Resolution-PC 89-32i ! ~~{
~,~ ~}i Mr~'l~., 1S~"~ ~ty 11,'liarthl ~~i~%,tt 3 a~~4,/~7{Y4il~~t'.~i'tl a.~,17~~~t~~~'~!/}~~4~(,~"~~4{~,~~; t ~~Y f~tf~i'~4~~"r,:i~ ~te~ ryi,•:l 1 ~j,Yh rri i.'i~~ t~~ ~
~ ~ . . , ~ 3~~ ~":;4 -:S 1 ~ d ,"ly r } 4~~r,r~ ~ ~Yf~ tii x~1ti~
r~. , ~, ,, ~ rr, ~~, r,,~t~ r~+'n~~'t :,~,J~-~r
~ . ~ ~ , h~~
,~ ~ r,_~f ~~
;:;
~1 ~G~,
,,;:.
~~?,~
R~4r~~.t4~t~.~.~PC89_32
A RESOLUTION OF T~:E ANAHEIM CITY FLANNi27G COhIIrfISSION
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCF N0. 3900 xtE DENTED
WHEItEAS, the Anaheim Ci~y Planning Conunission did receiva n
verified Pet•ition for Variance From AL1,SH MOMENY, 2082 Busi.noss Center Dr„
u].85, Irvine, CA 92715, owner, and MICFIAEL K, FRAIZER, 182Q0 Yorba Linda,
~1501, Yorba Lincta, CA 926C~6, ~gent, of certain real property situated in the
City of Anaheim, Cotinty of Or~nge, State of California, described ~s follows:
THE WEST ONE-FIAL,F, MEASURF.D ALONG THE SOUTH L~NE OF
LOT 21, OF TRA.CT 743, IN TFih CITY OF ANAHETM, COUNTX
; OF ORANGE, STATF; (3F CALIF'ORNIA, .\S SHQWN OIJ A MAk
FFCORDED Itt HOOK 22 PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANI:OUS MAPS,
RECORDS 0~ ORANGE CUUNTX, CALIFOt2tJIA.
WFiEREAS, tha City Plmnning Commission ciid liold a pubZic hearing
at the Civic Centor in tha Ciky af Anahaim on January 30, 198g, at 1:30 p.m.,
noticQ of saicl public hearing hav3;ig beer, duly givQn t~s required by law ancl in
accordanc~ with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal CodA, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consi3Qr evidence fer az~d agains~ s~id proposed variancQ and to
invesl:igate and make findings and recommr~ndations zn conneatic~n therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after duo inspection, investigation
and study made by itselt and in its behalf, and aftar duo cor~sida:ation of all
evi8ence ~nd reports offered aL sai.c~ hearing, doas £ind ~nd det~rmine the
following facts:
l. Ttiat the petitionar proposes waivers of the following ~o
canstrucL a 3-stary, 12-unit ~partmeut complext
(A) ~F~PION 1QL~4_.4~..z41_a - Maxim~Ln.~~r~~~~s~l h~_~~•
.L1 ~t,~r wi hin 1~~_ f~~~ o~E a sinqle-family
residential zone permit;ed;
~.~,S~Q~.~,, at 5 an
_1~~..fg~r proposed}
( B) ~ T T S?~ l~f.:..~!i ~9~ 2:.Q~Q - Ma.~c '~ri~.~~S~.`L~'sj.~~ ~
(,~.~:b pexmitted; ~7~ pr~posed)
~. That Che above-mQnrionod waivers ar~a herttby donied on the
basis thnt there are no special circumstances appl5.cable ~o Lha property suah
as sixo, shape, t~opc,graphy, loca~ion or surroundings, which do not anply to
oth~r identfcally zoned properties in the vicinityt and that strict
applicution nf the zonin~ c~de depriv~ss the properCy of privilQyes enjoyc~a ~v
othQr propez•t:ies ia idnntica.l zoriinq classification in the vicinity.
3. That there aro no exceptional or exL•raordznary circumstances
or conditions ,~pplicable tn the propErty involved ar to th~~ antei~ciec~ use ot
the prc~pQrty that do noc aPp1Y 9an~rally to the proparty or class of uso in
tha same vicinity nnd zon~.
4• xhat the roquested variance is not nocessary for the
preservation and onjoyment of a 3ubstantial propt~rtv rfqht nossessed by other
property 3n the same vicinity ar.d zone, nnd cYenied to the proporty in question.
;:;sr
,,;
',,
A647r
-1~ PC99-32
~"_."'
~'""~~
,.,,,
~
5. That tbe requestec~ variance will be mat~rially d~trimential to ~he
public weltare or injuriuus to the proporty or improvem~nts in suah vicinity
and zone in which Lhe propert;y is located.
6. That nu one inc~ical:od thoir. presenr.e a~c said public hearing in
opposi*_ion; and thati na carrespondence was received in oppcsition to subjeet
peti.t~ion,
.~AL,IFO~TA ~F~V~RONMFNTAL Ot1ALITX ~,CT ~INDI~: That the Anaheim
City Planni.ng Commission 2ias reviewed the propos~tl to reclzssify subjoct
property £rom t~e RS-A-~3,000 (ResidentialiAgricultur•al) Zone to the RM-12Q0
(R~sidentia]., Mul~iple-FamilyJ Zo~ie and to construct a 3-stary, 12-unit
apartment c~mplex with waivers aF inaximum structurul liei~:it and maximum site
covarage on an irregularly-shaped parcel af ].and consi.sting of approximately
0.35 acrQ having a Er~~ntage of appioximateYy fi5 feet on the north side oP
Savanna Street, having a maximu-n c~Qpth o£ a~proximat~ly 240 foc~t, being
locaked approximately 115 foet: west of che ceritor].ine of Marian Way and
furthor de~cribe~l as 3625 Savanna 5treet; and does hereby appruve the
NQgative Declaration ugon finding that it has considered the Nc~gative
Declaration together with any c.emmonts received durinc~ thP publi~ review
process and further finding on tha basis of ~he initial study ~nd any
comments received ~hat there is na substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on th~s environmont.
~~,~~i
i
I~~I
~~
NOW, THEREFORE, BF IT R~SOLVEA tliat the Anaheim Ci~y Planning i:
Commission does hereby deny sabject Petition for Variance on the basis of the `'t
aforemenLioned findfny~. ~
~
'THE FORE~Oi.NG 12ESOL[lTION as siqned and appro~c~d by me this 30tIi
day of Jar~uary, 198y,
;,% ~ ' ~'~1
---~,.. ~fL~j ~ /`l(;%~!-rPti'..~
~ ~.~_.w.r
CHAIRWOMAN, AI~AFIEI1d CI'lY PL,ANNING COMMISS20N
~~
ATTEST:
.
_- __.d.G /~./ ._...____.. ------
SECRF.T.A Y, ANA~iEIM C~TY PLANNIIr'G CUMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNZA ) f~
COUNTY OF OF,ANG£ ) ~S, I±
CITY OF '.NI~H~IM ) ,~~
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anahc~im Ci~y planning ;
Commisssan, do hr~reb~ certiL•y thaL the forogoing resolution was ~assed. ar~d ~'
adopted t~t a megtir.g ~f the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on January ;;
30, 1989, by the following voke of thQ membc~rs thereof: ~'
;,
r
~~.
AYES: COAII~fISSION~,RS: 90UA5, BOYDS'fUN, CARUSILLO, EELDEiAUS, HERBST, ~~
MESSE, MC :;U?.t~EY i'
NUES: COMMISSIONERS: MONE ~',
.A$~ENT: COhQy(ISSIONERS: l10NE }~
IN DiITN~:SS WHBR~;QF, I hnve he~reunto set my hanti Lhis 30L•h day o~ ~
Janu~sry, 1939. ,~
---__---~~`~~=-''`~ ~ ~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLAP:NING COMMISSION - :'~
~i~
;'• '~
,'
~y,'~7 tr~.. ~ . . . . . . . .. , , " . .. . . . . . . . . _ . . ~ . ~ ~7
..
. . . . . . . :.~ ,i~i~i. ~~ .:.~:~;r. . ~ .