Resolution-PC 89-251~ 4 »
` ~` " ''f";~
,~ µ,~ ~,4~,~
,~,~F
,t
ti
! R~QLi1T7.ON N .0 PC89_251
~ A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM C3TY PLAN27ING COMMISSTQN
~ THAT PETITION FOR CONDITTOVAL USE PERMIT N0. 3192 EiE nEN:fED
WHEREAS, L-he Anaheim City Flanning Commisaion dic~ receive a
verif.ieci Petitiun f.or Conditionbl Use Pormit from DON~I~D FCIRBES AND KENNETti
~' WALKER, 131 Terraza San Angelo, La HnbXa, CA 9U631, ownerc, and GEORCL•
~~ Y;RAJACIC, 720 '.Cown and Country Road, Oranqe, CA 92668, agent, of certain. re~7.
property situahed i.n 1:hQ City o£ Anaheim, Couni:y of Or~nga, State of
California, describod as follows;
THOS~ PORTIONS OF SECTION 9 TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH RANGE 10
WEST IN THF. It7+NCH0 SA~I JUAN CAJON UE SI~NTA ANA IN THE
CITX OF A.PTAHETM~ t,OTJN~.'Y OF ORANGEr STATE l~F
CALIrORNIA, AS PFR MAP RECOI2DED IN AOOK 51 PA.GE 10
MISCSI,LANEOUS Nu1PS, IN THE; OFFICE OF THc COUNTI
RECORDF:R OF ~AID COUNTY DESCRIBCD AS FOT,LUW5:
". PARC_'EL l:
IIEGINNING A1' THB TNTEI?SECTION OF THE CFNTERLINE OF
WES1' STBEET, AS SHOWtl ON A MAP E'ILED TN BOOR Y PAGE
56 OF RECORD OF SURVEY~, IN THE OFF'tCE OF '.CHF COUNTY
R~CORDER OF SAID •.'OUPITX, WITH ~HE EASTEFtLY
PROLONCATION OF THE NURTH L:[NE OF LOT 2, AS SHOWN ON
SkZD MAP; THENCE NURTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CENT~;33r~iNE
TO A LINE PARALLEL WTTH AN~ DISTAPlT NORTIiERLY 15.00
I'EET F120M SAID NORTH LIN~; THENCE WI~;STERLY ALUNG SAID
PARALLEL LINE 'CO ~IiE INTERSECTION' WITH A CURVE
GONC~NTRIG WIxH 1~D DISTANT SOUTHh,ASTRRI,Y ;!0.00 ~'EET
FRUM THE SOU'TFi~ASTERI.Y T~INE ~~F TI:E LANA DE;CRIBED TO
THG COU~ITY OF ORI~PTGE RECORAED JUNE 30, 1959, TN BOOK
4780, PAGE 93 OC OFF'ICIAL' RECORDS; THENCE
SOUTZIWESTERC.Y ALONG SAIU CURVE TO THE NORTH LINE 0~
SAID LOT 2; THENCE EASTERLX ALOtIG SAID NORTFI LINE AND
PROLQNGATTON THERFP'ORE TO THE POINT OF BEGINtizNG.
PARC~G 2
THAT PORT.TON OF SECTION S TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTF~ RANGE 10
~
~' WEST IN 1HE R7~NCHU 5AN JUAN CA•JOlI DE SANTA AITA IN THE
CTTY OF ANAHF:IM, COUN'PY OF ORI,NGE, STA'PE OF
~ CALI~'ORNtA, A3 kF.R MAP ftECORDED IN BOUK 51, PAGE 10
MISCFLLANEOUS MI~~S, IN THr, OFF'ICG OI' TFTE COUNT'Y
RECURDEk OF $AID COUNTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOFVS:
~i
ii
HEG:Pir1ING AT A f OIN'r I,l TFIE CENxER~,INE nF WEST
STREET~ 524.40 ~EE~T uOUTHERLY FRUM THE TNTERSECTiON
OF 5AID CENTERLINE AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAIA SECTT.ON
9, AS SAOWN ON A MAP FIL~U IN HAOIC 1, PAGB 5G RECORDS
OF SURVEYS, Tt1 THE QFEICE OF THE COUNTX R~C:ORDER OF'
SAID COUN1'Y, SAID PQ2LIT Q~' BEGINNIIr'G B~I1'vG THE
IN'PERSECTION OF THE EASTERI,Y PRO~UNGA'~ION OF THE
tiORTH LTNE OP' SAID LOT 2 AND THE CENT~RLINE' OF SA:[D
WEST STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, AI,ONG THE CENTdRLINE
1094r -].- PC89-251
. ~Y
s 6.
,; ,
~r~
~
~ %,
+t~}rtP;7h
~,
; ~!rt!
~
/~~'1
~ OF SAID WEST STREE~', ~~3.20 FEET TO THE SOUZ'HER'L~'Y
LINE OF SAIA LO'r 2, EXTENDEU TfJ SAID CFNTERI,INE OP'
TIIE hES':; Z'HE4ICE W~STERLY ALONG TFIF SOU'~H LINE OI'
~ SATD T~OT 2 ANn I~S EXTEN3ION, 562.59 FEETj THENCE
NORTIi ~71. 5. EET PARALLEL 4VI7:H THE EAST LINE OF THE
NQRTHW~ST QliAFTEK OF THE NORTHW~ST QUARTER GF SAID
SEC'i'TON ~ TO A POINT IN THE NOTtTH LINE OF SAIb I~QT 2;
THENCE EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINa OF SAID
+:i SECTION 9, 437.69 FEET TO TFI~ PLAC~ QF Bk~GINNING.
WHEREAS, L•hQ (:ity Planning Cornmiss.ion did hald a public hoaring
, at the Cavzc Centar in the City of Anaheim on September 11, 19t39 at 1:30 p.m.,
notice o~ said public hearing hav~.ng been du].y givexi as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the AnahUim Municipal Code, C~apter 18.03,
to h~ar and consid~r evidence for ancl agaiiist said proposed conditional use
vermit and to i.nvesti~ate and make fin~ings and recommendations in connoctian
therewith; and said petition was continued t:o th~ m~etings of October 9 and
- Qctober 23, 19t19; and
WHER~~S, said Commissian, after ~ua inspectiun, invas~igation
and study made by itself and in i.L•s belialf, and after due consicieration of all.
;~ evidence and reports offex•~d at sai~3 hearing, does find and determine i:he
, following facts:
X. 7haC the petit5.oner requests approval of a condiL•ional use
p-~rmaL• ur-der auti-ority of Code Sections 18.32.050.045 and 18.32.080 to
cox~SL•;:uct a 2-story, 12-unit RM-2400 condominium complex.
2, That the proposod use is heroby denied on the basis hhat
R~clas3ifieation No. 89-9U-03 for RM-2400 (ReaS.dential, ~tultiple-Family)
Zoning submitCc~d in canjunction with said ioquest was denied by the Planning
t:ottunission or~ L-he basis that multxplo-Eamily residential uniL-~ are x~ot
appropriate in this single-family residential aroa; and instead, Planning
Commission approved RS-50Q0 (Rosidential, Single-Familyj Zoning.
3. That the proposed usa wi11 adversely af£ect the adjoining
land uses and the growth and development uf the area in which it is proposecl
to be lacated.
t 4. That the ~ize an8 ~hape oC the site proposod for the use is
~~ not adequate *_n allow clie fu11 developmor,t o: the pro~a5ed use in a mannRr not
~!'~~ detr~ren~al t~ Cha ria:ticular ar~a nor ta tho peace, health, safaty and
~ ge-+eral we]..fare of the Citizens of the C.ity of Anaheim.
~7
5. :.'hat the granting of the ~on~ikional Use Permit will be
dp::imental t~ the peacQ, health, saEety and gene~r~1 welfare of th~ Cit3.zens
oi the City of Anaheisn.
6. That the t;:affic generatod k,y tha proposed use wil]. impose
,~. an undue burden upan the stree*s and highwa,ys designed and imprcved to carry
~he traffic in the nrea.
;, '
:j
3~, '~
~~ ,_,
7. Tnat: five (5) persons indicat~d their presence at said
public hear.ing in opQosi.tion; and that lettars and petiL•ions contaiz~ing
approximatoly 29C signature were received in opposition to tho subject
petxtion.
-2-
PC 8~-Z.~+1
~.~s
1
,.
;<. ~,
~~ ':~1
~
,..~_ ~j.
t.t.
• ;'~'~
',, i
r7
;
;,'
CALIFORNIA E~iVIRONMEN'PAL 0[JALITY ~T I'I,t~DINGs 'i'hat ~he Anr~ho.im
City Plannzny Comcnission ha3 reviewed the proposal to reclassify subjecL-
property from tlys ~iS-10000 (Re;~identi~l, Si.rig2e-Fa~nily) Zone tu the RM-2400
(Residenti~,l, Muli:iple-I'amil.yl Zone and to ccnstruct a 2-storg~, 12-uni.t,
RM-2400 condominium complex an an irregularly-shaved parcc~l of 1~nd
cor~sisting of approxzmataly 0.87 acre, ht~vzng a frontago of ~pproximately 233
feet on th.e weut side uf West Strcet, :~aving n mdximum denth of approximatoly
365 feet, being locatei~ approximately 350 Feet south af t2ze centerl.ine o~E L,a
Pa1ma Avonue ana £vrthe.r doscribed as ZQO1 No~tk~ Wast Stre~rt; and daes hereby
approve the Negative Declax•ation upon tinclfng that it has corzsidered the
2legative Declaration tngether wi~h any comments received during the public
review procoss and further finding on L•he basis of the initial study an~3 any
comment~s receivsd that there is no substantial evidcnce that the projc~ct wil.l
have a significant ~effect on the environment.
NOW, TIi~REFORE, BF IT RESOLVGD that the Anaheim City Pianning
Commissioii dnes hereby deny s~xbject Pet3tion for Conditional USe Permit, nn
th~ basi.s of the aforementioned fiixdings.
THE FOREGOING F2ESOLiJTIUN is signed and approved by me this 23rd
day of October, 1989.
, ,..~ ~/ i
,.~,',"~'~ ' ".~-
CHALRMA.~1, ANAAEI CITY PLANN~.NG COMMISSION
hTTESTs '
--- --~~~~ - ~ f / '' ~.
SECRETAR , J~NAF3EIM CITY PLA,2~NING C~MMI5SION
STATE OF Cl1LT.FORNIA )
COUNTY OF qRANGE ) ss.
CTTY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edittx L. Harris, Sec.r~tary of th~: Anaheim C.ity Planning
Commission, do hdreby certify that the fureqning resa:Lution was passad axid
adopted at a meeCing of tht~ Anahe,iM City PZanning Commi~~Ioz- he.ld an October
23, 1989, t~X the fellow.ing vot~ of the members thereof:
AYESs COMhSISSION~RS: HERf3ST, EOYDS~UN, HET,L~CER, FELllHAtj~~
MC E3URNEY, MESSE
NUES: COt~lI55IONERS: NONE
Ai.3SENT: COMMTSSIONFRS: BOUI~S
IH WITNESS WFYEREOF, I have hereunto set my hanc~ ~l~is 23r3 day
of October, 1989. _
~_. ~ __-'='`!`'"„~-T~v ~ ~ ,/'V"~v ~-.
S~CRETAF.X, ANAH~:IM CI1'Y PLANNING COA~II~fIS5I0N
-~- Pf~ $9-251.
.,
i: ;~,
F~ ,',K~ + ° : ,~~...
, ., :. - . .. _ , ..
~~~:~;~~~ ,,. ,
, ,. . , s~
-- , . .,. .~ ~. . „ .. . ... ,..... ,,~.~~~