Resolution-PC 89-31:, j
~
~; ; .
, . . ~ ~ r - r ~r , yr~,'.jm+~~,yJ~~tantitqF ~d"'tti~W ~
' F
. r t ~.~ !+ ~ ' ~
~itl~'+71y ~ ~~~t~.i
'r + 4 ~g; ; !&
,~'`~e~ `~;4
;;;
'y ~
'.t~t
RES~LUTION NU~ P_ Cg~~l
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAFiEIM CITX pr ±y
~H~~ PETIT.ION F'QR RFCLASSIFICI•1TION' N0. 88-~9 ANIITNG COh,'MISSIOTI ''~~
%',`, `~
4 BE GRANTED, AS MODIFIk;D '~
2
WH~fiEAS, the An2lieim Cit;y Plann.ang Commission did xoc~i,ve a
verified petition for Reclassification. Erom B~,ASH MOM~Ny, 2(~8~ gus.iness Ce
Dr.. ~~,g5. Ir~vins. CA 92715 nter -
Linda, #501, Xorb2~ .L.i:~cla, CA ~9~60~er, alld MICHAEI, K. :kA~'IER, 132~p Ynrba
in the City of Anahei.m, Count ~ f ~~~~n~' °f cel taS.n real property situated
Eollows: y Urange, Stat~ of California, described as "'
;;~;
THE WES'.C ON~;-HALF, MFASiJR~U ALONG THE SOCITH I.,INE O.F
LOT 21, OF T.RACT 743, IN ?'HE CITY' QI' A2dAFTEIM, CO(INTY '~
ii!
Q~' ORANGE, STATE O.F CAL'lFORKIA, A~ SHOWN ON A MA~'
QLCORD~D TN BOOK 22 P~,GE 10 OF MTSCELLAN~;OUS M7~pS,
kECORDS OF ORAN~E COUNTY, C.?~LIFCRDTIA. ,
WIiEREAS ' ~
at the Civic Centflr in ~hA Gl~l planning Commission did hold a publ'.c he~ring '";
~~~y oE l~naheim on January 30. 1989 at 1:30 p.m., `':;:
notice flf said puks:lic he~ri.ng having beon duly gY~en as reqtxired by law and in
accordance with th~ provisions or th~ Ariaheim Municipal Code. Ck~a~t~r 18,03,
to haar and consi~dex evidence for and against said pxoposeQ reclas~ificati ~1'
oii
and to i.nve~tigat:e and make Eindings i~n~l recammenclations in r,;,
therewith; an~ aor,naction
WIIEI2EAS, saicl Commission, af.ter due inspec~ion, inves~igatiozi
and study mada by :itself and in its behalf, and af
evi~encQ and reports ~~ffered ~t sax~ ~er due consideration of a.ll
folloN:ing far.ts: henring, d~~,, find and determirie th.e
~-• Thak ttie ~eti.~iox~er progoses r~:classif3.cation of ,rubje~t;
Pr~Perty from ~he RS-A-43,000
(Resi~c~ntial., ~~~Sid~ntial/Aqricultural) zone to ~he RM-1200
Multipl~-~~,~ily) 7nne; iiowever,
det;ermined that the propQrL•y should be reclassif ed to~ RM 2q00 ~ Resi~ission
M~.zltiple-Family) rather tha n R M- 1 2 0 0. d e ri t i a l. ;',
,~
I
for med.ium density Tresi3 ntialala d uses,a~,~Pd~Pro Q~;g~atas subjec~ pro ert
y the CiCy Council on -;
January 26, 1908, and following denial by the Plannin p y '
`~' 19$8• g Commission on January ?~
;~,
`
3• That the prop~ued rer.Zassif.ication oE subject pro ert is ~1
necessary and/or desirable ~'ar the order:ll- and roner p y
communil•y. N; development of th~ ~
~:
i.
4• That the propose~l reclassifzcation o€ sub'ect ~,
~ proper~y does
properly relatQ to the zor~es and their permitted uses locally established in .'.
close proximity to sub'ect p Y ''~
I.,.
J ~ro err and t;o the zones arid their permitted use~ ~4'
gener~lly established throughouL- *_he community.
t
_ . ; ~
0646r
-i-
PC89--31
'~
~ - _ , ~ ~,;~,
~~;--~-- _ , _ , _ . ,, , . J-~ . „" `r,+r,,.',~
~
~~
f ~,f" t
i~
',:?~.
/~10
1
`I
~
5. ihat i:he prapo~ed reclas~iiication oi s ubject propez~ty
reguires the and impr~~rement of a~utting stse~ets in accordance with ~the
Circula~ion El~ment ct• the General P].an, due to th~ anticip ated increase in
traPfic which wi].1 bc gexierated by the in~ensiticar.ioi~ of land use,
6. Thai: no one indicat~d Lr,eir presence at said public hearing
in opposition; and that rxo correspondence was received in opposit~~n to
subject petition.
CALIFORNIA ~PIVIFONMENTAL_QUALITY ,7~~T FIND'IN~C; Th~t the Anaheim
CitY Planning Comrnission ha.s revi~wed the p.roposal t-u reclassify subject
PxQPeT~Y from t,he I2S-A-43,000 (R~sidentiallAgricultural) Zor.e to the PM-~2Q0
(RQ;~ident-ial, Mu1L-iple-Family) to construct a 3-story, 12-unit apartme,.t
complex with waivers of maximum structurzl height and maximum site coverage
on an irregularly-shaped ~arcel of land consis'ting of approximately Q.35 ar.re
having a Frontage oE approximatel~- 65 feet on the norGh si 3e cf Savanna
S cre~t, hav3.ng a maximtnn depth of approximately 24U feet, being locatod
approximately 115 feet west oF the centerline af Marian Way~ and further
described as 3625 Savanna Street; and does hereby ap~rovp thQ Negative
Declar.atioz ugon finding that ir has oonsidered the ~*egative Declaration
together wi.tn any commer~cs received during ~he public review process and
fur~her finding on thG basia oC the initial study anc: any corrun~ntis received
that thex•e :s no eubstantial evidenr,e tk~at the project wxll have a
significarxi; effect on tlie ~nva.ronmenL•.
NOW, THEREFi)RE, gE ;~T RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plann:ing
Commissior~ does hereby grant subject i~etition, as modif,ied, for
Reclassification and, by so daing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim
t~funicipal Code be amended to Qxclude the above-described pLOLerty L•rom the
RS-A-43.OC0 (Resident3.a1, Multiple_Family) Zone snd to incur•porate said
describe~i property into the RM-300Q (Residential, Multiple-Fa~i ly} Zone upon
trse follov irig ponditioizs which axtz hPreby found t~ be a ~ze~cessary
preraquis'te to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the
safeh,y and gen~;ra1 w~lfare of the Citi.zens of the City of A.n~heime
l. That stre~t l.i.ghting facil.iti~s along Savanna StreeC shall be in~~al.lod
as requi=c~r1 by the TTCi.lities General Manager in accordance aith
specifications ~n file in ti-~ C~ffice oE Utilities Gene.ra3 htanager; or
Eh~C security in the form of a bond, certific~te of deposit~ lettor of
cxedit, ox cash, zn ~!n amaunt and form satisfactory to the City of
Anaheim, sha11 be posted witYa th~: C.i.ty to guarantee the stitisfacL•ory
completion of the above-monticned impro~ements. Said security shall bQ
poste@ with the City of Anal:eim prior to the introd uction cf an
ordinance rezoning subjact ~roperty. The above-reguired improvemFnt~
sha11 be installQd prior to occ:upancy.
2. That a fee shall bQ paid t.a the City ~:E Anaheim Eor tree plant3.ng along
Savanna Street S.n an amount as established by City Council resolutio~.
' i `r:
-2- PC89-31
,tj 1
- ~ - . . , . . ,. , ~ ~ r i'~> ~~i'wi
~ 5'
~;.
~
~
r.r~:{." .~''?
'4'(: ~i
3. Th~t pxi.or to intrnduction o~ c~n ordinanco razoning subjoct Qr~perty,
~he 1~~' property owner ,~hali pre~aro und racor~l an unsubordinatec9
covena~ limi~inq occupnncy ~~t each npar~mont unit to no more than tw~
(2) parsons (oth~r than children under the ag~ of two (2) yoazs; p9r
beclroom. Suid l.tmitat;.ion shall be inclu~od in each lease/rental
agreomont. A c~py of tho covenant ~hall bo aubm.ittecl to and approvec7. by
~.he City Attorn~y priur to roc~rdation. A copy ~f tho recorded covenant
sha11 be furnigl~ad to the Zaning D:ivision.
4. ThAt a covonant shall be recor.ded agraeing to provide tho rentor of each
dwQlling unit with wriF.ten inL•ormat.ion c~btai.ned from the School
District(s) pgrr_aining to possibiQ ovorcrowcied condition~ and busing
stahus of r_he school(s) serving the dwQlling unit.
5. That pr.ior Co the introciuccion of an orclinance rozon.iny subject
property, Condition Nos. 1 ~hrough 4, tibova-mQntioned, shz11 be
completed. The pTOV1SlOi15 or rights grax~tod by this resolution shall
become nu71 ~nd void by acL•ion of the Planiiing Commi3s~on unless said
conclitions nrr comp2iad with within onQ year from the t1aCe oF this
rosolution, ~. such further tima as the Ulanni:~y Commission may grant.
6. 'rhat appr~,va1 of this application constitutes approval of the proposed
rQquest only to thc~ extent that it compl:les with i:he Anaheim Municipal
Zoninq Code and any ot:~er applic;ab].e City ragulaCions. Approval does
not inclucle any action ur findings as to cnmplianr.e or approval ~f the
requQat regarding a:iy other applicablQ ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
HE IT FURTHCR RFSOLVED tha~ the Anahc~.im City Planning Commission
doQS hereby firid and determine Chat ar]option af. this Reso].iition is expro~sly
prsdica~~d upon appli.cant's compltanc:e wit2~ each and all of ttie con~itfons
hereinabove ~et forth. Should any such condirions, ur any parC thereof, be
declared .ir~valid or unenforcea.blo by t)iQ final judqmQnt of any court of
competen~c iurisft~ction, l:t:en this Resolution, an~i any approvals hereir~
conkained, ~hall b~ deemed nuil ~3nd void.
THE FOREGbINC RESOLtITTON is Signed ancl ~pprovQd by me this 30th
day of January, 7.989.
; ~.= , .
"~ ~.. ,
_:~'l:~'~~,-,•--~ ./.:c;'~~,r.,r, _
(:ffAIRWOMAN, XNAHF,lM CITY PLANNIt7G COMMISSION
A1'TEST: .
` .l~~.__.
SECR~T , ANAHEIM C T7~ PL NING CONLMISSION
-3-
~ .. , ~,
~~,.
PC89-31
;.
_~~> , .::;~ _ . .~ki;~~~
,:~~
'°Y;~f`~;~Y~`t~'~~ ~~}J.',7~ t Yi4~.AV~' ~Y?~J'rV;~f f.]f 41~r.;Sl (' e K4'd(~i^ 11b fi~u~ ~( 1K1 t
. . _ ~r .. ,: t . . '. ~ . ~_ , r , ~ ~ ~r ~ iti,*!_.,` ~ ~~ Uf;.;px A,E~~'~~'`~+,,,i ~
!4"'~" ~
STATE OF CALTFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAFIEIbf )
•i, Edith L. Harri~, S~cretary of the Anaheim C3ty Plannix~g Commiss3on,
do hereby certily that ~he E~roqofng resalution was pa~se~ and adopted at a
mooting cf tha Anahoim City Planning Cammiar~iar.i held on Januaxy 30, :1989, bv
the following vo~e of ttie members theroof:
r~Y~S~ CO2/~fISSSON~F2S: Bp~AS, HOXDSTUN, CARUSTL:.O, HBR$5T
2v0~S: COhIIriISSIONERS: FELDHAUSY~ M~SSE
ABSENT; COI~tISS.IONERS: NpNE
TN WITNES5 WHEREOF, I havo hQreunka set my ht~nd this 30th r.lay p~
Janunr.y, ~ygg,
1 ~
~-~-~ ~:~ ~-~ /
._._.%":> ~.(.~.c~~ ,=:" ~t~'~?..~ '
-------. ~.I ~-2-,
SECRETARY, ANAFIETM (;ITX PLANNING COMIriISSIQN
'4' PC89-31
' ~:',
.;~
_ , ~ , ~1~~
, .- . ~ ~:- . . . . ~ ~ , . . ~ .... .. . . . . ~rr~~ 6~ 4I~r•fa'r+lAF~7~Si~"/~~~~~
P~a,~1rf.J
~ ~ fz~
~ ... :,'"tr.
~:r
, :yt:
,~t
S~•~ UF CALIFORNxA 1
COUNTY\QF ORANGE ) ss. ~'
CITY UF ~1t~AHET2d ) ` ',.;
..`
T, Editki'~~,. FIarris, Secre~ary of th6 Anaheim City P~.anninc~ Commission,
do hAr~by certi~.x that the foregoinq rosolution was passet~ and adopCed at a
meeting of the Anahoim Ci~y Pl~~nning Comm9.~sion halcl un JanuAry 30, 1989, bX
the following voto o~•.,tih~ members L•he~reof:
AYES: COMMISSTON~RS: BOUAS, IIpYDSTUN, CARUSILLO, FELDHAUS, HERBS7.',
MC,, BURNEY, MESSF,
N'OES: COMMIS5L02TER5: NONE~
AEiSEN'C: CObIIdiS5I0l7FR5 s I10NE ~
IN WTTNESS WH~REOF, I havQ...herc~unta ~et my 2iar.d this 30th a~y of ~
January, 1989.
~- ~- ~
_.. ~ '' - ~.
SFCR~:TdR't~ ANAI~tEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISS~ON
^~
-4-
PC89-31
^~