Resolution-PC 89-269. . . . . .. , . . ,. 1 t'fR: { .t;f.
~~ 4
.. r ~" ~
i ~1~
~' '. , ~
~~,.~gt.~r~QN N0. ~C89_269
A RESOGUTION Q~ THF ANAHEIM CITY PLANNTN^ CnbfMTSSIOAT
ADOI~TTNG AND RE(;AbQdENDSNG x0 'TH~ CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 26'/-2
'WHE~REAS, the City Couiicil af the City af Anaheim did adopt the
Anaheim Gener~al P.l~n by ResuluCion No. 69R-644, showing the yeueral
descript3.on and extent. ~€ possible tutare devQlopmont within th~ city; er.d
WH~REAS, oursuant to Z Planning Commission request fAr an amenciment
t~ ~he Land Use Elemr~i:L• of tk-e Goneral Plan, in co~iformanco with Sactions
18.03.050.05 and I8,03.050.030 oE the Anaheim :~anici~r~l Code, staff propared a
Gen~r%i Plan Amendment t~ rec~asig~ate Erom the existing Modium Den~ity
R~s~dential C~@S]Q11~~1OX1 to a I.aw-Medi.um Den~it~• ~2esid.ential designation ~Por
the stud} area consisting af approximately 'L.8 a.cres conaisting of those lr~
properties locate~ci on the north tiiid south siclas of Chestnut Stree':, beginning
appraximat~ly 155 feet west of the c~r.tarlisze of Harbcr poule~~t~rd and
extending west approxim~L-ely 420 faet t.o tne westerly torminus of sai.d s*reet~
identified as 5tudy Area 2; ar~d
WHrREAS, the Plar.ninr~ Departmai~.t ~leemed it appropriate, p~xrsuant to
Che provisions of the Cali.fornia Gn~•irorunonta7. ~luali~y .Act, th~t tYaere are no
significant onvir~nmentai impacts r,nd ~:QCOmmendecl that a Negative 1:-eclaration
bt~ approvod; and
WHER:~AS, the An~;hei:n City Planning Commission did hold a public
hoaring aC the Anaheim C.ivi~~ Ceuter, Counci'1 ChambeY•, 200 So~.-th Anaheim
Boulevard, on November 6, 1989, st 6:00 p.m., notice of sai:~ public hearing
having bean duly gi.ven a3 requirQd by law an~ in accordanc~ wath th~
rrovisions of the Anahaim Munici.pal Code, ~a hear and consider ~vidence for
an~j against oaid Genera'1 Plan Acnendment and tu invc~stiqate and make ~,indings
and recommendat.ior~s in cnnnecti~~n L•herec~i~h; ~nd
WH~REAS, caid Comr,~ission, af.tor due consideration, inspection,
invc~stigation and study madz by itself, ar.d aft~r duo c~nsiQeration of all
evidence an~ reports o~ferect at tioarinq, DO~S FiERE[iY FIND:
1. That duE to City Council an~3 Pl~snx-inc~ Commission concerns
regarding ~nultip.le~-family residenti~l developraent in Anaheim, a phased work
plan was developed whic}i included, in part, an analysis of ar~as rlesignated as
~tediw~~ Density Residon~i~l on the General Plan, as well as tbose areas zoned
RD!-1~00 west of StatE Colleg~ Boulevard to the western City li.mits to
det~~rmino land use f.nconsistencies.
2. xhtst staFf: conduc~ed a detailed analysis oF the General ?lan
designat3.ons, zoning nna lan~l use and identified 308 acres on which
inr.onsistencies exiat betweon ]and uses and th~ Gsr-eral Plan designation
and/or zonii:q.
3. That d~~icl~nCO presented substant_iate~ the need Eor an am~ndment
to the An~heim Gc~neral Plan and that Exhibit A bQ adopted redes3gnati~ng
subje~t area for Low-Medium UensiCy Residen~ial .land us~s, r~thar than Medfum
Density Re~idontial as roquostecl by tlis property owneXS.
N1132r PC 89-2b9
K.;.w_._
}%1"i'7 +LSU!' 3i:~~ r 1 ;..i G,.•,,:C . :~..~^::,Jls :., ~ i ',~~~1
r~ .. . ... ''~i. .. ... , ~~'7..r',~ i ?'~... .i .'~ ~~ . ~. ~ , ~ t , ~~
lV~ ~ ... -~r-. . . . I ....,`~l n:~~.:i: ~ ~r 1,~ryvAA'~Jlh~1~ ~
~j~ . y .~ . .4 R !*,;~..
''} ~~ ~~.x,~ ,s~;
~
;
,~,
;,~
;..,
~LIrQR~iTA ENVT,~Q~IMENTAL ~UALITY A~T 'TN i]~C,~'i That the ~z~ahAim Ciky
Planning Commi~sion has r~sviewec~ the propc+sal Co amerad ~ho Lai~c1 Use Flament of
the Goner~l Plan ta chang~ th~s current designi~tian oi Medium D~nsity J~
RosidQritial desigr~a~ian to Low-MEidittm Don~xt-,y Restido~~tia1 land uses on ~~
approximately 2.R acrea consisti.ng of those Z8 properties located on the north
and aouth sides of Chestnut Street, begznn3.ng approximai:ely I65 Eeet wes~ of
tho cexiterlinQ of Harbor tioulevard an~ extQndzng weat appro:cimately 420 feet
t•i the westerly terminus of said strk~et; and does ~.herefore approve the '
Negatiue lleclar•ation on the basis C'hat it has considered the pr~~osed Negative "'
Declaration together with any commants recPivecl durincY the public review
prc~cess and fur~her finding on the basis of tho Initial Study ~nd any comments ~'
received tlaat ~h,ere zs no substantial Qviclenc~ that the ~aroject wi11 have a ~
signi£icant effect on the enviranment. ~i
NOW, TFIER~FORE, IIi. IT PFSOI~VEU, thai: L• arsuanC to th~ above fS,ndings,
the ~lahsim City Plannir,c~ Commission does hereby adopt anc3 recommend tio the
Cit,y Council of tho City of Anaheim adcaptian of General Plan Amendment No.
267-2 - Lar.d UsQ ElemQnt - Ex}iibit A to redesignating subjc~ct ~r~ea for
L~ow-Me~~3ium Density Residential land ~zss~s.
'~'HE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 6th c]a,y
of Novemb~r, 1989.
. j /);' ,
'~~ ~~~~~-~;'~-'%~ r~~•~J
CHAIRW MAN PRO TEMPORE
ANAH]:IM CYTX PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: ~J
___.___ ~L`'"~'~'~-~.~. .
SECRETARY, ANAHEIt~( CIT'1 pLANNII3G COb4•fISS.:ON
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
C~UNTY OF OR.A2TGE ) ss.
CTTY OH' ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. '~iarris, Socretarl of i:he Anaheir~ City Planning
Commission, do horeby cc~ctify that the f~regoingr resalution was passed 2~nd
aclopted at a meQCing of the AnahQim Citx Plannir,g Commiasion held on Navember
6, 1989, by the Eollowi.ng v~te oE the members thereof;
AXES: COMMI5SI0r1~;gS; BO:JAS, ~OYDSTUN, FELUFIAUS, HELLYER
M~ HURNEX, MESS~
NOES: C 'dMISSIUNERS: NONE
ABSENT: '~fMTSSIONERS: HERBST
ltl PIITNESS WFIEREOF, I have horo~,~nto sc~k m~r h5nd this 6th day of
November, I989.
~ _.d, 6L-~_~ .~.c1 .
IM CITX PLANNING COMMISSION
"2'. PC 89-269
S~;CRETARY, Al7AHE ^
_'.~
,,,