Resolution-PC 89-227~ ,( ~
. V , ~~ ' ~ ~}~
• ~~ ~
_'; ~
RESOLUTIOTI N0, PCQ9-227,
A RE~OI,UTION OI' TIiE ANAH~IM CI'PY PLANNING COMMTSSION
THAT PETITION FUR RECLASSIFTCAT'tUN N0. 89-90-07 B~ GRANTED
WFiEREA5, L-he Anaheim City Planning Commission aid reaeive a
verified retit::on for Raclassificatinn from 2dARI~N HUCFTEYM AND ET.LE~N
WER`I'rELDER TRU'ST~ES, C/0 ICIRIC FTNLEY, 1a12 Nort.h Broac!way, Santa Ana, CA
92'IOG, owners, and OFE'ICE CLUB, C/0 DU*7ALD CHEW, 1631 Challeng~ Dr.ive,
Concord, CA 94520, agenL for certain roal property situated in the Cit~ of
Anat-eim, County of Orax-ge, State ~~f California, desc:ribed a~a Collowsa
THAT PORTION OF' TFI~ SOUTHEAST IJUARTER OF' TFIE
50UTHWEST QUA2:T~:R OF SFCTION 23, 04VNSHIP 4 SOUTH,
RAN'GE 10 WEST, IN THE RE;NCIiO SAN ~7tJAN t:AJON DE SANTA
ANA, A8 SFIOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN HOOK 51, PAGE i0
OF MISCELL,ANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CAT.~IFOR27TA, D~SCRTBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGTNNINv AT A POTNT IN THE CENTER LTN~ OF KATELLA ~
AVENUE 6A.00 FEET (BEING SpUTf~ LINE OF ;;AID SECTIOt7 ~
23) DISTAI~T NORTH E39 DEG. 57' 45" EAST 704.62 P'EET ~
FROM Z'HE INT~RSECTION ?'HEREGr WTTH THE CFNTER I,INE OF f;
THAT CERTA'tN 60 FOOT STdIP UF LA.ND DESCRIBED IN DEED
'10 THE STATE QF CALIFORNIA RECORDED JULY 10, 1914 IDT '
HOQK 258, PAGG 66 OF' DEEDS; TEIENCF NORTH 0 DF.G. 16' ,
~
,
50" W~ST A DISx'ANCE OF 599.11 FEF.T TO A POIN'P; 'CHENCE
NORTH $9 DEG. 43' 10" EAST TG xHE WESTERLY LI:NE OF '„~
THAT CrRTAIN 60 FOOT STRIP OI' LAND DESCRt$~D IN A~ED ~
TO SOUIHERN PACIFIC KATLROAD CO., RGCORDED MA~2CH 31, ,
1899 IN f300K h0 PAGE 268 OF DEEDS; THENCE SOUTHERLY ~'',
ALONG SAII1 WESTERLY L7NE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF S.aTD '~'
5ECTION 23; THENCE ALO11G THE SQUTH LINF OF SAIll ~I
SECTION 23, SOUTH 89 DEG. 57' 45" WEST TO THE POINT ~
~F BF~Gi~NZNr. t
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public nea.rxnr
at the Civic Center in the rity of Anaheim on Sept~mber 25, 1989 at 1:30 p.m.,
nata.ce of said gublic heariizg having been duly given as required by law and in
accurdance with the Provxsions of the Anahaim :~;;::zicipal Code. Chaptc~r .L8.03,
t;o hear and consider eviden~e for and against said prcposed reclass9.Fication
and to investigate and rtiake findings and recommendatinns in connectioil
therewith; and
WHEREAS, sai.d Commission, after due inspectio~.i, investzgation
and sL-ud}• ,nade by itself ancl in its be2.~alf, and af.ter iiue cons.iderai:ion of. a11
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, doRS f.ind ar.d determine the
following facts:
1048r
-1-
PC89-227
.':'r~
. , ;;;
~
!)~1 1
».i ++nhY
t}1'
~.. That the netitioner pr~poos reclasification o~' subject ~roperty
trom the ML (2nctustsrial, J.,imited) to the CL(Commerci.al, Limited) Zon~.
' 2. That the Anah~im General Plan clesignates subject property for
~f Business/Oit-ice/Service/Industr.ial Uses.
1
~ ;i. That the progosed reclassif9.cation of subject property i~
nec:essary anu/or desirable for the orderly and propor dovelopment of, the
•~ community.
4. That the proposed reclassification oi• subject proporty doRs
~ proparly relate to tl~e zones and their p~rmitted uses local.ly established in
~ clo;e px'oximity to subject property and to the zones and thair pormitted uses
} gen~rally established throughout the community.
`~~ 5. That th~ proposed r•ecla~si£ication of subject property requires
'~ the dedication and improvement of abutting s'~raets in acco:d~.nce with the
` CS.rculation :.'l~~ment of the ~enera:l Pl~n, due to the anticipatecl increase :in
:~! tr.affic which will be gen~rated by the intensification of: land use.
6. ThaL• no cue indicatecl their L resen.ce at said public hearinq in
opposition; and ~har no correspondence w~,s recQived in oppasition to subjoct
pPtztion.
~,AT,IFORNIA ENVIR• QNME,NTAL T ALITX ACT FINDT I: That the Anaheim
City Ylanning Commis~ion has revi.ewecl t2ie pro~osal to reclassify subject
property icom the ML (Industr:;.al, Limited) Zone to the CL (Commercial,
Limited) ZGns ~nd to retnin an existing Commercial retail use wirh w~iver of
minimum number uf parking spacc~s on a~z irregul.a.rly-ahaped parcel of land
consisting of approximately ]..19 ~cr~5 havi.ng a frontage oE approximatQly 277
feet on the north side af Katella A~~enue, having a maximum depth of
approximatQly 338, ancl being locate6 aprroximately 292 feet Qast o~ the
center.line of Claudina Way ~nd further described as 51T ~ast Katella Avanue
(The Office C'lub); and doas hereby a~prove the Neg[~tive Declaration upon
finding that it has aonsidered the Negative Dec].arati~n toqether with any
commen~s rece.ived during the public review~ process and further Einding an the
basis of thQ 3.nitial s~udy and any comments receive~ that there is no
substantial ovid~nce that tYie pr~jec.t will hav~ a significant cffect on Lhe
environment.
NOW, TFIEREF012E, BE IT RESOLVEll 'that the Anaheim City P].anning
Cammission does 2:ereby grant subject Petition ~or Reclassification and, by so
doing, that Ti~le 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Ca~e be amended to
excl«de '.:he above-described proparty from the tdL (Industrial, Limited) zone
ar.d to incorporate said described property intU r_he CL (Commercial, ~,imited)
Zone apon r_he following conditions which are hereby fou~d to be a necossary
prerec~uisite 1:o the p.rnposed use nf subject property in or~er to pres~rve the
safety and gener~l welfare of the Citizens of the Cit.y of Anahoim:
~~,~
,,
_2_
~„
~
~r
PCE9-227
''F:
_ il;)
%i
~ ~~ti
.,.... ~ ....~„+ ..s.uh~.~
1 s'~
~ ;'^w~~~"C''~ e , .1 ~;'k l rn.::. • ,~~~5 a
. . ~y~W~1
_ iR9.
r"'•1
. .`~;i
~5~
'~,~~,~.'..
~ ~''F
~ ~ . ~ ~ ;~r,'i
k
1. * ThaC plans ak~a11 bQ submittad showinq the proposed parkiny layout
Qasign ~oniorrtis tia the Enginooririg Uepartmont's Stc-ndard Plan tios. 902,
6~1, 602 ancl 604 por.taining to standard details ~:~:.r parking atructurss
and ramp re~uiraments.
2, * That trash storage areas sha11 bc~ provided and maintair.ec3 in a~oct+tion
~cceptal>>e to ttie 5tr.oet Mai.nr,on~nce and Sanitation Div3sion and in
accord.anco wich approved plans an filo witk- said Division. Said
stornge area sholl iiot be locatad 3n tho front setbACk are~ aclj~cent t4
Katella Ave~nue.
3. * Thas: pur5uant to Chapte~ 17.30 of T3tle 17 ~f thR Anaheim Municfpal
Code, a develc.pmenti £ee fo•c the Anaheim Sta~~fum Business Conter shall
be paid to i:he CiLy of Anaheim in ~n amoiint as dotorminocl by the Ci~y
C~uncil.
4. *~hac S~adium Are~ w~tar facilil•i~s toes and/or advances to the Water
Utility Division shall be paid in accnriiance wi.th Rule 15D oE the Wator
Jtility Rates, ~tules and Regulations.
5. That a traffic siqiial assessment fae equaling th~ clifferonco bQkween
the indu~trial and cnmmercial assessmont fees shall be paid to tho City
of Anaheim in an amount as e~:tablis?-ad by Cit•y Cuuncil resoli~tion.
6. That a11 air con8itioning f.acilitie~s and other roof and groun~. mounted
eqtiipment shall be pruperly shiQlded f.rom view.
7. That prior ~o the ihtroducti.on of. an c~rd.i.nanco reaoning 3t1bjQCr
property, Condition Nas. 1 through 6, above-mentioned,. shall be
completed. The provi.siona or r~qhts granted by this resolution shali
become null and void by acr,ion of tt~e Planni~ng Commission unless said
conclitions arQ c~mplied with wi~hin one (1) year fxom the date of tbis
re~olution, or ~uch further time as the Plar,ninr~ Commission may granC.
-3- E~C84-72`/
~
;r
~,
:~~,~
~~~ ...~ -_ ;~~
+,t' 1 • ''~ . . . _ . .. . . . . . - '. ' . . . ~''I.~ V.,f~~~y,:~
..~
~~
~•* That approval af this appl#cerinn cona~iti~tes a
r~~Ue~ti unYy to ~ho extez~ Chat it complies wfthptlhe~Anah~imeMunfa.ipal
Zoning Code and any ~ther apPl3c8ble Cit ~.
~ regulRtion9. Approval ~oes not; tnclude pn Y' ~tate an8 Fedoral
co~npliance or appxoval af the request regarding p~ y o erd~applicable
orainance, regulation or rac~t~irement.
Curther, ~onditions markc~d with an asterisk (+~) arp xQ u1xefl
I4~' es~abl~.shod laws, aodes
. regulations and/or uc~raements and are nor,
~' subject ~o negotiation,
HE IT FUItTfiER RESOLVED L•hat the Anahzi ~ City Planniny C~mmt:,~ion does
he=a~y find and determina ~hat adoption of this Resolutiun ~s expre~sly
predacated upon applicant's comp].iance with each and all of the conditions
; he.reinab~ve 301: forth. Should any such conditions, or an
; declareci invalid or unen.forcouble by the final judqmentyo.Ear nyhcourt~ ~f
; com~etent jurisdiction, th~,n this Resolution, and an•
conta.ined, sha11 k~e deomed n~,:ll ancl void, ~ apF~rnvals here3n
i
THE FOREGOING E2ESOLUTION i~ ~igned unci approved by ~e this 25th day
oF SeptQmbQr. 1989. /
i
i . ~
, , i ~~. ~)--
----~~.~,~~r l~' ~. ~~_..C••XLi' .___ .
CfiAIRMAN, ANAHEtM 6iTY PLANNIN ~COMMTSSION
ATTCST: ;~
...,. - ~
~ ~~
SECR~ ~ R . ANAHEF ~•-_ - ~~/l.~-s/
M CITY PLANNING COMMISSI011
ST'ATE OF CAI,IFORNiA )
COUN'fY OF ~~A.vGE ) gs.
CrTY OF ANANEIM )
I. Eclith i,. fiarris, Serra~ar Qf
Conunfsaion, do horeby certify tihat the forogoing Qre otl tfon was y P~'~nning
adopted at a mbeting of tt~o Anat~oim CiL-y Plenn3ng Commisaion lseld onpSeg embRa
25, 198g, by i;he fallowinq voCe og the members thereof:
AYSS: COMMZSSIONF,RSS HERliST, BOYDSTUN, HELL1t'ER, FEI~DI3AUS, J10UAS,
~ MES~E
NOES. COt~.fIgSIONERS: NONE
ABSEM!': CObAtISSI0NER5t MC DUR.NEY
IN ~VITt1EgS WNgggpF~ I have horeunto set my hand this 25th day of.
S~~Ptember, 19fig,
/~ ,./ ,~
_ _ _._____ _._ .>-L~~~___.~/ `~
SECRF,~T1~EtY, 11IiAHEIM CITY P:,AtJNI~ ISSIUN
~~~
PC89-22 %
~~1A
S~
?,~
I)
~.:}
. ' .~.~~`,I
5
i