Resolution-PC 89-1861,1 M
. . ~:i'.. ~~ a i ti;~; ~%4f ~~~i~~~~~;~tt'
,~?
~ <(-~;r.r., .
~ESOT.~TJTIODT N0. PC89-~.86
A BES~LUTTQN OF THL A~AHEIM CITY PI,ANNING COMMISSTON
THAT. PETITTON FOR VARIANCE NQ. 3973 HE GRANTFD
WHER~A5, the Anahoim City P.lannir.g Comttiission dicl receive a
verifiad PQtition far Varianco from KOLL COMPANY, 4343 Vo: ICarm~n Avenue,
Suite fI, Tustin, CA 92680, owner, and K. W. LAWLER & AS~OCIATES, INC., 2832
Walruti Avenue, SuiLe H, Tustin, CA 92fi40, agent for ce.ctain rea]. progerty
situate~9 in the City of Anaheim, Countx of Orange, State oi Ca.liforziia
de:cribed as:
THAT PORTTQN Ot~ T.HE NORTHW~ST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTAEAST ~UART~R OF SEf;:CION 23, TOWNSEIIP 4 SOUrfi,
RAt3GE 10 WEST, TN THF RANCIiO SAN JUAN' CAJON DE SI~NTA
ANA, A~ PER b1AP k~CORDED IIv BOOK 51 PA(,E 10 OF
MISCFLLANEOUS MAYS, IN T:•iE OFCIC~ UF TH~ COUNTY
RECORUIsR OF SAID COUNrY, LYING SOUTFiW~STERLY OC A
LItTc CONCENTitTC WITH AND S~UTHWESLERLY 5.~0 FFET FROM
THF. SOUTFrF1ESTERLY RTGHT OF WAY LINE OF TH~ ATCHISGN
TOP~FA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY' CONiPANY R~CORDED ITI BOQK
593 T'AGE 109 UF DEEDS IN THE OFFICE QF THE COUNTY
RECORLER OF LAS ANGELGS COUNTY CA~,IFORNTA, AND
DIORTH~RLX OI' TH~ NORTHER.LY F.TGFIT AF WAY LINE GF
TUSTIN F3RANCH OF THE SOUTHRRN PACIFIC RAILRO~
COMPA.NY, AS PE.R D~ED RECOR~ED IN BOOIi 461 PAC,E 2I OF
SAID DEEDS Or LOS ANGELCS rOUNTY.
WHERIsAS, the City Planning Comnussion did hnld a pub].ic hearin,q
at Che Civic CE31~.tRL' irZ the Cit_~ of Anaheim on July 17, 1989, at 1:a0 p.m.,
n~tice of: said public hearing h~•,ving heezi duly given as recfuirQd by law an,d in
accoxdance with the prov:.sions of ~he Anaheirn Muniaipttl Cude, Chapter 18.03,
to hear azzd consider. ~vidence ~ot and again:~t said proposed variance an.d to
investigate and make Lin~ii.ric~s and recommendations in connection there~with; and
iVHEREAS, said Co~nnission, after iiue inspectior~, inve3tigation
and study made by iLself and i:i its behalE, and nfCer du~ considerati.on of all
evi;~en~e and reports oCtered at said hearing, doc~s find and deterrninQ the
f.ollowing facts:
l. T1nat the peLitiener raguest3 waiver of the follawing ~,o
establish a 12-lot ind.usLrial subdivision:
.~E ~T~lT .lfi.01.13Q - Re uired lot fron~: c~„~g,.
~All lats zequirad t~ abut a publi~ street or allev;
Lot Nos. 7 through 12 abut;ting privata clri.ygwavs)
2. ~h~t ~he above-me:fitiorit~d waivor is hereby granLed on the basis
that there are specia'1 circumstances applicable to the prop~rty such as size,
shape, topography, lor.atior! and surrounclings wYiieh c1o not apply to ot}~er
identically zoned propert.y in t~1P. sarne vicinity; and ~hat Strict a~plic~tion
oP the Zoning Code deprives khe property o:E privileges er.joyed by othar
properties in the identical zone anc~ cl.assi.fication in the vicznity.
;, ~
0959r -1- PC89-186
,~'`~4,>:~
)
4'~hih4~
i ~
^
,,.
3. That there r~re exceptional or extraordinury circumstances
or conditions appZicable to the property involved or to the intend~+d uso of
the propE3rty that da not apply ;?nerally t~ the prope~rty or class of t~se in
the same vicinity ancl zone.
4. That tYie rec~uested variarico is necessary for Che
, ~ reser~iation azid enjoyment of a substantial praperty right possessecl Uy other
~ property zn thP same vicinity and ~ane, r~nd denied to the property in gueskion. ~
~
;
, 5. Thak the requestod variance wil]. not be materialxy
~ detrimental to the ~~zblic we1£~~.re or injuriou~ to tha property or improvQmonts
''. in such vicin,i*y and z~ne in which tha property .is located because private
' 8riveways cemplying with city s~andards will privide saf.e and adequate
vehicular access.
ti. That no or,e ir~dicated thPir prosence at saic3 public hearing
in ogposi~ion; ar~d that no correspondence w~s received in opp~sition tu
subj~ct petiLion.
; ALIFC~P,NI~~ ENVIF NMCI~ITAT~ QUALITY ACT FITIUING: That the Anaheim
City Ylanning (;ommission has reviewed the proposal to establish a 12-lat
industzial subd.ivisicn w~ith waiver of reauired lot frontage on an
irregularly-shaped parcel of: la:1d consisting of approximately 6.R acres
located at the southeast corne~ o£ Cerritos Avenue and Lewis StreeY., havfng
approxi.mate frontages oC 440 feet on tho south sxdQ of Cerritos Avenua and
570 f~et on tho east side of. i~ewis Stree~., and furthez• described as 1000 E,
Cerritos AvenuQ; ar,d cloes hereby approve the Nec~ative Declara~ion upon
findiny th~t it has considerc:d the Negative 17ecZaration togQthpr with any '~f
commsnts receivod during thc~ public rQVi~w process and further findinq on the
basi;, of the initial study and any comments recezved that tl~ere is no ~:``
substantial evid~nc8 that the ~rojert will hava a signific~nt e£t9ct on the
enviranment. _,
hOW, THERFFOR~, T3E IT RESOLVED thal tha Anahoim City Plann3ng
C~mmission c3oes hereby c~rant subject Fetition for Varianc~, upon the
following aonditions which are hereby founci ~o be ~ x~ecessary preroquisite k.o
the proposed use of ~he sub;jeci: property in order to preserve Y.he safety and
general welfare of khe Citizens nE the City of: Anaheim:
1. That the owner/cieveloper of subject: proper~y shalY mak~; prav,isions for
sc~~arate fire service for each porcel ot lanc~, as required hy the City
Fire Aepartment.
2. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate traffic
ttignal assessmen~ fee st:a11 be paid to ~he City of Anaheim in an amount
as est~sbla.sYied by City Cc~uncil rosolution.
~'~ ~
3. That no oukdoor storage shall bg permitted on any cf the lots within
subject subiiivision, as spPCified 'by tha City Traffic En~.;ine~a•.
4. 7'hat ~:he proposal sha11 comply with all signing requir.ements of the ML
"Industrial, Limi.ted" Zone, unless a variance alloraing sign waivers is
approved by the CiCy Council, Planning Comm.ission or Zoninq Admznis+trator.
'~:
-2- PC89-18@
,::;f
';';:;
~~
1~~i n ~~`~~~~,~,3
. . . . ` '`' ..~}f`I',
i;
~ ~ .'~ ,~.-~~~~
1
j
5. That prior ~o the commenc.amont of the activity aut2ior,ized under i:2xis
resalution, or prior ko Lhe ~ime that a building permi.t is issued, ur
within a p~3rio3 of ninety (90) days fr~m tre date of this reso3.ution,
whichever o~~curs £irst, the legal ownsr(s) of subject pro~ert~y sha~.l
execute and i•ecorcl a ~ovenant in a forin appro~ied by the City~ Attorney' s
O:Efice wherein such own~r ( s) agree not L•o co:~test ~)ie £ormation of any
as~essment district(s) which may h~r.eaft~r be formed pursuant to the
pravisions ai Developmenr. Agreement No, 83-01 betwoer~ the City of Anaheim
and Anah~im Stadiwn Associates, whic:t- disl-.rict(s) coulcl include such
legal groporty o~rner's property.
6. That the owner of subject property shall submit a lett.er requesting
termination of Conditiona] Use Permit No. 2801 to 'c:kze 'Loning Division.
%. Thai: subject property shall~ be devPloped substantially iYi accordance with
plans and specifications oiz file with the Cit.y of Anaheim m~.rke~ Exhihit
Nqs. 1 thruugh 13.
8. Tha~ Condi.tion No. 5, ahove-mentionad, sha11 be completed within a period
af ninety (90) r3ays Erom the date of this resolu.tion.
9. T2iat prior to issuanco o£ a building permit o~ with~:1 a per3.o~i of one (:l)
year from the date of tY~is CCiuQ1Ut]1011~ wk~ichever occurs fsrst, ~onditinn
Nas. ]., 2 and 6, above-mentzoned, sha11 be complied wiL-h. Ext~nsions Por
further time tv ~omplete said concl.itions may be grantod in accordance
with 5ection 18.03.090 of the Anahaim Munici~al Cad~.
10. That prior to final Uuilcling anti zoning insp~otions, Condition No. 7,
above-mentionea, sh.all be complied wititi.
11. Tne~t approva:l of thzs application r,onstitutE~s approva:l of the propused
r~qutist onZy tc t'he extent that i1: complies with the Anaheirn Munici~ial
Zoning C~de and any ottier a~plicable ~ ity regu:latior_s. Approval does not
.~ti include any action or fizadings as to compliance or a~+proval oE the
~ requc:st .reg~-rding sriy other applicable ordinance, regulation or
~ r~q~:irement.
BE IT FU.RTHLR RESOL~TLD thaC the Anah~im City ~lanning Comm:Ession does
hexeby find and detormine rhat adoption of this Reso'luti~n is expressly
f. .
predicated upun applicant's compli~nce w.ith each and all of the conditions
:~ereinabove se~ forth. Should any such eonditi~ns, or any part tliereof, be
~.`;, declared invalid or unonforceable by khe fi.nal judgmsYit. of any court of
rompetent jurisdiction, L-h~n this R~solut.ion, and any eppr~vals herein
contained, shall Le deeme~ nu7.1 and void.
THE FUR~GQIPIG RESOLUTICIN is signeci and approved by me this 17th day uf
Jiz~y, Y989. r
'~..t''.G~ -a ~ ! ~2 .~'1;/" -
CFIAIRDIAN, ANAHEIM CITY ILANNING COt~9dISSION'
<;: I
:,'_, ~
,'.I
:~
,
''~
-3~ PC89-1f3G
;"i
t,{"~ .
'; ~ r, . ,~. ebre ~Y'~
;n, . _ __ ..,. .
F`~ _ . ,. i~ ~
'.+~ ~ y ` :tll
~/~
,. ~ ~~~ ~~'f ~ .UC
,, ~ ~ , . ~:~~
~i! 1.
. ~,
~Tr.~sr: ' -
. W /) , L~~ _ ~ ~ ~ • ,~~
.~' ~cs.,,.-
SECRETA Y, ANAHCIM CITY PLA N:[ G COMMTSSrON
CTA1'E OE' CALTFQRNIA )
;'.; CQiJN'~X qF ORAt3GE ) ss. ~j
~ C]'TY OF ANAFi~,irf )
i
I, Edith I,. Harris, Secr~tary of khe Aiis~heim City Plann? ng Commiss:on, do ~
hereby c~rt:,ify that th~i Eoregoing resolution was pd~sed and adopted at a
~~
r•
M1
', .e
+,•t
rnQeting of tho Anaheim City Planning Cornmi ,sion helcl on .7uly 17, 1989, by rhe
folloWing vote of the members ~hereof.i
AYES: CbN,hfzSSIO~IERS: AJUAS, BOXDSI'L1N, ;ARUSILLO, ~L'LA.EiAUS, HGRBST,
MC BURNEY, ME~SE
NUES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: :~ONE
'IN WTT~`~;SS WHGRE4F, I h^ve hD+-9ttnt,n set my han~i this 17t1i day oE
July, 1y89.
~..__ ~ ~ ~ '1 ~ •
SECR~.'fARY; ANAHBIM CY1'Y PLAN G COMh! :;L SIOfI
-~- rce9-iah
.~~
~
i
T;
.";L
,,.1~
~k
~;J