Resolution-PC 89-56f~
~3.~S.~u.'~..~^J~~.,_ '~.t3 9 - ., 6
fi~~
A RCSOLUxION OI' T1iE ANAFIEIM r;[TY I~LAtdTTIZ1G COMMISSTON
TIiAT PFTIT70N ~'OR VARIANCE N0. 389h BE GRANTEb
SVFIEREAS, the Az~~h~im City F'lanning Commission dicl receive a
verified Petition for Variaxice from DSELODrE Atr'tI SWALLOW ANL GL~IIDYS F. SWALLOW,
644 Sakth Webster StxeHt:, Anaheim, CA 92804, owner, anCi CCNTURY WEST
DE;VELOPMENT, Attn: Robe.rt C. Torres, 8141 Kaiser i3oulaaarc', ~207, An~ho3m,
CA 92808, agent for certa3.n real proparty situated in the City of Anaheim,
.:ounty oE Orange, SL•ate of Caliiornia, describQd ds follows:
LOT 1'l OF TRACT N0. %96, IN TIiE CtTY OF ANAHEIM, AS
PER MAk~ RECOT~DED IN BOOK 24, PAGE 28 OF MTSCF:LLl-.NEOUS
MAPS, IN TFiE OFFICE OF TFIE C~•iUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commi.ssion dzd hold a gublic hearing
at the Civic Center in the City of Anahc~im on January 30, 1989, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public hearinq havine~ been c3uly given as requ3.red by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Munici~a]. Code, Chapter 1A.~3,
to hoar and consicler ovidonce for and agninst said prop~se3 variance and to
.invost.iqata and makQ ~indings and recummend~+tions in connection therewiths and
said public hearinq was continued to the mee~ing ~f February 27, 1989; and
WHEREI-S, Qaid Commission, alter duo inspection, investigation
dnd study ma~o by itself and in its behalf, ar.d aEter due cansideration of all
c~videnca and reports offerdd aL• s~id hearing, does f.ind and determine the
following £acts:
l. xhat the petitio~ier roquesls waivec of the Eollowing to
con~truct a 3--story, 20-unit apartment complex:
SECTI tO 1~ lf}_~4 .062. Q1~ - M~xim~yn~; -ructur~l k~Qic~h+• ..
and 1Qt.~~,Q¢~_,~.1~ ~._g.~o~ry. within 150 feet of RS-720A residential
zoning and 2~Q~zes ~verall permittr~l; ~_,~t.oz~g,g
at 50 foet proposed)
2. Thzt the ab4ve-mentioned waiver is hQreby qrante~l on the
basis tihat there are spacial circumAtances applicable to the proporty su:h as
aize, shape, topography, loce~tion and surxot:ndinys which do not apply to other
identically zonec] proporty in the same vicinity; a~ad Chat str~ct applicati.on
of the 7oniag Code c]ep.~ives the property of privileg~s ~njoyed by other
properties .. L•he identical zone anfl ctassiffcation in the vicinitv,
3. That the req~~esCod ~rzivor is hareby ~ran~ea subject to the
p~3titioner's stipulation Ar_ the public hearinq to install and permanently
mAintt~in a drip irr;.gation syatem in alt planter Ar4ASt ancl Eurther rh~t a
5~foot hiyti conc:•ato block wall wir.h a.:-foat high planter box on top shall be
provided on all paC`os on r_he nurth sfde of the projectt an8 that the wall on
the norih proporty lir.e uhall bQ a total of six (G) foot higts on thu adjncent
neiqhbora' xic]e oE the rrall witb the grade level of subject prope:ty beinq
lowerecl two (2) ~eet with a new reta~i~ir.~g xall ar~ 8-fook hiyh wall on the
subject propurty aicie of tho wall.
~.~~
,~r;~i
~ ,"
~
f
(.
t~;`
i _.
~
4695r -1- PC89-sE
Y ~~
f~ '} r' N~
~ ~~.~
~ ",.
h. T2iat thore ~re dxcepti.uz~a1 or oxtraordinary circums~ances
or condiL•.i.ons Applicable tu the prope.rty invalved or to t:he intanded uHe of
the propacr.y that do no~ apply gonerally to tho pruper~y or class af use in
tho 3ame vic:~.nil.y and zono.
5. That tho rc~questod var3anct~ is neces~ary fcr the
proservaCion und enjo~ment of a substantial p:opartX right poasessed by oY.her
property in the samo vicinity and z~ne, arid deniod to the proper~y in questi~x-.
6. That tha roquested variance, as q:anted, will not be
materiall~l dQtx•ime~ital to the public wal.Eare or in}urious to the pf~opPrty or
improveme~~ts i.n such vicinity and zone in which the praperty is located.
7. Thac six (6) peuple indicahad their prosonce at January 30,
1989, public haaring anci two (2) poople ind3cat~d there presence at the
I'obruary 27, 1999 publa~~ hearing in opposition; and that no corrospondar~ce was
receiv~c: in opposition t~~ subjoct pot:tion.
_ AL~'~tN~~F~NVTRQNMENx~~_QiLL1xY ACT FINpIkIGs That ~he Anaheim
City Planning Commist~ion has reviewe~d the proposal tu reclassify subjoct
propc~rty from the RS-A-43,000 (Res.identic~l/Agriciilt•nt~al) Zone te the RM-12f30
(ResidenC.:a1, Mulitple-Fa,mily) Zone an~l to construcr a 3-story, 20-•ux~it
apartment complox w3th waivor of rnaxim-un structura]. height oa ~i
roctangulnrly-shaped parcel of larid cor~sisting of approximate]y U.73 ac:re,
hnvin~ a frontage of ap~+roximately 'l18 EQet an; the oi.•t side of Webster
Avenue, h~ving a maximum darL•h of approxtmately 270 fes;., being lqcated
approximatQly 183 feg~ sou~h of the cen~erline oi C1~AZbraok Lane and furthor
described as 6n4 South WebstiQ= Avenus; and ~ioeA hereby approve thA Neq~tive
L~clarotion upon finding that it has considQred the Negative Daclaration
toge~her with any comme:~ts roccs3ved during the r~ublic review process and
fur~hec finding on rhe hcsi~ of th~ initial stucly and any comment.s receivod
that therc is no substa~i~ia1 eviclc~nco that tho projoct will have a
signific.~nC offect on the 4nvironm~nt.
NOW, THEREFQRE, D~ IT RESOLVBD r.hae the Anf+heim Cfty Planning
Commission doos hereby grant silbject Potition for Vaxiance, u~on the
followinr~ cundltions uhich :~re hereby found to be a necessary pxer4quieit~ ~r
the proposed uae oE the subjQCt prope: ty 3n o:cior to preserve t,'~o ~afety ancl
qenor~l welEare ot the Citizons ot t!-o :ity of Anaheim:
1. That priar tu issuanco oE a building p~rmit, the ~ppropriste traffi~
sigual a~sossmenc :ee 3ha21 be paid to the City uf Anaheim in an amo+ant as
astab:lished b~r Ci.r.y Gouncil rQSOlutfon.
2. That gates :sha:l not be in~called acroos the driveway or in a maaner ahich
m~y o,dvQrsely affecr, vahir.alar trt+ffic in the a~jacent public gtreKt.
T.r,stalla+:fon of any gateo shall confarm ta tha R:.:3ineerinq Division'e
St4nd.ard Pl~,n No. 402 anQ shall be subject to tho reviEw anfl approval of
tha City Traffic Enqine~x.
3. That drUinage of snbject property shall bv dispo3ed oE in ~ manno= .';I
sati~fuctory to the City Engineer.
~2- FC89-56
,~~~
a
••~
~
~ + 7. I ~ ~\~y~~~pj,~
~ ~~i~ ~.i~
"it
A. Tk-at subjc~ct property y2itil'1 bE servod by un~ergr~und utilities.
5. That this Variance is gr-antad subject to ~he adoption of ~he Zoning
Ordiriance iri connQCtion wi.th Rocl~s~ification Nr~. 88-89-35, now penfl3ng.
6. That prlor L•o issuanca of a buildinq permit, appropriate park and
rRCrea~ion in-lieu tees s1~a11 be p~,id to thr~ City of Anahdim in an amount
as determined by tho City Cuunr;il.
7. ~l:at prior tu iss+~auce of a builciing perm.it appropriate £ee~ due for
pri.mery mains, sha11 be paic~ ta the WaCer Utili~y Division in accordance
with Hu16s 15A ancl 2U of th~ Wator Utility Ratos, Rules and ~2egulatipns.
8. That tha antir~ prujQCt, 3.ncluding parkirig g~irag~s, shall b~ fire
sprinklaroc~, as raquireu by the City Fire Departmant.
9. Tl.at prior t_o commc~ncement of structural framing, fire hydrants shall be
installed and charged as required and apgrovad by tho City Ffre Department.
10. T2iat all lockabl~a pedestrian and vehicular access gat~es shall b. eguippad
with a"kr.ox box" device, if required by ~tie City Fire and/or Police
Departments.
11. Tliat trash storage area~ sh~ll be rQloc~ted away From he resiQential area
and providod ancl mainkain~d in a locati.ou ac~Qp~a:b23 to ~IlR SGroe~.
Mazntenance and Sanitati~n Aiv:isi4n and in ~ccordance ~+rith approved plans
on file with said Division.
12. That all air conditioning facilities and o~her roof tind ground mounted
equipment shall be properly shiQlded fr.om view, and t,~'~e sound buf~ered
£rom a~ljacent residentffll prn~ertios.
13. :hat a~ix (6)-foot high masonry block wall shall be constr.ucted and
mnintainod along the north, east and south propQrty lines exceptxng ~he
front setback whsre the wall heigh~ shall not exceed thz•ee (3) feet; sY~d
furthor, that th~ wall on the nocth properLy liue ~sha:~ bo six (6) foet
high as moasured on rhe actjacent neighbors' side and eiglzt (8) ~oet high
as measur~cl on the subject propE:ty side because th9 grade level of
subjecC property shall be coverQd two (?.) feot and a 2-fuot: hsgh retaining
w~ill constructed.
14. '~hat buflding plans shal~ show thati an} proposed parking t~rea lfghting
:Eixtur~s adjacenk L-c ~ny r.esidenrial propert;~ shall be down-ligY.ted Nith a
maximum heiqhC of tuelve (12) fc~et. Said liqhtinq fixtures shall ba
directad awa,y from adjacent residontial proFerty 13nes to proCect the
residentinl fute~~rity of th~ area.
15. Tht~t !3lib~OCt pr~pQrty~ sha11 be cleveloped ~ubstai-tially in accoi~dance with
plans ~r,d speciEicrations on file with the City of Anaheim marked &eviafon
No t. of Exhibit Nos. ::, 10 and 1?., ard Exhibit Nos. 2 through 9 and 1].;
~~.i.c'ed, h~wovcr, that all ba].conies on tho north side of the project
~r~alJ. be encloaed k•ith five (5) foot hlgr, masonry block wa'lls, with one
(1)-footi hiqh plaiiters boz on top; And futthor thak tho north walt on the
norCh proporty liue shall ba conacructo8 as snectfied by condition No. 13
herein.
-3- PC89-56
~ f . . . ~~ ;': , ~,~~
i :'
,t , ;+1 ~ ~,vl,
', :,?'•:t
;~r
16. 'rhat prior to issuance oE a buzlrling ~ermih, or w3th3n a poriad of one (1)
yeax Erom the date of thfs reaolution, whiche~ver occurs £ir~t, Condition
Nos. 1, 5, 6, 7, 13 and 14, above-mention~d, shall be complied witn.
Extensi.ons for fur~her time to cornplete said conditions may bo granti.ed in
aacordance with 5ection ].8.03.090 a~ the A.naneim Municipal Code.
17. That Z..ior. to final buildi.ng and zoninc~ inspections, C~ndiLion rTos. 3, 4,
8, 11, 12, 15 and 18, herein, shall be complied with.
18. That a drip :trrigation system sha?~ be installed and percnanently
maint~ixied in all pi.anter arQas.
19. That approval of this application consL:itutoa mpproval of the propose8
r•equest on'!y to ~he extQnt that it compl.ies with tho Anaheim Municipal
Z~ning Code ~ncl t~ny other applicable rity reyulation~. Np~rpval does not
include anj ~.:tion or tinding5 as~ to compliance or apriroval of tho reqt-esL
regarding any other 3pplicable ordinance, regulat.ian cr requixement.
BE iT FURTHFR RESOY.~JED *txat t;hP Anaheim City Planriing
Commission does hereby Eind and d~termine that adoption r~f this Rasolution is
express~y predicated up~n applicanc's compliance with each. and a11 of, the
conc~itions hereinabove sat farth. 6Yiould any such conditions, or any part
tr.ez~eof, b~ declarecl invalid or unenforcc~able by the~ final judgment. of. any
cour~ of compe~ont jurisdiction, thon this ResoliiL•ion, ancl any ~,~~provals
herein containAd, shall be deom~d null and vaid.
THE FOR~GUING R~SOLUTION is signed anti approved by me thas 27th
day oF ~'~br~~ary, 1989.
_ r~
~ ~;~..~... ~__..G.~/ <: .Y_`.,•~~1.
CEiAJRWOMAN, ANAHEIM CtTY PLANNTNG COMbiJSSION
.~.TTEST: ,
~-
. ~~ ~ ..~'~-L-`_-~- --_
SECRETAR , ANAFCF:[M CITY PLANNTNG COt~4dTSSION
STAT£ OF CAT.IFORNIA )
COUNTY UF QRANGE ) ss.
CITX OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L'. Iiarris, Secro~ary of the Anahoim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certit'y that the foregoinq rosolution was passed and
adopte8 t~t a meetiny of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on Februat•y
27. 1989, by the fo].l.owing vote of the members thar~of:
AY~S: COhIIdISSY9NER5: BOUA~, BOYDSTUN, CARUSTLLO, FELDHAUS, MESSE
NOF;S: CUbII•fICSIOtrRRS: 1~IONE
VACAN'P: COhASISSIONERS: T'AO SEATS
IN WI'rNESS WH~:REOC, I have hare~anto set my iiund this 27th day cf
Febru~ry. 1989.
~~ ~~~ ~ ~~
_ _ ~ ~.,,~,~ __.
;r~ SCCRETARY, ANAHEIM CI~'Y PLANNING CQMMYSSTON
:+ -4- l'C89-56
:,
{ .I
." i . _~ `Y ~~
~~ ,. . . . ~r.
.. .
~ :.:.; 3 ... _... . ~.., ~ ., . . . ... ~~ .'. ~:~ a.:; ~.- . ~., . ~ h
r „~ia, k.r.:~
., i ~... . . , . . . . . .. . . .
~ ~r ~ tv ~~,~~1 ~ ~y
~ ;; ~ F 1\y!~,