Resolution-PC 89-19~~
,F'~'[h'~
r .
R~.~~~ITi~N~..~~~ _12
~
A RE50LUTTON OF THE AIYT-IIEIM CITY PGAI3NING COMM:[SSION
THAT x~ETTTION FOR VARTANCE N0. 3892 B~ GRT-IJTED
'~:;' '"~,~ ;' ~~?'~~~~~,
, ~
~; ,
a
+<J
3;'r
a ~'
~Yt ~'~
;~i'
, ,;i...::_
i ~,.
p ;'
!.,
~~ ~ ~,_~.;
WIiEF2~AS, the Anaheim Ci.ty 2~la~ning Cornmiss~.on ciid receive a ~';
verified Petitian Eor Variance from LTN:LVER5ITY CINEMI-, ~ CA,L•IY'ORNIa T~:[MI'TFD `.:~,;
F~ARTNERSHIk~, A~7': BRUCE SANBORN, Suite '13, Corporare Plaza~ Newport Heach,
CA 92660, awner oF cextain real ~,ropexty situated xn tYie City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, St~te of l:alifornia described as: ~'
i'r j
PARCEL 1~S SHOWN ON A PARCEL MAY F.'ILED IN BOOTt 84, ~~~~
;;. ,
Pd~GES 5, fi, 7 AND 8 OI' PARCEL NiT+I~5 IDI THE OFr^ICE tl~ ~';
THE COZINTY RECORDER OF' ORANG~ COUN'TY, CA.LIFQRNIA j,:'.
WIiLREAS, the City P1anning C~mmi~sion e~id hol.d a public l~oaring
at the Ci.vir, Centex in the City of Anahei~r ~zi Jai:uary 1h, 1989, ut 1c30 p.m.,
notice af said public hear3x~g having b:+en d~xly giveit at~ raqui•r~d by law and in
accardance wath the pravisions of the Auaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1~.03,
to hr.ar and canuider avidc~nce ~or ar.d against said proposed varian~:e and to
invest,igate and mal:e findinga a~nd recommer~rlat:ions in connection therzwith; and
WHEREAS, r~aid Comriissior., ~fter due insnection, inve~tigation
ancl study made by ikself and iri 3.ts behalf, and after duo consideration of. all
evidenca and repurts ~f~ered at said hearing, does find and d~termine the
fcllowing fact-s:
1. That the p~titioner propo:~~s wa.ivQr of the fo:llowing tn
cansirucr_ one 242-squax~ foot freestandfnq sian and two 152-aqua~te foot roof.
signs foL~ 3 previ~usly approved thea~ter complex:
~C~TT N 1Qz25~1. - .P.~'X~~~.~~iqn, .
(nc Pi•eestandinq or roof sign~ permi.tt.Pa in the
!:G(SC) Zono; ~r ~ fxeostandinq and `..wo roof
signs proposed).
2. That the ab~ve-mgntionc~d waivQra ure hereby grante:l on the
basis that thQre are specia? ci.rcwnstancas ap~licable to the propr~rty such as
:~ize, shape, topog~aphy, lo~ation and surroun8ings which ~o not apply t:o other
identically zor~ed property in L•he same vicinity; and that strict applicatio;~
ai the Zoning Code dapr.iv~s tlio property of pri~~i3oggs enjQye~ by othor
propert3es in tho iilea~ical zons~ and classifica~ion in the vi.ciuity.
3. That thore are exceptional or extraordinary circumst~nc~s
or, ~onditions applicable ko the pr.operty invol~ved or to the intondod use of
the property thar do not apply ~enerall.y to the property cr class of uae in
the aame vicinity anfl zone.
0627r -1- PC89-19
~ , . _ , ~ :~'fii"~~
y j~i ~~ ;}~ ~~.'~' 1~1 v ~'(•I ; ~~.'.a r i~':<"'{i~ti11nV(7 V~1•,~Y ~ 1F;~r i t~~`i~w 1!.:~'' 4 ~ r~ty..~~ i
~, ~ . ! a„~ 5'~i. ~ d~~i, Y~(r ~ q t,b~l~:r ~~~.~:~~r1`~~fr~~.C(
~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~~;~~ ~ t:~
r?':~~\;~ ,.
, ,. ~~?,•k1~
4, 't'hat tlle reques~ed variance is necessary for the prosorvation
and en.;jaymen~ of a substantial gropa~rCy ri.ght posaossed by other property in
~ha .san-e vir.i~ait;y ancl zono, an~~ dena.e~d to khH Pr~perty in qu.esti~ri.
5. Thnt rhe requsstod variance will nnt be mcxt;erially dotrimantal
to ttie public: welfare or injuriaus to the propert,y or lmpravements in such
vici~lity and.~aone in which th~ proper~y is located.
6. Th1t no one indicated rhoir prasenco at said publi.c het+rinc~ in
oppoi~ition; anfl that ;io correspon6ence was receiv9d in opposit:ion i:~ subject
peCil:iun.
~AL7:~RNZA ENVIRQNMF TAL UAI~IT7~ ACT F_~~1llTN~; The Planning
DirecCor or his authorize3 represenkative has cletermined that the progo~ed
proj~-ct Palls with.in the definition of CaLegoxical Exemptions, Class 11, as
defi~ied in the State ETR GuiclelinQS and is, theretore, categorxcally exempt
[rom the requirsmr~z. ~. Co prepare an EIR.
NOW, THEREFQRi„ BE IT RGSOLVED thar the Anahoim Citg Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Peti~ion for Variance, upon the
folloWing condiCions which are tioreby t'ounc' to be a necQSSary pr~requxs.ite to
the proposed usa of t;he subject property in order ~o ~reserve the safety ~nd
general welfare of the Ci~izons of the Ci~y o£ Anaheim:
l. ThaL- the ex.igtang frees~a:adinq sign shaJ.l be romover~ from subject
property,
2. That the proposed signs sYia11 bs ser.ved by undQrground eler,trical
service.
3. TY-at t.hP freestandiny sign shall be located a minirr~um of. seven ('7) Eeet
£rom the proport~ line adjacent to La P~lma Avenue (after crikical
intersection dedication), as requi.red b,y the City Traffic ~nginear.
4. That unless a vr~riance is appa.ied for and granted, lightinq of signage
for subjoct property shall be prohibited betweon the l~ours of midnigr.t
and 6:30 a.m. as specified by 2oning Code ;oction 18.05.A91.052
"Limitations on Sign Liqhting"„
5, That subjecL propexty ~:~a11 be devQloped substantially in accoxdance
with planss and specifications on f.ile with the ~i~y ot Anaheim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
6. That pri~x• to is~uaiice of a building pgrmit, or within a period of ona
~1) y~ar from th~ date o~ this resolution, Nhic2iever oacurs first,
Condih_ion Nos. l, above-mentianed, shall be complied with. Extensions
for furt-}ier t.fine to comnleke said condiCxnns may be granked in
accorclance with Section 18.U:3.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code,
°2' PC89-19
, ~ ~,.
~;~
,•'~
?
~~1
.~
F1.
Y
.. '~~ ,j.'n.'F,7:~
~~~
~
d'~4
7. That pr3or to F~,nal building and zona.i~g inspectians, Condition 27os. 2, 3
and 5, above-mentionecl~ shal], be complied with.
8. ~'ht~t approval af this applicatic,n cons~itutes approval of the pxoposed
roquest only to the Qxt;er~t that it complies with t.hQ An.ahoim Municipal
zoning Corae an.d any othar applicable Citx regula.t3ons. Approval daes
not inc.lud~ any action or ~izid.ings as to compli~nce ~r approv~l o:E the
request regarding any other applicabla ordinance, regulation or
roquirement.
BE IT FURTHER R~SOLV~D that t.he Anaheim Citx Planning Commiss3on
does heroby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon apglicant's compliance with each and all of tha conditions
2~ereinabovs set forth. Should any such conditions, or any ~art L•hergaf, ba
declared invalid or urienEorceable by h_he final judgment af anp court of
competen~ jurisdiction, then L•his RPSOlution, and any approvals hQrein
contained, shall be deemed nu11 an8 v~id.
TFiE FOkEGOIN'G RE^aOLUT.ION is $.1CJ11QC~ and apprc,ved by me thia 16th day~
aE January. '1989.
, ~,
- ~.,:'~: , 'lc:i.:,~1~!~'~''`-~~'-~
CHAIRWOMA~T, ANA~Fi~EIM CITY PLANNING CdMMISSTON
A~TEST: ~
_ ~ ~~~;~ k. ,
-----,~ ~° -.~ ~
uECRETF~RY, ANAFIEIM CIT'.~ PLArJNIhG COhfMISS~ON
STATE OF CALIEORhIA )
COUNTY OF ORA.NGE } ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Editih L. Harris, S~cretary of the A.naheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby cprti£y t2iat the foregoing rosolution was ~assed ~nd
ada~ted at a meeting of the AnatiQim City Plannix~g Commission held on Jz~nuary
16, 1989, by the Eollowing vote of Y.he members thereof:
AYES: COt~tISSI0NER5: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, CARU5TLL0, FBLDHAUS, HERB5T
MC EURNEY
NOES: COMMTSSIONERS; NONE
ABSENI: COMMISSIONERS: MESSE
IN N~ITNF,SS WHE~EOI', I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of
January, 198a.
~0627r
----_ `~.~.~ _~ ~ /
SECRETA~2X, 1NF.HEIM CtTY PLANPII~IG COMMISSIOt1
-3•-
PC89-19
~~~
~;1+
~
,, ~~.,;.~~.~~~~