Resolution-PC 89-297l ~
q!+~'d1~
r, ~
~
R~.L.~iT~.QN NQ. P.~~a9-?~
A R~SQLUTION OF TH~ ANAHEIM I:tTY PLANNYNG COMMISSION
7'HAT PE7'ITION F'OR CbNDI'~CIONAL USE PERMIx N0. Z214 HE DENxEn
~ ~~7
. . . . .if~..
W:iEREAS, the AnaYleim City Planning Commission did receive a
vorified Petitior~ for Condit~r,naY Use Parmit Erom JAFAR JAEiJANP~1dAH, 520 N.
Rexforcl Drive, H~verly Eiil.is, CA 90210, owner, xnd RONALD J. CRQW'LFY, I7Q0
Raintreo Rd., Fullerton, CA 92635, aqerit, for certain real Y~roperty situated
in Che C.ity of ?.nahQim~ CounCy of Orunge, State of Cal3fornia, desaribed as
tollows:
A PORTION OI' LOT 7 IN ~LOCK 17 OF A SUBD_T.VISION OF'
THE SOUTH HALF OF SECT'tOP1 21, IN TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH,
kANG~ 10 WEST, IN T.HR RANCHO LAS BOLSAS, IN ^:HE CITY
OF ANAHETM, CdUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CAC,IFORNI~'~, AS
PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 33 OF MISCELLANEOUS
ASAPS, TN ~HE OFt'ICE OF' T~iE COUNTY RECO1tbrR OF SAZD
COUrITY, DEaCRIACD AS FOLLOWS:
BEG~NNING AT T~iE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAIU LOT 7j
THENCE NOR'iH U DEG. 46' 20" EAST 669.60 FEET ALONG
'PHE WGST LTNF OF SAID LOT TO TF?E NORTHWES:' CORNER
TK~REOF; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 43' Sp" EASt' 339.00
FE~T ALONG THE NORTH LIIvE OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTH 0
DEG. 33' 10" WSST 668.$7 F~ET TO THE SCUTH LINE OI'
SAIU LOT 7; THRNCE NORTH 89 DEG. 51' 10" P' ;5T 340.40
FE~T ALONG SAIL SOUTH LINE TO THE POIHT QF BEGINNTNG.
F.~{CEPT THF WEST 150.00 FEET THEREOr.
}+.LSO EXCEPT THE NORTH 300.00 FEET THEREOF.
ALSO EXCEPT THERE:FROM AN UNDIVIllED 4/5ths INTEREST IN
THE SOUTH ~U.00 :eet of the East 12.5 FEET OI' SAID
LAND.
WHEREAS, the Ctty Planning Commission did hold a pub~ic hor~ring
at the Civic Center in L•he Cxty o£ Anahgim on Novembsr 6, 1989, at 1:3~ p.m.,
notiee of said publ:.c hearing havinr, beon duly given as required by law and iu
accordanc~ with ttie prov3sions of the Anaheim Municipal Co3e, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and considc~r evi~3ence for and again~;; aai9 proposed conditional use
~ermit and to i.nveatigaCo o,nd make finrlings r~nd recommendations in conr.ection
therewith; and said potitianor was continur~d to thR maeti:ig ~f Docember. 4,
1989, and
WHEIt~A.S, said Commission, after
and study mada by it3elf and in its behalf, anct
evidonce and r~eporr,~ offered at saic3 heariiig,
fol].owing Eacts:
1164r
-1-
due inspection, inve3tigaticn
~Eker due coiisideratiion oE a21
does find and dGtermine the
P~ 89-24%
t ,,
;;.
i :' :;;
i
i:
( '.' ~
i
F
r: ,
d ~~
':~:
f'.. ,
, <. -
~
~ ~ ,, ~ u .~
,
•.n~~«~5G~r7P~'+ijJ
, , ~
. ~ ~. . .
~ , „~ji i G~,+~
f4:{.
..
. ~ . . . .
, . . . _ .
•~'~`I
+'I'
,
. . ~ ~ ' ~
1\I
~! ~
l. T.hat tne petitioner rt~quests r~pproval of a conclitional use "~
per.mit under ~uttzority of ~".ade SQCLicns 18.32.050.045 and 18.3x.080 to ~"~
construct a 2-story, 24-uni ~, RM-2400 condominium complex with waiver of the
xoll4wing:
(a) ~E TIpNS 18.32.062,012 - M~ximum~~,~c~~cg~~~ight.
.~~~~ .Q~2.~ (Permitted: ~~~.Qry within 50 fQ.g.~ of
RS-10,000 zoninq to the west, and building `'
k~eight which is maximum 50~ of setbaak
di:stance;
proposeds 2-~t~ries at 10 feet, and buil~ling
heiqht ~118 feet) which is 1$R~ o.f aetback
d:istance (10 feet)
( b i ~~.~.~~Z~~.~.~0~?
( c ) ,~ •'P:[ r ~~~.Q,2?4
( d ) EC'P~~1~~.~y4~ . so 1
and 18.31,06~I.0'10
D in~,~m ~}ildinq se~~,~,3~.
(20 feQt requirad .~long KatQlla
Avenu~; p to 22 faet uroposed)
M_inimum recrg;~tio~iallleisure ~re~.
('750 sq.ft. per dwelling unit requireds
371 ~Q.f ~,, per dwelling unit proposod)
xi ~un Fen~ ~Teiaht
2. That tho proposed waivers (a) ~b) and (c) are hereby deni~d
on the basis thaC there are no specizl circumstances applicable to the
property such as size, shapP, topoc~raphy, loct~tion and surrounding~ which dq
not apply to other identically aoned prnperty in the same vicinxty; and that
strict applicati.on of ~he 2oning Coc~o does not dQprive the proparty of
privilege~ enjoyed by other properties ir, tho identical zone and
classiEicatiou ~n the vici.nity.
3. That the proposgcl waiver (d) was dsloted. ~
4. That keclassification No. 89-;90-23 file~d in conjunction
W3.th subject v~riance to r8class.ify tho property to Rid-2400 "Re~idential,
MuStiple-Family" Zoning was cleniod 'by the Planning Commission under Resolutiou '
No. PC 89-29b nn Decomber 4, 1989.
5. That the pzoposed use w.i11 advdrsely aEfect the ~djoining
land use~ and the growth ancl dovelopmen4; oE thQ area fn which it is proposad
to be located.
~'~
6. That the 3±ze and shape oE khe site pxopnssd for the use is
not aclequate to allow the Full dovelopment of thc~ proposad us~ in ~ manner n~t
detrimental to the particu2ar Are3 nor to the peace, health, safety and
general welfare of the Ci.tizens nf the City o£ Anaheim,
7. That the grxnting of the Conditional Uae Permit w.il2 be
detrimental to the poace, health, sa£ety and ganoral welfare of ~he Citizens
o,f the City of A naheim.
"2- PC 89-297 ~("
~~;~
::~
:>:~
141W~3u''~~""ti;i~i~~;'~~~tr;Y~~:i:i,'r :,(1?~il,pa'~+IV~Ft.Y:~~?~fr,~sy~r~~c''~ ~rl ~.;!?,'M' r~~`1uN:~it4 1 ~trw rr° ~`,ti'yY~ r fti:•trroa~ i r-vu r~
- . . . ,~~. ~ t~a hi~'F~. ~ ~,,~'~, ~ ~ F~ ~~_.~t~ F `'~ i ~F.'.7l ~ ~ r'~';{~~ atirNt'ta ^My~7Y axT~`tf `At t AN> d ~!
~ , _ ,~ ~.~ ~~. ~ ~.~~. ~~,J~A ~ ~,f~c,71Y 1 ~413~
- r~ ~',~~; '! ~~Vt~.'J. x ~.
~~'~~~~ r:
~ • 1 6`~'tusm ~ . . . d ~ [~Y
~ r ~~ A'
~' ~
8. 'chat th~ t.raf~ic generated by ~he proposed use will xmpose
an undue burden upon tYze streQts and highways designad an~l improv~d to carry
tho traffic in the area.
9. That two ( 2) people xndicated their prar~~nce ar said public ~''
he~.ring in opposi.tion; and that no rorr.espondence w•as r.eceived in oppasition '~'
Lo the ~ubject peti.tion. `~,~
~::
ATIFORNTA FNV_ TRONME;NTAL QUALITY ACT rTNDTN~'; That the A.nahe3m
CiL-y Planning Commission hos raviewoc~ the proposa3 Co amend ~he Land Use
Flernent of the Genoxal P1an to redQSiqnato subjecl: pr~perty from i:he current
Commercial Professfona.l designation to L~'w--Madium Density ~tesidQntzal .land
uses, ~o reclassify subject praperty from tha RS-10,000 (Resider~tial,
Single-Family) Zone ~o the RM--'t400 (Residontial, Mu.ltxple-F~mily~ Zone and to
construck a 2-story, 2~1-unit, RM-2400 condominium praject with waivera oP
maximum structural hoight, minimum building setbaCk, minimum recreatinnal-
leisure ax~ea and maximum fence height on a recL•angul~rly-shapesl parcel o£
land cc~nsisting of approximately 1.35 acros having a L•ron~age of
approximately ].90 feat or.i tho north si~le of Ka~ella .Avenuc~, having a ma~imum
depth of approximatel}~ 318+ fee~t, k~eing l~catod appraxima.telp 320 fee~ east of `
t}ie canterline ot Csrneliari Street ~nd further described as '1585 West Katella ;
Avenue; and does hereby ap~rove the Nag~tive Declaratio.a upon finding that it
has considerad the Negative Dsclaration together with any comments receiwed
durin.g t;ho public review gr.o~ess and further ginding on tho basis of tho
Initial Study and any comment~s roceivad that there is no subsrantial evi.dencc~
that the projer.t will havQ a~ignificanC ~ffect on the environmenk;.
NUW, THSREFORE, BE IT RES~L~~ED t;hat the Anaheim City Planning
Commission cloea hereby deny subjer.t Petxtion ror. Conditiona:l Use Permit, on
the basis cf• the ~Lo:ementioned findinqs.
TFIE FOFtEGQING .RESOLUTION is signQC~ and approved by me this 4th
day of Docomber, ].989. ~ ~ \
---~., .... ~ ~ ` ,LJ~
`~~~.-1. ~ .~~,
CH IR , P.NAHEIM ITY PLANNING COMMISSION ,
ATT~S'P :
) / •.:u iJ
/~.~ i.~ . / i n ... _/ / / `_y. ; .• "
<= JZ,i!.-i.•_•_•. ~, fl";l t~' .~~.G••r~. ri~~. /~~~~~j?i ~iY...~:d_._..
:" ~SECRETI-R , ~,T1l~HEIM CTTYi1~LANNING COMMISSION
/ ;' ~' ~''
, , ~, ,
~,r ~ i
"3" PC 89-297
^ -,
,; ~
,,_ . ~ , ~ ,
s~.~.. , , , „ ...~r
~ riJF
~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~.~ .. ~. ~ ~ ~~ .. '~,: i r., r t~ ~~.W~ b11Arl~~~ ~p.~'~l~y °~'t . ~.
.. . , i IY~~'~~(~~
C~ ~
~ . . . ~~,7.,:~~ ~ . . • ~ ' ~ . ' k~~l
tr v~.
` i;
~ ~ ~ s .'s~e'~~~
"~~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. ',~
^ITY OF ANA,HEIM )
~~ ~~i~
I, Edit•h L. Harr~s, Secr.etary oF Che Anaheim Ci.ty Planninq
Comm~ssion, do heroby corki.fy that the fore~oing resolution was passed and
z-3opted at a meetinq of the Anaheim Cit,y PZanning Commiscion held on Aecember
4, 1985, by the f.ollowing vote nf t-hc~ members thex~of:
AYES: COrIIdISSI0NER5: BOUAS, B~YDS:CUN, HERBST,
MC A(1RN'EY, MESSE , ;
NA[;Ss COMMISSIQNFRS: FELDHAUS, HELLYER
ABSENT: COMMTS570N~RS: NQNE
IN 'WTTNESS WFiFREOF, I have~ Y~~reuntn sek my hand this 4th day ot ';~
December, 1989.
'I
~1~~-~'/.~Q~aa~:_- ~~}'~/) ~ ~7'~~~'"~~~.~C..~?./7..~/.i~~
-----_~--
~SEC " RY, AN1~HEtM%~YTY FLANNING COMMISSIOi: °^}
~' ~- ~;~ ;:,~
_. .,~
~~~
.~~~
-~
_ ;:r
.,,
;~
. ~
.
;,_
:,,
~~~
~~,
~~~.,~
~ ;l i
''j
i`~
)i~
' I`~
J ~
-`~- PC 89-297 ~ ` ,~
,
;
~"„
t ~~
n ~ ,~:
.
~Y
r
. '~,p~
_ {y~
.. . . ~1.~J~"3'J.'}2S.'fl~J/.~:N~W7IY:LYS}P~2e;~".•a~rw:l.e.crbut~l ~J:,.,,..:.,...~<-,..~_... :. .~ ............... ..w... ..._..__ . ._. __. .. . ~, ~ . ~ .. . . , .~~.l,i~P~1C