Resolution-PC 89-295~~~n~YY'~~!ty°~.~.7ic,"w..~ F~f~fPfi'ti~S ( ..:T.., tl iT',..i~Yll..~ f V~(:?X~ t41i];~v~~ ..i~',.~e, ~! i~(,~•4~( ~~.:.. 1 r ,E.i I iY'.~ . j-t ~s.f br ,7 n ~
,-~ 4 ,.1,,,;.~ t~:!~r ' ! 7 .iP.~!`;i';Si 3g1~''"i~~?t~lltr~~
~R~
, ~~.~ ~„ ~~
; _ . ~ ~~~
,
:; A,:~~;
; ;:~.
RGS~Li1TI0N N0. .`~ $9-295
.:~
~ A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COh4•fT5SI0N
DrNYING GENERAL PLAN' AMENDMEN'1' N0.272
~ .
, LAND USE ~L~MENT .?
~
WIi~REAS, the City Couz-cil oF the City oE Anaheim did a3opt the
Anaheim Gerieral Plan by Resolurion No. o9R-644, showing the g~nsral
description and extont of possible Eutu•ro development wzthin the aity; and
WHFREAS, pursuant to a prcperty-owner reques4 f~r an amendment to th~
Larid Use Element of the General Plan, staff preparec! a General Plan Amendment
for the study area consistiing of approximately 1.35 acres havi.ng a trontage oE
approximatQly 190 feet on the nurth si~e of Katolla Avenue, having a maximum
dep~h oi appr~ximate:lp 318 t'eet and being located appr~acimately 320 fieet east
of the centerJ,ine of Carnelian Street and further dt~scribed as 1585 West
Katella A.venue; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Department deomed iL- approQriate, pursu3nt to
the provisions af the California Environmental Quality Act, that khQre are no
significant environmenL•al impacts and t.'h~t a Negakive Declarati~n be approved;
and
WHEiZEAS, the Ariahe'.m City Hlanning Commission did hold a public
hearinc~ at the Anaheim C'~ir. Center, Cowlcil Chamber, 20Q ;5outh ~naheim
T3oulevard, on November 6, i989, at 1:30 p.m., noCice of said pubXic hearing '~';
haviny been du3.y qriv~:i a~ required by law and in accorclanae with the
provis.ions oP the Anahe3~.~ Municipal Code, to .hear and consider eva.dence f.or ;`;;
and against said Genera.l Plan Amondment and to investi~ate and make findings ~,;,:
and recommendations sn connection therewi~h; said public hearing wa3 continuefl
to the meeting of Decembei 4, 198~:; and ~ ~~~~,';!,~
WHERLAS, said Commissi.c,n~ after due consideration, inspection, ~~
invesi:igatian and study made hy itself, and after due aonsideration of all
evidance aad r8ports oEfered at said hearing, DpES HrREBY FIND:
1. That evidezice presented does not substan~iate the noe~3 ~or an ~~r
amencLnen~ to the An~heim General P1an and that the existing ~esignation of 'i
Commercial Profe~sional lar~d uses should noi be changed at that time. ,
~LLIFURNIA ENVIR N~SEN .AL QUALITY A,T FINDINGS: Th~t the Anaheim City ~''
Planning Co:nmission has revzewed the propcsal to amend the Land Use Element of
~,, ~
`~
tt~e GenQral P:lan to redesignate subject property from the current Commercial ~~}
Protessional designa~inn to Low-Medium Densit.y Resi~lential land uses and to <; ~
;.':{
reclassify subject propRrty from the RS-10,000 (Residential, Single-Family) ''~
Z~ne tr tl~.e RM-24q0 (Resiciential, Multi~.e-Family) Zone and ta construct a `~~
2-story, 24-unit RM-2400 condominium project with waivers of ma~rimum 1~~
structur~l heiglit, minimum building setback, minimun~ rc~creaL-ional-lezsure area
,,:;:
and maximum £ence height (de1eL•ed) on a rQCtanyularly-shaped paz~cel o£ lsnd "'h
consisting of 4pproximatQly 1.35 acrc~s having a froni:age of ap;~roximate].y 190 `;~
£eet on ~he north sicle of Katella AvenuQ, having a mzucimum depth af ;„~j
approximately 3z8 fe~t znd being locatocl approximately 32U feet eas4 of the ~"~`~+
~'
~
centerline ~f Cax•nelian Skr~e~ and F~~rther ~escr~bed as 1585 West Katella
, ~~,
~
`:'
`
'~,
s;
#0666b F~C 89-295 ,,;~"
"~';S:
;:;,n~+
;~~
~
,
. .. . _ .. _ , _ ~ ,. ,..
'
a
}~ ,
, ~ , :t,.~e
,=~I
1
~
~
:;~
ATTF.5T : ; ~.i
p <.
~~,,,~~~; ~~ /' •~~ ~ ~/ .... E''r
~.'.s!6~fi.in'C.~:.,--` ~~~ ~'~-=~ZZ.__.~._..~ '~ - "~ `f~GJ"-r~,'~~j"x./c,~c~,,L.~ {7
S~CRETA,RY, ANAHEIM C:ITY ~~ ANL NING CQMMISSIOI7 ''~'°
G-~ ' :~:.
5TATE OF CALZFORNIA ) ~}!,
~
. , .. ~ ~ t ~.~~ir ii tn ~~~, i 71 ~ I~r x nr f~ f
.. . .. .. ' . _ , C ~~Y ~~~*;~~{~~~~`~
i
~ ~ ~ . . . ~ ~'~l`~~41.
(
1i
. ~ ... . , . ~r,~ ~il:~.
S
~~~:
'3;;~
;
~~';
~;~
j`s
Avenup; and does liere~iy apprpve the Negative Declaration upon Eitiding that it '` !:'
2-,as con~idered the Neg~tive nealaration together with any comments receivod f
during the public review process and further Lincling on tYze b~sis of the ~`~'
Initial utudy and any cpmme~zts rec~ived that hhere is no subsL-antiai evidence y
that the project will l:ave a significant ef£ect on ~he environment. ~!~
s
NOW, 'rHER~FORE, BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to the foregoing ~
f:indings, tho Anaheim City Planning Commissi~n does hereby deny General P~an ~{
Amendment No. 272.
THE I'OREGOING RESOLUTIOL7 is si x~ed and a roved b me tkxis 4th da f <>~'~
9 ~ PP Y Y o .~~
December~ ].989. ~, . ;`; r
~•.
.---- ''' J .~ 4
~~ ~"'~
_~..~AIR AN, .ANA7i . M CITX 1'LAATNING COh4rfISSTON
COUNTY OI' OZANG~ ) ss.
Y, F.dith L. H~rris, Ser.ratary of. the Ana.'~eim City Planning ~'
Commission, do her.eby ~certify that t}te faregaiag resolu~ion w~s passed and
adopted at a m~eting oE the AYiahc~im City Planning Commission held on Docenber
4, 1989, by the fol'ldwing vote ut the members thereof:
AY~S: ~OMMISSIONEI2S: BO'1'T)STUN, HE~28ST, MC BURNE`l, MESSE
NO~:S: CONIbSISSIONERS: BOUAS, FELDHAUS, HELL'YER s
AaSENT.: COMMISSIONcRS: NONF
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of ,,:~
December, ].989. ~
CZTY OF ANAH~IM
,~.
~~-c%~ .-~ •'~L.;'.~~ •--~ '`'~'~ s!~~.~'~G'~~/~~'/~,,/2~- '
r.CRE'~A~RY; ANAH~]:M~" CI7:Y PLANNING COMMISSION
~ Page -2 ~ PC 89-295
, !~
•:}
~' ~:.
~
''~f
,..
_ _ _ _ ,~..~~..~,
~.,;i
' ;~
`s~
,.
w
~,,~C,~
~'~ ~
. ' ~~
;;
,J.F~,
~~~ ~
RT;SOLUTION N0. PC 89-295
A RESOLUTION OF ~AE ANAHEIM CITX PLANNING COMMI55ION
DGNYxNG GEN~RAL, PLAN AM~NDMEN~' N0.2~2
LAND USE EC~EMENT
WHr'.REAS, Chs City Counc37. ~f the City of Anahe3m aid adopt th~
Anaheim G~naral Pla» by ReaoluCfan No. 69R-644, showing the qaneral
descriptfon ancl extent of. ~oss.~le future developmont withi.r. the citys and
WHE.REAS, pursuant to a property-awnor roquest for an amendment ro the
Land Use Element of the General Pian, statf prepared a Gener.al Pl~n ]-mc-nllment
for the study area con3isCing of approximatety 1.35 acres having a frontage of
approximately 190 teel on the north side of Katel.la Avenue, havinq a maximum
depth of approximatoly 318 £eet and beinq locatecl approxim~tely 320 feet eost
of tlie c:enterline of Car;ieli~ri Street aud turther desc.ribod as 1585 Weat
Kateila Avenue; ancl
WIi~REAS, the PJanniiig Department deemed it appr~priate, pursuant xo
tlie provisions of the Californi;~ Environmental Qualtty Act, t;hat there are no
significant env.ironrnantal impact:s and thr~t a Neyatfve Declaration be approved;
and
WHEttEAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing at the Anahefm Civic Center, Council CYiamber, 200 South Anaheim
Boulevarci, on Notombcr 6, 1989, at 1s30 p.m., notice of ;aaid public hoarinq
having been duly g.tvan a~ required b.X law and in ~ccordanco with the
provi~ions of the Anaheim Municipal Codo, to hear and consider avidence for
and against said General Plan Amendment and to investigate and maks findinqc~
and rer.ort~endations in connection therewith; said ~ubl.ic hearinq aas continued
to the meetinq c,f December 4, 19iI91 and
WFiEREAS, said Commisaion, aEter due r.onslflera*ian, inapection,
invesL•igation and sCudy made bf itself, and after due ccnsideration of all
evidence anc] reports offared at saf.d hearing, DOES NEREBY FINUr
1. ThaC eviiience presentad does not substantiate the nc~ed for an ~
amondment to the Anaheim General Plan and that the exi3ting deaigndtion of I
CommRrcial professional lund usos ahnuld not b~ chanqed at that time. ,
~
r~F.4~L7I1-_..,~tiY~R_4~1MBNTAL QU~;Ty AGT t~INp~~s That the Anahoim City
Planning Commiasinn has reviewed the proposal to amend the Land Uae SlemenC of
the General Plt~n ta rednsignste sub;ject property ~rom the current Commercial
Profesaional desiqua~ton Co L~w-Mecli~m D~nsfty Residential lAnd usea and to ~;
reclc~soiEy subject rroperty f.rom tho RS-10,000 (Reaidential, Sfngle-PamSly) ~
2one l•o the RM-240~ (Residontial, Mulhipla-Family) Zono and to conal•ruCt a
2-~tory, 24-unft RM-2~400 condominium projecC wi~h waivera oE maximum
structural heiqht, minimum buildinq setback, minfmwr. cecreatlonal-leiauce area
acd maximum fonce h~ight (8oloted) on a reccangularly-ahaped parcel aC land
c~nsfsting of approximsr,oly 1.35 acrae havir.g a trontago ot' approximAte2y 140
feet on the nnxth side of Xatell~ Avenue, havinq n maximwn c~eprh of '
aQproximAtely 318 foet and boinq locatefl apprnximate2y 320 feet ense nt the ~"
centarline of ~•arnRllan Streot and it~cthei doacribaci aa 1585 Woat Katella ~
A4666b
PC ~l9-295
i.
,,-, ,;
~.i ~ , . . . . .
~ . . . ' ~ . . . . . . . . ~ ~ .. . .. '~i!'~.".~.Y~.
~ •
~~ ~
t~kN.
1 `~~
~-~a
; n
~:,i
AvenueJ and does he.eby approve the Nc~g~tive ll~sclaratiou upon finding ~hat i~
rias ~onsidered the Negativ~ Dealaratfon tn~ether wiCh any canments raceivod
duri.ng the public revisw proaeas and further f3ndfng ~n ~he basis of tho
?nitial ~tudy and any commen~s recaived that the~:e is no subatant3al evidence
~hat the project w311 have a signifir.an~ effect on the environment.
NOW, xHERCFnRE, BE IT RFSOLVED that gurs~~t-nt to the toreqo3ng
Eindings, the A,naheim City P1anr~ing Commission does hereby deny Gen~ral Plar..
Am~ndment No. 272.
THE F'OREGOING RESULUTION i.s s,igned ancl proved by me this 4th day of
Decomber., 1989. ~i
. _.!~;~ , ~ ~ _. _. _.~ C.
~-_~:~f.:~. ,
CFIAIRMAN, I+,NAHE M ITY PLANNING COIrAfISSION
ATTEST:
` ~-~-~=9~~~"= ~--~~'L~.,,c~_
SECRETARY, ANAH~IM CI~'Y PLAr7NING COlMlISSION
STATE OF CALIFORt~IA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY U~' ANAFiEIM )
I. ~dith L. Har:ls, Secretary of che Anaheim City Pl.anx~ing
Commiagion, da hereby certify that the foreqoing resalution was p~-ased a~d
adoprod at a meeting of the AnFShoim CiCy Pla»ninq Corcrnlasion held on December
4. 1989, by the fol].owing vot•e of the mambors thereof:
AYES: '
COt~4~fIS~IONERS: BOYDSTUN, HERB~T, MC BURNEY, MESSE
NU1~S: COA4iI~SIONFRS: $OUAS, F~LDHAUS, HELLYER
ABSENTt COh4~SIS5I0NBRS: NON~
'SN WITtiESS WHEREOF, I have hereunLo set my hand thi~ 1th day of
Decombor, I989.
~ C~ ~.~~~-~.,r `~~-;~-_ ~,
_ Lt,t....
SECRETARY, JWAH3SM CITY PLANNING COA4rt'SSIU~
Page -2- PC 89~295
,1;
, ,
Ce;(i.a~d~~'.~1>c.'i.nk' 1..~.':t~:c. .r.,~.;',,~,~r.4...:....;~., ~•. . .... , , . .,.., . , _ ... .