Resolution-PC 89-222! f .... ! ~41~~, ~1i,~'S', 1 ~ . ~.~:~~ . ... ^'.iil~~ ~tll ,~~'.~rV t~41 ~:~'y'jN~ :+:k ..~:Ml ~ ,m y~ ~
1. . . 1.. .. . .. .. ) £~ !f4 iis .is;.1~, ~ ~it':(~7Jt'IrJ~ti S~i~k1 ;~~y~A~~~F~'h'
I I~~'+ S~'~. '.~~~ 1..
•1 ~S
~~h~'.eil+ ~fbK ~ .
` ' . ~ . ..',.,Y'
.13F~L ~'Z N NU~ P~.$~_227.
~ RESOL,UTION OF THE APIAHETM CITY PL.ANNINC COMMISSION
THAZ' ~E'rITION F'OR CONbITIONA~ USR P~EtMIT N0. 3190 B~; GRANTED
WHEREAS, tho Anaheim City Planning Corruni~sion dia recQive a va~rified
Petition for CondiCi~nal tTge perm3t trom ANN MARZE GU'RROLA AND ANTONJO 13.
GURROY,A, 7155 S. State College Houlevard, Anahc~im, CA 92686, owner~ of
certain real property situated in the City of. Anaheim, County ot Orange, Srare
of CaliPornia, de~cribed as:
LOT 117 OF TRACT N0. 2205, IN THC CITY OF IuTAHEIM,
COUNTY. OF ORANGE, ST~~TE OF CALIFORNYA~ AS SHOWN ON A
MAP THERF'OF 12ECURDED YN BOOR G4, PAGLS 33 TO 35, OF
MIS(:ELLANEUUS MAPS, RFCORDS OF SAID ORAI~GE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA.
WHERRAS, the Citx Planning Commission did hold a public heari:~g at
the Civic Cen~er in the City of Anaheim on September 11, 1989 at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of sai.d public hearing 2iaving been duly givan as required by law and iii
accordarice wi.th the proviyions of tha Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to haar and consider evide~nce for and against said propose~i conditional use
permit and to i.nvegtigate and make findings and rocommendations in connoctio:i
~herewi.th; and
~~~~A~. said Commission, afLer due inspection, invest3gation and
study made bl itse]f and in its behfllf, and after due con~iderati~n ot aIl
evidence and reports offered at saici hearing, does find and determir~e the
followinq tacts:
1. 7'hat ttie proposed use is properly one for which a conditional.
+ase permit is authorized by A:iaheim Municipal Code Section 18.41.OI5.03Q and
18.41.050.130 to wit: to per.mit the of~ice use oE a residential structure
with waiver of the fo]lowing:
S~CTI,,~N 1~~~..4~?:Qll - M xi ~m~.~4~'.lxrs2~_~i h3.~t.
(~ 2~ feot permitted when located 6.5 foet frnr~~
an i2S-7200 zone bouzir.~ary; ~ feet (to top of
parapet) existinq)
~. That the requegted waiver is hereby q= jnCgd Un the basis thut therQ
aro spocial circumstances appli~abl4 to the property such ns size, shapo,
topogrt~phy, loc~t.ion and surraundings which do not apply to ather i@entianll,y
zoned property in the same vicinitg~; ar~d that strict applicati.~n of tbe Zoning
Code deprives the property of privileges onjoyed by other properCiss in the
identical zone a»d classification in the vicinity.
3• That the proposad use r:ill iiot adversely affoct the adjoinin~ l~nd
uses and the growth and developmc~nt of thA area in which tt is propoc~ed to ba
located.
~. That the size and shape of the site ~ropoc~d for tho use is a8equate
to allou the full dovelopment of ehe Qroposed usa in a manner not de~ri.mental
to the pslcticular aroa nor to the peace, heal~h, sufety and general welfare of
the Citizens of the City ~f Anaheim.
1034r -1- PC84-222
; i',~t
~:~
~
~~ ~~ ~ '~~r;:
t,,~
5• Thrat ~he gra.nting ~~f the Condi't.ional Usa Pei~mit un~er the condiCions
im~osed, if any, w311 not be detrimenCal to the pt~ace, healr.h, 3afety and
gennral welfare of the Citixe~zis Uf thQ City of Anaheim.
~• That ~he traffic gen~rated bX thQ praposed usa will not impose an
unr~ue burden upon the str.e~Cs and highways designod ~nd .improved to carry the
traEfic in tho are~.
~• 'J.'hat n~ Qn~t indicated their nresenca at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspc~ndence was received in opposition to tlia
subject petition.
ALIF PNIA GNVIRONM'Efl~A_ L QUA I y A~x INpIh ; Tha~ the Anaheim
City Plar,ning Commission has rev.iewed ~he proposal to reclassify subject
pz•opax•ty from the R3~7200 (Re,idential, Single-Ft~milyj zone to the CO
(Commercial, OFFice anci Professional) aonp and ta limit tYse oFfice use of a
rPSidentiai structure with waiver oF inaxirnum strustuxal height on a
~ec~axagularly--shaped parcel of land consas~zng of approximately 0.13 acre
liaving a£rontage of approximately 60 fee~ on tk~g west gide of State Co].lege
Boulevard, }~aving a maximum depth ~t approxir;~atQly 100 foet and being located
approximat~ly 170 feeL south af the centerline o£ Savoy AvQnue and furthc-r
described as 715 South State Collego ~3oulovard; and does hereby approve the
Negative Declaration upon findinq zhat it has consid~erefl the Noqativ~
Declaration togethex with any comment~ r.eceived durinq the ~ubla.c review
process an~i furtliNr fi~ding osi the basis ~~f. tha iniCial study an~ any
comments received that there is no substs~nL•ial evidence tha1: the prajsct will
Yiave a significant effect on the euvironment.
I~'OW, TFI~REFURE, BE IT RESOL~VED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission cloes hereby grant subjRCt Petition for (:onditional Use Permit,
upon Che following conditions which a:e hereby f~und tc be a necessary
prerequisite to ktie proposed use o~ the subj~ct pruperty in ordor to preserve
the saEety and gener.al welfarQ of the Citizens ~P the City of Anaheim:
~• xhaL tkie new consCruction au~hor~.a,ed by thi3 resolution nha11 be
served by underground utilitios.
* Z• Tha~ prior to fssuance of a buxlding permit, a traffic signal
assessment feo e:~ualing the d.ifterAnce bettvaen the residenrial and
office assessmor-t fe~es shall be paid to the C.ity of Anaheim in an
amount as establfshecl by Cil:y Councll re~o].ution.
* ~. That fi.ro spc3nklers shxll be installed as reg~:ired by the City
Fire Departmont.
~ 4. That medical and/or dental office usP sha11 not be parmitL•ed unless
a vari~snco for parking is approved by the City Council, klanning
Commission or Zonfng Administrator or 3ufficient Code parkinq is
providr:d.
* 5• That tra3li stcrr~ge areas shall be provicled alid maintained in ~
.location accept~ble ~o the Street Ma.inkenance and Saxiitation
nivi~.i~n, and in ~ccor~3ance wit]i approved plana vn file wit•h said
L-iviaion. Sucb. information shall be specifically shown ou the
plans submitted for building permits.
'2 PC89-222
f~~!~+t'r 4 1'^'.~~,~ ~~ .~:;1'::~( l~ ~4.~~i!~~ f t ;'~tV T~ .. ,.
'i' . . . r ~_Y::~ , i rvu ~ . ~ ~ • ~,:6 ~~ t Ji.t~~,h ~ ~v„(
~~ 1, ~ . ~ .. . _ . .. .
G~
/ ~~ • •
dIN'.~.
i
i
* 6• That all air condikion3ng facil~.tiea and other rooE and ground
mounted equipmen~ ~tiall be properly shielded from view, an,cl the
sound buffered from adjacent rosidential properties. Such
an£ormation sha11 bo specifically shown on the plans submitted Eor
builc~ing permits.
* 7. That due to the
plai:a ~hall b change in usca and/or occuFc~ncy of ~he buildi.ug,
e
compliance wit:h submitted ko
the~ minim the Ruilding
• Divisi.on showing
urn ;,randax
ds of the
including t}iQ iJniform Building, Plumbing, R]
ect City of Anak~.exm,
rical
M
and FirR Codes as
adopted by the .
City o~ An~heim. ,
ecr,anical
The appropriato
permits shall be obtained for any necess»,ry work.
; ~ 8. That the proposal shall comply w3.th all signin~ r~r~uirement~ of tfie
CO "Commerr.i.al, Office and Professianal" Znne, unless a vaxiance
~ allowing : wai.vers is appruvEd by thp City Counci.l, P.lanning
Commission c ~ning AdminisL-rator,
. * 9. That a six (6) foot high masonxy block wa11. sh~ll be constructed
and maintained alonq thr: south prop~rty linA exaepting the front
setback wher~ tlie wa11 height sha11 not exceed khree
(3) feet;
providec.l, however, tYiat the Cxty TraEfic ExigineeL sha11 h~vQ ~he
authoriry to reduce the height oF the wall to pro~eat visual
line~s-of-szght where podestrian/vehxcular circulat3on in~ersecL•.
Said Wa11 sha11 be s~ecifically shown on the plans submitLed for
building permits.
10, That any proposod parking area lighting fix~ures adjacent to any
residential property sha11 be down-lig2xtc~d with a maximum hoight o~
twe~ve (12) fook. 5azd lighting fixturos shall bo direatod away
from ar9j~cent residential property linQS to protect the resident,ial
integrity of the area ~nd shall be indicatpd or~ t:he plans subm.itt~ed
for building psrmits.
11• That the on-site landscap3.ng aud irrig~tion system shall bQ
refurbished and mazntained in comglianca with City standards.
~ 1z. ~hat this Conditiona'1 T1se Yermit is granted subjecr to adopCion oE
a zoning ordinance in connection w.ith Reclassifi~arion No. 89-90-5,
now pending.
1'3. That subject propcsrty shall be developed subatantially in
accordance with plans and 3pocificat:ions suumitte3 to ~he City of
Anahefm bp the petitioner and which plans are on £i1Q witri tha City
markec3 Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
14. Tl~at priar to commencement ot the activity a~aL•hnrized by this
rasolution, or prior to iasuance nF a building permit, or within a
period of one (?) yEar Erom the date oF this resolutian, whichever
occura £irst, Condition Nos. 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 12,
above-menCionod, 3ha17. be r.o.npl~ed with. ~xtensions for further
time ko cumplete said condihions may be granted in accord~nce w.tth
Section 18.03.Q90 of the AnnhQim Municipal CoQe.
,`
-3-
M~
r~
~ , .~;~4,;ti.
,: ~:
';
PC89•-222
. ~;
:F~~
r;~4~~
~' ~;IS~ ~.~Y
pV ~
'1^"_ ".'.7
~ f~j~~
t,rli
~i J
~ .~~
rti
. ~ ~ . ~~. }'a
'~
15. That prior to the conunencemen~ of l,he activity authorized by this
resolution, or Einal builtling and zoning inspeai:ians, whichever
occurs ~irs~, Condi~ion Nos. 1, 3, 9~ 1'1 arid '13, above-m~nL•ionRd,
shall be complied with.
* lfi. That approval r~f this applicat.inn ~~onstitutas approval of the
proposed request only to the extar~t that it complic~~ wi*_h the
Anahei.m bSunicipa]. Zoning Cndo and an3r o~her appX.icable, City, State
and E'ederal regulati.ons . Approval. c~oes not S.nclude any aation or
findings as to compliance, or approval of the raquest regarding aziy
other applicabl.e ordinance, ragul&tion or requzrement.
~ k'urther, conditions marked with an asterisk (~) ~re required by
establistied laws, co~~as, regu].ations and/or agr~emeni:::, and are not
subject to negot9.~~ion.
IIE IT FURTIiER RG50LVFD that tha Anaheim City Pzanning Commiss3on
does hereby find arid determine thaL adoption af this Resolutioxi is expressly
prodicated upon applicant;'s compl~.ance wxth each and all of the conc~itions
hereinabove sot forth. Should any such conditi~ns, or any part ~hc~reoE, be
declarod invalid or unenforceable by the Einal judgmen~ of any Court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, nnd any appr~vala hor~in
conCained, sk:all be deemed nu11 and void.
THE I'ORGGOING RESOI.UTII~N is signod and apprqved by me this llth day
of Septembc~r. 1989., )
`•~,' { ` ~' Yl / ; :. ~ ,
~- •~ C:iA.TP.MAN, ANAHEI CIT't PLAldNING COMMISS70N
ATTF.ST: ;,
` ~ ' .
- .-~-~`~.'~-= ~=~~=~=------~-
SECRETARX, ANAHEIM CITY PLA2~TNTNG COMMISSION
STATE Q~ CALT.E'ORNIA )
COUNTY OF URA.NGE ) ss.
CITY OF I~NAIiEIM )
I, Fdi~h L. Harr.is, Secretar.y of the Anaheim City Plaaning
f.'ornmission, do hereby ce.rtif.~• tha~ thc~ foregozng reso'lution w~o passed and
adopted at a mQeting of the An.aheim ~ity Planning Commission held on
Se,pL•ember 11, 1~89, by the following vote oP the members thereof:
AYES: COMMI55ION~:RS: HERBST, BOYDSTUN, HELLYER, BOUAS,
MC BURNEY, MESSE
NOES: COt~ST5SI0N~RS: NQNE
ABSENT: COMMI5SION~RS: FRLDFIAUS
IN WITNE5S WHEREOF, I huve nereuntu sEt my hand ~hi5 11th day of
September, 198y.
` ___
~~ ~. ~? F. ~ '
_ ~-~~~a,
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM C:LTY PLANNING COMMISSIJN
-'~- PC89-22~ ,:~
,~
. ~ . ~ ~~~~~1~4
~~
1 ,"fi[~
. _ . __._. . . ~ ~ ~'.~7