Resolution-PC 89-501 F : r~k fle~~!4f7~~.~~
' ~r,~~
~~,
~ ~ J
'.` [
~.~.-~~~.~T~~l..~Q e~~~J~
A R~SOLUTION O1~ THE AN1-HEIM CITY PLANNlNG COMMISSIQN
THAT PETITION F'UR CONAITYO.IAL US~ PEIttdIx NQ. 3112 BE bENIEA
WHERF.AS, ~he I~nAheim City Planning Commi~sion did receive a
verified Petition for Conditional Use kermit from SANTA FS LA.ND IMPROVEMFNT
COIQPANY, 3230 E. Imperial Highway, Suita 100, Ar.oa, CA 92621, owner, ayent
for certain real property situatod in t.he City o~ Anahaim, Coun,ty of Orange,
Stato of Califo.rnia, descri.b~d as:
B~xNG A SUBAIVxSION OF PARCEL 9 I~ND THOSE POR~rrorts OF
HANCUCK STREET, LA PALMA AVENUE At~D MANASSERO STREET
OF PARCEL MA? N0. 83-•227 ZN THE CTTY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE 0[' CALIF~RNIA, AS SHOWN ON A
MAF FILED IN BOOK la4 YAGES 3'10 6 OF' PARCCL MAPS, IN
THr: OFFICE OF TEIE C~UIJTX RECORI~F.R UF SAID COUNTY,
LYING WITHIN TENTATIVE PARCLL MAP 87-150.
WHBRRAS, !:he City Planning Commission did hotd a publia hearfng
i at the C.ivic Center in the City of Anaheim rn February x3, 1489 at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of uaid publi~ hearing havinq bean du.ly qiven as requfred by 1»wr and in
accordanco With the provisions of rho Anaheim tdunicipal Code, Chaptier 10.03,
to heTr and cunsi~er eviclence for and against said proposed condttional use
permit and to investiyate and make Eindings ar~d recommendationa in cunnection
L•herowith; t~nd
WHEREAS, said Commission, aftex due inspection, invest.ic~ation
anr~ study made by itself anft in its behalf, and aftor duo consideration of al2
evidence ancl reports ofEered at said hearinq, does tind and determine ths
f.ollowing fa~L'S:
1. That thQ pc~titioner requosts approval of a Conditional Use
Permit under authority of Code Sections 18.61.050.605, 18.61.050.617., and
'18.61.050.615 to permit ~ mixed use cor.ter consisting of
"industrially-re].at~~l" rotail shops, a Eood court, ai~d a r,h.fld dny care
facility, ond witti ~saivor oE rhe fallowir~g under authorir,y of Code Sor,tion
18.06.080:
+,
$~C~IONS 29.Qb~~Q~..4.~3 - ~~'l~LS?.41~1~~~.~.f.~F.~9~~~~,5.•
~,~~,Q~~~~ (~~ reqa.ircrd: 7,Q$ proposed)
,,
~@.~5~~.2~St~~~
a s~-~~!~S-?L.~9.~~_~~Q
~
~
?. Thut tne i•equf~gC~d wafver is horeby dc~nied on the basis
thaL• the parkiny waiver wi.ll C8Li9Q ~n inc.rease in trafES.c conge~C3on ,in tho
immediete vicinity nor AdvQrsely afEecr eny Adj~fn3ng ls~nd us~s and grantiri
o£ the parki.ng w~~.vc~r un~er the cond3tion~ imposed, x~ ~n
detrimexit~l to the peace, health, s~feey and ~;~Rner~l welfare of ~he c3tizons
of tho C.ih Y~ will be
y of Annhoim.
3• Tha~ Che prop~3~~ u~Q zs horebv denied on the b~sis tha~ it
is not appropriate for the area.
land uso3 and th~ yrowt;l~ ~~ nci devc~lo~,m~nt of~ theaareaQ ia wt,L~H~ s tih~_ ad;oininq
to be locaFeci, _ _ _
5. That the ,izU and shapo oP the ~ite proposec~ Por ti~e use is
not adeqaate ta allow Gha full dev~loFm~nt o.f the proposecl use in a mHnne
dotrimental to the p~r~.iculax aren nnr to Ctie peace, health, sa~~ ~ not
.
; gQneral welfare of the Citiz~ns of tha City o~ Anaheim, tY and
~ b• That the granting of the C~nditional Use Pt~rmit under the
condition~ imppse~, ~. f any, wi.ll be detr.imontal to the e~~~
and general welfare~ of• the Citizens ~f the (:ity of Anaheim, ' health, safety
?• xhal• the tratfic gonerated by th~ proppsed use *ai11 impase
t~n unduR burden upon thQ n~reets and tiiqhways designed arid improvod to carry
the traffic in the aren.
8, x1^at nc anQ indic.atc~d thoir pre~Qnco st saiQ public hearing
in oppo~itionj and that no corrQ~po~~Qt1CQ W83 r~CQived in oppositiori Lu the
subject petitioi~.
~~~'..4~3~IA ENV,~t~Q~~~Ai~ Q I.I'~Y_.pST .~~~~: That thc~ Anaheim
City Planning Commissaon ha;~
. reviewed tlie pro~osal to pgrmit a mixed use
cenCer consist•ing o~ "fndustrially-relatod" retail shop$, a fooa court, and a
ch:Id day care faCflity wiCh way~er of, rninimum n
rectangularly-shapeA ~arcel of land consisting d~ ar of ~arkiiig spaces on a
locate~] at the nor~heast c~rnec• of La Palr~a Avenue ar.dpHancock Street29havin8
apprQx~rnute frontages ot 809 feet on the north side of La Palma Avenue and
530 feet on the oast sidQ of Hancock Sr_rcct; at~d ilnes hereby anprave the
Negat.ive DeclarAtion up~ei finding that zt has cunsidereA the z7oqative
Declaration togather with any commor.ts recefved during the pub'li~ review
process and further finding on ~he basis of tho initia?
commonr.g xQ~$ived that ~horo is no substantial evidence that the ~proj Ct wi11
have a s.ignificant oFfQCt on ~he onvironment.
NOW, THER~FORE, E3E IT P.LSOLVF,r~ th~t the An~n~im Ci~y Planning
Cammiss.ion doQS hereby deny subject F~Ptition t'or
the ba3is of tt~e aforemc-ntionc~d findings. Condit.tona2 Use Permi;•„ on
_2_
,• , , ;
FC89-50
~
,
r i~
~,
~,~~~
~'xi'y"ui~J°ifQl:1?~1~~~tn .+ i_'~jS fwt'.~,:A'~!11~e1 ~r~,riikA~7 f,J'~A~~i .i.'•w:~`"t~~'4:YWij{'~ ri~"x~~¢~~a ,~~~,w v ll.~ ; f ~iH ~W
F~~ , . . . _ .. . . SO!~_ _,_ _..~ -''•~. ~ ~~~1'~ "'~:~~~. . "~;' ~' `;:Q 1~ ,'.lli~S~t ~~MC~'~~~"rtYr~,l~ry~f~~t~4'-~
~ ~ , . . : . ~'~~
,:•j ~j'7'"`~/!1 ,~y,~~y . . _ .~r~
•J . . . ~~ ~ ~.~ ~,
~i 1Pm1J~1 . ~''
i ~'
~9
~,.~i
i.~,
BE IT FURTHER RESOVRD that the Anaheim City Planning Commiasion ``~
tloos 7~t~reby deny subjact PQtiCion. for ~ond3t3unal Use Nermlt, an ~tza basis of
the aformenhionecl Fin~.ings.
:~i
THk: FAREGOIt7G RESG.LUTION is si.gndd and approved by mo thi3 13th ~"
day of E'ebruary, ~.g8~.
^ "~~~;:.«~,~~.._. .~~ ~~ :;t~,.-.r.,y~...-
CHAIRWUl~tAN, A~NAHEIM CITY PLANNING CA2~SISSIpN
i'
ATTEST: ~~ . /
~ ~.~..~f' /~ ~-- .
~ _ _. ~ . _ -~-~.Gl~t,~...~., -
SECRGTARX, ANAHSIM CITY PLAI~lNI23G CUh4dISSI~`N
STA'PE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUtd'rY OF' ORANGE ) Ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Lditli i., IIarris, Secre~ary of. the Anaheim Citt Planning
(:nmmis~ion, do hdreby certify thaC the forpyoing re~olution was passed and
r~dopted at. a me~~ing of tho Anahoim City Planuing Cwnmiss.ion held on Fdbruary
1~. 1?Q9, bv tY.e following vote oE the members thQreof:
AXES: COMMISSIONERS: SOUAS, CARtISILLO, FELUHAUS, II~:P.PST,
MC BURNEY, MESSE
NVES: C0.'~iTS5I0Nr,RS: :lONE
A3SF_NT: COMMIS5IONERS: HOYDSTU~1
It7 WITrIESS WHER~OF, I have hQreunta sc~C my hand this 13th day
c-f February, 1~D9. (~
_ -t" ~ „~ . / ~~ ~-_ /
-,~~ ~ -~-~.--~.J _ /~ ,. ,C=L~~'U~h___
SECRETAEtY, ANAHETM CITY PLI~NNING CO*41ZcSI0N
-3- ~'C89-50
~:~
1
_ , , ~,,•~~a~%