any street improvement plans  within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass area(s) where Orange County Sanitation  District (OCSD) will be upsizing trunk lines and/or are making other improvements, the  City of Anaheim and/or property owner/developer shall coordinate with the OCSD to  ensure that all improvements and construction schedules are coordinated.    MM 10‐5 Prior to the approval and ongoing during construction of any street improvement plans  within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass area(s) where the Orange County Sanitation  District (OCSD) will be upsizing trunk lines and/or are making other improvements, the City  of Anaheim and/or property owner shall coordinate with OCSD to ensure that backflow  prevention devices are installed at the lateral connections to prevent surcharge flow from  entering private properties.    MM 10‐18 Prior to the final building and zoning inspections of each development, the property  owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the  Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the Public Works  Department, Development Services Division shall confirm all plans submitted during Plans,  Specifications, and Estimate phase comply with AB939, and the Solid Waste Reduction Act of  1989, and the County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans  as administered by the City of Anaheim.  Implementation of said plan shall commence upon  occupancy and shall remain in full effect as required by the Street and Sanitation Division and  may include, at its discretion, the following plan components:       Detailing the locations and design of on‐site recycling facilities.   Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim” program or other substitute  program as may be developed by the City or governing agency.   Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by providing adequate space  and centralized locations for collection and bailing.   Providing trash compactors for nonrecyclable materials whenever feasible to reduce the  total volume of solid waste and number of trips required for collection.   Providing on‐site recycling receptacles accessible to the public to encourage recycling for  all businesses, employees, and patrons where feasible.    15 Mitigation measure numbering corresponds to Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan Appendix C, Updated and  Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program Number 106C.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-104 Environmental Analysis  Prohibiting curbside pick‐up.   Ensuring hazardous materials disposal complies with Federal, State, and city regulations.           SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-105 Environmental Analysis 3.20 WILDFIRE SEIR No. 339 did not evaluate as it was not required in the CEQA Guidelines at the time SEIR No. 339 was  prepared.    On October 26, 2010, the City of Anaheim certified the SEIR No. 339 that analyzed the potential impacts  associated with development of the revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project.  Although this previous  environmental document did not include a specific wildfire analysis, a supplemental environmental  analysis of wildfire impacts cannot be required absent new information on that front.  The implementation  of project design features and mitigation measures related to wildfire have typically been incorporated  into hazard and hazardous materials analysis.  Thus, the effect of wildfires would have been raised in 2010  when the City considered the EIR.  A challenge to an EIR must be brought within 30 days of the lead  agency’s notice of approval.  (Pub. Resources Code, § 21167[b].)  Under Public Resources Code Section  21166(c), an agency may not require a supplemental environmental review unless new information, which  was not known and could not have been known at the time the EIR was approved, becomes available.   After a project has been subjected to environmental review, the statutory presumption flips in favor of  the project proponent and against further review.  (Moss v. County of Humboldt [2008] 162 Cal.App.4th  1041, 1049‐1050.)  “‘[S]ection 21166 comes into play precisely because in‐depth review has already  occurred [and] the time for challenging the sufficiency of the original EIR has long since expired.’”  (Id.,  1050.)  There is no competent evidence of new information of severe impact, and thus the City may rely  on an addendum.  Accordingly, the City finds that wildfire is not “new information” under Public Resources  Code Section 21166.    If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?  b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?  c. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?  d. Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?    a) Would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?   Previous Significance Determination:  The Initial Study for SEIR No. 339 concluded that PTMLUP  buildout would not expose people or structures to significant risk of loss, injury or death involving  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-106 Environmental Analysis wildland fires since the PTMLUP area is developed and no undeveloped wildland areas are in or adjacent  to the PTMLUP area.  Because there were no impacts, they were not further analyzed in SEIR No. 339.    Project-Specific Analysis:  The Project Site is not located within or near a State responsibility area.   According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection’s Very High Fire Hazard Severity  Zones in LRA Map for Anaheim, the Project Site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity  Zone.16  No impacts would occur in this regard.       Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, would the project exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?   Previous Significance Determination:  Refer to Response 3.20(a).      Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to Response 3.20(a).  No impact would occur.      Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    c) Would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?   Previous Significance Determination:  Refer to Response 3.20(a).        Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to Response 3.20(a).  No impact would occur.      Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    d) Would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?   Previous Significance Determination:   Refer to Response 3.20(a).        Project-Specific Analysis:  Refer to Response 3.20(a).  No impact would occur.     Significance Determination:  No substantial increase in the level of impact from previous analysis.    3.20.1 MITIGATION PROGRAM   Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 332    SEIR No. 332 does not include mitigation measures for wildfire.    16   California Department of Forestry and Fire Resources, Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA Map for Anaheim,  October 2011.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-107 Environmental Analysis Mitigation Measures from SEIR No. 339    SEIR No. 339 does not include mitigation measures for wildfire. SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-108 Environmental Analysis This page intentionally left blank. SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-109 Environmental Analysis 3.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE   Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?  b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?  c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?    a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?   No substantial change from previous analysis.  As concluded in Section 3.1 through 3.20 of this  Addendum, Project implementation would not degrade the quality of the environment.  Project  implementation would not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or  wildlife population to drop below self‐sustaining levels, or reduce the number or restrict the range of a  rare or endangered plant or animal beyond the level of impact as previously analyzed in SEIR No. 339;  refer to Section 3.5, Cultural Resources.  As indicated in Section 3.5, the Project Site (a segment of  Orangewood Avenue and the Santa Ana River reorganization area) does not contain important examples  of the major periods of California history or prehistory.  In addition, no additional information of  substantial importance concerning these issue areas has been discovered since SEIR No. 339  certification.  Therefore, Project implementation would not result in any new impacts or increase the  severity of impacts previously identified by SEIR No. 339, and no substantial change would occur.     b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?   SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 3-110 Environmental Analysis No substantial change from previous analysis.  SEIR No. 339 concluded that implementation of  the PTMLUP would result in significant and unavoidable cumulative impacts to air quality, and a  Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City of Anaheim.  The Project involves a  limited footprint that generally aligns with existing Orangewood Avenue roadway right‐of‐way and the  Santa Ana River reorganization area.  Based on the Project Site’s disturbed conditions, it is not anticipated  that Project implementation would result in any new cumulative impacts or increase the severity of a  previously identified significant cumulative impact as previously identified by SEIR No. 339, and no  substantial change would occur.     c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?   No substantial change from previous analysis.  The Project would not result in environmental effects  which would cause a direct or indirect effect on human beings, following conformance with existing SEIR  No. 339 mitigation measures and the established regulatory framework.  Based on the nature of the  proposed improvements, Project implementation would not result in any new impacts or increase the  severity of previously identified significant impacts as previously identified by SEIR No. 339, and no  substantial change would occur.     SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 4-1 References 4.0 REFERENCES    California Department of Conservation, Agricultural Preserves 2004 (Williamson Act Parcels Orange  County, California), 2004.     California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, Orange County  Important Farmland 2012, January 2015.    California Department of Conservation, Seismic Hazard Zone Map for the Anaheim Quadrangle, Released  April 15, 1998.    California Department of Forestry and Fire Resources, Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA Map  for Anaheim, October 2011.    California Department of Transportation Website, California Scenic Highway Mapping System,  http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/index.htm, Accessed October  11, 2017.    California Department of Transportation, Caltrans Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise  Analysis Protocol, September 2013.    California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation  Impacts in CEQA, dated April 16, 2018.    CalRecycle Website, Disposal Reporting System (DRS): Jurisdiction Disposal and Alternative Daily Cover  (ADC) Tons by Facility,  https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/DisposalReporting/Destination/Disposal ByFacility,  Accessed August 28, 2019.    City of Anaheim, Anaheim General Plan, 2004.    City of Anaheim, Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Environmental Impact Report No. 330  (SCH #2003041105), 2004.    City of Anaheim, Anaheim Municipal Code, current through August 2017.     City of Anaheim, Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2015.    City of Anaheim, The Platinum Triangle Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 332 (SCH No.  2004121045), May 2005.    City of Anaheim, The Platinum Triangle Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 332 (SCH No.  2004121045), August 2005.    City of Anaheim, The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, Updated 2014.    City of Anaheim, The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact  Report No. 339 (SCH #2004121045), 2010.  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 4-2 References   City of Anaheim, The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent Environmental Impact  Report No. 339 (SCH #2004121045), 2010.    City of Orange, Multi‐Hazard Functional Plan, n.d.    City of Orange, City of Orange General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2006031117),  2010.    City of Orange, Orange General Plan, 2010.     City of Orange, Orange Municipal Code, current through May 2017.    Federal Emergency Management Agency Website, FEMA Zone Definitions,  http://www.floodadvocate.com/fema‐zone‐ definitions/?gclid=CjwKEAjw4vzKBRCt9Zmg8f2blgESJADN5fDgTspDzPxBH5dp9mar2pUN_suNf1cjN8 Rj8Vko6HTHHxoCzGz w_wcB, Accessed October 4, 2017.    Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA‐HEP‐05‐054), January 2006.    LSA Associates, Inc., Platinum Center in City of Anaheim Traffic Study, August 2016.    Michael Baker International, Jurisdictional Delineation for the Orangewood Avenue Bridge Widening Over  Santa Ana River in the City of Orange, California, January 22, 2018.    Michael Baker International, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the Orangewood Avenue  Improvements Project located in the Cities of Anaheim and Orange, California, October 2017.    Michael Baker International, Results of a Biological Resources Assessment for the Orangewood Avenue  Bridge Widening Over Santa Ana River in the City of Orange, California, September 28, 2017.    Michael Baker International, Traffic Analysis for the SR‐57 Ramps at Orangewood Avenue Memorandum,  June 2017.    Orange County Transportation Authority, 2015 Orange County Congestion Management Program, Figure  4: CMP Level of Service Chart, November 2015.     Orange County Transportation Authority, Draft 2017 Orange County Congestion Management Program,  Figure 4: 2017 CMP Level of Service Chart, September 2017.    Solid Waste Information System (SWIS), Integrated Waste Management Board,  https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/swfacilities/Directory/19‐AA‐0013/Index, Accessed August 28, 2019.    South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan, March 2017.    Southern California Association of Governments, 2016‐2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable  Communities Strategy, April 2016. SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 5-1 Preparers and Contributors 5.0 PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORS   City of Anaheim (Lead Agency)  Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division  200 South Anaheim Boulevard  Anaheim, California 92805    Andy Uk, Associate Planner  Charles M. Guiam, Planner   Carlos Castellanos, City Engineer  Cesar Carrillo, Principal Civil Engineer    Michael Baker International (Environmental Consultant)  5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500  Santa Ana, California 92707    Alan Ashimine, Project Manager  Kristen Bogue, Senior Environmental Analyst/Hazardous Materials Specialist  Frances Yau, Environmental Analyst  Alicia Gonzalez, Environmental Analyst  Winnie Woo, Environmental Analyst  Marc Violett, Traffic Engineer  Rich Beck, Regulatory Task Manager  Josephine Lim, Regulatory Analyst  Danielle Regimbal, Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Noise Specialist         SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 5-2 Preparers and Contributors This page intentionally left blank.      SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 6-1 Acronyms and Abbreviations 6.0 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS   Acronym/Abbreviation Definition ADA Americans with Disabilities Act ADL Aerially‐deposited lead AFD Anaheim Fire Department ALUC Airport Land Use Commission APD Anaheim Police Department APN Assessor parcel number AQMP Air Quality Management Plan ATAM Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BMP best management practice CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model Caltrans California Department of Transportation CARB California Air Resources Board CAT Climate Action Team CBC California Building Code CCR California Code of Regulations CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CH4 Methane City City of Anaheim CMP Congestion Management Plan CNEL community noise equivalent level CO carbon monoxide CO2 carbon dioxide CO2E carbon dioxide equivalent DAMP Drainage Area Management Plan dBA A‐weighted decibel DMA drainage management areas EIR environmental impact report ESA Environmental Site Assessment FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency GHG greenhouse gas GPF gallons per flush gsf gross square feet GWP Global warming potential SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 6-2 Acronyms and Abbreviations Acronym/Abbreviation Definition HCP Habitat Conservation Plan HVAC heating, ventilation, and air conditioning  I‐5 Interstate 5  ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization  lbs/day pounds per day  LED Light‐emitting diode  LOS level of service  LST localized significance threshold  LUST leaking underground storage tank  MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act  MLD most likely descendent  MM Mitigation Measure  MMRP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program  MPAH Master Plan of Arterial Highways  mph miles per hour  MRZ Mineral Resource Zone  msl mean sea level  MT metric ton  MMT million metric tons  N2O nitrous oxide  NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards  NAHC Native American Heritage Commission  NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plan  NO2 nitrogen dioxide  NOx oxides of nitrogen  NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System  O3 ozone  OCSD Orange County Sanitation District  OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority  OCWD Orange County Water District  PEC Potential environmental condition  PM10 particulate matter less than or equal to 10 micrometers in diameter  PM2.5 particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 microns in diameter  ppm parts per million  PRC Public Resources Code  PTIP Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan  PTMLUP Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan  PTMU Platinum Triangle Mixed Use  REC recognized environmental condition  SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 6-3 Acronyms and Abbreviations Acronym/Abbreviation Definition RTP Regional Transportation Plan  SARI Santa Ana River Interceptor SCAB South Coast Air Basin SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy SEIR Subsequent Environmental Impact Report SEMS Standardized Emergency Management System sf square feet SR State Route SRA Source Receptor Area SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan UCI University of California, Irvine USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service UST underground storage tank VAV Variable air volume VPH Vehicles per hour VOCs volatile organic compounds WQMP Water Quality Management Plan      SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Orangewood Avenue Improvements   Final | November 2021 6-4 Acronyms and Abbreviations This page intentionally left blank.    APPENDIX A Biological Resources Assessment This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. September 28, 2017 Rafael Contreras City of Anaheim 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 276 Anaheim, CA 92805 SUBJECT: Results of a Biological Resources Assessment for the Orangewood Avenue Bridge Widening Over Santa Ana River in the City of Orange, California. Dear Mr. Contreras: Michael Baker International (Michael Baker) has prepared this letter report to document the results of a biological resources site assessment for the Orangewood Avenue Bridge Widening Over Santa Ana River. Methods Prior to the site visit, Michael Baker conducted a 4-quadrangle records search of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) RareFind 5 and the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants. Other sources included the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS) Critical Habitat online mapper, U.S. Department of Agriculture/Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA/NRCS) Web Soil Survey, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 100-Year Flood Zones, and USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps online. On September 13, 2017, between the hours of 7:45 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., Michael Baker biologists Linda Nguyen and Stephen Anderson conducted a biological resources site assessment. Weather conditions consisted of overcast skies, and a temperature ranging between approximately 65 to 70 degrees Fahrenheit. The survey was conducted by walking around the project site documenting all plant and wildlife species observed (Attachment 1) and photographing existing site conditions (Exhibit 4). The area of study included 100 feet upstream and downstream of the Orangewood Avenue bridge. Results The project area consists of the Santa Ana River that conveys perennial flows from north to south. To the east of the Santa Ana River, the State Route 57 (SR-57) runs north and south. East and southwest of the project boundary consists of existing residential and commercial developments. The Angel Stadium property is located directly west of the Santa Ana River. Soils mapped by the USDA/NRCS within the project boundary consist of Hueneme fine sandy loam, drained (158); Metz loamy sand, moderately fine substratum (164), and Riverwash (191). The Santa Ana River is sand-bottomed, regularly maintained, and was void of vegetation communities. Minimal vegetation was present along the sediment of the river bed including common knotweed (Persicaria lapathifolia), castor bean (Ricinus communis), rough cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), and white sweetclover (Melilotus albus). The disturbed banks primarily contained sugar bush (Rhus ovata), California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), Hottentot fig (Carpobrotus edulis), Russian thistle (Salsola tragus), and bush sunflower (Encelia californica). A complete list of plants and wildlife species observed during the survey is provided in Attachment 1. The NWI identifies the Santa Ana River as Lake. The FEMA maps indicate that the Santa Ana River is located in Zone A, areas subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event, with the surrounding areas within the project site designated as Zone X, an area with reduced risk due to levee. The Santa Ana River was observed with no surface flows at the time of the visit. The ordinary high water mark (OHWM), which is used to identify the non-wetland waters of the U.S. limits subject to jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) pursuant to the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) Sections 404 and 401, respectively, varied between approximately 255 to 265 feet wide. Streambed and active banks subject to CDFW jurisdiction pursuant to the California Fish and Game Code Sections 1600 et seq. averaged approximately 300 feet wide to the top of banks. No special-status plant or wildlife species were observed on-site. Based on the records search, a total of four (4) special-status plant species and eighteen (18) special-status wildlife species have been recorded within the vicinity of the project by the CNDDB and CNPS online inventory. Most of these species have a low potential or are not expected to occur on-site due to a lack of habitat suitable to support them. There is a potential for various special-status species to occur within the project site, including, but not limited to, American peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus anatum), coast horned lizard (Phrynosoma blainvillii), whiptails (Aspidoscelis spp.), Swainson's hawk (Buteo swainsoni), and bats (Order Chiroptera). Of the twenty-two (22) species, the records search includes two (2) wildlife species that are listed under the Federal Endangered Species Act and/or the California Endangered Species Act warranting protection from take. Due to the disturbed nature of the site and a lack of suitable habitat, none of the listed species known to occur within the vicinity of the project area are expected to occur on-site. Further, the project area is not located within mapped USFWS-designated Critical Habitat. Recommendations It is highly recommended that the delineation results be forwarded to each of the regulatory agencies for their concurrence. The concurrence/receipt would be valid up to five years and would solidify findings noted within this report. Please contact me at (949) 472-3436 or at linda.nguyen@mbakerintl.com with any questions you may have regarding this project. Sincerely, Linda Nguyen Biologist/Regulatory Analyst Natural Resources/Regulatory Permitting Attachment 1: Plant and Wildlife Species Observed List Orangewood Avenue Improvements from the Santa Ana River to the East of SR-57 Project Biological Resources Assessment Attachment 1: Plant and Wildlife Species Observed List Scientific Name* Common Name Plants Carpobrotus edulis Hottentot fig Encelia californica bush sunflower Eriogonum fasciculatum California buckwheat Melilotus albus white sweetclover Persicaria ssp. Persicaria Rhus ovata sugarbush Ricinus communis castor bean Salsola tragus Russian thistle Xanthium strumarium Rough cocklebur Birds Buteo jamaicensis red-tailed hawk Columba livia rock dove Corvus brachyrhynchos American crow APPENDIX B Jurisdictional Delineation This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. January 22, 2018 Rafael Contreras City of Anaheim 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 276 Anaheim, CA 92805 Subject: Jurisdictional Delineation for the Orangewood Avenue Bridge Widening Over Santa Ana River in the City of Orange, California. Dear Mr. Contreras: Michael Baker International (Michael Baker) has prepared this letter report to document the results of a jurisdictional delineation that has been prepared for the City of Anaheim, in order to delineate the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (Corps), San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (Regional Board), and California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (CDFW) jurisdictional authority located within the Orangewood Avenue Bridge Widening Over Santa Ana River (project site). The field work for this delineation was conducted on September 13, 2017. Project Description The City proposes to widen Orangewood Avenue from a four‐lane roadway to a six‐lane divided facility to provide expanded vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian access. The project would incorporate an additional through lane in each direction of travel through the project site boundaries. To widen the roadway, the project would widen the existing Orangewood Avenue bridge structure over the Santa Ana River. Bridge widening improvements would involve widening the bridge an additional 30-35 feet to accommodate the proposed six travel lanes and associated sidewalk. Five (5) existing bents will be lengthened for the widening. The bents are situated along the River bottom. The proposed total bridge length would be 348 feet, six inches. In addition, to accommodate the proposed roadway widening, improvements within existing Caltrans right-of- way (associated with the SR-57/Orangewood Avenue interchange) would include a Caltrans- standard type 1 retaining wall up to eight feet in height along the northern side of Orangewood Avenue. Jurisdictional impacts associated with bridge widening over the Santa Ana River would result in 0.03-acre of permanent impacts and 1.12-acre of temporary impacts to CDFW unvegetated streambed. Site Conditions Santa Ana River traverses under the Orangewood Avenue Bridge in north to south direction. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) ranged from 255 to 265 feet in width and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW ) jurisdictional streambed ranged from approximately 300 feet in width. Water flow was not noted within the channel during the site visit. No wetland features were noted onsite during the site visit. Recommendations Please note that based on a detailed review of the current site conditions and proposed project, our research has indicated that it will be necessary for City of Anaheim to successfully obtain the following permits should construction activities occur within State and Federal jurisdictional areas: Corps Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14- Linear Transportation Projects, Regional Board Section 401 Water Quality Certification and CDFW 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement. Please contact me at (949) 855-3687 or at RBECK@mbakerintl.com with any questions you may have regarding this project. Sincerely, Richard Beck Regulatory Task Manager Natural Resources/Regulatory Permitting APPENDIX C Phase I Environmental Site Assessment This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Orangewood Avenue Improvements Cities of Anaheim and Orange State of California Prepared in General Accordance with: ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments For: City of Anaheim Public Works Department 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 Attn: Rafael Contreras, P.E. By: 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 Santa Ana, California 92707 October 2017 JN 159416 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 | Santa Ana, CA 92707 Office: 949.472.3505 | Fax: 949.837.4122 October 12, 2017 159416 City of Anaheim Public Works Department 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 SUBJECT: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the Orangewood Avenue Improvements Project located in the Cities of Anaheim Orange, California. Dear Rafael Contreras, Michael Baker International (Michael Baker), is pleased to submit this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the above referenced project, herein referenced as the “subject site.” The goal of this Phase I ESA is to identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) associated with the subject site. This Phase I ESA has been prepared for the sole use of City of Anaheim, for the above-referenced subject site. Neither this Phase I ESA, nor any of the information contained herein, shall be used or relied upon for any purpose by any person or entity other than City of Anaheim. The Phase I ESA was prepared using methods consistent with the ASTM International (ASTM) E 1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments, the scope of services, and inherent limitations presented in our proposal. The Phase I ESA is not intended to present specific quantitative information as to the actual presence of hazardous substances on or adjacent to the subject site, but is to identify RECs based on available information. Should you or your staff have any questions or concerns after reviewing the enclosed report, please do not hesitate to contact me at 949/855-5747. Sincerely, Kristen Bogue Environmental Professional Planning/Environmental Services STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL I [We] declare that, to the best of my [our] professional knowledge and belief, I[we] meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 312 and I[we] have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I[we] have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. ___________________________________ Signature of Michael Baker Environmental Professional Kristen Bogue Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | i TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. E-1 Section 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Purpose .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Detailed Scope of Services .............................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Significant Assumptions ................................................................................. 1-2 1.4 Limitations, Deviations, and Exceptions ...................................................... 1-2 1.5 User Responsibilities .................................................................................. 1-3 1.6 Special Terms and Conditions ....................................................................... 1-6 1.7 User Reliance .................................................................................................... 1-6 Section 2.0 User Provided Information ........................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Previous Documents ........................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Litigation/Administrative Proceedings ....................................................... 2-2 2.3 Governmental Notices..................................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Environmental Liens ....................................................................................... 2-2 2.5 Activity and Use Limitations ......................................................................... 2-2 2.6 Specialized Knowledge or Experience .......................................................... 2-2 2.7 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information ................. 2-2 2.8 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ........................................... 2-3 2.9 Degree of Obviousness .................................................................................... 2-3 2.10 Reason for Performing Phase I ....................................................................... 2-3 Section 3.0 Records Review ............................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Physical Setting Sources .................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Standard Environmental Records Sources ................................................... 3-8 3.3 File Record Reviews ...................................................................................... 3-14 3.4 Historical Use Information on the Subject Site and Adjoining Properties ......................................................... 3-15 Section 4.0 Site Reconnaissance .................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions ........................................................ 4-1 4.2 On-Site Observations ....................................................................................... 4-1 4.3 Off-Site Observations ...................................................................................... 4-6 Table of Contents Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | ii Section 5.0 Interviews ...................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Property Owner ............................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Key Site Manager/Operator ........................................................................... 5-1 5.3 Occupants .......................................................................................................... 5-1 5.4 Local Government Officials ............................................................................ 5-2 5.5 Other Persons ................................................................................................... 5-2 Section 6.0 Evaluation ...................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Findings and Opinions .................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 6-6 6.3 Limiting Conditions/Deviations ................................................................... 6-7 Section 7.0 References ..................................................................................................................... 7-1 List of Exhibits 1. Regional Vicinity .............................................................................................. 3-2 2. Site Vicinity ....................................................................................................... 3-3 3. Subject Site ........................................................................................................ 3-4 4. Overview Map .................................................................................................. 3-9 5. On-Site Photographs ....................................................................................... 4-2 6. Off-Site Photographs ....................................................................................... 4-3 List of Tables 1-1. Groundwater Plume Dimension Assumptions ........................................... 1-2 3-1. Database Summaries ..................................................................................... 3-10 3-2. Identified Regulatory Sites of Concern ....................................................... 3-11 3-3. Historical Uses Summary ............................................................................. 3-18 Appendices Appendix A: ASTM Terminology Appendix B: Database Records Searches Appendix C: Documentation Appendix D: Qualifications of the Environmental Professional Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | iii LIST OF ACRONYMS ACM Asbestos Containing Materials APN Assessor’s Parcel Number AST Aboveground Storage Tank ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry AULs Activity and Use Limitations CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (maintained by the Environmental Protection Agency) CFR Code of Federal Regulations CORRACTS facilities subject to Corrective Action under RCRA CPSC United States Consumer Product Safety Commission DDD Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane DDE Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene DDT Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane DOGGR California Department of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control EDR Environmental Data Resources EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency EPCRA Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (also known as SARA Title III), 42 U.S.C. §§11001-11050 et seq.) ERNS emergency response notification system ESA Environmental Site Assessment FOIA U.S. Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. §552 as amended by Public Law No. 104-231, 110 Stat.) FR Federal Register HREC Historical Recognized Environmental Condition ICs Institutional Controls LBP Lead Based Paints LUFT Leaking Underground Fuel Tank LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank MSDS Material Safety Data Sheet msl Mean sea level NCP National Contingency Plan NFRAP former CERCLIS sites where no further remedial action is planned under CERCLA NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPL National Priorities List Acronyms Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | iv PCBs Polychlorinated Biphenyls REC Recognized Environmental Condition RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§6901 et seq.) RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SBBM San Bernardino Base and Meridian SCS Soil Conservation Service TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons TRI Toxics Release Inventory TSDF hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility USDA United States Department of Agriculture USGS United States Geological Survey UST Underground Storage Tank Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | E-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Michael Baker has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM International (ASTM) E 1527-13 Standard Practice of the Orangewood Avenue Improvements, located in the cities of Anaheim and Orange, Orange County, California, the subject site. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.0, Introduction, of this Phase I ESA. This Phase I ESA has revealed the following evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the subject site:  Aerially Deposited Lead: Based on historical aerial photographs and United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps, SR-57 was constructed in 1977. The potential for lead contamination to exist within exposed soils on-site due to aerially deposited lead is likely. It is Michael Baker’s opinion that there is a REC on the subject site as a result of aerially deposited lead.  Groundwater Contamination: The adjacent property located at 2023 Collins Street (approximately 2,420 feet up gradient of the subject site) was found to have groundwater contamination extending to a maximum distance of 6,500 feet down gradient, which includes the subject site and areas of propose right-of-way (ROW) acquisition. As such, it is the opinion of Michael Baker that a REC has resulted via groundwater from the adjacent regulatory property located at 2023 Collins Street. It is acknowledged that groundwater is anticipated to be greater than 80 feet below ground surface. Section 6.1, Findings and Opinions, documents Michael Baker’s findings and opinions as to whether or not a REC (or Conditional Recognized Environmental Condition [CREC]) is present at the subject site. Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 1-1 SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of conducting this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) is to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) as defined by the ASTM International (ASTM) E 1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (Standard Practice). The ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice defines the term REC as “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. De minimis conditions are not RECs.” This Phase I ESA was conducted in accordance with the ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice and satisfies the requirements of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 312 titled Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries, as required under Section 101(35)(B)(ii) and (iii) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). The purpose of conducting an All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) investigation into the previous ownership and uses of a property is to meet the provisions necessary for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser to qualify for certain landowner liability protections under CERCLA. To assist in understanding the terminology contained in this Phase I ESA, a glossary of terms associated with the ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice is provided in Appendix A, ASTM Terminology. 1.2 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES This scope of work follows the ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice. The ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice outlines a procedure for completing Phase I ESAs that includes review of Federal, tribal, State, and local government records; site reconnaissance; interviews with current owners, operators, occupants, and government officials; and report preparation. This practice does not include any testing or sampling of materials (for example, soil, water, air, building materials, etc.). This Phase I ESA is not intended to provide specific qualitative or quantitative information as to the actual presence of hazardous substances at the subject site, but is to merely identify the potential presence based on available information. Section 1.0 | Introduction Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 1-2 1.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS Unless stated otherwise in this Phase I ESA, Michael Baker assumes that groundwater flow follows the topography of the subject site. In lieu of reasonably available public information pertaining to groundwater contamination, Michael Baker assumes that groundwater plume dimensions are within the 90th percentile of plumes determined by research conducted as part of ASTM E 2600-10 Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in real Estate Transactions, which described in detail in Table 1-1, Groundwater Plume Dimension Assumptions. Table 1-1 Groundwater Plume Dimension Assumptions Chemical Contamination Length of Plume Up- Gradient From Source Length of Plume Down- Gradient from Source Maximum Width of Plume From Source Chemical of Concern 100 feet 1,760 feet 365 feet Petroleum Hydrocarbon Chemical of Concern With Free Product 100 feet 528 feet 165 feet Dissolved 100 feet 528 feet 95 feet Notes: These dimension assumptions are based on research conducted as part of ASTM E 2600-10 Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in real Estate Transactions, which has determined that 90 percent of plumes are these dimensions or less. Source: Anthony J. Buonicore, Methodology for Identifying the Area of Concern Around a Property Potentially Impacted by Vapor Migration from Nearby Contaminated Sources, Paper 2011-A-301-AWMA, June 2011. 1.4 LIMITATIONS, DEVIATIONS, AND EXCEPTIONS No interviews with current/past property owners or local government officials were conducted. Based on available information reviewed as part of this Phase I ESA, past and current on-site uses appeared to historically consist of the Santa Ana River, past agricultural uses, and transportation uses. No evidence to suggest other uses was noted. Based on the historical documentation reviewed, it is Michael Baker’s opinion that these interviews would not increase the knowledge of the Environmental Professional such that the conclusions of this Phase I ESA would change. Thus, it is the opinion of Michael Baker that this deviation is not a significant data gap. No additional scope items, or items outside of the scope of a Phase I ESA E 1527-13 Standard Practice, were conducted as part of this Phase I ESA. Section 1.0 | Introduction Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 1-3 1.5 USER RESPONSIBILITIES This Phase I ESA does not satisfy continuing obligations under CERCLA liability protections provided for innocent landowners, bona fide prospective purchasers, and contiguous property owners, which includes, but is not limited to, duties required after property acquisition (i.e., compliance with land use restrictions and institutional controls, undertaking “reasonable steps” with respect to hazardous substances releases, compliance with other obligations such as reporting obligations and information requests, etc.). ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice defines the user as “the party seeking to use Practice E 1527 to complete an environmental site assessment of the property. A user may include, without limitation, a potential purchaser of property, a potential tenant of property, an owner of property, a lender, or a property manager.” The purpose of this section is to describe tasks to be performed by the user that will help identify the possibility of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject site. These tasks do not require the technical expertise of an environmental professional and are not required to be performed by environmental professional performing a Phase I ESA. It should be noted that the following tasks are required, by the user of this Phase I ESA, to satisfy the requirements of conducting all appropriate inquiries. 1.5.1 REVIEW TITLE AND JUDICIAL RECORDS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS (AULS) To meet the requirements of 40 CFR 312.20 and 312.25, a search for the existence of environmental liens and AULs that are filed or recorded against the property must be conducted. Environmental liens and AULs are legally distinct instruments and have very different purposes and both can commonly be found within recorded land title records (e.g., County Recorder/Registry of Deeds). The types of title reports that may disclose environmental liens and AULs include Preliminary Title Reports, Title Commitments, Condition of Title, and Title Abstracts. Chain of title reports will not normally disclose environmental liens or AULs. Environmental liens and AULs that are imposed by judicial authorities may be recorded or filed in judicial records only. In jurisdictions where environmental liens or AULs are only recorded or filed in judicial records, the judicial records must be searched for environmental liens and AULs. Any environmental liens and AULs known to the user should be reported to the environmental professional conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Unless added by a change in the scope of work to be performed by the environmental professional (refer to Section 1.4, Limitations, Deviations, and Exceptions), this practice does not impose on the environmental professional the responsibility to undertake a review of recorded land title records and judicial records for environmental liens or activity and use limitations. The user should either (1) engage a title company or title professional to Section 1.0 | Introduction Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 1-4 undertake a review of reasonably ascertainable recorded land title records and lien records for environmental liens or activity and use limitations currently recorded against or relating to the property, or (2) negotiate such an engagement of a title company or title professional as an addition to the scope of work to be performed by the environmental professional. 1.5.1.1 Reasonably Ascertainable Title and Judicial Records for Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations Environmental liens and AULs that are recorded or filed in any place other than recorded land title records are not considered to be reasonably ascertainable unless applicable Federal, tribal, State, or local statues, or regulations specify a place other than recorded land title records for recording or filing of environmental liens and AULs. 1.5.2 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE OR EXPERIENCE OF THE USER Users must take into account their specialized knowledge to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases. If the user has any specialized knowledge or experience that is material to RECs in connection with the property, the user should communicate any information based on such specialized knowledge or experience to the environmental professional. The user should do so before the environmental professional conducts the site reconnaissance. 1.5.3 ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE USER If the user has actual knowledge of any environmental lien or AULs encumbering the property or in connection with the property, the user should communicate such information to the environmental professional. The user should do so before the environmental professional conducts the site reconnaissance. 1.5.4 REASON FOR SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER PURCHASE PRICE In a transaction involving the purchase of a parcel of commercial real estate, the user shall consider the relationship of the purchase price of the property to the fair market value of the property if the property was not affected by hazardous substances or petroleum products. The user should try to identify an explanation for a lower price which does not reasonably reflect fair market value if the property were not contaminated, and make a written record of such explanation. Among the factors to consider will be the information that becomes known to the user pursuant to the Phase I ESA. The ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice does not require that a real estate appraisal be obtained in order to ascertain fair market value of the property. The user should inform the environmental professional if the user believes that the purchase price of the Section 1.0 | Introduction Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 1-5 property is lower than the fair market value due to contamination. The user is not required to disclose the purchase price to the environmental professional. 1.5.5 COMMONLY KNOWN OR REASONABLY ASCERTAINABLE INFORMATION Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information within the local community about the property must be taken into account by the user. If the user is aware of any commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information within the local community about the property that is material to recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property, the user should communicate such information to the environmental professional. The user should do so before the environmental professional conducts the site reconnaissance. The user must gather such information to the extent necessary to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products. 1.5.6 DEGREE OF OBVIOUSNESS The user must consider the degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of releases or threatened releases at the property and the ability to detect releases or threatened releases by appropriate investigation including the information collected under the following sections within this Phase I ESA:  Section 1.5.1, Review Title and Judicial Records for Environmental Liens and Activity and Use Limitations (AULs);  Section 1.5.2, Specialized Knowledge or Experience of the User;  Section 1.5.4, Reason for Significantly Lower Purchase Price;  Section 1.5.5, Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information;  Section 3.2, Standard Environmental Records Sources;  Section 3.4, Historical Use Information on the Subject Site and Adjoining Properties;  Section 4.0, Site Reconnaissance; and  Section 5.0, Interviews. 1.5.7 OTHER Either the user shall make known to the environmental professional the reason why the user wants to have the Phase I ESA performed or, if the user does not identify the purpose of the Phase I ESA, the environmental professional shall assume the purpose is to qualify for an LLP to CERCLA liability and state this in the report. Section 1.0 | Introduction Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 1-6 1.6 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS No special terms and conditions were identified for this scope of work. 1.7 USER RELIANCE The information and opinions rendered in this Phase I ESA are exclusively for use by the City of Anaheim. Michael Baker will not distribute or publish this report without the consent of the City of Anaheim, except as required by law or court order. The information and opinions expressed in this Phase I ESA are given in response to Michael Baker’s scope of services and limitations indicated above, and should be considered and implemented only in light of the scope of services and limitations. The services provided by Michael Baker in completing this Phase I ESA were consistent with normal standards of the profession. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 2-1 SECTION 2.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION Per ASTM E 1527-13, the user of the Phase I ESA has an obligation to answer all questions posed, in good faith, to the extent of his or her actual knowledge or to designate a key site manager to do so. If answers to questions are unknown or partially unknown to the user or such key site manager, this section shall not thereby be deemed incomplete. The City of Anaheim is the user of this Phase I ESA and has provided Michael Baker with information regarding the proposed project (bridge/roadway improvements) for the subject site. The City has requested this Phase I ESA for the purpose of due diligence for the proposed Orangewood Avenue Improvements project. Other information/documentation provided by the City is also referenced throughout this Phase I ESA, as applicable. 2.1 PREVIOUS DOCUMENTS The user did not provide any previous documents, including but not limited to the following, during the course of this Phase I ESA:  Environmental site assessments;  Environmental compliance audit reports;  Environmental permits;  Registrations for underground and aboveground storage tanks;  Material safety data sheets;  Community right-to-known plan;  Safety plans; preparedness and prevention plans; spill prevention, countermeasure, and control plans; facility response plans; etc.;  Reports regarding hydrogeologic conditions on the property or surrounding area;  Notices or other correspondence from any government agency relating to past or current violations of environmental laws with respect to the property or relating to environmental liens encumbering the property;  Hazardous waste generator notices or reports;  Geotechnical studies;  Risk assessments; and  Recorded AULs. Section 2.0 | User Provider Information Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 2-2 2.2 LITIGATION/ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS The user did not identify any information pertaining to any pending, threatened, or past litigation and/or administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property during the course of this Phase I ESA. 2.3 GOVERNMENTAL NOTICES The user did not identify any information pertaining to any notices from any governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products during the course of this Phase I ESA. 2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS The user did not provide any environmental lien information during the course of this Phase I ESA. 2.5 ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS The user did not provide any activity and use limitation information during the course of this Phase I ESA. 2.6 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE OR EXPERIENCE The user did not identify any specialized knowledge or experience related to the subject site during the course of this Phase I ESA. 2.7 COMMONLY KNOWN OR REASONABLY ASCERTAINABLE INFORMATION The user did not identify any commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information during the course of this Phase I ESA. Section 2.0 | User Provider Information Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 2-3 2.8 VALUATION REDUCTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES As the project does not involve purchase of private property, no valuation reduction was reported. 2.9 DEGREE OF OBVIOUSNESS The user did not report any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of releases at the property during the course of this Phase I ESA. 2.10 REASON FOR PERFORMING PHASE I This Phase I ESA has been requested by the City of Anaheim for the purpose of environmental compliance documentation for the proposed Orangewood Avenue Improvements project. Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-1 SECTION 3.0 RECORDS REVIEW 3.1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCES Physical setting sources typically provide information regarding geologic, hydrogeological, hydrologic, or topographic characteristics of a property. The following information is primarily based on the review of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Anaheim, California Quadrangle (dated 2015), and a site inspection conducted by Michael Baker on September 13, 2017. Other miscellaneous resources utilized within this section and throughout the Phase I ESA are referenced in Section 7.0, References. 3.1.1 SUBJECT SITE DESCRIPTION 3.1.1.1 Location The subject site is situated at, and to the west of, the State Route 57 (SR-57)/Orangewood Avenue interchange, in the cities of Anaheim and Orange, County of Orange, California (Section 25, Township 4 South [T.4S], Range 10 West [R.10W], San Bernardino Base and Meridian [SBBM]). Regionally the site is located approximately 0.63 mile east of Interstate 5 (I-5) and approximately 1.14 miles north of State Route 22 (SR-22). Refer to Exhibit 1, Regional Vicinity, and Exhibit 2, Site Vicinity. 3.1.1.2 Current Use(s) of the Subject Site The subject site consists of roadway and Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) right- of-way (ROW); refer to Exhibit 3, Subject Site. 3.1.1.3 Description of On-Site Structures and Roads No habitable structures are located on the subject site, as the boundaries lie within roadway and OCFCD ROW. Orangewood Avenue (a four-lane improved roadway), SR-57 ROW, and associated bridge structures are present on-site. Bridge structures include the Orangewood Avenue bridge over the Santa Ana River and the Orangewood Avenue Undercrossing structure associated with SR-57. P A C I F I C O C E A N ORANGE COUNTY SAN DIEGO COUNTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOS ANGELES COUNTY 261 241 241 142 1 1 22 39 5 5 5 133 55 405 405 605 15 5 57 91 72 91 71 90 74 73 IMPERIAL HWY. EDINGER AVE. WARNER AVE. IRVIN E BLV D. CROWN VALLEY PKWY. EA S TERN TRANS. CORR. WHITTIER BLVD. BEACH BLVD. EL TORO RD. SANTIAGO C ANY O N RD. CHAPMAN AVE. I RVINE CENTER DR. MOULTON PRKY. STREET OF THE G OLDEN LANTERN JAMBOREE RD. MACARTHUR BLVD. OLD NEWPOR T BL VD. Y O R BA LINDA BLVD . SA N JOAQUIN HILLS T R ANS. CORRIDOR PROP. FO O T H IL L TRANS. CORRIDOR HARBOR BLVD. KATELLA AVE. NewportBeach SanClemente SantaAna Anaheim Fullerton LaHabra Brea Cypress BuenaPark YorbaLinda Villa Park AnaheimHills MissionViejo LakeForest LagunaBeach DanaPoint San JuanCapistrano LagunaNiguel Orange HuntingtonBeach CostaMesa SealBeach GardenGrove Tustin Irvine LosAlamitos Subject Site Subject Site 09/28/17 JN 159416 MAS Exhibit 1 Regional Vicinity ORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS not to scale 0 2000' Source: USGS Anaheim, CA and Orange, CA Quadrangles, dated 2015. Subject SiteSubject Site 09/28/17 JN 159416 MAS Exhibit 2 Site Vicinity ORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS FLOWER STFLOWER STDUPONT DRDUPONT DRRAMPART STRAMPART STBITTERBUSH STBITTERBUSH STSTEVENS STSTEVENS STECKHOFF STECKHOFF STECKHOFF STECKHOFF STPOPLAR STPOPLAR STPOPLAR STPOPLAR STSEQUOIA AVESEQUOIA AVE SANTA ANA RIVER TRAILSANTA ANA RIVER TRAILCHERRY DRCHERRY DR SPRUCE AVESPRUCE AVEWILLOW AVEWILLOW AVESYCAMORE AVESYCAMORE AVE ORANGEWOOD AVENUEORANGEWOOD AVENUE B E V E R L Y D R B E V E R L Y D R Source: Aerial - Google Earth Pro, September 2017 Subject Site Subject Site 09/28/17 JN 159416 MAS Exhibit 3 Subject SiteORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS not to scale 57 57 Section 3.0 | Records Review Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-5 3.1.2 TOPOGRAPHY The USGS maps show geological formations and their characteristics, describing the physical setting of an area through contour lines and major surface features including lakes, rivers, streams, buildings, landmarks, and other factors that impact the spread of contamination. Additionally, the maps depict topography through color and contour lines and are helpful in determining elevations and site latitude and longitude. Based on the USGS Anaheim, California Quadrangle, dated 2015, on-site topography is approximately 145 to 150 feet above mean sea level (msl), generally flat, and sloping down- gradient toward the Santa Ana River and then south. The subject site consists of roadway (Orangewood Avenue and SR-57) and OCFCD (Santa Ana River) ROW. The western portion of the subject site crosses the Santa Ana River, which generally flows in a south/southwest direction. A railroad is noted to the north and Park Royale is indicated to the southwest. No on- site structures, pits, ponds, or lagoons are noted on-site on this topographic map. 3.1.3 CURRENT USES OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES For the scope of this Phase I ESA, properties are defined and categorized based upon their physical proximity to the subject site. An adjoining property is considered any real property or properties that border of which is contiguous or partially contiguous with that of the subject site, or that would be contiguous or partially contiguous with that of the subject site but for a street, road, or other public thoroughfare separating them. An adjacent property is any real property located off-site, which is not adjoining. The following is a detailed description of each adjoining land use observed on September 13, 2017:  North: Commercial uses (Stadium Collection Business Center and Angel Stadium of Anaheim [Angel Stadium]) are located to the north of the subject site. Upstream areas of the Santa Ana River are also present to the north. SR-57 continues north of the subject site.  East: Orangewood Avenue continues east of the subject site. Commercial uses are also present east of the subject site.  South: Commercial uses (Orangewood Corporate Plaza and the Fire Training Center) are present to the south of the subject site. The Santa Ana River flows south of the subject site. SR-57 is also present to the south of the subject site.  West: Orangewood Avenue continues west of the subject site. Commercial uses (Angel Stadium, the Fire Training Center, an office building [multiple tenants], and Karl Strauss Brewing Company) are located west of the subject site. Section 3.0 | Records Review Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-6 3.1.4 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS 3.1.4.1 Geology The USGS Geological Map Index was searched by EDR for available Geological Maps that cover the subject site and surrounding areas. These Geological Maps indicate geological formations that are overlaid on a topographic map. Some maps focus on specific issues (i.e., bedrock, sedimentary rocks, etc.) while others may identify artificial fills (including landfills). Geological maps can be effective in estimating permeability and other factors that influence the spread of contamination. According to the EDR GeoCheck Report, the land consists of a stratified sequence from the Cenozoic era. According to The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, dated August 2010, sedimentary formations underlying the area are comprised of consolidated and semiconsolidated sandstone, siltstone, and conglomerates of Cretaceous to late Tertiary age. Soils underlying the area are characterized by moderate to moderately rapid permeability, slow runoff, and a slight erosion potential. 3.1.4.2 Soils The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Soil Survey Maps were searched for available soils within the subject site. Three (3) soil series are reported within the boundaries of the subject site; refer to Appendix C, Documentation, for a mapping of on-site soils. The following is a detailed description of each soil series located within the subject site:  Hueneme Fine Sandy Loam, Drained (158): The landform for this soil is alluvial fans and the parent material is stratified alluvium derived from sedimentary rock. Hueneme fine sandy load is poorly drained. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. There is no frequency of flooding or ponding associated with this soil.  Metz Loamy Sand, Moderately Fine Substratum (164): The landform for this soil is alluvial fans and the parent material is mixed alluvium derived from igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rock. Metz Loamy Sand, Moderately Fine Substratum is somewhat excessively drained. Runoff class is negligible. Slopes are 0 to 2 percent. Frequency of flooding is rare and there is no frequency of ponding associated with this soil.  Riverwash (191): The landform for this soil is fans and the parent material is sandy and gravelly alluvium. Slopes are 0 to 5 percent. Frequency of flooding is frequent. Section 3.0 | Records Review Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-7 3.1.4.3 Radon Radon is a radioactive gas that is found in certain geologic environments and is formed by the natural breakdown of radium, which is found in the earth’s crust. Radon is an invisible, odorless, inert gas that emits alpha particles, known to cause lung cancer. Radon levels are highest in basements (areas in close proximity to the soil) that are poorly ventilated. A radon survey was not included within the scope of this investigation. According to the “U.S. EPA Map of Radon Zones,” the County of Orange is located within Zone 3, which has a predicted average indoor screening of less than 2.0 pCi/L (picocuries per liter). EPA recommends remedial actions when radon levels are greater than 4.0 pCi/L. 3.1.5 BIOLOGICAL SETTING The subject site consists of paved asphalt, concrete, ornamental landscaping, and biological resources associated with the Santa Ana River. 3.1.6 DRAINAGE/HYDROLOGY 3.1.6.1 Drainage Drainage of the subject site is accomplished by overland sheet flow, which enters the existing storm drainage system along Orangewood Avenue. The drainage in the subject site vicinity is anticipated to follow the general topography of the area, which is generally toward the Santa Ana River, than in a southern/southwestern direction towards the Pacific Ocean. 3.1.6.2 Flood Hazards Flood Prone Area Maps published by the USGS show areas prone to 100-year floods overlaid on a topographical map. These maps are not considered the official Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood maps; therefore, in cases where a property is located immediately adjacent to or within the flood prone boundary, a FEMA map should be obtained. According to the EDR Database search and the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), the subject site (within the Santa Ana River) is located within the 100-year flood zone (refer to the Appendix B, Database Records Searches, and Appendix C). Section 3.0 | Records Review Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-8 3.1.6.3 Groundwater Michael Baker assumes groundwater flow would follow the slope of the ground surface elevations towards the nearest open body of water or intermittent stream. The direction of this on-site flow is expected to generally be in a southern/southwestern direction. 3.2 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS SOURCES The governmental sources have been searched by EDR (at the request of Michael Baker) for sites within the subject site and within an approximate one-mile radius of the subject site boundaries. Upon completion of their search, EDR provided Michael Baker with their findings dated August 22, 2017. Michael Baker makes no claims as to the completeness or accuracy of the referenced sources. Our review of EDR's findings can only be as current as their listings and may not represent all known or potential hazardous waste or contaminated sites. To reduce the potential for omitting possible hazardous material sites on the subject site and within the surrounding area, sites may be listed in this report if there is any doubt as to the location because of discrepancies in map location, zip code, address, or other information. Refer to Appendix B for a listing and description of the Federal, tribal, State, and local records searched. 3.2.1 SUBJECT SITE The lists that were reviewed did not report any regulatory properties within the boundaries of the subject site (refer to Exhibit 4, Overview Map). No known corrective action, restoration, or remediation has been planned, is currently taking place, or has been completed on the subject site. The subject site has not been under investigation for violation of any environmental laws, regulations, or standards, as identified in the databases reported by EDR (refer to Appendix B). 3.2.2 OFF-SITE PROPERTIES The lists that were reviewed reported multiple listed regulatory sites located within a one mile radius of the subject site that was listed in one or more of the regulatory databases identified in Appendix B. For a complete list of sites identified and their status, refer to Appendix B. The following is a discussion of reported off-site properties. 60 k V Source: EDR, Inc., 2017 09/11/17 JN 159416 MAS Exhibit 4 Overview Map ORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS • PHASE I ESA Section 3.0 | Records Review Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-10 Adjoining Properties The lists reviewed identified two properties adjoining the subject site (2211 West Orangewood Avenue and 2400 East Orangewood Avenue). The property located at 2211 West Orangewood Avenue was listed for having an underground storage tank. The property located at 2400 East Orangewood Avenue was listed for a historical underground storage tank (refer to Appendix B). Refer to Table 3-1, Database Summaries, for a description of the regulatory databases reported in association with properties listed of concern. Refer to Table 3-2, Identified Regulatory Sites of Concern, for further evaluation of these properties listed of concern. Table 3-1 Database Summaries Database Description AST The Aboveground Storage Tank database contains a listing of Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks. CA FID UST The CA FID UST database maintains information on properties where an underground storage tank is located. CHMIRS The CHMIRS database maintains information on reported hazardous material incidents, i.e., accidental releases or spills. The source is the California Office of Emergency Services. EMI The Emissions Inventory Data (EMI) database includes toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data that is collected by the Air Resources Board (ARB) and local air pollution agencies. ENVIROSTOR The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifies sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List [NPL]); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. HAZNET The HAZNET database extracts data from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000-1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000-500,000 shipments. Data from non-California manifests & continuation sheets are not included at the present time. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. The source is the Department of Toxic Substance Control. HIST CORTESE The historic “Cortese” Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List is a list of sites that are designated by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the Integrated Waste Board, and the Department of Toxic Substances Control. HIST UST The HIST UST database contains information on sites where historical underground storage tanks are located. Section 3.0 | Records Review Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-11 Table 3-1 (continued) Database Summaries Database Description NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits Listing is a listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. RCRA-SQG The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) – Small Quantity Generator (SQG) database contains selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat, and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by RCRA. Small quantity generators generate less than 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. SQGs generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. SEMS-ARCHIVE The Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive (SEMS-ARCHIVE) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. SLIC The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. SWEEPS UST The Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System, the SWEEPS UST database also maintains information on properties where an underground storage tank is located, however, this database is no longer updated. UST The Underground Storage Tank (UST) database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data comes from the State Water Resources Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. WDS The Waste Discharge System (WDS) database is a listing of sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Table 3-2 Identified Regulatory Sites of Concern EDR Map ID# Site Name/Address Direction from Subject Site Regulatory Database EDR Site Status File Review1 1 Caremark Infant Care 2211 W. Orangewood Avenue Orange, CA 92868 Adjoining to the north UST Site status was not reported in EDR. YES Michael Baker conducted a file review at the OCHCA on October 3, 2017. Section 3.0 | Records Review Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-12 Table 3-2 (continued) Identified Regulatory Sites of Concern EDR Map ID# Site Name/Address Direction from Subject Site Regulatory Database EDR Site Status File Review1 A2 A3 A4 A5 Fire Station Training Center Anaheim Fire Training Center 2400 East Orangewood Avenue Anaheim, CA 92805 Adjoining to the southwest Hist UST AST SWEEPS UST CA FID UST EMI Hist UST reports one diesel fuel tank. SWEEPS UST reports an active site status as of August 6, 1992 NO Michael Baker requested files from the OCHCA. However, the OCHCA responded that no files are available for review. B7 B8 C9 C10 YRC, Inc. (896) Yellow Freight System Inc. 700 N. Eckhoff Street Orange, CA 92868 610 feet north of subject site UST RCRA-SQG SLIC Hist UST CA FID UST CHMIRS NPDES WDS SWEEPS UST SLIC RCRA-SQG reports the classification as Small Small Quantity Generator and historic generators classification as Large Quantity Generator. No violations were found. SLIC REG 8 reported TCE contamination to groundwater. The facility received a closed status. Hist UST reports two fuel tanks and one wastewater tank installed in 1972. CA FID UST reports an active site status. CHMIRS reports notification of a 50-pound bag of resin powder spill on August 1, 2012 and another 50-pound bag spill of toxic solid, Vanax DOTG, on March 9, 2015. Cleanup was reported to be in progress. Diatomaceous earth spill was reported on March 2, 2015 and a half cup spill of Azodicarbonamide was reported on July 22, 2016. A contractor was enroute to conduct a cleanup of the release. On November 6, 2012, a spill of Naxan Powder was reported. WDS reports a minor threat to water quality. The facility has an active status. SWEEPS UST reports two fuel tanks and a waste oil tank with an action date of February 19, 1992. Site status is active. SLIC reports Toluene, Xylene, Diesel, and Gasoline contaminated surface/structure, other groundwater, and soil. Temporary discontinuation of groundwater monitoring and agreement to maintain wells (possible off-site contamination) was reported on April 19, 1990. Case closed/completed on November 10, 2009. YES Michael Baker reviewed available online files maintained by the RWQCB. Based on a response from the OCHCA, no OCHCA files were available for review. H31 H32 Inland Special Ties Chemical Corp Inland Specialties Chemical Corporation 2023 W. Collins Avenue Orange, CA 92668 0.46-mile northeast of subject site SEMS- ARCHIVE RCRA-SQG HAZNET HIST CORTESE ENVIROSTOR SLIC SEMS-ARCHIVE reported discovery on December 1, 1987; archive site and preliminary assessment on November 10, 1988. RCRA-SQG reported a Small Small Quantity Generator. No violations have been found. HAZNET reported 3.5 tons of halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene, etc.) in 2000. 2.125 tons of halogenated solvents were reported and treated via incineration in 1999. 0.75 tons of an unknown substance was reported and treated via incineration in 1998. Two tons of halogenated solvents were reported and treated via incineration in 1998. 2 tons of other organic solids were reported and treated via incineration in YES Michael Baker reviewed available online files maintained by the RWQCB and conducted a file review at the OCHCA on October 3, 2017. Section 3.0 | Records Review Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-13 Table 3-2 (continued) Identified Regulatory Sites of Concern EDR Map ID# Site Name/Address Direction from Subject Site Regulatory Database EDR Site Status File Review1 1997. ENVIROSTOR reported halogenated solvents release on July 1, 1982; site screening was completed on June 1, 1995, May 2, 1995, September 19, 1988, April 15, 1988, and May 4, 1987; and a preliminary assessment report was completed on May 4, 1988. SLIC reported potential contaminants of concern: Trichloroethane, Tetrachloroethylene, and Trichloroethylene. A vapor extraction system was installed in 1996. Monitoring wells were installed and have been non-detect since 1997. Case closed/completed on April 7, 2005. Notes: RWQCB: Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board; OCHCA = Orange County Health Care Agency 1. Refer to Section 3.3, File Record Reviews, for a discussion of files reviewed, if applicable. Source: Environmental Data Resources, Inc., EDR Radius Map with GeoCheck, dated August 22, 2017; refer to Appendix B, Database Records Searches. Adjacent Properties 24 adjacent properties were listed surrounding the subject site. However, only two adjacent regulatory properties have been identified that present a potential concern to groundwater underlying the subject site. Refer to Table 3-1 and Table 3-2 above, for a description of the regulatory databases reported in association with properties listed. Refer to Table 3-3, for further evaluation of these adjoining properties listed. All other reported adjacent regulatory properties are considered to have a low potential of affecting the subject site for one or more of the following reasons: distance from the subject site, direction of anticipated groundwater flow, site status, and/or no contamination has been reported. Refer to Appendix B for a listing of all adjacent properties reported. 3.2.3 UNMAPPED PROPERTIES According to EDR’s ESA Report Desktop Reference, dated 1996, some reported sites are unmappable as exact locations remain undefined. Listings in publically available records, which do not have adequate address information, are generally not considered practically reviewable. For the purposes of this Phase I ESA, practically reviewable information is defined as information provided in a manner and in a form that yields information without the need for extraordinary analysis or irrelevant data. Although the location of these sites may be unknown, the site and detail information are often available through the EDR. Section 3.0 | Records Review Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-14 Michael Baker’s review of Unmapped Properties consisted of a verification, based solely on the professional judgment of the Environmental Professional, that the subject site is not listed (i.e., referenced by name or street address) and review to identify if any of the Unmapped Properties cause a likely potential to create an REC within the boundaries of the subject site. No listed Unmapped Properties appear to be located within the boundaries of the subject site. Also, potentially contaminated groundwater underlying the subject site as a result of the reported Unmapped Properties is considered unlikely, due to the anticipated distance from the subject site, gradient, and/or the status of the identified site. 3.3 FILE RECORD REVIEWS If the subject site or any of the adjoining properties are identified on one or more of the standard environmental record sources, pertinent regulatory files and/or records associated with the listing should be reviewed. The purpose of the regulatory file review is to obtain sufficient information to assist the environmental professional in determining if a REC, HREC, CREC, or a de minimis condition exists at the property in connection with the listing. If, in the environmental professional’s opinion, such a review is not warranted, the environmental professional must explain the justification for not conducting the regulatory file review. Michael Baker requested available files for review at the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) on August 29, 2017 for those properties of concern identified in Table 3-2. The OCHCA had available records for two of the properties. The following is a summary of Michael Baker’s review of the OCHCA’s files reviewed on October 3, 2017:  2211 West Orangewood Avenue: Based on the file review, the property is located at 2211 East Orangewood Avenue and EDR miss-mapped this property. As this site is not adjoining the subject site, but is actually situated greater than 1,400 feet west of the subject site, this property is no longer of concern.  2023 West Collins Avenue: Records reviewed applied to a current use, the OC Public Works Fleet Service Shop 2, which is a hazardous waste generator. No indication of a release was noted in association with the facility. No other records pertaining to other past uses or actual releases was noted. In addition to those files available by the OCHCA, Michael Baker searched the online GeoTracker database maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) for file information relative to the adjoining properties of concern in September 2017. GeoTracker was developed pursuant to a mandate by the California State Legislature to investigate the feasibility of Section 3.0 | Records Review Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-15 establishing a statewide Geographic Information System (GIS) for leaking underground storage tanks (LUST) sites and is maintained by the SWRCB. Michael Baker makes no claims as to the completeness or accuracy of GeoTracker; our review of GeoTracker’s findings can only be as current as their listings and may not represent all known or potential hazardous waste or contaminated sites. Available online files were reviewed for the following off-site properties: 700 North Eckhoff Street: This property reported a release to soil and was closed by the RWQCB on November 10, 2009. However, the case closure letter identified groundwater contamination at this property (which is only 588 feet up-gradient of the subject site) as a result of the off-site property 2023 West Collins Street (which is situated approximately 2,420 feet up gradient from the subject site). 2023 West Collins Street: This off-site property (situated approximately 2,420 feet up gradient from the subject site) reported a release of 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA), Tetrachloroethylene (PCE), Trichloroethylene (TCE) to soil and groundwater. A vapor extraction system (VES) was installed in 1996 and since 1996, approximately 2,000 pounds of VOCs have been removed through this process. As VES was no longer effective in removing residual VOCs from the soil and the site being consistent with the RWQCB’s low threat policy, this case was closed on April 7, 2005. Based on the files reviewed as part of 700 North Eckhoff Street, groundwater down-gradient this property as far as 6,500 feet remain impacted by this release (although case closure has been achieved). As the subject site is located within this impact area, this reported groundwater contamination is of concern. 3.4 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT SITE AND ADJOINING PROPERTIES The objective of consulting historical sources is to develop a history of the previous uses of the property and surrounding area, in order to help identify the likelihood of past uses having led to RECs in connection with the property. The Environmental Professional shall exercise professional judgment and consider the possible releases that might have occurred at a property in light of the historical uses and, in concert with other relevant information gathered as part of the Phase I ESA process, use this information to assist in identifying RECs (discussed in Section 6.0, Evaluation, of this Phase I ESA). The standard sources identified by ASTM E 1527-13 include aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, property tax files, recorded land title records (a chain-of-title), historical USGS topographic maps, local street directories, building department records, zoning/land use records, prior Section 3.0 | Records Review Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-16 assessments, and other historical sources (i.e., any source or sources, other than those listed, that are credible to a reasonable person and that identify past uses of the property). The focus is on usage rather than ownership, which is why a chain-of-title is not sufficient by itself. 3.4.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 3.4.1.1 Methodology Data failure (a subset of a data gap) occurs when all of the standard historical sources that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful have been reviewed and yet the historical source review objectives have not been met. USES OF THE PROPERTY Per ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice, historical uses “shall be identified from the present, back to the property’s obvious first development use including (agricultural and fill activities), or back to 1940, whichever is earlier.” This task requires reviewing only as many of the standard historical sources as are necessary and both reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful. Historical information for the subject site was obtained back to 1896, at which time the subject site was vacant land. Sources reviewed have been cited throughout this section and are referenced in Section 7.0, References, of this Phase I ESA. INTERVALS Review of standard historical sources at less than approximately five year intervals is not required by ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice. If the specific use of the property appears unchanged over a period longer than five years, then it is not required by ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice to research the use during that period. Michael Baker did not encounter data failure with regard to source intervals during the course of this Phase I ESA. USES OF PROPERTIES IN SURROUNDING AREA Uses in the area surrounding the property shall be identified in the Phase I ESA, but this task is only required to the extent that this information is revealed in the course of researching the property itself. If the environmental professional uses sources that include the surrounding area, surrounding uses should be identified to a distance determined at the discretion of the environmental professional. Factors to consider in making this determination include, but are not limited to: Section 3.0 | Records Review Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-17  The extent to which information is reasonably ascertainable;  The time and cost involved in reviewing surrounding uses;  The extent to which information is useful, accurate, and complete in light of the purpose of the records review;  The likelihood of the information being significant to RECs in connection with the property;  The extent to which potential concerns are obvious;  Known hydrogeologic/geologic conditions that may indicate a high probability of hazardous substances or petroleum products migration to the property;  How recently local development has taken place;  Information obtained from interviews and other sources; and  Local good commercial and customary practice. Surrounding land uses have been noted throughout the Phase I ESA, as applicable, and are referenced accordingly. 3.4.1.2 Limiting Conditions Michael Baker did not encounter any limiting conditions that limited the historical use review during the course of this Phase I ESA. 3.4.2 STANDARD HISTORICAL SOURCES 3.4.2.1 Historical Uses Summary Based upon the evaluation of documented land use as demonstrated in the resources reviewed as part of this Phase I ESA, the subject site appears to have consisted of a portion of the Santa Ana River and vacant land by 1896. The vacant portion of the subject site consisted of agricultural uses by 1938. Orangewood Avenue was constructed by 1966 and reconfigured by 1972. SR-57 and the Orangewood Avenue/SR-57 interchange was constructed by 1977. The subject site has remained a transportation land use to the present. The surrounding area appears to have historically consisted of agriculture uses until the 1960’s, at which time residential and commercial uses began and continued through the 1980’s. Construction of the Anaheim Stadium occurred in the 1960’s and construction of SR-57 in the 1970’s. By the 1980’s, the surrounding uses appear to have been fully developed and has generally remained unchanged to the present day. Refer to Table 3-3, Historical Uses Summary. Section 3.0 | Records Review Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-18 Table 3-3 Historical Uses Summary Year On-Site Use Surrounding Uses Source 1896 The western portion of the subject site appears to consist of the Santa Ana River and the eastern portion appears to consist of vacant land. The Santa Ana River traverses the western portion of the subject site in a northeast to southwest direction. Four railroad lines surround the subject site: Union Pacific Railroad appears to travel in a west/east direction, north of the subject site and in a northwest/southeast direction, southwest of the subject site; and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad appears to travel in a northwest to southeast direction, north of the subject site and in a north/south direction, east of the subject site. Sparse structures and infrastructure is noted in the area. The developing area of Orange is present to the southeast. USGS Topographic Maps 1898 No changes noted. No changes noted. USGS Topographic Maps 1901 No changes noted. Transportation uses and development surrounding the subject site increased. Tustin Junction is noted northwest of the subject site. USGS Topographic Maps 1902 No changes noted. No changes noted. USGS Topographic Maps 1932 Unmapped. Transportation uses and development surrounding the subject site increased. USGS Topographic Maps 1935 No changes noted. West Anaheim Junction is noted west of the subject site. Santa Ana Boulevard (also noted as US Highway 101) runs parallel to the Union Pacific Railroad, southwest of the subject site. Mausoleum is noted west of the subject site. County Farm and Hospital is noted southwest of the subject site. Placentia, running in north/south direction, is noted as a highway west of the subject site. USGS Topographic Maps 1938 The eastern portion of the subject site appears to consist of agricultural uses. The land adjoining the subject site to the north/northeast, east, and south/southeast appears to consist of agricultural uses. Aerial Photographs 1942 A levee is noted on both the west and east bank of the Santa Ana river within the boundaries of the subject site. A levee is noted on both the west and east bank of the Santa Ana river, north and south of the subject site. SR-22 is noted traveling in a west/east direction, south/southwest of the subject site. Transportation uses and development surrounding the subject site increased. A developed area is noted southeast of the subject site. USGS Topographic Maps 1947 No changes noted. The land adjoining the subject site to the west, northwest, and southwest appears to be used for agricultural purposes. Aerial Photographs 1949 No changes noted. US Highway 101 is noted as a four-lane freeway. Additional street names are noted including Parker Avenue. USGS Topographic Maps Section 3.0 | Records Review Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-19 Table 3-3 (continued) Historical Uses Summary Year On-Site Use Surrounding Uses Source 1950 No changes noted. No changes noted. USGS Topographic Maps 1952 No changes noted. No changes noted. Aerial Photographs 1963 No changes noted. Increased residential development has occurred to the south of the subject site. Aerial Photographs 1964, 1965 No changes noted. Anaheim Stadium is noted northwest of the subject site. A Drive-in Theater is noted southwest of the subject site. Sycamore School and Portola Junior High School are noted southeast of the subject site. US Highway 101 is noted as I-5. Freeway interchanges are noted along SR-22 and I-5. USGS Topographic Maps 1966 Orangewood Avenue bridge over the Santa Ana River is being constructed. A temporary road has been constructed during bridge construction. No changes noted. Aerial Photographs 1972 The temporary road has been removed and the Orangewood Avenue bridge and roadway traverses the subject site in a west/east direction. No other roadways travers the site. Additional land disturbance, development, and transportation uses are noted surrounding the subject site. Aerial Photographs, USGS Topographic Maps 1977 State Route 57 is built and the freeway traverses the subject site in a general north/south direction midway through the site. The Orangewood/SR-57 interchange is noted within the middle and eastern portions of the subject site. Additional development is noted east and northeast of the subject site. Aerial Photographs 1981 No changes noted. No changes noted. USGS Topographic Maps 1985 No changes noted. Adjoining properties to the southwest, northeast, and southeast are developed with structures. The land surrounding the subject site appears to be fully developed. Aerial Photographs 1989 No changes noted. Redevelopment of a property is noted northeast of the subject site. Aerial Photographs 1990 No changes noted. No changes noted. Aerial Photographs 1995 No changes noted. The Santa Ana River appears to be disturbed. A new structure is noted at a property located northeast of the subject site. Aerial Photographs 2005 No changes noted. The Santa Ana River appears to have a hydraulic or water quality system in place. Structures located southwest of the subject site has been demolished and the property graded. Aerial Photographs Section 3.0 | Records Review Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-20 Table 3-3 (continued) Historical Uses Summary Year On-Site Use Surrounding Uses Source 2009 No changes noted. Redevelopment is noted southwest of the subject site Aerial Photographs 2010 No changes noted. No changes noted. Aerial Photographs 2012 No changes noted. Additional development and transportation uses are noted. Aerial Photographs, USGS Topographic Maps Notes: Bold denotes an interval data gap, as described in Section 3.4.1.1, Methodology, Intervals. Other sources reviewed, but that which did not include information pertaining to the subject site included the following: Sanborn Maps and City Directory. Source: Refer to Section 7, References, and Appendix C, for full citation and documentation of sources utilized in this table. 3.4.2.2 Property Tax Files Michael Baker searched the subject site for property data via First American Real Estate Solutions and the legal description for the subject site. This data typically provides current property ownership information and includes information regarding on-site improvements, zoning, land use, transfer of last sale, and other miscellaneous structural improvements. Because the subject site lies within roadway/floodway ROW and there are no on-site APNs or addresses, property information for this site was not available for review. 3.4.2.3 Zoning/Land Use Records Zoning/land use records generally consist of records maintained by the local government in which the subject site is located. They indicate the uses permitted by the local government for particular zones within its jurisdiction. The records may consist of maps and/or written records. Because the subject site lies within roadway/floodway ROW, there are no zoning/land use records that apply. 3.4.2.4 Oil and Gas Wells Michael Baker reviewed the California Department of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) online mapping system on August 30, 2017, which indicates existing and historical oil and gas wells within the immediate vicinity of the subject site. Current well status for any well indicated in the online mapping system should be confirmed at the appropriate Division of Oil and Gas District Office. According to DOGGR, no oil or gas wells are located within the subject site and the subject site does not appear to be situated in an oil or gas field (refer to Appendix C). Section 3.0 | Records Review Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 3-21 3.4.2.5 Other Historical Sources Michael Baker reviewed the hazardous materials analysis associated with the Draft Environmental Impact Report for The revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 (Platinum Triangle SEIR No. 339), dated August 2010. Based on Platinum Triangle SEIR No. 339, database records searches were conducted as part of the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan FEIR No. 321 in 1999 and the FSEIR No. 332 in 2005 to identify properties that could potentially pose a variety of environmental hazards within the boundaries and immediately adjacent to The Platinum Triangle. Action status on many of the identified properties were “closed” and required no further remediation and some were undergoing environmental remediation. However, the Platinum Triangle SEIR No. 339 concluded that these impacts are site-specific and implementation of Mitigation Measures 5.4-1 through 5.4-7 of MMP No. 106A, prepared for FSEIR No. 332, would ensure that identified hazardous waste and/or hazardous material would be handled and disposed of in the manner specified by the State California Hazardous Substances Control Law (Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5) and according to the requirements of the California Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 22. Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 4-1 SECTION 4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE According to the ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice, the objective of the site reconnaissance is to obtain information indicating the likelihood of identifying RECs in connection with the subject site. 4.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 4.1.1 METHODOLOGY Michael Baker performed a visual observation of readily accessible areas of the subject site and immediately adjoining properties on September 13, 2017. At this time, the subject site was visually inspected. Refer to Exhibit 5, On-Site Photographs, and Exhibit 6, Off-Site Photographs, for photograph documentation conducted during the site visit. The subject site was viewed from all public thoroughfares. If roads or paths with no apparent outlet are observed on the subject site, the use of the road or path was identified to determine whether it was likely to have been used as an avenue for disposal of hazardous substances or petroleum products. 4.1.2 LIMITING CONDITIONS No limiting conditions were encountered as part of Michael Baker’s site visit conducted on September 13, 2017. 4.2 ON-SITE OBSERVATIONS 4.2.1 DESCRIPTION OF ON-SITE USES The subject site consists of transportation uses. 4.2.2 DESCRIPTION OF ON-SITE STRUCTURES AND ROADS The subject site consists of Orangewood Avenue and OCFCD ROW (Santa Ana River). Other than two bridge structures, no on-site habitable structures are present. View of the eastern portion of the subject site looking west. View looking west at the existing on-site Orangewood Avenue bridge structure over the Santa Ana River. View of the eastern portion of the subject site looking east. View looking west at existing Orangewood Avenue Undercrossing bridge structure. 09/19/17 JN 159416 MAS Exhibit 5 On-Site PhotographsORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS • PHASE I ESA View of commercial land use (Orangewood Corporate Plaza) south of the eastern portion of the subject site. View of the Santa Ana River and Angel Stadium located to the north and northwest, respectively, of the subject site. View of commercial land use (Stadium Collection Business Park) north of the eastern portion of the subject site. View of the existing Fire Training Center located to the southwest of the western portion of the subject site. 09/19/17 JN 159416 MAS Exhibit 6 Off-Site PhotographsORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS • PHASE I ESA Section 4.0 | Site Reconnaissance Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 4-4 4.2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PAST USES OF THE SUBJECT SITE Based on review of available documentation noted in Section 3.0, Records Review, past uses of the subject site appear to have consisted of a portion of the Santa Ana River and vacant land by 1896. The vacant land became agricultural land uses by 1938. Orangewood Avenue was constructed by 1966 and reconfigured by 1972. SR-57 and the Orangewood Avenue/SR-57 interchange was constructed by 1977. The subject site has remained a transportation land use to the present. No evidence to suggest the presence of other past uses was noted during the site visit. 4.2.4 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS Michael Baker did not observe hazardous substances or petroleum products at the subject site. No staining or evidence of leaking was observed. 4.2.5 CHEMICAL STORAGE TANKS (ASTS AND USTS) During the September 13, 2017 site inspection the subject site was inspected for fill pipes, vent pipes, areas of abnormal or heavy staining, manways, manholes, access covers, concrete pads not homogenous with surrounding surfaces, concrete build-up areas potentially indicating pump islands, abandoned pumping equipment, or fuel pumps. Michael Baker did not observe any evidence of aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) or underground storage tanks (USTs) on the subject site during the September 13, 2017 site visit. 4.2.6 SPILLS Michael Baker did not observe evidence of spills during the September 13, 2017 site visit. 4.2.7 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL No indication of on-site solid waste disposal practices (i.e., landfills) was apparent during the September 13, 2017 site inspection. 4.2.8 UTILITIES Typical roadside utilities were noted during the September 13, 2017 site inspection. Evidence of underground utilities (i.e., telephone cable, sewer, and other water-related utilities) and aboveground electrical utilities (i.e., streetlights, electrical boxes, and overhead power lines) were Section 4.0 | Site Reconnaissance Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 4-5 noted throughout the vicinity of the subject site. No staining or leakage was noted with respect to on-site utilities. 4.2.8.1 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) No power poles were observed on-site during the September 13, 2017 site visit. 4.2.8.2 Wells No water wells were observed within the boundaries of the subject site during the September 13, 2017 site visit. 4.2.8.3 Potable Water Supply The subject site vicinity appeared to be connected to a water line, which was noted via manhole covers along on-site roadways. No evidence to suggest the presence of on-site water wells was noted. 4.2.8.4 Sewage Disposal System The subject site vicinity appeared to be connected to existing sewer utilities. No evidence of other sewage disposal systems (including septic systems) was noted during the site visit. 4.2.8.5 Heating/Cooling No habitable structures are located on-site; Michael Baker did not observe heating or cooling systems during the site visit. 4.2.9 DRAINS AND SUMPS Storm drain systems (curb and gutter) were noted along the roadways in the vicinity of the subject site during the September 13, 2017 site visit. 4.2.10 PITS, PONDS, LAGOONS No pits, ponds, or lagoons were noted during the September 13, 2017 site visit. Section 4.0 | Site Reconnaissance Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 4-6 4.3 OFF-SITE OBSERVATIONS An adjoining property is considered any real property or properties that the border of which is contiguous or partially contiguous with that of the subject site, or that would be contiguous or partially contiguous with that of the subject site but for a street, road, or other public thoroughfare separating them. An adjacent property is any real property located off-site, which is not adjoining. Visual observations of the publicly accessible portions of adjoining properties were conducted on September 13, 2017 as part of this Phase I ESA and are described below. 4.3.1 DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE SURROUNDING AREA Current uses surrounding the subject site primarily consist of transportation, commercial, residential, and water-related land uses. Based on review of available documentation noted in Section 3.0, past uses of the surrounding area appear to have consisted of agriculture uses until the 1960’s. Development increased between the 1960’s and 1970’s, including construction of the Anaheim Stadium in the 1960’s and construction of SR-57 in the 1970’s, while agriculture decreased. By the 1980’s, the surrounding uses appear to be fully developed and has generally remained unchanged to the present day. 4.3.2 DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT USES AND STRUCTURES AT ADJOINING PROPERTIES The following is a detailed description of each adjoining land use observed on September 13, 2017:  North: Commercial uses (Stadium Collection Business Center) are located to the north of the subject site. Upstream areas of the Santa Ana River are also present to the north. SR-57 continues north of the subject site.  East: Orangewood Avenue continues east of the subject site. Commercial uses are also present east of the subject site.  South: Commercial uses (Orangewood Corporate Plaza) is present to the south of the subject site. The Santa Ana River flows south of the subject site. SR-57 is also present to the south of the subject site.  West: Orangewood Avenue continues west of the subject site. Commercial uses (Angel Stadium of Anaheim [Angel Stadium] and the Fire Training Center) are located west of the subject site. Section 4.0 | Site Reconnaissance Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 4-7 4.3.3 DESCRIPTION OF PAST USES AND STRUCTURES AT ADJOINING PROPERTIES Based on the available documentation noted in Section 3.0, adjoining land uses appear to have historically consisted of agricultural land uses. No evidence of past uses was observed during the site visit. 4.3.4 OBSERVATIONS OF OFF-SITE PROPERTIES 4.3.4.1 Utilities Typical roadside utilities (e.g., stormwater drainage, sewer, irrigation, and electrical utilities including overhead power lines and pole-mounted electrical transformers) were noted during the site inspection. No staining or leakage was observed with respect to off-site utilities. 4.3.4.2 Chemical Storage Tanks No evidence of chemical storage tanks was observed at off-site properties during the September 13, 2017 site visit. 4.3.4.3 Hazardous Materials During a preliminary observation of adjoining properties from public thoroughfares, no visible or physical evidence was observed to suggest that hazardous substances and/or petroleum- based material are handled/stored/used or have been recently released into the environment. No unusual or suspicious materials handling or storage practices were observed with respect to adjacent properties. Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 5-1 SECTION 5.0 INTERVIEWS The ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice indicates that the objective of interviews is to obtain information indicating RECs in connection with the subject site. Interviews with past and present owners, operators, and occupants of the property consist of questions to be asked in the manner and of persons as described in the ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice. The content of questions to be asked shall attempt to obtain information about uses and conditions observed during the site reconnaissance as well as the documentation review. The content of questions to be asked of State and/or local government officials shall be decided in the discretion of the environmental professional(s) conducting the Phase I ESA, provided that the questions shall generally be directed towards identifying RECs in connection with the subject site. 5.1 PROPERTY OWNER Due to the nature of the project (roadway improvements), current and past property owners were not readily available for interview. 5.2 KEY SITE MANAGER/OPERATOR A key site manager is a person with good knowledge of the uses and physical characteristics of the property. Often the Key Site Manager is the property manager, the chief physical plant supervisor, or head maintenance person. If the user is the current property owner, the user has an obligation to identify a key site manager, even if it is the user himself or herself. Mr. Brendan Dugan, P.E., with Michael Baker International, has been identified as the Key Site Manager for the purposes of this analysis. Mr. Dugan has provided Michael Baker with information pertaining to the subject site throughout this Phase I ESA, which has been referenced accordingly. 5.3 OCCUPANTS No occupants are associated with the subject site, as the site consists of transportation uses and OCFCD ROW. Thus, no occupants are available for interview during the course of this Phase I ESA. Section 5.0 | Site Reconnaissance Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA |5-2 5.4 LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS Michael Baker did not interview local government officials at the time of this Phase I ESA. 5.5 OTHER PERSONS No other persons were interviewed during the course of this Phase I ESA. Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 6-1 SECTION 6.0 EVALUATION Michael Baker has performed a Phase I ESA in general conformance with the scope of services and limitations of ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice for the Orangewood Avenue Improvements Project, located in the cities of Anaheim and Orange, Orange County, State of California. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 6.3, Limiting Conditions/Deviations, of this report. This Phase I ESA has revealed the following in connection with the subject site. 6.1 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS The following findings and opinions are based upon review of reasonable ascertainable referenced material available to Michael Baker during the preparation of this Phase I ESA, which included a review of historical aerial photographs, historical topographic maps, regulatory databases, and other documentation, as well as interviews and site reconnaissance. 6.1.1 CURRENT ON-SITE USES The subject site currently consists of transportation uses (Orangewood Avenue and SR-57) and OCFCD ROW. Although no buildings are located on-site, two bridge structures (the Orangewood Avenue Undercrossing and the Orangewood Avenue bridge over the Santa Ana River) are located within the subject site. 6.1.1.1 Bridge Structures Asbestos-Containing Materials Asbestos is a strong, incombustible, and corrosion resistant material, which was used in many commercial products since prior to the 1940s and up until the early 1970s. If inhaled, asbestos fibers can result in serious health problems. Asbestos containing-materials (ACMs) are building materials containing more than one percent (1%) asbestos (some state and regional regulators impose a one-tenth of one percent (0.1%) threshold). As ACMs are commonly known to be used in building materials for bridge structures, ACMs may be present in the two on-site bridge structures (Orangewood Avenue bridge constructed in 1966 and Orangewood Avenue Undercrossing constructed in 1977 or earlier). The on-site bridge structures appeared to be in fair condition and no visible evidence to suggest the release of ACMs into the environment was Section 6.0 | Evaluation Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 6-2 observed. Therefore, it is Michael Baker’s opinion that the on-site bridge structures have not resulted in a REC on the subject site as a result of ACMs. Lead-Based Paints Until 1978, when the U.S Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) phased out the sale and distribution of residential paint containing lead, many homes were treated with paint containing some amount of lead. It is estimated that over 80 percent of all housing built prior to 1978 contains some LBP. The mere presence of lead in paint may not constitute a material to be considered hazardous. In fact, if in good condition (no flaking or pealing), most intact LBP is not considered to be a hazardous material. In poor condition LBPs can create a potential health hazard for building occupants, especially children. As LBPs are commonly known to be used in building materials for bridge structures, LBPs may be present in association with guard railings on the on- site bridge structures. The on-site bridge structures appeared to be in fair condition and no visible evidence to suggest the release of LBPs into the environment was observed. Therefore, it is Michael Baker’s opinion that the on-site bridge structures have not resulted in a REC on the subject site as a result of LBPs. 6.1.1.2 Traffic Striping Material LBPs were commonly used in traffic striping materials before the discontinued use of lead chromate pigment in traffic striping/marking materials and hot-melt Thermoplastic stripe materials (discontinued in 1996 and 2004, respectively). Michael Baker observed traffic striping along Orangewood Avenue during the September 13, 2017 site visit. Thus, LBPs may be present within traffic striping. Traffic striping was noted to be in good condition. On-site traffic striping is currently contained, with no visible evidence to suggest the release of LBPs into the environment. Therefore, it is Michael Baker’s opinion that the likely presence of LBPs in the traffic striping materials has not resulted in a REC at the time of this Phase I ESA. 6.1.1.3 Orange County Flood Control District ROW The proposed project would require partial acquisition of land within the OCFCD ROW. These areas of acquisition are not associated with private property and no addresses apply. The Santa Ana River is lined with cement and, as a result, no residual soil contamination from surface flows is anticipated. Further, the subject site has not been reported in any regulatory databases reported by EDR. No evidence of hazardous materials was observed during the September 13, 2017 site visit. Based on the information reviewed as part of this Phase I ESA, it is the opinion of Michael Baker that these areas of acquisition have not resulted in a REC at the time of this Phase I ESA. Section 6.0 | Evaluation Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 6-3 6.1.2 PAST ON-SITE USES Based upon the evaluation of documented land use as demonstrated in the resources reviewed as part of this Phase I ESA, the subject site appears to have consisted of vacant land, water-related uses (Santa Ana River), and agricultural uses prior to the 1960’s. No past on-site structures were documented in the resources reviewed. Available public records provided by EDR were reviewed by Michael Baker on August 23, 2017. The lists that were reviewed did not report any regulatory properties within the boundaries of the subject site. Therefore, no known corrective action, restoration, or remediation has been planned, is currently taking place, or has been completed on the subject site. The subject site has not been under investigation for violation on any environmental laws, regulations, or standards, as identified in the databases reported by EDR. The following are Michael Baker’s findings regarding past on-site uses. 6.1.2.1 Aerially Deposited Lead Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) refers to lead deposited on highway shoulders from past leaded fuel vehicle emissions. According to the Caltrans ADL webpage,1 although lead was banned as a fuel additive in California beginning in 1992, ADL may still be present in soils adjacent to highways in use prior to that time. Based on historical aerial photographs and USGS topographic maps, SR-57 was constructed in 1977. Thus, it is anticipated that SR-57, in the vicinity of the subject site, has been utilized by a high volume of traffic since then. The potential for lead contamination to exist within exposed soils on-site due to aerially deposited lead is likely. It is Michael Baker’s opinion that there is a REC on the subject site as a result of ADL. 6.1.2.2 Agricultural Uses Based upon evaluation of the documented land use as demonstrated in the reviewed resources, the series of historical aerial photographs and maps, and the site inspection, the subject site appears to have been historically utilized for agricultural purposes (row crops within the eastern portion of the subject site from approximately the 1930’s through the 1960’s). Therefore, a combination of several commonly used pesticides (i.e., Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane [DDD], Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane [DDT], Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene [DDE]), which are now banned, may have been used throughout the subject site. The historical use of agricultural pesticides may have resulted in pesticide residues of certain persistence in soil at concentrations 1 Soil Management Agreement for Aerially Deposited Lead-Contaminated Soils (effective July 1, 2016). Aerially Deposited Lead. California Department of Transportation. Accessible online at (http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/haz/hw_adl.htm). Accessed September 28, 2017. Section 6.0 | Evaluation Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 6-4 that are considered to be hazardous based on established federal regulatory levels. The primary concern with historical pesticide residues is human health risk from inadvertent ingestion of contaminated soil, particularly by children. The presence of moderately elevated pesticide residuals in soil presents potential health and marketplace concerns. Although the subject site historically included agricultural uses, since then SR-57 and other transportation uses, as well as commercial uses in the surrounding area were constructed, disturbing these past agricultural uses (in the 1960’s and 1970’s). Thus, due to the highly disturbed and developed condition of this area, it is the opinion of Michael Baker that the presence of residual herbicide/pesticide contamination in on-site surface soils is unlikely and no REC has resulted in this regard. 6.1.3 CURRENT ADJOINING PROPERTIES Adjoining uses include transportation, commercial, and water-related uses (Santa Ana River). During a preliminary observation of adjoining properties from public thoroughfares, no visible or physical evidence was observed to suggest that a surface release of petroleum-based or hazardous materials or waste have recently occurred. No unusual or suspicious materials handling or storage practices were observed with respect to adjoining properties. Further, no adjoining properties are listed in a regulatory database, as searched by EDR, indicative of a release. The following is a discussion of Michael Baker’s findings pertaining to adjoining properties reported to have UST: 6.1.3.1 2211 West Orangewood Avenue The property located at 2211 West Orangewood Avenue was listed for having an UST. However, based on the files reviewed at the OCHCA, this address was reported incorrectly by EDR and should be 2211 East Orangewood Avenue, which does not adjoin the subject site. As this site is not adjoining the subject site, but is actually situated greater than 1,400 feet west of the subject site, this property is no longer of concern. It is the opinion of Michael Baker that this property has not resulted in a REC. 6.1.3.2 2400 East Orangewood Avenue According to EDR, the adjoining property 2400 East Orangewood Avenue (Fire Station Training Center) had a historical UST containing diesel fuel. EDR has reported this tank as removed. No UST files are maintained by the OCHCA for this facilty. Further, no releases have been reported Section 6.0 | Evaluation Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 6-5 by EDR. Thus, based on the information reviewed as part of this Phase I ESA, it is Michael Baker’s opinion that this adjoining property has not resulted in a REC at the time of this Phase I ESA. 6.1.4 PAST ADJOINING USES Past adjoining properties consisted of vacant land and agricultural uses. These past adjoining properties were not identified on any of the standard environmental record sources or other files indicative of a release. No known corrective action, restoration, remediation has been planned, is currently taking place, or has been completed on past properties adjoining the subject site. Past properties adjoining the subject site have not been under investigation for violation of any environmental laws, regulations, or standards, as identified in the databases reported by EDR. Therefore, it is Michael Baker’s opinion that past adjoining properties have not resulted in a REC at the time of this Phase I ESA. 6.1.5 CURRENT AND PAST ADJACENT USES Current and past adjacent uses consist of vacant land, agricultural, commercial, residential, and transportation uses. Multiple adjacent properties were listed in multiple regulatory databases involving hazardous materials. However, based on the information reviewed as part of this Phase I ESA, no reported adjacent regulatory properties have been identified that also present a potential concern to groundwater underlying the subject site, other than the properties listed below. Apart from the properties listed below, the reported adjacent regulatory properties are considered to have a low potential of affecting the subject site for one or more of the following reasons: distance from the subject site, direction of anticipated groundwater flow, site status, and/or no contamination has been reported. 700 North Eckhoff Street: This property reported a release to soil and was closed by the RWQCB on November 10, 2009. However, the case closure letter identified groundwater contamination at this property (which is only 588 feet up-gradient of the subject site) as a result of the off-site property 2023 West Collins Street (which is situated approximately 2,420 feet up gradient from the subject site). Based on this information, it is the opinion of Michael Baker that the facility located at 700 North Eckhoff Street has not resulted in a REC on the subject site. 2023 Collins Street: This off-site property (situated approximately 2,420 feet up gradient from the subject site) reported a release of TCA, PCE, and TCE to soil and groundwater. A VES was installed in 1996 and since 1996, approximately 2,000 pounds of VOCs have been removed through this process. As VES was no longer effective in removing residual VOCs from the soil and the site being consistent with the RWQCB’s low threat policy, this case was closed on April 7, 2005. Section 6.0 | Evaluation Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 6-6 Based on the files reviewed as part of 700 North Eckhoff Street, groundwater down-gradient this property as far as 6,500 feet remain impacted by this release (although case closure has been achieved). As the subject site is located within this impact area, it is the opinion of Michael Baker that a REC as a result of groundwater contamination exists. 6.1.7 DATA GAPS A data gap is a lack of or inability to obtain information required by the ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice despite good faith efforts by the Environmental Professional to gather such information. Data gaps may result from incompleteness in any of the activities required by this practice, including but not limited to site reconnaissance (for example, an inability to conduct the site visit) and interviews (for example, an inability to interview the key site manager, regulatory officials, etc.). A data gap by itself is not inherently significant. For example, if a property’s historical use is not identified back to 1940 because of data failure, but the earliest source shows that the property was undeveloped, this data gap by itself would not be significant. A data gap is only significant if other information and/or professional experience raises reasonable concerns involving the data gap. For example, if a building on the property is inaccessible during the site visit, and the Environmental Professional’s experience indicates that such a building often involves activity that leads to an REC, the inability to inspect the building would be a significant data gap warranting comment. No significant data gaps were noted during the course of the Phase I ESA. Refer to Section 6.3, Limiting Conditions/Deviations, below. 6.2 CONCLUSIONS Michael Baker has performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E 1527-13 Standard Practice of the Orangewood Avenue Improvements project, located within the cities of Anaheim and Orange, Orange County, California, the subject site. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 6.3, Limiting Conditions/Deviations, of this Phase I ESA. This Phase I ESA has revealed evidence of the following RECs in connection with the subject site: Aerially Deposited Lead: Based on historical aerial photographs and USGS topographic maps, SR-57 was constructed in 1977. The potential for lead contamination to exist within exposed soils Section 6.0 | Evaluation Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 6-7 on-site due to aerially deposited lead is likely. It is Michael Baker’s opinion that there is a REC on the subject site as a result of aerially deposited lead. Groundwater Contamination: The adjacent property located at 2023 Collins Street (approximately 2,420 feet up gradient of the subject site) was found to have groundwater contamination extending to a maximum distance of 6,500 feet down gradient, which includes the subject site and areas of propose ROW acquisition. As such, it is the opinion of Michael Baker that a REC has resulted via groundwater from the adjacent regulatory property located at 2023 Collins Street. It is acknowledged that groundwater is anticipated to be greater than 80 feet below ground surface. 6.3 LIMITING CONDITIONS / DEVIATIONS No interviews with current/past property owners or local government officials were conducted. Based on available information reviewed as part of this Phase I ESA, past and current on-site uses appeared to historically consist of the Santa Ana River, past agricultural uses, and transportation uses. No evidence to suggest other uses was noted. Based on the historical documentation reviewed, it is Michael Baker’s opinion that these interviews would not increase the knowledge of the Environmental Professional such that the conclusions of this Phase I ESA would change. Thus, it is the opinion of Michael Baker that this deviation is not a significant data gap. No additional scope items, or items outside of the scope of a Phase I ESA E 1527-13 Standard Practice, were conducted as part of this Phase I ESA. Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 7-1 SECTION 7.0 REFERENCES Anthony J. Buonicore, Methodology for Identifying the Area of Concern Around a Property Potentially Impacted by Vapor Migration from Nearby Contaminated Sources, Paper 2011-A-301-AWMA, June 2011. ASTM International, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, Designation: E 1527-13. City of Anaheim, General Plan for the City of Anaheim California, May 2004. City of Orange, Orange General Plan, March 2010. County of Orange Health Care Agency, File Review Request, sent on August 28, 2017. Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Resources, Well Finder Application, http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dog/Pages/Wellfinder.aspx, accessed on August 30, 2017. Environmental Data Resources, Inc., Certified Sanborn Map Report, dated August 22, 2017. Environmental Data Resources, Inc., EDR City Directory Image Report, dated August 23, 2017. Environmental Data Resources, Inc., EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package, dated August 23, 2017. Environmental Data Resources, Inc., EDR Historical Topo Map Report, dated August 22, 2017. Environmental Data Resources, Inc., EDR Radius Map Report with GeoCheck, dated August 22, 2017. Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Rate Map, Map Number 06059C0142J, revised December 3, 2009. Fire Review at the Orange County Health Care Agency, conducted on October 3, 2017. Site Visit, conducted on September 13, 2017. Section 7.0 | References Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | 7-2 The Planning Center, The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339, August 2010. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey, http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/, accessed August 28, 2017. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Map of Radon Zones, dated 1993. USGS Topographic Quadrangle, Anaheim Quadrangle, California, dated 2015. APPENDICES APPENDIX A: ASTM TERMINOLOGY Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | A-1 TERMINOLOGY The following definitions and descriptions of terms are from the ASTM E1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. Abandoned property – property that can be presumed to be deserted, or an intent to relinquish possession or control can be inferred from the general disrepair or lack of activity thereon such that a reasonable person could believe that there was an intent on the part of the current owner to surrender rights to the property. Activity and use limitations – legal or physical restrictions or limitations on the use of, or access to, a site or facility: (1) to reduce or eliminate potential exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil, soil vapor, groundwater, and/or surface water on the property, or (2) to prevent activities that could interfere with the effectiveness of a response action, in order to ensure maintenance of a condition of no significant risk to public health or the environment. These legal or physical restrictions, which may include institutional and/or engineering controls, are intended to prevent adverse impacts to individuals or populations that may be exposed to hazardous substances and petroleum products in the soil, soil vapor, groundwater, and/or surface water on the property. See Note 1. NOTE 1 — the term AUL is taken from Guide E2091 to include both legal (that is, institutional) and physical (that is, engineering) controls within its scope. Other agencies, organizations, and jurisdictions may define or utilize these terms differently (for example, EPA and California do not include physical controls within their definitions of “institutional controls.” Department of Defense and International County/City Management Association use “Land Use Controls.” The term ‘land use restrictions” is used but not defined in the Brownfields Amendments). Actual knowledge – the knowledge actually possessed by an individual who is a real person, rather than an entity. Actual knowledge is to be distinguished from constructive knowledge that is knowledge imputed to an individual or entity. Adjoining properties – any real property or properties the border of which is contiguous or partially contiguous with that of the property, or that would be contiguous or partially contiguous with that of the property but for a street, road, or other public thoroughfare separating them. Appendix A | ASTM Terminology Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | A-2 Aerial photographs – photographs taken from an aerial platform with sufficient resolution to allow identification of development and activities of areas encompassing the property. Aerial photographs are often available from government agencies or private collections unique to a local area. All appropriate inquiry – that inquiry constituting “all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice” as defined in CERCLA. 42 U.S.C. §9601(35)(B), that will qualify a party to a commercial real estate transaction for one of threshold criteria for satisfying the LLPs to CERCLA liability (42 U.S.C. §9601(35)(A) & (B), §9607(b)(3), §(9607(q); and §9607(r)), assuming compliance with other elements of the defense. Approximate minimum search distance – the area for which records must be obtained and reviewed pursuant to Section 8 subject to the limitations provided in that section. This may include areas outside the property and shall be measured from the nearest property boundary. This term is used in lieu of radius to include irregularly shaped properties. Bona fide prospective purchaser liability protection – (42 U.S.C. §9607(r) – a person may qualify as a bona fide prospective purchaser if, among other requirements, such person made “all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses of the facility in accordance with generally accepted good commercial and customary standards and practices.” Knowledge of contamination resulting from all appropriate inquiry would not generally preclude this liability protection. A person must make all appropriate inquiries on or before the date of purchase. The facility must have been purchased after January 11, 2002. Brownfields Amendments – amendments to CERCLA pursuant to the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act, Pub. L. No. 107-118 (2002), 42 U.S.C. §§9601 et. seq. Building department records – those records of the local government in which the property is located indicating permission of the local government to construct, alter, or demolish improvements on the property. Often building department records are located in the building department of a municipality or county. Business environmental risk – a risk which can have a material environmental or environmentally-driven impact on the business associated with the current or planned use of a parcel of commercial real estate, not necessarily limited to those environmental issues required to be investigated in this practice. Consideration of business Appendix A | ASTM Terminology Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | A-3 environmental risk issues may involve addressing one or more non-scope considerations, some of which are identified in Section 13. Commercial real estate – any real property except a dwelling or property with no more than four dwelling units exclusively for residential use (except that a dwelling or property with no more than four dwelling units exclusively for residential use is included in this term when it has a commercial function, as in the building of such dwellings for profit). This term includes but is not limited to undeveloped real property and real property used for industrial, retail, office, agricultural, other commercial, medical, or educational purposes: property used for residential purposes that has more than four residential dwelling units; and property with no more than four dwelling units for residential use when it has a commercial function, as in the building of such dwellings for profit. Commercial and real estate transaction – a transfer of title to or possession of real property or receipt of a security interest in real property, except that it does not include transfer of title to or possession of real property or the receipt of a security interest in real property or the receipt of a security interest in real property with respect to an individual dwelling or building containing fewer than five dwelling units, nor does it include the purchase of a lot or lots to construct a dwelling for occupancy by a purchaser, but a commercial real estate transaction does include real property purchased or leased by persons or entities in the business of building or developing dwelling units. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) – the list of sites compiled by EPA that EPA has investigated or is currently investigating for potential hazardous substance contamination for possible inclusion on the National Priorities List. Construction debris – concrete, brick, asphalt, and other such building materials discarded in the construction of a building or other improvement to property. Contaminated public wells – public wells used for drinking water that have been designated by a government entity as contaminated by hazardous substances (for example, chlorinated solvents), or as having water unsafe to drink without treatment. Contiguous property owner liability protection – (42 U.S.C. §9607(q) – a person may qualify for the contiguous property owner liability protection if, among other requirements, such person owns real property that is contiguous to, and that is or may be contaminated by hazardous substances from other real property that is not owned by that person. Furthermore, such person conducted all appropriate inquiries at the time of acquisition of Appendix A | ASTM Terminology Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | A-4 the property and did not know or have reason to know that the property was or could be contaminated by a release or threatened release from the contiguous property. The all appropriate inquiries must not result in knowledge of contamination. If it does, then such person did “know” or “had reason to know” of contamination and would not be eligible for the contiguous property owner liability protection. See Appendix X1 for the other necessary requirements that are beyond the scope of this practice. Controlled recognized environmental condition – a recognized environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (for example, as evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria established by regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). (See Note 2). A condition considered by the environmental professional to be controlled recognized environmental condition shall be listed in the findings section of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report, and as a recognized environmental condition in the conclusions section of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report. (See Note 3). Note 2 — For example, if a leaking underground storage tank has been cleaned up to a commercial use standard, but does not meet unrestricted residential cleanup criteria, this would be considered a controlled recognized environmental condition. The “control” is represented by the restriction that the property use remains commercial. Note 3 — A condition identified as a controlled recognized environmental condition does not imply that the environmental professional has evaluated or confirmed the adequacy, implementation, or continued effectiveness of the required control that has been, or is intended to be implemented. CORRACTS list – a list maintained by EPA of hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities and other RCRA-regulated facilities (due to past interim status or storage of hazardous waste beyond 90 days) that have been notified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to undertake corrective action under RCRA. The CORRACTS list is a subset of the EPA database that manages RCRA data. Data failure – a failure to achieve the historical research objectives in 8.3.1 through 8.3.2.2 even after reviewing the standard historical sources 8.3.4.1 through 8.3.4.8 that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful. Data failure is one type of data gap. See 8.3.2.3. Appendix A | ASTM Terminology Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | A-5 Data gap – a lack of or inability to obtain information required by this practice despite good faith efforts by the environmental professional to gather such information. Data gaps may result from incompleteness in any of the activities required by this practice, including, but not limited to site reconnaissance (for example, an inability to conduct the site visit), and interviews (for example, an inability to interview the key site manager, regulatory officials, etc.). See 12.7. Demolition debris – concrete, brick, asphalt, and other such building materials discarded in the demolition of a building or other improvement to property. De minimis condition – a condition that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Conditions determined to be de minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions nor controlled recognized environmental conditions. Drum – a container (typically, but not necessarily, holding 55 gal (208 L) of liquid) that may be used to store hazardous substances or petroleum products. Dry wells – underground areas where soil has been removed and replaced with pea gravel, coarse sand, or large rocks. Dry wells are used for drainage, to control storm runoff, for the collection of spilled liquids (intentional and non-intentional) and wastewater disposal (often illegal). Due diligence – the process of inquiring into the environmental characteristics of a parcel of commercial real estate or other conditions, usually in connection with a commercial real estate transaction. The degree and kind of due diligence vary for different properties and differing purposes. See Appendix X1. Dwelling – structure or portion thereof used for residential habitation. Engineering controls (EC) – physical modifications to a site or facility (for example, capping, slurry walls, or point of use water treatment) to reduce or eliminate the potential for exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on the property. Engineering controls are a type of activity and use limitation (AUL). Environment – environment shall have the same meaning as the definition of environment in CERCLA 42 U.S.C. § 9601 (8). For additional background information, see Legal Appendix (Appendix X1) to section XI. 1.1 “Releases and Threatened Release.” Appendix A | ASTM Terminology Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | A-6 Environmental compliance audit – the investigative process to determine if the operations of an existing facility are in compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. This term should not be used to describe this practice, although an environmental compliance audit may include an environmental site assessment or, if prior audits are available, may be part of an environmental site assessment. Environmental lien – a charge, security, or encumbrance upon title to a property to secure the payment of a cost, damage, debt, obligation, or duty arising out of response actions, cleanup, or other remediation of hazardous substances or petroleum products upon a property, including (but not limited to) liens imposed pursuant to CERCLA 42 U.S.C. §§9607(1) & 9607(r) and similar state or local laws. Environmental professional – a person meeting the education, training, and experience requirements as set forth in 40 CFR §312.10(b). For the convenience of the reader, this section is reprinted in Appendix X2. The person may be an independent contractor or an employee of the user. Environmental site assessment (ESA) – the process by which a person or entity seeks to determine if a particular parcel of real property (including improvements) is subject to recognized environmental conditions. At the option of the user, an environmental site assessment may include more inquiry than that constituting all appropriate inquiries or, if the user is not concerned about qualifying for the LLPs, less inquiry than that constituting all appropriate inquiries. An environmental site assessment is both different from and often less rigorous than an environmental compliance audit. ERNS list – EPA’s emergency response notification system list of reported CERCLA hazardous substance releases or spills in quantities greater than the reportable quantity, as maintained at the National Response center. Notification requirements for such releases or spills are codified in 40 CFR Parts 302 and 335. Federal Register (FR) – publication of the United States government published daily (except for federal holidays and weekends) containing all proposed and final regulations and some other activities of the Federal Government. When regulations become final, they are included in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), as well as published in the Federal Register. Fill dirt – dirt, soil, sand, or other earth, that is obtained off-site, that is used to fill holes or depressions, create mounds, or otherwise artificially change the grade or elevation or real Appendix A | ASTM Terminology Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | A-7 property. It does not include material that is used in limited quantities for normal landscaping activities. Fire insurance maps – maps produced for private fire insurance map companies that indicate uses of properties at specified dates and that encompass the property. These maps are often available at local libraries, historical societies, private resellers, or from the map companies who produced them. Good faith – the absence of any intention to seek an unfair advantage or to defraud another party; an honest and sincere intention to fulfill one’s obligations in the conduct or transaction concerned. Hazardous substance – a substance defined as a hazardous substance pursuant to CERCLA 42 U.S.C. §9601(14), as interpreted by EPA regulations and the courts: “(A) any substance designated pursuant to section 1321(b)(2)(A) of Title 33, (B) any element, compound, mixture, solution, or substance designated pursuant to section 9602 of this title, (C) any hazardous waste having the characteristics identified under or listed pursuant to section 3001 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), as amended, (42 U.S.C. §6921) (but not including any waste the regulation of which under RCRA (42 U.S.C. §§6901 et seq.) has been suspended by Act of Congress, (D) any toxic pollutant listed under section 1317(a) of Title 33, (E) any hazardous air pollutant listed under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. §7412), and (F) any imminently hazardous chemical substance or mixture with respect to which the Administrator (of EPA) has taken action pursuant to section 2606 of Title 15. The term does not include petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof which is not otherwise specifically listed or designated as a hazardous substance under subparagraphs (A) through (F) of this paragraph, and the term does not include natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas, or synthetic gas usable for fuel (or mixtures of natural gas and such synthetic gas).” (See Appendix X1.) Hazardous waste – any hazardous waste having the characteristics identified under or listed pursuant to section 3001 of RCRA, as amended, (42 U.S.C. §6921) (but not including any waste the regulation of which under RCRA (42 U.S.C. §§6901-6992(k) has been suspended by Act of Congress). RCRA is sometimes also identified as the Solid Waste Disposal Act. RCRA defines a hazardous waste, at 42 U.S.C. §6903, as: “a solid waste, or combination of solid wastes, which because of its quantity, concentration, or physical, chemical, or infectious characteristics may – (A) cause, or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible, or incapacitating reversible, illness; or (B) Appendix A | ASTM Terminology Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | A-8 pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, or disposed of, or otherwise managed.” Hazardous waste/contaminated sites – sites on which a release has occurred, or is suspected to have occurred, of any hazardous substance, hazardous waste, or petroleum products, and that release or suspected release has been reported to a government entity. Historical recognized environmental condition – a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). Before calling the past release a historical recognized environmental condition, the environmental professional must determine whether the past release is a recognized environmental condition at the time the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is conducted (for example, if there has been a change in the regulatory criteria). If the EP considers the past release to be a recognized environmental condition at the time the Phase I ESA is conducted, the condition shall be included in the conclusions section of the report as a recognized environmental condition. IC/EC registries – databases of institutional controls or engineering controls that may be maintained by a federal, state or local environmental agency for purposes of tracking sites that may contain residual contamination and AULs. The names for these may vary from program to program and state to state, and include terms such as Declaration of Environmental Use Restriction database (Arizona), list of “deed restrictions” (California), environmental real covenants list (Colorado), brownfields site list (Indiana, Missouri, Pennsylvania), and the Pennsylvania Activity and Use Limitation (PA AUL) Registry. Innocent landowner defense – (42 U.S.C. §§9601(35) and 9607(b)(3)) – a person may qualify as one of three types of innocent landowners: (i) a person who “did not know and had no reason to know” that contamination existed on the property at the time the purchaser acquired the property; (ii) a government entity which acquired the property by escheat, or through any other involuntary transfer or acquisition, or through the exercise of eminent domain authority by purchase or condemnation; and (iii) a person who “acquired the facility by inheritance or bequest.” To qualify for the first type of innocent landowner defense, such person must have made all appropriate inquiries on or before the date of purchase. Furthermore, the all appropriate inquiry must not have resulted in knowledge of the contamination. If it does, then such person did “know” or “had reason to know” of contamination and would not be eligible for the innocent landowner defense. See Appendix A | ASTM Terminology Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | A-9 Appendix X1 for the other necessary requirements that are beyond the scope of this practice. Institutional controls (IC) – a legal or administrative restriction (for example, “deed restrictions,” restrictive covenants, easements, or zoning) on the use of, or access to, a site or facility to (1) reduce or eliminate potential exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on the property, or (2) to prevent activities that could interfere with the effectiveness of a response action, in order to ensure maintenance of a condition of no significant risk to public health or the environment. An institutional control is a type of Activity and Use Limitation (AUL). Interviews – those portions of this practice that are contained in Section 10 and 11 thereof and address questions to be asked of past and present owners, operators, and occupants of the property and questions to be asked of local government officials. Key site manager – the person identified by the owner or operator of a property as having good knowledge of the uses and physical characteristics of the property. See 10.5.1. Landfill – a place, location, tract of land, area, or premises used for the disposal of solid wastes as defined by state solid waste regulations. The term is synonymous with the term solid waste disposal site and is also known as a garbage dump, trash dump, or similar term. Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) – landowner liability protections under CERCLA; these protections include the bona fide prospective purchaser liability protection, contiguous property owner liability protection, and innocent landowner defense from CERCLA liability. See 42 U.S.C. §§9601(35)(A), 9601(40), 9607(b), 9607(q), 9607(r). Local government agencies – those agencies of municipal or county government having jurisdiction over the property. Municipal and county government agencies include but are not limited to cities, parishes, townships, and similar entities. Local street directories – directories published by private (or sometimes government) sources that show ownership, occupancy, and/or use of sites by reference to street addresses. Often local street directories are available at libraries, or historical societies, and/or local municipal offices. See 8.3.4.6 of this practice. LUST sites – state lists of leaking underground storage tank sites. RCRA gives EPA and states, under cooperative agreements with EPA, authority to clean up releases from UST systems or require owners and operators to do so. (42 U.S.C. §6991b). Appendix A | ASTM Terminology Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | A-10 Major occupants – those tenants, subtenants, or other persons or entities each of which uses at least 40% of the leasable area of the property or any anchor tenant when the property is a shopping center. Material safety data sheet (MSDS) – written or printed material concerning a hazardous substance which is prepared by chemical manufacturers, importers, and employers for hazardous chemicals pursuant to OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard, 29 C.F.R. §1910.1200. Material threat – A physically observable or obvious threat which is reasonably likely to lead to a release that, in the opinion of the environmental professional, is threatening and might result in impact to public health or the environment. An example might include an aboveground storage tank system that contains a hazardous substance and which shows evidence of damage. The damage would represent a material threat if it is deemed serious enough that it may cause or contribute to tank integrity failure with release of contents to the environment. Migrate/migration – for the purposes of this practice, “migrate” and “migration” refers to the movement of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form, including, for example, solid and liquid at the surface or subsurfaces, and vapor in the subsurface. See Note 4. Note 4 — Vapor migration in the subsurface is described in Guide E2600; however, nothing in this practice should be construed to require application of the Guide E2600 standard to achieve compliance with all appropriate inquiries. National Contingency Plan (NCP) – the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan, found at 40 C.F.R. Part 300, that is the EPA’s blueprint on how hazardous substances are to be cleaned up pursuant to CERCLA. National Priorities List (NPL) – list compiled by EPA pursuant to CERCLA 42 U.S.C. §9605(a)(8)(B) of properties with the highest priority for cleanup pursuant to EPA’s Hazard Ranking System. See 40 C.F.R. Part 300. Obvious – that which is plain or evident; a condition or fact that could not be ignored or overlooked by a reasonable observer while visually or physically observing the property. Appendix A | ASTM Terminology Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | A-11 Occupants – those tenants, subtenants, or other persons or entities using the property or a portion of the property. Operator – the person responsible for the overall operation of a facility. Other historical sources – any source or sources other than those designated in Sections 8.3.4.1 through 8.3.4.8 that are credible to a reasonable person and that identify past uses of the property. The term includes, but is not limited to: miscellaneous maps, newspaper archives, internet sites, community organizations, local libraries, historical societies, current owners or occupants of neighboring properties, and records in the files and/or personal knowledge of the property owner and/or occupants. See 8.3.4.9. Owner – generally the fee owner of record of the property. Petroleum exclusion – the exclusion from CERCLA liability provided in 42 U.S.C. §9601(14), as interpreted by the courts and EPA: “The term (hazardous substance) does not include petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof which is not otherwise specifically listed or designated as a hazardous substance under subparagraphs (A) through (F) of this paragraph, and the term does not include natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas, or synthetic gas usable for fuel (or mixtures of natural gas and such synthetic gas).” Petroleum products – those substances included within the meaning of the petroleum exclusion to CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §9601(14), as interpreted by the courts and EPA, that is: petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof which is not otherwise specifically listed or designated as a hazardous substance under Subparagraphs (A) through (F) of 42 U.S.C. §9601(14), natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas, and synthetic gas usable for fuel (or mixtures of natural gas and such synthetic gas). (The word fraction refers to certain distillates of crude oil, including gasoline, kerosene, diesel oil, jet fuels, and fuel oil, pursuant to Standard Definitions of Petroleum Statistics. ) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment – the process described in this practice. Physical setting sources – sources that provide information about the geologic, hydrogeologic, hydrologic, or topographic characteristics of a property. See 8.2.4. Pits, ponds, or lagoons – man-made or natural depressions in a ground surface that are likely to hold liquids or sludge containing hazardous substances or petroleum products. The likelihood of such liquids or sludge being present is determined by evidence of factors Appendix A | ASTM Terminology Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | A-12 associated with the pit, pond, or lagoon, including, but not limited to, discolored water, distressed vegetation, or the presence of an obvious wastewater discharge. Practically reviewable – information that is practically reviewable means that the information is provided by the source in a manner and in a form that, upon examination, yields information relevant to the property without the need for extraordinary analysis of irrelevant data. The form of the information shall be such that the user can review the records for a limited geographic area. Records that cannot be feasibly retrieved by reference to the location of the property or a geographic area in which the property is located are not generally practically reviewable. Most databases of public records are practically reviewable if they can be obtained from the source agency by the county, city, zip code, or other geographic area of the facilities listed in the record system. Records that are sorted, filed, organized, or maintained by the source agency only chronologically are not generally practically reviewable. Listings in publicly available records which do not have adequate address information to be located geographically are not generally considered practically reviewable. For large databases with numerous records (such as RCRA hazardous waste generators and registered underground storage tanks), the records are not practically reviewable unless they can be obtained from the source agency in the smaller geographic area of zip codes. Even when information is provided by zip code for some large databases, it is common for an unmanageable number of sites to be identified within a given zip code. In these cases, it is not necessary to review the impact of all of the sites that are likely to be listed in any given zip code because that information would not be practically reviewable. In other words, when so much data is generated that it cannot be feasibly reviewed for its impact on the property, it is not practically reviewable. Property – the real property that is the subject of the environmental site assessment described in this practice. Real property includes buildings and other fixtures and improvements located on the property and affixed to the land. Property tax files – the files kept for property tax purposes by the local jurisdiction where the property is located and may include records of past ownership, appraisals, maps, sketches, photos, or other information that is reasonably ascertainable and pertaining to the property. See 8.3.4.3. Publicly available – information that is publicly available means that the source of the information allows access to the information by anyone upon request. Appendix A | ASTM Terminology Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | A-13 RCRA generators – those persons or entities that generate hazardous wastes, as defined and regulated by RCRA. RCRA generators list – list kept by EPA of those persons or entities that generate hazardous wastes as defined and regulated by RCRA. RCRA TSD facilities – those facilities on which treatment, storage, and/or disposal of hazardous wastes takes place, as defined and regulated by RCRA. RCRA TSD facilities list – list kept by EPA of those facilities on which treatment, storage, and/or disposal of hazardous wastes takes place, as defined and regulated by RCRA. Reasonably ascertainable – information that is (1) publicly available, (2) obtainable from its source within reasonable time and cost constraints, and (3) practically reviewable. Recognized environmental conditions – the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. De minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions. Recorded land title records – records of historical fee ownership, which may include leases, land contracts, and AULs on or of the property recorded in the place where land title records are, by law or custom, recorded for the local jurisdiction in which the property is located. (Often such records are kept by a municipal or county recorder or clerk.) Such records may be obtained from title companies or directly from the local government agency. Information about the title to the property that is recorded in a U.S. district court or any place other than where land title records are, by law or custom, recorded for the local jurisdiction in which the property is located, are not considered part of recorded land title records. See 8.3.4.4. Records of emergency release notifications EPCRA – (42 U.S.C. §11004) – requires operators of facilities to notify their local emergency planning committee (as defined in EPCRA) and state emergency response commission (as defined in EPCRA) and state emergency response commission (as defined in EPCRA) of any release beyond the facility’s boundary of any reportable quantity of any extremely hazardous substance. Often the local fire department is the local emergency planning committee. Records of such notifications are “Records of Emergency Release Notifications” (42 U.S.C. 11004). Appendix A | ASTM Terminology Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | A-14 Records review – that part that is contained in Section 8 of this practice which addresses records shall or may be reviewed. Release – a release of any hazardous substance or petroleum product shall have the same meaning as the definition of “release” in CERCLA 42 U.S.C. § 9601(22)). For additional background information, see Legal Appendix (Appendix X1) to X1.1.1 “Releases and Threatened Release.” Report – the written report prepared by the environmental professional and constituting part of a “Phase I Environmental Site Assessment,” as required by this practice. Site reconnaissance – that part that is contained in Section 9 of this practice and addresses what should be done in connection with the site visit. The site reconnaissance includes, but is not limited to, the site visit done in connection with such a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Site visit – the visit to the property during which observations are made constituting the site reconnaissance section of this practice. Solid waste disposal site – a place, location, tract of land, area, or premises used for the disposal of solid wastes as defined by state solid waste regulations. The term is synonymous with the term landfill and is also known as a garbage dump, trash dump, or similar term. Solvent – a chemical compound that is capable of dissolving another substance and may itself be a hazardous substance, used in a number of manufacturing/industrial processes including but not limited to the manufacture of paints and coatings for industrial and household purpose, equipment clean-up, and surface degreasing in metal fabricating industries. Standard environmental record sources – those records specified in Section 8.2.1. Standard historical sources – those sources of information about the history of uses of property specified in Section 8.3.4. Standard physical setting source – a current (USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (if any) showing the area on which the property is located. Standard practice – the activities set forth in this practice. Appendix A | ASTM Terminology Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | A-15 Standard sources – sources of environmental, physical setting, or historical records specified in section 8 of this practice. State registered USTs – state lists of underground storage tanks required to be registered under Subtitle I, Section 9002 of RCRA. Sump – a pit, cistern, cesspool, or similar receptacle where liquids drain, collect, or are stored. TSD facility – treatment, storage, or disposal facility (see RCRA TSD facilities). Underground injection – the emplacement or discharge of fluids into the subsurface by means of a well, improved sinkhole, sewage drain hole, subsurface fluid distribution system or other system, or groundwater point source. Underground storage tank (UST) – any tank, including underground piping connected to the tank, that is or has been used to contain hazardous substances or petroleum products and the volume of which is 10% or more beneath the surface of the ground. User – the party seeking to use Practice E1527 to complete and environmental site assessment of the property. A user may include, without limitation, a potential purchaser of property, a potential tenant of property, an owner of property, a lender, or a property manager. The user has specific obligations for completing a successful application of this practice as outlined in Section 6. USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map – the map (if any) available from or produced by the United States Geological Survey entitled “USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map,” and showing the property. Visually and/or physically observed – during a site visit pursuant to this practice, this term means observations made by vision while walking through a property and the structures located on it and observations made by the sense of smell, particularly observations of noxious or foul odors. The term “walking through” is not meant to imply that disabled persons who cannot physically walk may not conduct a site visit; they may do so by the means at their disposal for moving through the property and the structures located on it. Wastewater – water that (1) is or has been used in an industrial or manufacturing process, (2) conveys or has convey sewage, or (3) is directly related to manufacturing, processing, or raw materials storage areas at an industrial plant. Wastewater does not include water originating on or passing through or adjacent to a site, such as stormwater flows, that has Appendix A | ASTM Terminology Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | A-16 not been used in industrial or manufacturing processes, has not been combined with sewage, or is not directly related to manufacturing, processing, or raw materials storage areas at an industrial plant. Zoning/land use records – those records of the local government in which the property is located indicating the uses permitted by the local government in particular zones within its jurisdiction. The records may consist of maps and/or written records. They are often located in the planning department of a municipality or county. See 8.3.4.8. APPENDIX B: DATABASE RECORDS SEARCHES FORM-LBC-RG ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 Inquiry Number: 5029994.2s August 22, 2017 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 119 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-6 Physical Setting Source Map A-11 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-13 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC5029994.2s Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist fromother sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5029994.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS NA ORANGE, CA 92806 COORDINATES 33.7957810 - 33˚ 47’ 44.81’’Latitude (North): 117.8792310 - 117˚ 52’ 45.23’’Longitude (West): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 418608.1UTM X (Meters): 3739666.5UTM Y (Meters): 148 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 5641294 ANAHEIM, CATarget Property Map: 2012Version Date: 5641308 ORANGE, CAEast Map: 2012Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20140513, 20140514Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 5029994.2s Page 2 39 THE CITY PLACE NORTH 3745 WEST CHAPMAN AV ENVIROSTOR Lower 4619, 0.875, WSW 38 ITASCO 2211 EAST HOWELL STR ENVIROSTOR, SLIC Higher 4261, 0.807, NNW 37 CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SH 1800 TALBOT WAY RCRA-SQG, ENVIROSTOR, FINDS, ECHO, EMI, HAZNET,... Higher 3880, 0.735, WNW 36 INDEPENDENT FORGE CO 692 N BATAVIA ST RCRA-SQG, ENVIROSTOR, FINDS, ECHO, NPDES, WDS Higher 3860, 0.731, ENE 35 RUNNING SPRINGS ELEM 8670 RUNNING SPRINGS ENVIROSTOR, SCH Higher 3349, 0.634, SE 34 LAMCOR INC 2025 ORANGEWOOD LUST, HIST CORTESE Lower 2551, 0.483, West 33 STATEK CORP. 512 N. MAIN STREET ENVIROSTOR, EMI Higher 2483, 0.470, East H32 INLAND SPECIALTIES C 2023 WEST COLLINS AV ENVIROSTOR, SLIC Higher 2441, 0.462, NNE H31 INLAND SPECIALTIES C 2023 W COLLINS AVE SEMS-ARCHIVE, RCRA-SQG, HAZNET, HIST CORTESE Higher 2441, 0.462, NNE H30 VOC INVESTIGATION 2033 COLLINS Cortese, ENF, HIST CORTESE Higher 2381, 0.451, NNE G29 EVEREST ELECTRONIC 2100 ORANGEWOOD LUST Lower 1923, 0.364, West G28 EVEREST ELECTRONIC 2100 ORANGEWOOD LUST, HIST CORTESE Lower 1923, 0.364, West G27 GATEWAY APARTMENTS I 2020,2034,2040 & 210 ENVIROSTOR, VCP Lower 1923, 0.364, West 26 PINATA MEXICAN FOODS 2125 E ORANGEWOOD AV LUST, SWEEPS UST, HIST UST, CA FID UST, EMI, HIST... Lower 1871, 0.354, WNW F25 ARMORED TRANSPORT 1602 ORANGE GROVE AV LUST, HIST CORTESE Higher 1777, 0.337, East F24 ARMORED TRANSPORT 1602 W ORANGE GROVE LUST Higher 1777, 0.337, East F23 DATA CIRCUITS 1607 E ORANGE GROVE SEMS Higher 1722, 0.326, East F22 DATA CIRCUITS INC 1607 W ORANGE GROVE CORRACTS, RCRA-TSDF, RCRA-SQG Higher 1722, 0.326, East F21 DATA CIRCUITS INC. 1607 WEST ORANGEGROV ENVIROSTOR Higher 1722, 0.326, East F20 DATA CIRCUITSINC. 1607 W ORANGE GROVE ENVIROSTOR, Orange Co. Industrial Site, HWP Higher 1722, 0.326, East F19 STEVENS METAL FINISH 1607 W ORANGE GROVE RCRA-LQG, ENVIROSTOR Higher 1722, 0.326, East E18 PACIFIC FINISHING IN 760 N ECKHOFF ST RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 1292, 0.245, NE E17 NATIONAL OILWELL VAR 759 ECKHOFF ST. RCRA-LQG, EMI, NPDES Higher 1268, 0.240, NE 16 SERVICE MANUFACTURIN 2230 SOUTH DUPONT DR RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Lower 1171, 0.222, WSW D15 KARCHER ENVIRONMENTA 2300 E. ORANGEWOOD A HWT Lower 1034, 0.196, West D14 SANHER WIRE WHEEL IN 2300 E ORANGEWOOD RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Lower 1034, 0.196, West C13 HANDCRAFTED METAL 675 N ECKHOFF UNIT F RCRA-SQG Higher 1002, 0.190, ENE C12 TOM MC EWEN RACING 675 N ECKOFF ST UNIT RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 1002, 0.190, ENE C11 DANS MACHINE TOOL RE 675 N ECKHOFF STE F RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 1002, 0.190, ENE C10 YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTE 700 ECKHOFF STREET N SLIC Higher 950, 0.180, ENE C9 YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTE 700 N ECHOFF SWEEPS UST Higher 950, 0.180, ENE B8 YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTE 700 N ECKHOFF ST RCRA-SQG, SLIC, HIST UST, CA FID UST, CHMIRS,... Higher 842, 0.159, NE B7 YRC, INC (896) 700 N ECKHOFF ST UST Higher 842, 0.159, NE 6 LA LINDA PLAZA 1926 W ORANGEWOOD AV HIST UST Higher 730, 0.138, East A5 ANAHEIM FIRE TRAININ 2400 E ORANGEWOOD AV SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, EMI Lower 305, 0.058, WSW A4 2400 E ORANGEWOOD AV AST Lower 305, 0.058, WSW A3 FIRE STATION TRAININ 2400 E ORANGEWOOD AV HIST UST Lower 305, 0.058, WSW A2 FIRE STATION TRAININ 2400 EAST ORNAGEWOOD HIST UST Lower 305, 0.058, WSW 1 CAREMARK INFANT CARE 2211 W. ORANGEWOOD A UST Higher 211, 0.040, ENE MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: NA ORANGE, CA 92806 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 5029994.2s Page 3 43 LEA RONAL INC 642 W NICOLAS AV HIST UST, EMI, ICE, HWP Higher 5234, 0.991, ENE I42 PAMARCO GLOBAL GRAPH 1101 W. STRUCK AVE ENVIROSTOR, CHMIRS, Orange Co. Industrial Site Higher 5037, 0.954, NE I41 CADILLAC PLATING, IN 1147 W. STRUCK AVENU ENVIROSTOR, EMI, NPDES, WDS Higher 4985, 0.944, NE 40 ORANGE COUNTY ELECTR 811 WEST BARKLEY AVE ENVIROSTOR Higher 4767, 0.903, ENE MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: NA ORANGE, CA 92806 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5029994.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE State Response Sites State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5029994.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database SCH School Property Evaluation Program CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS Environmental Liens Listing LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing Orange Co. Industrial Site List of Industrial Site Cleanups SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5029994.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities EMI Emissions Inventory Data ENF Enforcement Action Listing Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data ICE ICE MINES Mines Site Location Listing MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing NPDES NPDES Permits Listing PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing PROC Certified Processors Database Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records UIC UIC Listing WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing WDS Waste Discharge System WIP Well Investigation Program Case List EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5029994.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal CERCLIS list SEMS: SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. A review of the SEMS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/07/2017 has revealed that there is 1 SEMS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DATA CIRCUITS 1607 E ORANGE GROVE E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.326 mi.) F23 60 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5029994.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. A review of the SEMS-ARCHIVE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/07/2017 has revealed that there is 1 SEMS-ARCHIVE site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ INLAND SPECIALTIES C 2023 W COLLINS AVE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.462 mi.) H31 77 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: CORRACTS is a list of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action Activity. This report shows which nationally-defined corrective action core events have occurred for every handler that has had corrective action activity. A review of the CORRACTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/12/2016 has revealed that there is 1 CORRACTS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DATA CIRCUITS INC 1607 W ORANGE GROVE E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.326 mi.) F22 56 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. A review of the RCRA-TSDF list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/12/2016 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-TSDF site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DATA CIRCUITS INC 1607 W ORANGE GROVE E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.326 mi.) F22 56 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5029994.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/12/2016 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-LQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ NATIONAL OILWELL VAR 759 ECKHOFF ST. NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.240 mi.) E17 33 RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/12/2016 has revealed that there are 7 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTE 700 N ECKHOFF ST NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.159 mi.) B8 12 DANS MACHINE TOOL RE 675 N ECKHOFF STE F ENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.190 mi.) C11 26 TOM MC EWEN RACING 675 N ECKOFF ST UNIT ENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.190 mi.) C12 27 HANDCRAFTED METAL 675 N ECKHOFF UNIT F ENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.190 mi.) C13 29 PACIFIC FINISHING IN 760 N ECKHOFF ST NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.245 mi.) E18 46 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SANHER WIRE WHEEL IN 2300 E ORANGEWOOD W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.196 mi.) D14 30 SERVICE MANUFACTURIN 2230 SOUTH DUPONT DR WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) 16 32 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/31/2017 has revealed that there are EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5029994.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 14 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ STEVENS METAL FINISH 1607 W ORANGE GROVE E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.326 mi.) F19 48 Facility Id: 71002672 Status: No Further Action DATA CIRCUITSINC. 1607 W ORANGE GROVE E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.326 mi.) F20 53 Facility Id: 80001460 Status: Active DATA CIRCUITS INC. 1607 WEST ORANGEGROV E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.326 mi.) F21 55 Facility Id: 30360005 Status: Refer: RCRA INLAND SPECIALTIES C 2023 WEST COLLINS AV NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.462 mi.) H32 81 Facility Id: 30280305 Status: Refer: RWQCB STATEK CORP. 512 N. MAIN STREET E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.470 mi.) 33 83 Facility Id: 71002448 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation RUNNING SPRINGS ELEM 8670 RUNNING SPRINGS SE 1/2 - 1 (0.634 mi.) 35 86 Facility Id: 30820003 Status: No Action Required INDEPENDENT FORGE CO 692 N BATAVIA ST ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.731 mi.) 36 89 Facility Id: 71002881 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SH 1800 TALBOT WAY WNW 1/2 - 1 (0.735 mi.) 37 96 Facility Id: 71003180 Status: Refer: Local Agency ITASCO 2211 EAST HOWELL STR NNW 1/2 - 1 (0.807 mi.) 38 103 Facility Id: 30280129 Status: Refer: RWQCB ORANGE COUNTY ELECTR 811 WEST BARKLEY AVE ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.903 mi.) 40 106 Facility Id: 30340240 Status: Refer: Other Agency CADILLAC PLATING, IN 1147 W. STRUCK AVENU NE 1/2 - 1 (0.944 mi.) I41 108 Facility Id: 71002562 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation PAMARCO GLOBAL GRAPH 1101 W. STRUCK AVE NE 1/2 - 1 (0.954 mi.) I42 113 Facility Id: 60000734 Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ GATEWAY APARTMENTS I 2020,2034,2040 & 210 W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.364 mi.) G27 68 Facility Id: 60001900 Status: Certified THE CITY PLACE NORTH 3745 WEST CHAPMAN AV WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.875 mi.) 39 105 Facility Id: 30000017 Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5029994.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 6 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ARMORED TRANSPORT 1602 W ORANGE GROVE E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.337 mi.) F24 62 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605901865 ARMORED TRANSPORT 1602 ORANGE GROVE AV E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.337 mi.) F25 63 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605901865 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PINATA MEXICAN FOODS 2125 E ORANGEWOOD AV WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.354 mi.) 26 64 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605902165 Global ID: T0605902165 EVEREST ELECTRONIC 2100 ORANGEWOOD W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.364 mi.) G28 72 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605901120 EVEREST ELECTRONIC 2100 ORANGEWOOD W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.364 mi.) G29 74 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605901120 LAMCOR INC 2025 ORANGEWOOD W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.483 mi.) 34 84 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605900895 Global ID: T0605900895 SLIC: Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the SLIC list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 3 SLIC sites within EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5029994.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTE 700 N ECKHOFF ST NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.159 mi.) B8 12 Database: SLIC REG 8, Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Facility Status: Closed YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTE 700 ECKHOFF STREET N ENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.180 mi.) C10 25 Database: SLIC, Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: SLT8R2744153 INLAND SPECIALTIES C 2023 WEST COLLINS AV NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.462 mi.) H32 81 Database: SLIC, Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: SLT8R1434141 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CAREMARK INFANT CARE 2211 W. ORANGEWOOD A ENE 0 - 1/8 (0.040 mi.) 1 8 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 03/12/2017 Facility Id: 30-030-028806 YRC, INC (896) 700 N ECKHOFF ST NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.159 mi.) B7 12 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 03/12/2017 Facility Id: 30-002-9322 AST: A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. A review of the AST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/06/2016 has revealed that there is 1 AST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ Not reported 2400 E ORANGEWOOD AV WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.058 mi.) A4 9 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. A review of the VCP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/31/2017 has revealed that there is 1 VCP EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5029994.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ GATEWAY APARTMENTS I 2020,2034,2040 & 210 W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.364 mi.) G27 68 Status: Certified Facility Id: 60001900 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 2 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTE 700 N ECHOFF ENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.180 mi.) C9 24 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 45828 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ANAHEIM FIRE TRAININ 2400 E ORANGEWOOD AV WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.058 mi.) A5 10 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 6275 HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 4 HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ LA LINDA PLAZA 1926 W ORANGEWOOD AV E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.138 mi.) 6 11 Facility Id: 00000007373 YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTE 700 N ECKHOFF ST NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.159 mi.) B8 12 Facility Id: 00000045828 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FIRE STATION TRAININ 2400 EAST ORNAGEWOOD WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.058 mi.) A2 8 FIRE STATION TRAININ 2400 E ORANGEWOOD AV WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.058 mi.) A3 8 Facility Id: 00000056748 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5029994.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14 CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there are 2 CA FID UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTE 700 N ECKHOFF ST NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.159 mi.) B8 12 Facility Id: 30001976 Status: A PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ANAHEIM FIRE TRAININ 2400 E ORANGEWOOD AV WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.058 mi.) A5 10 Facility Id: 30017749 Status: A Other Ascertainable Records Cortese: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). A review of the Cortese list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/28/2016 has revealed that there is 1 Cortese site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ VOC INVESTIGATION 2033 COLLINS NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.451 mi.) H30 75 HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 6 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ARMORED TRANSPORT 1602 ORANGE GROVE AV E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.337 mi.) F25 63 Reg Id: 083002687T VOC INVESTIGATION 2033 COLLINS NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.451 mi.) H30 75 Reg Id: 8 302777N01 INLAND SPECIALTIES C 2023 W COLLINS AVE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.462 mi.) H31 77 Reg Id: 30280305 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PINATA MEXICAN FOODS 2125 E ORANGEWOOD AV WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.354 mi.) 26 64 Reg Id: 083003184T EVEREST ELECTRONIC 2100 ORANGEWOOD W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.364 mi.) G28 72 Reg Id: 083001474T LAMCOR INC 2025 ORANGEWOOD W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.483 mi.) 34 84 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5029994.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15 Reg Id: 083001135T HWP: Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. A review of the HWP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/22/2017 has revealed that there are 2 HWP sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DATA CIRCUITSINC. 1607 W ORANGE GROVE E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.326 mi.) F20 53 EPA Id: CAD067625129 Cleanup Status: CLOSED LEA RONAL INC 642 W NICOLAS AV ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.991 mi.) 43 115 EPA Id: CAD001968361 Cleanup Status: KNOWN GENERATORS HWT: A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. A review of the HWT list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/11/2017 has revealed that there is 1 HWT site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ KARCHER ENVIRONMENTA 2300 E. ORANGEWOOD A W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.196 mi.) D15 32 Reg Num: 582 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5029994.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 3 records. Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________ METROPOLITAN RESIDENTIAL (PARCEL B ENVIROSTOR, VCP HOWELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT - ENVIROSTOR, SCH HOWELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT - ENVIROSTOR, SCH EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 6 0 k V 1 6 0 160160 1201601 6 0 160 160160 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 1 6 0 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500SEMS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 1 NR 0 1 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 7 NR NR NR 7 0 0.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ERNS State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000RESPONSE State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 14 NR 8 6 0 0 1.000ENVIROSTOR State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 6 NR NR 6 0 0 0.500LUST TC5029994.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST 3 NR NR 1 2 0 0.500SLIC State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST 2 NR NR NR 1 1 0.250UST 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WMUDS/SWAT 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HAULERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US HIST CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HIST Cal-Sites 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SCH 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Toxic Pits 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US CDL Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 2 NR NR NR 1 1 0.250SWEEPS UST 4 NR NR NR 2 2 0.250HIST UST 2 NR NR NR 1 1 0.250CA FID UST Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 2 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEED Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HMIRS TC5029994.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MCS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001Orange Co. Industrial Site 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TSCA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TRIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RAATS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PRP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PADS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MLTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001COAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ABANDONED MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FINDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ECHO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOCKET HWC 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CA BOND EXP. PLAN 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500Cortese 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CUPA Listings 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EMI 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ENF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001Financial Assurance TC5029994.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HAZNET 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICE 6 NR NR 6 0 0 0.500HIST CORTESE 2 NR 1 1 0 0 1.000HWP 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250HWT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MWMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPDES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PEST LIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PROC 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Notify 65 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WASTEWATER PITS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001WDS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250WIP EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LUST 57 0 9 26 16 6 0- Totals -- NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC5029994.2s Page 7 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.8730232Longitude: 33.7974892Latitude: ORANGE, CITY OFPermitting Agency: 30-030-028806Facility ID: UST: 211 ft. 0.040 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 152 ft. < 1/8 ORANGE, CA 92868 ENE 2211 W. ORANGEWOOD AVE. N/A 1 USTCAREMARK INFANT CARE U003782043 Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E773.pdfURL: 0002E773File Number: HIST UST: 305 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster A 0.058 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 147 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WSW 2400 EAST ORNAGEWOOD AVENUE N/A A2 HIST USTFIRE STATION TRAINING CENTER S118410137 7149995140Telephone: BOB BLYTHEContact Name: TRAINING CENTEROther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000056748Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: 305 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster A 0.058 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 147 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WSW 2400 E ORANGEWOOD AVE N/A A3 HIST USTFIRE STATION TRAINING CENTER U001578755 TC5029994.2s Page 8 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000550Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92805Owner City,St,Zip: 200 SOUTH ANAHEIM BOULEVARD, SOwner Address: CITY OF ANAHEIM-DEPARTMENT OFOwner Name: FIRE STATION TRAINING CENTER (Continued) U001578755 Not reportedEPAID: Not reportedProperty Owner Country: Not reportedProperty Owner Zip Code: Not reportedProperty Owner Stat : Not reportedProperty Owner City: Not reportedProperty Owner Mailing Address: Not reportedProperty Owner Phone: Not reportedProperty Owner Name: Not reportedOwner Country: Not reportedOwner Zip Code: Not reportedOwner State: Not reportedOwner Mail Address: Not reportedOwner Phone: Not reportedOperator Phone: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedMailing Address Zip Code: Not reportedMailing Address State: Not reportedMailing Address City: Not reportedMailing Address: Not reportedFax: Not reportedPhone: Not reportedBusiness Name: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedCERSID: 2,000Total Gallons: MERCY AIR BASE 4, ANAHEIMOwner: AnaheimCertified Unified Program Agencies: AST: 305 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster A 0.058 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 147 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA WSW 2400 E ORANGEWOOD AVE N/A A4 AST A100324386 TC5029994.2s Page 9 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 9199SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 66216Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: EMI: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92806Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 200 S ANAHEIM BLVDMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7149787304Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30017749Facility ID: CA FID UST: 1Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 08-06-92Active Date: 1000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-006275-000002SWRCB Tank Id: UNKNOWNOwner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 08-06-92Action Date: 08-06-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 4Number: 6275Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 305 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster A 0.058 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 147 ft. < 1/8 EMIANAHEIM, CA 92806 WSW CA FID UST2400 E ORANGEWOOD AVE N/A A5 SWEEPS USTANAHEIM FIRE TRAINING CENTER S101589622 TC5029994.2s Page 10 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: ANAHEIM FIRE TRAINING CENTER (Continued) S101589622 Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00004000Tank Capacity: 1979Year Installed: 02Container Num: 003Tank Num: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00004000Tank Capacity: 1979Year Installed: 03Container Num: 002Tank Num: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00004000Tank Capacity: 1979Year Installed: 01Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: ORANGE, CA 92668Owner City,St,Zip: 1926 W. ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, SUIOwner Address: LA LINDA HOMES, INC.Owner Name: 7149787331Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: CONSTRUCTION COMPANYOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000007373Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002EAB0.pdfURL: 0002EAB0File Number: HIST UST: 730 ft. 0.138 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 153 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92668 East 1926 W ORANGEWOOD AVENUE SUI N/A 6 HIST USTLA LINDA PLAZA U001577668 TC5029994.2s Page 11 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.87391Longitude: 33.79841Latitude: Orange County Environmental HealthPermitting Agency: 30-002-9322Facility ID: UST: 842 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster B 0.159 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 154 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92868 NE 700 N ECKHOFF ST N/A B7 USTYRC, INC (896)U004261827 (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.Land type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: ORANGE, CA 92667 P O BOX 5392Mailing address: CAD056591423EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92867 700 N ECKHOFF STFacility address: YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INCFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: WDS NPDES 842 ft.CHMIRSSite 2 of 2 in cluster B 0.159 mi.CA FID UST Relative: Higher Actual: 154 ft. 1/8-1/4 HIST USTORANGE, CA 92867 NE SLIC700 N ECKHOFF ST CAD056591423 B8 RCRA-SQGYELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC 1000291248 TC5029994.2s Page 12 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 10990 ROE AVE.Owner Address: YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC.Owner Name: 7149786221Telephone: ROBERT E. CARPENTERContact Name: TRUCKING COMPANYOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000045828Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0001F12F.pdfURL: 0001F12FFile Number: HIST UST: Not reportedThomas Bros Code: OR-7Location Code: Regional BoardLead Agency: TCESubstance: XXXStaff: ClosedFacility Status: GroundwaterType: SLIC REG 8: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/10/1994Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INCSite name: 09/12/1985Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC (Continued) 1000291248 TC5029994.2s Page 13 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOES Time: Not reportedOES Date: 08/01/2012OES notification: 12-4492OES Incident Number: CHMIRS: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ORANGE 92667Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 10990 ROEMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7149786221Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00045828Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30001976Facility ID: CA FID UST: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00001400Tank Capacity: 1972Year Installed: # 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1972Year Installed: # 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1972Year Installed: # 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: OVERLAND PARK, KS 66207Owner City,St,Zip: YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC (Continued) 1000291248 TC5029994.2s Page 14 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#3 Pipeline: Not reported#2 Pipeline: Not reported#1 Pipeline: Not reportedNumber of Fatalities: Not reportedNumber of Injuries: Not reportedEvacuations: Not reportedSubstance #3: Not reportedSubstance #2: Not reportedUnknown: 2Quantity Released: Resin PowderSubstance: Not reportedE Date: Not reportedSite Type: YesContained: Not reportedAmount: City of Orange Fire Prevention BureauAdmin Agency: 8/1/2012Incident Date: Hazmat OneAgency: 2012Year: 2000Date/Time: Not reportedOther: Lbs.Measure: Not reportedType: Not reportedWhat Happened: Not reportedContainment: Responsible PartyCleanup By: OtherSpill Site: Not reportedWaterway: NoWaterway Involved: Not reportedFacility Telephone: Not reportedReport Date: Not reportedReporting Officer Name/ID: Not reportedCompany Name: Not reportedCA DOT PUC/ICC Number: Not reportedVehicle Id Number: Not reportedVehicle State: Not reportedVehicle License Number: Not reportedVehicle Make/year: Not reportedOthers Number Of Fatalities: Not reportedOthers Number Of Injuries: Not reportedOthers Number Of Decontaminated: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reportedResp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reportedMore Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reportedProperty Management: Not reportedEstimated Temperature: Not reportedSurrounding Area: Not reportedTime Completed: Not reportedTime Notified: Not reportedAgency Incident Number: Not reportedAgency Id Number: Not reportedProperty Use: Not reportedDate Completed: YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC (Continued)1000291248 TC5029994.2s Page 15 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedE Date: Not reportedSite Type: YesContained: Not reportedAmount: City of Orange Fire Prevention BureauAdmin Agency: 03/09/2015Incident Date: ERTSAgency: 2015Year: 1020Date/Time: Not reportedOther: Lbs.Measure: CHEMICALType: Not reportedOther: Not reportedMeasure: Not reportedType: Not reportedWhat Happened: Not reportedContainment: ContractorCleanup By: Merchant/BusinessSpill Site: Not reportedWaterway: NoWaterway Involved: Not reportedFacility Telephone: Not reportedReport Date: Not reportedReporting Officer Name/ID: Not reportedCompany Name: Not reportedCA DOT PUC/ICC Number: Not reportedVehicle Id Number: Not reportedVehicle State: Not reportedVehicle License Number: Not reportedVehicle Make/year: Not reportedOthers Number Of Fatalities: Not reportedOthers Number Of Injuries: Not reportedOthers Number Of Decontaminated: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reportedResp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reportedMore Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reportedProperty Management: Not reportedEstimated Temperature: Not reportedSurrounding Area: Not reportedTime Completed: Not reportedTime Notified: Not reportedAgency Incident Number: Not reportedAgency Id Number: Not reportedProperty Use: Not reportedDate Completed: Not reportedOES Time: Not reportedOES Date: 03/09/2015OES notification: 15-1345OES Incident Number: was damaged in transit. The substance spilled from a 50 pound bag thatDescription: Not reportedComments: Not reportedFatals: Not reportedInjuries: Not reportedEvacs: YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC (Continued)1000291248 TC5029994.2s Page 16 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedType: Not reportedWhat Happened: Not reportedContainment: Responsible PartyCleanup By: OtherSpill Site: Not reportedWaterway: NoWaterway Involved: Not reportedFacility Telephone: Not reportedReport Date: Not reportedReporting Officer Name/ID: Not reportedCompany Name: Not reportedCA DOT PUC/ICC Number: Not reportedVehicle Id Number: Not reportedVehicle State: Not reportedVehicle License Number: Not reportedVehicle Make/year: Not reportedOthers Number Of Fatalities: Not reportedOthers Number Of Injuries: Not reportedOthers Number Of Decontaminated: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reportedResp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reportedMore Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reportedProperty Management: Not reportedEstimated Temperature: Not reportedSurrounding Area: Not reportedTime Completed: Not reportedTime Notified: Not reportedAgency Incident Number: Not reportedAgency Id Number: Not reportedProperty Use: Not reportedDate Completed: Not reportedOES Time: Not reportedOES Date: 03/02/2015OES notification: 15-1199OES Incident Number: bag causing the release. Cleanup is in progress. RP states that a forklift punctured a 50 poundDescription: Not reportedComments: NoFatals: NoInjuries: NoEvacs: No#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#3 Pipeline: No#2 Pipeline: No#1 Pipeline: Not reportedNumber of Fatalities: Not reportedNumber of Injuries: Not reportedEvacuations: Not reportedSubstance #3: Not reportedSubstance #2: Not reportedUnknown: 10Quantity Released: UN2811 Toxic Solid, Vanax DOTGSubstance: YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC (Continued)1000291248 TC5029994.2s Page 17 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedVehicle License Number: Not reportedVehicle Make/year: Not reportedOthers Number Of Fatalities: Not reportedOthers Number Of Injuries: Not reportedOthers Number Of Decontaminated: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reportedResp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reportedMore Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reportedProperty Management: Not reportedEstimated Temperature: Not reportedSurrounding Area: Not reportedTime Completed: Not reportedTime Notified: Not reportedAgency Incident Number: Not reportedAgency Id Number: Not reportedProperty Use: Not reportedDate Completed: Not reportedOES Time: Not reportedOES Date: 07/22/2016OES notification: 16-4440OES Incident Number: the spill Per the caller a seam failed on a package causingDescription: Not reportedComments: NoFatals: NoInjuries: NoEvacs: No#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#3 Pipeline: No#2 Pipeline: No#1 Pipeline: Not reportedNumber of Fatalities: Not reportedNumber of Injuries: Not reportedEvacuations: Not reportedSubstance #3: Not reportedSubstance #2: Not reportedUnknown: 1Quantity Released: diatomaceous earthSubstance: Not reportedE Date: Not reportedSite Type: YesContained: Not reportedAmount: City of Orange Fire Prevention BureauAdmin Agency: 03/02/2015Incident Date: ERTSAgency: 2015Year: 1007Date/Time: Not reportedOther: Cup(s)Measure: CHEMICALType: Not reportedOther: Not reportedMeasure: YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC (Continued)1000291248 TC5029994.2s Page 18 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOES Time: Not reportedOES Date: 11/06/2012OES notification: 12-6707OES Incident Number: the relea A contractor is enroute to conduct a cleanup of of 1/2 cup of the chemical to the trailer floor. of the listed substance. The result was a release trailer, the staff discovered a damaged container During the off-loading of freight from a tractorDescription: Not reportedComments: NoFatals: NoInjuries: NoEvacs: No#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#3 Pipeline: No#2 Pipeline: No#1 Pipeline: Not reportedNumber of Fatalities: Not reportedNumber of Injuries: Not reportedEvacuations: Not reportedSubstance #3: Not reportedSubstance #2: Not reportedUnknown: 0.5Quantity Released: UN3242, AzodicarbonamideSubstance: Not reportedE Date: NoneSite Type: YesContained: Not reportedAmount: City of Orange Fire Prevention BureauAdmin Agency: 07/22/2016Incident Date: ERTSAgency: 2016Year: 715Date/Time: Not reportedOther: Cup(s)Measure: CHEMICALType: Not reportedOther: Not reportedMeasure: Not reportedType: Not reportedWhat Happened: Not reportedContainment: ContractorCleanup By: OtherSpill Site: NoneWaterway: NoWaterway Involved: Not reportedFacility Telephone: Not reportedReport Date: Not reportedReporting Officer Name/ID: Not reportedCompany Name: Not reportedCA DOT PUC/ICC Number: Not reportedVehicle Id Number: Not reportedVehicle State: YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC (Continued)1000291248 TC5029994.2s Page 19 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#3 Pipeline: Not reported#2 Pipeline: Not reported#1 Pipeline: Not reportedNumber of Fatalities: Not reportedNumber of Injuries: Not reportedEvacuations: Not reportedSubstance #3: Not reportedSubstance #2: Not reportedUnknown: 10Quantity Released: Naxan PowderSubstance: Not reportedE Date: Not reportedSite Type: YesContained: Not reportedAmount: City of Orange Fire Prevention BureauAdmin Agency: 11/6/2012Incident Date: HazMat OneAgency: 2012Year: 400Date/Time: Not reportedOther: Lbs.Measure: Not reportedType: Not reportedWhat Happened: Not reportedContainment: ContractorCleanup By: OtherSpill Site: Not reportedWaterway: NoWaterway Involved: Not reportedFacility Telephone: Not reportedReport Date: Not reportedReporting Officer Name/ID: Not reportedCompany Name: Not reportedCA DOT PUC/ICC Number: Not reportedVehicle Id Number: Not reportedVehicle State: Not reportedVehicle License Number: Not reportedVehicle Make/year: Not reportedOthers Number Of Fatalities: Not reportedOthers Number Of Injuries: Not reportedOthers Number Of Decontaminated: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reportedResp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reportedMore Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reportedProperty Management: Not reportedEstimated Temperature: Not reportedSurrounding Area: Not reportedTime Completed: Not reportedTime Notified: Not reportedAgency Incident Number: Not reportedAgency Id Number: Not reportedProperty Use: Not reportedDate Completed: YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC (Continued)1000291248 TC5029994.2s Page 20 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: KansasDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Private BusinessOPERATOR TYPE: Joyce.loredo@yrcfreight.comOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: 225OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: 913-344-3367OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Joyce LoredoOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: 66211OPERATOR ZIP: KansasOPERATOR STATE: Overland ParkOPERATOR CITY: 10990 Roe Ave MS A605OPERATOR ADDRESS: YRC FreightOPERATOR NAME: Dominic.Desantis@YRCFreight.comFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: 225FACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: 714-978-6221FACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Terminal ManagerFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Dominic DesantisFACILITY CONTACT NAME: AcresPLACE SIZE UNIT: 9PLACE SIZE: 4/2/1992STATUS DATE: ActiveSTATUS CODE NAME: 4/2/1992PROCESSED DATE: 5/9/2008RECEIVED DATE: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I003120WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder No: 208337Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Id: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedNpdes Number: NPDES: terminal caused the spill. Per the caller improper loading at a previousDescription: Not reportedComments: Not reportedFatals: Not reportedInjuries: Not reportedEvacs: YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC (Continued)1000291248 TC5029994.2s Page 21 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT NAME: Not reportedPLACE SIZE UNIT: Not reportedPLACE SIZE: Not reportedSTATUS DATE: Not reportedSTATUS CODE NAME: Not reportedPROCESSED DATE: Not reportedRECEIVED DATE: 66211Discharge Zip: KansasDischarge State: Overland ParkDischarge City: 10990 Roe Ave MS A605Discharge Address: YRC FreightDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 04/02/1992Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I003120WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder No: 208337Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: 0Agency Id: ActiveFacility Status: CAS000001Npdes Number: Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: 4213-Trucking, Except LocalPRIMARY SIC: 04-MAY-15CERTIFICATION DATE: Manager of Environmental ServicesCERTIFIER TITLE: Ruben ByerleyCERTIFIER NAME: Santa Ana River Reach 2RECEIVING WATER NAME: NDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: 913-344-3409EMERGENCY PHONE NO: YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC (Continued)1000291248 TC5029994.2s Page 22 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid orFacility Type: Santa Ana River 30I003120Facility ID: WDS: Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: Not reportedPRIMARY SIC: Not reportedCERTIFICATION DATE: Not reportedCERTIFIER TITLE: Not reportedCERTIFIER NAME: Not reportedRECEIVING WATER NAME: Not reportedDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: Not reportedDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR TYPE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ZIP: Not reportedOPERATOR STATE: Not reportedOPERATOR CITY: Not reportedOPERATOR ADDRESS: Not reportedOPERATOR NAME: YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC (Continued) 1000291248 TC5029994.2s Page 23 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedWaste2: Not reportedWaste Type2: Not reportedPrimary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedSIC Code 2: 0SIC Code: PrivateAgency Type: 9133443409Agency Telephone: STEVE TRAVISAgency Contact: OVERLAND PARK 66207Agency City,St,Zip: 10990 ROE AVEAgency Address: YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC.Agency Name: STEVE SHINNERSFacility Contact: 9133443409Facility Telephone: 8Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC (Continued) 1000291248 DIESELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 02-19-92Active Date: 20000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-045828-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 1Owner Tank Id: 10-13-88Created Date: 02-19-92Action Date: 02-19-92Referral Date: 44-000906Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 45828Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 950 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster C 0.180 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 156 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92667 ENE 700 N ECHOFF N/A C9 SWEEPS USTYELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC.S106934613 TC5029994.2s Page 24 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 02-19-92Active Date: 560Capacity: ATank Status: 30-030-045828-000002SWRCB Tank Id: 2Owner Tank Id: 10-13-88Created Date: 02-19-92Action Date: 02-19-92Referral Date: 44-000906Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 45828Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 2Number Of Tanks: YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM INC. (Continued) S106934613 Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: WELLS, POSSIBLE OFFSITE CONTAMINATION (4/19/1990) TEMPORARY DISCONTINUE GROUNDWATER MONITORING, AGREED TO MAINTAINSite History: Toluene, Xylene, Diesel, GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: drinking water), Soil Contaminated Surface / Structure, Other Groundwater (uses other thanPotential Media Affected: Regional BoardFile Location: SLT8R274RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: Not reportedCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -117.874052524567Longitude: 33.7984073275459Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Lead Agency: SLT8R2744153Global Id: 11/10/2009Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 950 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster C 0.180 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 156 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA ENE 700 ECKHOFF STREET N N/A C10 SLICYELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC.S106487020 TC5029994.2s Page 25 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: DAN VITULLOOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 937-1696Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92668 675 F NORTH ECKHOFFContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: CAD982369183EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92868 675 N ECKHOFF STE FFacility address: DANS MACHINE TOOL REPAIRFacility name: 04/11/1988Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1002 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster C 0.190 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 156 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOORANGE, CA 92868 ENE FINDS675 N ECKHOFF STE F CAD982369183 C11 RCRA-SQGDANS MACHINE TOOL REPAIR 1000375157 TC5029994.2s Page 26 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110008276828DFR URL: 110008276828Registry ID: 1000375157Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110008276828Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: DANS MACHINE TOOL REPAIR (Continued) 1000375157 TOM MCEWENOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (415) 555-1212Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92668 675 N ECKOFF UNIT HContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: CAD981973803EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92868 675 N ECKOFF ST UNIT HFacility address: TOM MC EWEN RACINGFacility name: 05/07/1987Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1002 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster C 0.190 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 156 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOORANGE, CA 92868 ENE FINDS675 N ECKOFF ST UNIT H CAD981973803 C12 RCRA-SQGTOM MC EWEN RACING 1000123814 TC5029994.2s Page 27 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 110008273368Registry ID: 1000123814Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110008273368Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: TOM MC EWEN RACING (Continued) 1000123814 TC5029994.2s Page 28 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110008273368DFR URL: TOM MC EWEN RACING (Continued) 1000123814 NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: RON JONESOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: CAD981161243EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92868 675 N ECKHOFF UNIT FFacility address: HANDCRAFTED METALFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1002 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster C 0.190 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 156 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92868 ENE 675 N ECKHOFF UNIT F CAD981161243 C13 RCRA-SQGHANDCRAFTED METAL 1000185250 TC5029994.2s Page 29 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: HANDCRAFTED METALSite name: 10/30/1985Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: HANDCRAFTED METAL (Continued) 1000185250 NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: SERGE ZAIDMANOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 895-2800Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 2300 E ORANGEWOODContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 E ORANGEWOODMailing address: CAD982407918EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 2300 E ORANGEWOODFacility address: SANHER WIRE WHEEL INCFacility name: 03/31/1988Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1034 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster D 0.196 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 147 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOANAHEIM, CA 92806 West FINDS2300 E ORANGEWOOD CAD982407918 D14 RCRA-SQGSANHER WIRE WHEEL INC 1000240716 TC5029994.2s Page 30 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002805965DFR URL: 110002805965Registry ID: 1000240716Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002805965Registry ID: STATE MASTER Environmental Interest/Information System 110055773328Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: SANHER WIRE WHEEL INC (Continued) 1000240716 TC5029994.2s Page 31 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 07/31/2017Expiration Date: 582Reg Num: HWT: 1034 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster D 0.196 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 147 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 West 2300 E. ORANGEWOOD AVE. N/A D15 HWTKARCHER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.S107144628 NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 937-5098Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 2230 S DUPONT DROwner/operator address: DAVID CHUOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 937-5098Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 928066104 2230 SOUTH DUPONT DRContact address: DAVID CHUContact: ANAHEIM, CA 928066104 SOUTH DUPONT DRMailing address: CAR000018796EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 928066104 2230 SOUTH DUPONT DRFacility address: SERVICE MANUFACTURING AND ENERGYFacility name: 03/26/1997Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1171 ft. 0.222 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOANAHEIM, CA 92806 WSW FINDS2230 SOUTH DUPONT DR CAR000018796 16 RCRA-SQGSERVICE MANUFACTURING AND ENERGY 1001195313 TC5029994.2s Page 32 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002916747DFR URL: 110002916747Registry ID: 1001195313Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002916747Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: SERVICE MANUFACTURING AND ENERGY (Continued) 1001195313 cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 456-1322Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92868 N. POPLAR ST.Contact address: DAVID RAMOSContact: ORANGE, CA 92868 ECKHOFFMailing address: CAD982506719EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92868 759 ECKHOFF ST.Facility address: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCOFacility name: 02/10/2016Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 1268 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster E 0.240 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 157 ft. 1/8-1/4 NPDESORANGE, CA 92868 NE EMI759 ECKHOFF ST.CAD982506719 E17 RCRA-LQGNATIONAL OILWELL VARCO 1001085513 TC5029994.2s Page 33 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 223. Waste code: 221. Waste name: 221. Waste code: 214. Waste name: 214. Waste code: 181. Waste name: 181. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 12/30/2005Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: HOUSTON, TX 77036 PARKWOOD CIRCLEOwner/operator address: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO LPOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 12/30/2005Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO LPOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO (Continued) 1001085513 TC5029994.2s Page 34 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO, LPSite name: 08/10/2010Date form received by agency: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCOSite name: 06/06/2012Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: 513. Waste name: 513. Waste code: 343. Waste name: 343. Waste code: 223. Waste name: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO (Continued) 1001085513 TC5029994.2s Page 35 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO, LPSite name: 03/31/2008Date form received by agency: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: 513. Waste name: 513. Waste code: 343. Waste name: 343. Waste code: 223. Waste name: 223. Waste code: 221. Waste name: 221. Waste code: 214. Waste name: 214. Waste code: 181. Waste name: 181. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO (Continued) 1001085513 TC5029994.2s Page 36 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation REACTIVE WASTE. Waste name: D003. Waste code: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: VARCO SYSTEMS L.P.Site name: 02/24/2004Date form received by agency: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: VARCOSite name: 03/01/2006Date form received by agency: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO A NATL OILWELL VASite name: 06/14/2006Date form received by agency: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO (Continued) 1001085513 TC5029994.2s Page 37 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: VARCO BJ DRILLING SYSTEMS INCSite name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: VARCO BJ DRILLING SYSTEMSSite name: 03/04/1999Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: VARCO SYSTEMSSite name: 10/12/2000Date form received by agency: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: 343. Waste name: 343. Waste code: 223. Waste name: 223. Waste code: 214. Waste name: 214. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: VARCO SYSTEMSSite name: 02/27/2002Date form received by agency: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: F005. Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO (Continued) 1001085513 TC5029994.2s Page 38 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: 08/19/2015Date violation determined: Generators - Records/ReportingArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: 5350Amount (Lbs): MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWaste name: F003Waste code: 41562Amount (Lbs): CADMIUMWaste name: D006Waste code: 36262Amount (Lbs): WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Annual Waste Handled: Last Biennial Reporting Year: 2013 Biennial Reports: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: VARCO BJ DRILLING SYSTEMSSite name: 06/02/1994Date form received by agency: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: VARCO BJ DRILLING SYSTEMS INCSite name: 12/14/1995Date form received by agency: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO (Continued) 1001085513 TC5029994.2s Page 39 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/20/2009 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/17/2009Date achieved compliance: 01/20/2009Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: 04/12/2011Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: 08/19/2015Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 09/21/2015Date achieved compliance: 08/19/2015Date violation determined: Generators - Pre-transportArea of violation: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO (Continued)1001085513 TC5029994.2s Page 40 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/19/2015Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Generators - Records/ReportingArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/19/2015Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/26/2015Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/21/2015Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 11/09/2015Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/23/2016Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/24/2016Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/19/2016Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/20/2009 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 01/20/2009Date achieved compliance: 01/20/2009Date violation determined: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO (Continued) 1001085513 TC5029994.2s Page 41 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/26/2013Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 07/11/2013Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 07/18/2013Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/04/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/05/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/14/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/23/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/30/2014Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/19/2015Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 09/21/2015Date achieved compliance: Generators - Pre-transportArea of violation: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO (Continued) 1001085513 TC5029994.2s Page 42 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3599SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 22684Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1996Year: EMI: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 12/11/2003Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/29/2005Evaluation date: LocalEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/27/2006Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 03/17/2009Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 01/20/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 01/20/2009Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 01/20/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/24/2010Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/12/2011Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/20/2012Evaluation date: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO (Continued) 1001085513 TC5029994.2s Page 43 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0.0336Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.00371SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.582NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.157Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 5.61Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 6.4897Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3533SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 22684Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2004Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 6Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 6Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3533SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 22684Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2003Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 6Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 6Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3533SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 22684Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2002Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 9Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 10Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO (Continued)1001085513 TC5029994.2s Page 44 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: 714-978-1900EMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: CaliforniaDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Private BusinessOPERATOR TYPE: bballard@varco.comOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: 713-799-5100OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Robert BallardOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: 77051OPERATOR ZIP: TexasOPERATOR STATE: HoustonOPERATOR CITY: 2835 Holmes RdOPERATOR ADDRESS: Varco LPOPERATOR NAME: dlrice@varco.comFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: 7144561397FACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: ROBERT TownsendFACILITY CONTACT NAME: SqFtPLACE SIZE UNIT: 150000PLACE SIZE: 8/1/2006STATUS DATE: TerminatedSTATUS CODE NAME: 4/2/1992PROCESSED DATE: 5/9/2008RECEIVED DATE: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I002812WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder No: 208314Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Id: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedNpdes Number: NPDES: 0.03Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO (Continued)1001085513 TC5029994.2s Page 45 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: 3533-Oil and Gas Field Machinery and EquipmentPRIMARY SIC: Not reportedCERTIFICATION DATE: Not reportedCERTIFIER TITLE: Not reportedCERTIFIER NAME: Santa Ana RiverRECEIVING WATER NAME: Not reportedDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO (Continued) 1001085513 Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 981-7210Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92868 760 N ECKHOFF STOwner/operator address: MINH DOOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 634-3417Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92868 760 N ECKHOFF STContact address: DANNY QUACHContact: CAR000055863EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92868 760 N ECKHOFF STFacility address: PACIFIC FINISHING INCFacility name: 08/25/1999Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1292 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster E 0.245 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 157 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOORANGE, CA 92868 NE FINDS760 N ECKHOFF ST CAR000055863 E18 RCRA-SQGPACIFIC FINISHING INC 1001492858 TC5029994.2s Page 46 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: F005. Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: TRICHLORETHYLENE. Waste name: D040. Waste code: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE. Waste name: D039. Waste code: METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name: D035. Waste code: BENZENE. Waste name: D018. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: PACIFIC FINISHING INC (Continued) 1001492858 TC5029994.2s Page 47 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002929573DFR URL: 110002929573Registry ID: 1001492858Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource AIR EMISSIONS CLASSIFICATION UNKNOWN Environmental Interest/Information System 110002929573Registry ID: FINDS: PACIFIC FINISHING INC (Continued) 1001492858 from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: MIKE@TRICOREALTY.COMContact email: 714-751-4420Contact telephone: USContact country: COSTA MESA, CA 92626 3100 PULLMAN ST UNIT AContact address: MICHAEL R HARRISONContact: COSTA MESA, CA 92626 UNIT A 3100 PULLMAN STMailing address: CAD131925711EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92868 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVEFacility address: STEVENS METAL FINISHINGFacility name: 06/19/2006Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 1722 ft. Site 1 of 7 in cluster F 0.326 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 154 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92868 East ENVIROSTOR1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE CAD131925711 F19 RCRA-LQGSTEVENS METAL FINISHING 1000430212 TC5029994.2s Page 48 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: STEVENS METAL FINISHINGSite name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: STEVEN METAL FINISHINGSite name: 03/04/1999Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: STEVENS METAL FINISHINGSite name: 10/12/2000Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/17/2002Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: TRICO REALTY INC AGENT FOR STEVENS METALOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 06/01/1996Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: COSTA MESA, CA 92626 3100 PULLMAN ST UNIT AOwner/operator address: TRICO HST ASSOCIATESOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than STEVENS METAL FINISHING (Continued) 1000430212 TC5029994.2s Page 49 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/05/2006Completed Date: Interim Measures WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002672Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401053Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD131925711Alias Name: SOILPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: (free Nickel Zinc Cadmium and compounds Chromium III Copper and compounds CyanidePotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8694Longitude: 33.79636Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: Not reportedSenate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: 401053Site Code: 05/17/2002Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: 71002672Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/20/1994Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: STEVENS METAL FINISHINGSite name: 09/21/1995Date form received by agency: STEVENS METAL FINISHING (Continued)1000430212 TC5029994.2s Page 50 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: 05/26/2006Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/28/2002Completed Date: Consent AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Inspection report sent on 1/24/2005Comments: 01/24/2005Completed Date: OversightCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/22/2004Completed Date: Supplemental Site Investigation WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/29/2006Completed Date: Interim Measures Implementation ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/29/2005Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/27/2004Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/10/2002Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/05/2002Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/17/2002Completed Date: STEVENS METAL FINISHING (Continued) 1000430212 TC5029994.2s Page 51 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/30/2006Completed Date: No Further Action LetterCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/11/2002Completed Date: Phase I VerificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/19/2004Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/28/2002Completed Date: Consent AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Inspection report sent on 2/19/2004Comments: 02/19/2004Completed Date: OversightCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/24/2005Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/11/2002Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/30/2006Completed Date: Corrective Action Completion DeterminationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: STEVENS METAL FINISHING (Continued) 1000430212 TC5029994.2s Page 52 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/20/2010Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 03/28/1991Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 80001460Alias Name: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30360005Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 400215Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD067625129Alias Name: UEPotential Description: 30127-NO 30018-NO 30013-NO 30564-NO 30156-NO 30182-NO 30192-NO Under InvestigationConfirmed COC: 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Chlorobenzene Copper and compounds 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB Under Investigation Lead Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBsPotential COC: MANUFACTURING - ELECTRONIC, RESEARCH - OTHERPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8689Longitude: 33.79673Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Northern California Schools & Santa SusanaDivision Branch: Jose SalcedoSupervisor: Jose LuevanoProgram Manager: WMLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 1Acres: Corrective ActionSite Type Detailed: Corrective ActionSite Type: 400215Site Code: 06/12/2012Status Date: ActiveStatus: 80001460Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 1722 ft. Site 2 of 7 in cluster F 0.326 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 154 ft. 1/4-1/2 HWPORANGE, CA 92668 East Orange Co. Industrial Site1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE N/A F20 ENVIROSTORDATA CIRCUITSINC.S108756825 TC5029994.2s Page 53 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Closure: 09/18/1990Actual Date: New Operating Permit - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGEDEvent Description: Not reportedUnit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD067625129EPA Id: 09/15/1989Actual Date: New Operating Permit - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST RECEIVEDEvent Description: Not reportedUnit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD067625129EPA Id: 11/08/1988Actual Date: New Operating Permit - CALL-IN LETTER ISSUEDEvent Description: Not reportedUnit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD067625129EPA Id: Activities: Not reportedPublic Information Officer: Not reportedPublic Information Officer: 37Senate District: 68Assembly District: 400215Site Code: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedTeam: Not reportedFacility Size: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: -117.8689Longitude: 33.79673Latitude: CLOSEDCleanup Status: CAD067625129EPA Id: HWP: HEAVY METAL WASTE NON-PLATINGReleased Chemical: Closure certification issuedClosure Type: CLOSED 2/14/1997Current Status: RO0000531Record ID: 96IC011Case ID: COPPER ETCHANTSReleased Chemical: Closed pre 1994, file review required to determine closure typeClosure Type: CLOSED 10/17/1991Current Status: RO0000318Record ID: 91IC032Case ID: Orange Co. Industrial Site: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: DATA CIRCUITSINC. (Continued)S108756825 TC5029994.2s Page 54 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 400215Alias: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD067625129EPA Id: 30360005Alias: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD067625129EPA Id: Alias: 05/13/1992Actual Date: Closure Final - ISSUE CLOSURE VERIFICATIONEvent Description: BATCHTANK1, CLARIFIER1, CONTAIN1, ETCHTANK1, TRTTANK1, TRTTANK2Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD067625129EPA Id: 01/30/1992Actual Date: Closure Final - RECEIVE CLOSURE CERTIFICATIONEvent Description: BATCHTANK1, CLARIFIER1, CONTAIN1, ETCHTANK1, TRTTANK1, TRTTANK2Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD067625129EPA Id: DATA CIRCUITSINC. (Continued)S108756825 NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: METALS * ORGANIC LIQUIDS WITH METALS * ALKALINE SOLUTION 2<PH<12.5, WITHPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8694Longitude: 33.79636Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: Not reportedSenate: Not reportedAssembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: * MmonroySupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: 400215Site Code: 05/10/1995Status Date: Refer: RCRAStatus: 30360005Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 1722 ft. Site 3 of 7 in cluster F 0.326 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 154 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92667 East 1607 WEST ORANGEGROVE, SUITE A N/A F21 ENVIROSTORDATA CIRCUITS INC.S101481465 TC5029994.2s Page 55 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: NFA FOR SITE MITIGATION OPERATIONS, THIS IS A RCRA FACILITY.Comments: 02/09/1995Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED ID FROM ASP FILESComments: 09/03/1982Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30360005Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 400215Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD067625129Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: DATA CIRCUITS INC. (Continued)S101481465 CAD067625129EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92868 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE STE AFacility address: DATA CIRCUITS INCFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-TSDF: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Other Electronic Component Manufacturing Bare Printed Circuit Board Manufacturing 334412 334419NAICS Code(s): corrective action priority CA075ME - CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a mediumAction: 19910328Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 9EPA Region: CAD067625129EPA ID: CORRACTS: 1722 ft. Site 4 of 7 in cluster F 0.326 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 154 ft. 1/4-1/2 RCRA-SQGORANGE, CA 92868 East RCRA-TSDF1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE STE A CAD067625129 F22 CORRACTSDATA CIRCUITS INC 1000141851 TC5029994.2s Page 56 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 10/07/1980Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: DATA CIRCUITSSite name: 04/03/1991Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 997-2471Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92668 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE STE AOwner/operator address: DATA CIRCUITS INCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 997-2471Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92668 1607 W ORANGE GROVE AVE STE AOwner/operator address: DATA CIRCUITS INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: waste Handler is engaged in the treatment, storage or disposal of hazardousDescription: TSDFClassification: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.Land type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: DATA CIRCUITS INC (Continued)1000141851 TC5029994.2s Page 57 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/14/1988Date achieved compliance: 08/01/1988Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: F - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 08/25/1988 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/14/1988Date achieved compliance: 08/01/1988Date violation determined: TSD - Closure/Post-ClosureArea of violation: F - 264.110-120.GRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 09/16/1988 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/14/1988Date achieved compliance: 08/01/1988Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: F - 264.140-150.HRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: CA03192Event: Not reportedEvent date: CA074MEEvent: 03/28/1991Event date: action priority. CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a medium correctiveEvent: 03/28/1991Event date: CA049PAEvent: 03/28/1991Event date: CA029STEvent: 03/28/1991Event date: Corrective Action Summary: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: DATA CIRCUITS INCSite name: DATA CIRCUITS INC (Continued)1000141851 TC5029994.2s Page 58 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/01/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 10/14/1988Date achieved compliance: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/01/1988Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 07/05/1989 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/14/1988Date achieved compliance: 08/01/1988Date violation determined: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: F - 268 ALLRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 08/25/1988 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/14/1988Date achieved compliance: 08/01/1988Date violation determined: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: F - 270Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 07/05/1989 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/14/1988Date achieved compliance: 08/01/1988Date violation determined: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: F - 268.7Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: DATA CIRCUITS INC (Continued)1000141851 TC5029994.2s Page 59 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation StateEvaluation lead agency: 10/14/1988Date achieved compliance: TSD - Closure/Post-ClosureArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/01/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 10/14/1988Date achieved compliance: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/01/1988Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 10/14/1988Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: DATA CIRCUITS INC (Continued)1000141851 / /CC Concurrence Date: 06059Site Fips Code: 09/19/00Non NPL Status Date: Deferred to RCRANon NPL Status: Not reportedRResp Fed Agency Code: Not reportedRBRAC Code: Not reportedDMNSN Unit Code: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not reportedSite Settings Code: Not reportedClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedRST Code: Not reportedParent ID: Not reportedNFRAP Flag: Not reportedSite Init By Prog: Not reportedUSGS Quadrangle: ERCRA ID: NSite Orphan Flag: 0.00000DMNSN Number: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: 18070203USGC Hydro Unit: 0360SMSA Number: Not reportedIFMS ID: 39Congressional District: DATA CIRCUITSShort Name: ORANGEFacility County: CAD067625129EPA ID: 0900349Site ID: :Following information was gathered from the prior CERCLIS update completed in 10/2013: Deferred to RCRANon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL: NFederal Facility: CAD067625129EPA ID: 900349Site ID: SEMS: 1722 ft. Site 5 of 7 in cluster F 0.326 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 154 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92868 East 1607 E ORANGE GROVE AVE CAD067625129 F23 SEMSDATA CIRCUITS 1015730636 TC5029994.2s Page 60 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAction Anomaly: Not reportedUrgency Indicator: Not reportedPlanning Status: EPA Fund-FinancedPrimary Responsibility: SITEWIDEOperable Unit: Deferred to RCRA (Subtitle C)Priority Level: 03/28/91Date Completed: / /Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: 001Action Code: Not reportedAction Anomaly: Not reportedUrgency Indicator: Not reportedPlanning Status: EPA Fund-FinancedPrimary Responsibility: SITEWIDEOperable Unit: Not reportedPriority Level: 08/24/90Date Completed: / /Date Started: DISCOVERYAction: 001Action Code: CERCLIS Assessment History: Not reportedSite Description: Not reportedAlias Comments: Not reportedContact Email: Site Assessment Manager (SAM)Contact Title: Not reportedContact Tel: Carl BricknerContact Name: 13004003.00000Contact ID: Not reportedContact Email: Site Assessment Manager (SAM)Contact Title: (415) 972-4250Contact Tel: Sharon MurrayContact Name: 13003858.00000Contact ID: Not reportedContact Email: Site Assessment Manager (SAM)Contact Title: (415) 972-3978Contact Tel: Leslie RamirezContact Name: 13003854.00000Contact ID: CERCLIS Site Contact Name(s): Not reportedSite FUDS Flag: Not reportedAlias EPA ID: Not reportedCC Concurrence FY: DATA CIRCUITS (Continued)1015730636 TC5029994.2s Page 61 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 09/14/1995Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901865Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 05/09/1995Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901865Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 05/09/1995Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901865Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 05/09/1995Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901865Global Id: 09/14/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901865Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: r8 UNKNOWNCity: Not reportedAddress: ORANGE, CITY OFOrganization Name: UNKContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901865Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083002687TRB Case Number: ORANGE, CITY OFLocal Agency: UNKCase Worker: ORANGE, CITY OFLead Agency: 09/14/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.8686193Longitude: 33.7968254Latitude: T0605901865Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1777 ft. Site 6 of 7 in cluster F 0.337 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 154 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92668 East 1602 W ORANGE GROVE AVE N/A F24 LUSTARMORED TRANSPORT S103951207 TC5029994.2s Page 62 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak ReportedAction: 06/07/1995Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901865Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: ARMORED TRANSPORT (Continued) S103951207 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8686193Longitude: 33.7968254Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 9/13/1995Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 9/14/1995Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 5/9/1995Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 9/13/1995Enter Date: 5/9/1995How Stopped Date: T0605901865Global ID: Other SourceLeak Source: OverfillLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: ORANGEWOODCross Street: approved site Excavate and Dispose - remove contaminated soil and dispose inAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083002687TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1777 ft. Site 7 of 7 in cluster F 0.337 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 154 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92668 East HIST CORTESE1602 ORANGE GROVE AVE N/A F25 LUSTARMORED TRANSPORT S100930009 TC5029994.2s Page 63 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083002687TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: DIESEL ALSOSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: Orange, Orange CountyLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: UNKStaff Initials: WDMStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: ARMORED TRANSPORT (Continued) S100930009 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902165Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum HydrocarbonPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083003184TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 02/23/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.886025Longitude: 33.797136Latitude: T0605902165Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: HIST CORTESE 1871 ft.EMI 0.354 mi.CA FID UST Relative: Lower Actual: 146 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST USTANAHEIM, CA 91806 WNW SWEEPS UST2125 E ORANGEWOOD AV N/A 26 LUSTPINATA MEXICAN FOODS,DIV ALEX S101619875 TC5029994.2s Page 64 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: Leak ReportedAction: 05/05/1998Date: OtherAction Type: T0605902165Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 02/23/2000Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605902165Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 02/23/2000Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605902165Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 04/18/1998Date: OtherAction Type: T0605902165Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 04/28/1998Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605902165Global Id: 09/09/1999Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605902165Global Id: 07/17/1998Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605902165Global Id: 04/18/1998Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605902165Global Id: 02/23/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605902165Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902165Global Id: PINATA MEXICAN FOODS,DIV ALEX (Continued) S101619875 TC5029994.2s Page 65 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 46Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: CABStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8866009Longitude: 33.7962663Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 6/29/1998Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: 9/9/1999Date Remedial Action Underway: 7/17/1998Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 2/23/2000Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 4/18/1998Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 4/28/1998Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 6/29/1998Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605902165Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: STATE COLLEGECross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: HydrocarbonsSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083003184TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: PINATA MEXICAN FOODS,DIV ALEX (Continued)S101619875 TC5029994.2s Page 66 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92806Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 305 W ROMNEYAMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7146348441Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30006755Facility ID: CA FID UST: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E4A4.pdfURL: 0002E4A4File Number: HIST UST: 1Number Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10-15-93Active Date: 15000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-000046-000004SWRCB Tank Id: UNKNOWNOwner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 05-16-94Action Date: 10-15-93Referral Date: 44-035510Board Of Equalization: 1Number: PINATA MEXICAN FOODS,DIV ALEX (Continued)S101619875 TC5029994.2s Page 67 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083003184TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2051SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 39711Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: 1Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 2Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2051SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 39711Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1987Year: EMI: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: PINATA MEXICAN FOODS,DIV ALEX (Continued) S101619875 Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detailed: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 401646Site Code: 09/16/2014Status Date: CertifiedStatus: 60001900Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 1923 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster G 0.364 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 West VCP2020,2034,2040 & 2100 EAST ORANGEWOOD AVENUE N/A G27 ENVIROSTORGATEWAY APARTMENTS II S113804697 TC5029994.2s Page 68 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Environmental Assessment. Based on DTSC’s comments RP submitted Workplan for SubsurfaceComments: 09/09/2013Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/16/2014Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Post mitigation site visitComments: 05/05/2014Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: CLRRA Agreement executed.Comments: 07/01/2013Completed Date: California Land Reuse and Revitalization AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60001900Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401646Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 083-271-21Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 083-271-15Alias Name: UEPotential Description: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHsConfirmed COC: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHsPotential COC: NONEPast Use: 083-271-15, 083-271-21APN: -117.8869Longitude: 33.79541Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: CLRRA Liability Immunity (AB 389)Special Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Emad YemutSupervisor: Hossein NassiriProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 6.2Acres: GATEWAY APARTMENTS II (Continued)S113804697 TC5029994.2s Page 69 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Emad YemutSupervisor: Hossein NassiriProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 6.2Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detail: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 60001900Facility ID: VCP: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: and closeout once final payment is received. Closeout Site Code and Notification to Billing to send final invoiceComments: 10/09/2014Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/11/2014Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/06/2014Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/11/2013Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/08/2013Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/17/2013Completed Date: GATEWAY APARTMENTS II (Continued) S113804697 TC5029994.2s Page 70 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/17/2013Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Environmental Assessment. Based on DTSC’s comments RP submitted Workplan for SubsurfaceComments: 09/09/2013Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/16/2014Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Post mitigation site visitComments: 05/05/2014Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: CLRRA Agreement executed.Comments: 07/01/2013Completed Date: California Land Reuse and Revitalization AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60001900Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401646Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 083-271-21Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 083-271-15Alias Name: UEPotential Description: 30019Confirmed COC: 30019Potential COC: NONEPast Use: 083-271-15, 083-271-21APN: 33.79541 / -117.8869Lat/Long: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 09/16/2014Status Date: CertifiedStatus: CLRRA Liability Immunity (AB 389)Special Programs Code: 34Senate: 69Assembly: 401646Site Code: GATEWAY APARTMENTS II (Continued)S113804697 TC5029994.2s Page 71 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: and closeout once final payment is received. Closeout Site Code and Notification to Billing to send final invoiceComments: 10/09/2014Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/11/2014Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/06/2014Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/11/2013Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/08/2013Completed Date: GATEWAY APARTMENTS II (Continued) S113804697 Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 90UT090Local Case Num: 083001474TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1923 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster G 0.364 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 West HIST CORTESE2100 ORANGEWOOD N/A G28 LUSTEVEREST ELECTRONIC 1001615095 TC5029994.2s Page 72 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083001474TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: WJStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8868549Longitude: 33.7960243Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 8/9/1990Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 4/5/1990Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605901120Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: EVEREST ELECTRONIC (Continued) 1001615095 TC5029994.2s Page 73 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak DiscoveryAction: 04/05/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901120Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 04/05/1990Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901120Global Id: 08/09/1990Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901120Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: phannon@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: PATRICIA HANNONContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901120Global Id: 7144336011Phone Number: amartinez@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: ANTHONY MARTINEZContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901120Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 90UT090LOC Case Number: 083001474TRB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: AMCase Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 08/09/1990Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.916936Longitude: 33.7960783Latitude: T0605901120Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1923 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster G 0.364 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 West 2100 ORANGEWOOD N/A G29 LUSTEVEREST ELECTRONIC S104573813 TC5029994.2s Page 74 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak ReportedAction: 04/05/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901120Global Id: EVEREST ELECTRONIC (Continued) S104573813 1# Of Places: Not reportedNAICS Desc 3: Not reportedNAICS Code 3: Not reportedNAICS Desc 2: Not reportedNAICS Code 2: Not reportedNAICS Desc 1: Not reportedNAICS Code 1: Not reportedSIC Desc 3: Not reportedSIC Code 3: Not reportedSIC Desc 2: Not reportedSIC Code 2: Sanitary Services, NECSIC Desc 1: 4959SIC Code 1: Not reportedPlace Longitude: Not reportedPlace Latitude: 1# Of Agencies: Privately-Owned BusinessAgency Type: IndustrialFacility Type: Manufacturing NECPlace Subtype: ManufacturingPlace Type: ISCI Inc c/o Great Lakes CheAgency Name: 270748Facility Id: 8Region: ENF: Not reportedWaste Management Uit Name: Not reportedSolid Waste Id No: 8 302777N01WID Id: 8Region 2: Not reportedEffective Date: Not reportedWaste Discharge System No: Not reportedOrder No: CORTESEFlag: Not reportedSwat R: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedOwner: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: Not reportedCleanup Status: Not reportedSite/Facility Type: Not reportedEnvirostor Id: CORTESERegion: CORTESE: 2381 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster H 0.451 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 160 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST CORTESEORANGE, CA NNE ENF2033 COLLINS N/A H30 CorteseVOC INVESTIGATION S105025366 TC5029994.2s Page 75 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Total Assessment Amount: 1# Of Programs1: Not reportedLatest Milestone Completion Date: UNREGSProgram: VOC INVESTIGATION AND CLEANUPDescription: Enforcement - 8 302777N01Title: ActiveStatus: Not reportedEPL Issuance Date: Not reportedACL Issuance Date: Not reportedTermination Date: Not reportedAchieve Date: Not reportedAdoption/Issuance Date: 06/04/1993Effective Date: Clean-up and Abatement OrderEnforcement Action Type: 93-039Order / Resolution Number: 8Region: 223501Enforcement Id(EID): PassiveDirection/Voice: Not reportedFee Code: IIndividual/General: NStatus Enrollee: Not reportedWDR Review - Planned: Not reportedWDR Review - Pending: Not reportedWDR Review - No Action Required: Not reportedWDR Review - Rescind: Not reportedWDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not reportedWDR Review - Amend: Not reportedTermination Date: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: Not reportedEffective Date: 02/21/2013Status Date: Never ActiveStatus: Not reportedApplication Fee Amt Received: Not reported301H: Not reportedDredge Fill Fee: Not reportedReclamation: Not reportedNpdes Type: Not reportedMajor-Minor: Not reportedNpdes# CA#: Not reportedOrder #: 8Region: UnregulatedReg Measure Type: 159125Reg Measure Id: 8 302777N01WDID: 1# Of Programs: UNREGSProgram Category2: UNREGSProgram Category1: UNREGSProgram: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 4: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 3: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 2: Not reportedFacility Waste Type: Not reportedPretreatment: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedThreat To Water Quality: Not reportedDesign Flow: Reg MeasSource Of Facility: VOC INVESTIGATION (Continued)S105025366 TC5029994.2s Page 76 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8 302777N01Reg Id: WBC&DReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 0Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0Project $ Completed: 0Liability $ Paid: 0Project $ Amount: 0Liability $ Amount: 0Initial Assessed Amount: VOC INVESTIGATION (Continued)S105025366 11/10/88Date Completed: / /Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 11/10/88Date Completed: / /Date Started: ARCHIVE SITEAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 12/01/87Date Completed: / /Date Started: DISCOVERYAction: CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: 13004003.00000Person ID: 13298110.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003858.00000Person ID: 13292252.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003854.00000Person ID: 13286657.00000Contact Sequence ID: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: 0903195Site ID: :Following information was gathered from the prior CERCLIS update completed in 10/2013: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL: NFederal Facility: CAD086095908EPA ID: 903195Site ID: SEMS-ARCHIVE: 2441 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster H 0.462 mi.HIST CORTESE Relative: Higher Actual: 160 ft. 1/4-1/2 HAZNETORANGE, CA 92668 NNE RCRA-SQG2023 W COLLINS AVE CAD086095908 H31 SEMS-ARCHIVEINLAND SPECIALTIES CHEMICAL CORP 1000151895 TC5029994.2s Page 77 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 997-5880Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: CITY NOT REPORTED, CA 99999 2023 WEST COLLINS AVEOwner/operator address: INLAND SPECIALTY CHEMICAL CORPORATIONOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (317) 497-6100Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: WEST LAFAYETTE, IN 47906 P O BOX 2200Owner/operator address: ISCI INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (317) 497-6100Contact telephone: USContact country: WEST LAFAYETTE, IN 479060200 P O BOX 2200Contact address: TIMOTHY KELLEYContact: CAD086095908EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92867 2023 W COLLINS AVEFacility address: INLAND SPECIALTY CHEMICAL CORPFacility name: 02/15/1995Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationPriority Level: INLAND SPECIALTIES CHEMICAL CORP (Continued) 1000151895 TC5029994.2s Page 78 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Treatment, IncinerationDisposal Method: Not reportedWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: AZD982441263TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: WEST LAFAYETTE, IN 479962200Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 2200Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7654976100Telephone: INLAND SPECIALTY CHEMICAL CORPContact: CAD086095908GEPAID: 1998Year: 1000151895envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 2.1250Tons: Treatment, IncinerationDisposal Method: etc) Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene,Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: AZD982441263TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: WEST LAFAYETTE, IN 479962200Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 2200Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7654976100Telephone: INLAND SPECIALTY CHEMICAL CORPContact: CAD086095908GEPAID: 1999Year: 1000151895envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 3.5Tons: Not reportedDisposal Method: etc) Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene,Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: AZD982441263TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: WEST LAFAYETTE, IN 479962200Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 2200Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7654976100Telephone: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: CAD086095908GEPAID: 2000Year: 1000151895envid: HAZNET: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: INLAND SPECIALTIES CHEMICAL CORP (Continued)1000151895 TC5029994.2s Page 79 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 30280305Reg Id: CALSIReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 2.0000Tons: Treatment, IncinerationDisposal Method: Other organic solidsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: AZD982441263TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: WEST LAFAYETTE, IN 479962200Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 2200Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7654976100Telephone: INLAND SPECIALTY CHEMICAL CORPContact: CAD086095908GEPAID: 1997Year: 1000151895envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 2.0000Tons: Treatment, IncinerationDisposal Method: etc) Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene,Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: AZD982441263TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: WEST LAFAYETTE, IN 479962200Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 2200Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7654976100Telephone: INLAND SPECIALTY CHEMICAL CORPContact: CAD086095908GEPAID: 1998Year: 1000151895envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: .7500Tons: INLAND SPECIALTIES CHEMICAL CORP (Continued) 1000151895 TC5029994.2s Page 80 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation additional characterization is midway. (status 5). NFA for DTSC. SA RWQCB’s SLIC list indicates that the Board is the lead andComments: 05/02/1995Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: additional characterization is underway (Status 5). NFA for DTSC. SA RWQCB’S SLIC list indicates that the Board is the lead andComments: 06/01/1995Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED FROM PREVIOUS EMPLOYEES FILES.Comments: 07/01/1982Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30280305Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: CALIFORNIA CENTRIFUGAL PUMPSAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: Sludge - Paint * UNSPECIFIED SOLVENT MIXTURES ACID SOLUTION 2>PH WITH METALS * ALKALINE SOLUTION WITHOUT METALS * * HALOGENATED SOLVENTS * OXYGENATED SOLVENTS * CONTAMINATED SOIL *Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8743Longitude: 33.80315Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: * CERC2Special Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: * MmonroySupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 06/01/1995Status Date: Refer: RWQCBStatus: 30280305Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 2441 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster H 0.462 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 160 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92668 NNE SLIC2023 WEST COLLINS AVENUE N/A H32 ENVIROSTORINLAND SPECIALTIES CHEMICAL CORPORATION S101481425 TC5029994.2s Page 81 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation abandoned on 10/13/05. BORINGS)TO BEGIN BY 4/92. Closure granted 5/7/05. On-Site wells PHASE III WORK (1 ONSITE WELL, 4 OFFSITE WELLS, AND 11 SOILSite History: Trichloroethylene (TCE) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA), Tetrachloroethylene (PCE),Potential Contaminants of Concern: Not reportedPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: SLT8R143RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: Not reportedCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -117.87325Longitude: 33.802429Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Lead Agency: SLT8R1434141Global Id: 04/07/2005Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: SITE SCREENING DONE CERCLA GRANT PA REQ’D.Comments: 05/04/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: SITE SCREENING DONE SI LOW NEEDED TO VERIFY THAT SITE IS CONTAMINATEDComments: 04/15/1988Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: ACTIVITY UNDER THE DIRECTION OF FIRE DEPT NO RECORDS REGARDING ANY CLEAN UP CENTIFUGAL PUMPS OWN THE PROPERTY A NO OF UNDERGROUND WAS REMOVED PRELIM ASSESS DONE INLAND SPECIALTIES CO NO LONGER IN BUSINESSComments: 05/04/1988Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: SITE SCREENING DONE E&E REVIEW OF DHS PA RECOMMENDS NFA FOR EPAComments: 09/19/1988Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: INLAND SPECIALTIES CHEMICAL CORPORATION (Continued) S101481425 TC5029994.2s Page 82 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: INLAND SPECIALTIES CHEMICAL CORPORATION (Continued) S101481425 Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002448Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD051980365Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8672Longitude: 33.79566Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: 71002448Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 2483 ft. 0.470 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 158 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92668 East EMI512 N. MAIN STREET N/A 33 ENVIROSTORSTATEK CORP.S100945767 TC5029994.2s Page 83 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3679SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 35131Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1987Year: EMI: STATEK CORP. (Continued)S100945767 SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: PATRICIA HANNONContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900895Global Id: 7144336011Phone Number: amartinez@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: ANTHONY MARTINEZContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900895Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 89UT017LOC Case Number: 083001135TRB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: AMCase Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 04/04/1989Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.8784699Longitude: 33.7958244Latitude: T0605900895Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 2551 ft. 0.483 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 144 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 West HIST CORTESE2025 ORANGEWOOD N/A 34 LUSTLAMCOR INC S104160991 TC5029994.2s Page 84 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 4/4/1989Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 12/12/1988Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605900895Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 89UT017Local Case Num: 083001135TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: Leak ReportedAction: 12/12/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900895Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 12/12/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900895Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 12/12/1988Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900895Global Id: 04/04/1989Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900895Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: phannon@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: LAMCOR INC (Continued)S104160991 TC5029994.2s Page 85 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083001135TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: WJStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8886039Longitude: 33.7963363Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: LAMCOR INC (Continued)S104160991 Not reportedSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Javier HinojosaSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 9Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: 404171Site Code: 11/03/2000Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: 30820003Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 3349 ft. 0.634 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 158 ft. 1/2-1 ORANGE, CA 92868 SE SCH8670 RUNNING SPRINGS DRIVE N/A 35 ENVIROSTORRUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL S118756662 TC5029994.2s Page 86 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Javier HinojosaSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 9Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: 30820003Facility ID: SCH: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/03/2000Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: CRU Memo completedComments: 01/30/2001Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30820003Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404171Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ORANGE USD-RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARYAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED No Contaminants foundPotential COC: * EDUCATIONAL SERVICESPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.7253Longitude: 33.85882Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (Continued)S118756662 TC5029994.2s Page 87 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/03/2000Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: CRU Memo completedComments: 01/30/2001Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30820003Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404171Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ORANGE USD-RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARYAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED, No Contaminants foundPotential COC: * EDUCATIONAL SERVICESPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.7253Longitude: 33.85882Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 11/03/2000Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 37Senate: 68Assembly: 404171Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (Continued) S118756662 TC5029994.2s Page 88 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/30/1975Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: INDEPENDENT FORGE COMPANYOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/30/1979Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: INDEPENDENT FORGE COMPANYOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 997-7337Contact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: ROSEMARY RUIZContact: CAD981577976EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92668 692 N. BATAVIA STREETFacility address: INDEPENDENT FORGE CO.Facility name: 03/01/2006Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: WDS 3860 ft.NPDES 0.731 mi.ECHO Relative: Higher Actual: 172 ft. 1/2-1 FINDSORANGE, CA 92868 ENE ENVIROSTOR692 N BATAVIA ST CAD981577976 36 RCRA-SQGINDEPENDENT FORGE CO 1000209523 TC5029994.2s Page 89 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 02/02/2005Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: 02/02/2005Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: INDEPENDENT FORGE COSite name: 11/19/1986Date form received by agency: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: INDEPENDENT FORGE COSite name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: INDEPENDENT FORGE COSite name: 02/27/2002Date form received by agency: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC, AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS, EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: INDEPENDENT FORGE CO.Site name: 03/01/2006Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: INDEPENDENT FORGE CO (Continued) 1000209523 TC5029994.2s Page 90 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002881Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110008270058Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD981577976Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8627Longitude: 33.79884Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: 71002881Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/30/2003Evaluation date: INDEPENDENT FORGE CO (Continued)1000209523 TC5029994.2s Page 91 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPLACE SIZE UNIT: Not reportedPLACE SIZE: Not reportedSTATUS DATE: Not reportedSTATUS CODE NAME: Not reportedPROCESSED DATE: Not reportedRECEIVED DATE: 92868Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: 692 N Batavia StDischarge Address: Independent Forge CoDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 04/06/1992Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I004199WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder No: 208457Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: 0Agency Id: ActiveFacility Status: CAS000001Npdes Number: NPDES: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110008270058DFR URL: 110008270058Registry ID: 1000209523Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER HAZARDOUS WASTE BIENNIAL REPORTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110008270058Registry ID: FINDS: INDEPENDENT FORGE CO (Continued) 1000209523 TC5029994.2s Page 92 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOrder No: 208457Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Id: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedNpdes Number: Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: Not reportedPRIMARY SIC: Not reportedCERTIFICATION DATE: Not reportedCERTIFIER TITLE: Not reportedCERTIFIER NAME: Not reportedRECEIVING WATER NAME: Not reportedDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: Not reportedDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR TYPE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ZIP: Not reportedOPERATOR STATE: Not reportedOPERATOR CITY: Not reportedOPERATOR ADDRESS: Not reportedOPERATOR NAME: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT NAME: INDEPENDENT FORGE CO (Continued)1000209523 TC5029994.2s Page 93 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: 714-997-7337EMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: CaliforniaDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Private BusinessOPERATOR TYPE: dflores@independentforge.comOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: 714-997-7337OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: CFOOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Andrew FloresOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: 92868OPERATOR ZIP: CaliforniaOPERATOR STATE: OrangeOPERATOR CITY: 692 N Batavia StOPERATOR ADDRESS: Independent Forge CoOPERATOR NAME: dflores@independentforge.comFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: 714-997-7337FACILITY CONTACT PHONE: CFOFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Andrew FloresFACILITY CONTACT NAME: SqFtPLACE SIZE UNIT: 27700PLACE SIZE: 4/6/1992STATUS DATE: ActiveSTATUS CODE NAME: 4/6/1992PROCESSED DATE: 5/9/2008RECEIVED DATE: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I004199WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: INDEPENDENT FORGE CO (Continued)1000209523 TC5029994.2s Page 94 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedWaste2: Not reportedWaste Type2: Not reportedPrimary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedSIC Code 2: 0SIC Code: PrivateAgency Type: 7149977337Agency Telephone: ROSE MARY RUIZAgency Contact: ORANGE 92668Agency City,St,Zip: 692 N. BATAVIAAgency Address: INDEPENDENT FORGE COMPANYAgency Name: ROSE MARY RUIZFacility Contact: 7149977337Facility Telephone: 8Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid orFacility Type: Santa Ana River 30I004199Facility ID: WDS: Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: 3463-Nonferrous ForgingsPRIMARY SIC: 01-MAY-15CERTIFICATION DATE: CFOCERTIFIER TITLE: Andrew FloresCERTIFIER NAME: Santa Ana RiverRECEIVING WATER NAME: NDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: INDEPENDENT FORGE CO (Continued) 1000209523 TC5029994.2s Page 95 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as INDEPENDENT FORGE CO (Continued) 1000209523 NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (310) 537-0959Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: RANCHO DOMINGUEZ, CA 90220 18710 S WILMINGTON AVE STE 200Owner/operator address: CARSON ESTATE COOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 939-9640Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1800 TALBOT WYContact address: RICHARD PRICEContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 TALBOT WYMailing address: CAD983657685EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1800 TALBOT WYFacility address: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INCFacility name: 01/26/1993Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: WDS HAZNET 3880 ft.EMI 0.735 mi.ECHO Relative: Higher Actual: 150 ft. 1/2-1 FINDSANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW ENVIROSTOR1800 TALBOT WAY CAD983657685 37 RCRA-SQGCALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INC 1000819768 TC5029994.2s Page 96 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/18/2001Completed Date: Phase 1 Non-SubmittalCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71003180Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110002418081Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD983657685Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8901Longitude: 33.80222Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Robert SengaSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 10Acres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 05/12/2015Status Date: Refer: Local AgencyStatus: 71003180Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INC (Continued)1000819768 TC5029994.2s Page 97 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 94955Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1993Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 81260Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: EMI: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002418081DFR URL: 110002418081Registry ID: 1000819768Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) AIR EMISSIONS CLASSIFICATION UNKNOWN Environmental Interest/Information System 110002418081Registry ID: FINDS: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INC (Continued) 1000819768 TC5029994.2s Page 98 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 94955Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1997Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 94955Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1996Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 94955Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1995Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INC (Continued)1000819768 TC5029994.2s Page 99 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 94955Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2001Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 94955Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2000Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 94955Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1999Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 94955Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1998Year: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INC (Continued)1000819768 TC5029994.2s Page 100 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CHINO, CA 917100000Mailing City,St,Zip: 5051 EDISON AVENUEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149399640Telephone: EMERIO MEDINAContact: CAD983657685GEPAID: 2008Year: 1000819768envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 18.5565Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Alkaline solution (pH >= 12.5) with metalsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD097030993TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: CHINO, CA 917100000Mailing City,St,Zip: 5051 EDISON AVENUEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149399640Telephone: EMERIO MEDINAContact: CAD983657685GEPAID: 2008Year: 1000819768envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 1.33Tons: Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another SiteDisposal Method: Waste oil and mixed oilWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD028409019TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: CHINO, CA 917100000Mailing City,St,Zip: 5051 EDISON AVENUEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149399640Telephone: EMERIO MEDINAContact: CAD983657685GEPAID: 2008Year: 1000819768envid: HAZNET: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INC (Continued)1000819768 TC5029994.2s Page 101 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid orFacility Type: Santa Ana River 30I014758Facility ID: WDS: 15 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.6Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Other inorganic solid wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT080033681TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: CHINO, CA 917100000Mailing City,St,Zip: 5051 EDISON AVENUEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149399640Telephone: EMERIO MEDINAContact: CAD983657685GEPAID: 2005Year: 1000819768envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 5.175Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Waste oil and mixed oilWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD028409019TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: CHINO, CA 917100000Mailing City,St,Zip: 5051 EDISON AVENUEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149399640Telephone: EMERIO MEDINAContact: CAD983657685GEPAID: 2008Year: 1000819768envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 5.95Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Other inorganic solid wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD097030993TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INC (Continued) 1000819768 TC5029994.2s Page 102 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedWaste2: Not reportedWaste Type2: Not reportedPrimary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedSIC Code 2: 3479SIC Code: PrivateAgency Type: 7149399640Agency Telephone: TED LEBLANCAgency Contact: ANAHEIM 92805Agency City,St,Zip: 1800 E TALBOT WAYAgency Address: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INCAgency Name: TED LEBLANCFacility Contact: 7149399640Facility Telephone: 8Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INC (Continued) 1000819768 NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 12/16/1993Status Date: Refer: RWQCBStatus: 30280129Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 4261 ft. 0.807 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 158 ft. 1/2-1 ANAHEIM, CA 92804 NNW SLIC2211 EAST HOWELL STREET N/A 38 ENVIROSTORITASCO S101541102 TC5029994.2s Page 103 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 05/06/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Soil sample levels (11/04/83) below TTLC and TLC. excavated to depth of eight feet; 409 tons of soil removed to BKK. BKK (04/15/83). Samples (05/11/83) show solvent contamination. Site Preliminary Assessment Done: Twenty yards, three of waste, removed toComments: 01/08/1988Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: unlined sump. 1200ppm of TCE would remain within 8 feet of the surface in an backfilled with clean soil. It is not reasonable to believe that depth. No sampling was done below the 8 feet that was excavated and either surface samples or samp- les collected at a maximum if 8 ft. work at the site: Soil samples collected during cleanup in 1983 were recommends hazard ranking. Reasons for recommend- ation of further Site Inspection Done: EPA recommends Listing Site Inspec- tion; DHSComments: 09/26/1989Completed Date: *Site Inspection (SI) ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: firm acid rinse goes into manhole. Facility identified via tip from Orange County Sanitary District -Comments: 05/28/1981Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30280129Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD982359879Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: MICHAEL-RAND PLATINGAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: WITH METALS Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs * OTHER ORGANIC SOLIDS * OXYGENATED SOLVENTS * ACID SOLUTION 2>PHPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8857Longitude: 33.80735Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: * CERC2Special Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Referred - Not AssignedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: ITASCO (Continued)S101541102 TC5029994.2s Page 104 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported well 4/10-25. ACCORDING TO EPA, THIS SITE HAS LOW PRIORITY ON NPL LIST SITE TO EPA recommending GW Cleanup due to elevated levels of TCE in at the site and DHS approved closure on 11/8/1983. 1/9/89 DHS REFERED Soil Excavation at site in 1983 provided adequate remediation of soilSite History: Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern: Not reportedPotential Media Affected: Regional BoardFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: Not reportedCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -117.886132Longitude: 33.806987Latitude: SLT8R146Lead Agency Case Number: US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYLead Agency: SLT8R1464091Global Id: 01/09/1989Status Date: Open - RemediationFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: of contaminated soil was removed. RA Soil. Site has been hazard mitigated. Clean-up complete. 294 tonsComments: 11/08/1983Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Site Screening Done: CERCLA grant Preliminary Assessment required.Comments: ITASCO (Continued)S101541102 Not reportedAcres: EvaluationSite Type Detailed: EvaluationSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 12/05/2000Status Date: Refer: 1248 Local AgencyStatus: 30000017Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 4619 ft. 0.875 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 134 ft. 1/2-1 ORANGE, CA 92868 WSW 3745 WEST CHAPMAN AVENUE N/A 39 ENVIROSTORTHE CITY PLACE NORTH S103967976 TC5029994.2s Page 105 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30000017Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8935Longitude: 33.78952Latitude: Not ApplicableFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Referred - Not AssignedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: THE CITY PLACE NORTH (Continued) S103967976 * MmonroySupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 05/25/1988Status Date: Refer: Other AgencyStatus: 30340240Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 4767 ft. 0.903 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 174 ft. 1/2-1 ORANGE, CA 92666 ENE 811 WEST BARKLEY AVENUE N/A 40 ENVIROSTORORANGE COUNTY ELECTRIC S101481460 TC5029994.2s Page 106 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: LIQUID SUBSTANCE TO GROUND. SITE SCREENING DONE RATIONALE FOR PA: INDICATIONS OF A RELEASE OFComments: 11/13/1986Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: MANUFACTURED PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS NO FURTHER ACTION AT THIS TIME ELECTRIC CHANGED IT’S NAME TO ORANGE COUNTY ENTERPRISES FACILITY PRELIM ASSESS DONE ALL VIOLATION HAS BEEN CORRECTED ORANGE COUNTYComments: 05/25/1988Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DATABASE VALIDATION PROGRAM CONFIRMS NFA FOR DTSC.Comments: 10/27/1994Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTComments: 10/05/1982Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30340240Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: Cadmium and compounds Chromium VI Cyanide (free SOLUTION WITHOUT METALS * UNSPECIFIED SLUDGE WASTE Arsenic Lead SOLVENTS * CONTAMINATED SOIL * ACID SOLUTION 2>PH WITH METALS * ACID * HYDROCARBON SOLVENTS * Laboratory Waste Chemicals * OXYGENATEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8612Longitude: 33.80167Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: * CERC2Special Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: ORANGE COUNTY ELECTRIC (Continued) S101481460 TC5029994.2s Page 107 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1987Year: EMI: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/19/2001Completed Date: Phase 1 Non-SubmittalCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002562Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110008262824Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD073578734Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8644Longitude: 33.80635Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: 71002562Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 4985 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster I 0.944 mi.WDS Relative: Higher Actual: 165 ft. 1/2-1 NPDESORANGE, CA 92667 NE EMI1147 W. STRUCK AVENUE N/A I41 ENVIROSTORCADILLAC PLATING, INC.S106105044 TC5029994.2s Page 108 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSTATUS DATE: Not reportedSTATUS CODE NAME: Not reportedPROCESSED DATE: Not reportedRECEIVED DATE: 92867Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: OrangeDischarge City: 1147 W Struck AveDischarge Address: Cadillac PlatingDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 08/16/2016Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I026737WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder No: 209041Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: 0Agency Id: ActiveFacility Status: CAS000001Npdes Number: NPDES: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 76490Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 4Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 11332Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: CADILLAC PLATING, INC. (Continued)S106105044 TC5029994.2s Page 109 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8Region: Not reportedAgency Id: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedNpdes Number: Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: Not reportedPRIMARY SIC: Not reportedCERTIFICATION DATE: Not reportedCERTIFIER TITLE: Not reportedCERTIFIER NAME: Not reportedRECEIVING WATER NAME: Not reportedDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: Not reportedDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR TYPE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ZIP: Not reportedOPERATOR STATE: Not reportedOPERATOR CITY: Not reportedOPERATOR ADDRESS: Not reportedOPERATOR NAME: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT NAME: Not reportedPLACE SIZE UNIT: Not reportedPLACE SIZE: CADILLAC PLATING, INC. (Continued)S106105044 TC5029994.2s Page 110 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: 714-639-0342EMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: CaliforniaDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Private BusinessOPERATOR TYPE: richardamezaga@hotmail.comOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: 715-639-0342OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: gen mgrOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Richard amezagaOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: 92867OPERATOR ZIP: CaliforniaOPERATOR STATE: OrangeOPERATOR CITY: 1147 W Struck AveOPERATOR ADDRESS: Cadillac PlatingOPERATOR NAME: richardamezaga@hotmail.comFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: 714-639-0342FACILITY CONTACT PHONE: managerFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Richard AmezagaFACILITY CONTACT NAME: SqFtPLACE SIZE UNIT: 10000PLACE SIZE: 8/16/2016STATUS DATE: ActiveSTATUS CODE NAME: 8/16/2016PROCESSED DATE: 8/5/2016RECEIVED DATE: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I026737WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder No: 209041Regulatory Measure Id: CADILLAC PLATING, INC. (Continued)S106105044 TC5029994.2s Page 111 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedWaste2: Not reportedWaste Type2: Not reportedPrimary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedSIC Code 2: 0SIC Code: PrivateAgency Type: 7146390342Agency Telephone: ALFRED IBARRAAgency Contact: ORANGE 92667Agency City,St,Zip: 1147 W. STRUCK AVEAgency Address: CADILLAC PLATINGAgency Name: ALFRED IBARRAFacility Contact: 7146390342Facility Telephone: 8Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid orFacility Type: Santa Ana River 30I016171Facility ID: WDS: 3471-Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and ColoringTERTIARY SIC: 3471-Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and ColoringSECONDARY SIC: 3471-Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and ColoringPRIMARY SIC: 05-AUG-16CERTIFICATION DATE: managerCERTIFIER TITLE: Richard amezagaCERTIFIER NAME: santa ana river channelRECEIVING WATER NAME: NDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: CADILLAC PLATING, INC. (Continued) S106105044 TC5029994.2s Page 112 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and CADILLAC PLATING, INC. (Continued) S106105044 Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60000734Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8633Longitude: 33.80631Latitude: Not ApplicableFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: EvaluationSite Type Detailed: EvaluationSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 06/13/2007Status Date: Refer: 1248 Local AgencyStatus: 60000734Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 5037 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster I 0.954 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 168 ft. 1/2-1 Orange Co. Industrial SiteORANGE, CA 92867 NE CHMIRS1101 W. STRUCK AVE N/A I42 ENVIROSTORPAMARCO GLOBAL GRAPHICS S100279194 TC5029994.2s Page 113 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported#2 Pipeline: Not reported#1 Pipeline: Not reportedNumber of Fatalities: Not reportedNumber of Injuries: Not reportedEvacuations: Not reportedSubstance #3: Not reportedSubstance #2: Not reportedUnknown: Not reportedSubstance: 02-MAY-90E Date: Not reportedSite Type: Not reportedContained: Not reportedAmount: Not reportedAdmin Agency: 14-JAN-89Incident Date: Not reportedAgency: 88-92Year: Not reportedDate/Time: Not reportedOther: Not reportedMeasure: Not reportedType: Not reportedWhat Happened: Not reportedContainment: Not reportedCleanup By: Not reportedSpill Site: Not reportedWaterway: Not reportedWaterway Involved: 714 998-7202Facility Telephone: 14-JAN-89Report Date: CAPT. WILDERReporting Officer Name/ID: Not reportedCompany Name: Not reportedCA DOT PUC/ICC Number: Not reportedVehicle Id Number: Not reportedVehicle State: Not reportedVehicle License Number: Not reportedVehicle Make/year: 0Others Number Of Fatalities: 0Others Number Of Injuries: 0Others Number Of Decontaminated: 0Responding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: 0Responding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: 0Resp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: NMore Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reportedProperty Management: Not reportedEstimated Temperature: 600Surrounding Area: 1100Time Completed: 922Time Notified: 803Agency Incident Number: 30005Agency Id Number: 600Property Use: 14-JAN-89Date Completed: Not reportedOES Time: Not reportedOES Date: Not reportedOES notification: 904461OES Incident Number: CHMIRS: PAMARCO GLOBAL GRAPHICS (Continued)S100279194 TC5029994.2s Page 114 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CHROMIUM COMPOUNDSReleased Chemical: Closure certification issuedClosure Type: CLOSED 10/31/2007Current Status: RO0003436Record ID: 07IC008Case ID: Orange Co. Industrial Site: Not reportedDescription: Not reportedComments: Not reportedFatals: Not reportedInjuries: Not reportedEvacs: Not reported#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#3 Pipeline: PAMARCO GLOBAL GRAPHICS (Continued) S100279194 Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 0SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 79987Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: EMI: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002EAC3.pdfURL: 0002EAC3File Number: HIST UST: 5234 ft. 0.991 mi.HWP Relative: Higher Actual: 182 ft. 1/2-1 ICEORANGE, CA 92668 ENE EMI642 W NICOLAS AV N/A 43 HIST USTLEA RONAL INC S105938450 TC5029994.2s Page 115 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2899SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 79987Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1998Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2899SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 79987Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1997Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2899SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 79987Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1995Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: LEA RONAL INC (Continued)S105938450 TC5029994.2s Page 116 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAD001968361EPA ID: 3000990Envirostor ID: ICE: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2899SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 79987Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2001Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2899SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 79987Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2000Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2899SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 79987Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1999Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: LEA RONAL INC (Continued)S105938450 TC5029994.2s Page 117 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPublic Information Officer: Not reportedPublic Information Officer: 37Senate District: 68Assembly District: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedTeam: Not reportedFacility Size: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: -117.8607Longitude: 33.80098Latitude: KNOWN GENERATORSCleanup Status: CAD001968361EPA Id: HWP: Not reportedRTC Date: No ViolationsViolation Class: 05/17/2001Action Date: Financial Records Review - Standardized PermitAction Type: 07/30/2000RTC Date: MinorViolation Class: 04/28/2000Action Date: Compliance Evaluation Inspection - Standardized PermitAction Type: 06/15/2001RTC Date: MinorViolation Class: 05/31/2001Action Date: Compliance Evaluation Inspection - Standardized PermitAction Type: Not reportedRTC Date: No ViolationsViolation Class: 04/29/1999Action Date: Compliance Evaluation Inspection - Standardized PermitAction Type: Inspection: No ActionFacility Status: INSPECTIONSite Type: LEA RONAL INC (Continued)S105938450 TC5029994.2s Page 118 ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 3 records.ANAHEIM S112057181METROPOLITAN RESIDENTIAL (PARCEL B407-425 S. ANAHEIM BLVD., 100-92805ENVIROSTOR, VCPANAHEIM S120714356HOWELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT -2020, 2100, AND 2120 EAST HOWE92806ENVIROSTOR, SCHANAHEIM S120714357HOWELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT -2222 E. HOWELL AVE, 2223 & 22292806ENVIROSTOR, SCHTC5029994.2s Page 119 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 04/05/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 04/05/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5029994.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 04/05/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 02/07/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC5029994.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 02/07/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5029994.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 12/28/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 93 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 101 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 101 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5029994.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 09/26/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: 916-341-6320 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists TC5029994.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST: Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. TC5029994.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. TC5029994.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 98 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 10/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 10/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 10/17/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 09/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 10/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5029994.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER) Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC5029994.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5029994.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 03/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-327-5092 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 01/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 09/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 10/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 98 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC5029994.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 10/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/17/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 11/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5029994.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process. Date of Government Version: 01/03/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-323-7905 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 03/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5029994.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 05/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. TC5029994.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 93 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 08/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 02/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 93 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5029994.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Land Records LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 03/06/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 02/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5029994.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING DEED: Deed Restriction Listing Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 06/05/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 12/28/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 12/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 105 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Land Disposal sites (Landfills) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Military sites (consisting of: Military UST sites; Military Privatized sites; and Military Cleanup sites [formerly known as DoD non UST]) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5029994.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. TC5029994.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2017 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. TC5029994.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 133 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5029994.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 01/20/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016 Number of Days to Update: 127 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 04/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/24/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5029994.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. TC5029994.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2015 Number of Days to Update: 218 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Biennially INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 12/23/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. TC5029994.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 146 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 02/08/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. TC5029994.2s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 03/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 04/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 06/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016 Number of Days to Update: 91 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 03/19/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5029994.2s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 10/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 571-373-0407 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). Date of Government Version: 12/28/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 147 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 06/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5029994.2s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 104 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 06/05/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 05/16/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6066 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-255-1136 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICE: ICE Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections / Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control Telephone: 877-786-9427 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5029994.2s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 04/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/26/2017 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Site Location Listing A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2016 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-322-1080 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. Date of Government Version: 12/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 107 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation Telephone: 916-445-4038 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5029994.2s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 01/20/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water board?s review found that more than one-third of the region?s active disposal pits are operating without permission. Date of Government Version: 04/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/23/2015 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region Telephone: 559-445-5577 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5029994.2s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. TC5029994.2s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 04/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 04/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2047 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AMADOR COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 06/20/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies BUTTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. TC5029994.2s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 106 Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 04/25/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 104 Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COLUSA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 02/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 05/26/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEL NORTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 05/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies EL DORADO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. TC5029994.2s Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/19/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually GLENN COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 12/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2017 Number of Days to Update: 111 Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 830-934-6500 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies IMPERIAL COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 101 Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INYO COUNTY: TC5029994.2s Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 06/08/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies KERN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version: 02/07/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/10/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KINGS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 03/06/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LAKE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LASSEN COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 101 Source: Lassen County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-251-8528 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES COUNTY: TC5029994.2s Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3178 Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 04/18/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 115 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 04/17/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/18/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/13/2016 Number of Days to Update: 68 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 01/17/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/18/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 112 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5029994.2s Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 01/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/13/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 110 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MADERA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies MARIN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-473-6647 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MERCED COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 02/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONTEREY COUNTY: TC5029994.2s Page GR-36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies NAPA COUNTY: Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 05/08/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies ORANGE COUNTY: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. Date of Government Version: 05/03/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 11/04/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5029994.2s Page GR-37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 02/06/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 09/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2016 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-745-2363 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PLUMAS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Plumas County CUPA Program facilities. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Plumas County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-283-6355 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 04/18/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 1 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 01/19/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 98 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. TC5029994.2s Page GR-38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/06/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 127 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 11/08/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BENITO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 11/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2017 Number of Days to Update: 105 Source: San Benito County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/13/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 06/05/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5029994.2s Page GR-39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 03/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 06/05/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/16/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: TC5029994.2s Page GR-40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-686-8167 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SANTA CLARA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 02/22/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 89 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5029994.2s Page GR-41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 05/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SHASTA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SOLANO COUNTY: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 11/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/21/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 1 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list TC5029994.2s Page GR-42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly STANISLAUS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/16/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection Telephone: 209-525-6751 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SUTTER COUNTY: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 12/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TEHAMA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 05/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 93 Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 530-527-8020 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TRINITY COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 106 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 760-352-0381 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TULARE COUNTY: TC5029994.2s Page GR-43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa program facilities Date of Government Version: 01/05/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/10/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2017 Number of Days to Update: 104 Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 559-624-7400 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/27/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 105 Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies VENTURA COUNTY: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 12/27/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 103 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 09/26/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2017 Number of Days to Update: 89 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5029994.2s Page GR-44 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 02/27/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/15/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually YUBA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 01/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 112 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Telephone: 530-749-7523 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 107 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5029994.2s Page GR-45 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 01/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 123 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. TC5029994.2s Page GR-46 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish & Game Telephone: 916-445-0411 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5029994.2s Page GR-47 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING TC5029994.2s Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2012Version Date: 5641308 ORANGE, CAEast Map: 2012Version Date: 5641294 ANAHEIM, CATarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 148 ft. above sea levelElevation: 3739666.5UTM Y (Meters): 418608.1UTM X (Meters): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 117.879231 - 117˚ 52’ 45.23’’Longitude (West): 33.795781 - 33˚ 47’ 44.81’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES ORANGE, CA 92806 NA ORANGEWOOD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® TC5029994.2s Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 148 ft. North South West East152141138138132132132137140148150150152156159161165168169141142143144144144145147148148148151153154155158161165171General SSWGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5029994.2s Page A-3 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile SSE10 GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. Information is inferred in the CERCLIS investigation report(s) Data Quality: No information about a sole source aquifer is available Sole Source Aquifer: aquifers underlying the site. Information is not available about the hydraulic connection between Hydraulic Connection: 75 feet to 90 feet. Inferred Depth to Water: South Groundwater Flow Direction: CAD008364150 Site EPA ID Number: Neville Chem Co Site Name: 1 - 2 Miles NNW Location Relative to TP: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapANAHEIM NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property FEMA FIRM Flood data06059C0161J Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type FEMA FIRM Flood data06059C0142J Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type FEMA FLOOD ZONE and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5029994.2s Page A-4 For additional site information, refer to Physical Setting Source Map Findings. Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile SSW5G Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile SSE4G Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile NW3G SW1/2 - 1 Mile NNW2G WNW1/2 - 1 Mile NNW1G Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile NW20 WNW1/2 - 1 Mile NNW17 SW1/2 - 1 Mile NNWE15 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile SSW13 GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5029994.2s Page A-5 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra: QuaternarySystem: QuaternarySeries: QCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 3 1 3 2 4 4 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles TC5029994.2s Page A-7 Max: Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular sandy loam coarse sand to stratified59 inches 5 inches 2 Max: Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsand 5 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 31 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: All hydric Soil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: sandSoil Surface Texture: RIVERWASHSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5029994.2s Page A-8 > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels. Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: loamy sandSoil Surface Texture: METZSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 3 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 1 Max: 14.11 Not reportedNot reported sandy clay loam stratified59 inches46 inches 4 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 4 Max: 14 Not reportedNot reportedsilt loam46 inches40 inches 3 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 4 Max: 14 Not reportedNot reported loam to sandy clay stratified sand40 inches16 inches 2 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 42 Max: 141 Not reportedNot reportedloamy sand16 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels. Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: loamy sandSoil Surface Texture: METZSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5029994.2s Page A-9 Min: 7.4 Max: 8.4 Min: 14 Max: 42 Not reportedNot reportedfine sandy loam27 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Soil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: fine sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: HUENEMESoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 4 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 4 Max: 14 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular loam to fine sandy stratified sand62 inches16 inches 2 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 4 Max: 14 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularloamy sand16 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5029994.2s Page A-10 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NorthCADW60000003021 A1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. No PWS System Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1/2 - 1 Mile NNEUSGS40000138332 F25 1/2 - 1 Mile NEUSGS40000138325 F21 1/2 - 1 Mile SSWUSGS40000138179 11 1/2 - 1 Mile WestUSGS40000138237 D9 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNWUSGS40000138265 B5 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 0.001 milesFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS Min: 7.4 Max: 8.4 Min: 14 Max: 42 Not reportedNot reported to silt loam stratified sand59 inches27 inches 2 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5029994.2s Page A-11 1/2 - 1 Mile NWCADW60000016755 27 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW5150 H26 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW5149 H24 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW5184 G23 1/2 - 1 Mile SSW5183 G22 1/2 - 1 Mile WestCADW60000014951 19 1/2 - 1 Mile SWCADW60000016980 18 1/2 - 1 Mile WSWCADW60000016971 16 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWCADW60000014713 E14 1/2 - 1 Mile WestCADW60000016757 D12 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NW5152 C8 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NW5151 C7 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NW5148 C6 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNW5145 B4 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NorthCADW60000003019 A3 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NorthCADW60000003020 A2 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.1601 601601601601 2 0 1201 2 0 161601 60 1 6 0 160160CA TC5029994.2s Page A-13 OrangeCounty name: 30County id: ObservationWell use descrip: 1Well use id: ’SAR-3/MP1’Local well name: 04S10W25G001SState well numbe: 337995N1178787W001Site code: -117.878657Longitude: 33.799513Latitude: 3019Objectid: A3 North 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CADW60000003019CA WELLS CADW60000003020Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc: ’8-1’Basin code: OrangeCounty name: 30County id: ObservationWell use descrip: 1Well use id: ’SAR-3/MP11’Local well name: Not ReportedState well numbe: 337995N1178787W002Site code: -117.878657Longitude: 33.799513Latitude: 3020Objectid: A2 North 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CADW60000003020CA WELLS CADW60000003021Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc: ’8-1’Basin code: OrangeCounty name: 30County id: ObservationWell use descrip: 1Well use id: ’SAR-3/MP6’Local well name: Not ReportedState well numbe: 337995N1178787W003Site code: -117.878657Longitude: 33.799513Latitude: 3021Objectid: A1 North 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher CADW60000003021CA WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5029994.2s Page A-14 ftWellholedepth units: 478Wellholedepth:ftWelldepth units: 447Welldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Unconfined single aquiferAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: 2.5Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 147Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: 24000Sourcemap scale:-117.8839464Longitude: 33.7980718Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:Not ReportedHuc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 004S010W25F001SMonloc name: USGS-334753117525901Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: B5 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher USGS40000138265FED USGS Not ReportedArea Served: Unknown, Small SystemConnections:Unknown, Small SystemPop Served: Not Reported Organization That Operates System: ANACO RANCHSystem Name: 3000849System Number: WELL 01 - DESTROYEDSource Name: 1,000 Feet (10 Seconds)Precision:334750.0 1175300.0Source Lat/Long: DestroyedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3000849001FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-24F01 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: B4 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 5145CA WELLS CADW60000003019Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc: ’8-1’Basin code: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5029994.2s Page A-15 WELL 11 - DESTROYEDSource Name: UndefinedPrecision:334800.0 1175300.0Source Lat/Long: DestroyedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3010027011FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-26J02 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: C8 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 5152CA WELLS ORANGEArea Served: 30144Connections:116800Pop Served: ORANGE 92666 P O BOX 449 Organization That Operates System: CITY OF ORANGESystem Name: 3010027System Number: WELL 12 - DESTROYEDSource Name: UndefinedPrecision:334800.0 1175300.0Source Lat/Long: DestroyedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3010027012FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-26J01 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: C7 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 5151CA WELLS ANAHEIMArea Served: 57397Connections:292900Pop Served: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 P.O. BOX 3222 (#559) Organization That Operates System: City of AnaheimSystem Name: 3010001System Number: WELL 033Source Name: UndefinedPrecision:334800.0 1175300.0Source Lat/Long: Active UntreatedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3010001026FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-25F01 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: C6 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 5148CA WELLS 1999-04-20 85 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5029994.2s Page A-16 1973-01-05 115.80 1972-10-31 114.90 1973-05-10 115.00 1973-03-05 114.50 1973-09-12 136.00 1973-07-06 123.80 1974-01-24 115.30 1973-11-02 120.30 1974-04-21 116.40 1974-03-19 114.50 1974-08-30 113.60 1974-07-03 114.00 1975-01-02 116.60 1974-10-22 115.40 1975-04-30 121.50 1975-03-19 117.90 1975-11-06 126.50 1975-07-02 132.00 1976-05-04 121.20 1976-03-08 123.00 1976-12-28 122.70 1976-10-29 126.80 1978-09-26 104.58 1977-10-28 132.50 1979-02-07 99.55 1978-11-03 103.05 1979-08-06 98.73 1979-05-02 93.80 1980-02-14 97.67 1979-11-14 100.42 1981-05-07 78.66 1980-06-11 80.08 Note: The measurement was discontinued. 1982-05-17 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 37 ftWellholedepth units: 341Wellholedepth:ftWelldepth units: 338Welldepth:19290427Construction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: 2.5Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 144.50Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: 24000Sourcemap scale:-117.8883909Longitude: 33.7961274Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070201Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 004S010W25E001SMonloc name: USGS-334746117531501Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: D9 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000138237FED USGS ORANGEArea Served: 30144Connections:116800Pop Served: ORANGE 92666 P O BOX 449 Organization That Operates System: CITY OF ORANGESystem Name: 3010027System Number: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5029994.2s Page A-17 D12 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADW60000016757CA WELLS 1986 106 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 ftWellholedepth units: 1210Wellholedepth:ftWelldepth units: 1150Welldepth:19860527Construction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: 5Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 135Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Global positioning system (GPS), uncorrectedHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:.5Horiz Acc measure: 24000Sourcemap scale:-117.881361Longitude: 33.7876944Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:Not ReportedHuc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 004S010W36C002SMonloc name: USGS-334716117525301Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: 11 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000138179FED USGS Date:10/06/1997 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth:84 ft Shallow Water Depth: 77 ft Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:083002913T10 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 69401AQUIFLOW 1972-10-10 115.60 1972-10-03 114.00 1972-10-24 114.40 1972-10-17 114.60 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, continued. ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5029994.2s Page A-18 16 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADW60000016971CA WELLS Date:11/21/1994 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth:75 Shallow Water Depth: 50 Groundwater Flow:SW Site ID:083001785TE15 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 65064AQUIFLOW CADW60000014713Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc: ’8-1’Basin code: OrangeCounty name: 30County id: UnknownWell use descrip: 6Well use id: ’’Local well name: 04S10W25D001SState well numbe: 338039N1178852W001Site code: -117.8852Longitude: 33.8039Latitude: 14713Objectid: E14 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADW60000014713CA WELLS Date:01/29/1997 Average Water Depth: 79.8 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:083000274T13 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 54867AQUIFLOW CADW60000016757Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc: ’8-1’Basin code: OrangeCounty name: 30County id: UnknownWell use descrip: 6Well use id: ’’Local well name: 04S10W25E001SState well numbe: 337961N1178893W001Site code: -117.8893Longitude: 33.7961Latitude: 16757Objectid: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5029994.2s Page A-19 OrangeCounty name: 30County id: UnknownWell use descrip: 6Well use id: ’’Local well name: 04S10W26J001SState well numbe: 337945N1178924W001Site code: -117.8924Longitude: 33.7945Latitude: 14951Objectid: 19 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADW60000014951CA WELLS CADW60000016980Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc: ’8-1’Basin code: OrangeCounty name: 30County id: UnknownWell use descrip: 6Well use id: ’’Local well name: 04S10W35A003SState well numbe: 337889N1178892W001Site code: -117.8892Longitude: 33.7889Latitude: 16980Objectid: 18 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADW60000016980CA WELLS Date:07/15/1993 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth:84.77 Shallow Water Depth: 81.96 Groundwater Flow:WNW Site ID:083000236T17 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 54991AQUIFLOW CADW60000016971Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc: ’8-1’Basin code: OrangeCounty name: 30County id: UnknownWell use descrip: 6Well use id: ’’Local well name: 04S10W26J002SState well numbe: 337932N1178916W001Site code: -117.8916Longitude: 33.7932Latitude: 16971Objectid: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5029994.2s Page A-20 G22 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 5183CA WELLS 1956 179 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 ftWellholedepth units: 870Wellholedepth:ftWelldepth units: 870Welldepth:19560517Construction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: 5Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 170Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Global positioning system (GPS), uncorrectedHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:.5Horiz Acc measure: 24000Sourcemap scale:-117.8705833Longitude: 33.8062222Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:Not ReportedHuc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 004S010W24J001SMonloc name: USGS-334822117521401Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: F21 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher USGS40000138325FED USGS Date:10/19/1994 Average Water Depth: 120 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:083001205T20 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 34025AQUIFLOW CADW60000014951Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc: ’8-1’Basin code: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5029994.2s Page A-21 FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.41 MG/LFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: SULFATEChemical: 109. MG/LFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: CHLORIDEChemical: 66.8 MG/LFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: POTASSIUMChemical: 3. MG/LFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: SODIUMChemical: 46.3 MG/LFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: MAGNESIUMChemical: 15.2 MG/LFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: CALCIUMChemical: 85.7 MG/LFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 277. MG/LFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 196. MG/LFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 161. MG/LFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: PH, LABORATORYChemical: 8.2Findings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 772. USFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: COLORChemical: 3. UNITSFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2.36 MG/LFindings:25-APR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.36 MG/LFindings:25-APR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2.36 MG/LFindings:25-APR-16Sample Collected: ORANGEArea Served: 30144Connections:116800Pop Served: ORANGE 92666 P O BOX 449 Organization That Operates System: CITY OF ORANGESystem Name: 3010027System Number: WELL 20Source Name: 1 Mile (One Minute)Precision:334700.0 1175300.0Source Lat/Long: Active UntreatedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3010027018FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-36C02 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5029994.2s Page A-22 PH, LABORATORYChemical: 8.Findings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 799. USFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: COLORChemical: 3. UNITSFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: RADIUM, TOTAL, MDA95-NTNC ONLY, BY 903.0Chemical: 0.418 PCI/LFindings:13-MAR-14Sample Collected: RA-226 OR TOTAL RA BY 903.0 C.E.Chemical: 0.11 PCI/LFindings:13-MAR-14Sample Collected: RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical: 0.2 PCI/LFindings:13-MAR-14Sample Collected: URANIUM MDA95Chemical: 0.3 PCI/LFindings:13-MAR-14Sample Collected: GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical: 1.11 PCI/LFindings:13-MAR-14Sample Collected: URANIUM COUNTING ERRORChemical: 1.22 PCI/LFindings:13-MAR-14Sample Collected: URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical: 3.79 PCI/LFindings:13-MAR-14Sample Collected: RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.491 PCI/LFindings:13-MAR-14Sample Collected: GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical: 2.27 PCI/LFindings:13-MAR-14Sample Collected: GROSS ALPHAChemical: 8.67 PCI/LFindings:13-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2130. MG/LFindings:06-MAR-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 9.4 MG/LFindings:06-MAR-13Sample Collected: NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2110. MG/LFindings:27-FEB-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 9.3 MG/LFindings:27-FEB-12Sample Collected: NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2200. MG/LFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: BROMIDEChemical: 0.12 MG/LFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical: 0.6 NTUFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 9.69 MG/LFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 468. MG/LFindings:27-JUN-11Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5029994.2s Page A-23 NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1.94 MG/LFindings:26-JAN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.93 MG/LFindings:26-JAN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2530. MG/LFindings:25-FEB-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 11.2 MG/LFindings:25-FEB-15Sample Collected: NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2420. MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: BROMIDEChemical: 0.14 MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical: 0.2 NTUFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 10.7 MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 476. MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: VANADIUMChemical: 3.5 UG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: BARIUMChemical: 104. UG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.38 MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: SULFATEChemical: 113. MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: CHLORIDEChemical: 66.3 MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: POTASSIUMChemical: 3.3 MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: SODIUMChemical: 47.3 MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: MAGNESIUMChemical: 15.1 MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: CALCIUMChemical: 90. MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 287. MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)Chemical: 0.51 MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 170. MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 170. MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5029994.2s Page A-24 24000Sourcemap scale:-117.8704167Longitude: 33.8071944Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:Not ReportedHuc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 004S010W24J002SMonloc name: USGS-334826117521401Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: F25 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher USGS40000138332FED USGS Not ReportedArea Served: Unknown, Small SystemConnections:Unknown, Small SystemPop Served: Not Reported Organization That Operates System: TV MOTEL APARTMENTSSystem Name: 3000520System Number: WELL 01 - DESTROYEDSource Name: 1,000 Feet (10 Seconds)Precision:334759.0 1175337.0Source Lat/Long: DestroyedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3000520001FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-26C05 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: H24 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 5149CA WELLS ORANGEArea Served: 30144Connections:116800Pop Served: ORANGE 92666 P O BOX 449 Organization That Operates System: CITY OF ORANGESystem Name: 3010027System Number: WELL 13 - INACTIVESource Name: UndefinedPrecision:334700.0 1175300.0Source Lat/Long: Inactive RawWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3010027013FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-36D03 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: G23 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 5184CA WELLS NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.36 MG/LFindings:25-APR-16Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5029994.2s Page A-25 OrangeCounty name: 30County id: UnknownWell use descrip: 6Well use id: ’’Local well name: 04S10W23R001SState well numbe: 338069N1178895W001Site code: -117.8895Longitude: 33.8069Latitude: 16755Objectid: 27 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADW60000016755CA WELLS Not ReportedArea Served: Unknown, Small SystemConnections:Unknown, Small SystemPop Served: Not Reported Organization That Operates System: KEESEE TANK&PUMP COSystem Name: 3000817System Number: WELL 01 - DESTROYEDSource Name: 1,000 Feet (10 Seconds)Precision:334800.0 1175338.0Source Lat/Long: DestroyedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3000817001FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-26C06 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: H26 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 5150CA WELLS 1962 110 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 ftWellholedepth units: 910Wellholedepth:ftWelldepth units: 910Welldepth:1962Construction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: 5Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 170Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Global positioning system (GPS), uncorrectedHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:.5Horiz Acc measure: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5029994.2s Page A-26 Date: 01/29/1997 Average Water Depth: 79.8 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:083000274T5G SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 54867AQUIFLOW Date:10/06/1997 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth:84 ft Shallow Water Depth: 77 ft Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:083002913T4G SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 69401AQUIFLOW Date:10/19/1994 Average Water Depth: 120 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:083001205T3G NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 34025AQUIFLOW Date:11/21/1994 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth:75 Shallow Water Depth: 50 Groundwater Flow:SW Site ID:083001785T2G NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 65064AQUIFLOW Date:07/15/1993 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth:84.77 Shallow Water Depth: 81.96 Groundwater Flow:WNW Site ID:083000236T1G NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 54991AQUIFLOW CADW60000016755Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc: ’8-1’Basin code: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5029994.2s Page A-27 Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedBasement Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor 0%0%100%1.000 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor % >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea Number of sites tested: 1 Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 92806 : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for ORANGE County: 3 12992806 ______________________ > 4 pCi/LNum TestsZipcode Radon Test Results State Database: CA Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish & Game Telephone: 916-445-0411 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC5029994.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. RADON State Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-324-2208 Radon Database for California Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. TC5029994.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5029994.2s Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED Mr. Steve Shinners - 2 - November 10, 2009 certified laboratory for analysis of VOCs and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH). The analytical data indicated that the soil contained only hydrocarbons, and no VOCs were detected. Confirmatory soil samples were collected from the bottom of the well and the top of the excavation pile, and analyzed using U.S. EPA Method 8015 (Modified). The results indicated that gasoline range hydrocarbons were present in the soil at concentrations of 110 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and 5 mglkg, respectively, in the diesel range. Toluene and xylene were the only detected constituents, at concentrations below the action levels identified in the State Water Resources Control Board's California Leaking Underground Fuel Tank (LUFT) Manual. Staff from the Orange County Fire Department concluded that no further soil treatment was required at the site. Between June 1987 and November 1988, six groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-$) were installed at the site. Groundwater monitoring was conducted from June 1987 to April 1990, with analysis for VOCs and TPH. Contaminants detected in the samples included 1,1,1 trichloroethane (TCA), trichloroethylene (TCE), tetrachloroethylene (PC E) and 1,1 dichloroethylene (DC E). The concentrations of TCA, TCE, PCE and DCE in groundwater ranged from 10 micrograms per liter (l-IglI) to 20 I-Ig/l; 10 I-IglI to 90 1-19/1; 10 I-IglI to 40 I-IglI and non-detect to 30 1-191I, respectively. The highest concentrations of VOCs were found in MW-2, the most upgradient groundwater monitoring well at this site. VOCs from Upgradient Source In 1983, the Inland Specialty Chemical Corporation's (later known as ISCI, Inc.) facility, located at 2023 Collins Street in the City of Orange, was identified as a significant source ofVOCs in groundwater. ISCI was a chemical manufacturing facility located about 1,600 feet upgradient of the former Yellow Freight site. Subsequent to our April 19, 1990 letter to Yellow Freight, groundwater investigations conducted by ISCI concluded that ISCI's groundwater plume might have extended to a maximum distance of 6,500 feet downgradient of their facility, and that other off-site sources had also contributed significantly to the groundwater impacts within the area of the plume. The Yellow Freight site is located within this impacted area. Determination of No Further Action At this time, there is no evidence that the former Yellow Freight Terminal is a source of VOCs in groundwater. On the condition that the information that was provided to this agency is accurate and representative of existing conditions at the site, no further action is required for the soil or groundwater at the site. As with any real property, if previously unidentified contamination is discovered at the former Yellow Freight Terminal site in the future, additional assessment, investigation andlor remediation may be required. California Environmental Protection Agency o il£cycled Pope, Mr. Steve Shinners - 3 - November 10, 2009 As part of this no further action determination for the site, you may decommission the six groundwater monitoring wells. Please be aware that the wells must be decommissioned according to the approved State and County requirements and standards for water wells. A report of decommissioning of the wells must be submitted within 30 days of completion of these activities. Please notify us at least ten working days in advance of well abandonment activity at this site. If you have any questions, please contact Maneck G. Chichgar, Project Manager, at (951) 782-3252, or you may call Ann Sturdivant, Chief of our Site Cleanup Section, at (951) 782-4904. Sincerely, APPENDIX C: DOCUMENTATION United States Department of Agriculture A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California Orangewood Ave Improvements Natural Resources Conservation Service August 28, 2017 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface....................................................................................................................2 Soil Map..................................................................................................................5 Soil Map................................................................................................................6 Legend..................................................................................................................7 Map Unit Legend..................................................................................................9 Map Unit Descriptions.......................................................................................... 9 Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California................................11 158—Hueneme fine sandy loam, drained................................................... 11 164—Metz loamy sand, moderately fine substratum..................................12 191—Riverwash..........................................................................................14 References............................................................................................................15 4 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 5 6 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 37396803739740373980037398603739920373998037400403739680373974037398003739860373992037399803740040418510 418570 418630 418690 418750 418810 418870 418930 418990 419050 418450 418510 418570 418630 418690 418750 418810 418870 418930 418990 419050 33° 47' 51'' N 117° 52' 51'' W33° 47' 51'' N117° 52' 27'' W33° 47' 38'' N 117° 52' 51'' W33° 47' 38'' N 117° 52' 27'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 11N WGS84 0 100 200 400 600Feet 0 40 80 160 240Meters Map Scale: 1:2,770 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 30, 2016 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: May 3, 2010—Nov 26, 2014 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background Custom Soil Resource Report 7 MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Custom Soil Resource Report 8 Map Unit Legend Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California (CA678) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 158 Hueneme fine sandy loam, drained 2.9 33.5% 164 Metz loamy sand, moderately fine substratum 1.8 21.4% 191 Riverwash 3.9 45.1% Totals for Area of Interest 8.6 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The Custom Soil Resource Report 9 delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. Custom Soil Resource Report 10 Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California 158—Hueneme fine sandy loam, drained Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: hcn3 Mean annual precipitation: 15 inches Frost-free period: 300 to 350 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Hueneme and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Hueneme Setting Landform: Alluvial fans Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Convex Parent material: Stratified alluvium derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile H1 - 0 to 27 inches: fine sandy loam H2 - 27 to 60 inches: stratified sand to silt loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 1 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Very slightly saline to slightly saline (2.0 to 4.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 9.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 1 Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3c Hydrologic Soil Group: A Hydric soil rating: Yes Minor Components Bolsa, silt loam, drained Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 11 San emigdio, fine sandy loam Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Hueneme, fine sandy loam Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No 164—Metz loamy sand, moderately fine substratum Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: hcn9 Elevation: 0 to 600 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 17 inches Mean annual air temperature: 63 to 65 degrees F Frost-free period: 320 to 365 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Metz and similar soils: 75 percent Minor components: 25 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Metz Setting Landform: Alluvial fans Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Riser Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Parent material: Mixed alluvium derived from igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rock Typical profile A - 0 to 17 inches: loamy sand C1 - 17 to 40 inches: stratified sand to sandy clay loam C2 - 40 to 46 inches: silty clay loam C3 - 46 to 60 inches: stratified sand to sandy clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained Runoff class: Negligible Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: Rare Frequency of ponding: None Custom Soil Resource Report 12 Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 5 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: SANDY (1975) (R019XD035CA) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Metz, loamy sand Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Alluvial fans Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Riser Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Hydric soil rating: No San emigdio Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Flood plains Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Riser Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Hydric soil rating: No Corralitos, loamy sand Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Alluvial fans Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Riser Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Hydric soil rating: No Hueneme, fine sandy loam Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Alluvial fans Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Riser Down-slope shape: Linear Across-slope shape: Linear Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report 13 191—Riverwash Map Unit Composition Riverwash: 100 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Riverwash Setting Landform: Fans Parent material: Sandy and gravelly alluvium Typical profile C1 - 0 to 6 inches: gravelly sand C2 - 6 to 60 inches: stratified gravelly coarse sand to sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 5 percent Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 to 24 inches Frequency of flooding: Frequent Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 2.9 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8w Hydric soil rating: Yes Custom Soil Resource Report 14 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 15 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf Custom Soil Resource Report 16 EDR Historical Topo Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com with QuadMatch™ Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 August 22, 2017 5029994.4 EDR Historical Topo Map Report EDR Inquiry # Search Results: P.O.# Project: Maps Provided: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- Coordinates: Latitude: Longitude: UTM Zone: UTM X Meters: UTM Y Meters: Elevation: Contact: Site Name: Client Name: 2012 1981 1972 1964, 1965 1950 1949 1942 1935 1932 1902 1901 1898 1896 08/22/17 Orangewood Avenue Improvements Michael Baker International NA 14725 Alton Parkway Orange, CA 92806 Irvine, CA 92618 5029994.4 Jessica Ditto EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Michael Baker International were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s. 159416 Task 007-Haz Mat 33.795781 33° 47' 45" North Phase I ESA -117.879231 -117° 52' 45" West Zone 11 North 418609.91 3739860.33 148.00' above sea level This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5029994 4 2 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 2012 Source Sheets 2012 Orange 7.5-minute, 24000 2012 Anaheim 7.5-minute, 24000 1981 Source Sheets 1981 Orange 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1978 1981 Anaheim 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1963 1972 Source Sheets 1972 Orange 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1972 1972 Anaheim 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1972 1964, 1965 Source Sheets 1964 Orange 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1963 1965 Anaheim 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1963 5029994 4 3 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1950 Source Sheets 1950 Orange 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1946 1950 Anaheim 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1947 1949 Source Sheets 1949 Orange 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1946 1949 Anaheim 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1947 1942 Source Sheets 1942 ANAHEIM 15-minute, 50000 1935 Source Sheets 1935 Garden Grove 7.5-minute, 31680 1935 Orange 7.5-minute, 31680 5029994 4 4 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1932 Source Sheets 1932 Orange 7.5-minute, 31680 1902 Source Sheets 1902 Corona 30-minute, 125000 1901 Source Sheets 1901 Anaheim 15-minute, 62500 1898 Source Sheets 1898 Anaheim 15-minute, 62500 5029994 4 5 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1896 Source Sheets 1896 Anaheim 15-minute, 62500 5029994 4 6 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 2012 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 Michael Baker International TP, Anaheim, 2012, 7.5-minute E, Orange, 2012, 7.5-minute 5029994 4 7 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1981 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 Michael Baker International TP, Anaheim, 1981, 7.5-minute E, Orange, 1981, 7.5-minute 5029994 4 8 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1972 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 Michael Baker International TP, Anaheim, 1972, 7.5-minute E, Orange, 1972, 7.5-minute 5029994 4 9 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1964, 1965 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 Michael Baker International TP, Anaheim, 1965, 7.5-minute E, Orange, 1964, 7.5-minute 5029994 4 10 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1950 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 Michael Baker International TP, Anaheim, 1950, 7.5-minute E, Orange, 1950, 7.5-minute 5029994 4 11 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1949 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 Michael Baker International TP, Anaheim, 1949, 7.5-minute E, Orange, 1949, 7.5-minute 5029994 4 12 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1942 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 Michael Baker International TP, ANAHEIM, 1942, 15-minute 5029994 4 13 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1935 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 Michael Baker International TP, Garden Grove, 1935, 7.5-minute E, Orange, 1935, 7.5-minute 5029994 4 14 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1932 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 Michael Baker International E, Orange, 1932, 7.5-minute 5029994 4 15 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1902 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 Michael Baker International TP, Corona, 1902, 30-minute 5029994 4 16 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1901 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 Michael Baker International TP, Anaheim, 1901, 15-minute 5029994 4 17 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1898 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 Michael Baker International TP, Anaheim, 1898, 15-minute 5029994 4 18 Historical Topo Map page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). - EW SW S SE NW N NE 1896 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 Michael Baker International TP, Anaheim, 1896, 15-minute 5029994 4 19 The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 August 23, 2017 5029994.9 Contact:EDR Inquiry # Search Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Year Details SourceScale EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Site Name: Client Name: 2012 1"=500'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2010 1"=500'Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2009 1"=500'Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2005 1"=500'Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP 1995 1"=500'Acquisition Date: October 03, 1995 USGS/DOQQ 1990 1"=500'Flight Date: September 06, 1990 USDA 1989 1"=500'Flight Date: August 03, 1989 USDA 1985 1"=500'Flight Date: September 13, 1985 USDA 1977 1"=500'Flight Date: January 18, 1977 EDR Proprietary Brewster Pacific 1972 1"=500'Flight Date: October 30, 1972 USGS 1966 1"=500'Flight Date: April 16, 1966 USGS 1963 1"=500'Flight Date: February 28, 1963 USGS 1952 1"=500'Flight Date: December 26, 1952 USDA 1947 1"=500'Flight Date: June 17, 1947 USGS 1938 1"=500'Flight Date: June 21, 1938 USDA 08/23/17 Orangewood Avenue Improvements Michael Baker International NA 14725 Alton Parkway Orange, CA 92806 Irvine, CA 92618 5029994.9 Jessica Ditto This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5029994 9 2 5029994.9 2012 = 500' 5029994.9 2010 = 500' 5029994.9 2009 = 500' 5029994.9 2005 = 500' 5029994.9 1995 = 500' 5029994.9 1990 = 500' 5029994.9 1989 = 500' 5029994.9 1985 = 500' 5029994.9 1977 = 500' 5029994.9 1972 = 500' 5029994.9 1966 = 500' 5029994.9 1963 = 500' 5029994.9 1952 = 500' 5029994.9 1947 = 500' 5029994.9 1938 = 500' Orangew ood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 Inquiry Number: 5029994.5 August 23, 2017 The EDR-City Directory Abstract 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc EDR CITY DIRECTORY REPORT Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assistenvironmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities.EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals. NO COVERAGE Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Certified Sanborn® Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Orangewood Avenue Improvements NA Orange, CA 92806 August 22, 2017 5029994.3 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Certified Sanborn Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Contact:EDR Inquiry # Site Name: Client Name: Certification # PO # Project 08/22/17 NA Orangewood Avenue Improvements Michael Baker International 14725 Alton Parkway Orange, CA 92806 5029994.3 Irvine, CA 92618 Jessica Ditto The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Michael Baker International were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 3B59-40EC-BAA2 159416 Task 007-Haz Mat UNMAPPED PROPERTY Phase I ESA This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Certification #: 3B59-40EC-BAA2 Michael Baker International (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5029994 3 2 + – 10 A ccessibility Find My Current Location or Street: City: Zip:Find Display a 1500 foot  buffer Buffer radius is limited to 10 mi (52800ft). Find By Location Find By API Find By Lat, Long Find By PLSS Find By Oil ⁄ Gas Field Data (Layers): DOC Services Notices & Permits DOGGR Wells Label: API#Well# Detailed EPA Wells for Aquifer Exemption Review Enhanced Oil Recovery Wells Disposal Wells TR26 Onshore Seeps Oil ⁄ Gas Fields California Geologic Map DOGGR Districts Public Land Survey System Cities State Assembly Districts State Senate Districts Congressional Districts Counties Lat: 33.790 Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Resources Well Finder Page 1 of 1Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Resources Well Finder 8/30/2017https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/ APPENDIX D: QUALIFICATIONS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | D-1 QUALIFICATIONS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) prepared by Michael Baker reflect the most current interpretations of industry standards, which are in accordance with the ASTM International (ASTM) E 1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments. KEY PERSONNEL This Phase I ESA was overseen by Ms. Kristen Bogue, who also conducted quality assurance/quality control. Document research and records gathering was conducted by Ms. Jessica Ditto. Site reconnaissance was conducted by both Ms. Kristen Bogue and Ms. Jessica Ditto. Kristen Bogue Environmental Professional Ms. Bogue graduated from the University of California, Irvine, with a degree in Environmental Analysis and Design. Mr. Bogue’s professional environmental experience of nine years includes the management, review, and preparation of hazardous material assessments, which include: Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Initial Site Assessments for the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Preliminary Hazardous Material Assessments, Existing Hazardous Material Conditions Assessments, and Environmental Baseline Surveys for the Department of the Navy for sites located throughout California, Arizona, and New Mexico. As an environmental analyst, Ms. Bogue is also involved with preparation of Environmental Documentation compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)/National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA), Visual Impact Assessments (VIAs), field studies, as well as various technical studies in support of CEQA and NEPA. In the past nine years Ms. Bogue has personally evaluated over 250 real properties in California. Jessica Ditto Environmental Analyst Ms. Ditto graduated from University of California, Los Angeles, California, with a degree in Communication. As an Environmental Analyst at Michael Baker, Ms. Ditto is involved with the preparation of technical studies in support of environmental documents and the preparation of Appendix D | Qualifications of the Environmental Professional Orangewood Avenue Improvements Phase I ESA | D-2 environmental documents in compliance with CEQA and NEPA. Ms. Ditto’s professional experience of 4 years includes the preparation of hazardous material assessments, which include: Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Initial Site Assessments for the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and Preliminary Hazardous Material Assessments for sites located throughout California. APPENDIX D Basis of Design Report This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. Basis of Design Report Santa Ana River at Orangewood Avenue Bridge Crossing Anaheim, California Scour Analysis Prepared for: City of Anaheim And County of Orange Prepared by: Michael Baker International 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500, Santa Ana, CA 92707 (949) 472 -3505 Contact Person: Brad Losey , PE BKR JN 159416 March 2020 Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 General Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Study Objective ............................................................................................................................. 4 2 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Study Area Description ................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 6 2.3 Proposed Improvements ............................................................................................................ 10 3 Design Information ............................................................................................................................. 11 3.1 General Design Criteria ............................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Local Drainage Design ................................................................................................................. 11 3.3 Toe Protection Requirements ..................................................................................................... 11 3.3.1 General Scour ...................................................................................................................... 12 3.3.2 Bend Scour .......................................................................................................................... 13 3.3.3 Contraction or Abutment Scour .......................................................................................... 13 3.3.4 Bed Form Scour ................................................................................................................... 13 3.3.5 Low Flow Channel Incisement ............................................................................................ 13 3.3.6 Local Pier Scour ................................................................................................................... 14 3.3.7 Long-term Scour .................................................................................................................. 14 3.3.8 Summary of Channel Toe-down Requirements .................................................................. 14 3.4 Scour Countermeasures .............................................................................................................. 15 4 Design Hydraulics ................................................................................................................................ 16 4.1 Hydraulic Criteria ........................................................................................................................ 16 4.2 Local Drainage Improvements .................................................................................................... 16 4.3 Channel Freeboard Criteria ......................................................................................................... 16 4.4 Results of HEC-RAS Channel Hydraulic Analysis ......................................................................... 16 5. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................... 19 Technical Appendix Technical Appendix A Bridge Widening Concept Technical Appendix B Scour Analysis General Scour Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 Local Scour Technical Appendix C HEC-RAS Analysis Existing Condition Proposed Condition Technical Appendix D Local Drainage Hydrology and Inlet Capacity Technical Appendix E Local Drainage Hydraulic Calculation Existing 48” RCP at Full Flow Proposed System Hydraulics Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 1 Introduction 1.1 General Introduction The purpose of this report is to document the widening of the Orangewood Avenue Bridge (55C0050) over the Santa Ana River (E01). The portion of the channel affected by the Orangewood Avenue Widening Project is located in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California. Figure 1 shows a vicinity map of the project site. The 100-year discharges were previously established in the Army Corps of Engineers provided HEC-RAS hydraulic model. The HEC-RAS hydraulic model was used in order to conduct the analysis of the potential impacts the Orangewood Avenue Widening Project may have on the Santa Ana River hydraulics. The widening of Orangewood Avenue and the Santa Ana River Bridge will provide expanded bicycle and pedestrian access throughout the Platinum Triangle corridor. In general, the project will incorporate an additional lane from south of the SR-57 overcrossing through the Orangewood Avenue Interchange and across the Santa Ana River Bridge. Improvements within the SR-57 interchange will include a standard type 1 Caltrans retaining wall (8’ maximum height) and roadway widening. The existing five lane bridge is planned to be widened by between 30 to 35 feet to carry 6 lanes of traffic with sidewalks on each side. The total length of bridge is 348’-6” consisting of seven spans with a 20 degree skew. The existing structure was built in 1966 and widened in 1981 on the south side. The superstructure is reinforced concrete T-beam girders continuous over pier. The substructure consists of concrete pier walls and diaphragm type abutments all supported with concrete driven piles. 1.1 Study Objective The purpose of the project is to widen the Orangewood Avenue Bridge (55C0050) over the Santa Ana River. The roadway widening will increase the bridge width between 30 to 35 feet on the north side. The bridge widening concept is shown in Technical Appendix A. The channel crossing is located between State College Boulevard and Main Street, southeast of the Anaheim Stadium. This report has identified the following key objectives in developing a comprehensive technical analysis of the hydraulics associated with the Orangewood Avenue crossing of the Santa Ana River. These objectives include the following: • Perform supporting water surface profile hydraulic analysis of the Santa Ana River – Orangewood Avenue crossing to verify that the minimum freeboard requirements and flood protection levels are provided which are consistent with local and federal jurisdiction requirements. Water surface profiles will examine 100-year conditions. • Provide evaluation for the total scour depths including long-term, general, and local pier scour based upon the application of standard design criteria for alluvial channels. • Provide evaluation for Bridge pile scour protection measures. • Provide evaluation of local drainage improvements. Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 2 Background 2.1 Study Area Description The project is located in the City of Orange, Orange County, California within the Santa Ana River watershed. The mean annual precipitation in Orange is 13.4 inches. The area surrounding the project is primarily fully developed with residential housing, existing streets, industrial/commercial buildings, and a sport stadium. The area is located within the coastal and alluvial plains, ranging from sea level and rising to about 400 feet of elevation. The drainage pattern within Orangewood Avenue generally slopes away from the median towards the outside lanes where the flows are collected in drainage systems and conveyed into the Santa Ana River. The Santa Ana River (E01) begins at the San Bernardino Mountains and traverses past the counties of San Bernardino and Riverside before flowing into the Prado Dam and Santa Ana Mountains. The river is approximately 96 miles long and drains a watershed of 2,650 square miles. From the origin, the river flows southwest generally via earthen lining until it passes the Santa Ana Mountains. It then flows via a channel with grouted riprap and filter stone lined walls with an earthen bottom channel with various heights and widths and traverses through Orange County and drains into the Pacific Ocean. The existing channel, within the limits of the project, is a trapezoidal channel with grouted riprap and filter stone lined walls and earthen bottom. 2.2 Existing Conditions The Orangewood Avenue Bridge (55C0050) was built in 1966, widened in 1981, and is a seven span continuous reinforced concrete “T” beam supported by reinforced concrete pier walls with open end reinforced concrete diaphragm abutments, all on concrete piles. The roadway supported by the bridge is 5 lanes wide and spans approximately 71 feet. The bridge crosses the Santa Ana River at an approximate skew of 19°59’18”. Photos 1 and 2 show the Orangewood Avenue Bridge. Photos 3 and 4 show the typical pier supporting the structure. The top width of the channel ranges from 331 feet to 317 feet due to the abutments of the Orangewood Avenue Bridge, causing a reduction in the channel width. The channel widens back to 331 feet downstream of the bridge. The channel bottom is earthen and comprised mostly of fine alluvial material, shown in Photos 5 and 6. The banks of the channel are lined with grouted riprap and filter stone. There is a grade stabilizer at Station 667+00 of the Santa Ana River, approximately 150 feet downstream of the Orangewood Avenue Bridge, shown in Photo 6. The average slope of the channel for 2,000 feet downstream of the Orangewood Avenue Bridge is 0.0019 foot/foot. The average slope of the channel for 1,000 feet upstream of the Orangewood Avenue Bridge is 0.0073 foot/foot. The side slope of the channel in the project area is typically 2:1. Bike trails and bridge abutments within the channel at the Orangewood Avenue Bridge crossing cause a reduction in channel width at this location. Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 Photograph 1 – Orangewood Avenue Bridge Crossing Santa Ana River (Facing North). Note Bike Trails in the Channel. Photograph 2 – Orangewood Avenue Bridge Crossing Santa Ana River (Facing West) Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 Photograph 3 – Orangewood Avenue Bridge Piers (Facing Upstream from Downstream End) Photograph 4 – Orangewood Avenue Bridge Piers (Facing Downstream from Upstream End) Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 Photograph 5 – Santa Ana River Channel Lining (Facing Upstream) Photograph 6 – Santa Ana River Earthen Channel. Location of Grade Control Structure (buried). Note fine alluvial material. Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 2.3 Proposed Improvements The roadway widening will increase the bridge width between 30 to 35 feet on the north side of the Orangewood Avenue Bridge. The abutments and piers will be extended, along with a realignment of the bike trail on the west side of the Santa Ana River. The bridge alignment in relation to the channel will remain skewed 19°59’18”. The bridge pier alignment will also remain the same. The hydraulic impacts to the channel are a result of extending of the abutments and piers and realignment of the bike trail. The proposed bridge widening concept is shown in Technical Appendix A. The existing bridge piles are limited in depth by the underlaying soils. The proposed piles are anticipated to encounter refusal at a similar depth to the existing piles, and the proposed widening is required to have a similar seismic response to the existing bridge. The proposed bridge piles are designed to be driven to the same tip elevation as the existing bridge piles. The bridge has been evaluated for scour and deemed to be scour vulnerable at these pile depths. Scour countermeasure are proposed to protect the existing and proposed bridge foundations. The scour countermeasure is disused in Section 3.4. Improvements to the local drainage systems are proposed to capture flow from the widened bridge and roadway improvements and convey local drainage flow to the Santa Ana River. The existing 48” RCP that runs adjacent to the westbound Orangewood Avenue lanes will be realigned north of the proposed retaining wall. A lateral to the 48” storm drain will connect to two (2) grate inlets to capture surface runoff from the proposed improvements. Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 3 Design Information 3.1 General Design Criteria The Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) is the local agency responsible for the regional flood control facility, Santa Ana River. The requirement and goal of OCFCD includes design of regional flood control improvements to provide 100-year protection for residences and other non-floodproof structures pursuant to the Public Services and Facilities Element of the General Plan. The federal government, through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), has also developed minimum guidelines for the regulation of development in the floodplain. These regulations ensure developments are provided a minimum of a 100-year level of flood protection. The FEMA criteria represents a minimum guideline for flood protection, however, the local governing agencies may enforce more stringent requirements related to flood protection. The design criteria for the channel set forth by OCFCD is to maintain a minimum freeboard of 1.5-ft with a 100-year flowrate in a non-leveed channel. The 100-year flowrate in the Santa Ana River is 42,000 cubic feet per second (cfs). The freeboard represents the height above the maximum calculated design water surface elevation to the top of revetment or bridge low-chord elevation. The design channel heights evaluated the 100-year flowrate conditions and applied the minimum freeboard requirement of 1.5-ft to the section of the channel within the Orangewood Improvement Project area. 3.2 Local Drainage Design Local drainage features will be designed to meet the requirements of the Orange County Local Drainage Manual. Inlets, junctions and transition structures will be designed using City of Orange Standard Plans. 3.3 Toe Protection Requirements The primary failure mechanism of rigid bank protection revetments for channel systems is generally due to scouring under the toe of the revetment. Scour is the removal of material along the channel as a result of hydraulic forces. The design of the channel slope protection must provide adequate toe-down protection below the earthen channel invert to account for dynamic changes in the streambed elevations during the passage of a storm hydrograph. The toe-down depth must consider the potential of general bed degradation, bend scour (for curved portions of the channel’s horizontal alignment), bed form height, abutment or contraction scour, and local scour associated with hydraulic structures such as bridge piers. Local scour needs to be considered in addition to development of the potential long-term equilibrium channel slope or invert elevation that may develop from general degradation and sediment deposition. The following methodology was used for determination of scour. The maximum scour depths for toe protection were calculated for the 100-year flood in the vicinity of the bridge. Toe down depths for the channel slope protection will consist of general or natural scour in the channel as calculated by the Blench and Modified Lacey regime equations plus adjustments for local scour. Unless stated otherwise, scour depth will be defined as the depth of scour below the minimum channel bed elevation. The bed elevations are taken from the HEC-RAS model provided by the Army Corps of Engineers. In this report the requirements for toe-down is the total cumulative channel adjustments possible from long-term degradation, general scour, bend scour, contraction scour, local scour, low-flow incisement, and bed forms. Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 𝑍𝑆𝑙𝑟𝑎𝑙=𝑍𝐹𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑙+𝑍𝐵𝑎𝑙𝑎+𝑍𝐵𝑙𝑙𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑙𝑙+𝑍𝐵𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑙𝑟𝑙+𝑍𝐿𝑙𝑤 𝐹𝑙𝑙𝑤 𝐼𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑙𝑟+𝑍𝐿𝑙𝑎𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑟𝑟 +𝑍𝐿𝑙𝑙𝑎−𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑙 𝐵𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑙𝑙 The toe-down requirements are applicable to the channel side slopes/crossing slope protection, as well as the channelization facilities. A scour protection structure was constructed downstream of the Orangewood Avenue Bridge to eliminate long-term degradation. Any new channel bank revetment will be designed to provide 100-year flood protection. The project proposes to widen the Orangewood Avenue Bridge, extend the piers and abutments of the bridge, and reconstruct the bike paths. The proposed improvements will change the channel configuration and a hydraulic model was created to show the change in water surface elevation in the affected areas. The hydraulic model for the Santa Ana River and calculations for the scour depth are included in Technical Appendix B. 3.3.1 General Scour General scour is the lowering of the streambed across the channel or stream over a relatively short time period such as the passage of a single flood event. It may result from contraction of the flow when the flow area of a stream is decreased from the normal, either by a natural constriction or a manmade constriction. With the decrease in flow area there is an increase in average velocity and bed shear stress. General scour is best eliminated by conducting a detailed sediment transport analysis, which is beyond the scope of the project. General scour was calculated using the Blench Regime and Modified Lacey Equation. Using results of a sediment sample taken from the channel invert in the vicinity of the bridge, a D50 grain size of 1.396 mm was used for the analysis. The grain size analysis results are shown in Technical Appendix B. The Blench Regime Equation is as follows: 𝑑𝑎0 =( 𝑞𝑎 2 𝐹𝑎0 ) 1 3 Where: • 𝑑𝑎0 = regime depth for zero bed change [scour depth below the design water surface, (ft)] • 𝑞𝑎= unit discharge (design discharge/channel topwidth), (ft2/s) • 𝐹𝑎0 = zero-bed factor (function of median bed material size; a D50 of 1.396 mm was used) The scour depth is estimated using the following equation: 𝑑𝑟=𝑍× 𝑑𝑎0 Where: • 𝑑𝑟= maximum scoured depth below the design channel invert (ft) • 𝑍= factor to account for straight reaches or bends in channel (Z = 0.6 for generally straight sections) The Modified Lacey Equation is as follows: 𝑦𝐿=0.47 (𝑄 𝑓) 0.33 Where: • 𝑦𝐿= mean depth at design discharge (ft) Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 • 𝑄= design discharge (ft3/s) • 𝑓= Lacey’s silt factor (a D50 of 1.396 mm was used) 𝑓=1.76𝐷50 0.5 The Blench Regime and Modified Lacey Equation determines the scour depth below the water surface elevation. Using the Blench Regime Equation, a general scour of 12.1-ft below the channel invert at the bridge crossing was calculated. Using the Modified Lacey Equation, a general scour of 12.4-ft below the channel invert at the bridge crossing was calculated. These scour depths were calculated using the 100- year hydraulic parameters from the proposed bridge HEC-RAS model of the Santa Ana River. The general scour calculations can be found in Technical Appendix B. 3.3.2 Bend Scour Bend scour occurs due to the transverse or secondary currents which develop as the flow is forced to change direction through impingement on the channel bank. Scour takes place along the outside of a bend and deposits along the inside of the bend. This scour mechanism is caused by the spiral pattern of secondary currents, it is not due to a shift of the maximum longitudinal velocity against the outer bank. The reach of channel in the vicinity of the bridge is generally straight, therefore, bend scour is not expected to occur. 3.3.3 Contraction or Abutment Scour Contraction or abutment scour results from reduction of the natural floodplain width and the decreased flow area of the contraction channel section due to the channelization. With a decrease in flow area, there is an increase in average velocity and bed shear stress through the contraction. The abutment scour occurs in the stream bed upstream areas of reduced stream width or contraction areas. The increase in transport of bed material from the channel will lower the streambed elevation. Contraction and abutment scour is expected to affect the channel, however, the hydraulic model that was created for the proposed condition of the Santa Ana River accounts for the contraction and abutment scour. Therefore, the contraction and abutment scour is applied through the general scour calculations. 3.3.4 Bed Form Scour Bed forms usually develop in sand bed channels and create a succession of crest and troughs in a sinusoidal pattern along the channel be depending upon the flow conditions. The potential exists for the creation of antidunes within an alluvial channel when the Froude number of the design flow is near or greater than 1.0, i.e. supercritical flow regime. Dunes may form in the lower regime for Froude numbers less than one. Bed form depth below the original bed may range from 10% to 50% of the flow depth. The reach of the channel in the vicinity of the bridge has a Froude number of generally less than 0.6, therefore, bed form scour is not expected to occur. 3.3.5 Low Flow Channel Incisement When large width to depth ratios exists, consideration should be given to the development of a low flow channel. A channel formed predominantly by a 5-year to 10-year flood will develop width and depth characteristics to carry this relatively large discharge in a hydraulically efficient manner; however, for smaller floods, these channel dimensions may result in a flow pattern approaching sheet flow conditions. Rather than carrying the flow in this manner, the channel will develop a low-flow channel that provides more efficient conveyance of the low-flow discharges. The development of a low-flow channel will create entirely different hydraulic conditions than those occurring in the original channel geometry and may create bank instability from incisement. The design storms for toe down Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 determination are the 100-year and the SPF storm depending on the proximity of the bridge. Due to the continual routine maintenance of the soft bottom of the Santa Ana River for groundwater recharge, the low flow incisement in the channel was considered negligible. 3.3.6 Local Pier Scour Local pier scour occurs at piers and is a function of bed material characteristics, bed configuration, flow characteristics, fluid properties, and the geometry of the pier and footing. The bed material characteristics are granular or non-granular, cohesive or non-cohesive, erodible or non-erodible rock. Granular bed material ranges in size from silt to large boulders and is characterized by the D50 and a coarse size such as the D84 or D90 size. Cohesive bed material is composed of silt and clay. Flow characteristics of interest for local pier scour are the velocity and depth, upstream of the pier, and the angle of the flow relative to the pier. Pier geometry characteristics consider its type, dimensions, and shape. The type of piers in this section of the channel are complex piers which include the pier, footing or pile cap, and piles. A complex pier scour analysis was performed in order to accurately identify the total local pier scour at the piers by using the HEC-18 complex local pier scour equations. The HEC-18 complex local pier scour equations are as follows: 𝑦𝑟 𝑦1 =2.0𝐾1𝐾2 𝐾3(𝑍 𝑦1 )0.65𝐹𝑞1 0.43 • 𝑦𝑟= scour depth • 𝑦1 = flow depth directly upstream of the pier • 𝐾1 = correction factor for pier nose shape • 𝐾2 = correction factor for angle of attack of the flow • 𝐾3 = correction factor for bed condition • 𝑍= width of structure (pile, pier, pile cap) • 𝐹𝑞= Froude number directly upstream of the pier Case 2 was used to account for the calculated depth of scour being below the pile cap. Case 1 considers the depth of scour being at or above the pile cap. The total complex local pier scour was determined to be 10.54-ft. The complex local pier scour calculations can be found in Technical Appendix B. 3.3.7 Long-term Scour Long term degradation or scour are a result of the channel tending towards an equilibrium slope. Modifications to the channel can affect the long term trends. Approximately 150 feet downstream of the bridge, there is a grade control structure. The purpose of the grade control structure is to eliminate long-term scour in the portion of the channel directly upstream of it. A long-term scour analysis was not performed due to the presence of the grade control structure just downstream of the bridge. 3.3.8 Summary of Channel Toe-down Requirements The channel side slope toe-down requirements were evaluated for the 100-year discharges. The toe down requirements were evaluated for a range of design conditions based upon the results of the HEC- RAS models. The design conditions represent the maximum range of anticipated design operation and variation of variables. The hydraulic characteristics indicated in the HEC-RAS models were utilized based upon the criteria previously indicated to develop the maximum toe-down depth requirements. Because a grade control structure is located just downstream of the bridge, no long-term scour is expected to occur. As previously discussed, general and local pier scour were used to determine total scour depth for the slope protection toe-down. The results of the toe-down analysis show that the maximum Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 anticipated depth of scour to be approximately 22.9-ft in the vicinity of the bridge. The bridge widening is not expected to alter the existing condition scour. 3.4 Scour Countermeasures Contech Armorflex® articulated concrete block (ACB) scour countermeasures to local scour are proposed from a minimum of 36 feet upstream of the eastern most Bridge debris nose to the adjacent grade control structure downstream of the Bridge. The scour countermeasures are placed a minimum of two (2) feet below the channel invert to protect the bridge foundation from general and local scour. At the upstream edge the ACB will toe down 16 feet total—the sum of 12 feet to protect from the calculated general scour depth and four (4) feet additional toe down for increased safety. ACB will extend to meet the existing channel wall and grade control structure then toe down at a 2:1 (h:v) feet where they meet. The space between the ACB toe down and channel wall, grade control structure or bridge pier wall will be filled with grout. Figure 2: Contech ArmorFlex and A-Jacks Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 4 Design Hydraulics 4.1 Hydraulic Criteria The hydraulics of the Santa Ana River were analyzed using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-RAS water surface profile model. The existing condition hydraulics model was obtained from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The model was modified to analyze the proposed improvements to the Orangewood Avenue Bridge and Santa Ana River Bike Trail to ensure that the criteria for required level of flood protection is achieved. HEC-RAS is a one dimensional, rigid boundary model which assumes that the channel bed does not move. The HEC-RAS program is used for calculating water surface profile for steady and gradually varied flow in natural and manmade channels. The effects of obstacles such as bridges, culvert, and road crossings can be modeled in the computations. 4.2 Local Drainage Improvements The proposed alignment of the 48” RCP along Orangewood Ave was analyzed in WSPG to ensure that the drainage system has capacity for the existing system at full flow. Lateral I was also analyzed in WSPG to ensure it has capacity for the local runoff in its tributary area. CALTRANS standard GT1 inlets were placed to capture surface flow. These systems are all shown to be in inlet control. 4.3 Channel Freeboard Criteria The OCFCD Design Manual minimum freeboard criteria was used to ensure flood protection levels were satisfied. The minimum freeboard requirement for this reach of the Santa Ana River is 1.5-ft. Freeboard, per Addendum 3 of the OCFCD Design Manual. The channel freeboard is defined as the vertical distance from the top lining of the channel to the water surface elevation. 4.4 Results of HEC-RAS Channel Hydraulic Analysis Results of the HEC-RAS analysis for the existing and proposed condition at the Orangewood Avenue Bridge are summarized in Table 1 below. The channel hydraulics were prepared using the HEC-RAS water surface profile model and modifying the cross sections based on the proposed improvements of the project. The proposed improvements for the Orangewood Avenue Bridge is to widen the bridge by approximately 40-ft. The proposed improvements for the Orangewood Avenue Bridge will require the abutments and piers to be extended. The extension of the abutments will require the Santa Ana Bike Trail to be realigned. These adjustments are within the channel lining and are reflected in the proposed hydraulic model. The hydraulic model results for the existing and proposed condition can be found in Technical Appendix C. A comparison of the channel hydraulics for the existing and proposed conditions in the vicinity of the bridge is shown in Table 2. The elevation at the top of the channel is 147.87-ft at the upstream and 147.80-ft at the downstream Orangewood Avenue Bridge Soffit. The proposed freeboard meets the 1.5-ft minimum criteria per Addendum 3 of the OCFCD Design Manual. Table 1 – Santa Ana River at Orangewood Avenue Bridge Water Surface Elevation Summary Channel Description Existing Channel Station Proposed Channel Station Existing Water Surface Elevation Proposed Water Surface Elevation Change in Water Surface Elevation Existing Freeboard Proposed Freeboard Upstream Orangewood 669+22 669+62 145.28 145.44 0.16 2.59 2.43 Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 Avenue Bridge Soffit Downstream Orangewood Avenue Bridge Soffit 668+47 668+47 144.37 144.37 0 3.43 3.43 Table 2 – Santa Ana River at Orangewood Avenue Bridge Water Surface Elevation Summary Channel Station Existing Water Surface Elevation Proposed Water Surface Elevation Change in Water Surface Elevation 689+73 141.31 141.31 0 689+71. 149.8 149.84 0.04 689+69 150.02 150.06 0.04 689+64.3 150.01 150.05 0.04 689+59.6 149.99 150.03 0.04 689+54.9 149.98 150.02 0.04 689+50.2 149.96 150 0.04 689+45.5 149.95 149.99 0.04 689+40.8 149.94 149.98 0.04 689+36.1 149.92 149.96 0.04 689+31.4 149.91 149.95 0.04 689+26.7 149.89 149.93 0.04 689+22 149.88 149.92 0.04 689+16 149.44 149.49 0.05 688+08 149.09 149.14 0.05 687+00 148.87 148.93 0.06 685+47.5 148.67 148.72 0.05 683+95 148.47 148.53 0.06 682+26 SR-57 Bridge 680+50 147.1 147.2 0.1 678+66.6 146.75 146.86 0.11 676+83.3 146.39 146.52 0.13 675+00 146.03 146.18 0.15 673+33.3 145.9 146.05 0.15 671+66.6 145.79 145.96 0.17 670+00 145.72 145.89 0.17 Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 669+62 145.28 145.44 0.16 668+85 Orangewood Avenue Bridge 668+47 144.37 144.37 0 667+23.5 143.96 143.96 0 666+00 143.68 143.68 0 Basis of Design Report: Orangewood Avenue Bridge Improvement Project Project Number: 159416 March 2020 5. Conclusion Based on the analysis of the existing and proposed condition, the proposed bridge widening increases the water surface elevation within the limits of the project. The proposed improvements increase the water surface elevation upstream of the Orangewood Avenue Bridge by a maximum of 0.17-ft. This is due to the new alignment of the bike trail and the abutment and pier extensions. The freeboard in the channel still meets the minimum 1.5-ft criteria per Addendum 3 of the OCFCD Design Manual. The general and local pier scour resulted in a 22.9-ft total scour. Scour protection measures are proposed at the bridge piers and pilings. The design of the bridge piers accounts for the total scour potential. TECHNICAL APPENDIX A BRIDGE WIDENING CONCEPT TECHNICAL APPENDIX B SCOUR ANALYSIS General Scour Local Scour Medium FineBoring SampleNumber NumberB-2S-1 0SPRemarkProject No. :Date :04/12/17Figure No. :U.S.C.S.MBI, Orangewood Avenue Improvement Project, AnaheimGRAIN SIZE ANALYSISUS Standard Sieve Sizes Hydrometer Analysis CobblesGravel SandSilt or Clay Coarse FineSymbolDepthSoil ColorSoil Description ( ft ) ( m ) (ASTM D-422)17-126dark olive-brownPoorly graded sand with gravel-10.00.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.090.0100.00.0010.010.11101001000Percent Finer By Weight (%)Grain Size (mm)3"1"2" 3/8"3/4" #4#16#10#20 #30#60#100#2001/2"2.5" 1.5"4"#8 #40 #505"6"Coarse River Reach River Sta Q Total Min Ch El W.S. Elev Vel Chnl Flow Area Top Widthds(cfs)(ft)(ft)(ft/s)(sq ft)(ft)(ft)SARUpper Reach6805042000134.1147.210.693928.16329.6512.16SARUpper Reach67866.642000133.73146.8610.743911.61325.6412.26SARUpper Reach67683.342000133.37146.5210.83890.49321.7412.36SARUpper Reach6750042000133146.1810.843875.3317.9812.46SARUpper Reach67333.342000132.62146.0510.24118.87339.1611.93SARUpper Reach67166.642000132.24145.969.524413.5360.4311.46SARUpper Reach6700042000131.86145.898.834758.85383.5910.99SARUpper Reach6696242000131.86145.449.934231.54330.8312.13SARUpper Reach6684742000131.6144.3710.633950.28332.612.09SARUpper Reach66723.542000131.3143.9611.113781.79331.0812.13SARUpper Reach6660042000131143.6811.193754.99322.312.34SARUpper Reach66433.342000130.67143.3411.213746.34321.3112.37SARUpper Reach66266.642000130.3314311.233741.18320.3912.39SARUpper Reach6610042000130142.6611.253732.38319.4612.42SARUpper Reach65933.342000129.67142.3411.233740.32320.5712.39SARUpper Reach65766.642000129.33142.0111.193753.03321.7712.36SARUpper Reach6560042000129141.6911.163762.82323.0112.33SARUpper Reach6542542000128.73141.3111.253734.2323.6112.31SARUpper Reach6525042000128.45140.9211.343704.23324.1112.30SARUpper Reach6507542000128.18140.4911.473660.15324.4312.291.950.6Z = factor to account for straight reaches or bends in channel (Z=0.6 for generally straight channel sections)Blench Regimedf0 = regime depth for zero bed change (scour depth below the design water surface) (ft)qf = unit discharge (design discharge/channel topwidth) (ft2/sec)Fb0 = zero-bed factor (function of median bed material size; a D50 of 1.396 mm was used) = ds = maximum scoured depth below the design channel invert (ft)= ()=× Bank Stabilization Design Guidelines Figure 12–3. Graph to Estimate Blench Zero Bed Factor (Pemberton and Lara, 1984). 206 River Reach River Sta Q Total Min Ch El W.S. Elev Vel Chnl Flow Area Top WidthyL(cfs)(ft)(ft)(ft/s)(sq ft)(ft)(ft)SARUpper Reach6805042000134.1147.210.693928.16329.6512.36SARUpper Reach67866.642000133.73146.8610.743911.61325.6412.36SARUpper Reach67683.342000133.37146.5210.83890.49321.7412.36SARUpper Reach6750042000133146.1810.843875.3317.9812.36SARUpper Reach67333.342000132.62146.0510.24118.87339.1612.36SARUpper Reach67166.642000132.24145.969.524413.5360.4312.36SARUpper Reach6700042000131.86145.898.834758.85383.5912.36SARUpper Reach6696242000131.86145.449.934231.54330.8312.36SARUpper Reach6684742000131.6144.3710.633950.28332.612.36SARUpper Reach66723.542000131.3143.9611.113781.79331.0812.36SARUpper Reach6660042000131143.6811.193754.99322.312.36SARUpper Reach66433.342000130.67143.3411.213746.34321.3112.36SARUpper Reach66266.642000130.3314311.233741.18320.3912.36SARUpper Reach6610042000130142.6611.253732.38319.4612.36SARUpper Reach65933.342000129.67142.3411.233740.32320.5712.36SARUpper Reach65766.642000129.33142.0111.193753.03321.7712.36SARUpper Reach6560042000129141.6911.163762.82323.0112.36SARUpper Reach6542542000128.73141.3111.253734.2323.6112.36SARUpper Reach6525042000128.45140.9211.343704.23324.1112.36SARUpper Reach6507542000128.18140.4911.473660.15324.4312.362.09Modified LaceyyL = mean depth at design discharge (ft)Q = design dicharge (ft3/s)f = Lacey's silt factor (a D50 of 1.396 mm was used) = =1.76.= 0.47(). Reference: HEC -18 Evaluating Scour at Bridges 5th ED (Chapt. 7) Legend: Input Values:Calculated Values: Angle of Attach deg) =0 y1 = 14.03 ft K1 =1 VC =2.60 V1 =8.83 ft/s K2 =1.00 a = 1.5 ft K3 =1.1 Fr =0.42 L=1.5 Scour for Complex Pier Foundations # of Piers 1 D50 (mm) =1.396 Ku =1 y1 = 14.03 uc* =0.1436 Vc =2.60 f= (Footing Width - Pier Width)/2 f =2.45 ft S =4 ft V1 =8.83 h0 =0 ft T =2 ft V2 =8.77 h1 =2 y1 =14.03 V3 =7.65 h2 =0.09 y2 =14.12 h3 =2.15 y3 =16.18 d50 =0.00458 ft d84 =0.01237 ft Determine Pier Stem Scour Depth Component h1/apier =1.33 f/apier = 1.63 Kh pier from Figure 7.6 = 0.04 ys pier = 0.18 Determine Pile Cap (Footing) Scour Depth Component K1 =1.1 K2 =1 K3 =1.1 Determine whether Case 1 or Case 2: Case 1: Bottom of Pile Cap (Footing) in Flow above the Bed Case 2: Bottom of Pile Cap (Footing) Located On or Below the Bed Choose Case to use:Case 2 apc = 7 ft T/y2 = 0.14 h2/y2 = 0.01 Check y2 max = 3.5apc = 24.50 a*pc/a pc per Figure 7.7 = 0.14 For skewed flow use the L/a for the original pile cap as the L/a for the equivalent Pier to determine K2. Apply the wide pier correction factor, Kw, if (1) the total depth, y2 < 0.8 a* pc, (2) the Froude Number < 1, and (3) a* pc > 50 d50 Wide Pier Check: y2 = 14.12 0.8 a* pc = 0.79 y2 > 0.8 a* pc Kw =1 Fr =0.42 Fr <1 OK a*pc = 0.98 50 d50 = 0.229 a*pc > 50 d50 OK Kw = 1 yspc =4.13 ft Case 1 An inherent assumption in Case 2 is that the footing is deeper than the expected scour depth so it is not necessary to add the pile group scour as a third component of the Total Scour. Yf = 2.09 Bed material is sand Ks = 0.0124 Vf = 7.00 The wide pier factor Kw should be used if (1) Total depth y2 < 0.8 apc, (2) the Froude Number <1, and (3) apc > 50 D50. Use y2/apc to compute Kw. Wide Pier Check: y2 = 14.12 0.8 a pc = 5.60 y2 > 0.8 a pc Kw =1 Fr =0.42 Fr <1 OK apc = 7 50 d50 = 0.229 apc > 50 d50 OK Kw =1 ys pc = 10.36 ys =10.54 ft Case 2 Only Determine Pile Group Scour Depth Component Effective width of an equivalent full depth pier Pile Width, a =1.25 ft K1 =1 K3 =1.1 aproj =3.75 Adjusted Flow Depth and Velocity S/a = 3.20 aproj/a = 3 Ksp =0.55 y3 = 16.18 h3 = 2.15 h3/y3 = 0.24 Km = 1.21 Number of Rows in Flow Direction, m =3 Use m =3 a*pg = 2.52 Kh pg = 0.35 Check y3 max = 3.5a*pg = 8.83 Pile Group Scour, Ys pg =2.35 ft Total Pier Scour, ys =10.54 ft Case 2 TECHNICAL APPENDIX C HEC-RAS – Hydraulic Summary Existing Condition Proposed Condition EXISTING CONDITIONReachRiver StaProfileQ TotalMin Ch ElW.S. ElevCrit W.S.E.G. ElevE.G. SlopeVel ChnlFlow AreaTop WidthFroude # Chl(cfs)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft/ft)(ft/s)(sq ft)(ft) Upper Reach68977.* GDM Event42000139.7145.48148.62155.990.02864226.011614.62289.141.94Upper Reach68975.* GDM Event42000138143.37146.95155.740.03685328.231487.96282.642.17Upper Reach68973.* GDM Event42000136.3141.31145.26155.480.0454930.211390.33277.52.38Upper Reach68971.* GDM Event42000134.6149.8143.55151.230.001199.64373.41310.680.45Upper Reach68969GDM Event42000132.8150.02141.7151.130.0022078.454970.03312.730.37Upper Reach68964.3*GDM Event42000132.8150.01141.71151.120.0022178.474960.16312.710.37Upper Reach68959.6*GDM Event42000132.8149.99141.76151.110.0022258.484950.6312.660.38Upper Reach68954.9*GDM Event42000132.8149.98141.79151.10.0022348.54941.36312.590.38Upper Reach68950.2*GDM Event42000132.8149.96141.81151.090.0022418.524932.42312.490.38Upper Reach68945.5*GDM Event42000132.8149.95141.81151.080.0022488.534923.76312.370.38Upper Reach68940.8*GDM Event42000132.8149.94141.86151.070.0022548.544915.38312.220.38Upper Reach68936.1*GDM Event42000132.8149.92141.87151.060.002268.564907.26312.050.38Upper Reach68931.4*GDM Event42000132.8149.91141.9151.050.0022668.574899.41311.850.38Upper Reach68926.7*GDM Event42000132.8149.89141.91151.040.002278.594891.81311.640.38Upper Reach68922GDM Event42000132.8149.88141.91151.030.0022758.64884.29311.410.38Upper Reach68916GDM Event42000135.73149.44144.51150.970.0040229.924235.55345.930.5Upper Reach68808.* GDM Event42000135.51149.09144.35150.710.00154110.214114.05336.510.51Upper Reach68700GDM Event42000135.3148.87144.17150.540.00156610.364054.25327.450.52Upper Reach68547.5*GDM Event42000134.95148.67143.82150.290.00151110.234106.85329.410.51Upper Reach68395GDM Event42000134.6148.47143.46150.050.00144710.084166.99330.690.5Upper Reach68226BridgeUpper Reach68050GDM Event42000134.1147.1142.96148.910.00179610.783895.67329.20.55Upper Reach67866.6*GDM Event42000133.73146.75142.61148.570.00180310.843874.13325.150.55Upper Reach67683.3*GDM Event42000133.37146.39142.26148.240.00181610.913849.03321.230.56Upper Reach67500GDM Event42000133146.03141.89147.90.00182510.973827.93317.440.56Upper Reach67333.3*GDM Event42000132.62145.9141.38147.550.00161510.334065.21338.250.53Upper Reach67166.6*GDM Event42000132.24145.79140.93147.240.0013959.654353.77359.780.49Upper Reach67000GDM Event42000131.86145.72140.37146.960.0011828.954693.03382.90.45Upper Reach66922GDM Event42000131.8145.28140.37146.830.00145910.014196.71330.660.5Upper Reach66885BridgeUpper Reach66847GDM Event42000131.6144.37140.27146.120.00178510.633950.05332.60.54 Upper Reach66723.5*GDM Event42000131.3143.96140.18145.870.00201511.113781.59331.080.58Upper Reach66600GDM Event42000131143.68139.88145.620.00197811.193754.78322.30.58Upper Reach66433.3*GDM Event42000130.67143.34139.55145.290.00198611.213746.11321.30.58Upper Reach66266.6*GDM Event42000130.33143139.21144.960.00198811.233740.92320.390.58Upper Reach66100GDM Event42000130142.66138.88144.630.00199711.253732.09319.450.58Upper Reach65933.3*GDM Event42000129.67142.34138.55144.290.00199111.233739.98320.570.58Upper Reach65766.6*GDM Event42000129.33142.01138.2143.960.00197811.193752.65321.770.58Upper Reach65600GDM Event42000129141.69137.87143.620.0019711.163762.39323.010.58Upper Reach65425.* GDM Event42000128.73141.31137.6143.270.00202411.253733.7323.610.58Upper Reach65250.* GDM Event42000128.45140.92137.32142.910.00208311.343703.65324.110.59Upper Reach65075.* GDM Event42000128.18140.49137.05142.540.00216911.483659.48324.420.6Upper Reach64900GDM Event42000127.9140.04136.77142.140.0022711.633610.24324.640.61Upper Reach64734.3GDM Event42000127.34139.7136.22141.760.00217511.533643.55321.270.6 PROPOSED CONDITIONReachRiver StaProfileQ TotalMin Ch ElW.S. ElevCrit W.S.E.G. ElevE.G. SlopeVel ChnlFlow AreaTop WidthFroude # Chl(cfs)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft/ft)(ft/s)(sq ft)(ft) Upper Reach68977.* GDM Event42000139.7145.48148.62155.990.028613261615.12289.141.94Upper Reach68975.* GDM Event42000138143.37146.95155.740.03681528.221488.43282.642.17Upper Reach68973.* GDM Event42000136.3141.31145.26155.480.04544330.21390.77277.52.38Upper Reach68971.* GDM Event42000134.6149.84143.56151.270.001189.584386.04310.830.45Upper Reach68969GDM Event42000132.8150.06141.7151.170.0021918.434982.19312.870.37Upper Reach68964.3*GDM Event42000132.8150.05141.71151.160.00228.454972.36312.850.37Upper Reach68959.6*GDM Event42000132.8150.03141.76151.150.0022098.464962.84312.80.37Upper Reach68954.9*GDM Event42000132.8150.02141.79151.140.0022178.484953.64312.720.38Upper Reach68950.2*GDM Event42000132.8150141.81151.130.0022248.494944.73312.620.38Upper Reach68945.5*GDM Event42000132.8149.99141.81151.120.0022318.514936.1312.50.38Upper Reach68940.8*GDM Event42000132.8149.98141.86151.10.0022378.524927.75312.350.38Upper Reach68936.1*GDM Event42000132.8149.96141.87151.090.0022438.544919.66312.180.38Upper Reach68931.4*GDM Event42000132.8149.95141.9151.080.0022488.554911.84311.980.38Upper Reach68926.7*GDM Event42000132.8149.93141.91151.070.0022538.564904.27311.770.38Upper Reach68922GDM Event42000132.8149.92141.91151.060.0022578.584896.78311.530.38Upper Reach68916GDM Event42000135.73149.49144.52151.010.0039759.884251.52346.130.5Upper Reach68808.* GDM Event42000135.51149.14144.36150.750.00152210.174131.36336.920.51Upper Reach68700GDM Event42000135.3148.93144.17150.580.00154510.314071.87327.680.52Upper Reach68547.5*GDM Event42000134.95148.72143.82150.330.00149110.184125.72329.830.51Upper Reach68395GDM Event42000134.6148.53143.46150.10.00142510.034187.04330.950.5Upper Reach68226BridgeUpper Reach68050GDM Event42000134.1147.2142.96148.980.00175110.693928.16329.650.55Upper Reach67866.6*GDM Event42000133.73146.86142.62148.660.0017510.743911.61325.640.55Upper Reach67683.3*GDM Event42000133.37146.52142.26148.330.00175610.83890.49321.740.55Upper Reach67500GDM Event42000133146.18141.9148.010.00175610.843875.3317.980.55Upper Reach67333.3*GDM Event42000132.62146.05141.39147.670.00155210.24118.87339.160.52Upper Reach67166.6*GDM Event42000132.24145.96140.93147.370.0013379.524413.5360.430.48Upper Reach67000GDM Event42000131.86145.89140.37147.10.0011328.834758.85383.590.44Upper Reach66962GDM Event42000131.86145.44140.43146.970.0014219.934231.54330.830.49Upper Reach66885BridgeUpper Reach66847GDM Event42000131.6144.37140.27146.130.00178510.633950.28332.60.54 Upper Reach66723.5*GDM Event42000131.3143.96140.18145.880.00201511.113781.79331.080.58Upper Reach66600GDM Event42000131143.68139.88145.620.00197711.193754.99322.30.58Upper Reach66433.3*GDM Event42000130.67143.34139.55145.290.00198511.213746.34321.310.58Upper Reach66266.6*GDM Event42000130.33143139.21144.960.00198811.233741.18320.390.58Upper Reach66100GDM Event42000130142.66138.88144.630.00199711.253732.38319.460.58Upper Reach65933.3*GDM Event42000129.67142.34138.55144.30.00199111.233740.32320.570.58Upper Reach65766.6*GDM Event42000129.33142.01138.2143.960.00197711.193753.03321.770.58Upper Reach65600GDM Event42000129141.69137.87143.630.00196911.163762.82323.010.58Upper Reach65425.* GDM Event42000128.73141.31137.6143.280.00202311.253734.2323.610.58Upper Reach65250.* GDM Event42000128.45140.92137.32142.920.00208211.343704.23324.110.59Upper Reach65075.* GDM Event42000128.18140.49137.05142.540.00216811.473660.15324.430.6Upper Reach64900GDM Event42000127.9140.05136.78142.150.00226811.633611.06324.650.61Upper Reach64734.3GDM Event42000127.34139.7136.23141.770.00217411.523644.48321.280.6 TECHNICAL APPENDIX D Local Drainage Hydrology and Inlet Capacity 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500, Santa Ana, CA 92707 Phone: (949) 472-3505 · MBAKERINTL.COM 10Q (cfs)(ac)NO. A-1-1 A-2-1 0.38 0.55 2.55 1.55 SUBAREA AREA HYDROLOGY DATA c:\pwv8i-local\baker_projects\daniel.price\d0508294\159416-inlet calcs_workingdjp.xlsm PEAK FLOW RATE CALCULATIONS - GRATE INLETS Proposed COUNTY: ROUTE: PM LIMITS:D. Stone DATE:3/5/2020 n=0.016 10-year B. Losey DATE:3/5/2020 PAVED UNPAVED A-2-1 0.382 0.000 0.000 0%0.382 1.00 0.00 1.00 4.06 1.55 0.00 1.55 0.0420 0.0120 0.125 0.0833 2.0000 2.0000 1.467 0.082 0.947 0.121 10.00 5.18 0.50 0.38 2.12 GT1 Flow-by 1.57 6.40 4.27 0.62 100%67.1%1.35 0.19 NO A-1-1 0.554 0.000 0.000 0%0.554 1.00 0.00 1.00 4.06 2.25 0.00 2.25 0.0250 0.0140 0.108 0.0833 2.0000 2.0000 1.804 0.443 0.803 0.092 10.00 8.01 0.50 0.37 2.32 GT1 Flow-by 1.57 6.40 4.27 0.44 100%50.8%1.63 0.62 NO INLET DATA:FORMULAS:HEC-22 Equation Number 1. Grate inlets only HYDROLOGY: Q=CIA/Ku 3-1 2. Clogging Factors(applied to width of grate): flowby = 33%FLOODED WIDTH: T=[Qn/(0.56Sx 1.67S0.5)]0.375 4-2 sump = 50%MODIFIED FLOODED WIDTH:T=0.85d/SX 4-3 3. Grates are P-50 =>Rf=1.0 (for other grates enter new Rf)FLOW DEPTH:d=TSX 4-3 4. Capacity of the grate is based on HEC-22 equations.VELOCITY: V=(1.11/n)S0.5SX0.67T0.67 4-13 5. If no inlet is proposed, type 0 in the Inlet size (w) column.Qb=Q - Qi 4-15 6. The flooded width may be exaggerated in areas that have Line Drains. E0=1 - (1 - W/T)2.67 4-16 Since runoff is continually pulled off the roadway surface, not all of the Rf=1-0.09(V-Vo)4-18 water will still be against the barrier at the stations shown.RS=1/ [1+ (0.15V1.8/(SX L2.3))]4-19 7. Grated line drains are placed at the stations where the top of the line Qi= (flowby)Q [ RFEO + RS(1 - EO) ]4-21 drain is located. This is done so that water is modeled coming off the Qi= (sump)CwPd1.5 4-26 roadway surface at the first location it will be removed from the road-Qi = (sump orifice)COAg(2gd)0.5 4-27 way surface after the facility is built. ABBREVIATIONS: 8. At locations where there is a G1, G2, GD-1, GD-2, GD-3, or GD-4 and C Dimensionless runoff coefficient a line drain down stream of that inlet, a composite width will be calcu-Ceff Effective runoff coefficient (weighted average of C Pavement and C Open Space) lated for the two inlets. This is done so a single inlet can represent the Ieff Effective Rainfall Intensity (weighted average of 5 and 10 minute Intensities - depending on percentage of unpaved slope > 1:10) area between two stations. A weighted average was used to calcu-Qs Gutter flow rate late the composite inlet width. Another option is to break the line drain Qb Bypass flow not intercepted by upstream inlet into small increments and model them individually. This option will be Qgld Flow intercepted by GLD used in areas where the flooded width is exceeded with a composite Qwcb Flow intercepted by WCB inlet.Qtotal Total flow tributary to inlet (Qs + Qb - Qg) 9. In some cases, especially along the median, the shoulder has a Weff Effective inlet width (33% clogged for flowby, 50% clogged for sump) smaller cross slope than the traveled way. In this spreadsheet, only Peff Effective inlet perimeter shoulder slope value is considered for cross slope.Ku Units conversion factor or coefficient Vo Splash over velocity per HEC-22 Chart 5A Eo Ratio of frontal flow to total gutter flow RUNOFF Qtotal (cfs)Qwcb (cfs) ROADWAY C Pvmnt C Open Space Cross Slope Sx (ft/ft) Qb (cfs)Ceff Qs (cfs) Ieff (in/hr) Qgld (cfs) Profile Slope S (ft/ft)Pvmnt Area (ac) Unpaved Area (ac) Unpaved Area >10% Slope (ac) DRAINAGE AREA Total Area (ac) Measured % Unpaved Area >10% Slope Subarea No.SB Site Drainage Calculations Hydrologic Analysis & Inlet Calcs. 0% CHKD BY: CALC. BY: Return Frequency: 0 0 RemarksInlet Cap (cfs) Bypass (cfs)Rs Sump Inlet Capacity (cfs)Flanking Inlet Required?INLET CAPACITY Inlet Type Length (ft) Weff (ft) Peff (ft)Eo Inlet Size RfWidth (ft) Flow-by or Sump Inlet SHOULDER CAPACITYGUTTER Cross Slope Sw (ft/ft) Relative Gutter Cross Slope S'w (ft/ft) Gutter Depression a (in) Gutter Width W (ft) Gutter Flowrate Capacity Qw (cfs) Flow Depth d (ft) Flooded Width T (ft) Velocity (ft/sec) Allowable Flooded Depth (ft) Effective Slope Se (ft/ft) Roadway Flowrate Qs (cfs) Allowable Flooded Width (ft) Ratio of Flow Eo M 25-Year Storm Event Ceff, Ieff are weighted averages based on Itc=5min = X.XX in/hr, Itc=10min = X.XX in/hr Cunpaved,<10%slopes = 0.65, Cunpaved,>10% slopes = 0.80, and Cpaved areas = 1.00 TECHNICAL APPENDIX E Local Drainage Hydraulic Calculation Existing 48” RCP at Full Flow Proposed System Hydraulics Label Solve For Friction Method Roughness Coefficient 48inchLine Discharge Manning Formula 0.013 Channel Slope (ft/ft) Normal Depth (ft) Diameter (ft) Discharge (ft³/s) 0.00240 4.00 4.00 70.37 Flow Area (ft²) Wetted Perimeter (ft) Hydraulic Radius (ft) Top Width (ft) 12.57 12.57 1.00 0.00 Critical Depth (ft) Percent Full (%) Critical Slope (ft/ft) Velocity (ft/s) 2.54 100.0 0.00451 5.60 Velocity Head (ft) Specific Energy (ft) Froude Number Maximum Discharge (ft³/s) 0.49 4.49 0.00 75.69 Discharge Full (ft³/s) Slope Full (ft/ft) Flow Type Notes 70.37 0.00240 SubCritical Messages Circular Pipe (48_Line_FullFlow.fm8) Report 2/21/2020 2:13:05 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of1Page Messages Circular Pipe (48_Line_FullFlow.fm8) Report 2/21/2020 2:13:05 PM Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution CenterBentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2of2Page 002: C:\WSPG\Archive\Orangewood\Orange48.EDT FILE: Orange48.WSW W S P G W - EDIT LISTING - Version 14.10 Date: 3- 2-2020 Time: 6:30:28 WATER SURFACE PROFILE - CHANNEL DEFINITION LISTING PAGE 1 CARD SECT CHN NO OF AVE PIER HEIGHT 1 BASE ZL ZR INV Y(1) Y(2) Y(3) Y(4) Y(5) Y(6) Y(7) Y(8) Y(9) Y (10) CODE NO TYPE PIER/PIP WIDTH DIAMETER WIDTH DROP CD 1 4 1 4.000 CD 2 3 0 .000 3.000 5.000 .000 .000 .00 CD 3 4 1 1.500 W S P G W PAGE NO 1 WATER SURFACE PROFILE - TITLE CARD LISTING HEADING LINE NO 1 IS - Orangewood Ave Bridge Widening HEADING LINE NO 2 IS - 48" Main HEADING LINE NO 3 IS - D. Price, 2/25/2020 W S P G W PAGE NO 2 WATER SURFACE PROFILE - ELEMENT CARD LISTING ELEMENT NO 1 IS A SYSTEM OUTLET * * * U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT W S ELEV 1000.000 135.000 2 135.000 ELEMENT NO 2 IS A REACH * * * U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT N RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H 1019.190 135.190 2 .012 .000 .000 .000 0 ELEMENT NO 3 IS A TRANSITION * * * U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT N RADIUS ANGLE 1029.190 135.290 2 .015 .000 .000 WARNING - ADJACENT SECTIONS ARE NOT IDENTICAL - SEE SECTION NUMBERS AND CHANNEL DEFINITIONS ELEMENT NO 4 IS A REACH * * * U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT N RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H 1056.990 136.820 1 .012 45.000 35.396 .000 0 ELEMENT NO 5 IS A JUNCTION * * * * * * * U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT LAT-1 LAT-2 N Q3 Q4 INVERT-3 INVERT-4 PHI 3 PHI 4 1062.500 137.130 1 0 0 .015 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 RADIUS ANGLE .000 .000 ELEMENT NO 6 IS A REACH * * * U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT N RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H 1075.750 137.850 1 .012 45.001 -16.870 .000 0 ELEMENT NO 7 IS A JUNCTION * * * * * * * U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT LAT-1 LAT-2 N Q3 Q4 INVERT-3 INVERT-4 PHI 3 PHI 4 1077.490 137.950 1 3 0 .015 2.980 .000 139.830 .000 -58.700 .000 RADIUS ANGLE .000 .000 ELEMENT NO 8 IS A REACH * * * U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT N RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H 1093.470 138.830 1 .012 35.776 -25.592 .000 0 ELEMENT NO 9 IS A JUNCTION * * * * * * * U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT LAT-1 LAT-2 N Q3 Q4 INVERT-3 INVERT-4 PHI 3 PHI 4 1098.140 138.920 1 0 0 .015 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 RADIUS ANGLE .000 .000 W S P G W PAGE NO 3 WATER SURFACE PROFILE - ELEMENT CARD LISTING ELEMENT NO 10 IS A REACH * * * U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT N RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H 1108.140 138.940 1 .012 .000 .000 .000 0 ELEMENT NO 11 IS A SYSTEM HEADWORKS * * U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT W S ELEV 1108.140 138.940 1 142.940 002: C:\WSPG\Archive\Orangewood\Orange48.OUT FILE: Orange48.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.08 PAGE 1 Program Package Serial Number: 7172 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date: 3- 2-2020 Time: 6:30:32 Orangewood Ave Bridge Widening 48" Main D. Price, 2/25/2020 ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Height/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X-Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1000.000 135.000 1.460 136.460 73.34 10.05 1.57 138.03 .00 1.88 5.00 3.000 5.000 .00 0 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 19.190 .0099 .0070 .13 1.46 1.47 1.31 .012 .00 .00 BOX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1019.190 135.190 1.514 136.704 73.34 9.69 1.46 138.16 .00 1.88 5.00 3.000 5.000 .00 0 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- TRANS STR .0100 .0104 .10 1.51 1.39 .015 .00 .00 B OX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1029.190 135.290 1.506 136.796 73.34 16.95 4.46 141.26 .77 2.59 3.88 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .951 .0550 .0243 .02 2.27 2.83 1.22 .012 .00 .0 0 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1030.141 135.342 1.510 136.852 73.34 16.88 4.43 141.28 .76 2.59 3.88 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 10.765 .0550 .0227 .24 2.27 2.81 1.2 2 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1040.905 135.935 1.565 137.499 73.34 16.10 4.02 141.52 .70 2.59 3.90 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 8.803 .0550 .0199 .18 2.26 2.63 1.22 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1049.709 136.419 1.621 138.041 73.34 15.35 3.66 141.70 .64 2.59 3.93 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 7.281 .0550 .0175 .13 2.26 2.45 1.22 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1056.990 136.820 1.681 138.501 73.34 14.64 3.33 141.83 .00 2.59 3.95 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0563 .0244 .13 2.26 2.29 .015 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1062.500 137.130 1.725 138.855 73.34 14.14 3.11 141.96 .55 2.59 3.96 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 4.757 .0543 .0141 .07 2.27 2.18 1.22 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1067.257 137.389 1.780 139.168 73.34 13.57 2.86 142.03 .51 2.59 3.98 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 4.636 .0543 .0125 .06 2.29 2.05 1.22 .012 .00 .00 PIPE 002: C:\WSPG\Archive\Orangewood\Orange48.OUT FILE: Orange48.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.08 PAGE 2 Program Package Serial Number: 7172 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date: 3- 2-2020 Time: 6:30:32 Orangewood Ave Bridge Widening 48" Main D. Price, 2/25/2020 ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Height/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X -Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1071.893 137.640 1.846 139.486 73.34 12.94 2.60 142.09 .46 2.59 3.99 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 3.857 .0543 .0110 .04 2.31 1.91 1.22 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1075.750 137.850 1.915 139.765 73.34 12.34 2.36 142.13 .00 2.59 4.00 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0575 .0177 .03 2.44 1.78 .015 .00 .00 P IPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1077.490 137.950 1.778 139.728 70.36 13.04 2.64 142.37 .59 2.54 3.98 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 2.662 .0551 .0118 .03 2.36 1.97 1.19 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1080.152 138.097 1.820 139.917 70.36 12.64 2.48 142.40 .55 2.54 3.98 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 3.546 .0551 .0106 .04 2.37 1.89 1.19 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1083.698 138.292 1.888 140.180 70.36 12.05 2.26 142.44 .50 2.54 3.99 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 2.928 .0551 .0094 .03 2.39 1.76 1.19 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1086.626 138.453 1.960 140.413 70.36 11.49 2.05 142.46 .46 2.54 4.00 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 2.387 .0551 .0082 .02 2.42 1.64 1.19 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1089.013 138.585 2.034 140.619 70.36 10.96 1.86 142.48 .42 2.54 4.00 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 1.906 .0551 .0073 .01 2.45 1.52 1.19 .012 .00 .00 P IPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1090.919 138.690 2.113 140.802 70.36 10.45 1.70 142.50 .38 2.54 3.99 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 1.474 .0551 .0064 .01 2.49 1.42 1.19 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1092.393 138.771 2.195 140.966 70.36 9.96 1.54 142.51 .34 2.54 3.98 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 1.077 .0551 .0057 .01 2.54 1.32 1.19 .012 .00 .00 PIPE 002: C:\WSPG\Archive\Orangewood\Orange48.OUT FILE: Orange48.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.08 PAGE 3 Program Package Serial Number: 7172 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date: 3- 2-2020 Time: 6:30:32 Orangewood Ave Bridge Widening 48" Main D. Price, 2/25/2020 ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Height/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X -Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1093.470 138.830 2.282 141.112 70.36 9.50 1.40 142.51 .00 2.54 3.96 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0193 .0071 .03 2.28 1.22 .015 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1098.140 138.920 2.535 141.455 70.36 8.38 1.09 142.55 .00 2.54 3.85 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 4.974 .0020 .0036 .02 2.54 1.0 0 3.32 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1103.114 138.930 2.642 141.572 70.36 7.99 .99 142.56 .00 2.54 3.79 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 5.026 .0020 .0033 .02 2.64 .92 3.32 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1108.140 138.940 2.682 141.622 70.36 7.85 .96 142.58 .00 2.54 3.76 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 002: C:\WSPG\Archive\Orangewood\OrangeLat1.EDT FILE: OrangeLat1.WSW W S P G W - EDIT LISTING - Version 14.10 Date: 3- 2-2020 Time: 6:31: 5 WATER SURFACE PROFILE - CHANNEL DEFINITION LISTING PAGE 1 CARD SECT CHN NO OF AVE PIER HEIGHT 1 BASE ZL ZR INV Y(1) Y(2) Y(3) Y(4) Y(5) Y(6) Y(7) Y(8) Y(9) Y (10) CODE NO TYPE PIER/PIP WIDTH DIAMETER WIDTH DROP CD 1 4 1 1.500 W S P G W PAGE NO 1 WATER SURFACE PROFILE - TITLE CARD LISTING HEADING LINE NO 1 IS - Orangewood Ave Bridge Widening HEADING LINE NO 2 IS - Lateral 1 HEADING LINE NO 3 IS - D. Price, 2/25/2020 W S P G W PAGE NO 2 WATER SURFACE PROFILE - ELEMENT CARD LISTING ELEMENT NO 1 IS A SYSTEM OUTLET * * * U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT W S ELEV 1000.000 139.830 1 139.830 ELEMENT NO 2 IS A REACH * * * U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT N RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H 1008.110 140.640 1 .012 .000 .000 .000 0 ELEMENT NO 3 IS A JUNCTION * * * * * * * U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT LAT-1 LAT-2 N Q3 Q4 INVERT-3 INVERT-4 PHI 3 PHI 4 1010.240 140.660 1 1 0 .015 1.630 .000 151.710 .000 -90.000 .000 RADIUS ANGLE .000 .000 ELEMENT NO 4 IS A REACH * * * U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT N RADIUS ANGLE ANG PT MAN H 1109.420 143.640 1 .012 .000 .000 28.136 0 ELEMENT NO 5 IS A SYSTEM HEADWORKS * * U/S DATA STATION INVERT SECT W S ELEV 1111.550 144.190 1 152.190 002: C:\WSPG\Archive\Orangewood\OrangeLat1.OUT FILE: OrangeLat1.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.08 PAGE 1 Program Package Serial Number: 7172 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date: 3- 2-2020 Time: 6:31:11 Orangewood Ave Bridge Widening Lateral 1 D. Price, 2/25/2020 ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Height/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X-Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1000.000 139.830 .374 140.204 2.98 8.64 1.16 141.36 .00 .66 1.30 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .103 .0999 .0366 .00 .37 2.96 .29 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1000.103 139.840 .375 140.216 2.98 8.61 1.15 141.37 .00 .66 1.30 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 1.395 .0999 .0341 .05 .38 2.94 .29 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1001.498 139.980 .388 140.368 2.98 8.21 1.05 141.42 .00 .66 1.31 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 1.168 .0999 .0298 .03 .39 2.75 .29 .012 .00 .0 0 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1002.666 140.096 .402 140.498 2.98 7.83 .95 141.45 .00 .66 1.33 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .985 .0999 .0261 .03 .40 2.58 .2 9 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1003.651 140.195 .416 140.610 2.98 7.47 .87 141.48 .00 .66 1.34 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .835 .0999 .0228 .02 .42 2.41 .29 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1004.486 140.278 .430 140.708 2.98 7.12 .79 141.49 .00 .66 1.36 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .708 .0999 .0200 .01 .43 2.26 .29 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1005.193 140.349 .445 140.794 2.98 6.79 .72 141.51 .00 .66 1.37 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .601 .0999 .0175 .01 .45 2.11 .29 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1005.795 140.409 .461 140.869 2.98 6.47 .65 141.52 .00 .66 1.38 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .508 .0999 .0153 .01 .46 1.98 .29 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1006.302 140.459 .477 140.936 2.98 6.17 .59 141.53 .00 .66 1.40 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .427 .0999 .0134 .01 .48 1.85 .29 .012 .00 .00 PIPE 002: C:\WSPG\Archive\Orangewood\OrangeLat1.OUT FILE: OrangeLat1.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.08 PAGE 2 Program Package Serial Number: 7172 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date: 3- 2-2020 Time: 6:31:11 Orangewood Ave Bridge Widening Lateral 1 D. Price, 2/25/2020 ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Height/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X -Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1006.730 140.502 .494 140.996 2.98 5.88 .54 141.53 .00 .66 1.41 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .356 .0999 .0118 .00 .49 1.73 .29 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1007.085 140.538 .511 141.049 2.98 5.61 .49 141.54 .00 .66 1.42 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .294 .0999 .0103 .00 .51 1.62 .29 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1007.379 140.567 .529 141.096 2.98 5.35 .44 141.54 .00 .66 1.43 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .236 .0999 .0090 .00 .53 1.51 .29 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1007.616 140.591 .548 141.139 2.98 5.10 .40 141.54 .00 .66 1.44 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .185 .0999 .0079 .00 .55 1.41 .29 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1007.801 140.609 .568 141.177 2.98 4.86 .37 141.54 .00 .66 1.46 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .138 .0999 .0069 .00 .57 1.32 .29 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1007.939 140.623 .588 141.211 2.98 4.64 .33 141.54 .00 .66 1.46 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .096 .0999 .0061 .00 .59 1.23 .29 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1008.036 140.633 .610 141.242 2.98 4.42 .30 141.55 .00 .66 1.47 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .056 .0999 .0054 .00 .61 1.15 .29 .012 .00 .00 P IPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1008.091 140.638 .632 141.270 2.98 4.21 .28 141.55 .00 .66 1.48 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .019 .0999 .0047 .00 .63 1.07 .29 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1008.110 140.640 .656 141.296 2.98 4.01 .25 141.55 .00 .66 1.49 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0094 .0036 .01 .66 1.00 .015 .00 .00 PIPE 002: C:\WSPG\Archive\Orangewood\OrangeLat1.OUT FILE: OrangeLat1.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.08 PAGE 3 Program Package Serial Number: 7172 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date: 3- 2-2020 Time: 6:31:11 Orangewood Ave Bridge Widening Lateral 1 D. Price, 2/25/2020 ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Height/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X -Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1010.240 140.660 .975 141.635 1.35 1.11 .02 141.65 .00 .44 1.43 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 1.256 .0300 .0003 .00 .98 .21 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1011.496 140.698 .936 141.634 1.35 1.16 .02 141.65 .00 .44 1.45 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 1.170 .0300 .0003 .00 .94 .2 3 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1012.665 140.733 .899 141.632 1.35 1.22 .02 141.65 .00 .44 1.47 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 1.093 .0300 .0003 .00 .90 .25 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1013.759 140.766 .864 141.630 1.35 1.28 .03 141.66 .00 .44 1.48 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 1.026 .0300 .0004 .00 .86 .27 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1014.785 140.797 .831 141.628 1.35 1.34 .03 141.66 .00 .44 1.49 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .962 .0300 .0004 .00 .83 .29 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1015.747 140.825 .800 141.625 1.35 1.41 .03 141.66 .00 .44 1.50 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .904 .0300 .0005 .00 .80 .31 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1016.651 140.853 .770 141.623 1.35 1.48 .03 141.66 .00 .44 1.50 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .844 .0300 .0005 .00 .77 .33 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1017.496 140.878 .742 141.620 1.35 1.55 .04 141.66 .00 .44 1.50 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .794 .0300 .0006 .00 .74 .36 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1018.290 140.902 .715 141.617 1.35 1.63 .04 141.66 .00 .44 1.50 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .740 .0300 .0007 .00 .71 .38 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE 002: C:\WSPG\Archive\Orangewood\OrangeLat1.OUT FILE: OrangeLat1.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.08 PAGE 4 Program Package Serial Number: 7172 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date: 3- 2-2020 Time: 6:31:11 Orangewood Ave Bridge Widening Lateral 1 D. Price, 2/25/2020 ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Height/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X -Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1019.030 140.924 .689 141.613 1.35 1.70 .05 141.66 .00 .44 1.49 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .483 .0300 .0008 .00 .69 .41 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1019.513 140.939 .664 141.603 1.35 1.79 .05 141.65 .00 .44 1.49 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- HYDRAULIC JUMP | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1019.513 140.939 .266 141.204 1.35 6.38 .63 141.84 .00 .44 1.15 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 35.470 .0300 .0300 1.07 .27 2.62 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1054.982 142.004 .266 142.270 1.35 6.38 .63 142.90 .00 .44 1.15 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 25.498 .0300 .0289 .74 .27 2.62 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1080.480 142.770 .271 143.042 1.35 6.20 .60 143.64 .00 .44 1.15 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 10.918 .0300 .0259 .28 .27 2.52 .27 .012 .00 .00 P IPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1091.397 143.098 .280 143.379 1.35 5.91 .54 143.92 .00 .44 1.17 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 5.384 .0300 .0226 .12 .28 2.36 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1096.781 143.260 .290 143.550 1.35 5.64 .49 144.04 .00 .44 1.18 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 3.418 .0300 .0198 .07 .29 2.21 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1100.199 143.363 .300 143.663 1.35 5.38 .45 144.11 .00 .44 1.20 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 2.405 .0300 .0173 .04 .30 2.07 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1102.604 143.435 .310 143.745 1.35 5.13 .41 144.15 .00 .44 1.21 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 1.779 .0300 .0151 .03 .31 1.94 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE 002: C:\WSPG\Archive\Orangewood\OrangeLat1.OUT FILE: OrangeLat1.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.08 PAGE 5 Program Package Serial Number: 7172 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date: 3- 2-2020 Time: 6:31:11 Orangewood Ave Bridge Widening Lateral 1 D. Price, 2/25/2020 ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Heig ht/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X -Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1104.384 143.489 .320 143.809 1.35 4.89 .37 144.18 .00 .44 1.23 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 1.354 .0300 .0132 .02 .32 1.82 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1105.738 143.529 .331 143.860 1.35 4.66 .34 144.20 .00 .44 1.24 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 1.046 .0300 .0115 .01 .33 1.70 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1106.784 143.561 .342 143.903 1.35 4.44 .31 144.21 .00 .44 1.26 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .810 .0300 .0101 .01 .34 1.59 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1107.594 143.585 .354 143.939 1.35 4.24 .28 144.22 .00 .44 1.27 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .619 .0300 .0088 .01 .35 1.49 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1108.212 143.604 .366 143.970 1.35 4.04 .25 144.22 .00 .44 1.29 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .467 .0300 .0077 .00 .37 1.40 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1108.679 143.618 .379 143.997 1.35 3.85 .23 144.23 .00 .44 1.30 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .340 .0300 .0067 .00 .38 1.31 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1109.019 143.628 .392 144.020 1.35 3.67 .21 144.23 .00 .44 1.32 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .225 .0300 .0059 .00 .39 1.23 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1109.244 143.635 .406 144.040 1.35 3.50 .19 144.23 .00 .44 1.33 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .133 .0300 .0052 .00 .41 1.15 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1109.377 143.639 .420 144.058 1.35 3.34 .17 144.23 .00 .44 1.35 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .043 .0300 .0045 .00 .42 1.07 .27 .012 .00 .00 PIPE 002: C:\WSPG\Archive\Orangewood\OrangeLat1.OUT FILE: OrangeLat1.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.08 PAGE 6 Program Package Serial Number: 7172 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date: 3- 2-2020 Time: 6:31:11 Orangewood Ave Bridge Widening Lateral 1 D. Price, 2/25/2020 ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Height/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X-Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1109.420 143.640 .435 144.075 1.35 3.17 .16 144.23 .00 .44 1.36 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1111.550 144.190 .435 144.625 1.35 3.17 .16 144.78 .00 .44 1.36 1.500 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- APPENDIX E SB 18 Consultation Memorandum This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 | Santa Ana, CA 92707 Office: 949.472.3505 | Fax: 949.472.8373 MEMORANDUM To: Andy T. Uk, City of Anaheim From: Kristen Bogue, Michael Baker International Date: October 19, 2021 Subject: Orangewood Avenue Improvements – SB 18 Consultation Memorandum for the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Addendum On Tuesday, May 25, 2021, the City submitted and initiated a Tribal Consultation List request for a list of California Native American tribes’ contacts and a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search from the NAHC. On Thursday, June 10, 2021, the NAHC responded to the City’s request and returned a populated Tribal Consultation List with California Native American Tribes’ contact information for tribes that have traditional lands or cultural places within the boundaries of the county (Orange County), which the project site is located within. Additionally, NAHC returned results for the SLF and the results came back negative. The City wrote SB 18 notification letters to all of the tribes listed on the Tribal Consultation List that NAHC provided. The letters explain the proposed project, which includes General Plan amendments as part of this City initiated action. On Tuesday, June 15, 2021, the City emailed and certified mailed physical copies of these letters to the tribes on the Tribal Consultation List. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6254, subdivision (r) and 6254.10. (Public Resources Code Section 21082.3, subdivision (c)(1)) and Public Resources Code Section 21082.3, subdivision (c)(2)(A)), records of Native American graves, cemeteries, and sacred places and records of Native American places, features, and objects described in Sections 5097.9 and 5097.993 of the Public Resources Code maintained by, or in the possession of, the Native American Heritage Commission, another state agency, or a local agency are not required to be disclosed. Further, disclosure of records that relate to archaeological site information and reports maintained by, or in the possession of, the Department of Parks and Recreation, the State Historical Resources Commission, the State Lands Commission, the Native American Heritage Commission, another state agency, or a local agency, including the records that the agency obtains through a consultation process between a California Native American tribe and a state or local agency are not required to be disclosed as well. It is acknowledged that the City of Anaheim maintains such records, as applicable, and will make correspondences, notification letters, etc., available at the City, should members of the public request them. Such a request can be made to Andy Uk at auk@anaheim.net, or 714-765-5238.