Resolution-PC 89-217~ ,
~','~,,.
RESOLUT:I~N_tJQ.. PC~Q=,2],7
~ ~ ~.~~
~au~ar~ ":;~
A Rk;SOLUT:[ON OE' THE AN'.AHEIM CITY PLAN'NING COMMISSION
TFIAT PETI'.~ION FOR CONDITION.AL USE FERMIT N0. 3189 H~ GRANTED
,~ ;
WHLRuAS, the Anaheim City Plaxzning CommS.ssion did receive a verified
Petitiun for Conditional Use Permit frpm FVE;RET'T I-I. MILLER~ 270 RoycrnEL
A,venue, Lcng Beach, CA 90803, nwner,. and Ii~NI EL HAJ, 2~331 Bluffs~de, #305,
Huntingtoxi fieach, CA 92646, agent L•or certain real property situated in ~he
City of Ar.aheim, County of Orange, Stste c,f Califarnia, descr:.bed as:
THE NORTH 11Q.C0 FEET OF tHk; SOUTH 310.00 FEET OI' THE
PlEST 2p0.00 FEGT GF THF SOUTA'Yd,:ST QUAFtTER OF TIiE
SOUTfWEST QUARTER OI' SECTION 17, TOWN~HiF ~1 SOUTH,
range 10 WEST, IN TFIG RAI~CHO LOS COYOTES, CITX OF
ANAH~IM~ COUNTY OF ORANGE, S'!'ATE O,i CALIFORNTA, A.S
SAID SECTIqN TS INDI~CATED ON A MAP RECORL~I~D IlI BO~JK
52, PAGE 10 OF MzSCELL•ANEUUS MAPS TN TH~ OFF:[CE i~F
TFiF C~UNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WF'iEREAS, thQ Cir.y Planning Commission did bolc~ a public heari:ng at
the Civic Cer~ter ~n the C~~y of Anaheim oi~ AugusF 28, 1989 at 1:3G p.m.,
notice oE said public. he~aring havinq been duly given as revuired by lavr and in
accordance witY~ the provi.sions of the Anaheim Munici~~al Cz•ide, ChapL•er 18,03,
to hear and consider evidence for anii against said Z~roposed conditional use
permit and to investigate and make £indings anct recommen3ations in c~nnection
therewith; and
WHEF~EAS, said C•mmission, after duF inspectian, anvsstiqation and
study made by itsel~ and in 5.ts behalf, an3 aFter due considerati.on oE aZ1
evidence and repor~s offored at said hearing, doe:, find and determir~e the
f.0110wirig faCts:
1. That the pe~iY.ioner requests approval cf a conditional use
permit undar. autlz~rit;y of Code Section 18.44.050.135 tn permit an $-unit:,
5,U4U sq.f t. commc~rcial retail conter:
2. 'rhat the ~roposed u~g wi11 not adversely aFf.ert thc~ adjoining
land uaes and the qrewth. ~nd development of tho area in ~,rhich it is pr~posed
to be lucated.
3. That th~ size and shape aF the site prUposed tor the use is
adegunte to a11ow the Pu11 devc~J.opment of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particula: area nor to the peace, health, safety 3nd
general welfara of the Citizens nf the Ci~y of Anaheim.
4. That the granting of the Conditiona]. LJse Permit under t;he
conditions impnsed, if any, will not be detrimei~k:al to tho peace, health,
safety and gener.al welf~re oE the Citiz~n~ nf tho City ot Anahaim.
5. That the traffic generated by the propased use wi11 not ~.mposa
an undue burden upon the st~^eets and highwavs designed and improvQCi to carry
thQ traftic in the ar~:a.
7.022r -1- PC09-217
r ~. .,s.,.., . . ..... y . . . . . . . a ~ ~ ~ ~ { ~ .. . . . ..
~ . .. . . . - .. ~ . ~ ~I !`~ (~
H`1''r.;y
: ~ .':1
'~i
F• That no one indicaL-~d their presence at said ~ublic henrin i
opposition; and that no correspondence was rdc~ived in o ~ n
subject petition, pposition to the
CALIFURNIA ~NVIRONMF,NTAL
; City Plannin --~1LALIi~ Af,T FYNDIN~: xhat the Anaheim
~ porr,iat sn 8-unit,
~ 504~-square foot commerC al retailVCenrPr or~e a~re~tanlularl _
y shaped ~arce1 of
land consisting of ~pp1oximatQly 0.35 acre having a frontage oF ap~roximntely
' ~10 fee~ on tho east side of Brookhurst Street,
ap~roximate1y 140 fee~ ~nd being located approxima ely~2pp te~t no th of the
cQnterline oE Ball Road and furthor describad as 944 Soutri Drookhizrst Street;
anci does hereby apprc~ve the Negative Declaratzon u on findin
considered the Negative Declaration togekher with ~ a~ `, y that it has
during ihe ~ublic revi~w process and furth~sr finding on t~ e basisr oFlthe
initial study and aay comments receivQd that there is no substantial evidencF
that the project will, have a signiFicaxih. eF~a~t on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESO'uVED i:ha~ tho Anaheim
Cammission does hereby grant subject Petition for Coiic,.i.tiona1 lUse pPPrmitg
iipo~i lhe following condi~ions which ara hereby found to bc~ a necessary
prpi~quisite to the prop~sea use of the subject property in order to preserve
thc~ safety and general welfare of the ~xtizens of the Cii.y oE Anaheim:
* 1• that ~rior to issuance of a buildir~
signal assessment fee shall b~ g p°rmit, tl~e appropriate traffic
amount as est,ablished by City Cou cil.~resolution ity of A~aheim in an
W• Tha~ Ch~ existing driveways on Bz•c,okhursG S~reet sriall be remove
replaced with standard curb and gu,tter and sidewalk. d and
3• That the driveway on BrookPiur~t Street sha11 be constr.uctad with ten
(10) foot radius curb returns a~ required b
canformance w.ith ~;ngineering Departrn~nt Standard Nohel3~ ty ~ng~nQer in
* 4• That fire sprinklers sha11 be ins~~lled as required by the Cit,y Fire
Deparlment,
* 5• That subject pxoperty shall bQ served by unr3er~qraurid utili~ies.
* 6~ That no
pzepar~,d-food ser.vice far.ilities (restaurants
permitte~ in this commercial rek~i.l center ~ gha11 b~
parkincy~ 3s a~provad hy tlie City Council, P~.anr~ ng Corrun ssianior ~Zoning
acLnini:,trator or sutfic.ient Ca~le pxrking is provided.
~~• That tra~h storage ar~as shall be providea and ma.iutained in
location acceptable to the Street Maintenance And Sanitation Divisi~n
and in accorclance with xpproved p~.ans on file with said T~itrisian.
Such information sha11 be specifically shown on the pTans submit~-a~
Eor k~uildiny permits.
-2-
~~~
sll
,@
~
,_,',"'4r~~ ~ ~~t
r i 5
* 8, That all nlr condition3ng f~ciliti.es anc] other roof and ground mountiec~
e~uipment sht~ll be Qruperly ahielded from view, a~1d the sound btifC~re~1
fram ~adjncent ros3donCial proporties. Such inEormation qhall.
apeci~ically be shown on the plans submittocl Eor buil6inq permits.
+~ 9, Tliat the pr~posal aha11 comply wlth all siqning requirements of the CL
"Commercial, Lir~itod" Zone, unless a variance ullowing ~ign waivers is
approveQ by th~ C3ty C~uncil, Planning Commfasion or Zoning
Adm.inistrator,
* 10. That ~ six (6) foot hiqh masonry block wall sh»11 be maintained alang
the ~ast proporty line.
].1. That any proposed parking are;~ lighting f,ixtures adjacent L•o any
residentissl properGy shall bo down-lzghtod with a maximum he~ght of
tw~:ve (12) feet. Said lighting fixturas shall bo dirocted a~ray from
adjacen~t re~idential property llnes to prota~t the residenL•ial
into~rir! of rhe area and sha~, be indicuted on th~ plans ~ubmitted
Lor building permits.
* 12. That the on-sito lan3scapinq und irriqation systam shall be maintained
in compli~nce with City standards.
13. xhat Lhe orrner uf subject property sha11 submit a letter requesting
tormination of C~nditi~nal Use Petmit No. 3fi to tht~ 7.oninq Division.
19. That 3ubjack property shsll be devoloped substantially in acr.ordl~ r
w~th plan~ and specific,ati~ns submitted to the Ciky of Anaheim by the
petitioner and which ar~ on file with the City marked L~xhibit Nos. 1
through 4.
15. That prior to issu~:~ce oE a building uermit or vithin a period of one
(1) yo~r frum Che date of. thi.s resolution, whichever c.curs first,
Co~iditior- Nos. 1, 7, A, 11 and 13, abQVe-monti~ne~l, shall be complfed
wi.th. Extonsions for further time to compl~te said conditions may be
granteQ i.n acr.or~]ance witki Soction 18.03.090 ot the Anahefm Mu~icipal
CoOe.
16. That prior to final buildir~q and zoning iT~spoar.ions, Condition Nuu. 2,
3, 4, 5 and 14, above-menkionoci, sha11 be r_omplied with.
* 18. That approval ot thia a~plicatiun constitur.c~a Anproval ot the Qroposec~
roquest onty to the extent that it complios with the Anat~eim Muni.cipal
Zoning Codo ~nd any other applicabie C3.ty, Stat;e and F~tderal
requlations. Approval does not includn any action ar findings aa to
complisnce or appr~va~ of Chc~ r~rquest regarding any uther applicable
ordin~nce, regulatior~ or requiremant.
* I9. That th~ pracading conditions r-hich are marked r+lth an asterfrsk (~)
are required b,y established Iaws. Co9ea, rogulotions anU/or aqraements
nnd, therefoze, are i30T gul~joct to nr~gotiatioz+.
..~-
PC89-22.7
Y[~ ~ P
~a r'M,~t~~~~l
~„~
; ; ; ~`~
~
+ ~ .,. ~ , /n~
- __. _ ~ ~. v . . . . . . . . ~ ~ .. . . . ~, .. . .., . _ ... . ..t .1:.'.'~~it .J4\~Yf.~~
p (
• .
~~~~
n11i~'lr}
~
, ,~+.tu n
i h~ ,
F
,
r~+
,'r f
AE IT ~URTHER I2ESOLVED that the Anahei.m Ci.ty Planning Commiasion
does hereb!~ find and determine thaG a~aption af this Resolution is expressly
preciicated upon applicant'~ compliance with each and a1]. Qf the coaditions
hareinahovo set Eorth. Should any such candiLiuns, or an,y part thereof, be
declared invalic~ or unoi~forceable by the t3nal judymont uf any court o.E
cumpetent ;juriadiction, rhen this Resolution, and ~ny approvals herein
contained, shall be deemod null and ~o3.~t.
TH~ FAREGOING ftCSOLUTIGN is ~iqned ~nd appxoved by me thi.s 28th day
of Auyusr, 1989. ; " •~
'`~-~.,~~' ,, _' / _,, ~. __ __.._
CHAIRMAN„ ANAHEIM CI ~PL7~NNING COMMISSION
ATTES.: _
__._- ~~a~ _~~~ ~ __
S~CRETAR , ANAFIETM CITY FLANNING COMMISSTOT.~
STATF OF CALIFOR27IA )
COUN'rY OF ORANGE ) sE.
CITY 0~ AHAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secrntary of the Anaheim ~:ity Planning
Corronission, do hereby ~Qrt.ify that th~ forego3ng resolution was passed and
adopted at a meet3ng oF the Anahsim Ciry Planning Commissi.on hela on August
28, 1989, by the following vote of the members th~reof:
AYES: COh4~fISSIONEkS: HEkBST, BOYDSTUtl, FELDHAUS, HOUA,S,
yfC BURt7EY
'tIOES: COMMISSIONL~RS: NONE
ABSE~IT: COinMISSI0NER5: HELLYER, MESSE
IN WITNESS WEiEREQF, Y hav~ hereunto set my hand th3.a 28th day of
August, 19a9.
--- ~~~~._`'=~~'~'~'u.~.'- --
SE(:R~TAR ', .1t~AFIEIM CITY PX.1-N~..NG COA1MI55i0N
-4- PC89-217 '0
~,