Resolution-PC 89-2374j ,_ ., . , ..
J, ~
,i
~
~~~~
. .. S ~:'. 11~'~,rl~
,~
.!' iA
,.~I
i:~~
. . . ~._',~ii5
RESOLiITI0t1 NQL P~'~,~2~
A.R~SOL•UTTUN OF TFI~ ANAHEIM ;,'ITY PLANNING COMMYSSION
THAT Y~TITION FOR RE~LASSIFICATION N0. C9-40-18
F3L GRANTED, AS MOnTFT~D
~~ ;
m-
WHEREAS, tho Anaheim CiY.y Planning Cummissioi~ did rscaive a
veri~ied petitior~ for Reclassification from GEORGE ANll EVA SICILIANI, 3024 E,
I~a Pa1ma Avenue, Anaheim, CA 9280ti, c,wners, and ROHERT G. MU11~, 1373G
Goldenwesti Streat, Suite C, W~3tminster, CA 926a3, agsnt Eor. certain real
property sitvated in tYie City of Aii3hPim, Count•y of. Orangs, State oE
California, descr.ibed as £ollows:
xHE NORTH 120 FEET OL' THE WEST 180 FEE~ OF 1'HE
*10RTHWRST QUAR'PER Of TFiE SOUTHTrVEST QUARTEx OF THE
SQUTHWEu~ QUARTEF UI' SGCTION 7, IN TOWNSHIP 4 SOUSH,
RANG~ 9 W~SZ, SAN AERNARDINO BASE AND r;ER?DlAN, IN
THE CIiY OF ANAI~EIM, COUNTY OF (7Rl.NG~, SrATG 0~
CALIFORNIA
WHER~AS, the City Planning Commission did hold a p~ublic hearing
~ at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on OC~ObQl 9, 1989 at 1:30 p.m.,
notir,e oE said publi.c h~aring havinq been duly givQn as requirod by law and in
: ttccordance with the provisions of Lho :~nahoim Municipal Code Ch~pter 18.Q3, to
hear and conszder evidence for and 2~gaxnst said propoaed r~cYassifical:ion and
to investagaL•e anct make find.ings anr.1 recomrnendations in connection therewith;
and
F1HER'r".AS, saic4 Commission, after due irlspection, investig~tion
and study made by itself and in its beh71L, and af•ter due consideralion of a11
evidence and reports oEfered ~t said hearir.g, doss find and determinA tho
following facts:
.L. Th~t the petitior,Pr proposes reclassiEication of subjoct
property from thQ Kti-A-43,OG0 (Residential/Agricultural) Zone tio the CL
(Commercial, Limited) 'Lone; however, the Pl~n~ning Commission detexminod that
reclassificatiun to the CO (Cammc~rr,ial, Office and Professional} Zo:~e wouYd be
more apprupri.ate.
2. That t•ho Anaheim General Plan designates subaoct property
for Low Density Resz~ential land uses; however, adjacent properti~s to tho
north are designateci for commarcial professionaY land s~se~.
3. 'That the approved reclassificntion of subject pxoperty is
necessary and/or tosirabl~ for the orrlerly anfl pr~per cievelopment ~f. the
cnmmuni.ty.
4. 'chat the propo~ed reclassification of subject proparty aoea ':~
propr~rly relate to thc~ zones and thair perm.itted uses locally estab:lished irt ~,;;
close proximity to subject• pr~perty and ~o the zones and their p~rmittod uses
qoneral].y established tY:rouqhout the community. ~~
5. That thP proposod reclassi~icati~n of subjeat property `.r
~;, requires the 3.mprovement of abutting streets In accordance with the '~
•,`,;; Czrcu]ation El.ament of the General plan, due to the anl•icipated increase in
`" traffic which wi11 be g~nerated by the intensification ~f land +xse.
t ~~
` 1066r -1- Pr 69-~37 :C?
~: , ~r
s~
~ , ~~~
,
~~~
~ yfr.
6. That one ~erso.l inciicated his presenae at sa3c~ public
hear3ng in opposit;iun; and that no car.respondencP was rc:neived in oppo~it3an
~o subj~r.t petition.
~ALIFORNIA _ENVIRUNMI:NT~-'L_Q_UALITY A~T FIPIDING: That tho Anaheim
City Planning Commissiori has reviea~ed tho pra~osal to reclassify subject
proporty ~Erom the RS-A-93,OOD (Residential/:~gricuXtural) Zone to the CL
(Commercial, Limited) Z~ne to p~rmit: office use ot a rQSidential structure
with waiver of permitted locataon of vehicle parking, mar.imum structural
hei7ht t~ud minimum setback adjacent to singls iamily rosidenti~zJ, zoning on a
rectangul~rlv-s~iaped parcel of land ~onsist•ing of a~proximaCely 0.41 acre
having a frontage of approximately 126 feet on the oast sitQ of Rio Vista
Streer, having a maximurn depth of approximaLely 15U feet, being located
approximatel~ 270 feQt south o.f Lhe cQnterline of Lincoln Avenuo and furthor
described as 502 South Rio Vi.sta S~reet; anci docs hereby approve the Negative
D~claration upon finding that it has c~nsidQred the Nogativs Daclaration
together w.i.th any comments receiv~d during the pubJic revi~w procass and
iurther findin~ on the basis of Lhe initial study and any comments received
that there is no substar.tial evic?ence that the project w.i11 have a
significant effect on tha euvironment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE50LVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Cummission does hereby grant su~ject Petition for Reclassi~ication, a3
modif.ied, t~nd by so doing, that Title 18-e^.oning of the Anaheim Municzpal CodQ
be amended L-o exclude the above••describad property from the R5-A-43,000
(Residential/Agrici~ltural) 'Lone and to incorporate said described pr4pert~
into the CO (Commercial, OL•fzce and Professional) Zone upon ~:ie followin~
ccnditions which are hereby found to be a necPSSary prer.equisite t~ the
proposed use of su;~ject pr.operty in order to preserv~ thP safety ax~d general
wslfare ot the Citizer_s of the City of Anaheim:
1. That ~treot lighting faciliti.es along Ri.o Vista Strec~t sY:t~ll be
installed as requa.red by Che Utili'ties General NianagQr in accordance
wi.th specific~tions ~n file 5.r~ Che Office of Utilitzas General Managar;
~r that security in the for;~n of a bo:~d, certificate o~ deposit, 1Qtter
of credit, or cash, i.n an F-mount an~~ form sat.isfactory to the City of
Anaheim, shall be postPd with the Cit;y ru guarantee the satis£actory
completion of the above-menLioned i.mprovesnents. Said security shall be
posted with the Cil-y ot Anahaim priur• to the introduction of an
ordinance rezor~ing subject properCy. The abnve-r.equzred improvemen~s
shall b~ installed prior ta ocaupancy.
2. That the logal owner of subjc~cL• property shall dedicate to the Ci~y o£
Anaheim a st:rip oF 1anc~ six (6) F~et in width located along the north
property line ~f subject property Por puY,lic utility purposes.
3. That a fee sha11 be paid to the City of Anaheim tor tree planting along
Rio Vis~a Street in ~n amount as established ~y City Council resolution.
~. That prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezaninq subject
property, Conditzon Nos. 1., 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall be
c~mpleted. Ths provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall
become null and votd by action of the Planning Commissiun unless said
canditions are compliQd with within onc~ (Z) yoac from the d~zte of this
resolution, oL• such further time as the Planning Commission may grant.
;~ ,
,-;
-2~ Pc ag-z37
~,t~.,::. ,., _
, , ,:„,,;.
~~'~;R~; . ,.
~ ~,,, . ~ ~~~~t~ ~
, ~ ~~
~; , ,
5• That approval oE L•his applicat.ion c.onsLitute~ approvai n~ ~h
r~quest only to the extent: r.hat it complies with the Ax~aheim Munic~sal
Zoning Code and any other applicable Ca.t
regu1ations. A Y• State and Federal
pproval doos noC includo any ac~ion or ~,indings as t•o
I`,' c~mpliance or approval oE the roquest regarding any Qth~~ ~
orclinance, regul~tiorl or requiremen~. PPgxcable
~`~~>~ BE TT FURTH~R RFSOLVED
~`•~ does hereby find and detQrmirie thathadopt onAof thisCResolutionnis~e~r~s1~~,
~~•,' predac~atQd upon applicank's comp7iance xith each and a11 ~f the condit'
hereinabave set f.c,rth. P S~1
der.lared invalid ur unexi ~r~eab~e ~ ~h conditions, pr z~ lpns
competei~t jurisdicti~n, y~r~ final y p~rL rhEreof, be
thsn this kesolution, ~a ~ n t °~ anY court nt
~' contain~d, sha11 be deemod nual and voia.
y aPPxovals herein
~HE I'GRF,GOING RESOLUTTON is signed and approved by me th5.s 9th da
'~' of October, 198g,
~J ~ ~~ , i. Y
,:,~ i, / ~ L/ ~~
• ' ' r~ ~ - ~•~ ,.~~-,
~ ~--~HAIRMI~N, ,ANAHk;i CITY pLANNI C('N OMMISSIQN
„ ATTEST; _
----__ CiL~~=^"`.~ ~
SECI2ETA f, ANAFiE1'M CITY PL~IT~INING C01~1ISSSON
STATE OF CAI,IFORNIA )
COUNTY' pF ORANGE ) ss.
CI1'Y G~F A1VI~FiEIM )
~' ~'d~•t~ ~• Harris
Commission, a~ hereb- ' Secr~~arY og the Anaheim City Planning
adoptQd at a meetxn y Cex~lfy that Che foregoing resolution w~s passed ana
g of. the Anaheim City Plarini~g Commission held on October
g• •L989. by thP following vote of ~Pie members the.r~of:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ~iE~2F3ST, BOYnSTUN, H~LLYER, FELLHAUS, AOUAS,
NOES: MC PURNE`I
COMMISSTONERS; NpNE
?=T3SENT; COMMISSIONF.RS: MESSF:
!N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand tY:is gth ~a
Oc~ober, 190g,
y of
SECR .1'^`~~~ G"C. ,. ~
ETARY, ANAfi~;IM CITy pLANNIN~ COM?dISSION
~-3 -
PC89-237
: ~°v