Resolution-PC 89-45~
^';
RESOLUTION N0. PC89-45
~
A RESOLiJlIUN OF TH~ APlAHFIM CITX PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR VARTANCE N0. 3899 k3E GRAATTED
WHERFAS, the Anaheim City Plar~ning Commission did receive a
verified Petitiox~ for Varian~~e trom LUCILE M. PERFXMAN AND ~~ANK E. PERRYMAN',
703 N. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, C:A 92805, awner, and KOKO CHAI3G, P.O. BO]C
2868, An~heim, CA 9281~l, agent, or certain real property situaL•~d in the City
of Anaheim, County nf Ordnge, State of California, described as £ollows:
*3EGINNING AT TH~ :IORTHWES'P CORNE~2 QF 56, TFiFVCE
EASTSRLY ALONG THE NOR7'HEFLY LIDTES OF ~OT 56 AND 55,
210 I'EET AND 4 1/2 INCHES TO A POY21T IN TH~ NORTHERL'Y
LINE OF LOT 55; THENCE AT RT~IiT ANGLES SOUTHEkLY AND
PARALLEL WITH THE WGST~;RLY LINE OF LOT 55, A DISTAI~fCE
OF 51 1/2 I'EET TO A POTNT; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGL~S
WESTERLY AND PARALLEL WITFT THL NORTIIE}2LY L' INE 4F LOT
55, A DISTANCE OF 32 1/3 kEET TO A POI:T: THFNCE .d~T
RIGHT ANGL~S SOU~HERLY AND F'AFt:~L' L,EL W?TFI THE WESTERLY
LTN~ OF LQT 55, ~ DIaTA13C~ OF 71 'r'EET TO A POTNT;
THENr~ AT RIGHfi ANGLFS WESTERLY A2TD PARALL,EL WITH THE
S4UTHERLX LINES OF LOTS 55 AND 56, A D?STANC~ Or 178
1/2 FEET TO A E'OINT; T3ZEPTCE AT RIGH'r ANGLES NOFtTH~RT~Y
ALONG TF:E WESTERLY LIN~ OF LOT 56, ~t, DIS'.CANCE C1F 1.22
1/2 FELT x0 THE NORTHWk:ST COFt.dER TIiEREOF :uvD TO 'PHE
FO'1'N'C OF HEGINNTNG.
WHc^,REAS, the City Planr~i.ng Cornmission did holci a public hearing
a~t the Civic Center in tYle C.ity of Anaheim on Januarv 30, 19fi9, at 1:30 p,m. ,
notice of said public haaring hav.ing reen au_y r~iven as required bp larr and in
accordanc~ with the pro~isions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1f3.03,
to hc~ar and consider evxdence ~or and ag~ inst said proposed variance r~nd to
investigate and make findiiigs and recornmandation: in cons-eGtion ther.ewith;
said ~ublic hearinq havinq been continued to the meetinq of FQLruar.y 13, 1g89;
and
" ?~XHiR~RS, said ~ommissiori, a£ter due insgection, investigation
'' and study made ~y itseXf anr~ in its beh~lf, and after due considera~ion o~ all
f`,;~.
;,~. evidence and reporL•s offered at s~id hearing, does find arid determine the
followi.ng facts:
1. That the pptitioner proposos waivers oE the followi:~g t~o
construct a 3-st~ry, 22.-ur.it "affu.rdab].e" apar.tment complex:
M~'
''~i'
Oti80r -1- ~CR9-45 ";~:'''r
;;'~
!~:~::,
~ "ch~
;1';
i %:'i, V
.4:~
{
' ,~':~.f~1
~.
i
y'~
i F .
~I~.. ~ . . . . ~ 1~
~.~~'~lU3~u9,r5~,K'L•~-/'iIl.:.J-,L'.~~ .[....'-.::~: . ... .... ~.:.f~.~:~....:.~._',. .-~r::~.'. :.. '.:'~~,':: ~,.:~,~:.~..... , ~ ... , .,. ' .. .....,. ., . .. .... .. ......... .... ,.:~,/1~v~.7.~
T _ , .~s ~ ,r
r ~~
~~~ ~
r
~ d; ~'1 ~k
~~ , . 4f i~~ I
~.
~~~ S~~ ~l ~.$1.~.`~..Q~.1.O1Q ~ ~~,ID~.~23d,~.~S~..3.~~.~~~~_~~~.~9~.1~E}$_l~ll'~~•
(~.2_QQ aquare feet requireds ~Q.?~Z squaze foet
proposocl) .
I$) ~~1'j2N 1$~~4.062.01J. - Ms~~S~.~4)..~ i^ ~~~.2~•
( 7~.~:~4t~. permi `ted; ~q~pr ~~propased ) .
~ C? ° E T I 2N IQe~. e4~~ ~~~ - ~s~K~~.~_~f.QY~~'s~38 .
(~~ permittecl; §.~v~ psoposod) .
3. That the proposed uso f~ granted pursuant to California
Governmerit Codo Soction 65915.
9. ThaL• rhe above--mon~ioned waivers arr~ hereby granted on the
basis that thera are special circumstancaa applic3blR ta the property such a~
siz~;, ahape, topography, locaL•ion and surround3.ngs which do not a~,ply to othor
i~ent.ically zonc~d property in t~ie same vicirity; and that strict a~plication
~F the Zoning Code deprivos tha property of pri.vileyes onjoyed by othor
properties in the identical zon~ and class:cicat.ion in the vfcin3.ky.
5. That there are c~xceptional or extraordinary cir~umstances
or conditipr.s applicable to Che property involved or to the intended use of
the proporty thar. clo not apply generally to the property or class of use in
the s~.me vi•initv anJ zon8.
6. That the requ~stc~d variance is necessary for the
pr;:servatxon and enjoymant of a substantial property right possessed by other
prc,~erty in L•he samc~ vicinity and zono, and denisd to th~ property in question.
7. That the Z@c~UH3tiHr] variuncQ wi~l noC be maCez•ially
cietrimental to the public welfare or injurious ro the property or improvoments
in such vicinity and zone in. which `he property is located.
A. That no one indicatec3 thcir pregence at said public.
hoaring in oppoRition~ an~1 that n~ c~rrQSpondence was recsive~l in oppositfon
to subject petition.
~~~Q~i~I,~_7- _~NV_IRQT7~tEVT~L Q(~AL T~Y A~,T IN I~Iy: That the Anahe.irn
City 1~]anning Commission has reviewed Che prol~osaZ to concstru~t a 3-story,
22-unit "affordable" apartment complex with wa~vecs of m3.uimum building aite
area pEr dw~lling unit, maximum structural he~iqht and maximwn site cover~ge
on xn irreqularly shaped paccel of land co:zsisL•fng of approxfmateZy 0.52
gcre, having n frontaqe of approximately 122 fo~+t on tho east sfcte of Lemon
Streer. hay.inq a maxfmum depth of approximat~aly 203 feet ancl bejag located
approxima.tely 85 feet nox~th of the centeiline of Elm Street and further
described Ls 318 South Lemc~n Streett and does hereby approvQ tho Neqat3ve
Declaration apo~i fi~nding that it has consid3red the NogativA DECleration
toqeth~r with any cortuncsnts receivecl dur.ing the public z•csvf~w proceas and
further finQing on th~a ba3i~ of the initial st~idy and any cc,~nments roceive~
that there ia no substantial eviclenco that the project wi11 have a
siqniEicant e[~ect on the environment.
-7- PC89-45
eL'~ 'r .... . .. . . ~ . ~ ~ r . ~.:~~
~ t
~ 1~~~ i . . .. ~. . . . , . . i, ~ .. . . . , . t , aii ~~~~
l4~~~
~
NOW, THEREP'ORC, f3E IT RFS~LV~D thaL• tha Anahc~im CiGy Ple-nning
Commission does herQby grant ~ubjoct Pot.xti.an for Varia~nae, upon the
Following conditions which ara hereby F~~ind to be ~ necass~ry ~~reroc~uiaite to
the propo~ed use of the subjoct property in r~rder to presorve tt,~~ a~fety and
c~eneral welfare of the Citizoas oL the City AL• Anahoims
1. That ~+rior to :i~:;uance of ~ building pormit, the approFriate traff.ic
signal assQSSmQnt fee sha11 bo pa.lc] to the City of Anaheim in un amoun~
as es~Cablished by City Council resolution.
2. That a cash p~yment sh~ll be mado ~o the City of. Ant~heim Eor tkia co.:t of
the removal o£ existing street improvements along Lemon Street az~d
rocanstr.uction/constr.uct•ion of full strc~ot improvemanL-s at ~2ie ultimate
location. 5nid payment stia).l be made prior to issuance of a building
permit.
3. That the existing drivc~way on Lemon Street si-all be removQCl and replaced
wir.h sl•andard curb, sidewalk and landsca~ing.
4. ThaF the proposed parking s~ructure des~gn shall conform tu the
Eng3.neering Dtv.ision':c Standard Plan llo. 402-8 pertaining to standard
details for parkirg structui•es and ramp requirements.
5. 'That drainage ~f subjoct property shall be disposea of in t~ manner
satisf:actory to the City Engineer.
6. That rhis Variance is qranted subject to the adoption of a 2oninq
~rdinance in connecti~n w.ith Raclassi~ication No. 8t~-89-36, now pon8ing.
7, That subjoct prupert~ shall obtair, r;ewer sorvice by connecting :.o the
existing ~nanhqle ~~$~ts_L,i4n ~3_.~q~~2.
8. That the property owner shall v~±rify that tho ~xistinq six (6) anch
V.C.Y. sanitary sewer is not in service. I.f not in 3ervice, the sewe~
4ha] 1 be ~bandonaci and a request made to abanaon the existing L-e:~ (10 )
foot easemont.
9. That gates sha'll riot bc~ iy~stalloc~ ac:ross the driveway in ~ manner which
may adversell- affoct vehirular traffic in the adjr.cont public stre~ .
Installation of any gate~ sha11 coreform to the Engineering Division's
Standaril P1an No. 402 and shall be subjc~ct to r.he r~sview and aQpruval of
r.he City Tra:fic Engin~er.
10. That the entire project, inc3.uding tho parkinq garaga, shall be equipged
with firs sprinklers, as required bx the City Fire Departm~»t.
11. That subject property she11 ho served by underground utilitias.
12. That prior to fssuance ~f a building permat, appropriata ?ark ~nd
recraat:on in-lieu fec+s shall be p~id ~o the City of Anaheim in an
amount us cietorminocl b~ the C.ity Council.
- ~.~~r~-.''. ~"+',Y•,
_3_ PC89••45
~i~pr,¢:
~~~ ~
r r~r 1S'~}
~ }Y7¢~~
. . . . .,. ,.. ~
'13. That bo~h, sp~aces in ~a~ h pair nf tandem parking spacey shall De ~ssigned
to the same clvrel].i7-g unit.
14. That in tht~ event a parcol ma~a is not recardod combining the ~wo (2)
exiating ].ots, the logal property owner sYiall furnish ~he Zoning
Division with a r.opy of a r.ecordod covonanL• ar,3 agrec~ment in a farm
approvec] by the Ci~y Ahtornoy agroeing Ca hold subject prnperty as one
(1'~ parc~I.
15. That prior to conunencemon~ of structural framing, on-sitH Eire hvdrants
shall l~e in~tallera ar~d chargod as required and approved by the ~ity ~ire
Aepartment.
].6. That all lockxble i~c~clo~3trian and vehicu'lar accoss gate3 shall be
cqu.ipped with a"Icnox box" device, i.f required by the City Fire and/or
Yolico Department.
17. ThaC trASh storage areus shal: be provided and maintain~d in a location
acceptab]e to the Streot Maint~nance and S~nitation Division and in
accordanco rrith approv~rd plans ou file with saicl Divisien.
18. That all a.ir conditioning facilities ai~ct otlz~r roof and ground mounte~
equipment shall be properly shielded from view, ancl the sound buffer.ed
frqm adjacent rc~sid~ntial properties.
19. ThaY. pciur to issuance of a building permit, sntisfactory evidQnce shall
be presonL-od to the Building bivision sho~~+ing that the proponed prcject
is in conformanca with Council Policy Number 542 "Sound AL•tenuatio~ in
Residential ?rojecr.~" and with rroise Insulz-t,ion Standardss specifiea in
the California Administrativa Code, Title 25.
20. That a six (6) foot high mas~nry blor.k w~+11 shall be constructed and
maintained nlong the north, east and seuth property lineas excepting ~hQ
front ~etback whore the wall height sha~l r.ot excesd three (3) feot.
21. '~hat aIl p]urnbi~ig lacated un thc~ ext~r~ior of the bui.ldinq shall be
properly scroened by architecturc~l dovices and/or l~+ndscaping.
22. That prior Co issuance~ of a building permit, L•he legal property owner
shall enter in~o a recosded agr~emc~nt with the C.ity of Anaheim purausnt
t~ Ca~i£ornia Gover:tm~nt Code Section G5915 to pro~ide that ten perc~snt
(]0'~) of thg permitted number of residential unita shall be ronted as
very low inc,ome 'nousing rss de£ined in California Gcvernmont Code SoctiAn
659z5 and with appropri~-ke rental controls as approved by the City of
Artaheim for a period of nut losa than thirty (30) yenr.s from tho dtstcs of
issuance of occupancy ~ermit~.
23. That L•he basement level c~verQd packiny shal.l be designed to be more
than fifty percen~ (50~) below tho natt~ral grade level of subjoct
groporty as measured at the exterior walle of the building, and ahall be
constructed as such.
_q_ PC89-45
;,,
..~~
~ . . . . . . , . . ~ ' . ~. .. . . . ~ ~ , . ~... , ~~~ ::1 ~ li~~.
~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
~
~~
2~l. Th~tit subject pr~Forty shall be dAVelopt~d substsntia~.ly in accordsnc:e
with plans and specific:a~ion~ on fiJ.e with ttie C3.~X of Anaheim mar.ked
Revision Nos. 1 oP Exh3bi~ No. 7., a~nd Exhibit No. 2.
25. Thut pri~r to issuance of a bui.ldinq pQrmit, or within a peri~d oE onp
(1) _year from lhe da~o oE this resolution, whir,hever occurs first,
Cond~.tion Nos. l, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14, 19, 22 and 23, abo~~e-menkioned,
shall be c~rnplied with. Ext~nsiona For furthor time to complete oaid
conditions may be granted in accordaiic~ with Section 10.Q3.090 of the
Anz,he3m Municipal Code.
26. That prior to fin~l building and zoning inspectiona, Condition Nos. 3,
5, 7, 10, 11, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23 and 24, above-men~~onsd, shall be
complied with.
~ 27. That approval of this appli,.atior~ constitut~s approval of thr~ QroFosed
~ requPSt only to h.he extent that it comQlies with tho Anaheim Municfpa].
; 7,oriing Code and any othor appaicable City regc~lat3ons. Approval does
not include any action or Findings as to compliance or approvaZ of the
' requ~st regardiilg any other appli.cab].e crdinance, regulation or
..
" requ3reroQnt.
RE IT FURTHFR RESOLVEA that the Anah~im City Planning Commis3ion does
hereby find and Qetermine thal adaptiozi of this Resolution is ~xpressly
~re~icahQd upnn mpp7icant's complianae with each and ail of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. ~hould any sur.h conditions, or sny part thereof, be
aeclared inval#.d or unenforceable by the final judgmont oP sny court of
competent jurist7iction, thc~n this R~solution, a:id any approvals herein
containod, shsll be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLtlTIDN is signed and ~pproved by me this '13th day of
I'ebruary, 1989.
r~: . ~
/
~ ~ ~ .,
- ~ ~ ~~; ,•~" r :!i~ ~~;, t=TL-
CHAIRWOMANf'~.ANAHF.~IM CITY PLI~NNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: ~ ~ /
~_ , ~.-~ ,~~ --,"
._ ~-~~~--,~._ - . ~~-
SECRErAR'1, 1~-NAE;EIM CITY F~LANNING CONQrfISSION
'5- PC$9-45
,,r
~ ~ ~,~
,, y~
1
~i~~
,,.
'',~'I
..'
~~
<;;
'.r
.w
; ~.q;
;fi
~~~
~
-6- kC89-45
~ .. . .
STATE OI' C,ALIFORNTA
• g g p ssQa an a up e at a
meetinq of tho An~h~a.m City Planning C~mmissia.~ hold on February 1~, ].98~, by
thQ following voLe of thQ membQrs ~horc~o£:
AYE~: CGMMISSIONL~RS: BUUAS, CARZISILLQ, E'ELDHAUS, HL~RBST,
MC HURNEX~ MEuSE
NOES: COMMISSIONER~: NOI1E
ABSEI~Ts COD4SSSSTONERS: BpXDSTL`N
IN WYTNESS 41HERGOF, I have hereunto set my ha2iit this 13kh day of
February, 1989.
.
.~ ^~~ / ~,~ ~- .
_.~~ '`.'_~l~~e:~_~!^--` ~ /~ --~~/~/~t--..~
SL•:CRETAI2Y, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~
~ . ' ~ 4iQ ~'`~,~.~ilSilr~
~ ~ ~f.
~ rt;
,.;~;
~ :~
~~'~
COUNTY OF OkANGE ) ss. ',f.
CITY Or ANA.HETM ) k
,~'
z, F~.ith I~. ~Iarr.is, Searetary of the Anahoim C:ity Planning Cammission, '"i~'~
tio hereby cerLi~y tha~ chc~ fore oin reEOlution was a rl Q t d KI
~ ~'!
~~
~ ':~r
,,~
~~~
~!r
' ~~
F, ~~,~