Resolution-PC 89-221, . . . ..~ar~k.'4
..~ ~
F~ "~ZSCkLK .a + QA~~~`e Y~~.~
A RESOL1t~I02~ OF THE ANAHEIM CITY' PLANNING COMMIS5ION
THA'r PETITION FOR IlECGASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-05 RG GCtANTED
W13EREAS, tha Anaheim C3ty Pl~nniiYg Cammigsion. did recaive a
veri~ied pe~ition for Reclassificati~n from ANN MA1.2Iti GURROLA AND AN'1'ON'IO N.
GURROLA, 7155 S. Staha Collogo Houlevard, Anaheim, CA 926~6, owners of
cartain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, C:ounty of Orange, St~~td
of Culifornia, dosc•ribed as followss
LOT 117 OE TRACT N0. 2205, Yrr 'THE CITY OF ANIIFIET~S,
COUNTY 0~ ORANGE, S7.'ATF OF CALIE'OItNIA, AS SHOWN ON A
MAP THERBOF RECORDEU IN BOOK ti9, PAGES 33 TO 35, OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE CQUNTY,
CALIFORNIA
'r~HEREAS, the Ci~y Planning Commissi~n did hold a public hearinq
at ttie Civic Centar in the C.i~y of Anaheim on September i1, 1989 at ].:30 p.m.,
notico of said public hearing having boen duly given as requirotl by ~aw and .~n
accordanco with tho provisions of the Aiiaheim Municipal Code Chapter 18.03, to
hear and cansider e-,-idence L•or and against said propoced reclassification and
tc inves~igate and ~oake findings and rec~mmendations in conneckion therowith;
and
WHEREl.o. ~aid Commission, af.t~r dua inspection, inv~stiqation
aiid study made by itself z-nd i:~ i~s bQhalf, and after ~iue consider~tion of all
evidence anft reports aftec•~d a~ saicl hearinq, does find and detorminQ tha
folloWing Eacts:
1. That the petiti~ner requns~s reclassification of su~~joct
property from the RS (7200 ~C Residenr.ial, Single ~'amily Zone to the CO
(Cortunercial, OfEicQ and Profe~ssional) Zone.
2. That the Anahefm General Plan dessignates subject pr~perty
tor commercial profQSSional la~ncl us~3.
3. Tliat the proposed rvcla3sificarion of svbjact ~~perty is
neeessary anc3/or ciesirable f:or the orderly and propor devolopmeut of the
community.
4. That tt~e ~ro~osnd reclassifiaatiou of e~ubject property does
praperly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally e~tablished in
clo~o proximity to sub ject property and L•o tha~ zor.~:+ antf their p~:~ritted u~es
qeneral.ly established throuyhout the ~ommunity.
5. ;hal: the pcopo~ecl reclasslficatinii of subject propert~
requires the dedicas;ion nnd improvoin~nt ot abucting streets 3n acc:orclance with
tt~e C:rr~~lation ~lemsnt of ttse Genoral Plan, <i~~~ r.u thd anticfpated increarie
in trafii.c: Yrh.trn w:2~ bo genorato9 by the intenRi€ic~tion ~f land uae.
1033r -1- 1~C89-221
~ , ~ ~- , ` t . ti~.~:~,+r~ ~~~~~
, . - .. . . . -~~~' . . . pt ~p,_~{r 5 It~±,r^y~ n~ ~u
- ~ ' ~ ~~ . ~ ~M~.
11NM~M
~a';i~+'~~
6. That no one indicated their preserice at suid public heari.ng in
opposil;ion; an~ that no corrospondonry wtts reeeived in opposition to subjoc~
petition.
~-.~'..~~Q.~~A-- ~~V-I-Fs.4~.E~TI~L ou1~G~x~ A~~_. FINZ?~~: Th~C the An~sheim
Ci.ty Planning Commi;~sion has reviewed thK prop~sal to reclassify subjACt
pr~perty from the ItS-7200 (Residential, Single-F~n~ly) zone to the CO
('Cammercizl, OPfice and Professional) Z~ne and to p~rmit the affice use far
rc~sident3al structure wit}i waiver of maximum utructural haight on a
roctanqul.Rrly-shnpecl parcel of land conaisting of a~pr~.ximately 0.13 acre,
having a frontar~e of appr.oximatoly 60 fQet on the wRSt sic~e o~ S~ato Coll~ga
Boulevard, tiaving a meximum dopth of approxim~-~aly ,:00 feet, bein~ loaaked
approximately 170 feet s~uL-h of the cQnteriine of Savoy Avenue and further
describc~d as 7i5 South State Coll~ge ~oulevardt and doas herr~by aggrove the
Negativo Aaclflration upon Pinding tha~ it has considered the Negsti~~e
Declaration togethar with anp comments receiv~d cluring the pub.lic review
procesa and further Einding on the basis of the initial atudy and any
comments receivecl ths~t thore is no substantial e~~idonco tha~ the project wi11
h~.ve n signific~nt affect on tk~e environmonr_~
NOW, THEREFOP,F, BE IT RESOI.VED tlint the Anaheim City Planning
Commission d~QS hereby ycanr. subjQCt Pekition f~r Reclassification and, by so
doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim iNunicipal CodQ bQ amended to
exclude th~ ebove-describ~d property frnm L•he RS-7200 (Resfdentia].,
Single-Farnily) Zone vnd ~o incdrporate said descr.ik~Qd ~property into the CO
(Commercfal, Office and Profesaional) ZonQ upon tho f.ollowin~ conditions
which aro hereby found ~u be a nacessaxy prer~quisite to the proposed use of
subject property in ordor to preserve the saCety and general welfz~r@ of tr.R
Citizens of L-hc~ City of Anaheim:
~ 1. That the leqal owner of subject propert. s}iall irrevocably offgr to
dedicate to thQ City nE Anaheim a strip of land fif~y three (53) feot
in width from the ceTxterline of t1~e street nlong 5tate Colleqe
Doulevard for street widQninq gurposa~s,
* 2. That a fee st»11 be paid to tho City of Anah~.im for stro~t lightinq
along State Collerye Boulevard in an amount ac established by City
Council rosolution.
3. That prior tn the fntroduction of an ordinance rezoning aubjecC
propQrty, Cundih.ion Nos. 1,3nd 2, abova-me~tionod, sball be completod.
mhe ~rovisions or rfg}it3 grantied by this resolutioa sh~l.t b~come nu11
an~i void by action of the Planninq Commission unldss said conditions
are complied wfkh within onc~ (1) ycsar frorn the date of this reso,lu~ion,
or Juch further tima as tlio i~la~iniz~g ~ommiasion may qrant.
"'1• 7`hat a~proval of this applicati.on consCftut~s approval of the pr~poaed
request only to tho extant that it camplies with th4 Anaheim Munictpal
Zoniny CAde and any other applicable City, State anQ Foderal
roqulations. Approval aoes not inc.lude any action or fin4fngs as to
compli~sn~e or aPPra~~1 oE the rtlC~u35t regardi.ng any other app].icable
ordinance, reguletfon or requicement.
~~ PC89-~21 K.
~::~:..
- _ . : „ua
.
~
r
~
~ ,, ,.~~~ {t,~,~a~ti ~",~`~'
s,;,a~
Furthar, con83tioixs marked wiCh an ssteri~k (*) ~ro r~quire~ by
establfshed laws, codc~s, regulaGiona and/or a,qreements, and are not
s~.~bject to n~qutiation.
R~ IT FURTF~ER RESO!~VSD that the Anahei.m C:Ity Planning Commisaion does
hereby Eind and ddtermine that ada~tion of this Ro3olur3on is axpressly
predicated upon apelic;ant's compliance w3th each and a11 of tha ~anditions
hezeinabovo sot Eorth. Sh~uld any suali conc]itions, or an~ p~rt thereof, be
doalarod invati.d or unenforceab]~ by the final judcJmant of any court of
competent jurisaiction, L•hen this Resol~ition, and ~ny approva2s herein
cont.ained, shal.l he deemed null an~l void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIAN is signod and approved by me this l~th day o~f
Sdptember, 1989. ~, j
--~-e--C~--~- ` .~, .~ _ 'r~ ;+,.1 .~~._.._~__.~~
. CI':AIRMAN, AN~EIM IT.Y PLANNING CQMMISSIOrI
ATTE.~,T :
C. ~~ . ~~ I
,,
- ~ ~ _„~ ` rr,~/Li~r~-~. -
SECRETAR'Y, ANAFiEIM CIT1 PLANNING COMMISSfON
STAT~. UF CI-Y.,IFORNIA )
GOT]NTY OF QRANGE ) ss.
CITt OF ANI-FiEIM )
I, Fdith L. Fiarr:is, Secretary of the Analieim Cily Planning Commission,
Qo horeby certf f.y that the foregn.i.ng resolution wa.s paos~3 and adopted at a
meetinq of the Anahpim CiL•y Plann.tny Commission helcl on September 11, 1989, by
tbn following votQ of the members theroof:
AYES: COM~t~SSTONER5: HERD&T, BOYD5TUN, HELL'lFR, BOUAS,
MC BURNE•t, MESSE
NORS: COIr4~ISSIQNERS: NONE
ABSENTs COI~tISSIONERS: FE~DIiAU5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havQ h~rQUnto set my hanii this 11t:~ day of
Septombor, 1909.
- ~ • ( cY ,. `~ ,
_______-._..~, c~1~~~• 1 ~..:~"~ ~L~-~~~' -
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLAtiNING COMMISSION
-3- PC89-22l.
. ,';',
:,
_:~