Resolution-PC 89-64~
-: , ; ,. ~, ~r~ n~~~'$'~ ~r~ ~'
~4.•+~ 1 ~wyt,n'j( ~
~ ~ `,~~ ~ ie~~'z
?i';~
; rs
',
8E~4.L.~~ 2N_..~..4.,_?~.$~.~ ~
A itESOLUTION QF THE ANAHEIM CI'rY PLANNING COMASTSSYnN
TfIAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE 2I0. 3911 BE GRANTED
'r~HEREAS, thc~ Anal~eirn City Planning Cornmission dicl receive a
verified Petition for Variance .£rom JACK NOSEIK E'T At.., ].2Q6 w. Ash Avenue,
I'ullertoxi, CA }2633, owner, ai~d T1i0Ml~S M~URER AFA & ASSOCIATES, 150 ~l Cainino
Real, Suite 200, Tustiin, CA 92680, a~ent for certain real property si~uated
in the City of Anaheim, County oi• Orazege, StatQ oi California described as:
Z`HS WESTERI,Y 74 k'EET JF T+~E NORTHERLY 195 FEET OF
THAT PORTION OF LOT 11 OF xHE MILES RANCHO, IN THE
CITY OF ANAHE:[Ni, COUNTY Ok' 4RAi~'GE, 5'TATE 0~
CAI,TFnRNIA, AS SH0~~1N ON A MAP TFYEREOF RECORA~D IN
BOOK 4 PAGE 7 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAI'S, RECORAS Ok' SAID
F ARANGE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FGLLQWS:
f3~GINNING A7' A POTNT ON THL SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT,
332.35 FEET FROM TIiE SOUTHEAST CORfTER OF SAID LOT;
TH~I3CE NORTIi 0 DEGREES 9 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST
1318.71 FEET, MORE OR LE$a, TO A POIN1' IN THF NOItTH
LINE 0~ SAIri I.OT 11; THENCE WEuTERLY ALONG THE NURTH
L~TNE OF SA.ID LOT, ].74 FEET. TO A P~INT; TAENCE
SOUTH~RLY ON A DIRGCT LINE 1318.71 FEE'T, MORE OR
LESS, TO A POINT ON THE SOi1TH T~IN~ OF SAIA LOT 11;
TI3~NCE EASTERLY A.LONG THE SOUTH LINE 08' SAID L' OT, 174
FEET T.0 THE POINT OF BEGINPIING.
.Y .
WIiET.tEAS~ L•he City Plann.ina Commission did hold a public he~ring
at the Civic Center in L•he Cir.y of Anaheim on Februa.rg 27, 7.9t19, at 1:30 p.m. ,
notice of said public hearing havinq been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provi.sions of L-he AYiaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
tn hoar and consider evidence for and against said proposed var3ance and to
i~vestigate anc~ make fi.nding, and recommondatiox~s in connection tYiQrewithp and
WFIEREAS, sa~cl Commission, aft~^r du~ inspection, inves4:igation
and study rnacle by itselF an3 in its beha.lr, and after due considerati.un ~f alY
evidence ~nd repdrts offared aL sa.ic] hearing, doe~ find and determine the
f~llow~ng facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes waivers of the f.oa2owinc~ t~
construct a 3-skory, 9-unit apartment complex:
(A) SECTIONS 18.34.Q~~~11 - ~~ximLxUL~~C~ral heiaht.
Ar~$., 4 Q 2.012 ,~l storv wi~hin 15d_feek of RS-72Q0 Zoni.r.g
~n~l 2 storig~ otherw~so p2rmitted; ~_ at 7U
feet ~torie,~ ~~ropo5ed) .
069~r
pr-a9-64
~.¢ .
~ ;a
%'a:':
r ~ i,''t%w~'
~ J ~<'u~' `'-_ ~ ~ . ~ ... ~... ~4.W~t~:r}!%i~elt~~~
~ ~
~
',, ~ ~ ~ . ~„ .,
~ ~ ~ '~,1"~'~7
~h
.. .:~..'.t~
~+
~
:!
7
2. That the above-nientionocl c,raiver is hereby grantod on the basis ;
that there aro special circwnst~n.cds app].icable tc the properl:y such as size, i~
~hanc~, ~apaqxaphy, location ancl surroundings which do not apply to ather
identica2].y zoned property in the same v;icinit~; and that stricC a~plicati~~n j
~t the 'lon~ng Code deprives the prape:rt,y of priviloges e:njoyod by othe~r (
properties 9.n the idQntical zon~ and class.ification in the vicinity. ~
3. That there are nxceFtionaJ. or extraordinary c.ircumstances oz•
condiLions aQplicable to t•.he groperty invulved or L~ t~e inCo:nded use of the '
proper~y that do not apply q~ner.all to th;e ,. ~'
sam~ vzcinity and zone. y Property or clas,s ~f u~e ,iz~ the ~,
4. That the req~r~sted variance is necessai:y for tl~ie ~+r,~servation
and enjoyment o£ a subst~ntial proporty ri5rhl ~ossossecl by other praperCy in
Lhe same vicinity and zone, ancl d~nie~i to the praper~y in questirn.
5, That the reque;;ted varianc~ ~aa.ll not be rna~eria].ly aetr.imentai
to Y.he public welfarQ or injur:ious to thQ pruperty or improve~ments i.n such
via'ni~y and zone in wtiich tne propNrty is 7.oratecl.
6. TYis~t no onQ indicated their presence at said pub:lic~ 2iearing in
~pposition and two Pe~plo indieated theS.r prQSence in favor of subjc~ct
requesS:; and that no corresp~~ndence was :raceived in opp~~sition to sulajecG
pelitior~.
,~LI~ RNII~ENVTRQN~1~rYTA~~ALI'rY, i~ 7 F~NDTt1G: 'That r.hE~ An~h~tim
City Planning Commi.ssion ha:~ re+view~ed the p~-o~c~sa1 to cons~truct a 3-skor,y,
9-uni~ apartment c~~mplex w:ith waiver ~f m~axin~um structur~~1 heic~ht ni~ a
rectangularly•-sha~ad par~cel oF ;~,and cor.sis+ting of. ~ip~rosimateay 0.2f~ acre
having a£rontage of app~oximatE~ly 74 fee~t nn the south sic~e of Romneyt~
Driva, havii~g a maximwn depth c~f approxiinz~tely ].63 feet, b~si.zig located
approximately 1500 feet we5t o£ the cent~~rline af Harbor Boulevard ~-nd
turther tlescribed a~ Fi06 W~rt ltomneya Drive (subsoque~ntly deLerr,iined t~ be
81U West l2omxieya Briv~e); ar.~d does herP~y a~p,prove ~h~ Negative Declaration
upon finding ~htat it has ecnsid3re~i tt:e Nega~tive Doclaration t:ogothor witli
any comments rec~eived dur.ing the public reviaw process tind furthEtr Einding on
tho basis of the initi~;l st~~dy and anp c~mme~lCs receive~d that there iis no
substantial evidenctr tll~tt the prnject: wi11 ha~~e a s:iqnificant ef'fect ox~ the
envirunm~ent.
NOW, THEREE'GRi:, HE IT RESAL,VEU tr~at the Anaheim GiLy P1~-nning
Commission doos hQr~el~y yrr.nt; subjecl: Pf3ti.tion 1'ar Vazi~,ncQ, upon the
follcwing conditions ~~h:lch ar~e heraby faund to b~ a nec.essary prer~quisite to
the prapnsed use ~f tlie yub ~~~ct prope,ty in o;c~le~r to presorvr the~ gafety s~nd
ganeral welf~3re ot the ('.iti::~~~is o£ tho L'ity of. A~zahezm:
r. That pri,or to issuFincr•~ of a bu.ilciin~7 per~r.it, tha appr~pritite traf.Ezc
Eignal assessment ~eo ~.ha11 bo ~aid t~ t;he City of Anaheim in an, amount
as e~tablishe9 by CiL•y C~auncil zes~lution.
Z. That t}xe ~3~~isting di~iveway on Romneya Drive shall be removed and
replacod wieh stand~~.rc~, curb and gutter, ;:idewalk and landscaping.
-2- PC89-64
f
~
~ _ . . . ~ ;'r~;
~
~
~1~6~~~ t ly ~
,(, i (t~,
~ ~i i ~
i .f.
~
;~isl
', h
~
3. That parking shall not bs permitked on the ten peraont (10~) grade
port.ion oE the parking garagQ r~unp as required by ~he C3.t;y Tra.ffic
Engineer.
4, That street lighting facilities along Rumneya Drzve shall be installed
a.s required by *he Utilities General Manager in a~corciance witk~
specifications on file in the Office of Utilities Gtneral M~ager; or
t.hat security in the form of a bond, certificate ~f depos~t, letter of
credit, or cash, in an amount and form satzsfacf;orX to the City of
Anaheim, shall be posted witn the City to guarantee the satisfactory
completi~n ~f the above-mentioned impro~remen~s. Said socurity sh37,1 be
posted w~lth th.e Citlr of AnahQim ~rior to i3suaiice ~f a building permit.
The above--re,quired impravement~ ~hall be installed pr.ior to occupancy.
5. Tha't sub;ect praper.ty sha11 be sprveci by underground utili.ties.
6. :Chat the 1ega1 owner uf subject property sha11 dc~dicate to the City of
Anaheim with a Etrip c~f land five (5) .feet in width locateci along the
southerly ~ixty (GO) fest of ~he wa~t ~roperty line ot subjeat property
far public ut:il.iCy purposes.
7. Ttiat trash s~oxuge areas gtiall be providad and r,~~zntained in a locatiAn
accel~table to ti:he Street Maintsn~nce anci Sanitation 1Division an~l in
aecordance with npproved pl~ins en file with said Division.
8. Thtat prior to f:inal buildang ancl znning znspectipns, "Ho park: ng for
street swe~ping" saqns shall be instal:l.ed a~ required by the Street
Mainten,~nce and Sanitation Division and in accoxdance with
speci~'icaLions on file with said ciivi~ion.
9. That: the renter u~ each residonLial dwPlling unit shall be provided with
writ:ten ini•ormation cnncerning Anaheim Municipal Cude Section 24.32~50U
pertainii~g tio "Paiki.nq restricted to fac.ilitaCe s~~rePt sweoping". Such
wrii:ten informatiori shall cl~arly inilicato when on-street parking is
proh.ibited ~nd the pen~3ty for violation.
'10. That khe cuxbirlg adjacent to subject property sha]..l be painted red to
f.acilitate on-street trash p3.ck-up.
l.1. That a fee s}Z~~11 k~e y?aid to the ~iL-y of Anaheim for tree planling along
namneya Drive s.n ar~ an?ount as Qstablished by City Council rssolution.
12. Th~3t prior to issuance of a building pezmiL-, apprepxiate paxk and
rocreaCion in-liou kQOS sh311 be paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amaunt as deterRinod by the City Counr_xl.
13. Tha* ga~es ~hall nat be insta.lled across C2ie driveway i.n a manner which
may adversely affect vQhicular traPfic in the adjacent public stroet.
Installat.ion of any gates shall confprm to the Fngineering Division'~
Standard Plan rlo. 402 and shall be aubject to the reviow and appr~ral of
the City Traffic Engineer.
-3-- PC89-64
'~(~~ _
. . .
. . , .
. . . .. .
.
~ . . . .
. . ~ . ' ~ ~ . . . . ~~~~ 1 }~rtir~N~)~~iYIF'~f~
~a 1 V ~~
I !
rt~~y
It ~~ ~{~
'
~
~ .
~
r't~ `
;'
', '~
, ~
P
i~a ~
,
;y^
,;i
~~ • That thc~ proposed g,arking struc~ure desiqn slaall conforu~ to the ;;
Engineeriilg Divisxon's Stanclard P].an No. 402-Ti perta3ning to atanciard `
details Eor parking structur~s ~nd r.amp requirements. -~;
15.
That r.:;e clr.ivc~waX shal.l be cons~,rucY.ed with ten (10) foot rad
ius curb t'
'~'
returns as required by the Czt,y EnginQer. _?;
'''; 16. That dra~.nage o~ subject proper.tiy sha11 be disposed nf iu 1!'~
z
sa~isFactory to the City Etigineer. m2nner ~r;~:'i
17.
T.hat aJ.l lockable podestrian, vehacular access gates sh~s11 bp
with
"
"
~quipped
'`f
,};
a
ki;ox box
dev.ice, if required by tne Fire a~nd/ar
Department. Po~.ice ~i.
:
18. That fire ~prinklers shall be installeR as reg~iirod by the Ci~y Fire
Department,
19. Tha~ all air condition~ing Eaci~itiQS and other roof and ground mount;ed
equipment shall b~s properly shielded from vieur, and thQ sound buf:fer9d
from adjacerit; resi.dential properti~s.
i0. That all plwnbing loaated on i:he exterior of the building shall be
properly scre~~ned irom view hy archiY.ectura.I devices and/or landacaping,
21. Tliat praor to issuance of a buil~iing permit, the .legal property oknar
shall prapare anr3 record an unsubordinated covenant limiting occupancy
of, each apartrr~ent un:it to no more ttlan twa ( 2) per. ~ons (oth~r than
children under the ag~ o£ two (2) ya~is) per bedro~m. Said limitation
shall be inc].uded in each lease/rental agreernent. A copy of the
covenant shall be submitted tc and approved by the City Attorney prior
to recordation. A copy af the recorded c~~vc~nant s2ia11 be .furnished to
the Zc~ning Division.
22. That a covenant shal~ b8 recox•ded agreeing to provide the renter of eaeh
dwolling unit with wri~ten snformat.i~n obtained from tho School
Distri~t(s) pertaiuing to possible overcY~owd~d ;:onditione and busing
status of tho sch~oJ.(~) serving ~he dwelling unit.
23. That subject property shall be devolaped substaxitially in ~cc~rdance
with plans and sperif3cations on file with Lhe Cizy of Anaheim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 ~hrough 4.
24. That prior to issuancQ of a}~uild:ing permit, or withi.n a
~1)
f per.iod of ona
year
rom the date of thi;
rondition Nos
1
3 resnlutiori, whichc~ver ocr.urs first,
.
,
, 4, 6,
above-mentioned, s2iall ~ie c;omplied 1~., 12, 13, 14, J.G,
with
Extensio
i 21 and 22,
completc~ said conditions may be .
ns
or E
granted in accordance urther
with time to
Secti
18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code. on
;~
<i
~=~
~ 1j
;;~:
F;
=,;
}' ~
`, ~?:
,Y
.;
';a
,;;
PC89-64
_~~ i
.,;
'~: ~;:
... .,.... ''t?;S
~,~`~~.~',ix"~" L.,; n.sx~9~ , ;;~ :.. . ....::.. . :...... .~i~::!~~'~r,?,~k,,,~14,!•` '. . , ., ,.. . .. . .'?~,; _v.iy . , .^:sen . , ,.,u~: „~avry~
} ,~N'4''Y~G,O~ hxp•~,~nr~
.,
I
. .
~ [
jr~~~ y~~~
. 11 ~
^~ ~~ ~~
r
;tr
i
r'~
25. That p.rior tU £.inal building and zoning inspecL•ians~ Conditian Nos. ~,, ~
4, 5, 7, 8, lU, 1? • 14, 15, 16, .l7 ~ 18, 19, 2p ancl 23, above-mentionec~,
shall be complied wi~h.
26. That approval oE this appli.c.ation constitut.es approval o~ tho proposed
requost only to the oxtent that it complies with the Auaheim Municipal '
Zoning Code and ariy uChox applicable City reguiations. A~proval does il
not include any acL-ion or Ei.ndings as to compliance or approval of the ~~
request regarding any oth,er applicable ardin~nce, regulation Qr ;
requirement. ~
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commissiori ~'~4
~3oes hereby find and determine that adoption of• this Resalution is expressly ~i
pr~dicated upon applicar~t's cc~mpliance witYl each and all of the conditions "`.f
hereinabove set forth. Should any such cor,9itiorzs, or any part thereof, be
d~clarea invalid or unexi£orceable by ~he final judgment of any court of ~
competent juri.sdiction, then this ResoluL•ion, and any apprnvals herein.
cox~tained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOF.GGQING RESOLUTION is ssgned and apprcved by me this 27th day
o f February, i989 . -
,J L G'l.-.P.
ti
i //~~!
1/ ^
~ .
,
_
.,
J
-T __~
.~ ._. _._
CHAIRWOMAN,. ANAHETM CITY PLANNIHG COMMTSSTON
,~
A1rTEST:
V
(
~ ~
2
Ol
~
~
i
UC-,,.
.
.
,
~(~_
SECRrTARY, ANA~iE7Di CITY PI.,AN~IYNG COMMISS:[ON
STATE OP CALIFOR2~IA ) ,~
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss . ~''
, CITY OF ANAHETM )
T, Edith L. Harris, Secreta•ry of the Anahe,im City Planniizg Commis.zion,
do horeby cartify that th~ forec~uing resolt~tion was passed and adopted at a
meeting of Che Anaheim Cii:y P].anning Comm.9.ssion held on Fabruary 27, ~989, by
the following vote of the mcmb~rs thereoi•;
AYESi CCIMMISSTQNERSt BOUAS, BOYASTUN, CARUSILLO, FELDHAUS, MESSE
NO~St COMMISSTONERS: NONE
VACANT: COMMISSIUNERS: TWO ~~ACIIDTT
TN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuuto set my hand this 27th day of ~
February, ~?89.
~ ' ;:
7l~~ ~ ;ti
SEC: ETAP.Y, .ANA'clETM CIT`t PLAIJNING COMMYSSION '`~'
';r
. ;;y
i ~r
iv
--5- PC89=64 ;;~
~f
. , ~.'~`'i 4
~~'il~~~
~,~:
y~
. . . ~ , ' ~ . . , . . . . .. . . ~ , ;.
. _ ~,;.:i+'}~,