Resolution-PC 89-58~,SNAaSrV,ySM;ZFniRfe;+ vT467,';;~~~'a3YY!?tPt'!y ,ry F• ;i'!y ~ ..t1' , !.~~4v ~ ~y' r,ji ' . .1 • . i...,. r:~:l, aa .t;?'+"~i° lti~,,,l~ii{'f~`(~~',+~$'C
. . , ,,.t~ ~.~'~~'~
~~a +~~
~ :i ~j~~!~j ~ ~`;
';;~
RE,50L 1'I N Ivf~ PC~9-5A
A RESOLUTION OF T.EiE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNTNG C02~1ISSION
R~COMMENDING TO THE CITY COUN(.'IL ADOPTION OF
GENCRAL FL.?~N AMENbMF,NT N0. 2•49 - LAND USE ELEMENT
W:•iGRFA5, the City Council oI ttie City of Anahoim did acaopt tkae
Ar~ak~eim General Plan by kesoluLion No. 69R-649, showing i:he gensral
clescription and exten~ af possible Euture development witliin the City; and
WHCREAS, the Gener~l Plan. prnvi.des an official guicie ~or fufi.ure
devQlopment o£ the city and is intQadod to promote an arrangement oi land
usea, highways and public s~rvices wh9.ch proyide sequenePc! developcnent ianci
adaquate pz•~visions f.or public improvemQnts; ancl proposes the general usago of
land and specifies a range of dovelopment intonsity an8 densi~y; and
hFiCREA5, r.,ursuan~ to a rwquest fx~om thQ property-ownex• fur a
~ Gen~ral Plan st~.i~y to zedesignate the junior high schoo], site locat.ed a.long
1ti; th~ souLh central bourzdary of the Sy~camore Canyon development to Hillside Lo~v
~, Densi~y RPSidential ancl to reloca~t tha park site designaL•ion easterly,
adjacent to Weir Canyon Road, staff rrepared a General P].an Amendment for the
~28.9-acre 5ycam~re Canyon Specific Pl.a:~ (SP8k~-7.) dhvelo~~nent area locatod
southeast,: of the southerly terminus of Weir Canyon Road, bounded An the
nor~hwest by the East Hllls Plannod Community, on the southoast by The 5ummi~
of Anaheim Fiil~.s Spec:ific Plan devolopmont, and an thw ~outhwes~ by The
Highl~nds at Anak~eim ~iil`.s Specific Plan devQlapmen~; aild
WHEPEAS,
to the provisior~s
~nvi roi~nental Impac t
on February 9, 198E3,
Paan (SP08-1) is
documontatzon; and
tiie Planniny Departrnent deemed it appropriate, ~uxsuant
o:C the California Environmental Quality AcC, that
Repor* Pto. 283, previously certified by the City Council
in conr.ection with appr~val of Sycamorc~ Can.yon SpQaific
aclequate ta s~rve as the requirQd environmental
~
i^T'H~&GAS, the Anah~im City P'lanning Commission did hold ~ public
hearing at the Civic ~enter in the City oY AnahQim an Febr~aary 27, 1989, at
~', 7.:30 p.m., noti~~ of s~sid u~lic, hoarin havin been dul
P g y y givc~n as re~uirerl by
,f' 1aw and in uccordance with the provis~ons of zhe AnahQim Municipal Cc~e, i
Chapter lEi.03, to hear and considar ~~ridance for ana against said pro~osod ,`i
General Plan Ar,iendment and to investigate ~nd make findings and
;ti r~commP.Zdatioixs in coiin~ction therewith; ~snd
W.HEREAS, said Commission, atter due inspoction, investigati~n anci
study made hy itself a:~d ~• its behalf, and atter iiue consideratian of all
eviderice and reports off~red al-. said hearing, does find and determine the
Pollowing f.~cts:
1107U4r
PC 89-58
,
~:
~,. .~ _ ,: ,., , - ~ : ., . ; .: .1~~-1~~`~~I~~mlm-a^~~i~o~s .~w ,+' ~~~,r~
rr: ,,t.,,~i~. r ,~~..,~~...: ~ ....,
,. f;!~
;1
,~~ ~~ I,
1. That the existinr~ Ggnera.l P1aii ~~e3rmite; up to 1~119 dwelling ,;,I
u n i. t s f o r t h e S y c a m n r e Can yon devela pm«nt as sta~ecl in General P1an Amendrnent
No. 187.
2. T:-~L• the resadent~ u.l land u~e ~7en:~ities proposea i~n subject ,;
Ge:lera7. Pl~n Amendment rQquest ar:e g~enarall~~ com~~~~tible with L-he land usQ
dgn~ities approved wit,hin L•he Syc~~mox•a~ Canyon dovolopmen4:, as well as those
with:tn :Che Summit of Anaheim Hz11s ~:'.eve.lopment t:o the souCh.
3. That Exhik~it A i.s ~xppzopriate a`.or the~ 3t~id.y area, su~~jQG~~ ~~
~:hQ f~~llawi:ng conditions:
~Yia-:. the agproval
a o£ thc su;bjec~ amendment does not guarz-ntee the
)
i
3
.
developmant of 61 dvrelli:ig l~nits e
,
~
(a t~~tal c,~F 1,190 projeat-~a
ject
sc~
b
th
buti provides for a range ~~f 0- .
;
e
95 dwelli~.ng units for
determinEtd in
l x
study area. `The actua.l number
iderat; ~e
of units slzal
ion o~E ~he Specific P1an and
connection with the c~ns
subdivision approvals.
b. T'hat the applicant shall e.sta.blish a meclxan.isn~ to px'ovide on-going
mani~c~ring and transmit1:31 of' informatian k.o the Citiy c:anc~2rning
rhe fiscal impa~:t of iui:ure developmertts vrithin the subj9ct
ame~,~dment area.
~, That fut~.ir~s dev~lopment wit:tiin thb subject amsn~~mQZ~.t arc~a ~~ill
cc+iiform wzth a~l requiraments of SpQCific Ylan 08-1, Amenciment No.
]., as adoptod.
,CALI'F~RNTA ENV:(RQN~~NTAL ~UALITx,. ~~r i'I2JD~: That Environmental
Impact Repart tv~. 283, prsviously certifi.ed uy the C.ity Council in conjunction
with the Sycamore Canyon 5pecific P.lan. (5~88-~) is adequate ~a serve as the
requirr~d environmental docurnent~tion For i3~sneral Plarl AmencLnent No. 249 as no
aclditio~~al ;.mpacts would resu].~ from th~ al~~roval.
.NOW, TAEREE'ORE, F3E I~ RESOLV6'D,, that pursuant to the forpgoing
findings, tln~s Anaheim Czty Plan;,ing Cc;r.~r.3ssi.on. does hc~reby adopt an3 zecommend
to the City Council of the Ci~y of ~.nah~ir~i, adoption o~ General Plan Amendme:it
No. 249 - Land iTse Element, Exhibit 1~, subjE~ct L-o thF fol:lowing conditions:
1. Th~t tho a~~proval of the subject amenclmQnt does not guarantee the
de~velopment af 61 dwelling un.its (a total of 1,180 project-wide},
but provides Eor a range uf. 0-?5 dwelling units for the subject
st~~xcly area. T.he actual number of units sh~17. be determined in
coiinection witti the consideratioxi of tno Specific P1an and
^aubdivi.SiU~~ ap~~rovals.
~
;
~
2. That the appli~ant aha11 establish a mecl~anism to provide on-going
monitoring and transmittal oL- .inEoimation to ~:he ~ity c~ncerning
the fiscal impact oP future devel~pments within the subjoct
amenclment area.
3. 'lhat future devel~pment wxthin the subject amendment azea will
ronform with all re,{uiremsnts oE SpeciFic Plan 88-1, Amar~dment Ko.
.l, as adopted.
_2_ PC 89-58
~ ~' .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ , ~ , ~i ~~~r~~~~~~
' . ?ij ~~
, ~ , ~ {l~,~
'~
~ ~! , , ~
,
~ ~ ~~
~ ~t~k
~ ... .~~,. i;~.;
I~l
BE IT FL'RTHGR ~2ESOLVEA thaG the An~heim City Planning Commission ,~'`,?
does hereby find and de~~rmine that adogtion of tr,is Resolu~ion is expres~ly ;='`4-
<<, n
precii~ated upon appliCant's compliance with o2-cY~ and a11 af the conditions ;;.'r~
hQrei~na~ove set forth. Should any such condi~.ions, or any part thereof, be ,'~t~
declareG irivalid or unenforceablo by the tinal judcJment oE any court of :~'~~
competent jurisdiction, then this ResoluCion, and any approval~ haxeir~ ~-~:!~',+~
con~.ained, shall be doemed null an~ void. '"'`~`
<;,~~
,,`:~
_'.: x
THE FOREGOING RESOLiJTION is signed and approvQC~ by ine this 27~h ',.r
day of February, ly{i9. ,,;.g
,., ~' ,~~? ;~i
' <j`""`'~=i1~C.!-~e!~' ,{
CHAIRIaOMAI~; ANAHEIM C'ITY E'L~1~NNING COMtdISSICN r;~:s
ATTE S'P : v ?; `.;;'
~ ~/J ~ ' i
6LR-.C=tvc, ~-~~;i~t- -~,,~ ~ i ';
i
SEGRETAR~', ANAHEIM CtTY PLANPIIN~ COMMISSION ''~"
4
STATE QF CAI~IFARNIA ) 5~
COLiNTY OI' ORANGE ) :zs . `.J'
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) ;';,~
i, Edith L. Ha:ris, Secretary ~£ the Anahei.m City Planning '~'
Comrnission, do hersby cer;ify tha~t the f.oregozng resolution was passed and
adopted ~t a mepting of the Anaheim City Pla.nnirig Commissiozz held on Ft~b~-uary ;;,;,;
2'/, 1~189, by Che £~llowing vote of the memhars therFO.f: ';i
;'~
,,,i
AY~:S: CO'1~(ISSTONERS: BOUAS~ BO7~.~DSTUNr CARUSZLL(a~ FELDHAUS~ ~~SSE ''
i~ors: cor~rizssiar,FRS: rrorr~,:
VACANT COA~'~i~SSI0NER5: T'WO S~;ATS ';~~
'i~
IN WIl'NESS WH~REoF, T have here~xnro ,et my h~nd this 27th day of ;~~
February. 1989. ;j';'~
'?i
~~~ ' `r`~ ' ~~..~ /'/ ~ ~~-~l,'r',
-~ ~ 1...'.._'J~~-1/l_~~L!_.,.
SECRETAa2Y, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSTQN
~,>..
-~-
~C EI9-58
~J;
Sl
"(`
~~
_ _ . ;j,'.
~i
:V
~ ~~
.. ~ ~5~~