Resolution-PC 89-28~i'~'A~~\u
f~'~,~~
'-4
~~k~
'.-'.1
~_OL~TIQN x9, PC.~$~_2,,,$
A RESOLUTION OF' TFiE ANI~HF.;IM C:ITY rGANN'ItJG COMMISSION
THAT f~ETITIOrI FOR REI;LASSIFTCAT20N N0. 8a-8~-29 Bh GItANTED
WHERLAS, the Anaheim City Plannang Commigs3on did receive a
veriEiod pot3.tion for Iteclassifi.ca~ion fro~n SHIH-YE;N CHIAM, JUI-WA CHIANG, AND
btENG--Bh-LIN, P.O. F3ox 3928, Tustin, CA 926a:i, owners, and F~ALDOCK & FLAIE2
ARCFiITECT5, 17780 ~itch, Suite 280, Irvino, (:A 92714, a~ont, o£ cercain real
pronRrty situated in ~2ie Cit•y of An~heim, County of Orange, 5tate af
Calzf~rr~ia, dQS~ribed as follows:
PARC.EL 2 AS SI[OWN QN A MPA FILED IN BOOK 11Z, PAGE 2
~F PARCEL MAF'S IN TI~E OFFICE OF THE COUNTY FtGCORD~R
~T' ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
WIiEREAS, ~he C:Ity Planning Comnission did hold a public: hearinr~
at the Civic CQnter in tha City of Anaheim on January 16, 19F39 at 1:30 p.m.,
notic~ ~f ~ai.cl p~~blic hearing haviny been duly givan as required by law aUd in
accordancu wit}~ the provisions af tre Anaheim Municipal Codo. Chapter 18.03,
to hear und consider avidence for ana aqainst said pxo~osod :oc:lass.tSication
and to investigate and nake findings and recommendstions in connection
therewitn; and said public tiearing was continuad t~ the meeh.ing of January 30,
1989; and
WEIEREAS, ~aid i:ommi ssion, after dixe ins7~ection, investigation
and stucly rnadQ b} .i~se1L ancl in its be;~alf, anc3 atter due eonsideration of all
evidence and re~?>:~s off~red aL• ~aid hearing, does find and determine the
Col?.owinq facts:
:t. T.hat the petitioner proposts reclassification o~ subject
proFerty from tlia RS-A-•43,OU0 (ResidQntial/Agr.icul.tural) zone t~ the ~tM-1200
(ResicienCial, ~:ultiple-Family) or a.l~ss i~tonse zonQ.
2. That tho Anahaim Gen;~r~l '~lan desiqnato~ subjec~ pr~perty
for Genera.l Commercial ~lorig Euc2id S'Preot and Meclium Density RQSidential for
~he balance of the propQrty.
3. ThaL• the propos~d reclassiEication oE subjoct p:~operty is
necpssary 7nd/or. cl~sirable for the orderly and propor devolopme~t af the
community.
~. That khQ proposoci reclaasificaCion of subjecc property does
propor].y relate to the zonos ~snd their parmltteci uses locetlly establishe~l fn
c1nAe proximity to sub;jcct ~,roperty and to the zcnos and th~:r permitted uses
generally ~stablished throughout thQ community.
5. ThuC t:he proposoci reclassifiaation of subjact propQrty
requicets the dedication and improvement of abuttinq ~treats in accordance with
the Circul~t-ian Element oE Che Genaral ~lan, due Co thQ anticipated incroa~so
.En trafFic which ~+il: bo ~enerr~tod by tha inrensification of ,lanA uaa.
0644r -1- Pr89-20
;;A,
. . . ' ~ . . ~ . . . , .,~~1` 1.,1~~
~ ~ ... ~~'~:
~~'~ ~ ';;
,,;.
6. Th~t no ono ina.~C~r.ea their presence ~.t r~aid public hearing
in opposiL-ions an~l that r:; correapondence vlas receive~l in oppoa3Cion to
subj~ct pe~it~.on.
~L~FORNIA ENVZRQt~',~NT~j;LQU\L~aT'~t~CT FI DII3~: Thar the Anahyim
City P'l~rining Cummission Y,zs revie+rod the proposal to roclas~.ify subject
property from the R5-A-4;,000 (k2esaQentaal/AgriculL•ural) zone to i:he 12M-1200
(Itesidential, Multiple-Family) or a Ie,ss .intense zane to construct a 56-unit
apartmc~nt complex on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consis~ing of
ap~?rox3.matoly 2.J acres l:aving a i:ronL•age of approxi.mately 286 ERet: on the
Qast 5i~e of Euclid Str~set, havir_g a maximum depth of approximately 3fi3 feet,
and 1~eing l.oc~ted agproximately 290 feE~t north of the cQntorline nf La Palma
Avonue :,nd furtl3er describ~d as 1126 North cuclid Street; and does hareby
approva the NegativQ Dec;laration upo,i finding tha;. it has considored the
2tegative Dec].aration together with Any comman~s received cluring tne publxc
review process anc'i furthQr findiMg on Che basis of the initial study and any
commei-t~ received that there is no substant;ial avidQnce thar r_ho project will
have a sigi~ificanl• affecr. on tha environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, B~ IT RE:SOLVFA that the AnahQim City Plannir.g
Commission does hereby ~7rant subject Patition £or Recla~si.ficz~tion and, by so
ctoing, that Title 18-Zoning oE tTio A;iaheim Municip,~l Code bc amended to
exclu~le the abave-described property £rorn ths+ F2S-A-43,U00 ZotiQ and ~o
incorpurate said d~scribed groparty into the RM-120~ Zone upon the follqwing
coriciltion~ which are tiereby four~d to be a~-ec~:ssary prerequ+.site to the
praposed use ~f subject properCy in orde.r to praserve tho safet~~ and general
welfare o.f the Citizens of the City of An~3heim:
1. That street lighting f~cilitiey ~long F,uclad St:rQet shall be installed as
requirQd by the Utiliti~s General ManaqQr in accordance with
specitications on Lile in Che Office qf ~Jtilities General Manager; or
that secur;Ly in the form of a bond, certiLicatQ of deposit, lotter ot
credit, or cash, i.n an amount and Eo-m satisfactory to the City og
Anahcaim, shalJ. be postod with Lhe City tc~ quarantoe t}ie satisfactory
completicn of the above--mentioned improveme;~ts. Said security ;th~tl'1 be
posted with the City of Anaheim prior to tha intr.r~auction of an nrdinance
rezoning subject propocty. The above-requlred improvpments sha11 be
installe~ prior r_o or,cupancy.
2. TZtat the lagal ownar oE subj~ct proper~y sh~ 1 icrevocUb'ly otfQr to
dddicate to thv City of Anaheir~ a strip of land f.ifty tt~rc~e f 53) feet in
width from the centerline ot tha street along Euclid Street for stroet
widaning purposes.
3. ThaL• tlie lRgal owner of subjecl: property shall irrevoc~bly otF~r to
dedic.lto to the City u= Anar,~im an additioilal strip of. land along Euclid
SLreet, maasurad northerly from the ultim~to riqht-uE-way line at the
coxner of. the intersoction of Euclid StreQt and La Palma Avonue, and
varying in width from twelve (12) foet for the first thrQe-hundred (300)
feet nnd l:hen transitioning fr~m tw~lve (12) f:Qet to 0 feot for tho next
three-hunc9rgd (3Q0) foet.
4. Tha~_ a five (5) foot wide public utility aasement along th~ eastern ano
-:undrsd fifty (150) feet oY tt~e nocth ~roperty lis~e shall be de8icatod to
the Cfty of Ana-'~eim. proof of said r~corded de4fcation shall be
suhmitted tco th~s Zoning Aivision. ~ ,;
,
;:
-2 PC89-2$ ~
~
~*""~
~~,r.i
"1
;l
'r.,
5• 7'hat•. a fae shall bo pa3.c~ ~o thn r,itp oE Anaheim for traa planting nlorig
Fuc7.ic1 Street in an amaunt as E~~ablished by City Couricil resolution.
6. Thah, prior to introduc~ion uf ~n nzdinaiicc~ razoninc~ subjoc~ praperty, the
loqal proparty owner ~hall pr~pare and racord an u.nsubordinated cavenant
limitiinq occupancy uf et~ch apartmpnL unit to no more than t:wa (2) pers~ns
(other than children under the age oL• two (2) yaars) per bedroom. Said
limitalion shall be included in Qarh ].ease/r~ntal agreement. A copy nf
tho coven~~nt sha13 be subrr~ittad to and approved by the City Attorney
prioi• to rQCOrdat.ion. A copy oL• the r.QCOr.ded covenant shall be £urnish9d
to L•ha Zoniug Division.
7, rhat a covenant shall be re ~orded agrc~eing to pro~~•iae i:he renter of eac:h
dwelling unit with Tax•ittAn information oLtained from the School
Distx•ict(s) pertain.ing k.A possib].e overcrowd~d conditions anci busing
s~atus of the scho~l(s) sarving L•he dwellinq uni.t.
8• T}~at nc~~ owner oL yubject pronarty shall submil ~ lettr~r requesting
termination of Vari~nce No. 153 ancl 1118 lo the Zuning Division.
9. That prior to the .introduction of an nrdinance rez~ning sixbject propert,y,
ConCiition Nos. 1 through t2, above_m~ntianc:c9, sha11 bo completod. The
provisionfi or ri~hts granted by this resolution sh~ll hecome null and
void by action of the Pl~nning Commission unloss sai~ conditions are
complfed wiGh withi2i or.~ (1) year from the date of tk:is rc5olution, o,~
such furthar time as the Planning Commission may grant.
10. Thaf: appr~val of tti~.s applic~tion cr~nstitutes approval of the proposed
request only to the extot~t that it complies with R;he Anahaim M~inicipal
Zoning Code an~ any uther applic,able City regulatioas. Approval cloes not
incliicle any action ~r f.ind.inys as to compliance or a~proval oL• the
re~uest regarding any oth~r anplic~ble ordinanr.e, regulation or
requirement.
BE IT FUftTHER RESOLVED ttiaC tt~e Anaheim City Planning
Commission does h~reby find and determine that adoption oE this Resoluti~n is
expressly predicated uQon applicant's ~:OmplidtlCt3 wit~i each and a'll of tho
cor.clltions hereinabovQ sot tc~rt•2~. Shoul~~ any such cor.ditions, or any part
thergof, be declared invalid or unonf.orceable by the fi.nal judgmant of. any
cnurt of compstent jurisdiccion, then ~his Resolution, and any appruvals
2ierQin containod, sha11 be dr~emr~d null and void.
TH~ FOREGOING RFSOT.,UTION ia signod and approved by me this 3Qth
day of Januarl, :L989.
~ '!:• r `/ ,~ i~i' ~
~1...- ,: ..~t_-_/j=_ :_c.::'~_..----
C;iAIRWOMAPI, ~ AF;EZM CITY PLANNING CJMMISST.ON
ATTF,ST:
_...' -~~~~ -'-1------~~-- ---------
SECRETARY, 1~NAF{£IM ~ITY. PLANNING COI~fI;iSTON
-3-
PC89-Z8
^'!""':r~~~a ,sr~~:. :~
/y +.,.,p ...~•pI1_,
~{" ' . . .. . . . ~ . ~ ...
~
'
'
. , . , r -
';.
VG~~
~~y,~I
I
'"w^~,-
~ 1 ~ k~.~'+r h. J4.V/.T.L'9d/'k~k77iQUUAf"1.
` ~ ~ ~
49
w .r
~'
'
,~
~ y
,~
Yj
' ~
'~
~
r
''
~ ~,
. .
, ~
~~;i
ti
;; i;
~1
STATE 0~ CAC,IFpHNIA )
CUUNTX OF ORANGE ) Sg~
CITY OF A'NAHEIM )
1, Edith I,. Fzarris, Secrett~ry of thg Anaheim City Plt~nnit~g
Commission, do hereby csrtify ~hat thQ foreguing rosolution was passeQ and
adopted aC a moet,ing of the Anaheim Cit! Plann.ing Comm3s~ion held on January
3U, 1989, by h.he Lollowing voto of the members thereof:
~Y~S: COMMIa5Y0NERS: BOUAS, fiOYDSTUN, CAI2USILLO, FELDHAUS, H'~RBST,
MC BURNEY, MESSE
NUES: COMMISSTOI3E8S: NONE
AIISk;NT: COMMISSTONCRS: NO~vE
IN' WITNESS WiiEREOE, I ha~o herQUnto set mx hand ~his 30th c'ay o~
J~anuury, 1989,
__---.-~~~c'..~_ ,~ / - .
uECRFTARX, ANAHEItQ CITy 1~LANNING COMMIS~ION
-4 -
r°~
:.s
PC~9-28 .:~
'f~?
;1;~.
' •,t~,
`.~